APFCA makes submission to FIFA/AFC delegation


APFCA makes submission to FIFA/AFC delegation

Author
Message
Gyfox
Gyfox
Legend
Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)Legend (13K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K, Visits: 0
scott21 - 22 Feb 2018 9:10 AM
@gyfoxThen PFA should be able to just send a women. APFCA as stated are trying to follow FIFAs initial suggestion.The women's thing popped up after Lowy couldn't get his vote through.FFA wanted 9 3 1.

The PFA can send a woman if they get included on the Review Committee if they like but they have a narrow role as a stakeholder.  They don't speak for the women's game.

The "women's thing" came up well before this all started firing up here.  FIFA's principles that I referred to were promulgated in 2014 and developed out of a quadrennial FIFA women's symposium that commenced in 1995.  Its not new at all, its just that FIFA has been giving it more emphasis recently and requiring more action from the MA's.  As far as the current dispute about congress numbers it was the PFA that brought in a women's rep when they wanted a rep for each gender and in discussions they were prepared to allow the rep for the women's game to be separate.

The congress numbers the FFA and the APFCA argued for were nonsense.  Neither satisfy FIFA's principle of representative democracy.  Each was arguing for a split that advanced them.
Edited
6 Years Ago by Gyfox
RBBAnonymous
RBBAnonymous
Pro
Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K, Visits: 0
bigpoppa - 22 Feb 2018 9:57 AM
I am extremely curious as to why AAFC are being shown the same equality as all the current stakeholders. AAFC must be doing something right you would think.

Its no so much they are doing something right, even though they probably are. They are just representing a large group of stakeholders and those stakeholders I believe would be happy with the job they are doing. As soon as they aren't they would be voted out or not longer represent those stakeholders. A concept that is totally lost on the FFA. 







Edited
6 Years Ago by RBBAnonymous
Waz
Waz
Legend
Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K, Visits: 0
@ bigpoppa

“I am extremely curious as to why AAFC are being shown the same equality as all the current stakeholders” .... it’s not who they are but who they represent that’s doing it - they represent players and clubs.

The new order that’s being born out of all this that the FFA don’t like is:

- AAPFC and PFA to represent the professional game
- AAFC and an as yet to be constituted players group to represent the semi-professional game
- State Federations to represent grassroots football

Add in a few SIGS and that is your new Congress.

An FFA Administration body can then be appointed including elected board and hired administrators to do what they want. That’s called the FFA.
Coverdale
Coverdale
Pro
Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)Pro (2.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.2K, Visits: 0
At least this is more interesting than the A-League
maxxie
maxxie
Pro
Pro (3.7K reputation)Pro (3.7K reputation)Pro (3.7K reputation)Pro (3.7K reputation)Pro (3.7K reputation)Pro (3.7K reputation)Pro (3.7K reputation)Pro (3.7K reputation)Pro (3.7K reputation)Pro (3.7K reputation)Pro (3.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K, Visits: 0
bigpoppa - 22 Feb 2018 9:53 AM
It's fantasy thinking but just imagine if FIFA/AFC is thinking about giving AAFC proposed competition D1 status and independence from FFA and the A-League clubs the option to join it if they want to break from FFA.

You'd have to rip the clubs IP from the FFAs cold dead hands.
aussie scott21
aussie scott21
Legend
Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K, Visits: 0
Havent seen any mention of the womens group yet 



"It's understood state member federations, A-League clubs, the PFA and representatives of @AAFClubs agreed that FIFA should put in place an independent chairman of the Congress Review Working Group, ensuring that role be held by someone with no affiliation to the FFA."

FFA chairman Steven Lowy further isolated from stakeholders after FIFA visit
GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search