bluebird2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 648,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xYou only need to have a look at Queensland to see whats wrong with Australia's management of the pandemic They introduced a traffic light system of meaningless B grade restrictions. Today they have announced they have already moved into the green despite national consistency being the dumping of requirements for people with Covid to isolate. This is based on a self declared likely wave from Victoria and another variant of concern. So already we have a state unwilling to move past b grade mandates They are also only 2 spreadsheets of made up data away from face masks indoors. No transparency around what constitutes a wave. No transparency around what benchmarks will be used to retract restrictions W here is the insurmountable evidence that face masks in some situations can reduce hospital numbers during an out of control concerning outbreak?Just a blank cheque for health officials to enforce mask mandates. This shit should be illegal Face masks have multiple objectives. They work to reduce transmission and transmission of a high viral load. They are most effective when they worn correctly and worn by all parties in relatively close proximity. Lets just stop and think about someone else other than ourselves just for a minute. If you infect the health workers because you were infected, didn't know or didn't care, and didn't wear a mask as you flapped your lips at them, who will staff those hospitals help you if you get sick? (lets make it all about you and ignore that your actions risked someone else's health) My experience has been anyone who hasn't been hospitalized, or doesn't know someone who they care about who has gotten sick or died, simply doesn't give a fuck. I kind of knew it anyway working in health care for 30 years, but it confirmed that most-yes most-Australians are selfish cnuts. Is it any wonder health care staff are quitting or going part time? Why would anyone risk themselves to save cnuts who won't even put on a mask for even a short time? To you first point I agree but its not applicable. There havent been many instances of face masks being worn properly by all parties in the general public. A vaccine works because it has the same impact for all people regardless of educational, economic, or other differences. Face masks in the general population simply dont work in the real world. So why are they being pushed as the ONLY defence mechanism? Why is Queensland's ONLY general public advice for an amber alert face masks on buses? You have presented a hypothesis on how face masks might be able to provide some effectiveness, but the limitations and weaknesses you pointed out in your own view point pretty much destroys that idea. They simply arent an option if the objective is to reduce transmission. You need to hit the 99% not the 1% To your second (and third) point, face masks are regulated in hospitals and aged care. So steps and measures are being taken to protect these areas. And its not just face masks but other measures that are far more effective. There is no need for the emotive rhetoric. Objection to face masks in the general public as a sole control mechanism is not the same as objection to face masks in controlled situations where they have the most impact I think you're confused because on one hand you seem to care about the impact the virus has had, but on the other hand you seem to support policies that arent going to make a difference. Do you care or not? Face masks, at best, have been proven to reduce 10% of transmission (which even at that figure is a best guess). Its a hit and miss approach when a region is being swamped by the virus to try to shave 10% off deaths and hospitalisations - amongst other measures such as lock downs, work from home, quarantine, and border closures. Face masks on buses in isolation of these things is just power hungry health officials using their powers to enforce long term mask mandates for anything unrelated to the pandemic. And I'm the selfish one.... The advice in Queensland is when there is an outbreak of concern, all you have to do is slap on a face mask when using public transport and you have reduced your risk of infection, hospitalisation and even death. And if things escalate then all you have to do is slap on a face mask when your indoors. Thats what you're defending
|
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+xBased on the analysis of the publicly available information, it appears reasonable to conclude that the COVID-19 pandemic was, more likely than not, the result of a research-related incident. New information, made publicly available and independently verifiable, could change this assessment. However, the hypothesis of a natural zoonotic origin no longer deserves the benefit of the doubt, or the presumption of accuracy...... https://www.help.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/report_an_analysis_of_the_origins_of_covid-19_102722.pdfIt was a disgrace how the WHO, the Far Left and their sycophants in the traditional and online media buried the truth and labelled anyone who challenged their narrative as a "conspiracy theorist". Fucking lol. Classic Enzo. This report doesn't "prove" anything and their are several rebuttals already from a myriad of experts, breaking down the method and content whilst criticising the conclusive nature of the report. But "huuurrr duiurrr everything I don't like is far left"
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xBased on the analysis of the publicly available information, it appears reasonable to conclude that the COVID-19 pandemic was, more likely than not, the result of a research-related incident. New information, made publicly available and independently verifiable, could change this assessment. However, the hypothesis of a natural zoonotic origin no longer deserves the benefit of the doubt, or the presumption of accuracy...... https://www.help.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/report_an_analysis_of_the_origins_of_covid-19_102722.pdfIt was a disgrace how the WHO, the Far Left and their sycophants in the traditional and online media buried the truth and labelled anyone who challenged their narrative as a "conspiracy theorist". Fucking lol. Classic Enzo. This report doesn't "prove" anything and their are several rebuttals already from a myriad of experts, breaking down the method and content whilst criticising the conclusive nature of the report. But "huuurrr duiurrr everything I don't like is far left" Clearly you're incapable of assessing the report so watch this video by Dr John Campbell: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EaJt5jC5gbYAs for the conclusive nature of the report the conclusion literally says: New information, made publicly available and independently verifiable, could change this assessment The "rebuttals" are from the experts with skin in the game covering their own arses, the same "experts" who advised on the the biggest scientific cock up in human history. They (and the media) that ran the zoonotic origin narrative simply cannot allow even the possibility that Trump was probably right. Again.
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xBased on the analysis of the publicly available information, it appears reasonable to conclude that the COVID-19 pandemic was, more likely than not, the result of a research-related incident. New information, made publicly available and independently verifiable, could change this assessment. However, the hypothesis of a natural zoonotic origin no longer deserves the benefit of the doubt, or the presumption of accuracy...... https://www.help.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/report_an_analysis_of_the_origins_of_covid-19_102722.pdfIt was a disgrace how the WHO, the Far Left and their sycophants in the traditional and online media buried the truth and labelled anyone who challenged their narrative as a "conspiracy theorist". Fucking lol. Classic Enzo. This report doesn't "prove" anything and their are several rebuttals already from a myriad of experts, breaking down the method and content whilst criticising the conclusive nature of the report. But "huuurrr duiurrr everything I don't like is far left" Clearly you're incapable of assessing the report so watch this video by Dr John Campbell: Dr John Campbell: "The doctorate was awarded in 2013 for work on developing teaching methods using digital media such as online videos."
Next you will be quoting Dr Dre for us
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xBased on the analysis of the publicly available information, it appears reasonable to conclude that the COVID-19 pandemic was, more likely than not, the result of a research-related incident. New information, made publicly available and independently verifiable, could change this assessment. However, the hypothesis of a natural zoonotic origin no longer deserves the benefit of the doubt, or the presumption of accuracy...... https://www.help.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/report_an_analysis_of_the_origins_of_covid-19_102722.pdfIt was a disgrace how the WHO, the Far Left and their sycophants in the traditional and online media buried the truth and labelled anyone who challenged their narrative as a "conspiracy theorist". Fucking lol. Classic Enzo. This report doesn't "prove" anything and their are several rebuttals already from a myriad of experts, breaking down the method and content whilst criticising the conclusive nature of the report. But "huuurrr duiurrr everything I don't like is far left" Clearly you're incapable of assessing the report so watch this video by Dr John Campbell: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EaJt5jC5gbYAs for the conclusive nature of the report the conclusion literally says: New information, made publicly available and independently verifiable, could change this assessment In other words, "this report is conclusive unless new evidence comes to light". So yes, "conclusive" is an accurate word to describe the nature of the report, regardless of what you think of its contents. Which has been pointed out to be fucking ridiculous by experts who you immediately dismiss on the basis little more than you don't like what they have said.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xBased on the analysis of the publicly available information, it appears reasonable to conclude that the COVID-19 pandemic was, more likely than not, the result of a research-related incident. New information, made publicly available and independently verifiable, could change this assessment. However, the hypothesis of a natural zoonotic origin no longer deserves the benefit of the doubt, or the presumption of accuracy...... https://www.help.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/report_an_analysis_of_the_origins_of_covid-19_102722.pdfIt was a disgrace how the WHO, the Far Left and their sycophants in the traditional and online media buried the truth and labelled anyone who challenged their narrative as a "conspiracy theorist". Fucking lol. Classic Enzo. This report doesn't "prove" anything and their are several rebuttals already from a myriad of experts, breaking down the method and content whilst criticising the conclusive nature of the report. But "huuurrr duiurrr everything I don't like is far left" Clearly you're incapable of assessing the report so watch this video by Dr John Campbell: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EaJt5jC5gbYAs for the conclusive nature of the report the conclusion literally says: New information, made publicly available and independently verifiable, could change this assessment In other words, "this report is conclusive unless new evidence comes to light". So yes, "conclusive" is an accurate word to describe the nature of the report, regardless of what you think of its contents. Which has been pointed out to be fucking ridiculous by experts who you immediately dismiss on the basis little more than you don't like what they have said. Claims to be a scientist too so technically should understand that.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xBased on the analysis of the publicly available information, it appears reasonable to conclude that the COVID-19 pandemic was, more likely than not, the result of a research-related incident. New information, made publicly available and independently verifiable, could change this assessment. However, the hypothesis of a natural zoonotic origin no longer deserves the benefit of the doubt, or the presumption of accuracy...... https://www.help.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/report_an_analysis_of_the_origins_of_covid-19_102722.pdfIt was a disgrace how the WHO, the Far Left and their sycophants in the traditional and online media buried the truth and labelled anyone who challenged their narrative as a "conspiracy theorist". Fucking lol. Classic Enzo. This report doesn't "prove" anything and their are several rebuttals already from a myriad of experts, breaking down the method and content whilst criticising the conclusive nature of the report. But "huuurrr duiurrr everything I don't like is far left" Clearly you're incapable of assessing the report so watch this video by Dr John Campbell: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EaJt5jC5gbYAs for the conclusive nature of the report the conclusion literally says: New information, made publicly available and independently verifiable, could change this assessment In other words, "this report is conclusive unless new evidence comes to light". So yes, "conclusive" is an accurate word to describe the nature of the report, regardless of what you think of its contents. Which has been pointed out to be fucking ridiculous by experts who you immediately dismiss on the basis little more than you don't like what they have said. Rubbish. "Conclusive" means: "putting an end to debate or question especially by reason of irrefutability." Synonyms: The report literally says the debate or question is open to being changed if and when new information comes to light. Who are these experts? The same "experts" who wrote an article in the Lancet dismissing the Lab Leak Theory before *any* investigation had taken place, lead by the guy who had $100 million commercial relationship with the Wuhan Virus Institute. Both the Journal and the "expert" authors of that letter have been widely condemned. Or the ones who still work in similar research labs? If its is confirmed that Covid had a lab origin the "experts" know that the next step will be demands to shut their labs down. Career and $millions down the toilet. There's a lot riding on how the virus originated. For them personally. Not to mention there's mid-terms in the US so the Dems and their sycophants in the media want to bury it. So fuck the "experts".
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xBased on the analysis of the publicly available information, it appears reasonable to conclude that the COVID-19 pandemic was, more likely than not, the result of a research-related incident. New information, made publicly available and independently verifiable, could change this assessment. However, the hypothesis of a natural zoonotic origin no longer deserves the benefit of the doubt, or the presumption of accuracy...... https://www.help.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/report_an_analysis_of_the_origins_of_covid-19_102722.pdfIt was a disgrace how the WHO, the Far Left and their sycophants in the traditional and online media buried the truth and labelled anyone who challenged their narrative as a "conspiracy theorist". Fucking lol. Classic Enzo. This report doesn't "prove" anything and their are several rebuttals already from a myriad of experts, breaking down the method and content whilst criticising the conclusive nature of the report. But "huuurrr duiurrr everything I don't like is far left" Clearly you're incapable of assessing the report so watch this video by Dr John Campbell: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EaJt5jC5gbYAs for the conclusive nature of the report the conclusion literally says: New information, made publicly available and independently verifiable, could change this assessment In other words, "this report is conclusive unless new evidence comes to light". So yes, "conclusive" is an accurate word to describe the nature of the report, regardless of what you think of its contents. Which has been pointed out to be fucking ridiculous by experts who you immediately dismiss on the basis little more than you don't like what they have said. Not to mention there's mid-terms in the US so the Dems and their sycophants in the media want to bury it. Gee I wonder if the midterms had anything to do with the timing of releasing this report? Nah, of course not. Just a coincidence of course, unlike those pesky lefty experts with their "agendas" and "peer reviewed research". Why do we listen to them instead of Alex Jones? The world has gone mad.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
Another question Enzo, if the report isn't "conclusive" as you are now trying to argue, why did you originally claim that it was evidence of "the truth"? Keep moving them goalposts mate.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
bluebird2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 648,
Visits: 0
|
Well I guess that answers that question
Queensland are at 500 cases a day (15% increase) and about 200 in hospital and thats enough to warrant the shift to an amber alert
But lets be clear here. This self declared beginning of the next big wave can be entirely avoided if people wear face masks on buses, as well as indoors if they can't socially distance. Thats all it takes
No wonder so many Australians began ignoring health advice. The level of self interest is satirical
|
|
|
Butler99
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1K,
Visits: 0
|
What booster shots are you guys on here?? Any crack 6 or 7 by now?
|
|
|
Butler99
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWhat booster shots are you guys on here?? Any crack 6 or 7 by now? For anyone under 30 best you don't get a 4th jab. Or so this anti-vaxxer news outlet is reporting. Where's the damn misinformation message on this report.
|
|
|
dirk vanadidas
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
UK now suffering from cancer excess deaths due to shut down if health service to deal with a cold aka covid
Europe is funding the war not Chelsea football club
|
|
|
Butler99
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1K,
Visits: 0
|
So what's the latest with the number of doses??
Are people still getting the shots every 3 months??
You know. To keep everyone safe.
|
|
|
johnsmith
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xSo what's the latest with the number of doses?? Are people still getting the shots every 3 months?? You know. To keep everyone safe. When you say that a deciding factor is "to keep everyone safe", as of December 2022 are you aware that Pfizer, on video testimony, have testified to the European Union Parliament that their Pfizer vaccines were never tested for transmission? This validates a lot of evidence before that date, but this now is from Pfizer's own executives on record. https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/human-body/pfizer-did-not-know-whether-covid-vaccine-stopped-transmission-before-rollout-executive-admits/news-story/f307f28f794e173ac017a62784fec414https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/human-body/yes-they-claimed-the-vaccines-would-prevent-transmission/news-story/a176eb002c29e603fc29ef9fe0b33b18I realise that by now at the end of 2022, it's common to hear people say: "I've had x number of shots, and no more". The following is my personal opinion based on my reading or viewing of evidence: 1) You can go to the New South Wales government health website, and see the statistics of the number of infections, ICU and deaths, relative to number of doses. https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/covid-19/Pages/weekly-reports.aspxIn the above webpage at the right corner, there is a link to the latest Epidemiological report. As of today, the latest is "COVID-19 Weekly Data Overview - Epidemiological week 50, ending 17 December 2022", linked below: https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/covid-19/Documents/weekly-covid-overview-20221217.pdfAt the bottom of page 4 of that NSW government document, you can see number of infections, I.C.U and deaths, versus number of doses: none, one, two, three, four. To my eye, the infections/ICU/Deaths increase with the number of doses.  I've reproduced the relevant chart above. Notice that the Infections/ICU/Deaths are heavily weighted towards people above 60. For the sake of discussion -- where we tackle topics, even if it can be potentially upsetting -- there are doctors/vaccinologists out there who actually predicted in early 2021 that this would happen. Their premise is that the nature of mRNA vaccines was that it damages the person's natural immune system. Hence, increasing number of doses progressively degrades the person's natural immune system. The European Medicines Agency (EMA, which is equivalent to our TGA and the USA's FDA) said that at the start of 2021. A quote from the following Bloomberg article of what the EMA said: "European Union regulators warned that frequent Covid-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune response and may not be feasible." https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-01-11/repeat-booster-shots-risk-overloading-immune-system-ema-saysAn interesting anecdote from the European Union Parliament is these MP's pointing out that: (Quote) “The excess mortality rate across the EU has increased by 16% more than the average. If you look at the map, the countries with the highest vaccination rates currently have the highest excess mortality rate.” -@CristianTerhes - EU Press conference - 11 Oct 2022. https://twitter.com/SikhForTruth/status/1579915663023673344? From my perspective: even if you decide not to get further shots, from what I've read the time to have decided on the MRNA shots was before you even took the first one. The reason is that even one shot has a negative impact on the natural immune system. But for many people, what is done is done. Have you caught up with the latest testimonies of Dr. Kerryn Phelps and her partner getting serious vaccine damage? https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/human-body/dr-kerryn-phelps-reveals-devastating-covid-vaccine-injury-says-doctors-have-been-censored/news-story/0c1fa02818c99a5ff65f5bf852a382cfhttps://www.news.com.au/technology/science/human-body/ask-ahpra-dr-kerryn-phelps-doesnt-know-why-regulator-silenced-doctors-on-vaccine-injuries/news-story/a731a655120649f913c8170bfbf1bb96
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWhat booster shots are you guys on here?? Any crack 6 or 7 by now? How many times are you going to post this and think it's either funny or smart? It's not even true. It's like you're stuck in a time warp from 12 months ago.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
johnsmith
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Do you think "1 in 800" risk of severe adverse side effect is "safe and effective"? Doctors UCLA (University of California at Los Angeles), Stanford University, and the University of Maryland, and from Spain and Australia - they reviewed the Pfizer and Moderna trials data, and concluded: (Quote) "Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 vaccinated" That's a 1 in 800 risk.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428332/I became aware of this research paper (31 August 2022) from videos by Dr. Asseem Malhotra and Dr John Campbell: Interview with Dr Assem Malhotra https://youtu.be/4MKQ0krjLpoVideo by Dr John Campbell https://youtu.be/JYR1wz-Cf_MBy and large, the medical establishment is burying its head in the sand.
|
|
|
johnsmith
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
The Cleveland Clinic is consistently ranked among the top 10 hospitals in America. Currently the Cleveland Clinic ranks No.2 in the best hospitals in the world, behind the Mayo Clinic. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_Clinichttps://spectrumnews1.com/oh/columbus/news/2022/03/02/cleveland-clinic-ranks-no--2-as-world-s-best-hospital________ The Cleveland Clinic published a medical journal article dated 19 December 2022 which shows that: - the greater number of Covid vaccines, the greater chance of getting Covid. Compared to an un-vaccinated person, a vaccinated person has the following greater chance of getting Covid:
One dose, 1.7x more likely to get Covid
Two doses, 2.63x more likely to get Covid
Three doses, 3.1x more likely to get Covid
More than three doses, 3.8x more likely to get CovidQuote from the Cleveland Clinic paper: (Quote) "Despite this, their risk of acquiring COVID-19 was lower than those who received a larger number of prior vaccine doses. This is not the only study to find a possible association with more prior vaccine doses and higher risk of COVID-19. A large study found that those who had an Omicron variant infection after previously receiving three doses of vaccine had a higher risk of reinfection than those who had an Omicron variant infection after previously receiving two doses of vaccine [21]. Another study found that receipt of two or three doses of a mRNA vaccine following prior COVID-19 was associated with a higher risk of reinfection than receipt of a single dose [7]. We still have a lot to learn about protection from COVID-19 vaccination, and in addition to a vaccine’s effectiveness it is important to examine whether multiple vaccine doses given over time may not be having the beneficial effect that is generally assumed." Link to the Cleveland Clinic journal article: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1.full________The Cleveland Clinic scientific journal article was reported by Dr John Campbell:https://youtu.be/Rh7I7fKmzT0Note that Dr. John Campbell, who made the above video, at the start was totally pro-vaccine. But he is slowly shifting his stance.________ The Cleveland Clinic data corresponds to the data at the NSW government Health website.  (To see this chart, click the "weekly report" and go to Table 1). https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/covid-19/Pages/weekly-reports.aspx________ A possible reason that greater number of Covid vaccines gives greater chance of getting Covid, was given by the European Medicines Agency back in early 2022 - 1 year ago - quote: " European Union regulators warned that frequent Covid-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune response and may not be feasible." https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-01-11/repeat-booster-shots-risk-overloading-immune-system-ema-says________ Also, given that in around March 2021 - close to 2 years ago - when the worldwide vaccine rollouts were just beginning, Dr Geert Vanden Bossche predicted all this. But, to search for him on the internet, you'll have to get past the numerous Mainstream articles rubbishing and slandering him.
|
|
|
Butler99
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xWhat booster shots are you guys on here?? Any crack 6 or 7 by now? How many times are you going to post this and think it's either funny or smart? It's not even true. It's like you're stuck in a time warp from 12 months ago. Maybe until someone answers the question?? Can I get my first and second now?? Will it still "work"? Are unvaccinated still a danger to the public?? Do I still have to mask up when I'm driving alone in the car?
|
|
|
johnsmith
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xWhat booster shots are you guys on here?? Any crack 6 or 7 by now? How many times are you going to post this and think it's either funny or smart? It's not even true. It's like you're stuck in a time warp from 12 months ago. Maybe until someone answers the question?? Can I get my first and second now?? Will it still "work"? Are unvaccinated still a danger to the public?? Do I still have to mask up when I'm driving alone in the car? May I answer your question, with another question? Do you see an answer to your question from this Table from NSW Health?  (Would you like to see this chart, by click the "weekly report" and go to Table 1 ?) https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/covid-19/Pages/weekly-reports.aspx
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xWhat booster shots are you guys on here?? Any crack 6 or 7 by now? How many times are you going to post this and think it's either funny or smart? It's not even true. It's like you're stuck in a time warp from 12 months ago. Maybe until someone answers the question?? Can I get my first and second now?? Will it still "work"? Are unvaccinated still a danger to the public?? Do I still have to mask up when I'm driving alone in the car? You can answer the question by looking up the recommendations made by health departments in Australia in regards to vaccination by age, heath status and other factors. You can also look at data by state as to how many people have had 2, 3 or 4 shots. But you know that.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
johnsmith
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xWhat booster shots are you guys on here?? Any crack 6 or 7 by now? How many times are you going to post this and think it's either funny or smart? It's not even true. It's like you're stuck in a time warp from 12 months ago. Maybe until someone answers the question?? Can I get my first and second now?? Will it still "work"? Are unvaccinated still a danger to the public?? Do I still have to mask up when I'm driving alone in the car? You can answer the question by looking up the recommendations made by health departments in Australia in regards to vaccination by age, heath status and other factors. You can also look at data by state as to how many people have had 2, 3 or 4 shots. But you know that. So, in other words, in early 2023, sydneyfc1987 is still sticking to the "government knows best" line. Your worldview is that, the instant a doctor becomes a government employee, it then becomes impossible for that government doctor to ever make wrong policy decision. Good luck, mate. I believe 2023 is a transition year where more people start to realise the danger of the new mRNA vaccine technology, in comparison to past conventional vaccine technology used for hundreds of years,. The data of MRNA danger has been there since 2021 -- but the brick wall has been people's herd-mentality to never question anything handed down to you by those above. Here's some examples of how the tide is turning: I have a friend who is a medical researcher at a local university. Over the course of the Covid years of 2021-2022, this person has been the biggest attacker on my social media. Whenever I posted articles about the dangers of the mRNA vaccines, this person always came in to so-called debunk what I wrote, basing his authority on the fact he is a university medical researcher, whereas I am not trained in the biological sciences. Now, in late 2022, for the first time -- regarding the Cleveland Clinic's 19 December 2022 paper on the " possible association with more prior vaccine doses and higher risk of COVID-19", for the first time, he admitted there could be something in it, and wondered how the medical community would response to the Cleveland Clinic journal article.Another friend who has a biotech degree from an Australian university. From the start of the Covid period, that friend has been 100% in favour of the MRNA vaccines, claiming that they have reviewed the literature and was therefore confident to allow their young children to be vaccinated. At the start of the MRNA vaccine rollout, I remember having an hour long debate. At the end of it, my friend started shouting and drowning me out, as if to block any further comments from me. To them, I was talking absolute nonsense. Now, in December 2022, this friend admitted that there is a risk of myocarditis from the MRNA vaccines. You might scoff that the above are only my personal anecdotes. But it matches the realisation by eminent doctors. e.g. Dr. Aseem Malhotra had been totally pro-vax, and he himself got two shots, and was on TV encouraging everyone to get vaccinated. But, recently, in view of the emerging data, he has changed sides and is now warning everyone. e.g. Dr John Campbell, from the start of the pandemic, he had been pro-vax, but now has shifted to being alarmed at the latest data. You realise that, at the start of the vaccine rollout, the medical authorities refused to believe there was a risk of myocarditis, and it is only because of the overwhelming data that it is now undeniable that there is a myocarditis risk. People think that, even if there is a risk, it is minor -- and that most people escape it. But a review paper by UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) found it's around ONE IN 800. https://youtu.be/4MKQ0krjLpohttps://youtu.be/JYR1wz-Cf_MAnd 1 in 800 is just the people who develop discernible major side effects. Don't think the 799 get off the hook. The indications are that the immune system is damaged, which probably explains why the vast majority of Covid cases are among the vaccinated. And the higher the number of vaxes, the higher the hospitalisation/ICU/death rate.
|
|
|
johnsmith
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xYou can also look at data by state as to how many people have had 2, 3 or 4 shots.
I took your prompt, and looked up the latest vax-rate of 2, 3 or 4 shots. Here it is, latest dated 2 November 2022 for NSW.  33.6 % - 4 shot 33.9 % - 3 shot 28% approx - 2 shot 2% approx - 1 shots 6% approx - unvaccinated https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-01/covid-19-vaccine-rollout-update-06-january-2023.pdfHence, according to your logic, you would expect to see the greatest number of hospitalisations/ICU/deaths among the lower number of jabs. But it is the OPPOSITE. https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/covid-19/Documents/weekly-covid-overview-20221231.pdfYou see that the greater number of vaxes, the higher hospitalisation/ICU/deaths. This has been the pattern for most of 2022. Now, I am really upset. I just checked the NSW Health website for this week's (12 Jan 2023) Covid data -- and for the first time since the dosage data appeared last year, now they have omitted the dose data from Table 1. The higher-ups do not want the little people seeing this data.
|
|
|
Butler99
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xWhat booster shots are you guys on here?? Any crack 6 or 7 by now? How many times are you going to post this and think it's either funny or smart? It's not even true. It's like you're stuck in a time warp from 12 months ago. Maybe until someone answers the question?? Can I get my first and second now?? Will it still "work"? Are unvaccinated still a danger to the public?? Do I still have to mask up when I'm driving alone in the car? You can answer the question by looking up the recommendations made by health departments in Australia in regards to vaccination by age, heath status and other factors. You can also look at data by state as to how many people have had 2, 3 or 4 shots. But you know that. What I do know is that the stern supporters of the Vax mandates previously demonizing the unvaccinated has gone awfully quiet. The vigorous calls to deny them medical care, ban them from everything, lock them up has dissipated. And apparently exercising and being fit does the same thing as the Vax. Lessens severity. Who would've thunk it. https://www.washingtonpost.com/wellness/2022/12/21/covid-exercise-hospitalization-mortality/Surely government shouldve been pushing the "Life. Be in it" ads to help prevent severe symptoms. https://youtu.be/GNjEge3Awl8The recommendations seem to be that the Vax "effectiveness" diminishes after a few weeks or so too. Rendering everyone without a jab in last 3 months "unprotected"?
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xWhat booster shots are you guys on here?? Any crack 6 or 7 by now? How many times are you going to post this and think it's either funny or smart? It's not even true. It's like you're stuck in a time warp from 12 months ago. Maybe until someone answers the question?? Can I get my first and second now?? Will it still "work"? Are unvaccinated still a danger to the public?? Do I still have to mask up when I'm driving alone in the car? You can answer the question by looking up the recommendations made by health departments in Australia in regards to vaccination by age, heath status and other factors. You can also look at data by state as to how many people have had 2, 3 or 4 shots. But you know that. What I do know is that the stern supporters of the Vax mandates previously demonizing the unvaccinated has gone awfully quiet. So why are you stuck on repeat with this tired quip about lining up for a 6th or 7th shot when in reality you were completely wrong about constant jabs being a thing? Most Australians had one booster shot about a year ago and that's probably it for the foreseeable future.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
johnsmith
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xWhat booster shots are you guys on here?? Any crack 6 or 7 by now? How many times are you going to post this and think it's either funny or smart? It's not even true. It's like you're stuck in a time warp from 12 months ago. Maybe until someone answers the question?? Can I get my first and second now?? Will it still "work"? Are unvaccinated still a danger to the public?? Do I still have to mask up when I'm driving alone in the car? You can answer the question by looking up the recommendations made by health departments in Australia in regards to vaccination by age, heath status and other factors. You can also look at data by state as to how many people have had 2, 3 or 4 shots. But you know that. What I do know is that the stern supporters of the Vax mandates previously demonizing the unvaccinated has gone awfully quiet. So why are you stuck on repeat with this tired quip about lining up for a 6th or 7th shot when in reality you were completely wrong about constant jabs being a thing? Most Australians had one booster shot about a year ago and that's probably it for the foreseeable future. You sound like your above rhetorical question is a bulletproof stance. It is not bulletproof because the scientific data, for a long time now, tells us that these MRNA vaccines wane after 3-4 months (which is why the authorities were coercing people to get their 2nd, 3rd, 4th shots all in about a year. Your statement above reveals your assumption that, if a person just gets ONE shot -- which wanes in 3-4 months -- then if that one-shot-person does not accept further shots -- he/she reverts to the condition of an un-vaccinated person. No, After taking one, two, three, four shots, and those wane after 3-4 months -- and then they do not go further -- that person is worse-off than an un-vaccinated person, because their immune system has been compromised. See my post above on the European Medicines Agency. While the un-vaccinated person has gone on to achieve true natural immunity, whereas the 1-vaxed, 2-vaxed, 3-vaxed, 4-vaxed has gotten a warped type of immunity based on the Alpha variant, and their natural immunity has been compromised. Look with your own eyes at this NSW data below. It shows that: the more number of vaxes, it leads to higher hospitalisation, ICU and deaths. This NSW data is not aberrant, because the NSW data agrees with the Cleveland Clinic report - which itself pointed to other large studies that had the same conclusion based on hard data. @sydneyfc1987, the cockiness that you have shown in insulting the scientists on the other side of the fence, is probably not based on your own extensive research and reading of evidence -- but more from a type of football-group-think that finds its confidence in being part of a large majority, who love nothing better than hurling "bottles" at the opposition. Except, this time, it is not a game. If these vaccines are truly dangerous, then our society has compromised, not just the people's health, but the health of the next generation of children, and the fertility of the female population.
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
Yeah, I'm not not biting with you anymore John. Those days are over.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
johnsmith
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xYeah, I'm not not biting with you anymore John. Those days are over. Ok, but remember, if you live in a fish bowl -- and you don't bite the food given to you -- the uneaten food starts to foul and stink the water. I think an appropriate time to review this would be in 1 year's time in January 2024. Between then, I suggest that, like I do, you keep a list of people in your circle who are young and relatively healthy who suddenly develop heart problems, Every few weeks, I seem to add to the list. Here's today's update: European Journal of Pediatrics dated 5 January 2023 Title: "Changes of ECG parameters after BNT162b2 vaccine in the senior high school students" Quote: "Among 7934 eligible students ... In total, 763 students (17.1%) had at least one cardiac symptom after the second vaccine dose, mostly chest pain and palpitations. ... Conclusion: Cardiac symptoms are common after the second dose of BNT162b2 vaccine,"The article says that major myocarditis, is 1 in 1,000. i.e. 0.1%. What sort of propaganda convinces parents that a "1 in 1,000" chance of getting a debilitating heart disease is an acceptable risk, instead of getting Covid for which young children mostly get over easily, with virtually zero chance of dying. And don't think the other 999 kids are ok. On a sliding scale, even if they did not get major myocarditis, but there would be heart damage to a different degree. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00431-022-04786-0Reported in this article https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/17-of-teens-had-heart-symptoms-after-second-pfizer-covid-jab-new-study/?And notice the new narrative is that it is now ok to get mild myocarditis. Why are the little un-thinking people so quick to believe that? Why are they not listening to those cardiologists who are warning that there is no such thing as mild myocarditis? I suggest you do a search, using quotation marks to find the phrase --- "no such thing as mild myocarditis" - and try not to use Google when searching for anything that goes against the official narrative. I dunno about you: but I would freak out if my kids had a 1 in 5 chance of a damaged heart, or 1 in 1,000 chance of major heart disease -- compared to a respiratory infection where kids have virtually zero probability of dying. This is why I did massive research BEFORE deciding whether take the Covid jabs. (I am not anti-vax, but I heeded the warnings of vaccinologists and people in the Pharma industry who were whistleblowing that the new MRNA technology was showing massive danger signals, compared to the older technology of vaccines used for hundreds of years). And when you do the search for "no such thing as mild myocarditis" -- after that, you can spot any propaganda Mainstream Media as being those who try to persuade you that it is totally fine to get "mild myocarditis". For example, Dr. Steven Pelech from the Division of Neurology in the Department of Medicine at the University of British Columbia (UBC) in Vancouver. He is a tenured professor at UBC and has been on faculty at the university since 1988. Pelech also serves as chair for Scientific and Medical Advisory Committee at the Canadian Covid Care Alliance. Dr. Pelech says: "“ Contrary to what a number of people have said, there is no such thing as ‘mild myocarditis’."https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/doctor-blasts-covid-19-vaccination-for-kids-no-such-thing-as-mild-myocarditis/So in the battle of experts, you going to go with the Mainstream Media, or go with experts who warn of dangers from the Covid vaccines. It really does come down to that.
|
|
|
johnsmith
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Let's do some calculations based on Pfizer's own data. Already in January 2023, it is no longer controversy that the mRNA vaccines have a risk of myocarditis heart problems. (Those of you who disagree are among the slow-in-the-uptake category). https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/australia/atagi-didnt-know-about-heightened-risk-of-myocarditis-in-young-men-until-five-months-after-pfizer-moderna-approval/news-story/8d9874d0acca0edbb49e626663625e39So let's look at Pfizer's own data here (which the Court forced Pfizer to hand over under Freedom of Information): https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdfhttps://www.reuters.com/legal/government/paramount-importance-judge-orders-fda-hasten-release-pfizer-vaccine-docs-2022-01-07/(Page 16) Cardiovascular AESI (Adverse Events of Special Interest) - 3.3% of injuries. (Page 20) Autoimmune - 2.5% of injuries (Page 21) Neurological - 1.2% of injuries (Page 19) Facial Paralysis - 1.07% of injuries (Page 23) Stroke - 0.6% of injuries If, by January 2023, the medical establishment are losing the ability to deny the risk of Cardiovascular issues (3.3%) - how soon before they are also forced to admit the next one down the list, Autoimmune (2.5%). Regarding facial paralysis (1.07%), like Justin Beiber having half his face paralysed (Ramsay Hunt Syndrome), and the NSW Minister getting Bells Palsy? https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/justin-bieber-reveals-why-half-his-face-is-paralyzed-cancels-tour/https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-08-19/nsw-minister-victor-dominello-bells-palsy-press-conference/100389606This is just an objective look at Pfizer's own data. You can't call this conspiracy or tin hat - because the link above is a Pfizer document. In closing, have a look at pages 30 to 38, in the APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST. If anyone gets one of these hundreds of injuries, and the injury happened pretty soon after getting the Pfizer Covid vaccine, it means you have no scientific basis for joking it was a "coincidence". Pfizer's own document lists all these hundreds of potential side effects, so you'd need to be a Melbourne Victory field squad member to ignore what Pfizer's document is telling you. And if you think these Pfizer Covid vaccine injuries are RARE, ask yourself: Is "1 in 800" risk of severe adverse side effect, "safe and effective" Doctors UCLA (University of California at Los Angeles), Stanford University, and the University of Maryland, and from Spain and Australia - they reviewed the Pfizer and Moderna trials data, and concluded: (Quote) "Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 vaccinated"That's 1 in 800.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9428332/And since I know some of you can't be bothered to click on the link to see the 1,290 potential side effects admitted by Pfizer, here they are. Remember, if a person gets any of these soon after the Pfizer Covid vaccine, it is not "following the science" to instantly say "coincidence".If you are one of those who habitually say "coincidence" to any injury appearing in the below list of 1,290 -- use this as a moment to realise you are one those who un-thinkingly never question the Media, rather than testing scientific evidence for yourself. Don't be too hard on yourself. For there to be the Masses of majority, there has to be many people like yourself who just go with the crowd. Note: Pfizer's document says this Appendix of 1,290 injuries are potentially f rom the vaccine itself -- not from long-Covid. (Now you know why, in the Court case, Pfizer wanted to keep this data hidden from the public for 75 years). https://news.bloomberglaw.com/health-law-and-business/why-a-judge-ordered-fda-to-release-covid-19-vaccine-data-prontoAPPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST 1p36 deletion syndrome; 2-Hydroxyglutaric aciduria; 5'nucleotidase increased; Acoustic neuritis; Acquired C1 inhibitor deficiency; Acquired epidermolysis bullosa; Acquired epileptic aphasia; Acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus; Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis; Acute encephalitis with refractory, repetitive partial seizures; Acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis; Acute flaccid myelitis; Acute haemorrhagic leukoencephalitis; Acute haemorrhagic oedema of infancy; Acute kidney injury; Acute macular outer retinopathy; Acute motor axonal neuropathy; Acute motor-sensory axonal neuropathy; Acute myocardialinfarction; Acute respiratory distress syndrome; Acute respiratory failure; Addison's disease; Administration site thrombosis; Administration site vasculitis; Adrenal thrombosis; Adverse event following immunisation; Ageusia; Agranulocytosis; Air embolism; Alanine aminotransferase abnormal; Alanine aminotransferase increased; Alcoholic seizure; Allergic bronchopulmonary mycosis; Allergic oedema; Alloimmune hepatitis; Alopecia areata; Alpers disease; Alveolar proteinosis; Ammonia abnormal; Ammonia increased; Amniotic cavity infection; Amygdalohippocampectomy; Amyloid arthropathy; Amyloidosis; Amyloidosis senile; Anaphylactic reaction; Anaphylactic shock; Anaphylactic transfusion reaction; Anaphylactoid reaction; Anaphylactoid shock; Anaphylactoid syndrome of pregnancy; Angioedema; Angiopathic neuropathy; Ankylosing spondylitis; Anosmia; Antiacetylcholine receptor antibody positive; Anti-actin antibody positive; Anti-aquaporin-4 antibody positive; Anti-basal ganglia antibody positive; Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positive; Anti-epithelial antibody positive; Anti-erythrocyte antibody positive; Anti-exosome complex antibody positive; AntiGAD antibody negative; Anti-GAD antibody positive; Anti-ganglioside antibody positive; Antigliadin antibody positive; Anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody positive; Anti-glomerular basement membrane disease; Anti-glycyl-tRNA synthetase antibody positive; Anti-HLA antibody test positive; Anti-IA2 antibody positive; Anti-insulin antibody increased; Anti-insulin antibody positive; Anti-insulin receptor antibody increased; Antiinsulin receptor antibody positive; Anti-interferon antibody negative; Anti-interferon antibody positive; Anti-islet cell antibody positive; Antimitochondrial antibody positive; Anti-muscle specific kinase antibody positive; Anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein antibodies positive; Anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein associated polyneuropathy; Antimyocardial antibody positive; Anti-neuronal antibody positive; Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody increased; Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positive; Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positive vasculitis; Anti-NMDA antibody positive; Antinuclear antibody increased; Antinuclear antibody positive; Antiphospholipid antibodies positive; Antiphospholipid syndrome; Anti-platelet antibody positive; Anti-prothrombin antibody positive; Antiribosomal P antibody positive; Anti-RNA polymerase III antibody positive; Anti-saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody test positive; Anti-sperm antibody positive; Anti-SRP antibody positive; Antisynthetase syndrome; Anti-thyroid antibody positive; Anti-transglutaminase antibody increased; Anti-VGCC antibody positive; AntiVGKC antibody positive; Anti-vimentin antibody positive; Antiviral prophylaxis; Antiviral treatment; Anti-zinc transporter 8 antibody positive; Aortic embolus; Aortic thrombosis; Aortitis; Aplasia pure red cell; Aplastic anaemia; Application site thrombosis; Application site vasculitis; Arrhythmia; Arterial bypass occlusion; Arterial bypass thrombosis; Arterial thrombosis; Arteriovenous fistula thrombosis; Arteriovenous graft site stenosis; Arteriovenous graft thrombosis; Arteritis; Arteritis coronary; Arthralgia; Arthritis; Arthritis enteropathic; Ascites; Aseptic cavernous sinus thrombosis; Aspartate aminotransferase abnormal; Aspartate aminotransferase increased; Aspartate-glutamate-transporter deficiency; AST to platelet ratio index increased; AST/ALT ratio abnormal; Asthma; Asymptomatic COVID19; Ataxia; Atheroembolism; Atonic seizures; Atrial thrombosis; Atrophic thyroiditis; Atypical benign partial epilepsy; Atypical pneumonia; Aura; Autoantibody positive; Autoimmune anaemia; Autoimmune aplastic anaemia; Autoimmune arthritis; Autoimmune blistering disease; Autoimmune cholangitis; Autoimmune colitis; Autoimmune demyelinating disease; Autoimmune dermatitis; Autoimmune disorder; Autoimmune encephalopathy; Autoimmune endocrine disorder; Autoimmune enteropathy; Autoimmune eye disorder; Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia; Autoimmune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; Autoimmune hepatitis; Autoimmune hyperlipidaemia; Autoimmune hypothyroidism; Autoimmune inner ear disease; Autoimmune lung disease; Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome; Autoimmune myocarditis; Autoimmune myositis; Autoimmune nephritis; Autoimmune neuropathy; Autoimmune neutropenia; Autoimmune pancreatitis; Autoimmune pancytopenia; Autoimmune pericarditis; Autoimmune retinopathy; Autoimmune thyroid disorder; Autoimmune thyroiditis; Autoimmune uveitis; Autoinflammation with infantile enterocolitis; Autoinflammatory disease; Automatism epileptic; Autonomic nervous system imbalance; Autonomic seizure; Axial spondyloarthritis; Axillary vein thrombosis; Axonal and demyelinating polyneuropathy; Axonal neuropathy; Bacterascites; Baltic myoclonic epilepsy; Band sensation; Basedow's disease; Basilar artery thrombosis; Basophilopenia; B-cell aplasia; Behcet's syndrome; Benign ethnic neutropenia; Benign familial neonatal convulsions; Benign familial pemphigus; Benign rolandic epilepsy; Beta-2 glycoprotein antibody positive; Bickerstaff's encephalitis; Bile output abnormal; Bile output decreased; Biliary ascites; Bilirubin conjugated abnormal; Bilirubin conjugated increased; Bilirubin urine present; Biopsy liver abnormal; Biotinidase deficiency; Birdshot chorioretinopathy; Blood alkaline phosphatase abnormal; Blood alkaline phosphatase increased; Blood bilirubin abnormal; Blood bilirubin increased; Blood bilirubin unconjugated increased; Blood cholinesterase abnormal; Blood cholinesterase decreased; Blood pressure decreased; Blood pressure diastolic decreased; Blood pressure systolic decreased; Blue toe syndrome; Brachiocephalic vein thrombosis; Brain stem embolism; Brain stem thrombosis; Bromosulphthalein test abnormal; Bronchial oedema; Bronchitis; Bronchitis mycoplasmal; Bronchitis viral; Bronchopulmonary aspergillosis allergic; Bronchospasm; BuddChiari syndrome; Bulbar palsy; Butterfly rash; C1q nephropathy; Caesarean section; Calcium embolism; Capillaritis; Caplan's syndrome; Cardiac amyloidosis; Cardiac arrest; Cardiac failure; Cardiac failure acute; Cardiac sarcoidosis; Cardiac ventricular thrombosis; Cardiogenic shock; Cardiolipin antibody positive; Cardiopulmonary failure; Cardio-respiratory arrest; Cardio-respiratory distress; Cardiovascular insufficiency; Carotid arterial embolus; Carotid artery thrombosis; Cataplexy; Catheter site thrombosis; Catheter site vasculitis; Cavernous sinus thrombosis; CDKL5 deficiency disorder; CEC syndrome; Cement embolism; Central nervous system lupus; Central nervous system vasculitis; Cerebellar artery thrombosis; Cerebellar embolism; Cerebral amyloid angiopathy; Cerebral arteritis; Cerebral artery embolism; Cerebral artery thrombosis; Cerebral gas embolism; Cerebral microembolism; Cerebral septic infarct; Cerebral thrombosis; Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis; Cerebral venous thrombosis; Cerebrospinal thrombotic tamponade; Cerebrovascular accident; Change in seizure presentation; Chest discomfort; ChildPugh-Turcotte score abnormal; Child-Pugh-Turcotte score increased; Chillblains; Choking; Choking sensation; Cholangitis sclerosing; Chronic autoimmune glomerulonephritis; Chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus; Chronic fatigue syndrome; Chronic gastritis; Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy; Chronic lymphocytic inflammation with pontine perivascular enhancement responsive to steroids; Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis; Chronic respiratory failure; Chronic spontaneous urticaria; Circulatory collapse; Circumoral oedema; Circumoral swelling; Clinically isolated syndrome; Clonic convulsion; Coeliac disease; Cogan's syndrome; Cold agglutinins positive; Cold type haemolytic anaemia; Colitis; Colitis erosive; Colitis herpes; Colitis microscopic; Colitis ulcerative; Collagen disorder; Collagen-vascular disease; Complement factor abnormal; Complement factor C1 decreased; Complement factor C2 decreased; Complement factor C3 decreased; Complement factor C4 decreased; Complement factor decreased; Computerised tomogram liver abnormal; Concentric sclerosis; Congenital anomaly; Congenital bilateral perisylvian syndrome; Congenital herpes simplex infection; Congenital myasthenic syndrome; Congenital varicella infection; Congestive hepatopathy; Convulsion in childhood; Convulsions local; Convulsive threshold lowered; Coombs positive haemolytic anaemia; Coronary artery disease; Coronary artery embolism; Coronary artery thrombosis; Coronary bypass thrombosis; Coronavirus infection; Coronavirus test; Coronavirus test negative; Coronavirus test positive; Corpus callosotomy; Cough; Cough variant asthma; COVID-19; COVID-19 immunisation; COVID-19 pneumonia; COVID-19 prophylaxis; COVID-19 treatment; Cranial nerve disorder; Cranial nerve palsies multiple; Cranial nerve paralysis; CREST syndrome; Crohn's disease; Cryofibrinogenaemia; Cryoglobulinaemia; CSF oligoclonal band present; CSWS syndrome; Cutaneous amyloidosis; Cutaneous lupus erythematosus; Cutaneous sarcoidosis; Cutaneous vasculitis; Cyanosis; Cyclic neutropenia; Cystitis interstitial; Cytokine release syndrome; Cytokine storm; De novo purine synthesis inhibitors associated acute inflammatory syndrome; Death neonatal; Deep vein thrombosis; Deep vein thrombosis postoperative; Deficiency of bile secretion; Deja vu; Demyelinating polyneuropathy; Demyelination; Dermatitis; Dermatitis bullous; Dermatitis herpetiformis; Dermatomyositis; Device embolisation; Device related thrombosis; Diabetes mellitus; Diabetic ketoacidosis; Diabetic mastopathy; Dialysis amyloidosis; Dialysis membrane reaction; Diastolic hypotension; Diffuse vasculitis; Digital pitting scar; Disseminated intravascular coagulation; Disseminated intravascular coagulation in newborn; Disseminated neonatal herpes simplex; Disseminated varicella; Disseminated varicella zoster vaccine virus infection; Disseminated varicella zoster virus infection; DNA antibody positive; Double cortex syndrome; Double stranded DNA antibody positive; Dreamy state; Dressler's syndrome; Drop attacks; Drug withdrawal convulsions; Dyspnoea; Early infantile epileptic encephalopathy with burst-suppression; Eclampsia; Eczema herpeticum; Embolia cutis medicamentosa; Embolic cerebellar infarction; Embolic cerebral infarction; Embolic pneumonia; Embolic stroke; Embolism; Embolism arterial; Embolism venous; Encephalitis; Encephalitis allergic; Encephalitis autoimmune; Encephalitis brain stem; Encephalitis haemorrhagic; Encephalitis periaxialis diffusa; Encephalitis post immunisation; Encephalomyelitis; Encephalopathy; Endocrine disorder; Endocrine ophthalmopathy; Endotracheal intubation; Enteritis; Enteritis leukopenic; Enterobacter pneumonia; Enterocolitis; Enteropathic spondylitis; Eosinopenia; Eosinophilic fasciitis; Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis; Eosinophilic oesophagitis; Epidermolysis; Epilepsy; Epilepsy surgery; Epilepsy with myoclonic-atonic seizures; Epileptic aura; Epileptic psychosis; Erythema; Erythema induratum; Erythema multiforme; Erythema nodosum; Evans syndrome; Exanthema subitum; Expanded disability status scale score decreased; Expanded disability status scale score increased; Exposure to communicable disease; Exposure to SARS-CoV-2; Eye oedema; Eye pruritus; Eye swelling; Eyelid oedema; Face oedema; Facial paralysis; Facial paresis; Faciobrachial dystonic seizure; Fat embolism; Febrile convulsion; Febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome; Febrile neutropenia; Felty's syndrome; Femoral artery embolism; Fibrillary glomerulonephritis; Fibromyalgia; Flushing; Foaming at mouth; Focal cortical resection; Focal dyscognitive seizures; Foetal distress syndrome; Foetal placental thrombosis; Foetor hepaticus; Foreign body embolism; Frontal lobe epilepsy; Fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus; Galactose elimination capacity test abnormal; Galactose elimination capacity test decreased; Gamma-glutamyltransferase abnormal; Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased; Gastritis herpes; Gastrointestinal amyloidosis; Gelastic seizure; Generalised onset non-motor seizure; Generalised tonic-clonic seizure; Genital herpes; Genital herpes simplex; Genital herpes zoster; Giant cell arteritis; Glomerulonephritis; Glomerulonephritis membranoproliferative; Glomerulonephritis membranous; Glomerulonephritis rapidly progressive; Glossopharyngeal nerve paralysis; Glucose transporter type 1 deficiency syndrome; Glutamate dehydrogenase increased; Glycocholic acid increased; GM2 gangliosidosis; Goodpasture's syndrome; Graft thrombosis; Granulocytopenia; Granulocytopenia neonatal; Granulomatosis with polyangiitis; Granulomatous dermatitis; Grey matter heterotopia; Guanase increased; GuillainBarre syndrome; Haemolytic anaemia; Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; Haemorrhage; Haemorrhagic ascites; Haemorrhagic disorder; Haemorrhagic pneumonia; Haemorrhagic varicella syndrome; Haemorrhagic vasculitis; Hantavirus pulmonary infection; Hashimoto's encephalopathy; Hashitoxicosis; Hemimegalencephaly; Henoch-Schonlein purpura; HenochSchonlein purpura nephritis; Hepaplastin abnormal; Hepaplastin decreased; Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; Hepatic amyloidosis; Hepatic artery embolism; Hepatic artery flow decreased; Hepatic artery thrombosis; Hepatic enzyme abnormal; Hepatic enzyme decreased; Hepatic enzyme increased; Hepatic fibrosis marker abnormal; Hepatic fibrosis marker increased; Hepatic function abnormal; Hepatic hydrothorax; Hepatic hypertrophy; Hepatic hypoperfusion; Hepatic lymphocytic infiltration; Hepatic mass; Hepatic pain; Hepatic sequestration; Hepatic vascular resistance increased; Hepatic vascular thrombosis; Hepatic vein embolism; Hepatic vein thrombosis; Hepatic venous pressure gradient abnormal; Hepatic venous pressure gradient increased; Hepatitis; Hepatobiliary scan abnormal; Hepatomegaly; Hepatosplenomegaly; Hereditary angioedema with C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency; Herpes dermatitis; Herpes gestationis; Herpes oesophagitis; Herpes ophthalmic; Herpes pharyngitis; Herpes sepsis; Herpes simplex; Herpes simplex cervicitis; Herpes simplex colitis; Herpes simplex encephalitis; Herpes simplex gastritis; Herpes simplex hepatitis; Herpes simplex meningitis; Herpes simplex meningoencephalitis; Herpes simplex meningomyelitis; Herpes simplex necrotising retinopathy; Herpes simplex oesophagitis; Herpes simplex otitis externa; Herpes simplex pharyngitis; Herpes simplex pneumonia; Herpes simplex reactivation; Herpes simplex sepsis; Herpes simplex viraemia; Herpes simplex virus conjunctivitis neonatal; Herpes simplex visceral; Herpes virus infection; Herpes zoster; Herpes zoster cutaneous disseminated; Herpes zoster infection neurological; Herpes zoster meningitis; Herpes zoster meningoencephalitis; Herpes zoster meningomyelitis; Herpes zoster meningoradiculitis; Herpes zoster necrotising retinopathy; Herpes zoster oticus; Herpes zoster pharyngitis; Herpes zoster reactivation; Herpetic radiculopathy; Histone antibody positive; Hoigne's syndrome; Human herpesvirus 6 encephalitis; Human herpesvirus 6 infection; Human herpesvirus 6 infection reactivation; Human herpesvirus 7 infection; Human herpesvirus 8 infection; Hyperammonaemia; Hyperbilirubinaemia; Hypercholia; Hypergammaglobulinaemia benign monoclonal; Hyperglycaemic seizure; Hypersensitivity; Hypersensitivity vasculitis; Hyperthyroidism; Hypertransaminasaemia; Hyperventilation; Hypoalbuminaemia; H ypocalcaemic seizure; Hypogammaglobulinaemia; Hypoglossal nerve paralysis; Hypoglossal nerve paresis; Hypoglycaemic seizure; Hyponatraemic seizure; Hypotension; Hypotensive crisis; Hypothenar hammer syndrome; Hypothyroidism; Hypoxia; Idiopathic CD4 lymphocytopenia; Idiopathic generalised epilepsy; Idiopathic interstitial pneumonia; Idiopathic neutropenia; Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; IgA nephropathy; IgM nephropathy; IIIrd nerve paralysis; IIIrd nerve paresis; Iliac artery embolism; Immune thrombocytopenia; Immunemediated adverse reaction; Immune-mediated cholangitis; Immune-mediated cholestasis; Immune-mediated cytopenia; Immune-mediated encephalitis; Immune-mediated encephalopathy; Immune-mediated endocrinopathy; Immune-mediated enterocolitis; Immunemediated gastritis; Immune-mediated hepatic disorder; Immune-mediated hepatitis; Immunemediated hyperthyroidism; Immune-mediated hypothyroidism; Immune-mediated myocarditis; Immune-mediated myositis; Immune-mediated nephritis; Immune-mediated neuropathy; Immune-mediated pancreatitis; Immune-mediated pneumonitis; Immune-mediated renal disorder; Immune-mediated thyroiditis; Immune-mediated uveitis; Immunoglobulin G4 related disease; Immunoglobulins abnormal; Implant site thrombosis; Inclusion body myositis; Infantile genetic agranulocytosis; Infantile spasms; Infected vasculitis; Infective thrombosis; Inflammation; Inflammatory bowel disease; Infusion site thrombosis; Infusion site vasculitis; Injection site thrombosis; Injection site urticaria; Injection site vasculitis; Instillation site thrombosis; Insulin autoimmune syndrome; Interstitial granulomatous dermatitis; Interstitial lung disease; Intracardiac mass; Intracardiac thrombus; Intracranial pressure increased; Intrapericardial thrombosis; Intrinsic factor antibody abnormal; Intrinsic factor antibody positive; IPEX syndrome; Irregular breathing; IRVAN syndrome; IVth nerve paralysis; IVth nerve paresis; JC polyomavirus test positive; JC virus CSF test positive; Jeavons syndrome; Jugular vein embolism; Jugular vein thrombosis; Juvenile idiopathic arthritis; Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy; Juvenile polymyositis; Juvenile psoriatic arthritis; Juvenile spondyloarthritis; Kaposi sarcoma inflammatory cytokine syndrome; Kawasaki's disease; Kayser-Fleischer ring; Keratoderma blenorrhagica; Ketosisprone diabetes mellitus; Kounis syndrome; Lafora's myoclonic epilepsy; Lambl's excrescences; Laryngeal dyspnoea; Laryngeal oedema; Laryngeal rheumatoid arthritis; Laryngospasm; Laryngotracheal oedema; Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults; LE cells present; Lemierre syndrome; Lennox-Gastaut syndrome; Leucine aminopeptidase increased; Leukoencephalomyelitis; Leukoencephalopathy; Leukopenia; Leukopenia neonatal; Lewis-Sumner syndrome; Lhermitte's sign; Lichen planopilaris; Lichen planus; Lichen sclerosus; Limbic encephalitis; Linear IgA disease; Lip oedema; Lip swelling; Liver function test abnormal; Liver function test decreased; Liver function test increased; Liver induration; Liver injury; Liver iron concentration abnormal; Liver iron concentration increased; Liver opacity; Liver palpable; Liver sarcoidosis; Liver scan abnormal; Liver tenderness; Low birth weight baby; Lower respiratory tract herpes infection; Lower respiratory tract infection; Lower respiratory tract infection viral; Lung abscess; Lupoid hepatic cirrhosis; Lupus cystitis; Lupus encephalitis; Lupus endocarditis; Lupus enteritis; Lupus hepatitis; Lupus myocarditis; Lupus myositis; Lupus nephritis; Lupus pancreatitis; Lupus pleurisy; Lupus pneumonitis; Lupus vasculitis; Lupus-like syndrome; Lymphocytic hypophysitis; Lymphocytopenia neonatal; Lymphopenia; MAGIC syndrome; Magnetic resonance imaging liver abnormal; Magnetic resonance proton density fat fraction measurement; Mahler sign; Manufacturing laboratory analytical testing issue; Manufacturing materials issue; Manufacturing production issue; Marburg's variant multiple sclerosis; Marchiafava-Bignami disease; Marine Lenhart syndrome; Mastocytic enterocolitis; Maternal exposure during pregnancy; Medical device site thrombosis; Medical device site vasculitis; MELAS syndrome; Meningitis; Meningitis aseptic; Meningitis herpes; Meningoencephalitis herpes simplex neonatal; Meningoencephalitis herpetic; Meningomyelitis herpes; MERS-CoV test; MERS-CoV test negative; MERS-CoV test positive; Mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis; Mesenteric artery embolism; Mesenteric artery thrombosis; Mesenteric vein thrombosis; Metapneumovirus infection; Metastatic cutaneous Crohn's disease; Metastatic pulmonary embolism; Microangiopathy; Microembolism; Microscopic polyangiitis; Middle East respiratory syndrome; Migraine-triggered seizure; Miliary pneumonia; Miller Fisher syndrome; Mitochondrial aspartate aminotransferase increased; Mixed connective tissue disease; Model for end stage liver disease score abnormal; Model for end stage liver disease score increased; Molar ratio of total branched-chain amino acid to tyrosine; Molybdenum cofactor deficiency; Monocytopenia; Mononeuritis; Mononeuropathy multiplex; Morphoea; Morvan syndrome; Mouth swelling; Moyamoya disease; Multifocal motor neuropathy; Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome; Multiple sclerosis; Multiple sclerosis relapse; Multiple sclerosis relapse prophylaxis; Multiple subpial transection; Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children; Muscular sarcoidosis; Myasthenia gravis; Myasthenia gravis crisis; Myasthenia gravis neonatal; Myasthenic syndrome; Myelitis; Myelitis transverse; Myocardial infarction; Myocarditis; Myocarditis post infection; Myoclonic epilepsy; Myoclonic epilepsy and ragged-red fibres; Myokymia; Myositis; Narcolepsy; Nasal herpes; Nasal obstruction; Necrotising herpetic retinopathy; Neonatal Crohn's disease; Neonatal epileptic seizure; Neonatal lupus erythematosus; Neonatal mucocutaneous herpes simplex; Neonatal pneumonia; Neonatal seizure; Nephritis; Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis; Neuralgic amyotrophy; Neuritis; Neuritis cranial; Neuromyelitis optica pseudo relapse; Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder; Neuromyotonia; Neuronal neuropathy; Neuropathy peripheral; Neuropathy, ataxia, retinitis pigmentosa syndrome; Neuropsychiatric lupus; Neurosarcoidosis; Neutropenia; Neutropenia neonatal; Neutropenic colitis; Neutropenic infection; Neutropenic sepsis; Nodular rash; Nodular vasculitis; Noninfectious myelitis; Noninfective encephalitis; Noninfective encephalomyelitis; Noninfective oophoritis; Obstetrical pulmonary embolism; Occupational exposure to communicable disease; Occupational exposure to SARS-CoV-2; Ocular hyperaemia; Ocular myasthenia; Ocular pemphigoid; Ocular sarcoidosis; Ocular vasculitis; Oculofacial paralysis; Oedema; Oedema blister; Oedema due to hepatic disease; Oedema mouth; Oesophageal achalasia; Ophthalmic artery thrombosis; Ophthalmic herpes simplex; Ophthalmic herpes zoster; Ophthalmic vein thrombosis; Optic neuritis; Optic neuropathy; Optic perineuritis; Oral herpes; Oral lichen planus; Oropharyngeal oedema; Oropharyngeal spasm; Oropharyngeal swelling; Osmotic demyelination syndrome; Ovarian vein thrombosis; Overlap syndrome; Paediatric autoimmune neuropsychiatric disorders associated with streptococcal infection; Paget-Schroetter syndrome; Palindromic rheumatism; Palisaded neutrophilic granulomatous dermatitis; Palmoplantar keratoderma; Palpable purpura; Pancreatitis; Panencephalitis; Papillophlebitis; Paracancerous pneumonia; Paradoxical embolism; Parainfluenzae viral laryngotracheobronchitis; Paraneoplastic dermatomyositis; Paraneoplastic pemphigus; Paraneoplastic thrombosis; Paresis cranial nerve; Parietal cell antibody positive; Paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria; Partial seizures; Partial seizures with secondary generalisation; Patient isolation; Pelvic venous thrombosis; Pemphigoid; Pemphigus; Penile vein thrombosis; Pericarditis; Pericarditis lupus; Perihepatic discomfort; Periorbital oedema; Periorbital swelling; Peripheral artery thrombosis; Peripheral embolism; Peripheral ischaemia; Peripheral vein thrombus extension; Periportal oedema; Peritoneal fluid protein abnormal; Peritoneal fluid protein decreased; Peritoneal fluid protein increased; Peritonitis lupus; Pernicious anaemia; Petit mal epilepsy; Pharyngeal oedema; Pharyngeal swelling; Pityriasis lichenoides et varioliformis acuta; Placenta praevia; Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis; Pneumobilia; Pneumonia; Pneumonia adenoviral; Pneumonia cytomegaloviral; Pneumonia herpes viral; Pneumonia influenzal; Pneumonia measles; Pneumonia mycoplasmal; Pneumonia necrotising; Pneumonia parainfluenzae viral; Pneumonia respiratory syncytial viral; Pneumonia viral; POEMS syndrome; Polyarteritis nodosa; Polyarthritis; Polychondritis; Polyglandular autoimmune syndrome type I; Polyglandular autoimmune syndrome type II; Polyglandular autoimmune syndrome type III; Polyglandular disorder; Polymicrogyria; Polymyalgia rheumatica; Polymyositis; Polyneuropathy; Polyneuropathy idiopathic progressive; Portal pyaemia; Portal vein embolism; Portal vein flow decreased; Portal vein pressure increased; Portal vein thrombosis; Portosplenomesenteric venous thrombosis; Post procedural hypotension; Post procedural pneumonia; Post procedural pulmonary embolism; Post stroke epilepsy; Post stroke seizure; Post thrombotic retinopathy; Post thrombotic syndrome; Post viral fatigue syndrome; Postictal headache; Postictal paralysis; Postictal psychosis; Postictal state; Postoperative respiratory distress; Postoperative respiratory failure; Postoperative thrombosis; Postpartum thrombosis; Postpartum venous thrombosis; Postpericardiotomy syndrome; Post-traumatic epilepsy; Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome; Precerebral artery thrombosis; Pre-eclampsia; Preictal state; Premature labour; Premature menopause; Primary amyloidosis; Primary biliary cholangitis; Primary progressive multiple sclerosis; Procedural shock; Proctitis herpes; Proctitis ulcerative; Product availability issue; Product distribution issue; Product supply issue; Progressive facial hemiatrophy; Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; Progressive multiple sclerosis; Progressive relapsing multiple sclerosis; Prosthetic cardiac valve thrombosis; Pruritus; Pruritus allergic; Pseudovasculitis; Psoriasis; Psoriatic arthropathy; Pulmonary amyloidosis; Pulmonary artery thrombosis; Pulmonary embolism; Pulmonary fibrosis; Pulmonary haemorrhage; Pulmonary microemboli; Pulmonary oil microembolism; Pulmonary renal syndrome; Pulmonary sarcoidosis; Pulmonary sepsis; Pulmonary thrombosis; Pulmonary tumour thrombotic microangiopathy; Pulmonary vasculitis; Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease; Pulmonary venous thrombosis; Pyoderma gangrenosum; Pyostomatitis vegetans; Pyrexia; Quarantine; Radiation leukopenia; Radiculitis brachial; Radiologically isolated syndrome; Rash; Rash erythematous; Rash pruritic; Rasmussen encephalitis; Raynaud's phenomenon; Reactive capillary endothelial proliferation; Relapsing multiple sclerosis; Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; Renal amyloidosis; Renal arteritis; Renal artery thrombosis; Renal embolism; Renal failure; Renal vascular thrombosis; Renal vasculitis; Renal vein embolism; Renal vein thrombosis; Respiratory arrest; Respiratory disorder; Respiratory distress; Respiratory failure; Respiratory paralysis; Respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis; Respiratory syncytial virus bronchitis; Retinal artery embolism; Retinal artery occlusion; Retinal artery thrombosis; Retinal vascular thrombosis; Retinal vasculitis; Retinal vein occlusion; Retinal vein thrombosis; Retinol binding protein decreased; Retinopathy; Retrograde portal vein flow; Retroperitoneal fibrosis; Reversible airways obstruction; Reynold's syndrome; Rheumatic brain disease; Rheumatic disorder; Rheumatoid arthritis; Rheumatoid factor increased; Rheumatoid factor positive; Rheumatoid factor quantitative increased; Rheumatoid lung; Rheumatoid neutrophilic dermatosis; Rheumatoid nodule; Rheumatoid nodule removal; Rheumatoid scleritis; Rheumatoid vasculitis; Saccadic eye movement; SAPHO syndrome; Sarcoidosis; SARS-CoV-1 test; SARS-CoV-1 test negative; SARS-CoV-1 test positive; SARS-CoV-2 antibody test; SARS-CoV-2 antibody test negative; SARS-CoV-2 antibody test positive; SARS-CoV-2 carrier; SARS-CoV-2 sepsis; SARS-CoV-2 test; SARSCoV-2 test false negative; SARS-CoV-2 test false positive; SARS-CoV-2 test negative; SARSCoV-2 test positive; SARS-CoV-2 viraemia; Satoyoshi syndrome; Schizencephaly; Scleritis; Sclerodactylia; Scleroderma; Scleroderma associated digital ulcer; Scleroderma renal crisis; Scleroderma-like reaction; Secondary amyloidosis; Secondary cerebellar degeneration; Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis; Segmented hyalinising vasculitis; Seizure; Seizure anoxic; Seizure cluster; Seizure like phenomena; Seizure prophylaxis; Sensation of foreign body; Septic embolus; Septic pulmonary embolism; Severe acute respiratory syndrome; Severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy; Shock; Shock symptom; Shrinking lung syndrome; Shunt thrombosis; Silent thyroiditis; Simple partial seizures; Sjogren's syndrome; Skin swelling; SLE arthritis; Smooth muscle antibody positive; Sneezing; Spinal artery embolism; Spinal artery thrombosis; Splenic artery thrombosis; Splenic embolism; Splenic thrombosis; Splenic vein thrombosis; Spondylitis; Spondyloarthropathy; Spontaneous heparin-induced thrombocytopenia syndrome; Status epilepticus; Stevens-Johnson syndrome; Stiff leg syndrome; Stiff person syndrome; Stillbirth; Still's disease; Stoma site thrombosis; Stoma site vasculitis; Stress cardiomyopathy; Stridor; Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus; Subacute endocarditis; Subacute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy; Subclavian artery embolism; Subclavian artery thrombosis; Subclavian vein thrombosis; Sudden unexplained death in epilepsy; Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis; Susac's syndrome; Suspected COVID19; Swelling; Swelling face; Swelling of eyelid; Swollen tongue; Sympathetic ophthalmia; Systemic lupus erythematosus; Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index abnormal; Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index decreased; Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index increased; Systemic lupus erythematosus rash; Systemic scleroderma; Systemic sclerosis pulmonary; Tachycardia; Tachypnoea; Takayasu's arteritis; Temporal lobe epilepsy; Terminal ileitis; Testicular autoimmunity; Throat tightness; Thromboangiitis obliterans; Thrombocytopenia; Thrombocytopenic purpura; Thrombophlebitis; Thrombophlebitis migrans; Thrombophlebitis neonatal; Thrombophlebitis septic; Thrombophlebitis superficial; Thromboplastin antibody positive; Thrombosis; Thrombosis corpora cavernosa; Thrombosis in device; Thrombosis mesenteric vessel; Thrombotic cerebral infarction; Thrombotic microangiopathy; Thrombotic stroke; Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura; Thyroid disorder; Thyroid stimulating immunoglobulin increased; Thyroiditis; Tongue amyloidosis; Tongue biting; Tongue oedema; Tonic clonic movements; Tonic convulsion; Tonic posturing; Topectomy; Total bile acids increased; Toxic epidermal necrolysis; Toxic leukoencephalopathy; Toxic oil syndrome; Tracheal obstruction; Tracheal oedema; Tracheobronchitis; Tracheobronchitis mycoplasmal; Tracheobronchitis viral; Transaminases abnormal; Transaminases increased; Transfusion-related alloimmune neutropenia; Transient epileptic amnesia; Transverse sinus thrombosis; Trigeminal nerve paresis; Trigeminal neuralgia; Trigeminal palsy; Truncus coeliacus thrombosis; Tuberous sclerosis complex; Tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis syndrome; Tumefactive multiple sclerosis; Tumour embolism; Tumour thrombosis; Type 1 diabetes mellitus; Type I hypersensitivity; Type III immune complex mediated reaction; Uhthoff's phenomenon; Ulcerative keratitis; Ultrasound liver abnormal; Umbilical cord thrombosis; Uncinate fits; Undifferentiated connective tissue disease; Upper airway obstruction; Urine bilirubin increased; Urobilinogen urine decreased; Urobilinogen urine increased; Urticaria; Urticaria papular; Urticarial vasculitis; Uterine rupture; Uveitis; Vaccination site thrombosis; Vaccination site vasculitis; Vagus nerve paralysis; Varicella; Varicella keratitis; Varicella post vaccine; Varicella zoster gastritis; Varicella zoster oesophagitis; Varicella zoster pneumonia; Varicella zoster sepsis; Varicella zoster virus infection; Vasa praevia; Vascular graft thrombosis; Vascular pseudoaneurysm thrombosis; Vascular purpura; Vascular stent thrombosis; Vasculitic rash; Vasculitic ulcer; Vasculitis; Vasculitis gastrointestinal; Vasculitis necrotising; Vena cava embolism; Vena cava thrombosis; Venous intravasation; Venous recanalisation; Venous thrombosis; Venous thrombosis in pregnancy; Venous thrombosis limb; Venous thrombosis neonatal; Vertebral artery thrombosis; Vessel puncture site thrombosis; Visceral venous thrombosis; VIth nerve paralysis; VIth nerve paresis; Vitiligo; Vocal cord paralysis; Vocal cord paresis; Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease; Warm type haemolytic anaemia; Wheezing; White nipple sign; XIth nerve paralysis; X-ray hepatobiliary abnormal; Young's syndrome; Zika virus associated Guillain Barre syndrome.
|
|
|
johnsmith
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|