13,752 = Melbourne Heart out -> Alessandro Del Piero in


13,752 = Melbourne Heart out -> Alessandro Del Piero in

Author
Message
chris
chris
Pro
Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K, Visits: 0
Heartinator wrote:
I think, in hindsight, SMFC (or an FFA variation of it) should've been the second team in Melbourne.

I can understand why it wasnt, I can understand why it would've been risky - but at least you would've almost guaranteed a solid hardcore support base to rival others.

My only concern is (and maybe SMFC supporters can enlighten me) but if FFA decided to include SMFC into the competition, but "filtered" it so that it no longer had the affiliation to the Greek community etc but maintained the spine of the squad/back room staff - would you guys still support it? Or would it need to be 100% as it is now, unedited by the FFA in order for you to accept it?


Good question Heartinator

This is my view and certainly does not represent smfc - its members and its fans

clubs need to aknowledge who they are and their past - however equally important is that they need to move forward and develop

I am a firm believer in any level of business is if you sit still - you die

As long as smfc is open for business to all communities then I am a big endorser of such a model - smfc would truly represent a club that offers heritage - not a greek heritage as that would be one column of many - but a heritage that would attract a merket within our community

The been there done that and we are back bigger and better approach
chris
chris
Pro
Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K, Visits: 0
f1worldchamp wrote:
I'm not sure why you believe Heart's failure is any sort of vindication that SMFC (or SXFC) should be in the A-League? If anything, it proves Melbourne wasn't ready for a second team, ANY second team.


dissagree - you are selling the game way too short if you honestly believe only 1 team in a city of 4.5 million
Maco_Jason
Maco_Jason
Fan
Fan (63 reputation)Fan (63 reputation)Fan (63 reputation)Fan (63 reputation)Fan (63 reputation)Fan (63 reputation)Fan (63 reputation)Fan (63 reputation)Fan (63 reputation)Fan (63 reputation)Fan (63 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 61, Visits: 0
Heart_fan wrote:
Half hearted?? No I call that a balanced view, which weighs up the options that were on the table and the risks that would have been taken into account. Its something some on here can't do from there own perspective.


If even Heart fans are unsure of their legitimacy in the league, then that speaks volumes.
chris
chris
Pro
Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K, Visits: 0
Heart_fan wrote:
erb wrote:
chris wrote:
Heart_fan wrote:
chris wrote:
dsriggs wrote:
Why is there 13 pages devoted to this awful troll?? Come on, guys :roll:


Where is the troll - stop trying to shut down a very relevant argument

SXFC (smfc) and MH were direct competitors for the 2nd Melbourne Team - it is only natural that there will be a direct clash between the fans of both groups from time to time especially when the MH do not meet the legacy it set out to achieve

It is extremely relevant and generates a healthy debate between football fans - it stimulates competitive juices and is good for football


And this everyone just proves that bitterness runs deep to some :lol:

Build a bridge and concentrate on your own club.


I am not bitter

I have a lot of dirty Laundry on the Heart and their financial model I can post here but refuse to do so as it will damage the game on many levels and dilute the Melbourne market further

I do not want to turn this thread into porn - my comments and sentiments have been based on Above the Line evidence not Below the Line

seems media activity in the last 24 hrs backs me up

Edited by chris: 12/12/2012 10:59:34 AM


Do it


Yeah, put up or shut up.

Its another case of the usual playbook used by a few on here, starting rumours which have all been proven to fall very flat. Credibility isn't exactly something a few on here can claim.


Melbourne Heart have approached the state government for money - government is hesitant on the basis they are a private business and do not represent community

chris
chris
Pro
Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K, Visits: 0
f1worldchamp wrote:
Benjamin wrote:
f1worldchamp wrote:
I'm not sure why you believe Heart's failure is any sort of vindication that SMFC (or SXFC) should be in the A-League? If anything, it proves Melbourne wasn't ready for a second team, ANY second team.


I believe the argument is that Heart are struggling due to a lack of clear identity, whereas SXFC's affiliation with SMFC was well known and would have provided history/identity. As many would have been turned off by this as would have been turned on - however it would have provided a marketing point. Also, with so many disliking South, there's a good chance that certain elements would have followed South games in the hope that we'd lose (in much the same way as the only AFL result I look for is Collingwood - in the hope that the black-and-white-bas***ds get smashed).

But there are no guarantees that would happen. For your Collingwood analogy, does your hate make you go to Collingwood games or buy their merchandise? How does the league benefit from that? How would SMFC benefit from the hate? And would it be the wrong kind, the kind that makes the news?


someone mentioned a few pages back that to this day Perth Glory and Adel Utd highest regular season attendance was against smfc - not sure if fully accurate or recently eclipsed - however smfc does create a stromg consideration in the market even away from home

Even today at VPL level - the other clubs have their pay day v smfc - obviously at a much smaller scale to what the club created at a national level

Edited by chris: 12/12/2012 03:30:08 PM
f1worldchamp
f1worldchamp
Pro
Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.7K, Visits: 0
chris wrote:
f1worldchamp wrote:
Benjamin wrote:
f1worldchamp wrote:
I'm not sure why you believe Heart's failure is any sort of vindication that SMFC (or SXFC) should be in the A-League? If anything, it proves Melbourne wasn't ready for a second team, ANY second team.


I believe the argument is that Heart are struggling due to a lack of clear identity, whereas SXFC's affiliation with SMFC was well known and would have provided history/identity. As many would have been turned off by this as would have been turned on - however it would have provided a marketing point. Also, with so many disliking South, there's a good chance that certain elements would have followed South games in the hope that we'd lose (in much the same way as the only AFL result I look for is Collingwood - in the hope that the black-and-white-bas***ds get smashed).

But there are no guarantees that would happen. For your Collingwood analogy, does your hate make you go to Collingwood games or buy their merchandise? How does the league benefit from that? How would SMFC benefit from the hate? And would it be the wrong kind, the kind that makes the news?


someone mentioned a few pages back that to this day Perth Glory and Adel Utd highest regular season attendance was against smfc

Is there a deal in the A-League where the visiting team get a cut of gate takings? If not, then I don't see how this helps you.

chris
chris
Pro
Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K, Visits: 0
f1worldchamp wrote:
chris wrote:
f1worldchamp wrote:
Benjamin wrote:
f1worldchamp wrote:
I'm not sure why you believe Heart's failure is any sort of vindication that SMFC (or SXFC) should be in the A-League? If anything, it proves Melbourne wasn't ready for a second team, ANY second team.


I believe the argument is that Heart are struggling due to a lack of clear identity, whereas SXFC's affiliation with SMFC was well known and would have provided history/identity. As many would have been turned off by this as would have been turned on - however it would have provided a marketing point. Also, with so many disliking South, there's a good chance that certain elements would have followed South games in the hope that we'd lose (in much the same way as the only AFL result I look for is Collingwood - in the hope that the black-and-white-bas***ds get smashed).

But there are no guarantees that would happen. For your Collingwood analogy, does your hate make you go to Collingwood games or buy their merchandise? How does the league benefit from that? How would SMFC benefit from the hate? And would it be the wrong kind, the kind that makes the news?


someone mentioned a few pages back that to this day Perth Glory and Adel Utd highest regular season attendance was against smfc

Is there a deal in the A-League where the visiting team get a cut of gate takings? If not, then I don't see how this helps you.


you serious???
f1worldchamp
f1worldchamp
Pro
Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.7K, Visits: 0
chris wrote:
f1worldchamp wrote:
chris wrote:
f1worldchamp wrote:
Benjamin wrote:
f1worldchamp wrote:
I'm not sure why you believe Heart's failure is any sort of vindication that SMFC (or SXFC) should be in the A-League? If anything, it proves Melbourne wasn't ready for a second team, ANY second team.


I believe the argument is that Heart are struggling due to a lack of clear identity, whereas SXFC's affiliation with SMFC was well known and would have provided history/identity. As many would have been turned off by this as would have been turned on - however it would have provided a marketing point. Also, with so many disliking South, there's a good chance that certain elements would have followed South games in the hope that we'd lose (in much the same way as the only AFL result I look for is Collingwood - in the hope that the black-and-white-bas***ds get smashed).

But there are no guarantees that would happen. For your Collingwood analogy, does your hate make you go to Collingwood games or buy their merchandise? How does the league benefit from that? How would SMFC benefit from the hate? And would it be the wrong kind, the kind that makes the news?


someone mentioned a few pages back that to this day Perth Glory and Adel Utd highest regular season attendance was against smfc

Is there a deal in the A-League where the visiting team get a cut of gate takings? If not, then I don't see how this helps you.


you serious???

This thread is a direct comparison between the current Heart HOME crowds and the theory that SMFC could do better. So yes I'm serious. How do away crowds help this arguement?
chris
chris
Pro
Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K, Visits: 0
Exposure -> Sposorships -> Rating -> Revenue -> and of course Rivalries

All of it equally as important as home crowds

The Heart have 1 of the poorest attendance rate home and away
Ali07
Ali07
Legend
Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K, Visits: 0
Daniel son wrote:
FFA should be thankful it has South's interest.

And I thought some Victory fans had massive heads! :lol:
f1worldchamp
f1worldchamp
Pro
Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)Pro (2.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.7K, Visits: 0
chris wrote:
Exposure -> Sposorships -> Rating -> Revenue -> and of course Rivalries

All of it equally as important as home crowds

The Heart have 1 of the poorest attendance rate home and away

You only thing you have to prove SMFC would do any better than Heart is hope. Which in itself is admirable. But you cannot say they can becuase, until they get the chance, there is no way to prove it.
Adrian72
Adrian72
Hacker
Hacker (388 reputation)Hacker (388 reputation)Hacker (388 reputation)Hacker (388 reputation)Hacker (388 reputation)Hacker (388 reputation)Hacker (388 reputation)Hacker (388 reputation)Hacker (388 reputation)Hacker (388 reputation)Hacker (388 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 383, Visits: 0
paulbagzFC wrote:
KenGooner_GCU wrote:
Wrote this on the SBS facebook page:
Melbourne Heart fans, expect to be the target of disdain and abuse by people who think a football club is judged by its commercial value. Then expect your emotional attachment to be disregarded as moot due to that commercial value.

Welcome to the A-League, where we are football until you're not worth it.


+111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111

-PB


Yep. It's fucking sad to see another episode of this sport trying to eat its own.

I've got no fear that Heart will continue to grow and be a sustainable club. I've seen it first hand. The first Heart game I went to had an attendance of 4,000. I've seen crowds grow to double that and more. I've seen first hand the Heart community grow, with kids and families getting on board. I've seen the excitement and dedication. There is a groundswell of fans and a big reserve of goodwill for the club. We're already bigger and more diverse than South Melbourne has ever been.

But to see people jump on like vultures at any suggestion that Heart are in trouble is pathetic.

Chris is full of shit. He posted here a while ago telling everyone that Sidwell was going to leave. Said he had inside information and all that sort of shit. He was wrong. But he posted again and again to stir trouble. He's doing the same thing again. His agenda is obvious. He's a troll. He has a history of this.

Edited by Adrian72: 12/12/2012 04:30:51 PM
KenGooner_GCU
KenGooner_GCU
Pro
Pro (2.6K reputation)Pro (2.6K reputation)Pro (2.6K reputation)Pro (2.6K reputation)Pro (2.6K reputation)Pro (2.6K reputation)Pro (2.6K reputation)Pro (2.6K reputation)Pro (2.6K reputation)Pro (2.6K reputation)Pro (2.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K, Visits: 0
I sympathise to a degree, but really I'd like to see it all crash and burn considering the amount of Heart on the "fuck GCU" bandwagon. The A-League would be in big trouble, making me even happier. Fuck you all!

Hello

Benjamin
Benjamin
Legend
Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K, Visits: 0
f1worldchamp wrote:
Benjamin wrote:
f1worldchamp wrote:
I'm not sure why you believe Heart's failure is any sort of vindication that SMFC (or SXFC) should be in the A-League? If anything, it proves Melbourne wasn't ready for a second team, ANY second team.


I believe the argument is that Heart are struggling due to a lack of clear identity, whereas SXFC's affiliation with SMFC was well known and would have provided history/identity. As many would have been turned off by this as would have been turned on - however it would have provided a marketing point. Also, with so many disliking South, there's a good chance that certain elements would have followed South games in the hope that we'd lose (in much the same way as the only AFL result I look for is Collingwood - in the hope that the black-and-white-bas***ds get smashed).

But there are no guarantees that would happen. For your Collingwood analogy, does your hate make you go to Collingwood games or buy their merchandise? How does the league benefit from that? How would SMFC benefit from the hate? And would it be the wrong kind, the kind that makes the news?


No, but the combined and general disdain for Collingwood from outside the club has been used within the club to build a siege mentality. It raises publicity - it makes that game against Collingwood more 'special' for your own club. EVERYONE looks forward to beating them.

As for 'hate' - it's too strong a word. I dislike Collingwood. I don't hate. I'd assume it would be the same with SMFC in the A-League - many would dislike. I know our supporters would get under a lot of people's skins because we would (rightly) be proud of the club's history, etc.

Anything which builds rivalries, increases publicity, and improves finances within the A-League should be considered a step forward.
Benjamin
Benjamin
Legend
Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K, Visits: 0
By the way - I do find it amusing that people bring up SMFC attendances in the NSL as a reason to doubt our pulling power in the A-League, but gloss over the far inferior crowds that Newcastle and Brisbane used to pull in the same competition. They both seem to be doing fine with crowds these days.
chris
chris
Pro
Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K, Visits: 0
Adrian72 wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
KenGooner_GCU wrote:
Wrote this on the SBS facebook page:
Melbourne Heart fans, expect to be the target of disdain and abuse by people who think a football club is judged by its commercial value. Then expect your emotional attachment to be disregarded as moot due to that commercial value.

Welcome to the A-League, where we are football until you're not worth it.


+111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111

-PB


Yep. It's fucking sad to see another episode of this sport trying to eat its own.

I've got no fear that Heart will continue to grow and be a sustainable club. I've seen it first hand. The first Heart game I went to had an attendance of 4,000. I've seen crowds grow to double that and more. I've seen first hand the Heart community grow, with kids and families getting on board. I've seen the excitement and dedication. There is a groundswell of fans and a big reserve of goodwill for the club. We're already bigger and more diverse than South Melbourne has ever been.

But to see people jump on like vultures at any suggestion that Heart are in trouble is pathetic.

Chris is full of shit. He posted here a while ago telling everyone that Sidwell was going to leave. Said he had inside information and all that sort of shit. He was wrong. But he posted again and again to stir trouble. He's doing the same thing again. His agenda is obvious. He's a troll. He has a history of this.

Edited by Adrian72: 12/12/2012 04:30:51 PM


he was at a time when GCU and NGF were going down - he was disillusioned about the game at 1 stage - probably still is from time to time
chris
chris
Pro
Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K, Visits: 0
Benjamin wrote:
By the way - I do find it amusing that people bring up SMFC attendances in the NSL as a reason to doubt our pulling power in the A-League, but gloss over the far inferior crowds that Newcastle and Brisbane used to pull in the same competition. They both seem to be doing fine with crowds these days.


true - very true
vanbasten88
vanbasten88
Pro
Pro (3K reputation)Pro (3K reputation)Pro (3K reputation)Pro (3K reputation)Pro (3K reputation)Pro (3K reputation)Pro (3K reputation)Pro (3K reputation)Pro (3K reputation)Pro (3K reputation)Pro (3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K, Visits: 0
Benjamin wrote:
By the way - I do find it amusing that people bring up SMFC attendances in the NSL as a reason to doubt our pulling power in the A-League, but gloss over the far inferior crowds that Newcastle and Brisbane used to pull in the same competition. They both seem to be doing fine with crowds these days.

Yeah cool story bro, one day you and the rest of the delusionals will realise that Olympic and South will NEVER ever play in the HAL and you can stop wasting our 1s and 0s(not forgetting to mention time) on this board.
sugoibaka
sugoibaka
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K, Visits: 0
vanbasten88 wrote:
Yeah cool story bro, one day you and the rest of the delusionals will realise that Olympic and South will NEVER ever play in the HAL and you can stop wasting our 1s and 0s(not forgetting to mention time) on this board.


If that indeed turns out to be the case, then Australian football will be poorer for it.
BackFour
BackFour
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K, Visits: 0
chris wrote:
As I said - there are quite a few observers questioning what the Heart bring to the table

I am sure more articles like this to come.......

http://www.theroar.com.au/2012/12/12/beckham-or-bust-for-melbourne-heart/


Quote:
Beckham or bust for Melbourne Heart


Melbourne Heart can no longer afford for the idle speculation linking the club to David Beckham to be just that – speculation. They need him. Badly.
Maybe even that’s understating it. The club’s very future may, perhaps, depend on his signature.
We all know that expecting big-name marquee stars to act as cure-alls and problem solvers is a silly, silly thing to do.
And it hurts to say this, because Melbourne Heart are an extremely likeable club – probably the most popular ‘second team’ in the A-League.
But without Beckham, the red and white outfit might be hurtling towards a fate that was perhaps eerily dictated by their selection of a Stoke-inspired home shirt – mediocrity and irrelevance.
Or worse still, extinction.
Let’s hope it doesn’t come to that – any fan with a soul shudders at the thought of a club closing its doors.
And, besides, we should really have gotten all our fascination with morbid grave-dancing out of our system when North Queensland and Gold Coast were cut.
But the truth is the Heart’s troubles have been bubbling under the surface for some time now – only disguised by Melbourne derbies, Clive Palmer’s endless jibber-jabber and the romanticism of the Del Piero era.
Yesterday’s terrific article from jamesb once again put forward the question that has been asked of Melbourne Heart since day one, but never really answered – who on earth are they?
What does this club mean? Who does it represent? Does anyone really know?
There are a few points of difference, we’re told. One – they’re not Melbourne Victory, which is actually a pretty good start.
People hate Victory and Kevin Muscat and their combined arrogance and so by positioning themselves as the nice guys of Melbourne, the Heart curried a bit of favour from neutrals from day one.
That, and the club’s commitment to playing ‘attractive football’.
What that is, exactly, remains unclear – but it is highly likely Ange Postecoglou will reach that pot of gold at the end of the rainbow before John Aloisi does.
Just by signing Postecoglou, the Heart’s arch-rivals blew that so-called advantage to smithereens. So there’s that gone. And neutrals don’t pay the bills.
What else… Young players? No, Newcastle have that covered at the minute – besides, you can’t sign Vince Grella and Richard Garcia and then claim ‘academy’.
Location? No. Anything socio-economic? Not yet. AAMI Park? Now we’re clutching at straws.
When the Heart joined the league, there was skepticism from the outset that they weren’t different enough to the behemoth that is Victory.
That skepticism was hushed by assurances that there’s a growth strategy in place and that crowds will eventually grow to an average of 10,000 in three or five or however many years and so on and so forth.
Well, after this past weekend, it’s pretty clear to see that if there is any growth at all, it is not coming quickly enough, with the expiry date of their ‘sweetheart’ stadium deal at Swan Street is fast approaching.
Especially not when Postecoglou is across town fiddling with a false nine system that is showing glimpses of stunning functionality.
So what now?
The Heart need not be a powerhouse but they can’t survive like this. If crowds don’t pick up immediately, if not sooner, then their stadium deal will eventually eat them whole.
It’s okay to offset that every now and then with the transfer fee from the sale of a rising star – but then Melburnians can see through that, and the cut-price appointment of Aloisi, as an admission of defeat.
And we’ve seen what can happen to the A-League when the poisonous stench of ‘uncool’ left behind by low four-figure crowds hangs about.
Which brings us back to David Beckham, still one of the world’s most marketable athletes and the very embodiment of cool.
It isn’t smart to pin your hopes on a marquee but maybe this is the Heart’s best and only opportunity to bridge the gap with Melbourne Victory.
There just isn’t enough room for the Heart to tell its own story with the suffocating influence of the other mob in town.
With Beckham in red and white, however, the whole planet will suddenly be interested in what goes on at La Trobe University.
That wouldn’t fix everything. And yes, people will probably stop caring the minute he jets back to the US.
But what it would do is give Melbourne Heart a voice that it otherwise would not have and an opportunity to bring about the growth that was promised but never delivered.
Then it has, at least, a chance. A foot in the door. The alternative is frightening.
Without Becks, the rich in Melbourne – Victory – will get richer.
And the Heart will either hold onto a tiny corner of the market and become perennial off-field grafters, or disappear altogether.
Neither is a deserving outcome for a club run so well and founded with such admirable intentions.



Edited by chris: 12/12/2012 09:53:41 AM


Hm - I seem to remember SMFC having used exactly the same strategy, - Macdonald from Newcastle seems to ring a bell as a guest player.
BUT You criticize MH for the same thing - very hypocritical or selective memory?
BackFour
BackFour
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K, Visits: 0
Heartinator wrote:
I think, in hindsight, SMFC (or an FFA variation of it) should've been the second team in Melbourne.

I can understand why it wasnt, I can understand why it would've been risky - but at least you would've almost guaranteed a solid hardcore support base to rival others.

My only concern is (and maybe SMFC supporters can enlighten me) but if FFA decided to include SMFC into the competition, but "filtered" it so that it no longer had the affiliation to the Greek community etc but maintained the spine of the squad/back room staff - would you guys still support it? Or would it need to be 100% as it is now, unedited by the FFA in order for you to accept it?


The FFA is not stupid, if they believed they could "filter out" as you put it, the Greek affiliation of course they would have included SMFC.
The SMFC supporters here misrepresent the reality that the supporter base remains mon- ethnic, they actually suggest that support is broad based, but a visit to any SMFC proves nothing has changed.

SMFC is being subjected, to death by irrelevance, and threads like this are the last skirmishes of resistance by a small number of loyal, passionate but misguided zealots.
chris
chris
Pro
Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K, Visits: 0
BackFour wrote:
Heartinator wrote:
I think, in hindsight, SMFC (or an FFA variation of it) should've been the second team in Melbourne.

I can understand why it wasnt, I can understand why it would've been risky - but at least you would've almost guaranteed a solid hardcore support base to rival others.

My only concern is (and maybe SMFC supporters can enlighten me) but if FFA decided to include SMFC into the competition, but "filtered" it so that it no longer had the affiliation to the Greek community etc but maintained the spine of the squad/back room staff - would you guys still support it? Or would it need to be 100% as it is now, unedited by the FFA in order for you to accept it?


The FFA is not stupid, if they believed they could "filter out" as you put it, the Greek affiliation of course they would have included SMFC.
The SMFC supporters here misrepresent the reality that the supporter base remains mon- ethnic, they actually suggest that support is broad based, but a visit to any SMFC proves nothing has changed.

SMFC is being subjected, to death by irrelevance, and threads like this are the last skirmishes of resistance by a small number of loyal, passionate but misguided zealots.


As your name suggests - spoken like a true defender

The Heart is clearly not working - insisting otherwise is deception to yourself

smfc will average much more fans than the Heart

Away games will be alot more attended than what the Heart generates

Victory will also get more fans if smfc is ever admitted

And we have a home ground with a social club - and we get paid to use it - not the other way around - and as Merlino amongst other politician quoted as saying it is 1 of 2 world class facilities in this city -> the only thing missing is a commercial aspect - well sorry to bust your chops but smfc is that commercial aspect

Government will not spend $60 Million on a fascility without a projected return - Athletics have an ad hoc calendar - especially at a spectator level and the VIS is Below the Line - meaning no spectator representation

the location is linked to 3 prominant arteries linking the South - South/eastern and eastern regions

A true differentiation aspect to the centralised victory

Interesting how MH were pushed north in Latrobe when their whole bid was anchored on the south east region originally

Edited by chris: 12/12/2012 07:43:58 PM
BackFour
BackFour
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K, Visits: 0
chris wrote:
BackFour wrote:
Heartinator wrote:
I think, in hindsight, SMFC (or an FFA variation of it) should've been the second team in Melbourne.

I can understand why it wasnt, I can understand why it would've been risky - but at least you would've almost guaranteed a solid hardcore support base to rival others.

My only concern is (and maybe SMFC supporters can enlighten me) but if FFA decided to include SMFC into the competition, but "filtered" it so that it no longer had the affiliation to the Greek community etc but maintained the spine of the squad/back room staff - would you guys still support it? Or would it need to be 100% as it is now, unedited by the FFA in order for you to accept it?


The FFA is not stupid, if they believed they could "filter out" as you put it, the Greek affiliation of course they would have included SMFC.
The SMFC supporters here misrepresent the reality that the supporter base remains mon- ethnic, they actually suggest that support is broad based, but a visit to any SMFC proves nothing has changed.

SMFC is being subjected, to death by irrelevance, and threads like this are the last skirmishes of resistance by a small number of loyal, passionate but misguided zealots.


As your name suggests - spoken like a true defender

The Heart is clearly not working - insisting otherwise is deception to yourself

smfc will average much more fans than the Heart

Away games will be alot more attended than what the Heart generates

Victory will also get more fans if smfc is ever admitted

Edited by chris: 12/12/2012 07:33:27 PM


SMFC will get mono-ethnic crowds, which is not what the FFA wants - what don't you get about this?

You criticize MH trying to get Beckham, but find it acceptable when SMFC did it with Macdonald - you are a hypocrite.

You are simply trolling here - SMFC is only relevant to the future of the game in the minds of very few - all of whom could comfortably meet in a phone. box.
chris
chris
Pro
Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K, Visits: 0


Government will not spend $60 Million on a fascility without a projected return - Athletics have an ad hoc calendar - especially at a spectator level and the VIS is Below the Line - meaning no spectator representation

the location is linked to 3 prominant arteries linking the South - South/eastern and eastern regions


Interesting how MH were pushed north in Latrobe when their whole bid was anchored on the south east region originally
BackFour
BackFour
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K, Visits: 0
chris wrote:


Government will not spend $60 Million on a fascility without a projected return - Athletics have an ad hoc calendar - especially at a spectator level and the VIS is Below the Line - meaning no spectator representation

the location is linked to 3 prominant arteries linking the South - South/eastern and eastern regions


Interesting how MH were pushed north in Latrobe when their whole bid was anchored on the south east region originally


Rubbish - GOVT wastes money all the time, this money is not a ringing endorsement of the future of SMFC, it is a vote of confidence in football.
The GOVT knows SMFC is incidental to the precinct, it's just a tenant that can easily be replaced by another team if and when the time comes.

You attempt at SPIN is amateurish.

Edited by backfour: 12/12/2012 08:07:20 PM

Edited by backfour: 12/12/2012 08:08:27 PM

Edited by backfour: 12/12/2012 08:09:23 PM
chris
chris
Pro
Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K, Visits: 0
Err so that is why we have exclusivity at the ground or the next 40 and 4.5 million in handouts?

Edited by chris: 12/12/2012 08:30:39 PM
BackFour
BackFour
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K, Visits: 0
chris wrote:
Err so that is why we have exclusivity at the ground or the next 40 and 4.5 million in handouts?

Edited by chris: 12/12/2012 08:30:39 PM


Hmm - what happens if you go broke?
Does the Govt. lose its $60million - no it just gets another tenant.

SMFC is incidental to the investment decision by Government not critical.
Arthur
Arthur
World Class
World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)World Class (5.5K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K, Visits: 0
BackFour wrote:


Hm - I seem to remember SMFC having used exactly the same strategy, - Macdonald from Newcastle seems to ring a bell as a guest player.
BUT You criticize MH for the same thing - very hypocritical or selective memory?


That was in 1977 B4! That's drawing a pretty long bow.

Besides it didn't really work "Long Term".
chris
chris
Pro
Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)Pro (3.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K, Visits: 0
BackFour wrote:
chris wrote:
Err so that is why we have exclusivity at the ground or the next 40 and 4.5 million in handouts?

Edited by chris: 12/12/2012 08:30:39 PM


Hmm - what happens if you go broke?
Does the Govt. lose its $60million - no it just gets another tenant.

SMFC is incidental to the investment decision by Government not critical.


Sounds like a HAL scenario - franchise goes broke - new owner or new team to replace broken one

smfc is a not for profit organisation and has a high level of organisational agility predominantly due to the fact that it is a members run club which is ultimately governed by the members and its community - not investors like the Heart whose licence depends on the pockets of a select few

soon these investors will be dry reaching in their pockets

Unlike a heritage club - MH have an extremely rigid model that will fracture quite easily and readily when stressed even slightly

I think the real threat to many is the fact that a member run club will mean the FFA relinquishes its ownership of intellectual property of the clubs in it's comp

Whilst the innitial totalitarian model by the FFA may have been required to get the HAL to its feet and running - this same approach will surely stun any further development and expansion this game deserves - evidence of this is how the FFA is yet to set up an independent committee to run the HAL - it was the very essence of the Crawford Report and the flare that brought an overhaul to the game at a national level - The FFA has not implemented these changes and is a critical reason along with other changes that are required as to why Australia is now viewed as a Tier 2 Nation with the AFC

evidence of smfc's organisational agility is everywhere - first team to not only accept but implement FFA carriculum updates each time - and will continue to do so

This privatised model has run its course - it set a foundation - it achieved what was required at the time but will stun future growth of the game

smfc or no smfc - the time will come when most clubs need to be run by the community they represent - especially in regional areas where they want their club to be an analogy of the community it represents

Privatised Investment into the franchise model is now thin - there are no cues - no one is lining up to take control of a HAL Licence - the oil reserves have dried up

time for a community model for the next phase of expansion


Edited by chris: 12/12/2012 10:24:53 PM

Edited by chris: 12/12/2012 10:44:29 PM
Heart_fan
Heart_fan
World Class
World Class (8.1K reputation)World Class (8.1K reputation)World Class (8.1K reputation)World Class (8.1K reputation)World Class (8.1K reputation)World Class (8.1K reputation)World Class (8.1K reputation)World Class (8.1K reputation)World Class (8.1K reputation)World Class (8.1K reputation)World Class (8.1K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8K, Visits: 0
Ok, let's just summarise this never ending troll fest and end it there:

- SMFC fans start a thread to try and talk up their own club based on 1 MH crowd
- SMFC and MV fans are united in their opposition to MH, which shows MH may actually be more under their skin than some want to admit
- SMFC fans continue their never ending talk up of their club and how broadbased it is, trying to shoot down any opposition to this concept
- SMFC and MV fans claim MH has no culture or point of difference. People ask what those clubs actually stand for and what they bring to the table? SMFC fans overlook the fact that the value the club could bring to the table is more likely a liability, given the likely inability to adapt without leaving many of their fans disenfranchised. MV fans claim they are the only team in Melbourne so there is no need for MH. Somehow the 2 groups side with each other, even though it goes against the points being made.
- SMFC fans bring up story after story from those joining the anti-MH bandwagon, with new threads for each.
- SMFC fans will not stop until MH are gone, no matter what damage this will do for the sport just to bring forward their own agenda.

And there it is....,




Edited by heart_fan: 12/12/2012 10:25:10 PM
GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search