http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-15/an-phils-milf-treaty/5323142

The Phillipines are close to signing a treaty with the MILF organisation

Its almost like the Colombians and that Liberation army named FARC

quite disturbing actually, placating islamists

Theyre all MILFs pretty much :oops: :-k :-# :-({|= :-"

If it was terrorism why has there been no credible acceptance of responsibility?

They don't always claim responsibility immediately, look at 9/11.

That's if it was even done by a group.

Edited by iridium1010: 16/3/2014 11:38:15 PM

Because when islam is involved there is a different mindset. They do not always accept responsibility for ghastly deeds, and in many cases will completely deny it. They just live on with a sick and morbid silent knowledge of what they were involved in, and think that their allah god (a demon?) will reward them for the blood sacrifice.

Please tell me more about how you have absolutely no fucking idea what you're on about.

Not sure if this is in the appropriate thread, or whether its even genuine, but anyways.....

:lol:

Not too soon

its an Airbus

It's fake. That picture is an Airbus A-380. The Boeing 777 only has 2 engines and 1 level of windows. Not the kind of mistake an airline is likely to make on one of their advertisements.

you could've just read the previous post genius

Yes but majority of the time you make a statement you're blatantly wrong so I figure people just ignore you. Think of it as a community service.

Rice Crackers is the new ducky/notorganic. :lol:

give me one example?

:cool:

actually, while you're at it give me another 244 examples on top of that

Edited by ricecrackers: 17/3/2014 08:29:41 PM

This post is an example. You've made a statement trying to be clever based around that every post you've made is a statement. This is wrong.

ok, well you're only making your task more difficult to prove, you do realise this dont you?

more statements, mean more examples :cool:

Is there any danger, any at all, that you don't post something indescribably fucking stupid?

it always ends this way with you... some obscenity or abuse
hardly necessary and the last refuge of a fool

So we started off with you making a statement which was ignored.
The I state that this is because majority of your statements are wrong.
Then you make a statement about majority of your posts, thus being wrong and proving me right based off the assumption that more than half your posts are statements.
You then follow that up with a question. Thus proving yourself wrong again...

And then you necessitate me spelling out your stupidity. It's not over when I abuse you. It's over when you start posting.

Edited by afromanGT: 17/3/2014 09:28:46 PM

what on earth are you on about? :lol:

When precisely did the Ukranian government attempt to physically extirpate and expel their Russian minority?

Except they didn't "vote to become independent from Ukraine".

The voting process wasn't anonymous - you put the ballot into a box designated with which way you were voting, in front of armed guards.

There was also no option to remain part of Ukraine either. The options were either secede and become their own state, or to join Russia.

you do realise the overwhelming majority of people that live in Crimea are Russian dont you?
you do realise that Crimea was already an autonomous state and that was actually one of the options?

You do realise that this wasn't the point, right?

How can you 'vote' for independence from Ukraine when there's no alternative but to vote to secede from Ukranian governance?

they were already an autonomous state you dope

the rejected option was ""Are you in favour of restoring the 1992 Constitution and the status of Crimea as a part of Ukraine?"

once again you display total ignorance

Again; there was no option to repatriate with Ukraine.

why would they want to do that?