TheCritic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 41,
Visits: 0
|
Odly enough, i think i still have the same amount of posts, so maybe it ran away?
|
|
|
|
socceroos_fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
:? I'm scared.
|
|
|
Heineken
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K,
Visits: 0
|
Best: Fish and Chips for Dinner Best: Spent from 7.30-2.30 today Painting the entire back lower half of the house by myself. Exhausted!!! Worst: Covered in dried paint and sweat. I probably should have a shower, but i CBFd :lol:
WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!

|
|
|
Funky Munky
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
Best: Vodka Best: Fanta Best: Coke Best: The greenest of grass
Best: All at once, preferably.
|
|
|
Benjo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Best: finally asked out the girl I liked Worst: She said she'll think about it-which translates as no
|
|
|
imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjo wrote:Best: finally asked out the girl I liked Worst: She said she'll think about it-which translates as no Nice work man. Even if its a no, you've got it off your mind now. I bet you feel a lot better.
|
|
|
Funky Munky
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
Benj mate, how old are you, and how old is she? You're both still kids (no offence). She's probably just as shy about this as you were. Give her time. "I'll think about it" isn't a no.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
socceroos_fan wrote:Quote:socceroos_fan wrote:real Apple iPod earphones for $2 Bargains.
I would prefer in ear headphones over those any day, the sound quality is far superior and you can get some decent ones for $15 I don't like in ear headphones and other brand headphones make the sound less superior. Ok, the deal with in-ear headphones: They have no noise cancelation, so you have to have them up much louder than on hear headphones to head as clearly. This results in distortion and aural damage, whether they're in your ear canal or sitting in the outer ear. You should buy on-ear headphones. you'll thank me in fifteen years when you still have your hearing. Benjo - don't worry mate. It'll all be good. She didn't say no. No worries. Edited by afromanGT: 25/11/2009 08:53:36 PM
|
|
|
socceroos_fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:socceroos_fan wrote:Quote:socceroos_fan wrote:real Apple iPod earphones for $2 Bargains.
I would prefer in ear headphones over those any day, the sound quality is far superior and you can get some decent ones for $15 I don't like in ear headphones and other brand headphones make the sound less superior. Ok, the deal with in-ear headphones: They have no noise cancelation, so you have to have them up much louder than on hear headphones to head as clearly. This results in distortion and aural damage, whether they're in your ear canal or sitting in the outer ear. You should buy on-ear headphones. you'll thank me in fifteen years when you still have your hearing. Yeh exactly. On ear FTW!
|
|
|
avy1990
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
In-ear >>>>>> All others.
|
|
|
TheCritic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 41,
Visits: 0
|
avy1990 wrote:In-ear >>>>>> All others. +1
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
avy1990 wrote:In-ear >>>>>> All others. How? There are no benefits to in-ear headphones.
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:avy1990 wrote:In-ear >>>>>> All others. How? There are no benefits to in-ear headphones. Yeah you can't hear the other fuckwits around you without turning it up full blast like you do with on-ear headphones. I'd call that a benefit.
|
|
|
imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
Over-Ear headphones block out everything. :lol: They rock.
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
imnofreak wrote:Over-Ear headphones block out everything. :lol: They rock. But you look like a fucking idiot out in public with them:lol: :lol:
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:afromanGT wrote:avy1990 wrote:In-ear >>>>>> All others. How? There are no benefits to in-ear headphones. Yeah you can't hear the other fuckwits around you without turning it up full blast like you do with on-ear headphones. I'd call that a benefit. You've got no idea what you're talking about. In ear headphones are the ones that you have to turn up to ridiculous volume. You have three kinds of headphones: on hear headphones in ear headphones in ear-canal headphones Now, because on ear headphones have noise cancellation from cupping your ears, they do not have to be up as loud in volume cancelling street noise etc, thus you're a) not sharing your music with everybody around you, and b) not having extreme volumes of air pressure hititng your eardrum. In ear headphones share your music around, and people listen on them waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay to loud because it doesn't cancel out background noise. Your average street noise is 70db, you have to have +6db on top of that to be able to hear clearly, so you're listening at almost 80db, which is as loud as a lawnmower, for long periods of time. Now consider what that will do to your hearing. In ear canal headphones are the worst. Because they're pressed into your eardrum, the pressure builds up over the period listening. You're going to cause cramping to the muscles in your ear and damage the cochlear long-term. Edited by afromanGT: 25/11/2009 10:35:23 PM
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
My mistake got my types of headphones mixed up because I honestly couldn't give a fuck which headphones are better or worse.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:My mistake got my types of headphones mixed up because I honestly couldn't give a fuck which headphones are better or worse. Who really needs their hearing anyway?
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:sydneycroatia58 wrote:My mistake got my types of headphones mixed up because I honestly couldn't give a fuck which headphones are better or worse. Who really needs their hearing anyway? You basically have no hearing when you're wearing on ear headphones anyway since it cancels out every other sound except your music.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:afromanGT wrote:sydneycroatia58 wrote:My mistake got my types of headphones mixed up because I honestly couldn't give a fuck which headphones are better or worse. Who really needs their hearing anyway? You basically have no hearing when you're wearing on ear headphones anyway since it cancels out every other sound except your music. Which you do when you have your in-ear headphones at a loud enough volume to drown out backing noise anyway. The damage that in ear headphones do will mean you'll be at the very least strugglingt o hear, if not 90% deaf by the time you're 60.
|
|
|
avy1990
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:I honestly couldn't give a fuck which headphones are better or worse. Exactly. I have my opinion on what I personally like, I couldnt give a fuck if this type will stop noise or if this pair will kill me. I like the in-ear ones.
|
|
|
martyB
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Four actually. Anyway, earphones are best for when doing exercise and the over ear headphones are best for high quality reproduction and just chilling. For me, I enjoy my music and need to have good quality sound - so I use headphones. Though, the Sennheiser earphones that came with my iRiver are fucking brilliant - way better than any Sony, TDK or Panasonic ones I've tested since. Edited by martyB: 26/11/2009 12:31:19 AM
|
|
|
martyB
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Best: BreadTop - *drools* - Sydney people, you definitely need to get to one: cheap and fucking delicious pastries and the like. Whoever had the balls to put a frankfurt in a croissant was smoking some good shit coz it fucking rocks. Worst: Car turned 100,000. I even videoed this monumental occasion. :P
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
Quote:Anyway, earphones are best for when doing exercise and the over ear headphones are best for high quality reproduction and just chilling. I prefer on ears then. In ears come out unless you tape them. Quote:Whoever had the balls to put a frankfurt in a croissant was smoking some good shit coz it fucking rocks. I've been doing that for years. :lol: :cool: tastes awesome. Quote:Worst: Car turned 100,000. I even videoed this monumental occasion. Too much time on your hands? :lol:
|
|
|
martyB
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Quote:I prefer on ears then. In ears come out unless you tape them. Earphones only come out if they're carrying the weight of a massively long cord, the remote, or if they're shitty/cheap, unergonomical ones. Otherwise your ears must be deformed. And on-ear headphones are so 90s, so I guess you're ahead of the fashion. :P
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
martyB wrote:Quote:I prefer on ears then. In ears come out unless you tape them. Earphones only come out if they're carrying the weight of a massively long cord, the remote, or if they're shitty/cheap, unergonomical ones. Otherwise your ears must be deformed. And on-ear headphones are so 90s, so I guess you're ahead of the fashion. :P They tend to get pulled out by my mp3 player jiggling in my pocket, and I don't want to buy an armband. On ears are kinda 90's, but they do the job. They'll be back too, like navel-height jeans :lol:
|
|
|
socceroos_fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
:lol: That video would be so much better if you had to brake suddenly...Then missed it :P I know that road as well...It's the 'M' something? :P
|
|
|
Funky Munky
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
Best: CRICKETS BAAAAAAAAAAAAACK!!! LOVE IT SO MUCH.
|
|
|
avy1990
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Funky Munky wrote:Best: CRICKETS BAAAAAAAAAAAAACK!!! LOVE IT SO MUCH. \:d/ SO GOOD!!!!!! Fucking Watson
|
|
|
Forestman
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Bad. I have this incredibly stupid receptionist whose a relative of one of the partners in this firm.
|
|
|