|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x@ sack That would seem to be the vision. Ditching the Azuri blue is probably designed to avoid upsetting SFC but I'd rather they kept that identity. if more and more clubs were allowed to keep their traditional colours, then the FFA cant use the excuse for keeping out teams like south melboune, sydney united and others BCFC have chosen to change their colours under the FCBC name.  Whether FFA informed them to is somewhat unknown. But I can understand why they chose to change the sky blue. Not so much for SFCs sake but perhaps that a greater Brisbane and Qld audience would reject it on mass. I hate dif but they could use a similar combination as difs away kit this season   Use white trim or change to gold like Port Melbourne  i just looked at the broncos 2001 kit and the maroon, blue and yellow colours go very well together 
hope they go with maroon with navy blue sash with the yellow border over the sash. make it an adidas kit too  ? it could work. may not be everyones tastes though Im not a massive fan of having a sash. I also dont believe that you need to have every colour that is on your emblem on your shirt. I mentioned earlier I think the mexican green white and red socks could work, as Marconi have used. Other wise blue and white like Blackburn or QPR  could use maroon instead of red  likewise. I think Roar would change back to Orange, black and white and drop the blue if this happened.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HeyItsRobbie
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x@ sack That would seem to be the vision. Ditching the Azuri blue is probably designed to avoid upsetting SFC but I'd rather they kept that identity. if more and more clubs were allowed to keep their traditional colours, then the FFA cant use the excuse for keeping out teams like south melboune, sydney united and others BCFC have chosen to change their colours under the FCBC name. Whether FFA informed them to is somewhat unknown. But I can understand why they chose to change the sky blue. Not so much for SFCs sake but perhaps that a greater Brisbane and Qld audience would reject it on mass. I hate dif but they could use a similar combination as difs away kit this season Use white trim or change to gold like Port Melbourne i just looked at the broncos 2001 kit and the maroon, blue and yellow colours go very well together
hope they go with maroon with navy blue sash with the yellow border over the sash. make it an adidas kit too ? it could work. may not be everyones tastes though Im not a massive fan of having a sash. I also dont believe that you need to have every colour that is on your emblem on your shirt. I mentioned earlier I think the mexican green white and red socks could work, as Marconi have used. Other wise blue and white like Blackburn or QPR could use maroon instead of red likewise. I think Roar would change back to Orange, black and white and drop the blue if this happened. kinda gives me an idea. we'll take the blackburn rovers template. replace the blue with light grey and replace the red with maroon. maroon shorts and white socks with a maroon stripe. would be an alright away jersey though
|
|
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x@ sack That would seem to be the vision. Ditching the Azuri blue is probably designed to avoid upsetting SFC but I'd rather they kept that identity. if more and more clubs were allowed to keep their traditional colours, then the FFA cant use the excuse for keeping out teams like south melboune, sydney united and others BCFC have chosen to change their colours under the FCBC name. Whether FFA informed them to is somewhat unknown. But I can understand why they chose to change the sky blue. Not so much for SFCs sake but perhaps that a greater Brisbane and Qld audience would reject it on mass. I hate dif but they could use a similar combination as difs away kit this season Use white trim or change to gold like Port Melbourne i just looked at the broncos 2001 kit and the maroon, blue and yellow colours go very well together
hope they go with maroon with navy blue sash with the yellow border over the sash. make it an adidas kit too ? it could work. may not be everyones tastes though Im not a massive fan of having a sash. I also dont believe that you need to have every colour that is on your emblem on your shirt. I mentioned earlier I think the mexican green white and red socks could work, as Marconi have used. Other wise blue and white like Blackburn or QPR could use maroon instead of red likewise. I think Roar would change back to Orange, black and white and drop the blue if this happened. kinda gives me an idea. we'll take the blackburn rovers template. replace the blue with light grey and replace the red with maroon. maroon shorts and white socks with a maroon stripe. would be an alright away jersey though Not exactly as you said but you can see the colour combination together. 
|
|
|
|
|
HeyItsRobbie
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x@ sack That would seem to be the vision. Ditching the Azuri blue is probably designed to avoid upsetting SFC but I'd rather they kept that identity. if more and more clubs were allowed to keep their traditional colours, then the FFA cant use the excuse for keeping out teams like south melboune, sydney united and others BCFC have chosen to change their colours under the FCBC name. Whether FFA informed them to is somewhat unknown. But I can understand why they chose to change the sky blue. Not so much for SFCs sake but perhaps that a greater Brisbane and Qld audience would reject it on mass. I hate dif but they could use a similar combination as difs away kit this season Use white trim or change to gold like Port Melbourne i just looked at the broncos 2001 kit and the maroon, blue and yellow colours go very well together
hope they go with maroon with navy blue sash with the yellow border over the sash. make it an adidas kit too ? it could work. may not be everyones tastes though Im not a massive fan of having a sash. I also dont believe that you need to have every colour that is on your emblem on your shirt. I mentioned earlier I think the mexican green white and red socks could work, as Marconi have used. Other wise blue and white like Blackburn or QPR could use maroon instead of red likewise. I think Roar would change back to Orange, black and white and drop the blue if this happened. kinda gives me an idea. we'll take the blackburn rovers template. replace the blue with light grey and replace the red with maroon. maroon shorts and white socks with a maroon stripe. would be an alright away jersey though Not exactly as you said but you can see the colour combination together. didnt turn out as good as i hoped.
|
|
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x@ sack That would seem to be the vision. Ditching the Azuri blue is probably designed to avoid upsetting SFC but I'd rather they kept that identity. if more and more clubs were allowed to keep their traditional colours, then the FFA cant use the excuse for keeping out teams like south melboune, sydney united and others BCFC have chosen to change their colours under the FCBC name. Whether FFA informed them to is somewhat unknown. But I can understand why they chose to change the sky blue. Not so much for SFCs sake but perhaps that a greater Brisbane and Qld audience would reject it on mass. I hate dif but they could use a similar combination as difs away kit this season Use white trim or change to gold like Port Melbourne i just looked at the broncos 2001 kit and the maroon, blue and yellow colours go very well together
hope they go with maroon with navy blue sash with the yellow border over the sash. make it an adidas kit too ? it could work. may not be everyones tastes though Im not a massive fan of having a sash. I also dont believe that you need to have every colour that is on your emblem on your shirt. I mentioned earlier I think the mexican green white and red socks could work, as Marconi have used. Other wise blue and white like Blackburn or QPR could use maroon instead of red likewise. I think Roar would change back to Orange, black and white and drop the blue if this happened. kinda gives me an idea. we'll take the blackburn rovers template. replace the blue with light grey and replace the red with maroon. maroon shorts and white socks with a maroon stripe. would be an alright away jersey though Not exactly as you said but you can see the colour combination together. didnt turn out as good as i hoped. There really is no limit if you are creating a teams colours or changing. You could even say they could retain the sky blue  and incorpote the same blue as their new emblem (for the city) Again dif comes up. This is their home shirt this season, although they are wearing dark shorts. That would be a clash imo with SFC   But you could just use white shorts. 
|
|
|
|
|
Torak
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 703,
Visits: 0
|
United Kit released on Club store Pretty happy with the attempt. Won't be getting a home kit myself as I got the authentic one last year. http://www.aufcstore.com.au/
|
|
|
|
|
Davide82
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
+xUnited Kit released on Club store Pretty happy with the attempt. Won't be getting a home kit myself as I got the authentic one last year. http://www.aufcstore.com.au/ Not bad at all!!
|
|
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
pv4
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
Woof, absolutely love that Adelaide kit!
|
|
|
|
|
Terre Astrale
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 168,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x@ sack That would seem to be the vision. Ditching the Azuri blue is probably designed to avoid upsetting SFC but I'd rather they kept that identity. if more and more clubs were allowed to keep their traditional colours, then the FFA cant use the excuse for keeping out teams like south melboune, sydney united and others BCFC have chosen to change their colours under the FCBC name. Whether FFA informed them to is somewhat unknown. But I can understand why they chose to change the sky blue. Not so much for SFCs sake but perhaps that a greater Brisbane and Qld audience would reject it on mass. I hate dif but they could use a similar combination as difs away kit this season Use white trim or change to gold like Port Melbourne i just looked at the broncos 2001 kit and the maroon, blue and yellow colours go very well together
hope they go with maroon with navy blue sash with the yellow border over the sash. make it an adidas kit too ? it could work. may not be everyones tastes though Im not a massive fan of having a sash. I also dont believe that you need to have every colour that is on your emblem on your shirt. I mentioned earlier I think the mexican green white and red socks could work, as Marconi have used. Other wise blue and white like Blackburn or QPR could use maroon instead of red likewise. I think Roar would change back to Orange, black and white and drop the blue if this happened. kinda gives me an idea. we'll take the blackburn rovers template. replace the blue with light grey and replace the red with maroon. maroon shorts and white socks with a maroon stripe. would be an alright away jersey though Not exactly as you said but you can see the colour combination together. didnt turn out as good as i hoped. There really is no limit if you are creating a teams colours or changing. You could even say they could retain the sky blue and incorpote the same blue as their new emblem (for the city) Again dif comes up. This is their home shirt this season, although they are wearing dark shorts. That would be a clash imo with SFC But you could just use white shorts. Wouldnt mind these for Sydney FC
|
|
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
Didnt mind the WP white and black kit. Nice that it was clean. 
|
|
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
pv4
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
MarkfromCroydon
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Those Melbourne Knights kits are top shelf. Pretty much everything right in the design.
|
|
|
|
|
RedshirtWilly
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.4K,
Visits: 0
|
More like Melbourne Croatia mirite?
Seriously, it does look nice and Balkan, even though they look awesome
|
|
|
|
|
azzaMVFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K,
Visits: 0
|
NPL kits always look better than HAL kits. Probably because the fucking NPL badge is on the sleeve.
|
|
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x@ sack That would seem to be the vision. Ditching the Azuri blue is probably designed to avoid upsetting SFC but I'd rather they kept that identity. if more and more clubs were allowed to keep their traditional colours, then the FFA cant use the excuse for keeping out teams like south melboune, sydney united and others BCFC have chosen to change their colours under the FCBC name. Whether FFA informed them to is somewhat unknown. But I can understand why they chose to change the sky blue. Not so much for SFCs sake but perhaps that a greater Brisbane and Qld audience would reject it on mass. I hate dif but they could use a similar combination as difs away kit this season Use white trim or change to gold like Port Melbourne i just looked at the broncos 2001 kit and the maroon, blue and yellow colours go very well together
hope they go with maroon with navy blue sash with the yellow border over the sash. make it an adidas kit too ? it could work. may not be everyones tastes though Saw this kit online. Think it looks nice (wine red). Would fit a Brisbane club howeverI think most clubs could have it as an away kit, especially AU.  
|
|
|
|
|
HeyItsRobbie
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x@ sack That would seem to be the vision. Ditching the Azuri blue is probably designed to avoid upsetting SFC but I'd rather they kept that identity. if more and more clubs were allowed to keep their traditional colours, then the FFA cant use the excuse for keeping out teams like south melboune, sydney united and others BCFC have chosen to change their colours under the FCBC name. Whether FFA informed them to is somewhat unknown. But I can understand why they chose to change the sky blue. Not so much for SFCs sake but perhaps that a greater Brisbane and Qld audience would reject it on mass. I hate dif but they could use a similar combination as difs away kit this season Use white trim or change to gold like Port Melbourne i just looked at the broncos 2001 kit and the maroon, blue and yellow colours go very well together
hope they go with maroon with navy blue sash with the yellow border over the sash. make it an adidas kit too ? it could work. may not be everyones tastes though Saw this kit online. Think it looks nice (wine red). Would fit a Brisbane club howeverI think most clubs could have it as an away kit, especially AU. i reckon it needs blue shorts
|
|
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
marconi101
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16K,
Visits: 0
|
More absurd AFC regulations
He was a man of specific quirks. He believed that all meals should be earned through physical effort. He also contended, zealously like a drunk with a political point, that the third dimension would not be possible if it werent for the existence of water.
|
|
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+xMore absurd AFC regulations It seems odd to me that SFC would go with white. If navy and sky blue are too close then playing in a black kit or even dark orange would seem more logical to me. Even dark grey/silver. They have stated they want to be the biggest club in Asia and they arent even playing in their normal colours? becuase of the away kit :crazy:
Just a way to sell more white kits or perhaps they were scared more people would prefer these to their A-League kit and it would piss off their A-League sponsor. Either way nuts.
|
|
|
|
|
No Totti No Party
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 490,
Visits: 0
|
+xNPL kits always look better than HAL kits. Probably because the fucking NPL badge is on the sleeve. Nope, the NPL badge is worn on the chest as well
|
|
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xMore absurd AFC regulations It seems odd to me that SFC would go with white. If navy and sky blue are too close then playing in a black kit or even dark orange would seem more logical to me. Even dark grey/silver. They have stated they want to be the biggest club in Asia and they arent even playing in their normal colours? becuase of the away kit :crazy:
Just a way to sell more white kits or perhaps they were scared more people would prefer these to their A-League kit and it would piss off their A-League sponsor. Either way nuts. The pic doesn't show it but the shirt fades into sky blue about half way down. It actually looks great imo.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
|
jlm8695
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
I rate that home kit tbh
|
|
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
 It's still a bit meh for me but that is just my taste. Here is a potential alternative for SFC in some capacity. 
|
|
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
Watching Celta Vigo away game, I think MC could incorporate some red into home kit. It would nothing like Man U. It is subtle but gives effect.  
|
|
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
BA81
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.9K,
Visits: 0
|
LOL at them holding a HAL-era GCU ball...just readopt the old logo already you schleppers
|
|
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
|