|
bohemia
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
I've seen refs close to getting bashed for deflecting breaks like that :D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CharlieYankos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 289,
Visits: 0
|
+xI've seen refs close to getting bashed for deflecting breaks like that :D jeez that is a great through ball by Fowler.. Foord also did very well
|
|
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Scenes! Wonderful play. Great to see a player get the ball and then go to the goal and not hold up and wait to cross. Back yourself and have a crack.
|
|
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI've seen refs close to getting bashed for deflecting breaks like that :D Was in the absolute death strip that run.
|
|
|
|
|
bohemia
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Ref having an absolute mare missing that corner deflection from Foord
|
|
|
|
|
dirk vanadidas
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+xRef having an absolute mare missing that corner deflection from Foord Also gorry has ring on finger
Europe is funding the war not Chelsea football club
|
|
|
|
|
Davstar
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9K,
Visits: 0
|
we're looking good in the 1st half - Some absolute fantastic link up play
these Kangaroos can play football - Ange P. (Intercontinental WC Play-offs 2017)
KEEP POLITICS OUT OF FOOTBALL
|
|
|
|
|
bohemia
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xwe're looking good in the 1st half - Some absolute fantastic link up play We're the better team so far but not by much
|
|
|
|
|
PGR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 683,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xwe're looking good in the 1st half - Some absolute fantastic link up play We're the better team so far but not by much Reading the live streams asserts it was Denmark in control first half hour
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
thought Denmark had some good chances in the first 15 minutes and we looked in trouble, but we fought our way into our match and took the lead
|
|
|
|
|
Melbcityguy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
Bring it home ladies
|
|
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Some unnecessary shit going on. Passing it to the marker rather than space. Arnold and her gather just there. Geez! We're starting to beg. Need to own the next 15 and score.
|
|
|
|
|
bohemia
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xwe're looking good in the 1st half - Some absolute fantastic link up play We're the better team so far but not by much Reading the live streams asserts it was Denmark in control first half hour They're killing the stats but I think we've had them covered on their breaks and we've had more than our share of killer passes to open them up
|
|
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Oh ffs. Safety first by Gorry that's OK but not one player runs to the wing. Then Cately just belts it out when Foord and Fowler are in space.
|
|
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Van Egmond should be made to play between the mid and defence and the 2 6's can move a bit higher. Way too much space for Harder between each time.
|
|
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Cooney Cross has had some good corners of late. Listen to Basheer and linger at the back post.
|
|
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Get Chidiac on for Van Egmond I reckon. Don't necessarily need a second goal but the runs and movement will create space and have Denmark have to overstretch. Some woeful first tough at times. Got to be firm.
|
|
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Foord imitating Juric vs South Korea there.
|
|
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Kerr getting warm!
|
|
|
|
|
Aljay
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.2K,
Visits: 0
|
This game has another goal in it, Tony better not park the bus. Fiord’s defender on a yellow, give it to her all night long.
|
|
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Nicely worked. Feel much better now.
Hope Tony can manage his squad better here while managing the game too. Some players will have energy to burn.
|
|
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThis game has another goal in it, Tony better not park the bus. Fiord’s defender on a yellow, give it to her all night long. Now we're 2:0 up and our bench is abled, have Vine or someone run at her. Really got to stay switched on now.
|
|
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Kerr slipping and creating that divot was scary.
|
|
|
|
|
PGR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 683,
Visits: 0
|
+xKerr slipping and creating that divot was scary. Always a gamble whether to save her for next game or risk her now, even if only for a short while. Does she look OK?
|
|
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Foord an absolute beast tonight. What a workhorse!
|
|
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xKerr slipping and creating that divot was scary. Always a gamble whether to save her for next game or risk her now, even if a short wile. Does she look OK? Was back up fine. More Physio and consider for next game. Tbh I'd stay with the line up. Maybe start Chidiac over Van Egmond and go for early goal.
|
|
|
|
|
Sanga
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 208,
Visits: 0
|
Do not understand what the coach is doing with the subs. Agreed that Foord was awesome tonight
|
|
|
|
|
Keeper66
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+xDo not understand what the coach is doing with the subs. Agreed that Foord was awesome tonight I believe Gustavsson is terrible at game management when trying to close out a game. Makes too few subs and generally too late. Also the Matilda's often look dodgy when he goes to 5 at the back, which Gustavsson often does to protect a lead.
|
|
|
|
|
Hillbilly55
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 564,
Visits: 0
|
POTM was Van Egmond for me. Held up play, got involved, created space for the fast wingers. Set up the second goal. Unpopular opinion, but there you go :)
|
|
|
|
|
localstar
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xI've been harping on about Tony G's formations and game plans not being a contemporary Aus paradigm. I've just read that in possession stats, the Matildas have really low possession (I can't verify territory) compared to the higher ranked teams they've played. Spain 30% England 30% France 45% Canada circa 40%. Some of this might be a % or two out. Can't find the original article where it appeared. Usually when teams have such a low percentage of possession, the team has to run heaps more than the team with higher % of possession. Hence, it is a lot more tiring to chase the ball than possess it. Under most current Aussie coaches, using the formations I've seen with previous Matildas and Socceroos, plus ALM and ALW coaches, the Matildas would surely have had more control of games? Tony G has set them up quite differently. in the last world cup and last champions league possession has started to become anti correlated with results these days I think a better rule of thumb is passes and dribbles completed per minute in possession. Obviously not a perfect stat (no stat is apart from goals) but does differentiate your hoof ball teams from ones playing high risk passes through the lines and it does seem that the higher a quality a competition, the higher this number is During the 2012 National Football Aus Conferences for coaches, there was exhaustive data presented by the Football Aus Tech Dept. One poignant stat was how much more running in games teams did who had proportionally less ball. Notwithstanding, your recent Champ League data, a national style was formulated like successful proactive UEFA countries, to have more control over games and do less running. There is also massive concentration required when the other team has the ball. The joker in the pack has been Italy. They often have less possession than their opponents, but still appear able to fashion as many, or more shots on goal, than their opponents. Nobody else has been able to achieve this on a consistent basis. In terms of Tony G and his staff of Swedish coaches, they haven't bought into the national plan Aus has been trying to implement. Moreover, the underage teams won't have been deploying Tony G style Matildas football either. 1. The data presented in 2012 is more than 11 years old, my recollection is that it was data collected from the 2010 World Cup and maybe other tournaments around that time. The game has changed since then, there have been coaching and playing advancements that have, to at least some extent, negated the high possession tactics that successful teams of that era practiced. While I don't think Gustavsson is a great coach by any means, and a lot of his tactics leave a lot to be desired (use of substitutions or lack thereof for one), continuing to argue that what the successful playing style was 13-odd years ago should still be pursued today without considering how the game has developed is very narrow thinking. While I think having a broad national plan is beneficial to develop younger players, at the top level (both men's and women's) coaches need to use the resources they have to get the results. These resources very much include players who play successfully under different systems at their clubs, and are adept at adapting their games as required. 2. Gustavsson's staff of Swedish coaches? From what I can see there is only one other Swede on the Matilda's coaching staff, one of the assistant coaches. There are also Australian coaches there (Mel Andreatta, Tony Franken for example). Franken is keeper coach, so I would surmise he doesn't have much effect on playing style and tactics. What you say is true, that a lot of that data, subsequent methodology and playing style was based on the 2010 WC. Fair comment. Also, it is a fair point that it is 13 years old. Nevertheless, the best teams haven't deviated much over the last 20 odd years, in terms of style. Apart from a greater weighting on gengen pressing or counter pressing. The first contemporary team I saw playing this modern, high possession game, with similar structure to the present, was France playing us in a friendly in 2001. In the Australian paradigm to have someone not from the Football Aus Technical Department, appointing a national team coach, is totally amateurish. The Football Aus Technical Dept should be making that decision - like what occurs in France. ATM we have a bean counter/ businessperson making that decision - when they know little about football performance.ATM despite the Matlidas' success in the last game against Canada, there is a disconnect - with too much distance - between the central midfield line and the attack. There is often a hole between the midfield and attack. This was shown up against France and England, and also Canada ( which would on the day wasn't decisive in the outcome). We often don't have the classic Attacking Mid to dictate terms more effectively in the attacking half. To an extent Coomer- Cross sits, whilst Gorry goes forwards, but not as pronounced as the Socceroos, where Irvine, or now Baccus, moves forwards to assist the AM, where previously Mooy, and now O'Neill sits. In women's football, France and England, play the possession game prescribed as a national style by the Football Aus Tech Dept in 2012. Are you sure that is the case? I'm sure the bean counters/administration get involved from a financial point of view (e.g., this is how much we can afford to pay), but I can't believe that even Football Australia/FFA would not have significant football-specific input from their technical department in selecting national team coaches. By the way, the term is gegenpressing, not gengen pressing. I'm not sure which coaching course you've attended? It has been a constant theme discussed in my neck of the woods in coach education events. Even at NPL level, far too many decisions about football performance are made by Presidents - with money. They have often played the game some decades ago, but have never updated their knowledge. They don't understand how the game has evolved. It happened to me. When I was a NPL TD I wanted to recruit a player from South Hobart, the most successful club in the state , who was ageing. When I was watching him with the club President, he could not see how his clever movement off the ball, and speed of thought, constantly opened optimum passing lanes for his teammates. He made them look good as they passed to him when he created space - before they received the ball. He constantly provided them with optimal passing lanes. He was bit slow over the turf, but more than compensated with speed of thought and game sense. The club Pres, would not sign him. He went on to another NPL club, captained it, under the tutelage of one of my coaching course buddies. Later in the season they beat South Melb in a NPL National knock out comp, with him starring. They lost the final to WA club, Bayswater. This is relevant, because even Berger, who had the highest status and profile of any Aus TD we've had, was only one of a five person panel who appointed Holger. IMO Holger was easily the worst Socceroo coach we've had since Guus. The team started to go backwards through no renewal. The decision to appoint the coach in the Holger era, should have been entirely through the Football Aus Tech Dept. The controversy was that Holger also wasn't steeped in the direction of Aus at the time. He was an old school German coach - not the new stuff they embarked on in the early 2000s. The rationale, was that most of the Aus players under Holger's epoch, also hadn't been inculcated in the new methodology that the youth teams were being instructed in at the time. Ange immediately rebuilt, using the new standard possession game in Aus. He brought in Franjic, Wilkinson, Ogger. I've attended a big coaching workshop under Ange at the time- organised by the then TD of Football Tas. Learnt a lot from him about playing possession football. The problem is with coaches like Holger, and Tony G, is they are completely out of step with the Aussie coaching methodology - that coaches are now trained in, in Aus. Tony G may be a great player manager, but IMO he is taking the team backwards in playing style - possibly with the most talented national team of either gender we've had. Conversely, Arnie is value adding with the Socceroos. Who the hell is Ogger? If it is the player I think you mean, he was capped years before Ange took over.
|
|
|
|