Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIm with you. Give them an inch and they will take a mile.
Just like the gay vote. They got the yes and look at them now - you can marry your pet, a table a family member. It’s absolute madness. If you want to end racism, you have to stop treating people differently based on their race. First Nations have been greatly disadvantaged based on outcomes. The Voice is an attempt to close the gap. So rather than federal and state funded health and social housing programs targeted at rectifying the imbalance of some of these "outcomes" you support an ambiguous "voice" to parliament for a very small minority of population, whose purpose is to represent Australian citizens who are somehow different than other Australia citizens because of their race? Or is it their colour, or maybe religion? . The gap between Indigenous folk and others in Aus are profound in education, health, housing and incarceration. The Voice is a mechanism to close the gap. It is not for non-Indigenous Aussies to find solutions and hand them down, but a grass roots First Nations paradigm that Aboriginals have conceived and developing from Indigenous stakeholders on the ground. Depends who these "others" are. The gap narrows if you look at the lives of non-indigenous in low socio-economic areas in the outskirts of capital cities. If you are middle class, live in the inner capital city, with the best infrastructure, schools, access to healthcare, public transport, and have nice public service job then you can be forgiven for believing every other non-indigenous group has it just as good as you. This is false. We are evaluating entire groups - overall. Of course there are disparities within the constituents of most groups. You're not doing that at all. You're dividing Australia into two groups: Indigenous and The Rest. The problem is that The Rest is made up of a diverse range of groups that may not have anything socio-economic, cultural, geographical and ancestral in common. You're also doing that as someone who belongs to the sub-group that is likely to be the most advantaged overall.
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xNo surprises of the freak shows at the no rally.
Nazis 5G Vaccine mandates digital currency paedo rings
Etc etc
just some of the brilliance on display 😂😂😂
I did laugh at the pictures of the 'No' campaigners. You forgot 'no 15 minute cities' but yeah a real cornucopia of nutjobs there. The usual suspects in abundance. Imagine if you were a 'no' campaigner in good faith and had to mix and talk with those fuckwits. Also the climate hoax gang were there. tbh if you are white, I can’t see why you’d be actively campaigning for ‘No’ - besides the obvious reason.
Fair enough of you want to Vite no, but making a sign and pushing it just makes you look unhinged In fairness mate, some of the wobble board, tin rattlers in the "yes" camp aren't exactly the sort of people I wold want to be in the same room, let alone have a conversation, with. Yeah the hair shirt mob are annoying too but in general they're not 5G annoying. You could play conspiracy bingo with 20 buzzwords on a card and you'd tick them off in 5 minutes flat at any No rally. I usually like in the comments on Facebook that are along the lines of 'have you had your 8th booster yet?' And then something about the gub'ment', Agenda 21, Moderna and Bill Gates. I actually think we probably reached peak average intelligence about 10 to 20 years after the internet became popular. And then vested interests realised you could say anything to anybody with no restrictions at all with predictable consequences.
The rise in flat earth beliefs as an example is just baffling. The movie Idiocracy is becoming more like a documentary every day. I'm on the local weather watch page in my town. Every other day some fucking clown is on there talking about chemtrails and weather engineering and how the gub'ment makes it rain whenever you want. When you ask them why we still have droughts that the government then has to pay out billions in supports it's just crickets or a link to a cloud seeding page somewhere as if that means 'case closed'. And it's not 1 or 2 either, there's dozens of the stupid pricks. Truer words have not been spoken (typed) Its a scary as fuck world out there.... I always thought Idiocracy was a prophetci movie ... In the land of the blind the one eyed man is king and all that. Mate how many of these people do you thin are out there? Seriously. Its like the gender and identity nut jobs pushing their ideologies. They're a blip in the overall population. But unlike the flat earthers, these nutjobs have wormed and infested government and school campuses, making them far more influential and dangerous. They're the ones you should be fearing, because their claws and tentacles reach far and wide and only growing. Agreed, it is a "blip" now butt it is rapidly growing thats the point.... Dan Andrews just resigned and my phone is going crazy with dildos celebrating like its some kind of win against the "axis of evil" ..... Their numbers growing is an outcome, not a cause. What's the cause? As for Dan Andrews, he be will remembered as the most divisive, disliked if not outright despised politician since Jeff Kennett. He leaves the State in more debt than NSW and QLD combined. He should have stayed to face the electorate. Makes one wonder how Dan was constantly re-elected by Victorians if he was so unpopular? He was unpopular in Right wing media outlets like Sky News, Fox and the general Rupert M owned media, because no matter how hard they campaigned to eject him as Victorian Premier, he constantly thwarted them. He is not polarising if decided majorities have kept electing him as Vic premier. A 9 year Premier's tenure is a pretty successful achievement! The Vic ALP only received 37% of the primary votes at the last "Danslide". In other words 2 in 3 people did not have the ALP as their first choice. But because there is no viable opposition in Victoria, the preferential votes went to them. This Editorial in The Age well summarizes Andrews rule: https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/was-it-the-right-time-for-andrews-to-quit-one-issue-provides-the-answer-20230926-p5e7s8.html
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIm with you. Give them an inch and they will take a mile.
Just like the gay vote. They got the yes and look at them now - you can marry your pet, a table a family member. It’s absolute madness. If you want to end racism, you have to stop treating people differently based on their race. First Nations have been greatly disadvantaged based on outcomes. The Voice is an attempt to close the gap. So rather than federal and state funded health and social housing programs targeted at rectifying the imbalance of some of these "outcomes" you support an ambiguous "voice" to parliament for a very small minority of population, whose purpose is to represent Australian citizens who are somehow different than other Australia citizens because of their race? Or is it their colour, or maybe religion? Everyone wants to help the least fortunate amongst us Decentric (at least those with a heart and conscious do) but Im afraid your referendum will fail simply because we are a progressive society and, mostly, see past the racist garbage of the past.... If the question on the ballot paper was more along the lines of "Do you agree to increase funding on health and housing programs and, crisis centres to combat alcoholism and child abuse issues affecting disadvantaged indigenous people: the answer would have been a resounding YES.... A bunch of doo-gooders telling us that they see "Indegenous Australians" as a different type of Australian is morally reprehensible... Huge NO vote from me. Even though the Noalition has argued the Voice is nebulous and not specific, they use the same tactics the conservatives have over any past plebiscite or referendum. Once The Voice is enshrined in the Constitution, the shape of it can evolve from there. It is simply an advisory body. I was reading in the New Daily yesterday the No campaign has employed an American company who have campaigned a lot for Trump, whose name I can't remember, to devise strategies for the No campaign. In terms of being a progressive society, many of my Indigenous comrades I've met through the Yes 23 Campaign, claim they suffer inadvertent racism all the time - still. There is also supposedly a differential depending on which part of Australia one lives in terms of latent and blatant racism. The fact that you intend do vote No augurs poorly for the Yes campaign succeeding. Given your previous posts over the years, I would have predicted you would vote Yes. It shows that the Trumpian company's tactics is indoctrinating Aussies successfully. My main hope is on the doors, and the Pre- Poll booths, in the last 3 weeks until October 14th. There will be a plethora of Yes volunteers on Pre - Poll booths for the early voters and voters on the day booths. Many won't take up their mind until walking into the booths. Yes 23 has decidedly more volunteers than the likes of Advance Australia and the Noalition. We will have more volunteers trying gto preside voters to vote Yes on the booths. More and more Liberal MPs are supporting Yes. Many volunteers won't door knock, which has a significant impact. I've persuaded heaps of vacillating voters to vote Yes knocking doors. It isn't 'white do-gooders' who've conceived The Voice. Many of us are supporting, and acting on, what over 80% of First Nations want. The First Nations conceived The Voice at the Uluru Statement of the Heart. Sorry Im not sure what the "Noalition" is but i assume some facile bon mot by the illluminated few? I wonder sometimes if political activists EVER live in the real world? As for your presumption of my politics, what would ever make you think I would be comfortable with considering a person more or less Australian in this country because of their race, colour or religion? I have been arguing that very thing over and over and over again on these pages.... Aboriginal Australians, Anglo Australians, Greek Australian etc etc etc are all JUST AUSTRALIANS... BTW You had to speak to an "indigenous comrade" to find out that racism still occurs in Australia in 2023??? There are millions of Aussies from the subcontinent ( thousands of times more than there are indigenous people) who get treated the same way every day, where is their "voice to parliament"? Nor sure what your point is? From the the volume of door knocking, holding stalls, teaching, working out in gyms, socialising in pubs and parties, etc, I meet heaps of regular Aussies. I'm very aware of how highly educated and articulate many of my political activist comrades are though. Not so much the union movement, but the Climate activists are. Heaps are academics. I don't condone racism at all. You don't condone racism? - the belief that different races possess distinct characteristics, abilities, or qualities, especially so as to distinguish them as inferior or superior to one another. Yet are proposing an amendment to the constitution which will benefit ONLY people of one race????? How does that work? How do you "benefit" a race of people without differentiating them based on their ancestry? This is EXACTLY my point.... higher education and articulate political rhetoric doesn't seem to correlate to any form of intelligence sadly.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIm with you. Give them an inch and they will take a mile.
Just like the gay vote. They got the yes and look at them now - you can marry your pet, a table a family member. It’s absolute madness. If you want to end racism, you have to stop treating people differently based on their race. First Nations have been greatly disadvantaged based on outcomes. The Voice is an attempt to close the gap. So rather than federal and state funded health and social housing programs targeted at rectifying the imbalance of some of these "outcomes" you support an ambiguous "voice" to parliament for a very small minority of population, whose purpose is to represent Australian citizens who are somehow different than other Australia citizens because of their race? Or is it their colour, or maybe religion? Everyone wants to help the least fortunate amongst us Decentric (at least those with a heart and conscious do) but Im afraid your referendum will fail simply because we are a progressive society and, mostly, see past the racist garbage of the past.... If the question on the ballot paper was more along the lines of "Do you agree to increase funding on health and housing programs and, crisis centres to combat alcoholism and child abuse issues affecting disadvantaged indigenous people: the answer would have been a resounding YES.... A bunch of doo-gooders telling us that they see "Indegenous Australians" as a different type of Australian is morally reprehensible... Huge NO vote from me. Even though the Noalition has argued the Voice is nebulous and not specific, they use the same tactics the conservatives have over any past plebiscite or referendum. Once The Voice is enshrined in the Constitution, the shape of it can evolve from there. It is simply an advisory body. I was reading in the New Daily yesterday the No campaign has employed an American company who have campaigned a lot for Trump, whose name I can't remember, to devise strategies for the No campaign. In terms of being a progressive society, many of my Indigenous comrades I've met through the Yes 23 Campaign, claim they suffer inadvertent racism all the time - still. There is also supposedly a differential depending on which part of Australia one lives in terms of latent and blatant racism. The fact that you intend do vote No augurs poorly for the Yes campaign succeeding. Given your previous posts over the years, I would have predicted you would vote Yes. It shows that the Trumpian company's tactics is indoctrinating Aussies successfully. My main hope is on the doors, and the Pre- Poll booths, in the last 3 weeks until October 14th. There will be a plethora of Yes volunteers on Pre - Poll booths for the early voters and voters on the day booths. Many won't take up their mind until walking into the booths. Yes 23 has decidedly more volunteers than the likes of Advance Australia and the Noalition. We will have more volunteers trying gto preside voters to vote Yes on the booths. More and more Liberal MPs are supporting Yes. Many volunteers won't door knock, which has a significant impact. I've persuaded heaps of vacillating voters to vote Yes knocking doors. It isn't 'white do-gooders' who've conceived The Voice. Many of us are supporting, and acting on, what over 80% of First Nations want. The First Nations conceived The Voice at the Uluru Statement of the Heart. Sorry Im not sure what the "Noalition" is but i assume some facile bon mot by the illluminated few? I wonder sometimes if political activists EVER live in the real world? As for your presumption of my politics, what would ever make you think I would be comfortable with considering a person more or less Australian in this country because of their race, colour or religion? I have been arguing that very thing over and over and over again on these pages.... Aboriginal Australians, Anglo Australians, Greek Australian etc etc etc are all JUST AUSTRALIANS... BTW You had to speak to an "indigenous comrade" to find out that racism still occurs in Australia in 2023??? There are millions of Aussies from the subcontinent ( thousands of times more than there are indigenous people) who get treated the same way every day, where is their "voice to parliament"? Nor sure what your point is? From the the volume of door knocking, holding stalls, teaching, working out in gyms, socialising in pubs and parties, etc, I meet heaps of regular Aussies. I'm very aware of how highly educated and articulate many of my political activist comrades are though. Not so much the union movement, but the Climate activists are. Heaps are academics. I don't condone racism at all. You don't condone racism? - the belief that different races possess distinct characteristics, abilities, or qualities, especially so as to distinguish them as inferior or superior to one another. Yet are proposing an amendment to the constitution which will benefit ONLY people of one race????? How does that work? How do you "benefit" a race of people without differentiating them based on their ancestry? This is EXACTLY my point.... higher education and articulate political rhetoric doesn't seem to correlate to any form of intelligence sadly. The Political Class- to which Decentric clearly belongs- call ANY act discrimination they approve of as "Affirmative Action". That way they can divide, discriminate, reject basic principles of fairness and justice and actually feel good about themselves doing it. Meanwhile they always seem to be the beneficiaries of all the inequality they are saying they are against: they re born to privileged families, they marry amongst themselves, they attend the best schools, live in the best suburbs, graduate from the best uni's, get the best paying jobs, have access to network with like others.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xNo surprises of the freak shows at the no rally.
Nazis 5G Vaccine mandates digital currency paedo rings
Etc etc
just some of the brilliance on display 😂😂😂
I did laugh at the pictures of the 'No' campaigners. You forgot 'no 15 minute cities' but yeah a real cornucopia of nutjobs there. The usual suspects in abundance. Imagine if you were a 'no' campaigner in good faith and had to mix and talk with those fuckwits. Also the climate hoax gang were there. tbh if you are white, I can’t see why you’d be actively campaigning for ‘No’ - besides the obvious reason.
Fair enough of you want to Vite no, but making a sign and pushing it just makes you look unhinged In fairness mate, some of the wobble board, tin rattlers in the "yes" camp aren't exactly the sort of people I wold want to be in the same room, let alone have a conversation, with. Yeah the hair shirt mob are annoying too but in general they're not 5G annoying. You could play conspiracy bingo with 20 buzzwords on a card and you'd tick them off in 5 minutes flat at any No rally. I usually like in the comments on Facebook that are along the lines of 'have you had your 8th booster yet?' And then something about the gub'ment', Agenda 21, Moderna and Bill Gates. I actually think we probably reached peak average intelligence about 10 to 20 years after the internet became popular. And then vested interests realised you could say anything to anybody with no restrictions at all with predictable consequences.
The rise in flat earth beliefs as an example is just baffling. The movie Idiocracy is becoming more like a documentary every day. I'm on the local weather watch page in my town. Every other day some fucking clown is on there talking about chemtrails and weather engineering and how the gub'ment makes it rain whenever you want. When you ask them why we still have droughts that the government then has to pay out billions in supports it's just crickets or a link to a cloud seeding page somewhere as if that means 'case closed'. And it's not 1 or 2 either, there's dozens of the stupid pricks. Truer words have not been spoken (typed) Its a scary as fuck world out there.... I always thought Idiocracy was a prophetci movie ... In the land of the blind the one eyed man is king and all that. Mate how many of these people do you thin are out there? Seriously. Its like the gender and identity nut jobs pushing their ideologies. They're a blip in the overall population. But unlike the flat earthers, these nutjobs have wormed and infested government and school campuses, making them far more influential and dangerous. They're the ones you should be fearing, because their claws and tentacles reach far and wide and only growing. Yeah I'm worried and gender nut jobs more than say right wing cookers who lock themselves away on a farm and then shoot policemen and their neighbours dead. Or neo Nazis that freely walk the streets Melbourne. Nothing to see here. One lot are annoying and a pain in the arse. One lot, yours, are dead set dangerous. One lot is tiny in number. affecting a tiny few The other is small but their influence is spreading like a cancer everywhere A tiny amount you say? 6100 comments about one council talking about 15 minute cities. https://fb.watch/njhsdjXpdx/?mibextid=CDWPTG95% thinking it's a giant conspiracy. And that's just those motivated enough to comment.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIm with you. Give them an inch and they will take a mile.
Just like the gay vote. They got the yes and look at them now - you can marry your pet, a table a family member. It’s absolute madness. If you want to end racism, you have to stop treating people differently based on their race. First Nations have been greatly disadvantaged based on outcomes. The Voice is an attempt to close the gap. So rather than federal and state funded health and social housing programs targeted at rectifying the imbalance of some of these "outcomes" you support an ambiguous "voice" to parliament for a very small minority of population, whose purpose is to represent Australian citizens who are somehow different than other Australia citizens because of their race? Or is it their colour, or maybe religion? . The gap between Indigenous folk and others in Aus are profound in education, health, housing and incarceration. The Voice is a mechanism to close the gap. It is not for non-Indigenous Aussies to find solutions and hand them down, but a grass roots First Nations paradigm that Aboriginals have conceived and developing from Indigenous stakeholders on the ground. And for the record, Im not a feeble minded child to have a wobble boarding, door knocking idiot preach to me about what my opinion should be on a particular topic and will take very poorly to being interrupted in my daily life by some numpty trying to convince me one way or another. And as for falling under the spell of Trump advisory marketing companies..... Ill ignore the implied insult. I haven't had an obnoxious householder yet in door knocking carried out in 11 suburbs and towns in Tas. A mate of mine did yesterday though. A few might say not interested and walk away shutting the door firmly. Many people under the age of 50 are keen to learn info about The Voice. People who state they have your attitude to door knockers if they aren't selling something, are rarely rude when presented in person with a door knocker. We attempt to be as polite as possible too. We always thank householders for their time. I've persuaded heaps of vacillating voters to vote Yes. So it is well worth knocking doors to meet people one would rarely meet outside one's echo chambers. Sorry I guess I fundamentally despise the practice of political canvasing in general... I can fend for myself and my views just fine (and to be honest I would be more inclined to give a firm but polite no rather than abuse ...despite my bluster on here)... I see pushing the point on impressionable voters as counter to true democracy and demagoguery of the first order... Trust the populace to make up their own minds and present your point in a coherent way in the media .. people deserve to NOT be pestered. 'people deserve to not be pestered'?! Surely advertising falls into your category? That's just another form of activism. In which case how do you determine what's allowed and what's not. I'm more concerned that politician donations don't have to be disclosed than some door knocker harassing me. The USA of all places have better laws around this than us.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xNo surprises of the freak shows at the no rally.
Nazis 5G Vaccine mandates digital currency paedo rings
Etc etc
just some of the brilliance on display 😂😂😂
I did laugh at the pictures of the 'No' campaigners. You forgot 'no 15 minute cities' but yeah a real cornucopia of nutjobs there. The usual suspects in abundance. Imagine if you were a 'no' campaigner in good faith and had to mix and talk with those fuckwits. Also the climate hoax gang were there. tbh if you are white, I can’t see why you’d be actively campaigning for ‘No’ - besides the obvious reason.
Fair enough of you want to Vite no, but making a sign and pushing it just makes you look unhinged In fairness mate, some of the wobble board, tin rattlers in the "yes" camp aren't exactly the sort of people I wold want to be in the same room, let alone have a conversation, with. Yeah the hair shirt mob are annoying too but in general they're not 5G annoying. You could play conspiracy bingo with 20 buzzwords on a card and you'd tick them off in 5 minutes flat at any No rally. I usually like in the comments on Facebook that are along the lines of 'have you had your 8th booster yet?' And then something about the gub'ment', Agenda 21, Moderna and Bill Gates. I actually think we probably reached peak average intelligence about 10 to 20 years after the internet became popular. And then vested interests realised you could say anything to anybody with no restrictions at all with predictable consequences.
The rise in flat earth beliefs as an example is just baffling. The movie Idiocracy is becoming more like a documentary every day. I'm on the local weather watch page in my town. Every other day some fucking clown is on there talking about chemtrails and weather engineering and how the gub'ment makes it rain whenever you want. When you ask them why we still have droughts that the government then has to pay out billions in supports it's just crickets or a link to a cloud seeding page somewhere as if that means 'case closed'. And it's not 1 or 2 either, there's dozens of the stupid pricks. Truer words have not been spoken (typed) Its a scary as fuck world out there.... I always thought Idiocracy was a prophetci movie ... In the land of the blind the one eyed man is king and all that. Mate how many of these people do you thin are out there? Seriously. Its like the gender and identity nut jobs pushing their ideologies. They're a blip in the overall population. But unlike the flat earthers, these nutjobs have wormed and infested government and school campuses, making them far more influential and dangerous. They're the ones you should be fearing, because their claws and tentacles reach far and wide and only growing. Yeah I'm worried and gender nut jobs more than say right wing cookers who lock themselves away on a farm and then shoot policemen and their neighbours dead. Or neo Nazis that freely walk the streets Melbourne. Nothing to see here. One lot are annoying and a pain in the arse. One lot, yours, are dead set dangerous. One lot is tiny in number. affecting a tiny few The other is small but their influence is spreading like a cancer everywhere A tiny amount you say? 6100 comments about one council talking about 15 minute cities. https://fb.watch/njhsdjXpdx/?mibextid=CDWPTG95% thinking it's a giant conspiracy. And that's just those motivated enough to comment. I'd never heard of 15 minute cities. Thanks for bringing it my attention. Seems to be range of views though-some crazy-talk protests, and others not so crazy like protesting the outlawing of car usage, the excessive use of cameras and face recognition to police it. People have a right to oppose these things, and its not outrageous to say that government control will grow as the population explosion mainly driven by immigration into Western countries and into the capital cities accelerates further. No-one voted for that but the governments are doing it anyway.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIm with you. Give them an inch and they will take a mile.
Just like the gay vote. They got the yes and look at them now - you can marry your pet, a table a family member. It’s absolute madness. If you want to end racism, you have to stop treating people differently based on their race. First Nations have been greatly disadvantaged based on outcomes. The Voice is an attempt to close the gap. So rather than federal and state funded health and social housing programs targeted at rectifying the imbalance of some of these "outcomes" you support an ambiguous "voice" to parliament for a very small minority of population, whose purpose is to represent Australian citizens who are somehow different than other Australia citizens because of their race? Or is it their colour, or maybe religion? . The gap between Indigenous folk and others in Aus are profound in education, health, housing and incarceration. The Voice is a mechanism to close the gap. It is not for non-Indigenous Aussies to find solutions and hand them down, but a grass roots First Nations paradigm that Aboriginals have conceived and developing from Indigenous stakeholders on the ground. And for the record, Im not a feeble minded child to have a wobble boarding, door knocking idiot preach to me about what my opinion should be on a particular topic and will take very poorly to being interrupted in my daily life by some numpty trying to convince me one way or another. And as for falling under the spell of Trump advisory marketing companies..... Ill ignore the implied insult. I haven't had an obnoxious householder yet in door knocking carried out in 11 suburbs and towns in Tas. A mate of mine did yesterday though. A few might say not interested and walk away shutting the door firmly. Many people under the age of 50 are keen to learn info about The Voice. People who state they have your attitude to door knockers if they aren't selling something, are rarely rude when presented in person with a door knocker. We attempt to be as polite as possible too. We always thank householders for their time. I've persuaded heaps of vacillating voters to vote Yes. So it is well worth knocking doors to meet people one would rarely meet outside one's echo chambers. Sorry I guess I fundamentally despise the practice of political canvasing in general... I can fend for myself and my views just fine (and to be honest I would be more inclined to give a firm but polite no rather than abuse ...despite my bluster on here)... I see pushing the point on impressionable voters as counter to true democracy and demagoguery of the first order... Trust the populace to make up their own minds and present your point in a coherent way in the media .. people deserve to NOT be pestered. 'people deserve to not be pestered'?! Surely advertising falls into your category? That's just another form of activism. In which case how do you determine what's allowed and what's not. I'm more concerned that politician donations don't have to be disclosed than some door knocker harassing me. The USA of all places have better laws around this than us. Advertisers use media like TV, radio, email, physical pamphlet delivered to your letter box. These are easily avoided with no confrontation. Door-knockers OTOH are physically on your premises, in your face and taking up your time. You have to physically confront them.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xNo surprises of the freak shows at the no rally.
Nazis 5G Vaccine mandates digital currency paedo rings
Etc etc
just some of the brilliance on display 😂😂😂
I did laugh at the pictures of the 'No' campaigners. You forgot 'no 15 minute cities' but yeah a real cornucopia of nutjobs there. The usual suspects in abundance. Imagine if you were a 'no' campaigner in good faith and had to mix and talk with those fuckwits. Also the climate hoax gang were there. tbh if you are white, I can’t see why you’d be actively campaigning for ‘No’ - besides the obvious reason.
Fair enough of you want to Vite no, but making a sign and pushing it just makes you look unhinged In fairness mate, some of the wobble board, tin rattlers in the "yes" camp aren't exactly the sort of people I wold want to be in the same room, let alone have a conversation, with. Yeah the hair shirt mob are annoying too but in general they're not 5G annoying. You could play conspiracy bingo with 20 buzzwords on a card and you'd tick them off in 5 minutes flat at any No rally. I usually like in the comments on Facebook that are along the lines of 'have you had your 8th booster yet?' And then something about the gub'ment', Agenda 21, Moderna and Bill Gates. I actually think we probably reached peak average intelligence about 10 to 20 years after the internet became popular. And then vested interests realised you could say anything to anybody with no restrictions at all with predictable consequences.
The rise in flat earth beliefs as an example is just baffling. The movie Idiocracy is becoming more like a documentary every day. I'm on the local weather watch page in my town. Every other day some fucking clown is on there talking about chemtrails and weather engineering and how the gub'ment makes it rain whenever you want. When you ask them why we still have droughts that the government then has to pay out billions in supports it's just crickets or a link to a cloud seeding page somewhere as if that means 'case closed'. And it's not 1 or 2 either, there's dozens of the stupid pricks. Truer words have not been spoken (typed) Its a scary as fuck world out there.... I always thought Idiocracy was a prophetci movie ... In the land of the blind the one eyed man is king and all that. Mate how many of these people do you thin are out there? Seriously. Its like the gender and identity nut jobs pushing their ideologies. They're a blip in the overall population. But unlike the flat earthers, these nutjobs have wormed and infested government and school campuses, making them far more influential and dangerous. They're the ones you should be fearing, because their claws and tentacles reach far and wide and only growing. Agreed, it is a "blip" now butt it is rapidly growing thats the point.... Dan Andrews just resigned and my phone is going crazy with dildos celebrating like its some kind of win against the "axis of evil" ..... Their numbers growing is an outcome, not a cause. What's the cause? As for Dan Andrews, he be will remembered as the most divisive, disliked if not outright despised politician since Jeff Kennett. He leaves the State in more debt than NSW and QLD combined. He should have stayed to face the electorate. There's multiple reasons which you could dissect for years. But here's one, the internet. Just think before the internet this sick fuck did this shit without an audience. https://www.news.com.au/national/northern-territory/clue-that-brought-down-northern-territory-dog-rapist-adam-robert-corden-britton/news-story/3e64cf64d7d3dc8818bf3e0b73af6ea0Flaying cunce like this alive is too good for them. This is just one example. The answer? Who knows. We can't turn the internet off.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xNo surprises of the freak shows at the no rally.
Nazis 5G Vaccine mandates digital currency paedo rings
Etc etc
just some of the brilliance on display 😂😂😂
I did laugh at the pictures of the 'No' campaigners. You forgot 'no 15 minute cities' but yeah a real cornucopia of nutjobs there. The usual suspects in abundance. Imagine if you were a 'no' campaigner in good faith and had to mix and talk with those fuckwits. Also the climate hoax gang were there. tbh if you are white, I can’t see why you’d be actively campaigning for ‘No’ - besides the obvious reason.
Fair enough of you want to Vite no, but making a sign and pushing it just makes you look unhinged In fairness mate, some of the wobble board, tin rattlers in the "yes" camp aren't exactly the sort of people I wold want to be in the same room, let alone have a conversation, with. Yeah the hair shirt mob are annoying too but in general they're not 5G annoying. You could play conspiracy bingo with 20 buzzwords on a card and you'd tick them off in 5 minutes flat at any No rally. I usually like in the comments on Facebook that are along the lines of 'have you had your 8th booster yet?' And then something about the gub'ment', Agenda 21, Moderna and Bill Gates. I actually think we probably reached peak average intelligence about 10 to 20 years after the internet became popular. And then vested interests realised you could say anything to anybody with no restrictions at all with predictable consequences.
The rise in flat earth beliefs as an example is just baffling. The movie Idiocracy is becoming more like a documentary every day. I'm on the local weather watch page in my town. Every other day some fucking clown is on there talking about chemtrails and weather engineering and how the gub'ment makes it rain whenever you want. When you ask them why we still have droughts that the government then has to pay out billions in supports it's just crickets or a link to a cloud seeding page somewhere as if that means 'case closed'. And it's not 1 or 2 either, there's dozens of the stupid pricks. Truer words have not been spoken (typed) Its a scary as fuck world out there.... I always thought Idiocracy was a prophetci movie ... In the land of the blind the one eyed man is king and all that. Mate how many of these people do you thin are out there? Seriously. Its like the gender and identity nut jobs pushing their ideologies. They're a blip in the overall population. But unlike the flat earthers, these nutjobs have wormed and infested government and school campuses, making them far more influential and dangerous. They're the ones you should be fearing, because their claws and tentacles reach far and wide and only growing. Agreed, it is a "blip" now butt it is rapidly growing thats the point.... Dan Andrews just resigned and my phone is going crazy with dildos celebrating like its some kind of win against the "axis of evil" ..... Their numbers growing is an outcome, not a cause. What's the cause? As for Dan Andrews, he be will remembered as the most divisive, disliked if not outright despised politician since Jeff Kennett. He leaves the State in more debt than NSW and QLD combined. He should have stayed to face the electorate. There's multiple reasons which you could dissect for years. But here's one, the internet. Just think before the internet this sick fuck did this shit without an audience. https://www.news.com.au/national/northern-territory/clue-that-brought-down-northern-territory-dog-rapist-adam-robert-corden-britton/news-story/3e64cf64d7d3dc8818bf3e0b73af6ea0Flaying cunce like this alive is too good for them. This is just one example. The answer? Who knows. We can't turn the internet off. WTF did I just read Muz?!?!?!?!!?!? I must really have a sheltered life as I didnt even think this could be a thing, let alone that "thing" having a community of like minded people to share info with ..... bit suss about the "sleuth" who noticed the dog collar details and informed the authorities to get this "thing" busted..... what was that "sleuth's" browsing history like??? yukkkkkkk! Interesting that he is married, an animal welfare worker and had a PhD in Zoology, I wonder if politically he was one of the "Yes" campaigns milieu? After all: "I'm very aware of how highly educated and articulate many of my political activist comrades are though. Not so much the union movement, but the Climate activists are. Heaps are academics." - q
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIm with you. Give them an inch and they will take a mile.
Just like the gay vote. They got the yes and look at them now - you can marry your pet, a table a family member. It’s absolute madness. If you want to end racism, you have to stop treating people differently based on their race. First Nations have been greatly disadvantaged based on outcomes. The Voice is an attempt to close the gap. So rather than federal and state funded health and social housing programs targeted at rectifying the imbalance of some of these "outcomes" you support an ambiguous "voice" to parliament for a very small minority of population, whose purpose is to represent Australian citizens who are somehow different than other Australia citizens because of their race? Or is it their colour, or maybe religion? . The gap between Indigenous folk and others in Aus are profound in education, health, housing and incarceration. The Voice is a mechanism to close the gap. It is not for non-Indigenous Aussies to find solutions and hand them down, but a grass roots First Nations paradigm that Aboriginals have conceived and developing from Indigenous stakeholders on the ground. And for the record, Im not a feeble minded child to have a wobble boarding, door knocking idiot preach to me about what my opinion should be on a particular topic and will take very poorly to being interrupted in my daily life by some numpty trying to convince me one way or another. And as for falling under the spell of Trump advisory marketing companies..... Ill ignore the implied insult. I haven't had an obnoxious householder yet in door knocking carried out in 11 suburbs and towns in Tas. A mate of mine did yesterday though. A few might say not interested and walk away shutting the door firmly. Many people under the age of 50 are keen to learn info about The Voice. People who state they have your attitude to door knockers if they aren't selling something, are rarely rude when presented in person with a door knocker. We attempt to be as polite as possible too. We always thank householders for their time. I've persuaded heaps of vacillating voters to vote Yes. So it is well worth knocking doors to meet people one would rarely meet outside one's echo chambers. Sorry I guess I fundamentally despise the practice of political canvasing in general... I can fend for myself and my views just fine (and to be honest I would be more inclined to give a firm but polite no rather than abuse ...despite my bluster on here)... I see pushing the point on impressionable voters as counter to true democracy and demagoguery of the first order... Trust the populace to make up their own minds and present your point in a coherent way in the media .. people deserve to NOT be pestered. 'people deserve to not be pestered'?! Surely advertising falls into your category? That's just another form of activism.In which case how do you determine what's allowed and what's not. I'm more concerned that politician donations don't have to be disclosed than some door knocker harassing me. The USA of all places have better laws around this than us. Sure, in a way I guess you are right however as Enzo says above it is relatively easy to "disconnect" from it.... If some dude knocked on my door to ask me what brand of laundry powder I use and wanting to explain to me why his company's was better then I would feel exactly the same way... As it stands when a commercial comes on FTA I change channels, or skip on Youtube or ignore on the radio.... Both sides of this campaign have every right to present their argument for or against in the appropriate way. In the newspaper, during a debate, by offering a website or even a "hotline" for people wanting to seek further info to contact. This pushy activism is what I loath... come election time I walk past the volunteers handing out their "how to vote" garbage and sneer with disdain .... at all parties.....
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xNo surprises of the freak shows at the no rally.
Nazis 5G Vaccine mandates digital currency paedo rings
Etc etc
just some of the brilliance on display 😂😂😂
I did laugh at the pictures of the 'No' campaigners. You forgot 'no 15 minute cities' but yeah a real cornucopia of nutjobs there. The usual suspects in abundance. Imagine if you were a 'no' campaigner in good faith and had to mix and talk with those fuckwits. Also the climate hoax gang were there. tbh if you are white, I can’t see why you’d be actively campaigning for ‘No’ - besides the obvious reason.
Fair enough of you want to Vite no, but making a sign and pushing it just makes you look unhinged In fairness mate, some of the wobble board, tin rattlers in the "yes" camp aren't exactly the sort of people I wold want to be in the same room, let alone have a conversation, with. Yeah the hair shirt mob are annoying too but in general they're not 5G annoying. You could play conspiracy bingo with 20 buzzwords on a card and you'd tick them off in 5 minutes flat at any No rally. I usually like in the comments on Facebook that are along the lines of 'have you had your 8th booster yet?' And then something about the gub'ment', Agenda 21, Moderna and Bill Gates. I actually think we probably reached peak average intelligence about 10 to 20 years after the internet became popular. And then vested interests realised you could say anything to anybody with no restrictions at all with predictable consequences.
The rise in flat earth beliefs as an example is just baffling. The movie Idiocracy is becoming more like a documentary every day. I'm on the local weather watch page in my town. Every other day some fucking clown is on there talking about chemtrails and weather engineering and how the gub'ment makes it rain whenever you want. When you ask them why we still have droughts that the government then has to pay out billions in supports it's just crickets or a link to a cloud seeding page somewhere as if that means 'case closed'. And it's not 1 or 2 either, there's dozens of the stupid pricks. Truer words have not been spoken (typed) Its a scary as fuck world out there.... I always thought Idiocracy was a prophetci movie ... In the land of the blind the one eyed man is king and all that. Mate how many of these people do you thin are out there? Seriously. Its like the gender and identity nut jobs pushing their ideologies. They're a blip in the overall population. But unlike the flat earthers, these nutjobs have wormed and infested government and school campuses, making them far more influential and dangerous. They're the ones you should be fearing, because their claws and tentacles reach far and wide and only growing. Agreed, it is a "blip" now butt it is rapidly growing thats the point.... Dan Andrews just resigned and my phone is going crazy with dildos celebrating like its some kind of win against the "axis of evil" ..... Their numbers growing is an outcome, not a cause. What's the cause? As for Dan Andrews, he be will remembered as the most divisive, disliked if not outright despised politician since Jeff Kennett. He leaves the State in more debt than NSW and QLD combined. He should have stayed to face the electorate. There's multiple reasons which you could dissect for years. But here's one, the internet. Just think before the internet this sick fuck did this shit without an audience. https://www.news.com.au/national/northern-territory/clue-that-brought-down-northern-territory-dog-rapist-adam-robert-corden-britton/news-story/3e64cf64d7d3dc8818bf3e0b73af6ea0Flaying cunce like this alive is too good for them. This is just one example. The answer? Who knows. We can't turn the internet off. I'm not gonna lie I didn't open the link after I read the "dog rapist" bit. Just putting it out there, are you in a roundabout way suggesting censoring the internet as a solution to , because that's a whole other can of worms?
|
|
|
localstar
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIm with you. Give them an inch and they will take a mile.
Just like the gay vote. They got the yes and look at them now - you can marry your pet, a table a family member. It’s absolute madness. If you want to end racism, you have to stop treating people differently based on their race. First Nations have been greatly disadvantaged based on outcomes. The Voice is an attempt to close the gap. So rather than federal and state funded health and social housing programs targeted at rectifying the imbalance of some of these "outcomes" you support an ambiguous "voice" to parliament for a very small minority of population, whose purpose is to represent Australian citizens who are somehow different than other Australia citizens because of their race? Or is it their colour, or maybe religion? Everyone wants to help the least fortunate amongst us Decentric (at least those with a heart and conscious do) but Im afraid your referendum will fail simply because we are a progressive society and, mostly, see past the racist garbage of the past.... If the question on the ballot paper was more along the lines of "Do you agree to increase funding on health and housing programs and, crisis centres to combat alcoholism and child abuse issues affecting disadvantaged indigenous people: the answer would have been a resounding YES.... A bunch of doo-gooders telling us that they see "Indegenous Australians" as a different type of Australian is morally reprehensible... Huge NO vote from me. Even though the Noalition has argued the Voice is nebulous and not specific, they use the same tactics the conservatives have over any past plebiscite or referendum. Once The Voice is enshrined in the Constitution, the shape of it can evolve from there. It is simply an advisory body. I was reading in the New Daily yesterday the No campaign has employed an American company who have campaigned a lot for Trump, whose name I can't remember, to devise strategies for the No campaign. In terms of being a progressive society, many of my Indigenous comrades I've met through the Yes 23 Campaign, claim they suffer inadvertent racism all the time - still. There is also supposedly a differential depending on which part of Australia one lives in terms of latent and blatant racism. The fact that you intend do vote No augurs poorly for the Yes campaign succeeding. Given your previous posts over the years, I would have predicted you would vote Yes. It shows that the Trumpian company's tactics is indoctrinating Aussies successfully. My main hope is on the doors, and the Pre- Poll booths, in the last 3 weeks until October 14th. There will be a plethora of Yes volunteers on Pre - Poll booths for the early voters and voters on the day booths. Many won't take up their mind until walking into the booths. Yes 23 has decidedly more volunteers than the likes of Advance Australia and the Noalition. We will have more volunteers trying gto preside voters to vote Yes on the booths. More and more Liberal MPs are supporting Yes. Many volunteers won't door knock, which has a significant impact. I've persuaded heaps of vacillating voters to vote Yes knocking doors. It isn't 'white do-gooders' who've conceived The Voice. Many of us are supporting, and acting on, what over 80% of First Nations want. The First Nations conceived The Voice at the Uluru Statement of the Heart. Sorry Im not sure what the "Noalition" is but i assume some facile bon mot by the illluminated few? I wonder sometimes if political activists EVER live in the real world? As for your presumption of my politics, what would ever make you think I would be comfortable with considering a person more or less Australian in this country because of their race, colour or religion? I have been arguing that very thing over and over and over again on these pages.... Aboriginal Australians, Anglo Australians, Greek Australian etc etc etc are all JUST AUSTRALIANS... BTW You had to speak to an "indigenous comrade" to find out that racism still occurs in Australia in 2023??? There are millions of Aussies from the subcontinent ( thousands of times more than there are indigenous people) who get treated the same way every day, where is their "voice to parliament"? Nor sure what your point is? From the the volume of door knocking, holding stalls, teaching, working out in gyms, socialising in pubs and parties, etc, I meet heaps of regular Aussies. I'm very aware of how highly educated and articulate many of my political activist comrades are though. Not so much the union movement, but the Climate activists are. Heaps are academics. I don't condone racism at all. You don't condone racism? - the belief that different races possess distinct characteristics, abilities, or qualities, especially so as to distinguish them as inferior or superior to one another. Yet are proposing an amendment to the constitution which will benefit ONLY people of one race????? How does that work? How do you "benefit" a race of people without differentiating them based on their ancestry? This is EXACTLY my point.... higher education and articulate political rhetoric doesn't seem to correlate to any form of intelligence sadly. The Political Class- to which Decentric clearly belongs- call ANY act discrimination they approve of as "Affirmative Action". That way they can divide, discriminate, reject basic principles of fairness and justice and actually feel good about themselves doing it. Meanwhile they always seem to be the beneficiaries of all the inequality they are saying they are against: they re born to privileged families, they marry amongst themselves, they attend the best schools, live in the best suburbs, graduate from the best uni's, get the best paying jobs, have access to network with like others. He belongs to a unique class- battle hardened political activists who are also innovative super-coaches.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xNo surprises of the freak shows at the no rally.
Nazis 5G Vaccine mandates digital currency paedo rings
Etc etc
just some of the brilliance on display 😂😂😂
I did laugh at the pictures of the 'No' campaigners. You forgot 'no 15 minute cities' but yeah a real cornucopia of nutjobs there. The usual suspects in abundance. Imagine if you were a 'no' campaigner in good faith and had to mix and talk with those fuckwits. Also the climate hoax gang were there. tbh if you are white, I can’t see why you’d be actively campaigning for ‘No’ - besides the obvious reason.
Fair enough of you want to Vite no, but making a sign and pushing it just makes you look unhinged In fairness mate, some of the wobble board, tin rattlers in the "yes" camp aren't exactly the sort of people I wold want to be in the same room, let alone have a conversation, with. Yeah the hair shirt mob are annoying too but in general they're not 5G annoying. You could play conspiracy bingo with 20 buzzwords on a card and you'd tick them off in 5 minutes flat at any No rally. I usually like in the comments on Facebook that are along the lines of 'have you had your 8th booster yet?' And then something about the gub'ment', Agenda 21, Moderna and Bill Gates. I actually think we probably reached peak average intelligence about 10 to 20 years after the internet became popular. And then vested interests realised you could say anything to anybody with no restrictions at all with predictable consequences.
The rise in flat earth beliefs as an example is just baffling. The movie Idiocracy is becoming more like a documentary every day. I'm on the local weather watch page in my town. Every other day some fucking clown is on there talking about chemtrails and weather engineering and how the gub'ment makes it rain whenever you want. When you ask them why we still have droughts that the government then has to pay out billions in supports it's just crickets or a link to a cloud seeding page somewhere as if that means 'case closed'. And it's not 1 or 2 either, there's dozens of the stupid pricks. Truer words have not been spoken (typed) Its a scary as fuck world out there.... I always thought Idiocracy was a prophetci movie ... In the land of the blind the one eyed man is king and all that. Mate how many of these people do you thin are out there? Seriously. Its like the gender and identity nut jobs pushing their ideologies. They're a blip in the overall population. But unlike the flat earthers, these nutjobs have wormed and infested government and school campuses, making them far more influential and dangerous. They're the ones you should be fearing, because their claws and tentacles reach far and wide and only growing. Agreed, it is a "blip" now butt it is rapidly growing thats the point.... Dan Andrews just resigned and my phone is going crazy with dildos celebrating like its some kind of win against the "axis of evil" ..... Their numbers growing is an outcome, not a cause. What's the cause? As for Dan Andrews, he be will remembered as the most divisive, disliked if not outright despised politician since Jeff Kennett. He leaves the State in more debt than NSW and QLD combined. He should have stayed to face the electorate. There's multiple reasons which you could dissect for years. But here's one, the internet. Just think before the internet this sick fuck did this shit without an audience. https://www.news.com.au/national/northern-territory/clue-that-brought-down-northern-territory-dog-rapist-adam-robert-corden-britton/news-story/3e64cf64d7d3dc8818bf3e0b73af6ea0Flaying cunce like this alive is too good for them. This is just one example. The answer? Who knows. We can't turn the internet off. I'm not gonna lie I didn't open the link after I read the "dog rapist" bit. Just putting it out there, are you in a roundabout way suggesting censoring the internet as a solution to , because that's a whole other can of worms? Dog rapist wasn't the half of it. The sick fuck was torturing dogs in his converted shipping container and uploading it for consumption by other like minded sick fucks. Apparently the descriptions were so graphic during the agreed facts the judge excused security, the sheriffs and any other personnel in the court that didn't need to be there due to possible psychological damage. No. Like I said you can't turn off the internet. It is a problem though. Like I've said many times to my kids and friends. It's the best and worst thing that's happened to the world. My point was back in the day this bloke would be operating in his own closed little world. Now every perversion, no matter how fucked, has an audience. I don't know what the answer is. @mono. You're right about the bloke noticing the collar. My thoughts exactly. Also apparently his wife had no clue.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIm with you. Give them an inch and they will take a mile.
Just like the gay vote. They got the yes and look at them now - you can marry your pet, a table a family member. It’s absolute madness. If you want to end racism, you have to stop treating people differently based on their race. First Nations have been greatly disadvantaged based on outcomes. The Voice is an attempt to close the gap. So rather than federal and state funded health and social housing programs targeted at rectifying the imbalance of some of these "outcomes" you support an ambiguous "voice" to parliament for a very small minority of population, whose purpose is to represent Australian citizens who are somehow different than other Australia citizens because of their race? Or is it their colour, or maybe religion? . The gap between Indigenous folk and others in Aus are profound in education, health, housing and incarceration. The Voice is a mechanism to close the gap. It is not for non-Indigenous Aussies to find solutions and hand them down, but a grass roots First Nations paradigm that Aboriginals have conceived and developing from Indigenous stakeholders on the ground. Excellent, I am all for this, but why does it need to be "enshrined in the Constitution"? And why is the language around what the advisory "powers' that will flow from this arent made clear before we all give our oppinion on whether or not it should go ahead? Also, do we not have a minster for indigenous affairs? What is it that they are mandated to achieve exactly? Why does this "First Nations" paradigm need a constitutional involvement when it is, from what I can understand a mainly health, facilities and education issue? For The Voice to be enshrined in the Constitution means it can't be annulled with a strike of a pen. It can only be annulled with another referendum. Rep bodies have been cancelled before on a number of occasions in previous government tenures. The Voice is a first step. I'll add, "Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good'. The 14 - 18% of the Indigenous population who don't support yes, tend to support a Treaty -which is asking for more. The Voice was conceived by 250 First Nation groups in the Uluru Statement from the Heart. Given so many Aboriginals in the union movement have asked the Aus union moment to assist them is good enough for me. I've done three workshops with both Indigenous union organisers, Lara Watson and Lee Archer. There isn't a current mechanism to access parliament as an Indigenous advisory group. But that again doesnt answer the question of why Decentric. "There isn't a current mechanism to access parliament as an Indigenous advisory group." sure but WHY does there need to be? It formalises the interaction process. There isn't one ATM.
|
|
|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIm with you. Give them an inch and they will take a mile.
Just like the gay vote. They got the yes and look at them now - you can marry your pet, a table a family member. It’s absolute madness. If you want to end racism, you have to stop treating people differently based on their race. First Nations have been greatly disadvantaged based on outcomes. The Voice is an attempt to close the gap. So rather than federal and state funded health and social housing programs targeted at rectifying the imbalance of some of these "outcomes" you support an ambiguous "voice" to parliament for a very small minority of population, whose purpose is to represent Australian citizens who are somehow different than other Australia citizens because of their race? Or is it their colour, or maybe religion? . The gap between Indigenous folk and others in Aus are profound in education, health, housing and incarceration. The Voice is a mechanism to close the gap. It is not for non-Indigenous Aussies to find solutions and hand them down, but a grass roots First Nations paradigm that Aboriginals have conceived and developing from Indigenous stakeholders on the ground. And for the record, Im not a feeble minded child to have a wobble boarding, door knocking idiot preach to me about what my opinion should be on a particular topic and will take very poorly to being interrupted in my daily life by some numpty trying to convince me one way or another. And as for falling under the spell of Trump advisory marketing companies..... Ill ignore the implied insult. I haven't had an obnoxious householder yet in door knocking carried out in 11 suburbs and towns in Tas. A mate of mine did yesterday though. A few might say not interested and walk away shutting the door firmly. Many people under the age of 50 are keen to learn info about The Voice. People who state they have your attitude to door knockers if they aren't selling something, are rarely rude when presented in person with a door knocker. We attempt to be as polite as possible too. We always thank householders for their time. I've persuaded heaps of vacillating voters to vote Yes. So it is well worth knocking doors to meet people one would rarely meet outside one's echo chambers. Sorry I guess I fundamentally despise the practice of political canvasing in general... I can fend for myself and my views just fine (and to be honest I would be more inclined to give a firm but polite no rather than abuse ...despite my bluster on here)... I see pushing the point on impressionable voters as counter to true democracy and demagoguery of the first order... Trust the populace to make up their own minds and present your point in a coherent way in the media .. people deserve to NOT be pestered. Having had vast experience in door knocking, with the The Voice issue many people are pleased to have it explained. Discussion occurring anywhere is part of the democratic process. There are some who subscribe to the notion of door knocking being invasive, but most don't mind. Some even welcome it. The main gripe is most people don't like salespeople trying to sell things. 'Impressionable' voters is a value judgement in your opinion .
|
|
|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIm with you. Give them an inch and they will take a mile.
Just like the gay vote. They got the yes and look at them now - you can marry your pet, a table a family member. It’s absolute madness. If you want to end racism, you have to stop treating people differently based on their race. First Nations have been greatly disadvantaged based on outcomes. The Voice is an attempt to close the gap. So rather than federal and state funded health and social housing programs targeted at rectifying the imbalance of some of these "outcomes" you support an ambiguous "voice" to parliament for a very small minority of population, whose purpose is to represent Australian citizens who are somehow different than other Australia citizens because of their race? Or is it their colour, or maybe religion? . The gap between Indigenous folk and others in Aus are profound in education, health, housing and incarceration. The Voice is a mechanism to close the gap. It is not for non-Indigenous Aussies to find solutions and hand them down, but a grass roots First Nations paradigm that Aboriginals have conceived and developing from Indigenous stakeholders on the ground. Depends who these "others" are. The gap narrows if you look at the lives of non-indigenous in low socio-economic areas in the outskirts of capital cities. If you are middle class, live in the inner capital city, with the best infrastructure, schools, access to healthcare, public transport, and have nice public service job then you can be forgiven for believing every other non-indigenous group has it just as good as you. This is false. We are evaluating entire groups - overall. Of course there are disparities within the constituents of most groups. You're not doing that at all. You're dividing Australia into two groups: Indigenous and The Rest. The problem is that The Rest is made up of a diverse range of groups that may not have anything socio-economic, cultural, geographical and ancestral in common. You're also doing that as someone who belongs to the sub-group that is likely to be the most advantaged overall. Can't see any issue if I'm campaigning for the most disadvantaged, whereas arguably being advantaged myself. Most weeks I'm on a superannuation pension. I'm only affluent when I teach for a day a week or fortnight. Indigenous and The Rest, with due respect, is a simplistic value laden dichotomy.
|
|
|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xNo surprises of the freak shows at the no rally.
Nazis 5G Vaccine mandates digital currency paedo rings
Etc etc
just some of the brilliance on display 😂😂😂
I did laugh at the pictures of the 'No' campaigners. You forgot 'no 15 minute cities' but yeah a real cornucopia of nutjobs there. The usual suspects in abundance. Imagine if you were a 'no' campaigner in good faith and had to mix and talk with those fuckwits. Also the climate hoax gang were there. tbh if you are white, I can’t see why you’d be actively campaigning for ‘No’ - besides the obvious reason.
Fair enough of you want to Vite no, but making a sign and pushing it just makes you look unhinged In fairness mate, some of the wobble board, tin rattlers in the "yes" camp aren't exactly the sort of people I wold want to be in the same room, let alone have a conversation, with. Yeah the hair shirt mob are annoying too but in general they're not 5G annoying. You could play conspiracy bingo with 20 buzzwords on a card and you'd tick them off in 5 minutes flat at any No rally. I usually like in the comments on Facebook that are along the lines of 'have you had your 8th booster yet?' And then something about the gub'ment', Agenda 21, Moderna and Bill Gates. I actually think we probably reached peak average intelligence about 10 to 20 years after the internet became popular. And then vested interests realised you could say anything to anybody with no restrictions at all with predictable consequences.
The rise in flat earth beliefs as an example is just baffling. The movie Idiocracy is becoming more like a documentary every day. I'm on the local weather watch page in my town. Every other day some fucking clown is on there talking about chemtrails and weather engineering and how the gub'ment makes it rain whenever you want. When you ask them why we still have droughts that the government then has to pay out billions in supports it's just crickets or a link to a cloud seeding page somewhere as if that means 'case closed'. And it's not 1 or 2 either, there's dozens of the stupid pricks. Truer words have not been spoken (typed) Its a scary as fuck world out there.... I always thought Idiocracy was a prophetci movie ... In the land of the blind the one eyed man is king and all that. Mate how many of these people do you thin are out there? Seriously. Its like the gender and identity nut jobs pushing their ideologies. They're a blip in the overall population. But unlike the flat earthers, these nutjobs have wormed and infested government and school campuses, making them far more influential and dangerous. They're the ones you should be fearing, because their claws and tentacles reach far and wide and only growing. Agreed, it is a "blip" now butt it is rapidly growing thats the point.... Dan Andrews just resigned and my phone is going crazy with dildos celebrating like its some kind of win against the "axis of evil" ..... Their numbers growing is an outcome, not a cause. What's the cause? As for Dan Andrews, he be will remembered as the most divisive, disliked if not outright despised politician since Jeff Kennett. He leaves the State in more debt than NSW and QLD combined. He should have stayed to face the electorate. Makes one wonder how Dan was constantly re-elected by Victorians if he was so unpopular? He was unpopular in Right wing media outlets like Sky News, Fox and the general Rupert M owned media, because no matter how hard they campaigned to eject him as Victorian Premier, he constantly thwarted them. He is not polarising if decided majorities have kept electing him as Vic premier. A 9 year Premier's tenure is a pretty successful achievement! The Vic ALP only received 37% of the primary votes at the last "Danslide". In other words 2 in 3 people did not have the ALP as their first choice. But because there is no viable opposition in Victoria, the preferential votes went to them. This Editorial in The Age well summarizes Andrews rule: https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/was-it-the-right-time-for-andrews-to-quit-one-issue-provides-the-answer-20230926-p5e7s8.html It is still a landslide with the preferential voting system, relative to other political parties.
|
|
|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIm with you. Give them an inch and they will take a mile.
Just like the gay vote. They got the yes and look at them now - you can marry your pet, a table a family member. It’s absolute madness. If you want to end racism, you have to stop treating people differently based on their race. First Nations have been greatly disadvantaged based on outcomes. The Voice is an attempt to close the gap. So rather than federal and state funded health and social housing programs targeted at rectifying the imbalance of some of these "outcomes" you support an ambiguous "voice" to parliament for a very small minority of population, whose purpose is to represent Australian citizens who are somehow different than other Australia citizens because of their race? Or is it their colour, or maybe religion? Everyone wants to help the least fortunate amongst us Decentric (at least those with a heart and conscious do) but Im afraid your referendum will fail simply because we are a progressive society and, mostly, see past the racist garbage of the past.... If the question on the ballot paper was more along the lines of "Do you agree to increase funding on health and housing programs and, crisis centres to combat alcoholism and child abuse issues affecting disadvantaged indigenous people: the answer would have been a resounding YES.... A bunch of doo-gooders telling us that they see "Indegenous Australians" as a different type of Australian is morally reprehensible... Huge NO vote from me. Even though the Noalition has argued the Voice is nebulous and not specific, they use the same tactics the conservatives have over any past plebiscite or referendum. Once The Voice is enshrined in the Constitution, the shape of it can evolve from there. It is simply an advisory body. I was reading in the New Daily yesterday the No campaign has employed an American company who have campaigned a lot for Trump, whose name I can't remember, to devise strategies for the No campaign. In terms of being a progressive society, many of my Indigenous comrades I've met through the Yes 23 Campaign, claim they suffer inadvertent racism all the time - still. There is also supposedly a differential depending on which part of Australia one lives in terms of latent and blatant racism. The fact that you intend do vote No augurs poorly for the Yes campaign succeeding. Given your previous posts over the years, I would have predicted you would vote Yes. It shows that the Trumpian company's tactics is indoctrinating Aussies successfully. My main hope is on the doors, and the Pre- Poll booths, in the last 3 weeks until October 14th. There will be a plethora of Yes volunteers on Pre - Poll booths for the early voters and voters on the day booths. Many won't take up their mind until walking into the booths. Yes 23 has decidedly more volunteers than the likes of Advance Australia and the Noalition. We will have more volunteers trying gto preside voters to vote Yes on the booths. More and more Liberal MPs are supporting Yes. Many volunteers won't door knock, which has a significant impact. I've persuaded heaps of vacillating voters to vote Yes knocking doors. It isn't 'white do-gooders' who've conceived The Voice. Many of us are supporting, and acting on, what over 80% of First Nations want. The First Nations conceived The Voice at the Uluru Statement of the Heart. Sorry Im not sure what the "Noalition" is but i assume some facile bon mot by the illluminated few? I wonder sometimes if political activists EVER live in the real world? As for your presumption of my politics, what would ever make you think I would be comfortable with considering a person more or less Australian in this country because of their race, colour or religion? I have been arguing that very thing over and over and over again on these pages.... Aboriginal Australians, Anglo Australians, Greek Australian etc etc etc are all JUST AUSTRALIANS... BTW You had to speak to an "indigenous comrade" to find out that racism still occurs in Australia in 2023??? There are millions of Aussies from the subcontinent ( thousands of times more than there are indigenous people) who get treated the same way every day, where is their "voice to parliament"? Nor sure what your point is? From the the volume of door knocking, holding stalls, teaching, working out in gyms, socialising in pubs and parties, etc, I meet heaps of regular Aussies. I'm very aware of how highly educated and articulate many of my political activist comrades are though. Not so much the union movement, but the Climate activists are. Heaps are academics. I don't condone racism at all. You don't condone racism? - the belief that different races possess distinct characteristics, abilities, or qualities, especially so as to distinguish them as inferior or superior to one another. Yet are proposing an amendment to the constitution which will benefit ONLY people of one race????? How does that work? How do you "benefit" a race of people without differentiating them based on their ancestry? This is EXACTLY my point.... higher education and articulate political rhetoric doesn't seem to correlate to any form of intelligence sadly. The Political Class- to which Decentric clearly belongs- call ANY act discrimination they approve of as "Affirmative Action". That way they can divide, discriminate, reject basic principles of fairness and justice and actually feel good about themselves doing it. Meanwhile they always seem to be the beneficiaries of all the inequality they are saying they are against: they re born to privileged families, they marry amongst themselves, they attend the best schools, live in the best suburbs, graduate from the best uni's, get the best paying jobs, have access to network with like others. Some big assumptions about me, EB. I always attended government schools. I like notions of egalitarianism. I want to see the disadvantaged, like many in First Nations, improve their quality of life.
|
|
|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIm with you. Give them an inch and they will take a mile.
Just like the gay vote. They got the yes and look at them now - you can marry your pet, a table a family member. It’s absolute madness. If you want to end racism, you have to stop treating people differently based on their race. First Nations have been greatly disadvantaged based on outcomes. The Voice is an attempt to close the gap. So rather than federal and state funded health and social housing programs targeted at rectifying the imbalance of some of these "outcomes" you support an ambiguous "voice" to parliament for a very small minority of population, whose purpose is to represent Australian citizens who are somehow different than other Australia citizens because of their race? Or is it their colour, or maybe religion? . The gap between Indigenous folk and others in Aus are profound in education, health, housing and incarceration. The Voice is a mechanism to close the gap. It is not for non-Indigenous Aussies to find solutions and hand them down, but a grass roots First Nations paradigm that Aboriginals have conceived and developing from Indigenous stakeholders on the ground. And for the record, Im not a feeble minded child to have a wobble boarding, door knocking idiot preach to me about what my opinion should be on a particular topic and will take very poorly to being interrupted in my daily life by some numpty trying to convince me one way or another. And as for falling under the spell of Trump advisory marketing companies..... Ill ignore the implied insult. I haven't had an obnoxious householder yet in door knocking carried out in 11 suburbs and towns in Tas. A mate of mine did yesterday though. A few might say not interested and walk away shutting the door firmly. Many people under the age of 50 are keen to learn info about The Voice. People who state they have your attitude to door knockers if they aren't selling something, are rarely rude when presented in person with a door knocker. We attempt to be as polite as possible too. We always thank householders for their time. I've persuaded heaps of vacillating voters to vote Yes. So it is well worth knocking doors to meet people one would rarely meet outside one's echo chambers. Sorry I guess I fundamentally despise the practice of political canvasing in general... I can fend for myself and my views just fine (and to be honest I would be more inclined to give a firm but polite no rather than abuse ...despite my bluster on here)... I see pushing the point on impressionable voters as counter to true democracy and demagoguery of the first order... Trust the populace to make up their own minds and present your point in a coherent way in the media .. people deserve to NOT be pestered. 'people deserve to not be pestered'?! Surely advertising falls into your category? That's just another form of activism. In which case how do you determine what's allowed and what's not. I'm more concerned that politician donations don't have to be disclosed than some door knocker harassing me. The USA of all places have better laws around this than us. Advertisers use media like TV, radio, email, physical pamphlet delivered to your letter box. These are easily avoided with no confrontation. Door-knockers OTOH are physically on your premises, in your face and taking up your time. You have to physically confront them. +x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIm with you. Give them an inch and they will take a mile.
Just like the gay vote. They got the yes and look at them now - you can marry your pet, a table a family member. It’s absolute madness. If you want to end racism, you have to stop treating people differently based on their race. First Nations have been greatly disadvantaged based on outcomes. The Voice is an attempt to close the gap. So rather than federal and state funded health and social housing programs targeted at rectifying the imbalance of some of these "outcomes" you support an ambiguous "voice" to parliament for a very small minority of population, whose purpose is to represent Australian citizens who are somehow different than other Australia citizens because of their race? Or is it their colour, or maybe religion? Everyone wants to help the least fortunate amongst us Decentric (at least those with a heart and conscious do) but Im afraid your referendum will fail simply because we are a progressive society and, mostly, see past the racist garbage of the past.... If the question on the ballot paper was more along the lines of "Do you agree to increase funding on health and housing programs and, crisis centres to combat alcoholism and child abuse issues affecting disadvantaged indigenous people: the answer would have been a resounding YES.... A bunch of doo-gooders telling us that they see "Indegenous Australians" as a different type of Australian is morally reprehensible... Huge NO vote from me. Even though the Noalition has argued the Voice is nebulous and not specific, they use the same tactics the conservatives have over any past plebiscite or referendum. Once The Voice is enshrined in the Constitution, the shape of it can evolve from there. It is simply an advisory body. I was reading in the New Daily yesterday the No campaign has employed an American company who have campaigned a lot for Trump, whose name I can't remember, to devise strategies for the No campaign. In terms of being a progressive society, many of my Indigenous comrades I've met through the Yes 23 Campaign, claim they suffer inadvertent racism all the time - still. There is also supposedly a differential depending on which part of Australia one lives in terms of latent and blatant racism. The fact that you intend do vote No augurs poorly for the Yes campaign succeeding. Given your previous posts over the years, I would have predicted you would vote Yes. It shows that the Trumpian company's tactics is indoctrinating Aussies successfully. My main hope is on the doors, and the Pre- Poll booths, in the last 3 weeks until October 14th. There will be a plethora of Yes volunteers on Pre - Poll booths for the early voters and voters on the day booths. Many won't take up their mind until walking into the booths. Yes 23 has decidedly more volunteers than the likes of Advance Australia and the Noalition. We will have more volunteers trying gto preside voters to vote Yes on the booths. More and more Liberal MPs are supporting Yes. Many volunteers won't door knock, which has a significant impact. I've persuaded heaps of vacillating voters to vote Yes knocking doors. It isn't 'white do-gooders' who've conceived The Voice. Many of us are supporting, and acting on, what over 80% of First Nations want. The First Nations conceived The Voice at the Uluru Statement of the Heart. Sorry Im not sure what the "Noalition" is but i assume some facile bon mot by the illluminated few? I wonder sometimes if political activists EVER live in the real world? As for your presumption of my politics, what would ever make you think I would be comfortable with considering a person more or less Australian in this country because of their race, colour or religion? I have been arguing that very thing over and over and over again on these pages.... Aboriginal Australians, Anglo Australians, Greek Australian etc etc etc are all JUST AUSTRALIANS... BTW You had to speak to an "indigenous comrade" to find out that racism still occurs in Australia in 2023??? There are millions of Aussies from the subcontinent ( thousands of times more than there are indigenous people) who get treated the same way every day, where is their "voice to parliament"? Nor sure what your point is? From the the volume of door knocking, holding stalls, teaching, working out in gyms, socialising in pubs and parties, etc, I meet heaps of regular Aussies. I'm very aware of how highly educated and articulate many of my political activist comrades are though. Not so much the union movement, but the Climate activists are. Heaps are academics. I don't condone racism at all. You don't condone racism? - the belief that different races possess distinct characteristics, abilities, or qualities, especially so as to distinguish them as inferior or superior to one another. Yet are proposing an amendment to the constitution which will benefit ONLY people of one race????? How does that work? How do you "benefit" a race of people without differentiating them based on their ancestry? This is EXACTLY my point.... higher education and articulate political rhetoric doesn't seem to correlate to any form of intelligence sadly. Racism tends to denigrate the disadvantaged. For the last sentence what do you define as intelligence? Emotional? Social? Cognitive?
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xNo surprises of the freak shows at the no rally.
Nazis 5G Vaccine mandates digital currency paedo rings
Etc etc
just some of the brilliance on display 😂😂😂
I did laugh at the pictures of the 'No' campaigners. You forgot 'no 15 minute cities' but yeah a real cornucopia of nutjobs there. The usual suspects in abundance. Imagine if you were a 'no' campaigner in good faith and had to mix and talk with those fuckwits. Also the climate hoax gang were there. tbh if you are white, I can’t see why you’d be actively campaigning for ‘No’ - besides the obvious reason.
Fair enough of you want to Vite no, but making a sign and pushing it just makes you look unhinged In fairness mate, some of the wobble board, tin rattlers in the "yes" camp aren't exactly the sort of people I wold want to be in the same room, let alone have a conversation, with. Yeah the hair shirt mob are annoying too but in general they're not 5G annoying. You could play conspiracy bingo with 20 buzzwords on a card and you'd tick them off in 5 minutes flat at any No rally. I usually like in the comments on Facebook that are along the lines of 'have you had your 8th booster yet?' And then something about the gub'ment', Agenda 21, Moderna and Bill Gates. I actually think we probably reached peak average intelligence about 10 to 20 years after the internet became popular. And then vested interests realised you could say anything to anybody with no restrictions at all with predictable consequences.
The rise in flat earth beliefs as an example is just baffling. The movie Idiocracy is becoming more like a documentary every day. I'm on the local weather watch page in my town. Every other day some fucking clown is on there talking about chemtrails and weather engineering and how the gub'ment makes it rain whenever you want. When you ask them why we still have droughts that the government then has to pay out billions in supports it's just crickets or a link to a cloud seeding page somewhere as if that means 'case closed'. And it's not 1 or 2 either, there's dozens of the stupid pricks. Truer words have not been spoken (typed) Its a scary as fuck world out there.... I always thought Idiocracy was a prophetci movie ... In the land of the blind the one eyed man is king and all that. Mate how many of these people do you thin are out there? Seriously. Its like the gender and identity nut jobs pushing their ideologies. They're a blip in the overall population. But unlike the flat earthers, these nutjobs have wormed and infested government and school campuses, making them far more influential and dangerous. They're the ones you should be fearing, because their claws and tentacles reach far and wide and only growing. Agreed, it is a "blip" now butt it is rapidly growing thats the point.... Dan Andrews just resigned and my phone is going crazy with dildos celebrating like its some kind of win against the "axis of evil" ..... Their numbers growing is an outcome, not a cause. What's the cause? As for Dan Andrews, he be will remembered as the most divisive, disliked if not outright despised politician since Jeff Kennett. He leaves the State in more debt than NSW and QLD combined. He should have stayed to face the electorate. Makes one wonder how Dan was constantly re-elected by Victorians if he was so unpopular? He was unpopular in Right wing media outlets like Sky News, Fox and the general Rupert M owned media, because no matter how hard they campaigned to eject him as Victorian Premier, he constantly thwarted them. He is not polarising if decided majorities have kept electing him as Vic premier. A 9 year Premier's tenure is a pretty successful achievement! The Vic ALP only received 37% of the primary votes at the last "Danslide". In other words 2 in 3 people did not have the ALP as their first choice. But because there is no viable opposition in Victoria, the preferential votes went to them. This Editorial in The Age well summarizes Andrews rule: https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/was-it-the-right-time-for-andrews-to-quit-one-issue-provides-the-answer-20230926-p5e7s8.html It is still a landslide with the preferential voting system, relative to other political parties. Yes as I said its because there is no effective opposition in the State, not that people WANTED the ALP and Dan. Now that might not bother you because its you team that is in power. But if you read that article and you really care about democracy anf good government, it should bother you.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIm with you. Give them an inch and they will take a mile.
Just like the gay vote. They got the yes and look at them now - you can marry your pet, a table a family member. It’s absolute madness. If you want to end racism, you have to stop treating people differently based on their race. First Nations have been greatly disadvantaged based on outcomes. The Voice is an attempt to close the gap. So rather than federal and state funded health and social housing programs targeted at rectifying the imbalance of some of these "outcomes" you support an ambiguous "voice" to parliament for a very small minority of population, whose purpose is to represent Australian citizens who are somehow different than other Australia citizens because of their race? Or is it their colour, or maybe religion? Everyone wants to help the least fortunate amongst us Decentric (at least those with a heart and conscious do) but Im afraid your referendum will fail simply because we are a progressive society and, mostly, see past the racist garbage of the past.... If the question on the ballot paper was more along the lines of "Do you agree to increase funding on health and housing programs and, crisis centres to combat alcoholism and child abuse issues affecting disadvantaged indigenous people: the answer would have been a resounding YES.... A bunch of doo-gooders telling us that they see "Indegenous Australians" as a different type of Australian is morally reprehensible... Huge NO vote from me. Even though the Noalition has argued the Voice is nebulous and not specific, they use the same tactics the conservatives have over any past plebiscite or referendum. Once The Voice is enshrined in the Constitution, the shape of it can evolve from there. It is simply an advisory body. I was reading in the New Daily yesterday the No campaign has employed an American company who have campaigned a lot for Trump, whose name I can't remember, to devise strategies for the No campaign. In terms of being a progressive society, many of my Indigenous comrades I've met through the Yes 23 Campaign, claim they suffer inadvertent racism all the time - still. There is also supposedly a differential depending on which part of Australia one lives in terms of latent and blatant racism. The fact that you intend do vote No augurs poorly for the Yes campaign succeeding. Given your previous posts over the years, I would have predicted you would vote Yes. It shows that the Trumpian company's tactics is indoctrinating Aussies successfully. My main hope is on the doors, and the Pre- Poll booths, in the last 3 weeks until October 14th. There will be a plethora of Yes volunteers on Pre - Poll booths for the early voters and voters on the day booths. Many won't take up their mind until walking into the booths. Yes 23 has decidedly more volunteers than the likes of Advance Australia and the Noalition. We will have more volunteers trying gto preside voters to vote Yes on the booths. More and more Liberal MPs are supporting Yes. Many volunteers won't door knock, which has a significant impact. I've persuaded heaps of vacillating voters to vote Yes knocking doors. It isn't 'white do-gooders' who've conceived The Voice. Many of us are supporting, and acting on, what over 80% of First Nations want. The First Nations conceived The Voice at the Uluru Statement of the Heart. Sorry Im not sure what the "Noalition" is but i assume some facile bon mot by the illluminated few? I wonder sometimes if political activists EVER live in the real world? As for your presumption of my politics, what would ever make you think I would be comfortable with considering a person more or less Australian in this country because of their race, colour or religion? I have been arguing that very thing over and over and over again on these pages.... Aboriginal Australians, Anglo Australians, Greek Australian etc etc etc are all JUST AUSTRALIANS... BTW You had to speak to an "indigenous comrade" to find out that racism still occurs in Australia in 2023??? There are millions of Aussies from the subcontinent ( thousands of times more than there are indigenous people) who get treated the same way every day, where is their "voice to parliament"? Nor sure what your point is? From the the volume of door knocking, holding stalls, teaching, working out in gyms, socialising in pubs and parties, etc, I meet heaps of regular Aussies. I'm very aware of how highly educated and articulate many of my political activist comrades are though. Not so much the union movement, but the Climate activists are. Heaps are academics. I don't condone racism at all. You don't condone racism? - the belief that different races possess distinct characteristics, abilities, or qualities, especially so as to distinguish them as inferior or superior to one another. Yet are proposing an amendment to the constitution which will benefit ONLY people of one race????? How does that work? How do you "benefit" a race of people without differentiating them based on their ancestry? This is EXACTLY my point.... higher education and articulate political rhetoric doesn't seem to correlate to any form of intelligence sadly. The Political Class- to which Decentric clearly belongs- call ANY act discrimination they approve of as "Affirmative Action". That way they can divide, discriminate, reject basic principles of fairness and justice and actually feel good about themselves doing it. Meanwhile they always seem to be the beneficiaries of all the inequality they are saying they are against: they re born to privileged families, they marry amongst themselves, they attend the best schools, live in the best suburbs, graduate from the best uni's, get the best paying jobs, have access to network with like others. Some big assumptions about me, EB. I always attended government schools. I like notions of egalitarianism. I want to see the disadvantaged, like many in First Nations, improve their quality of life. Very few people don't want that. The Voice comes down to money and property, ie how much and what sort indigenous people get, and the level of control they will have over how its spent on them. Its hard to believe that around $7+billion dollars of indigenous-specific spending is occurring every year, and those people not having any say in how it was spent, . Maybe this is was the problem: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-06-06/indigenous-organisations-investigated-allegations-fraud/7476570BTW in the years between 2005 and 2015, life expectancy for indigenous males increased by 4.4 years, and non-indigenous males by 1.5. Yes, there is still a gap, but it is closing.
|
|
|
johnsmith
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
For those who think that "The Voice" is just a way to help Aborigines - this video is frightening at the level of anger activism that is driving this ... Reparations, Communist Party. It only takes 90 seconds to view this YouTube video. Please.As an immigrant to this nation, I do not want to see this happen to Australia. https://youtu.be/655mzGRmkZw?
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
It’s pretty weird coincidence how no racists are voting yes 😂
or every racist is voting no 🤔
(and for those who cannot read, that is not saying that everyone who is voting no racist)
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Weird thing is, if you want to vote NO you have to align yourself with rocket scientists like Hanson, Malcolm Roberts, Latham, Spud Dutton, most of Sky News and Murdoch as well as just about every cooker in Australia. And John Smith. Think I'd vote informal before feeling that icky.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xNo surprises of the freak shows at the no rally.
Nazis 5G Vaccine mandates digital currency paedo rings
Etc etc
just some of the brilliance on display 😂😂😂
I did laugh at the pictures of the 'No' campaigners. You forgot 'no 15 minute cities' but yeah a real cornucopia of nutjobs there. The usual suspects in abundance. Imagine if you were a 'no' campaigner in good faith and had to mix and talk with those fuckwits. Also the climate hoax gang were there. tbh if you are white, I can’t see why you’d be actively campaigning for ‘No’ - besides the obvious reason.
Fair enough of you want to Vite no, but making a sign and pushing it just makes you look unhinged In fairness mate, some of the wobble board, tin rattlers in the "yes" camp aren't exactly the sort of people I wold want to be in the same room, let alone have a conversation, with. Yeah the hair shirt mob are annoying too but in general they're not 5G annoying. You could play conspiracy bingo with 20 buzzwords on a card and you'd tick them off in 5 minutes flat at any No rally. I usually like in the comments on Facebook that are along the lines of 'have you had your 8th booster yet?' And then something about the gub'ment', Agenda 21, Moderna and Bill Gates. I actually think we probably reached peak average intelligence about 10 to 20 years after the internet became popular. And then vested interests realised you could say anything to anybody with no restrictions at all with predictable consequences.
The rise in flat earth beliefs as an example is just baffling. The movie Idiocracy is becoming more like a documentary every day. I'm on the local weather watch page in my town. Every other day some fucking clown is on there talking about chemtrails and weather engineering and how the gub'ment makes it rain whenever you want. When you ask them why we still have droughts that the government then has to pay out billions in supports it's just crickets or a link to a cloud seeding page somewhere as if that means 'case closed'. And it's not 1 or 2 either, there's dozens of the stupid pricks. Truer words have not been spoken (typed) Its a scary as fuck world out there.... I always thought Idiocracy was a prophetci movie ... In the land of the blind the one eyed man is king and all that. Mate how many of these people do you thin are out there? Seriously. Its like the gender and identity nut jobs pushing their ideologies. They're a blip in the overall population. But unlike the flat earthers, these nutjobs have wormed and infested government and school campuses, making them far more influential and dangerous. They're the ones you should be fearing, because their claws and tentacles reach far and wide and only growing. Agreed, it is a "blip" now butt it is rapidly growing thats the point.... Dan Andrews just resigned and my phone is going crazy with dildos celebrating like its some kind of win against the "axis of evil" ..... Their numbers growing is an outcome, not a cause. What's the cause? As for Dan Andrews, he be will remembered as the most divisive, disliked if not outright despised politician since Jeff Kennett. He leaves the State in more debt than NSW and QLD combined. He should have stayed to face the electorate. Makes one wonder how Dan was constantly re-elected by Victorians if he was so unpopular? He was unpopular in Right wing media outlets like Sky News, Fox and the general Rupert M owned media, because no matter how hard they campaigned to eject him as Victorian Premier, he constantly thwarted them. He is not polarising if decided majorities have kept electing him as Vic premier. A 9 year Premier's tenure is a pretty successful achievement! The Vic ALP only received 37% of the primary votes at the last "Danslide". In other words 2 in 3 people did not have the ALP as their first choice. But because there is no viable opposition in Victoria, the preferential votes went to them. This Editorial in The Age well summarizes Andrews rule: https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/was-it-the-right-time-for-andrews-to-quit-one-issue-provides-the-answer-20230926-p5e7s8.html It is still a landslide with the preferential voting system, relative to other political parties. Yes as I said its because there is no effective opposition in the State, not that people WANTED the ALP and Dan. Now that might not bother you because its you team that is in power. But if you read that article and you really care about democracy anf good government, it should bother you. This is a weird statement. "not that the people WANTED the ALP and Dan'. How do you know that? Did you interview everyone? Does this discount their increased majority from the election? Does this apply to every election where 'your' side doesn't win? Can I use this when Albo gets ousted?
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWeird thing is, if you want to vote NO you have to align yourself with rocket scientists like Hanson, Malcolm Roberts, Latham, Spud Dutton, most of Sky News and Murdoch as well as just about every cooker in Australia. And John Smith. Think I'd vote informal before feeling that icky. Just vote your conscious Muz, no need to align yourself with anyone or anything.... Your enemy's enemy doesn't always have to be your friend mate....
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+xIt’s pretty weird coincidence how no racists are voting yes 😂 or every racist is voting no 🤔 (and for those who cannot read, that is not saying that everyone who is voting no racist) Hahahah I agree, its the "People's Front of Judea vs the "Judean People's Front" all over again.....
|
|
|
Decentric 2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWeird thing is, if you want to vote NO you have to align yourself with rocket scientists like Hanson, Malcolm Roberts, Latham, Spud Dutton, most of Sky News and Murdoch as well as just about every cooker in Australia. And John Smith. Think I'd vote informal before feeling that icky. Don't forget to mention these right wingers supporting No too. John Howard. Andrew Bolt. Gina Reinhardt. Peta Credlin. Tony Abbott. Rupert Murdoch ( if he can still vote in Aus?). Clive Palmer. Added to your illustrious group of arch conservatives, it starts to depict a trend of who is advocating No. The Institute of Public Affairs, a right wing think tank, is a big backer of No too.
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xNo surprises of the freak shows at the no rally.
Nazis 5G Vaccine mandates digital currency paedo rings
Etc etc
just some of the brilliance on display 😂😂😂
I did laugh at the pictures of the 'No' campaigners. You forgot 'no 15 minute cities' but yeah a real cornucopia of nutjobs there. The usual suspects in abundance. Imagine if you were a 'no' campaigner in good faith and had to mix and talk with those fuckwits. Also the climate hoax gang were there. tbh if you are white, I can’t see why you’d be actively campaigning for ‘No’ - besides the obvious reason.
Fair enough of you want to Vite no, but making a sign and pushing it just makes you look unhinged In fairness mate, some of the wobble board, tin rattlers in the "yes" camp aren't exactly the sort of people I wold want to be in the same room, let alone have a conversation, with. Yeah the hair shirt mob are annoying too but in general they're not 5G annoying. You could play conspiracy bingo with 20 buzzwords on a card and you'd tick them off in 5 minutes flat at any No rally. I usually like in the comments on Facebook that are along the lines of 'have you had your 8th booster yet?' And then something about the gub'ment', Agenda 21, Moderna and Bill Gates. I actually think we probably reached peak average intelligence about 10 to 20 years after the internet became popular. And then vested interests realised you could say anything to anybody with no restrictions at all with predictable consequences.
The rise in flat earth beliefs as an example is just baffling. The movie Idiocracy is becoming more like a documentary every day. I'm on the local weather watch page in my town. Every other day some fucking clown is on there talking about chemtrails and weather engineering and how the gub'ment makes it rain whenever you want. When you ask them why we still have droughts that the government then has to pay out billions in supports it's just crickets or a link to a cloud seeding page somewhere as if that means 'case closed'. And it's not 1 or 2 either, there's dozens of the stupid pricks. Truer words have not been spoken (typed) Its a scary as fuck world out there.... I always thought Idiocracy was a prophetci movie ... In the land of the blind the one eyed man is king and all that. Mate how many of these people do you thin are out there? Seriously. Its like the gender and identity nut jobs pushing their ideologies. They're a blip in the overall population. But unlike the flat earthers, these nutjobs have wormed and infested government and school campuses, making them far more influential and dangerous. They're the ones you should be fearing, because their claws and tentacles reach far and wide and only growing. Agreed, it is a "blip" now butt it is rapidly growing thats the point.... Dan Andrews just resigned and my phone is going crazy with dildos celebrating like its some kind of win against the "axis of evil" ..... Their numbers growing is an outcome, not a cause. What's the cause? As for Dan Andrews, he be will remembered as the most divisive, disliked if not outright despised politician since Jeff Kennett. He leaves the State in more debt than NSW and QLD combined. He should have stayed to face the electorate. Makes one wonder how Dan was constantly re-elected by Victorians if he was so unpopular? He was unpopular in Right wing media outlets like Sky News, Fox and the general Rupert M owned media, because no matter how hard they campaigned to eject him as Victorian Premier, he constantly thwarted them. He is not polarising if decided majorities have kept electing him as Vic premier. A 9 year Premier's tenure is a pretty successful achievement! The Vic ALP only received 37% of the primary votes at the last "Danslide". In other words 2 in 3 people did not have the ALP as their first choice. But because there is no viable opposition in Victoria, the preferential votes went to them. This Editorial in The Age well summarizes Andrews rule: https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/was-it-the-right-time-for-andrews-to-quit-one-issue-provides-the-answer-20230926-p5e7s8.html It is still a landslide with the preferential voting system, relative to other political parties. Yes as I said its because there is no effective opposition in the State, not that people WANTED the ALP and Dan. Now that might not bother you because its you team that is in power. But if you read that article and you really care about democracy anf good government, it should bother you. This is a weird statement. "not that the people WANTED the ALP and Dan'. How do you know that? Did you interview everyone? Does this discount their increased majority from the election? Does this apply to every election where 'your' side doesn't win? Can I use this when Albo gets ousted? I know that because Labors primary vote reduced and I know that Labors 2- party preferred vote reduced. The outcome was 2 in 3 Victorians didn't vote Labor as their first choice. They were forced to nominate them otherwise the vote is invalid. The preferential voting system is perverted. In a true democracy optional preferential voting is what we would have, including the right not to cast a vote. Yes. And Yes. [edit] Just to add, Labor had just 2% more votes - just 80,000 votes over the Libs, and ended up with 56 seats versus 28.
|
|
|