Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:Did you read the article? Of the 25 million rumoured to have been lost, 11 of that was on GC and 10 on discretionary spending such as marquees. Would LOVE to know how 11 million was lost on Gold Coast United in one year. Especially as that was their last season and they were run on a shoestring. 11 million? Really?
|
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
paulc wrote:Interesting even in the NSL how an mono ethnic club can drag down a broadbased club that has no ethnic ties. No reason why South Melbourne Hellas would not do the same. Quote:Many of the clubs in the National Soccer League were set up by various ethnic groups. The clubs' national allegiances have led to problems in the past, with supporters fighting each other, mirroring tensions in other parts of the world.
In the 90s Soccer Australia attempted to stamp out the problem by renaming the clubs. Thus Melbourne Croatia became the Knights, and South Melbourne Hellas dropped their Greek reference.
Even so, about half of the clubs in the NSL retained their ethnic supporter base. And as the weekend's incident shows, even clean skins - like the five-year-old Perth Glory, with no ethnic affiliations - can be involved in alleged racial incidents. Astounding - Perth Glory involved in racial incidents, and it's the other teams that are to blame. I wonder, when Glory had a good behavior bond hanging over them in 98-99 because fans kept throwing bottles on the pitch, was that the fault of supporters of other teams too?
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
Joffa wrote:cheers, the other disconcerting fact is they want to join on their terms and not be beholden to the same rules as everyone else....because they believe they can do it better. The thing is - we think all teams should be beholden to the same rules - we just feel that some of the rules (ownership of IP, stadium requirements, ownership models) should be different for everyone. - Every A-league team would be better off if they owned their own IP - Many A-League teams would be better off if stadium requirements were lowered thus increasing their options for negotiating better deals. - There would be more options for investors, and therefore more options for expansion, if the ownership model was locked to 100% private investors.
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:I have no doubt they believe that can do it better, and believe with absolute conviction if they get in they WILL do it better, but the ultimate reality is they wont.
And once the cracks start to appear they would never admit fault, they would blame the FFA, the other teams, Heart (even if it were dead), the weather, the economy, Tony Abbott, the marquees, anything other than themselves. Accountability and recognising weakness is not their strong point. Sounds a lot like the excuses we hear for poor Heart crowds. There always seems to be something wrong with the weather. 6,096 yesterday - for a game described by the coach as "make or break", a game they would have been confident of winning, on a beautiful Saturday evening... Even I managed to get along to the bloody game (a rare event), yet still only 6,096. And the excuse..? Perth are bottom of the league..? As if Heart fans only want to see their team play good sides and lose.
|
|
|
Joffa
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:Joffa wrote:cheers, the other disconcerting fact is they want to join on their terms and not be beholden to the same rules as everyone else....because they believe they can do it better. The thing is - we think all teams should be beholden to the same rules - we just feel that some of the rules (ownership of IP, stadium requirements, ownership models) should be different for everyone. - Every A-league team would be better off if they owned their own IP - Many A-League teams would be better off if stadium requirements were lowered thus increasing their options for negotiating better deals. - There would be more options for investors, and therefore more options for expansion, if the ownership model was locked to 100% private investors. Fair enough, except that million plus annual attendances, record sponsorship, record annual turnover, record broadcast tv deals, unprecedented media coverage two consecutive and possibly a third in a row World Cup appearance, hosting AFC Cup and record growth rates in participation would suggest that they probably know what they're doing. Edited by Joffa: 10/2/2013 11:24:20 PM
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:rusty wrote:I have no doubt they believe that can do it better, and believe with absolute conviction if they get in they WILL do it better, but the ultimate reality is they wont.
And once the cracks start to appear they would never admit fault, they would blame the FFA, the other teams, Heart (even if it were dead), the weather, the economy, Tony Abbott, the marquees, anything other than themselves. Accountability and recognising weakness is not their strong point. Sounds a lot like the excuses we hear for poor Heart crowds. There always seems to be something wrong with the weather. 6,096 yesterday - for a game described by the coach as "make or break", a game they would have been confident of winning, on a beautiful Saturday evening... Even I managed to get along to the bloody game (a rare event), yet still only 6,096. And the excuse..? Perth are bottom of the league..? As if Heart fans only want to see their team play good sides and lose. I don't think anyone was expecting a sell out Ben. 6k isn't too shabby for a side bottom of the table and in dissaray, not quite as low as the 3-4k Chris and Arthur were predicting. Will be interesting to see what crowd they get in two weeks time v Sydney.
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
Joffa wrote:Benjamin wrote:Joffa wrote:cheers, the other disconcerting fact is they want to join on their terms and not be beholden to the same rules as everyone else....because they believe they can do it better. The thing is - we think all teams should be beholden to the same rules - we just feel that some of the rules (ownership of IP, stadium requirements, ownership models) should be different for everyone. - Every A-league team would be better off if they owned their own IP - Many A-League teams would be better off if stadium requirements were lowered thus increasing their options for negotiating better deals. - There would be more options for investors, and therefore more options for expansion, if the ownership model was locked to 100% private investors. Fair enough, except that million plus annual attendances, record sponsorship, record annual turnover, record broadcast tv deals, unprecedented media coverage two consecutive and possibly a third in a row World Cup appearance, hosting AFC Cup and record growth rates in participation would suggest that they probably know what they're doing. Fair enough, except failed franchises in North Queensland, Gold Coast and Auckland, failure to launch a previous franchise in West Sydney, the return of licenses in Newcastle, Adelaide, Brisbane and Perth, and the lack of further 'suitable' expansion options, all suggest that things could be done more effectively. As my signature says - the FFA have done a lot right, but that should never stop us looking to improve and should never stop us from being critical when they get it wrong. I'll continue to stand by the point that in the last 6-7 months they've done far more right than wrong, the direction is definitely getting better - and I believe that following the three points I mentioned above would be of massive benefit to the game.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:rusty wrote:I have no doubt they believe that can do it better, and believe with absolute conviction if they get in they WILL do it better, but the ultimate reality is they wont.
And once the cracks start to appear they would never admit fault, they would blame the FFA, the other teams, Heart (even if it were dead), the weather, the economy, Tony Abbott, the marquees, anything other than themselves. Accountability and recognising weakness is not their strong point. Sounds a lot like the excuses we hear for poor Heart crowds. There always seems to be something wrong with the weather. 6,096 yesterday - for a game described by the coach as "make or break", a game they would have been confident of winning, on a beautiful Saturday evening... Even I managed to get along to the bloody game (a rare event), yet still only 6,096. And the excuse..? Perth are bottom of the league..? As if Heart fans only want to see their team play good sides and lose. I don't think anyone was expecting a sell out Ben. 6k isn't too shabby for a side bottom of the table and in dissaray, not quite as low as the 3-4k Chris and Arthur were predicting. Will be interesting to see what crowd they get in two weeks time v Sydney.
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:Benjamin wrote:rusty wrote:I have no doubt they believe that can do it better, and believe with absolute conviction if they get in they WILL do it better, but the ultimate reality is they wont.
And once the cracks start to appear they would never admit fault, they would blame the FFA, the other teams, Heart (even if it were dead), the weather, the economy, Tony Abbott, the marquees, anything other than themselves. Accountability and recognising weakness is not their strong point. Sounds a lot like the excuses we hear for poor Heart crowds. There always seems to be something wrong with the weather. 6,096 yesterday - for a game described by the coach as "make or break", a game they would have been confident of winning, on a beautiful Saturday evening... Even I managed to get along to the bloody game (a rare event), yet still only 6,096. And the excuse..? Perth are bottom of the league..? As if Heart fans only want to see their team play good sides and lose. I don't think anyone was expecting a sell out Ben. 6k isn't too shabby for a side bottom of the table and in dissaray, not quite as low as the 3-4k Chris and Arthur were predicting. Will be interesting to see what crowd they get in two weeks time v Sydney. Would you agree that there is a massive difference between "expecting a sell out" and 7,000-8,000? A number of pages back Joffa and I debated statistics that suggested Heart were heading toward a higher average (non derby) attendance this year than last. At that time I noted that Heart needed crowds of around 6,970 for the remaining 5 games in order to end the season with a higher non-derby average (which would be a good thing). The game against Adelaide produced a crowd of 7,181 - which put them ahead of target, last night's game at 6,069 puts them behind. They now require around 7,300 per game to have grown this season. Very possible - Del Piero, another Adelaide game and a WSW finals chasing showdown could all push in that direction...
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:rusty wrote:Benjamin wrote:rusty wrote:I have no doubt they believe that can do it better, and believe with absolute conviction if they get in they WILL do it better, but the ultimate reality is they wont.
And once the cracks start to appear they would never admit fault, they would blame the FFA, the other teams, Heart (even if it were dead), the weather, the economy, Tony Abbott, the marquees, anything other than themselves. Accountability and recognising weakness is not their strong point. Sounds a lot like the excuses we hear for poor Heart crowds. There always seems to be something wrong with the weather. 6,096 yesterday - for a game described by the coach as "make or break", a game they would have been confident of winning, on a beautiful Saturday evening... Even I managed to get along to the bloody game (a rare event), yet still only 6,096. And the excuse..? Perth are bottom of the league..? As if Heart fans only want to see their team play good sides and lose. I don't think anyone was expecting a sell out Ben. 6k isn't too shabby for a side bottom of the table and in dissaray, not quite as low as the 3-4k Chris and Arthur were predicting. Will be interesting to see what crowd they get in two weeks time v Sydney. Would you agree that there is a massive difference between "expecting a sell out" and 7,000-8,000? A number of pages back Joffa and I debated statistics that suggested Heart were heading toward a higher average (non derby) attendance this year than last. At that time I noted that Heart needed crowds of around 6,970 for the remaining 5 games in order to end the season with a higher non-derby average (which would be a good thing). The game against Adelaide produced a crowd of 7,181 - which put them ahead of target, last night's game at 6,069 puts them behind. They now require around 7,300 per game to have grown this season. Very possible - Del Piero, another Adelaide game and a WSW finals chasing showdown could all push in that direction... Yep I agree Ben Heart are showing positive signs. If they can beat last years average with only one home derby that's not a bad result at all. But hey even if they didn't it wouldn't be the end of the world. Important thing is continue getting positive results and once the Tv deal kicks in next season that should free up some extra money in which to spend on marketing and possibly a big name marquee.
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Joffa wrote:Would you want a club in your league that wants to kill another club to get in, or would you rather a club that wants to get in by growing the game? Interesting Statement, the implication being that SMFC wishes the death of Heart and working towards that out come in an attempt to place themselves in a position to take up the available franchise as second Melbourne A-League team. The SMFC Board of Directors in developing a stratergy for the Club have never stated that as club policy. They wouldn't be able to find the time just for starters The Board clearly is positioning SMFC as a best practice club in Victoria in various areas such as media presentation, internet presence, membership offers and growth, participation in national and international events and junior growth/development. While not limited to these areas the general approach is noted and in conjuction with excellent facilities for player and spectator. Your statement also carries the assumption that SMFC is ready to accept a position in the A-League at the drop of a hat. I have no doubt that the SMFC BoD policy in developing the SMFC brand is to position the Club to be ready for an A-League position long term, short term the Club is looking at fitting into the APL criteria and ideally from general discussions with board members they would like a second tier eastern seaboard competition during the Summer months of course they don't see this happening in the short term. So maybe you need to amend that statement because SMFC is not in the business of bringing down other clubs, SMFC is in the business of running its on affairs. Edited by Arthur: 11/2/2013 08:36:13 AMEdited by Arthur: 11/2/2013 08:37:46 AM
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:paulc wrote:Interesting even in the NSL how an mono ethnic club can drag down a broadbased club that has no ethnic ties. No reason why South Melbourne Hellas would not do the same. Quote:Many of the clubs in the National Soccer League were set up by various ethnic groups. The clubs' national allegiances have led to problems in the past, with supporters fighting each other, mirroring tensions in other parts of the world.
In the 90s Soccer Australia attempted to stamp out the problem by renaming the clubs. Thus Melbourne Croatia became the Knights, and South Melbourne Hellas dropped their Greek reference.
Even so, about half of the clubs in the NSL retained their ethnic supporter base. And as the weekend's incident shows, even clean skins - like the five-year-old Perth Glory, with no ethnic affiliations - can be involved in alleged racial incidents. Astounding - Perth Glory involved in racial incidents, and it's the other teams that are to blame. I wonder, when Glory had a good behavior bond hanging over them in 98-99 because fans kept throwing bottles on the pitch, was that the fault of supporters of other teams too? Throwing of plastic cups by mischievous fans sure ain't anything to do with ethnic violence like inflicted on Bobby Depostovski, Glory and police officials. You should have been in Australia to hear about it Ben.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
On a serious note, while for me part of this has been fun, Melbourne Heart does face serious challenges moving forward.
They have made some mistakes in Brand positioning, the key one being "we are not Victory" and the second one "We will play European Football". There have been some other minor brand positioning stratergies but they have fallen by the wayside.
I think this shows a lack of understanding of Football, the Football market and sticking to a long term philosophy of what they stand for.
I can only offer my opinion on how I would approach the operation of this Franchise if I was in charge.
1. Keep Scott Munn he is doing a great job.
2. Get the fuck out of Latrobe University look at aligning with a VPL or State 1 Club in growing and developing training and social facilities. I would target the Greater city of Dandenong.
3. Let Didiluca go.
4. Generally sign players fo the first team squad between 22yo and 28yo players either in their prime or going into their prime. Recently they have been signing too many players in the over 30yo age bracket.
5. Sign all Visa players from the same country. I would stick to Dutch players to continue on with Va t' Shpi's good work and develop a style of play and technical philosophy that the local players can learn from, and that represents Heart. If not Dutch then Argentinian or Brazilian etc. it will also strengthen comraderie and thesmooth transition of these players.
6. Either sack Aloisi or get him on side to step down and learn more about his craft. Even send him to Spain and Holland for 6 months to a year.
7.Recruit more Victorians, four Victorians in the Senior squad is a serious joke. While the youth players coming through are all from interstate. With the loss of Behich the oppurtunity was there for two Victorian kids to take that full back role. They go and sign a 31 yo journeyman in Coyne. What message does that send to the local football community? How does Postecoglou find Victorians? How did he find Nabbout? Von t ship found Kalmar and yes Heart there are more like him. It appears the Heart coaches are more concerned about CV's and wether a kid has been to the AIS or not.
8. A Marquee, but only a true Marquee, Sibon was not amarquee neither is Fred. If they can't find the right one then will have to do with out.
I hope this helps, from my perspective the Heart should reflect Victorian football the only thing Victorian is they play here.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Ethnic violence seems to always follow at South Melbourne Hellas' home ground it appears. What's going to happen if Hellas play Preston Macedonia in a FFA cup or APL? Quote:Police trawl soccer riot video By Jesse Hogan April 18, 2005 - 3:24PM Supporters watch on as flares are thrown at Bob Jane Stadium last night. Photo: Stefan Gorgievski Police are furious after ethnic-based soccer violence flared again last night during a Victorian Premier League soccer clash between South Melbourne and Preston Lions at Bob Jane Stadium. Four officers received minor injuries in the melee. One person was arrested for assaulting an officer, with police studying video footage to try and make more arrests. Even before play began, 9000 supporters of South Melbourne - which has a mainly Greek fan base - and the predominantly Macedonian Preston Lions were segregated at opposite ends of the stadium, separated by water-filled barriers. Forty-five police and 40 security staff confiscated inflammatory banners and amid chanting and rising tension, delaying kick-off by 15 minutes. A goal from ex-South Melbourne player Steve Manceski was enough for Preston to claim victory against its higher-rated opponent, but the result triggered violence in the stands. At least a dozen flares were thrown onto the pitch after the match, while about 100 supporters of both clubs invaded the pitch after breaking down a fence. The rival supporters also threw coins and darts at each other. Mounted police were used to disperse the crowd. One supporter threw a wheelie bin at a police horse. Acting Superintendent Chris Duthie, who was working at the match, said the behaviour of some fans was "very disappointing". "The police could do little else than try and control the crowd," he said. "If we had have gone in and made numerous arrests we would have lost our personnel," he said. "If it hadn't have been for the police horses, I think we would have lost the day." A match between South Melbourne and Melbourne Knights in the now-defunct National Soccer League in February last year was also marred by crowd violence. Supporters, most of whom supported the Knights, ripped up chairs at Bob Jane Stadium and marched down Clarendon Street in droves after the match, damaging many shops along the way. South Melbourne president George Donikian said it was likely future matches between the two clubs - which had not faced each other in 12 years - would be played away from fans. Acting Superintendent Duthie said extra officers were rostered on as violence was expected. He said he had met representatives of both clubs before the match but was unhappy with the result. "I wasn't satisfied with the fact that there was no guarantees they could control the behaviour of their own fans." He also dismissed suggestions they were unprepared for the violence, saying security officers had been checking patrons' bags while police had been using metal detectors as well. "If you have 200 people that want to riot, it's difficult to have any number of police or security in order to overcome it." Acting Superintendent Duthie will be meeting further with the clubs this week to determine how their will minimise violence in future fixtures between the two clubs. He forecast an alcohol ban at Bob Jane Stadium. "There probably won't be (alcohol available) in the future, because I'm also the licensing inspector for that area." He also said arrangements would have to be made to ensure rival supporters were not using the same toilets, as happened yesterday. The clubs face fines of up to $10,000 over the flare-throwing. Officials from Football Federation Victoria, which runs the Victorian Premier League, will meet to decide on punishment for the clubs. Victorian Soccer Federation chief Tony Pignata told ABC radio the two clubs could be banned from competition. - with AAP http://www.theage.com.au/news/Soccer/Police-trawl-soccer-riot-video/2005/04/18/1113676681119.html Edited by paulc: 11/2/2013 09:17:49 AM
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
Joffa
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K,
Visits: 0
|
Arthur wrote:Joffa wrote:Would you want a club in your league that wants to kill another club to get in, or would you rather a club that wants to get in by growing the game? Interesting Statement, the implication being that SMFC wishes the death of Heart and working towards that out come in an attempt to place themselves in a position to take up the available franchise as second Melbourne A-League team. The SMFC Board of Directors in developing a stratergy for the Club have never stated that as club policy. They wouldn't be able to find the time just for starters The Board clearly is positioning SMFC as a best practice club in Victoria in various areas such as media presentation, internet presence, membership offers and growth, participation in national and international events and junior growth/development. While not limited to these areas the general approach is noted and in conjuction with excellent facilities for player and spectator. Your statement also carries the assumption that SMFC is ready to accept a position in the A-League at the drop of a hat. I have no doubt that the SMFC BoD policy in developing the SMFC brand is to position the Club to be ready for an A-League position long term, short term the Club is looking at fitting into the APL criteria and ideally from general discussions with board members they would like a second tier eastern seaboard competition during the Summer months of course they don't see this happening in the short term. So maybe you need to amend that statement because SMFC is not in the business of bringing down other clubs, SMFC is in the business of running its on affairs. Edited by Arthur: 11/2/2013 08:36:13 AMEdited by Arthur: 11/2/2013 08:37:46 AM True enough Arthur, it is wrong to brand the club for the actions of a few, I agree my Post should read 'some supporters of a club' Thanks for pointing out my error Edited by Joffa: 11/2/2013 09:55:45 AM
|
|
|
f1worldchamp
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Arthur wrote:Joffa wrote:Would you want a club in your league that wants to kill another club to get in, or would you rather a club that wants to get in by growing the game? Interesting Statement, the implication being that SMFC wishes the death of Heart and working towards that out come in an attempt to place themselves in a position to take up the available franchise as second Melbourne A-League team. Isn't that what the thread title says?
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Joffa wrote:Arthur wrote:Joffa wrote:Would you want a club in your league that wants to kill another club to get in, or would you rather a club that wants to get in by growing the game? Interesting Statement, the implication being that SMFC wishes the death of Heart and working towards that out come in an attempt to place themselves in a position to take up the available franchise as second Melbourne A-League team. The SMFC Board of Directors in developing a stratergy for the Club have never stated that as club policy. They wouldn't be able to find the time just for starters The Board clearly is positioning SMFC as a best practice club in Victoria in various areas such as media presentation, internet presence, membership offers and growth, participation in national and international events and junior growth/development. While not limited to these areas the general approach is noted and in conjuction with excellent facilities for player and spectator. Your statement also carries the assumption that SMFC is ready to accept a position in the A-League at the drop of a hat. I have no doubt that the SMFC BoD policy in developing the SMFC brand is to position the Club to be ready for an A-League position long term, short term the Club is looking at fitting into the APL criteria and ideally from general discussions with board members they would like a second tier eastern seaboard competition during the Summer months of course they don't see this happening in the short term. So maybe you need to amend that statement because SMFC is not in the business of bringing down other clubs, SMFC is in the business of running its on affairs. Edited by Arthur: 11/2/2013 08:36:13 AMEdited by Arthur: 11/2/2013 08:37:46 AM True enough Arthur, it is wrong to brand the club for the actions of a few, I agree my Post should read 'some supporters of a club' Thanks for pointing out my error Edited by Joffa: 11/2/2013 09:55:45 AM No Drama Joffa. All of us are susceptible to getting carried away in the heat of the moment on 442 forums.
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
paulc wrote:Ethnic violence seems to always follow at South Melbourne Hellas' home ground it appears. What's going to happen if Hellas play Preston Macedonia in a FFA cup or APL? Quote:Police trawl soccer riot video By Jesse Hogan April 18, 2005 - 3:24PM Supporters watch on as flares are thrown at Bob Jane Stadium last night. Photo: Stefan Gorgievski Police are furious after ethnic-based soccer violence flared again last night during a Victorian Premier League soccer clash between South Melbourne and Preston Lions at Bob Jane Stadium. Four officers received minor injuries in the melee. One person was arrested for assaulting an officer, with police studying video footage to try and make more arrests. Even before play began, 9000 supporters of South Melbourne - which has a mainly Greek fan base - and the predominantly Macedonian Preston Lions were segregated at opposite ends of the stadium, separated by water-filled barriers. Forty-five police and 40 security staff confiscated inflammatory banners and amid chanting and rising tension, delaying kick-off by 15 minutes. A goal from ex-South Melbourne player Steve Manceski was enough for Preston to claim victory against its higher-rated opponent, but the result triggered violence in the stands. At least a dozen flares were thrown onto the pitch after the match, while about 100 supporters of both clubs invaded the pitch after breaking down a fence. The rival supporters also threw coins and darts at each other. Mounted police were used to disperse the crowd. One supporter threw a wheelie bin at a police horse. Acting Superintendent Chris Duthie, who was working at the match, said the behaviour of some fans was "very disappointing". "The police could do little else than try and control the crowd," he said. "If we had have gone in and made numerous arrests we would have lost our personnel," he said. "If it hadn't have been for the police horses, I think we would have lost the day." A match between South Melbourne and Melbourne Knights in the now-defunct National Soccer League in February last year was also marred by crowd violence. Supporters, most of whom supported the Knights, ripped up chairs at Bob Jane Stadium and marched down Clarendon Street in droves after the match, damaging many shops along the way. South Melbourne president George Donikian said it was likely future matches between the two clubs - which had not faced each other in 12 years - would be played away from fans. Acting Superintendent Duthie said extra officers were rostered on as violence was expected. He said he had met representatives of both clubs before the match but was unhappy with the result. "I wasn't satisfied with the fact that there was no guarantees they could control the behaviour of their own fans." He also dismissed suggestions they were unprepared for the violence, saying security officers had been checking patrons' bags while police had been using metal detectors as well. "If you have 200 people that want to riot, it's difficult to have any number of police or security in order to overcome it." Acting Superintendent Duthie will be meeting further with the clubs this week to determine how their will minimise violence in future fixtures between the two clubs. He forecast an alcohol ban at Bob Jane Stadium. "There probably won't be (alcohol available) in the future, because I'm also the licensing inspector for that area." He also said arrangements would have to be made to ensure rival supporters were not using the same toilets, as happened yesterday. The clubs face fines of up to $10,000 over the flare-throwing. Officials from Football Federation Victoria, which runs the Victorian Premier League, will meet to decide on punishment for the clubs. Victorian Soccer Federation chief Tony Pignata told ABC radio the two clubs could be banned from competition. - with AAP http://www.theage.com.au/news/Soccer/Police-trawl-soccer-riot-video/2005/04/18/1113676681119.html Edited by paulc: 11/2/2013 09:17:49 AM Harden the F#@! up Paul a good soccer riot never hurt any body.  While you relate it to be ethnic violence, how is it people from these backgrounds live together in the same neighbourhoods, work together for the same companys even dare I say it inter marry. Do we walk down the street and see another of a different background and decide to punch on? Well we don't. What happened at the South/Preston match as with the Victory/Heart match was about oppurtunity. The oppurtunity to act like a dickhead with minimal chance of getting caught and punished. To say otherwise is to take a recist view that the commentators of other codes use to blacken our game, as per Johnny Warren's "Sheilas, Wogs and Poofters". Edited by Arthur: 11/2/2013 11:41:40 AM
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
f1worldchamp wrote:Arthur wrote:Joffa wrote:Would you want a club in your league that wants to kill another club to get in, or would you rather a club that wants to get in by growing the game? Interesting Statement, the implication being that SMFC wishes the death of Heart and working towards that out come in an attempt to place themselves in a position to take up the available franchise as second Melbourne A-League team. Isn't that what the thread title says? Do you believe everything you read? And as discussed with Joffa, is it an official position of SMFC? Are we to take everything written by a football supporter on this forum as the policy of the club or franchise they support?
|
|
|
Krackovich
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
paulc wrote:Ethnic violence seems to always follow at South Melbourne Hellas' home ground it appears. What's going to happen if Hellas play Preston Macedonia in a FFA cup or APL? Quote:Police trawl soccer riot video By Jesse Hogan April 18, 2005 - 3:24PM Supporters watch on as flares are thrown at Bob Jane Stadium last night. Photo: Stefan Gorgievski Police are furious after ethnic-based soccer violence flared again last night during a Victorian Premier League soccer clash between South Melbourne and Preston Lions at Bob Jane Stadium. Four officers received minor injuries in the melee. One person was arrested for assaulting an officer, with police studying video footage to try and make more arrests. Even before play began, 9000 supporters of South Melbourne - which has a mainly Greek fan base - and the predominantly Macedonian Preston Lions were segregated at opposite ends of the stadium, separated by water-filled barriers. Forty-five police and 40 security staff confiscated inflammatory banners and amid chanting and rising tension, delaying kick-off by 15 minutes. A goal from ex-South Melbourne player Steve Manceski was enough for Preston to claim victory against its higher-rated opponent, but the result triggered violence in the stands. At least a dozen flares were thrown onto the pitch after the match, while about 100 supporters of both clubs invaded the pitch after breaking down a fence. The rival supporters also threw coins and darts at each other. Mounted police were used to disperse the crowd. One supporter threw a wheelie bin at a police horse. Acting Superintendent Chris Duthie, who was working at the match, said the behaviour of some fans was "very disappointing". "The police could do little else than try and control the crowd," he said. "If we had have gone in and made numerous arrests we would have lost our personnel," he said. "If it hadn't have been for the police horses, I think we would have lost the day." A match between South Melbourne and Melbourne Knights in the now-defunct National Soccer League in February last year was also marred by crowd violence. Supporters, most of whom supported the Knights, ripped up chairs at Bob Jane Stadium and marched down Clarendon Street in droves after the match, damaging many shops along the way. South Melbourne president George Donikian said it was likely future matches between the two clubs - which had not faced each other in 12 years - would be played away from fans. Acting Superintendent Duthie said extra officers were rostered on as violence was expected. He said he had met representatives of both clubs before the match but was unhappy with the result. "I wasn't satisfied with the fact that there was no guarantees they could control the behaviour of their own fans." He also dismissed suggestions they were unprepared for the violence, saying security officers had been checking patrons' bags while police had been using metal detectors as well. "If you have 200 people that want to riot, it's difficult to have any number of police or security in order to overcome it." Acting Superintendent Duthie will be meeting further with the clubs this week to determine how their will minimise violence in future fixtures between the two clubs. He forecast an alcohol ban at Bob Jane Stadium. "There probably won't be (alcohol available) in the future, because I'm also the licensing inspector for that area." He also said arrangements would have to be made to ensure rival supporters were not using the same toilets, as happened yesterday. The clubs face fines of up to $10,000 over the flare-throwing. Officials from Football Federation Victoria, which runs the Victorian Premier League, will meet to decide on punishment for the clubs. Victorian Soccer Federation chief Tony Pignata told ABC radio the two clubs could be banned from competition. - with AAP http://www.theage.com.au/news/Soccer/Police-trawl-soccer-riot-video/2005/04/18/1113676681119.html Such blatant disregard for Melbourne Heart's sports science facilties [-x
|
|
|
GCU till I die
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 472,
Visits: 0
|
tbitm wrote:SouthFan wrote:
I fail to see the relevance of your example when the aleague is again on track to lose between 25-30 million (even after an increased 2.5m dividend).
I'm pretty sure this stat is wrong, last year 17 million was lost and it is believed that 10 million or so was lost by GCU. Would love to know where anyone get's the idea GCU lost $10m last season.
|
|
|
GCU till I die
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 472,
Visits: 0
|
Joffa wrote:Would you want a club in your league that wants to kill another club to get in, or would you rather a club that wants to get in by growing the game? Sounds Good Joffa, But did the Heart mob shed a tear over the notion that they were manufactured and implanted over the top of existing real clubs ? Or given that promotion/relegation has been banned. How are a clubs fans supposed to vent their aspirations ? Edited by GCU till I die: 11/2/2013 12:45:31 PM
|
|
|
Red_or_Dead
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1K,
Visits: 0
|
Arthur wrote:Joffa wrote:Would you want a club in your league that wants to kill another club to get in, or would you rather a club that wants to get in by growing the game? Interesting Statement, the implication being that SMFC wishes the death of Heart and working towards that out come in an attempt to place themselves in a position to take up the available franchise as second Melbourne A-League team. The SMFC Board of Directors in developing a stratergy for the Club have never stated that as club policy. They wouldn't be able to find the time just for starters The Board clearly is positioning SMFC as a best practice club in Victoria in various areas such as media presentation, internet presence, membership offers and growth, participation in national and international events and junior growth/development. While not limited to these areas the general approach is noted and in conjuction with excellent facilities for player and spectator. Your statement also carries the assumption that SMFC is ready to accept a position in the A-League at the drop of a hat.I have no doubt that the SMFC BoD policy in developing the SMFC brand is to position the Club to be ready for an A-League position long term, short term the Club is looking at fitting into the APL criteria and ideally from general discussions with board members they would like a second tier eastern seaboard competition during the Summer months of course they don't see this happening in the short term. So maybe you need to amend that statement because SMFC is not in the business of bringing down other clubs, SMFC is in the business of running its on affairs. HAHAHAHA but their fans are :lol: as if the bolded lines aren't the two most hypocritical statements on a thread where its title is "[crowd#] Heart OUT -> SMFC IN"!?! LOL :lol: :lol: :lol:
|
|
|
Joffa
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K,
Visits: 0
|
GCU till I die wrote:Joffa wrote:Would you want a club in your league that wants to kill another club to get in, or would you rather a club that wants to get in by growing the game? Sounds Good Joffa, But did the Heart mob shed a tear over the notion that they were manufactured and implanted over the top of existing real clubs ? Or given that promotion/relegation has been banned. How are a clubs fans supposed to vent their aspirations ? Edited by GCU till I die: 11/2/2013 12:45:31 PM Hang on a minute South Melbourne have had two chances to submit bids to join the A-League and are yet to submit a tender for a licence...in fact the Southern Cross bid which is exactly the same as Heart ie another club coming in over the top was supported by South Melbourne. Double standards much?
|
|
|
Red_or_Dead
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1K,
Visits: 0
|
Krackovich wrote:paulc wrote:Ethnic violence seems to always follow at South Melbourne Hellas' home ground it appears. What's going to happen if Hellas play Preston Macedonia in a FFA cup or APL? Quote:Police trawl soccer riot video By Jesse Hogan April 18, 2005 - 3:24PM Police are furious after ethnic-based soccer violence flared again last night during a Victorian Premier League soccer clash between South Melbourne and Preston Lions at Bob Jane Stadium. Four officers received minor injuries in the melee. ... One supporter threw a wheelie bin at a police horse.... A match between South Melbourne and Melbourne Knights in the now-defunct National Soccer League in February last year was also marred by crowd violence. Supporters, most of whom supported the Knights, ripped up chairs at Bob Jane Stadium and marched down Clarendon Street in droves after the match, damaging many shops along the way. ... http://www.theage.com.au/news/Soccer/Police-trawl-soccer-riot-video/2005/04/18/1113676681119.html Such blatant disregard for Melbourne Heart's sports science facilties [-x =d> :p
|
|
|
krisskrash
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 465,
Visits: 0
|
So if we use the logic of Red or Dead, we can say all Heart fans endorse fans ripping out chairs and throwing them on the pitch because Facebook groups started by certain Heart fans state this?
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
paulc wrote:Ethnic violence seems to always follow at South Melbourne Hellas' home ground it appears. What's going to happen if Hellas play Preston Macedonia in a FFA cup or APL? Quote:Police trawl soccer riot video By Jesse Hogan April 18, 2005 - 3:24PM Supporters watch on as flares are thrown at Bob Jane Stadium last night. Photo: Stefan Gorgievski Police are furious after ethnic-based soccer violence flared again last night during a Victorian Premier League soccer clash between South Melbourne and Preston Lions at Bob Jane Stadium. Four officers received minor injuries in the melee. One person was arrested for assaulting an officer, with police studying video footage to try and make more arrests. Even before play began, 9000 supporters of South Melbourne - which has a mainly Greek fan base - and the predominantly Macedonian Preston Lions were segregated at opposite ends of the stadium, separated by water-filled barriers. Forty-five police and 40 security staff confiscated inflammatory banners and amid chanting and rising tension, delaying kick-off by 15 minutes. A goal from ex-South Melbourne player Steve Manceski was enough for Preston to claim victory against its higher-rated opponent, but the result triggered violence in the stands. At least a dozen flares were thrown onto the pitch after the match, while about 100 supporters of both clubs invaded the pitch after breaking down a fence. The rival supporters also threw coins and darts at each other. Mounted police were used to disperse the crowd. One supporter threw a wheelie bin at a police horse. Acting Superintendent Chris Duthie, who was working at the match, said the behaviour of some fans was "very disappointing". "The police could do little else than try and control the crowd," he said. "If we had have gone in and made numerous arrests we would have lost our personnel," he said. "If it hadn't have been for the police horses, I think we would have lost the day." A match between South Melbourne and Melbourne Knights in the now-defunct National Soccer League in February last year was also marred by crowd violence. Supporters, most of whom supported the Knights, ripped up chairs at Bob Jane Stadium and marched down Clarendon Street in droves after the match, damaging many shops along the way. South Melbourne president George Donikian said it was likely future matches between the two clubs - which had not faced each other in 12 years - would be played away from fans. Acting Superintendent Duthie said extra officers were rostered on as violence was expected. He said he had met representatives of both clubs before the match but was unhappy with the result. "I wasn't satisfied with the fact that there was no guarantees they could control the behaviour of their own fans." He also dismissed suggestions they were unprepared for the violence, saying security officers had been checking patrons' bags while police had been using metal detectors as well. "If you have 200 people that want to riot, it's difficult to have any number of police or security in order to overcome it." Acting Superintendent Duthie will be meeting further with the clubs this week to determine how their will minimise violence in future fixtures between the two clubs. He forecast an alcohol ban at Bob Jane Stadium. "There probably won't be (alcohol available) in the future, because I'm also the licensing inspector for that area." He also said arrangements would have to be made to ensure rival supporters were not using the same toilets, as happened yesterday. The clubs face fines of up to $10,000 over the flare-throwing. Officials from Football Federation Victoria, which runs the Victorian Premier League, will meet to decide on punishment for the clubs. Victorian Soccer Federation chief Tony Pignata told ABC radio the two clubs could be banned from competition. - with AAP http://www.theage.com.au/news/Soccer/Police-trawl-soccer-riot-video/2005/04/18/1113676681119.html Edited by paulc: 11/2/2013 09:17:49 AM Continually re-printing the same article from 8 years ago doesn't make it a frequent occurrence. If I were to re-print articles about the seat smashing at Etihad would that make it a regular thing? As for the cup/bottle throwing a Glory - you appear to think this is minor and not worth mentioning, yet SA felt it was worthy of a good behavior bond back in 98.
|
|
|
f1worldchamp
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Arthur wrote:f1worldchamp wrote:Arthur wrote:Joffa wrote:Would you want a club in your league that wants to kill another club to get in, or would you rather a club that wants to get in by growing the game? Interesting Statement, the implication being that SMFC wishes the death of Heart and working towards that out come in an attempt to place themselves in a position to take up the available franchise as second Melbourne A-League team. Isn't that what the thread title says? Do you believe everything you read? And as discussed with Joffa, is it an official position of SMFC? Are we to take everything written by a football supporter on this forum as the policy of the club or franchise they support? Well, you tell me. The thread title was written by chris, who purports to speak on the behalf of SMFC, and has done so on many occasions. So either yes, this is the official position of SMFC or chris and all his claims of inside knowledge on the workings of SMFC are crap.
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Red_or_Dead wrote:Arthur wrote:Joffa wrote:Would you want a club in your league that wants to kill another club to get in, or would you rather a club that wants to get in by growing the game? Interesting Statement, the implication being that SMFC wishes the death of Heart and working towards that out come in an attempt to place themselves in a position to take up the available franchise as second Melbourne A-League team. The SMFC Board of Directors in developing a stratergy for the Club have never stated that as club policy. They wouldn't be able to find the time just for starters The Board clearly is positioning SMFC as a best practice club in Victoria in various areas such as media presentation, internet presence, membership offers and growth, participation in national and international events and junior growth/development. While not limited to these areas the general approach is noted and in conjuction with excellent facilities for player and spectator. Your statement also carries the assumption that SMFC is ready to accept a position in the A-League at the drop of a hat.I have no doubt that the SMFC BoD policy in developing the SMFC brand is to position the Club to be ready for an A-League position long term, short term the Club is looking at fitting into the APL criteria and ideally from general discussions with board members they would like a second tier eastern seaboard competition during the Summer months of course they don't see this happening in the short term. So maybe you need to amend that statement because SMFC is not in the business of bringing down other clubs, SMFC is in the business of running its on affairs. HAHAHAHA but their fans are :lol: as if the bolded lines aren't the two most hypocritical statements on a thread where its title is "[crowd#] Heart OUT -> SMFC IN"!?! LOL :lol: :lol: :lol: You seem more prepared to discuss matters in a fool hardy and disrespectful manner thats fine if you are saying that the title alone is enough to upset you then you would expect that you would present a more serious retort. While using my quote as your reference point, I can assure you a more fair and honest assesment you will not find. Even assesing Heart's situation, except in circumsatnaces of humour I have offered an honest assesment of the issues facing them. So if you want an honest debate I am here, if you prefer to act like the hooligans at Etihad go ahead it only makes your point of view weaker.
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
f1worldchamp wrote:Arthur wrote:f1worldchamp wrote:Arthur wrote:Joffa wrote:Would you want a club in your league that wants to kill another club to get in, or would you rather a club that wants to get in by growing the game? Interesting Statement, the implication being that SMFC wishes the death of Heart and working towards that out come in an attempt to place themselves in a position to take up the available franchise as second Melbourne A-League team. Isn't that what the thread title says? Do you believe everything you read? And as discussed with Joffa, is it an official position of SMFC? Are we to take everything written by a football supporter on this forum as the policy of the club or franchise they support? Well, you tell me. The thread title was written by chris, who purports to speak on the behalf of SMFC, and has done so on many occasions. So either yes, this is the official position of SMFC or chris and all his claims of inside knowledge on the workings of SMFC are crap. You can't be serious, I can tell you this much, when SMFC wants to announce a policy or details about its stratergy you can find them on the website there aren't that many secrets.
|
|
|