Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xA nationwide pyramid should be pretty easy. NT doesn't really have anything beyond park football, so shouldn't be part of it. Then you can have: A-League 1: 16 clubs, 30 rounds, 2 relegated A-League 2: 16 clubs, 30 rounds, 2 promoted (the second team via play-offs), 2 relegated Championship: 2 conferences x 16 clubs, 30 rounds, 1 promoted from each conference (via play-offs), 2 relegated [the conferences would be divided into North: NSW/QLD/NNSW/ACT and South: VIC/SA/WA/TAS, although experience suggests they will be dominated by NSW and VIC teams respectively] NPL: 8 conferences, 1 per state. 10 clubs, 27 rounds for ACT/TAS, 16 clubs, 30 rounds for everyone else. Inter-state play-offs determine the 4 promoted teams. Below NPL level it should just go State League 1, State League 2, etc., splitting up into regionalised conferences as you get further down the pyramid. VIC could keep its current model. In TAS, SA, and WA you would just go with a north/south split and that should be enough. QLD could go straight to a North/Central/South split below the NPL, then to its nine regions. NSW is the complicated one. Riverina and Monaro should be fully integrated into Capital Football (which would become an ACT & SNSW federation). The north coast and New England clubs should be properly integrated into a NNSW pyramid. And then you have NSW proper. I would suggest three statewide tiers as currently the case (NSW Premier League, League 1, League 2). Then a conference split four ways (NE, SE, NW, SW). And then 16 regional divisions at the base of the pyramid, with 13 of them roughly corresponding to the present metropolitan districts, plus Central Coast, Illawarra and Western NSW as regional districts. A key element of the pyramid is to cover all parts of the country, allowing clubs representing mid-sized cities (like Ballarat, Rockhampton, Coffs Harbour, etc.) the chance to ascend up the tiers, rather than being stuck with district level football. If they make it all the way to the A-League it would be quite the fairy tale (like Morwell Falcons back in the day). That pyramid should only apply to First Grade teams (except perhaps for A-League academy squads). Reserve and youth teams should be part of a separate pyramid that tops out at statewide level, and runs on a club championship basis. There's no point getting 12 year olds to fly interstate. I like it. As you said, NSW (and by extension, Victoria, as you have brought up Riverina) is quite tricky. The Western NSW Branch can easily be folded into NNSW or continue as part of NSW (it essentially covers Bathurst, Lithgow, Dubbo, and as far as Bourke and Cobar). Riverina Branch can be easily folded into Capital Football (I have suggested this before) - with Albury, if they choose to, formally moving into Victoria, as they straddle in both FFV and NSW. Southern Branch... well that's a tricky one. Parts of it (Southern Tablelands/Goulburn) tend to come in and out of Capital Football, so I think that's the best home for that. Other sections of the Southern Branch (such as Shoalhaven and Highlands) seem to have some representation in Metro NSW in the Illawarra/South Coast. The rest of the Southern Branch (Far South Coast, Eurobodalla) probably could come into Capital Football as well. Will be an issue for travelling to Riverina if there's ever any need to though... Best way to run this new Southern Capital Football, would be for the NSW associations that they absorb to continue to run "independently", with their own Premier League/first grade competitions. If they choose to want to look at being promoted, they can formalise some sort of playoff system similar to NSW and NNSW Champion of Champions to determine which teams can go up. But... one thing about the conferences I don't like (Tier 3) is that it is still tied by borders. I think having NSW and VIC split across the two conferences alleviates that, but at some stage, some leagues are going to be stacked or deteriorated because of promotion being defined by borders. I think it's fine to have conferences, etc. But that we should be taking a season-by-season approach, and re-distributing based off who is in the league (the 16 most north-east clubs in one conference, and the 16 most south-west, as one example)
|