+x@gyfoxThen PFA should be able to just send a women. APFCA as stated are trying to follow FIFAs initial suggestion.The women's thing popped up after Lowy couldn't get his vote through.FFA wanted 9 3 1. The PFA can send a woman if they get included on the Review Committee if they like but they have a narrow role as a stakeholder. They don't speak for the women's game. The "women's thing" came up well before this all started firing up here. FIFA's principles that I referred to were promulgated in 2014 and developed out of a quadrennial FIFA women's symposium that commenced in 1995. Its not new at all, its just that FIFA has been giving it more emphasis recently and requiring more action from the MA's. As far as the current dispute about congress numbers it was the PFA that brought in a women's rep when they wanted a rep for each gender and in discussions they were prepared to allow the rep for the women's game to be separate. The congress numbers the FFA and the APFCA argued for were nonsense. Neither satisfy FIFA's principle of representative democracy. Each was arguing for a split that advanced them.
|