so many dumb suggestions floating around smh. 

its very straight forward. to produce better players we need to have international breaks because without them coaches will prefer to pick non-internationals (including youth internationals), we need transfer fees because that will provide further incentive to producing and playing young players and we need more teams at a national level ie more teams in the a-league and a second division and a third division etc. 

International breaks might not work too well as far as marketing the competition goes. We're not Europe. Other sporting codes don't have them.
I've never understood why we haven't had transfer fees for contracted players. 

Why is England continually being used as an example?

What has Argentina done in the last two decades? Have they been performing poorly because of foreign players in their local league?

The premise is ridiculous.