|
Waz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
Apparently so lolitsbigmic
But then Roar were releasing a player mid season who was wanted for ACL. Expensive mistake.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midfielder
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
If the timing of the expansion teams coincides with when the Nix have to met their target metrics and they don't... it will solve a lot of issues for FFA.
Second Brisbane, Third Sydney and Third Melbourne.
|
|
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x
Waz has predicted for a while on these boards that the two teams to come in in 2018-19 will be from Sydney and Brisbane, and it's looking like he is right.
There is no expansion in 2018-19. Gallop has ruled it out There may be a new 'Deloitte' business model in 2018-19 and depending how that goes they'll look at maybe 2 expansion afterwards at some point. Still got to find a replacement for Phoenix first I think he ruled out expansion for this coming season, so I am still expecting the inclusion of two new teams in 2018-19. Gallop says its first step will be to move to 12 teams – although it is yet to release A-League licence expansion criteria, a result of the governance negotiations dropping a spanner in the game’s cogs. After that, he says, a 14, even 16 team competition seems viable – “but that is long-term ambition,” he says, later clarifying that even a 12-team competition wouldn’t happen until after the new, still-in-negotiation operating model comes into effect for the 2018-19 season. https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/may/15/football-in-australia-as-big-as-its-going-to-get?CMP=share_btn_tw Read that carefully and it's ambiguous (intentionally so I would think). We all know the Fox agreement allows for the expansion of two clubs in 2018-19, although I agree with one of your posts above that Fox will control that process 100% and will only fork out the extra money if it's the two teams Fox wants - I have no problem believing that at all (and thus why the bidders are pitching to Fox, and also why we can completely ignore 80% of the bids we've heard about to date). You think FFA will introduce a new Business model plus maybe 3 new teams in one swoop ? I'll wager a slab of your shitty VB on that Ha - I don't drink! Look, anything is possible, but we both agree that Fox controls the show now, and we know what the Fox TV deal says - so if the right teams appear on the horizon (as far as Fox is concerned), then I think they would proceed with what the TV deal says, afterall, they are only paying $2.8 million extra per new team, so that's pretty good value for money from their perspective. That's implying that is the truth regarding the deal. Do you have a link?
|
|
|
|
pippinu
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x
Waz has predicted for a while on these boards that the two teams to come in in 2018-19 will be from Sydney and Brisbane, and it's looking like he is right.
There is no expansion in 2018-19. Gallop has ruled it out There may be a new 'Deloitte' business model in 2018-19 and depending how that goes they'll look at maybe 2 expansion afterwards at some point. Still got to find a replacement for Phoenix first I think he ruled out expansion for this coming season, so I am still expecting the inclusion of two new teams in 2018-19. Gallop says its first step will be to move to 12 teams – although it is yet to release A-League licence expansion criteria, a result of the governance negotiations dropping a spanner in the game’s cogs. After that, he says, a 14, even 16 team competition seems viable – “but that is long-term ambition,” he says, later clarifying that even a 12-team competition wouldn’t happen until after the new, still-in-negotiation operating model comes into effect for the 2018-19 season. https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/may/15/football-in-australia-as-big-as-its-going-to-get?CMP=share_btn_tw Read that carefully and it's ambiguous (intentionally so I would think). We all know the Fox agreement allows for the expansion of two clubs in 2018-19, although I agree with one of your posts above that Fox will control that process 100% and will only fork out the extra money if it's the two teams Fox wants - I have no problem believing that at all (and thus why the bidders are pitching to Fox, and also why we can completely ignore 80% of the bids we've heard about to date). You think FFA will introduce a new Business model plus maybe 3 new teams in one swoop ? I'll wager a slab of your shitty VB on that Ha - I don't drink! Look, anything is possible, but we both agree that Fox controls the show now, and we know what the Fox TV deal says - so if the right teams appear on the horizon (as far as Fox is concerned), then I think they would proceed with what the TV deal says, afterall, they are only paying $2.8 million extra per new team, so that's pretty good value for money from their perspective. That's implying that is the truth regarding the deal. Do you have a link? It's old news now, it has been reported many times. This is how I was able to do up this spreadsheet, by going through multiple articles, but rarely did they show the full picture, you had to take bits and pieces from many articles. Waz has gone through it and thinks it's pretty close to the mark. I'm pretty confident that we will have two new teams in 2018-19 - that is one item where the reporting has been pretty consistent (in relation to the TV deal). | Break down of six year TV deal ($346M) | Cash component ($M) | Non-cash | Total | | | Base Cash | 2 new teams | Incentives | Contra | Cash & non | | Year 1 | 44.5 | | | 6 | 50.5 | | Year 2 | 44.5 | 5.6 | | 6 | 56.1 | | Year 3 | 44.5 | 5.6 | | 6 | 56.1 | | Year 4 | 44.5 | 5.6 | | 6 | 56.1 | | Year 5 | 44.5 | 5.6 | 7.5 | 6 | 63.6 | | Year 6 | 44.5 | 5.6 | 7.5 | 6 | 63.6 | | Total | 267.0 | 28.0 | 15.0 | 36 | 346.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Davide82
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x
Waz has predicted for a while on these boards that the two teams to come in in 2018-19 will be from Sydney and Brisbane, and it's looking like he is right.
There is no expansion in 2018-19. Gallop has ruled it out There may be a new 'Deloitte' business model in 2018-19 and depending how that goes they'll look at maybe 2 expansion afterwards at some point. Still got to find a replacement for Phoenix first I think he ruled out expansion for this coming season, so I am still expecting the inclusion of two new teams in 2018-19. Gallop says its first step will be to move to 12 teams – although it is yet to release A-League licence expansion criteria, a result of the governance negotiations dropping a spanner in the game’s cogs. After that, he says, a 14, even 16 team competition seems viable – “but that is long-term ambition,” he says, later clarifying that even a 12-team competition wouldn’t happen until after the new, still-in-negotiation operating model comes into effect for the 2018-19 season. https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/may/15/football-in-australia-as-big-as-its-going-to-get?CMP=share_btn_tw Read that carefully and it's ambiguous (intentionally so I would think). We all know the Fox agreement allows for the expansion of two clubs in 2018-19, although I agree with one of your posts above that Fox will control that process 100% and will only fork out the extra money if it's the two teams Fox wants - I have no problem believing that at all (and thus why the bidders are pitching to Fox, and also why we can completely ignore 80% of the bids we've heard about to date). You think FFA will introduce a new Business model plus maybe 3 new teams in one swoop ? I'll wager a slab of your shitty VB on that Ha - I don't drink! Look, anything is possible, but we both agree that Fox controls the show now, and we know what the Fox TV deal says - so if the right teams appear on the horizon (as far as Fox is concerned), then I think they would proceed with what the TV deal says, afterall, they are only paying $2.8 million extra per new team, so that's pretty good value for money from their perspective. That's implying that is the truth regarding the deal. Do you have a link? Waz has gone through it and thinks it's pretty close to the mark. Is this some sort of in joke you two have going on?
|
|
|
|
|
And Everyone Blamed Clive
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x
Waz has predicted for a while on these boards that the two teams to come in in 2018-19 will be from Sydney and Brisbane, and it's looking like he is right.
There is no expansion in 2018-19. Gallop has ruled it out There may be a new 'Deloitte' business model in 2018-19 and depending how that goes they'll look at maybe 2 expansion afterwards at some point. Still got to find a replacement for Phoenix first I think he ruled out expansion for this coming season, so I am still expecting the inclusion of two new teams in 2018-19. Gallop says its first step will be to move to 12 teams – although it is yet to release A-League licence expansion criteria, a result of the governance negotiations dropping a spanner in the game’s cogs. After that, he says, a 14, even 16 team competition seems viable – “but that is long-term ambition,” he says, later clarifying that even a 12-team competition wouldn’t happen until after the new, still-in-negotiation operating model comes into effect for the 2018-19 season. https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/may/15/football-in-australia-as-big-as-its-going-to-get?CMP=share_btn_tw Read that carefully and it's ambiguous (intentionally so I would think). We all know the Fox agreement allows for the expansion of two clubs in 2018-19, although I agree with one of your posts above that Fox will control that process 100% and will only fork out the extra money if it's the two teams Fox wants - I have no problem believing that at all (and thus why the bidders are pitching to Fox, and also why we can completely ignore 80% of the bids we've heard about to date). You think FFA will introduce a new Business model plus maybe 3 new teams in one swoop ? I'll wager a slab of your shitty VB on that Ha - I don't drink! Look, anything is possible, but we both agree that Fox controls the show now, and we know what the Fox TV deal says - so if the right teams appear on the horizon (as far as Fox is concerned), then I think they would proceed with what the TV deal says, afterall, they are only paying $2.8 million extra per new team, so that's pretty good value for money from their perspective. That's implying that is the truth regarding the deal. Do you have a link? Waz has gone through it and thinks it's pretty close to the mark. Is this some sort of in joke you two have going on? I'm not sure I want to know
Winner of Official 442 Comment of the day Award - 10th April 2017
|
|
|
|
pippinu
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x
Waz has predicted for a while on these boards that the two teams to come in in 2018-19 will be from Sydney and Brisbane, and it's looking like he is right.
There is no expansion in 2018-19. Gallop has ruled it out There may be a new 'Deloitte' business model in 2018-19 and depending how that goes they'll look at maybe 2 expansion afterwards at some point. Still got to find a replacement for Phoenix first I think he ruled out expansion for this coming season, so I am still expecting the inclusion of two new teams in 2018-19. Gallop says its first step will be to move to 12 teams – although it is yet to release A-League licence expansion criteria, a result of the governance negotiations dropping a spanner in the game’s cogs. After that, he says, a 14, even 16 team competition seems viable – “but that is long-term ambition,” he says, later clarifying that even a 12-team competition wouldn’t happen until after the new, still-in-negotiation operating model comes into effect for the 2018-19 season. https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/may/15/football-in-australia-as-big-as-its-going-to-get?CMP=share_btn_tw Read that carefully and it's ambiguous (intentionally so I would think). We all know the Fox agreement allows for the expansion of two clubs in 2018-19, although I agree with one of your posts above that Fox will control that process 100% and will only fork out the extra money if it's the two teams Fox wants - I have no problem believing that at all (and thus why the bidders are pitching to Fox, and also why we can completely ignore 80% of the bids we've heard about to date). You think FFA will introduce a new Business model plus maybe 3 new teams in one swoop ? I'll wager a slab of your shitty VB on that Ha - I don't drink! Look, anything is possible, but we both agree that Fox controls the show now, and we know what the Fox TV deal says - so if the right teams appear on the horizon (as far as Fox is concerned), then I think they would proceed with what the TV deal says, afterall, they are only paying $2.8 million extra per new team, so that's pretty good value for money from their perspective. That's implying that is the truth regarding the deal. Do you have a link? Waz has gone through it and thinks it's pretty close to the mark. Is this some sort of in joke you two have going on? I don't do jokes.
|
|
|
|
|
And Everyone Blamed Clive
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x
Waz has predicted for a while on these boards that the two teams to come in in 2018-19 will be from Sydney and Brisbane, and it's looking like he is right.
There is no expansion in 2018-19. Gallop has ruled it out There may be a new 'Deloitte' business model in 2018-19 and depending how that goes they'll look at maybe 2 expansion afterwards at some point. Still got to find a replacement for Phoenix first I think he ruled out expansion for this coming season, so I am still expecting the inclusion of two new teams in 2018-19. Gallop says its first step will be to move to 12 teams – although it is yet to release A-League licence expansion criteria, a result of the governance negotiations dropping a spanner in the game’s cogs. After that, he says, a 14, even 16 team competition seems viable – “but that is long-term ambition,” he says, later clarifying that even a 12-team competition wouldn’t happen until after the new, still-in-negotiation operating model comes into effect for the 2018-19 season. https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/may/15/football-in-australia-as-big-as-its-going-to-get?CMP=share_btn_tw Read that carefully and it's ambiguous (intentionally so I would think). We all know the Fox agreement allows for the expansion of two clubs in 2018-19, although I agree with one of your posts above that Fox will control that process 100% and will only fork out the extra money if it's the two teams Fox wants - I have no problem believing that at all (and thus why the bidders are pitching to Fox, and also why we can completely ignore 80% of the bids we've heard about to date). You think FFA will introduce a new Business model plus maybe 3 new teams in one swoop ? I'll wager a slab of your shitty VB on that Ha - I don't drink! Look, anything is possible, but we both agree that Fox controls the show now, and we know what the Fox TV deal says - so if the right teams appear on the horizon (as far as Fox is concerned), then I think they would proceed with what the TV deal says, afterall, they are only paying $2.8 million extra per new team, so that's pretty good value for money from their perspective. That's implying that is the truth regarding the deal. Do you have a link? Waz has gone through it and thinks it's pretty close to the mark. Is this some sort of in joke you two have going on? I don't do jokes. Holding up #WazFacts for validation of anything does suggest an acquaintance with the art of Irony
Winner of Official 442 Comment of the day Award - 10th April 2017
|
|
|
|
pippinu
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x
Waz has predicted for a while on these boards that the two teams to come in in 2018-19 will be from Sydney and Brisbane, and it's looking like he is right.
There is no expansion in 2018-19. Gallop has ruled it out There may be a new 'Deloitte' business model in 2018-19 and depending how that goes they'll look at maybe 2 expansion afterwards at some point. Still got to find a replacement for Phoenix first I think he ruled out expansion for this coming season, so I am still expecting the inclusion of two new teams in 2018-19. Gallop says its first step will be to move to 12 teams – although it is yet to release A-League licence expansion criteria, a result of the governance negotiations dropping a spanner in the game’s cogs. After that, he says, a 14, even 16 team competition seems viable – “but that is long-term ambition,” he says, later clarifying that even a 12-team competition wouldn’t happen until after the new, still-in-negotiation operating model comes into effect for the 2018-19 season. https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/may/15/football-in-australia-as-big-as-its-going-to-get?CMP=share_btn_tw Read that carefully and it's ambiguous (intentionally so I would think). We all know the Fox agreement allows for the expansion of two clubs in 2018-19, although I agree with one of your posts above that Fox will control that process 100% and will only fork out the extra money if it's the two teams Fox wants - I have no problem believing that at all (and thus why the bidders are pitching to Fox, and also why we can completely ignore 80% of the bids we've heard about to date). You think FFA will introduce a new Business model plus maybe 3 new teams in one swoop ? I'll wager a slab of your shitty VB on that Ha - I don't drink! Look, anything is possible, but we both agree that Fox controls the show now, and we know what the Fox TV deal says - so if the right teams appear on the horizon (as far as Fox is concerned), then I think they would proceed with what the TV deal says, afterall, they are only paying $2.8 million extra per new team, so that's pretty good value for money from their perspective. That's implying that is the truth regarding the deal. Do you have a link? Waz has gone through it and thinks it's pretty close to the mark. Is this some sort of in joke you two have going on? I don't do jokes. Holding up #WazFacts for validation of anything does suggest an acquaintance with the art of Irony Waz is all right isn't he?
|
|
|
|
|
And Everyone Blamed Clive
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x
Waz has predicted for a while on these boards that the two teams to come in in 2018-19 will be from Sydney and Brisbane, and it's looking like he is right.
There is no expansion in 2018-19. Gallop has ruled it out There may be a new 'Deloitte' business model in 2018-19 and depending how that goes they'll look at maybe 2 expansion afterwards at some point. Still got to find a replacement for Phoenix first I think he ruled out expansion for this coming season, so I am still expecting the inclusion of two new teams in 2018-19. Gallop says its first step will be to move to 12 teams – although it is yet to release A-League licence expansion criteria, a result of the governance negotiations dropping a spanner in the game’s cogs. After that, he says, a 14, even 16 team competition seems viable – “but that is long-term ambition,” he says, later clarifying that even a 12-team competition wouldn’t happen until after the new, still-in-negotiation operating model comes into effect for the 2018-19 season. https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/may/15/football-in-australia-as-big-as-its-going-to-get?CMP=share_btn_tw Read that carefully and it's ambiguous (intentionally so I would think). We all know the Fox agreement allows for the expansion of two clubs in 2018-19, although I agree with one of your posts above that Fox will control that process 100% and will only fork out the extra money if it's the two teams Fox wants - I have no problem believing that at all (and thus why the bidders are pitching to Fox, and also why we can completely ignore 80% of the bids we've heard about to date). You think FFA will introduce a new Business model plus maybe 3 new teams in one swoop ? I'll wager a slab of your shitty VB on that Ha - I don't drink! Look, anything is possible, but we both agree that Fox controls the show now, and we know what the Fox TV deal says - so if the right teams appear on the horizon (as far as Fox is concerned), then I think they would proceed with what the TV deal says, afterall, they are only paying $2.8 million extra per new team, so that's pretty good value for money from their perspective. That's implying that is the truth regarding the deal. Do you have a link? Waz has gone through it and thinks it's pretty close to the mark. Is this some sort of in joke you two have going on? I don't do jokes. Holding up #WazFacts for validation of anything does suggest an acquaintance with the art of Irony Waz is all right isn't he? He's allright for a Roar fan Sourcing his statements not his strong suit though
Winner of Official 442 Comment of the day Award - 10th April 2017
|
|
|
|
|
clivesundies
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x
Waz has predicted for a while on these boards that the two teams to come in in 2018-19 will be from Sydney and Brisbane, and it's looking like he is right.
There is no expansion in 2018-19. Gallop has ruled it out There may be a new 'Deloitte' business model in 2018-19 and depending how that goes they'll look at maybe 2 expansion afterwards at some point. Still got to find a replacement for Phoenix first I think he ruled out expansion for this coming season, so I am still expecting the inclusion of two new teams in 2018-19. Gallop says its first step will be to move to 12 teams – although it is yet to release A-League licence expansion criteria, a result of the governance negotiations dropping a spanner in the game’s cogs. After that, he says, a 14, even 16 team competition seems viable – “but that is long-term ambition,” he says, later clarifying that even a 12-team competition wouldn’t happen until after the new, still-in-negotiation operating model comes into effect for the 2018-19 season. https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/may/15/football-in-australia-as-big-as-its-going-to-get?CMP=share_btn_tw Read that carefully and it's ambiguous (intentionally so I would think). We all know the Fox agreement allows for the expansion of two clubs in 2018-19, although I agree with one of your posts above that Fox will control that process 100% and will only fork out the extra money if it's the two teams Fox wants - I have no problem believing that at all (and thus why the bidders are pitching to Fox, and also why we can completely ignore 80% of the bids we've heard about to date). You think FFA will introduce a new Business model plus maybe 3 new teams in one swoop ? I'll wager a slab of your shitty VB on that Ha - I don't drink! Look, anything is possible, but we both agree that Fox controls the show now, and we know what the Fox TV deal says - so if the right teams appear on the horizon (as far as Fox is concerned), then I think they would proceed with what the TV deal says, afterall, they are only paying $2.8 million extra per new team, so that's pretty good value for money from their perspective. That's implying that is the truth regarding the deal. Do you have a link? Waz has gone through it and thinks it's pretty close to the mark. Is this some sort of in joke you two have going on? I don't do jokes. Holding up #WazFacts for validation of anything does suggest an acquaintance with the art of Irony Waz is all right isn't he? He's allright for a Roar fan Sourcing his statements not his strong suit though Is pipi giving waz some head?
|
|
|
|
pippinu
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Inside Sport must be so proud of its mods and the quality of discussion on these boards.
|
|
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
+xInside Sport must be so proud of its mods and the quality of discussion on these boards. You opt to come on the forum and make comments that you know will annoy those who post here. We allow you to do so because it's a free country. I fail to understand why you would get upset with the responses, or feel that they are inappropriate. If you don't like it, move on.
|
|
|
|
pippinu
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xInside Sport must be so proud of its mods and the quality of discussion on these boards. You opt to come on the forum and make comments that you know will annoy those who post here. We allow you to do so because it's a free country. I fail to understand why you would get upset with the responses, or feel that they are inappropriate. If you don't like it, move on. I certainly do not diminish myself via the use of foul language which would not be acceptable to any half decent media outlet, especially one likely to attract young audences. You have been on this board for as long as I Benjamin, and let us not forget that you, in the past, have been accused of all sorts of things for holding a particular viewpoint. Your response then, as always, was reasonable and appropriate: I call it the way I see it.
|
|
|
|
|
clivesundies
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xInside Sport must be so proud of its mods and the quality of discussion on these boards. You opt to come on the forum and make comments that you know will annoy those who post here. We allow you to do so because it's a free country. I fail to understand why you would get upset with the responses, or feel that they are inappropriate. If you don't like it, move on. I certainly do not diminish myself via the use of foul language which would not be acceptable to any half decent media outlet, especially one likely to attract young audences. You have been on this board for as long as I Benjamin, and let us not forget that you, in the past, have been accused of all sorts of things for holding a particular viewpoint. Your response then, as always, was reasonable and appropriate: I call it the way I see it. To diminish yourself any further would be an absolute impossibility you are already the saddest of the sad.
|
|
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xInside Sport must be so proud of its mods and the quality of discussion on these boards. You opt to come on the forum and make comments that you know will annoy those who post here. We allow you to do so because it's a free country. I fail to understand why you would get upset with the responses, or feel that they are inappropriate. If you don't like it, move on. I certainly do not diminish myself via the use of foul language which would not be acceptable to any half decent media outlet, especially one likely to attract young audences. You have been on this board for as long as I Benjamin, and let us not forget that you, in the past, have been accused of all sorts of things for holding a particular viewpoint. Your response then, as always, was reasonable and appropriate: I call it the way I see it. Difference being that I never complained about the conduct of those who disagreed with me - I simply debated them - and at the end of the day, whilst they may have disagreed with me on the specifics, we all knew that we wanted the game as a whole to grow. None of us were talking up another code.
|
|
|
|
|
robbos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xInside Sport must be so proud of its mods and the quality of discussion on these boards. You opt to come on the forum and make comments that you know will annoy those who post here. We allow you to do so because it's a free country. I fail to understand why you would get upset with the responses, or feel that they are inappropriate. If you don't like it, move on. I certainly do not diminish myself via the use of foul language which would not be acceptable to any half decent media outlet, especially one likely to attract young audences. You have been on this board for as long as I Benjamin, and let us not forget that you, in the past, have been accused of all sorts of things for holding a particular viewpoint. Your response then, as always, was reasonable and appropriate: I call it the way I see it. It is not your particular viewpoint we disagree on, the issue that confuses us is what is your viewpoint, do you even have a viewpoint except to disrupt? The Sky is blue, no it's not, it's a clear day & hence the sky is blue, no it's not. BTW it's audiences not audences!!!
|
|
|
|
pippinu
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xInside Sport must be so proud of its mods and the quality of discussion on these boards. You opt to come on the forum and make comments that you know will annoy those who post here. We allow you to do so because it's a free country. I fail to understand why you would get upset with the responses, or feel that they are inappropriate. If you don't like it, move on. I certainly do not diminish myself via the use of foul language which would not be acceptable to any half decent media outlet, especially one likely to attract young audences. You have been on this board for as long as I Benjamin, and let us not forget that you, in the past, have been accused of all sorts of things for holding a particular viewpoint. Your response then, as always, was reasonable and appropriate: I call it the way I see it. Difference being that I never complained about the conduct of those who disagreed with me - I simply debated them - and at the end of the day, whilst they may have disagreed with me on the specifics, we all knew that we wanted the game as a whole to grow. None of us were talking up another code. Well, I'm certainly disappointed to hear that you condone the use of foul language in such a forum.
|
|
|
|
|
robbos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xInside Sport must be so proud of its mods and the quality of discussion on these boards. You opt to come on the forum and make comments that you know will annoy those who post here. We allow you to do so because it's a free country. I fail to understand why you would get upset with the responses, or feel that they are inappropriate. If you don't like it, move on. I certainly do not diminish myself via the use of foul language which would not be acceptable to any half decent media outlet, especially one likely to attract young audences. You have been on this board for as long as I Benjamin, and let us not forget that you, in the past, have been accused of all sorts of things for holding a particular viewpoint. Your response then, as always, was reasonable and appropriate: I call it the way I see it. Difference being that I never complained about the conduct of those who disagreed with me - I simply debated them - and at the end of the day, whilst they may have disagreed with me on the specifics, we all knew that we wanted the game as a whole to grow. None of us were talking up another code. Well, I'm certainly disappointed to hear that you condone the use of foul language in such a forum. Certainly not someone who has ever had children or aware of today's pop culture (whether you like it or not).
|
|
|
|
|
Coverdale
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Pip you don't drink? Let me guess, you also bring a cushion and am radio to the gayfl and eat prawn sangers. It's all making sense now
|
|
|
|
|
And Everyone Blamed Clive
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xInside Sport must be so proud of its mods and the quality of discussion on these boards. You opt to come on the forum and make comments that you know will annoy those who post here. We allow you to do so because it's a free country. I fail to understand why you would get upset with the responses, or feel that they are inappropriate. If you don't like it, move on. I certainly do not diminish myself via the use of foul language which would not be acceptable to any half decent media outlet, especially one likely to attract young audences. You have been on this board for as long as I Benjamin, and let us not forget that you, in the past, have been accused of all sorts of things for holding a particular viewpoint. Your response then, as always, was reasonable and appropriate: I call it the way I see it. Difference being that I never complained about the conduct of those who disagreed with me - I simply debated them - and at the end of the day, whilst they may have disagreed with me on the specifics, we all knew that we wanted the game as a whole to grow. None of us were talking up another code. Well, I'm certainly disappointed to hear that you condone the use of foul language in such a forum. No-ones going to get reprimanded for potty-mouth because you claim to have a problem with it
Winner of Official 442 Comment of the day Award - 10th April 2017
|
|
|
|
|
primtech
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 172,
Visits: 0
|
Pip has only one item on the agenda. Promote Eggball. No other explanation for the endless comparisons to that code. Like if he mentions it enough times in completely unrelated topics people will actually say screw it, lets drop everything and jump onboard. Its one of the oldest propaganda tricks in the book. Disrupt, Disrupt, Disrupt!
|
|
|
|
pippinu
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xInside Sport must be so proud of its mods and the quality of discussion on these boards. You opt to come on the forum and make comments that you know will annoy those who post here. We allow you to do so because it's a free country. I fail to understand why you would get upset with the responses, or feel that they are inappropriate. If you don't like it, move on. I certainly do not diminish myself via the use of foul language which would not be acceptable to any half decent media outlet, especially one likely to attract young audences. You have been on this board for as long as I Benjamin, and let us not forget that you, in the past, have been accused of all sorts of things for holding a particular viewpoint. Your response then, as always, was reasonable and appropriate: I call it the way I see it. Difference being that I never complained about the conduct of those who disagreed with me - I simply debated them - and at the end of the day, whilst they may have disagreed with me on the specifics, we all knew that we wanted the game as a whole to grow. None of us were talking up another code. Well, I'm certainly disappointed to hear that you condone the use of foul language in such a forum. Certainly not someone who has ever had children or aware of today's pop culture (whether you like it or not). I would have thought that Inside Sport would have some standards.
|
|
|
|
|
maxxie
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xInside Sport must be so proud of its mods and the quality of discussion on these boards. You opt to come on the forum and make comments that you know will annoy those who post here. We allow you to do so because it's a free country. I fail to understand why you would get upset with the responses, or feel that they are inappropriate. If you don't like it, move on. I certainly do not diminish myself via the use of foul language which would not be acceptable to any half decent media outlet, especially one likely to attract young audences. You have been on this board for as long as I Benjamin, and let us not forget that you, in the past, have been accused of all sorts of things for holding a particular viewpoint. Your response then, as always, was reasonable and appropriate: I call it the way I see it. Difference being that I never complained about the conduct of those who disagreed with me - I simply debated them - and at the end of the day, whilst they may have disagreed with me on the specifics, we all knew that we wanted the game as a whole to grow. None of us were talking up another code. Well, I'm certainly disappointed to hear that you condone the use of foul language in such a forum. This has to be a fucking troll, right?
|
|
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xInside Sport must be so proud of its mods and the quality of discussion on these boards. You opt to come on the forum and make comments that you know will annoy those who post here. We allow you to do so because it's a free country. I fail to understand why you would get upset with the responses, or feel that they are inappropriate. If you don't like it, move on. I certainly do not diminish myself via the use of foul language which would not be acceptable to any half decent media outlet, especially one likely to attract young audences. You have been on this board for as long as I Benjamin, and let us not forget that you, in the past, have been accused of all sorts of things for holding a particular viewpoint. Your response then, as always, was reasonable and appropriate: I call it the way I see it. Difference being that I never complained about the conduct of those who disagreed with me - I simply debated them - and at the end of the day, whilst they may have disagreed with me on the specifics, we all knew that we wanted the game as a whole to grow. None of us were talking up another code. Well, I'm certainly disappointed to hear that you condone the use of foul language in such a forum. Certainly not someone who has ever had children or aware of today's pop culture (whether you like it or not). I would have thought that Inside Sport would have some standards. Well, we keep letting you post...
|
|
|
|
|
clivesundies
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xInside Sport must be so proud of its mods and the quality of discussion on these boards. You opt to come on the forum and make comments that you know will annoy those who post here. We allow you to do so because it's a free country. I fail to understand why you would get upset with the responses, or feel that they are inappropriate. If you don't like it, move on. I certainly do not diminish myself via the use of foul language which would not be acceptable to any half decent media outlet, especially one likely to attract young audences. You have been on this board for as long as I Benjamin, and let us not forget that you, in the past, have been accused of all sorts of things for holding a particular viewpoint. Your response then, as always, was reasonable and appropriate: I call it the way I see it. Difference being that I never complained about the conduct of those who disagreed with me - I simply debated them - and at the end of the day, whilst they may have disagreed with me on the specifics, we all knew that we wanted the game as a whole to grow. None of us were talking up another code. Well, I'm certainly disappointed to hear that you condone the use of foul language in such a forum. Certainly not someone who has ever had children or aware of today's pop culture (whether you like it or not). I would have thought that Inside Sport would have some standards. Well, we keep letting you post... Owned.
|
|
|
|
pippinu
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xInside Sport must be so proud of its mods and the quality of discussion on these boards. You opt to come on the forum and make comments that you know will annoy those who post here. We allow you to do so because it's a free country. I fail to understand why you would get upset with the responses, or feel that they are inappropriate. If you don't like it, move on. I certainly do not diminish myself via the use of foul language which would not be acceptable to any half decent media outlet, especially one likely to attract young audences. You have been on this board for as long as I Benjamin, and let us not forget that you, in the past, have been accused of all sorts of things for holding a particular viewpoint. Your response then, as always, was reasonable and appropriate: I call it the way I see it. Difference being that I never complained about the conduct of those who disagreed with me - I simply debated them - and at the end of the day, whilst they may have disagreed with me on the specifics, we all knew that we wanted the game as a whole to grow. None of us were talking up another code. Well, I'm certainly disappointed to hear that you condone the use of foul language in such a forum. Certainly not someone who has ever had children or aware of today's pop culture (whether you like it or not). I would have thought that Inside Sport would have some standards. Well, we keep letting you post... "We"? Are you an employee of Inside Sport?
|
|
|
|
pippinu
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xInside Sport must be so proud of its mods and the quality of discussion on these boards. You opt to come on the forum and make comments that you know will annoy those who post here. We allow you to do so because it's a free country. I fail to understand why you would get upset with the responses, or feel that they are inappropriate. If you don't like it, move on. I certainly do not diminish myself via the use of foul language which would not be acceptable to any half decent media outlet, especially one likely to attract young audences. You have been on this board for as long as I Benjamin, and let us not forget that you, in the past, have been accused of all sorts of things for holding a particular viewpoint. Your response then, as always, was reasonable and appropriate: I call it the way I see it. Difference being that I never complained about the conduct of those who disagreed with me - I simply debated them - and at the end of the day, whilst they may have disagreed with me on the specifics, we all knew that we wanted the game as a whole to grow. None of us were talking up another code. Well, I'm certainly disappointed to hear that you condone the use of foul language in such a forum. Certainly not someone who has ever had children or aware of today's pop culture (whether you like it or not). I would have thought that Inside Sport would have some standards. Well, we keep letting you post... Owned. It's precisely this sort of wit which makes Inside Sport the great site that it is.
|
|
|
|
|
And Everyone Blamed Clive
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xInside Sport must be so proud of its mods and the quality of discussion on these boards. You opt to come on the forum and make comments that you know will annoy those who post here. We allow you to do so because it's a free country. I fail to understand why you would get upset with the responses, or feel that they are inappropriate. If you don't like it, move on. I certainly do not diminish myself via the use of foul language which would not be acceptable to any half decent media outlet, especially one likely to attract young audences. You have been on this board for as long as I Benjamin, and let us not forget that you, in the past, have been accused of all sorts of things for holding a particular viewpoint. Your response then, as always, was reasonable and appropriate: I call it the way I see it. Difference being that I never complained about the conduct of those who disagreed with me - I simply debated them - and at the end of the day, whilst they may have disagreed with me on the specifics, we all knew that we wanted the game as a whole to grow. None of us were talking up another code. Well, I'm certainly disappointed to hear that you condone the use of foul language in such a forum. Certainly not someone who has ever had children or aware of today's pop culture (whether you like it or not). I would have thought that Inside Sport would have some standards. Well, we keep letting you post... 
Winner of Official 442 Comment of the day Award - 10th April 2017
|
|
|
|