When the thing weighs 200kg what do you expect. If it wanted to kill the child it would have. Experts from what i've seen said it would have given a warning if it was going to become aggressive which, based on the footage, it did not.

Blame lands squarely on the parents here.

Do you have kids?

Interesting question. Can I just ask, are you equally bothered by animals being killed daily for meat, clothing, product testing etc or do you draw the line at endangered species and primates?

Let's face it guys, based on all evidence, this kid is unlikely to end up being much of a high flier

Yeah

Probably won't be able to do much more than eat bananas, grow muscles and hair, then fight anyone that looks at his mate

May also only speak in grunts, but might be able to use a toilet and pay taxes.


Edited by View from the fence: 31/5/2016 05:15:43 PM

If it was a chimp enclosure then opening fire is completely justified as those c*nts are fucked. However gorillas don't eat meat but can be very territorial and protective so a situation such as the Cincinnati one would end up in tears regardless of whatever outcome (The idiotic screaming by people would have just irritated the animal and hyped up the pin-dick with the gun)

*also there have been situations where gorillas have not harmed fallen children but I can't remember if they were silverbacks or not

Edited by marconi101: 31/5/2016 05:14:18 PM

:lol:
I'd be surprised by the toilet part frankly

Also:


Where was God looking when he let him fall in in the first place??!!
Bloody neglectful Gods


Edited by davide82: 31/5/2016 05:28:40 PM

Leap of Faith

[youtube]Zfuz7cTDNeI[/youtube]
You could see why they shot it but it could have crushed him like a twig if it wanted to

Religion is a complex game of counting hits and ignoring misses :lol:

Should've chucked in the mum as a distraction then taken the boy (orphan).

I still don't see what in the gorillas actions were aggressive.
It's a shame there's no way to find out I guess but I'd be willing to bet the stupid kid wouldn't have come to any harm besides some cuts and bruises from being carried away from the morons above like any young gorilla would be dragged.

:d

and other atavistic measures...

Thankfully it wasn't a Panda that got in there

BETH would have to choose which one was the most cute/impressive/endangered.

What I find most amusing about the whole situation is everyone is always carrying on about 'Oh, think of the children'.

Cincinnati Zoo thinks of the children, and now everybody is up in arms crying 'Oh, think of the Gorilla'.

Or from Dostoyevsky's perspective: People should be pushed into economic hardship to not be able to afford to go to the zoo in the first place...

:-K

:lol: screw children.

Don't worry, knuckle draggers like you and your brats will be there to kill everything :roll:

I never knew you were a vegan mate.

Edited by Roar_Brisbane: 31/5/2016 08:14:40 PM

Level 5 brah, don't eat anything that casts a shadow :lol:

So Gorilla > human child

Wheres the Panda fit in

So that's a no then?

When a SJW mod locks my thread.



Edited by Conservative: 31/5/2016 09:12:31 PM

The answer is no which you will use to justify that i have no idea how hard it is to look after children which is false. The other option is the compassionate argument where "you never really know until you're a parent" which is irrelevant.

this place is full of nerds who would never make their school football team but instead try to leech off the sport by being glorified bloggers pretending to be journalists

Step away from the ouzo. :-$