Needs something after they stopped letting her stick the boot in to an 'accelerator'

Best call ever

Rektbecca Wilson.

A person pictured lost their job according to ultras mentality facebook. Also when she was sen the hosts never asked her why did she put pictures of an underage person on the front page considering its illegal to do so. And they didnt ask why the ffa dont have an appeals board.

That is fucking amazing =d>

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/red-card-the-banned-football-fans-from-10-a-league-clubs/story-fni0cx12-1227618277879

Galleries of fans now taken down. Something is happening behind the scenes and it's about to get good.

just spoke to one of the editors at the daily telegraph and told her of a great front story. Pics of all nrl players who have assaulted their girlfriends/wives........didn't go down too well

I despise Wilson as much as everyone else - but play the ball, not the wo(man). Everyone keeps bringing up her drink driving charge rather than her incompetent 'journalism'.

No fuck her. She's made a living by writing horrid things about people and creating divides in society. Fair game to do the same. She should be have her credibility constantly attacked and hounded until she no longer feels comfortable in the public sphere anymore.

when she claims her motivation is public safety then she deserves it.

Glass houses. Over 90% of those "named and shamed" have no criminal charges against them. She does.

Question

The 198 are banned for various reasons and for various time periods?

SOME (a very small some) of those are banned for violence issues, most are not.

The NRL have a number of players who have been Convicted and jailed for Violent issues, some of those have been signed almost the minute they walk out of jail and are playing in the NRL again. These animals (grubs insert whichever label the NSW Police force gives us football fans) are allowed to enter the stadium and play. How come those players who have a history of violence are allowed?

Also, we know that every sport has its ass hats. Visit the photo gallery of "fear of a round ball" on facebook to see huge bundle of AFL and NRL violence.

My question is - do the NRL ban there trouble makers. Some of the A-league bans were 2yrs for entering the field.
Hardly inciting a riot. But is the difference she states also due to the fact that NRL fans are just boys having fun.

Would be Ironic if true as she claims FFA do nothing. Wonder what NRL do???

#DrinkDrivingIsACrime

That's the issue. NRL/Cricket/AFL don't ban their fans. They may be ejected, but they're back the next week.

but RW turns it into a "football has a problem" rhetoric

Exactly, the RBT comments are playground stuff.

Journalism is a vitally important part of society.

To say "you can't comment on public safety because you did something dangerous in the past"

If 's she's right she's right, if not, sue her.

The RBT comments are fair.

These publications are branding these individuals as criminals. As her interview suggested, she justified publishing the faces of these people by claiming that they were a danger to society. If that is why the names and faces were released then her 'Shame File' should be made public as well.

A can of worms has been opened.

If she thinks it's OK that banned football fans have no appeal rights and agreeing that crowd trouble in the A-League is akin to terrorism in France, then I think it's OK to bring up her RBT records. She and the media have never shown any morals, we can play their game too. I've learnt that whether we do good or bad, we're still all going to get tarnished with the same soccer hooligan brush.

A podcast of her speech on sky is up now http://podcast.skynews.com.au/sportsline.xml#sthash.qBJEGvUG.dpuf

starts at 22.00 mins

Edited by scotty21: 25/11/2015 12:49:03 PM

hope something happens with this
she has done it too many times time for to go

...seeking an epilogue to Wilson's article, we asked the watchdogs: what happened? As is often the case with information law breaches, the answer was: not much. Though not nothing.

http://www.canberratimes.com.au/national/public-service/a-private-epilogue-what-happened-after-aleagues-banned-fan-list-was-leaked-20161031-gser0y.html

Interesting. I like to know how many racing spectators were declared louts, unruly and criminals during the Melbourne Cup with their names splattered front page of the papers.

Here's one fashion criminal who has been extensively featured:



Is she losing her mind? Did she dress in all white because she thought she was going to be married to someone? IN any event let's hope the fashion police take stern and swift action.

In any event she fell over giving rise potential "beaver" shots for the photographers on hand...



http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/spring-racing/gina-rinehart-makes-rare-appearance-at-melbourne-cup/news-story/4028a245f882e85814b898f15025e257

Australias shame
more like , just a few fillies and larrikans having a bit too much.... no worries says susie o brien

http://www.news.com.au/sport/superracing/melbourne-cup/us-slams-australia-for-decadent-and-depraved-cup/news-story/6bc7e8d310a1eb2b007f8cd87d980134

"US slams Australia" 

:laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:

Boys will be boys says the chief police commissioner to everything except when it comes to sockah.

shhhhh, just tell me about flares at the wanderers games.

"The police on site were reluctant to comment on crowd behaviour, saying that it’s hard to ascertain the overall behaviour when you’ve been stationed in one spot all day".

Of course they were reluctant, it's not sockah after all.

Seagull capital of the world......