bypopulardemand
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:Wenger on Theo Quote:I want it resolved by Christmas. His right position is through the middle in the future Interesting to see that it seems like he is really coming around to the idea of Theo through the middle. He is... it'll flush out whether it's about the money...
|
|
|
|
KenGooner_GCU
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
It's about the money.
Hello
|
|
|
bypopulardemand
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
KenGooner_GCU wrote:It's about the money. I'm sure it is...
|
|
|
moofa
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.4K,
Visits: 0
|
bypopulardemand wrote:KenGooner_GCU wrote:It's about the money. I'm sure it is... He is a known Liverpool fan and Liverpool could offer him a spot in the centre so he might go there without the offer of extra money
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
Starting XI v United: Mannone, Sagna, Santos, Mertesacker, Vermaelen, Arteta, Wilshere, Ramsey, Cazorla, Podolski, Giroud.
Just one question, WHY THE FUCK IS RAMSEY STARTING!!
EDIT: Scratch that, considering our injuries and the fact Theo played 120+ minutes midweek it's probably not a bad idea to have him coming off the bench.
Edited by sydneycroatia58: 3/11/2012 10:57:45 PM
|
|
|
bypopulardemand
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:Starting XI v United: Mannone, Sagna, Santos, Mertesacker, Vermaelen, Arteta, Wilshere, Ramsey, Cazorla, Podolski, Giroud.
Just one question, WHY THE FUCK IS RAMSEY STARTING!!
EDIT: Scratch that, considering our injuries and the fact Theo played 120+ minutes midweek it's probably not a bad idea to have him coming off the bench.
Edited by sydneycroatia58: 3/11/2012 10:57:45 PM I dont think its too bad... Ramsey played quite well in the that last 1-0 win against them aswell... Hes just inconsistent, like theo, like arsharvin
|
|
|
jlm8695
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
Ramsey was decent against Man City out wide, was poor last week but so was our whole team.
|
|
|
jlm8695
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
Worrying that League cup aside, we haven't really created much in the past 3 games. Not much against Schalke, 1/2 against QPR, and none today.
Still, wasn't expecting anything out of today's game, would have been please with a point. Fulham is a must win next week though, as is Schalke midweek.
|
|
|
KenGooner_GCU
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
I can't imagine a top four finish this season, lacklustre all over.
Hello
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
I don't watch too many Arsenal games but:-
- Surely someone is better than Santos? Valencia and Rafael had far too many runs along the line unchecked.
- Arteta in Song's position? Surely he is better off somewhere else because since Song's departure it seems that Arteta has't been as influential?
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
benelsmore wrote:I don't watch too many Arsenal games but:-
- Surely someone is better than Santos? Valencia and Rafael had far too many runs along the line unchecked.
- Arteta in Song's position? Surely he is better off somewhere else because since Song's departure it seems that Arteta has't been as influential? Completely agree on Santos. The sooner Gibbs is back the better. As for Arteta, apart from the the last 2 games he has been an immense upgrade on Song. He actually gives us some sort of solidity in the middle that we never had with Song in there.
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
On the result, shouldn't be any surprise, we've been a shower of shit against United at OT every game for the last 3-4 years. Fucking huge game against Schalke coming up.
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:benelsmore wrote:I don't watch too many Arsenal games but:-
- Surely someone is better than Santos? Valencia and Rafael had far too many runs along the line unchecked.
- Arteta in Song's position? Surely he is better off somewhere else because since Song's departure it seems that Arteta has't been as influential? Completely agree on Santos. The sooner Gibbs is back the better. As for Arteta, apart from the the last 2 games he has been an immense upgrade on Song. He actually gives us some sort of solidity in the middle that we never had with Song in there. It seems so but with his talent do you feel he is perhaps wasted there a little? I'd want him further up the pitch dictating play. I guess you have Carzola for that, I just noticed Arteta wasn't what I remember.
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
benelsmore wrote:I don't watch too many Arsenal games but:-
- Surely someone is better than Santos? Valencia and Rafael had far too many runs along the line unchecked.
- Arteta in Song's position? Surely he is better off somewhere else because since Song's departure it seems that Arteta has't been as influential? I dont agree about Arteta but i agree 100% about Santos. This is not the first time he has been rubbish. Even with Gibbs injured Santos shouldnt be in the team i believe Miguel would be a batter choice as a back up left back to Gibbs. Did anyone notice at half-time RVP took off his shit jersey and gave it to Santos, what was with that first time i seen it happen at half time.
|
|
|
KenGooner_GCU
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:benelsmore wrote:I don't watch too many Arsenal games but:-
- Surely someone is better than Santos? Valencia and Rafael had far too many runs along the line unchecked.
- Arteta in Song's position? Surely he is better off somewhere else because since Song's departure it seems that Arteta has't been as influential? Completely agree on Santos. The sooner Gibbs is back the better. As for Arteta, apart from the the last 2 games he has been an immense upgrade on Song. He actually gives us some sort of solidity in the middle that we never had with Song in there. Disagree with Arteta, I've very respect for him but he's not a destroyer. Arteta has been caught out a few times for pace and has been forced into a foul, he doesn't have the required phyiscal presence to perform the Song role. With big Diaby out (usually), you have to say that we look physically weak there. Having said that, Arteta is doing well as a deep lying playmaker but I don't think he's solid enough as a holding midfielder.
Hello
|
|
|
Michaelkregs
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 297,
Visits: 0
|
I wonder if Santos has ever heard the words "don't dive in"...
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
KenGooner_GCU wrote:sydneycroatia58 wrote:benelsmore wrote:I don't watch too many Arsenal games but:-
- Surely someone is better than Santos? Valencia and Rafael had far too many runs along the line unchecked.
- Arteta in Song's position? Surely he is better off somewhere else because since Song's departure it seems that Arteta has't been as influential? Completely agree on Santos. The sooner Gibbs is back the better. As for Arteta, apart from the the last 2 games he has been an immense upgrade on Song. He actually gives us some sort of solidity in the middle that we never had with Song in there. Disagree with Arteta, I've very respect for him but he's not a destroyer. Arteta has been caught out a few times for pace and has been forced into a foul, he doesn't have the required phyiscal presence to perform the Song role. With big Diaby out (usually), you have to say that we look physically weak there. Having said that, Arteta is doing well as a deep lying playmaker but I don't think he's solid enough as a holding midfielder. Arteta's not a destroyer, but neither was Song, or at least he didn't play like one. Arteta is much more solid than Song because he's much more disciplined, he's willing to actually protect the back 4 and not maraud forward every 2nd possession like Song would. Arteta is much much better at the role than Song was and much better than Diaby would be. Arteta is a better tackler, completing 3.8 tackles this season compared to Song's 2.9 last season. He also gives away less fouls, giving away 2.5 a game to Song's 2.9 last season. He's streets ahead as a passer with his 93.2% pass completion to Song's 84.3%. He makes more interceptions with 2.4 a game compared to Song's 1.9. So yeah easy to sit there and say Arteta can't play that role like Song, when he actually plays it better than Song. Edited by sydneycroatia58: 4/11/2012 09:42:25 AM
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
Anyway, wasn't as horrible a night as it could've been with Chelsea, City, Sp*rs and Everton all dropping points.
Feel a little bit better about last night after waking up to see Wigan beat Sp*rs at home :lol:
|
|
|
Gooner4life_8
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:Anyway, wasn't as horrible a night as it could've been with Chelsea, City, Sp*rs and Everton all dropping points. Not sure if I feel relieved about that, or annoyed that we didn't capitalise on this opportunity. Probably relieved, I should never have been expecting to get much from United away.
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
Gooner4life_8 wrote:sydneycroatia58 wrote:Anyway, wasn't as horrible a night as it could've been with Chelsea, City, Sp*rs and Everton all dropping points. Not sure if I feel relieved about that, or annoyed that we didn't capitalise on this opportunity. Probably relieved, I should never have been expecting to get much from United away. Yeah I'm more relieved because I was always expecting we wouldn't get anything more than a draw at OT
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
:lol: The amount of people suggesting it's time for Arsene to go is just insane.
|
|
|
Hinderz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 456,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote::lol: The amount of people suggesting it's time for Arsene to go is just insane. I dont know if it is insane. While I don't think Wenger needs to go.We seem to go through the same thing every year with little improvement.We have had our worse starts two years in a row, there has to be some changes. Whether its tactics, personnel, manager or whatever Im not sure. SAF completely outfoxed Arsene this morning, marking Arteta out of the game, taking cleverly off when it became clear that a Red card was coming; and thats before we get to the self inflicted wounds, such as playing Santos against Valencia. As captain Van Persie was right to question Wenger and the club's direction in that now infamous meeting; (as a fan) he was wrong to gone to United, but he was right to question the club. Its clear that RVP left for footballing reasons, his reasons not ours. Im not that disappointed by the scoreline, 2-1 at OT isn't unusual, but the manner of the performance was terrible, we were lucky it wasnt more. Edited by Hinderz: 4/11/2012 01:23:43 PM
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
Maybe Wenger leaving wouldn't be a bad thing. Would make a lot of people realise just how good we have it and it wouldn't be long before people would be begging for Arsene back.
|
|
|
Hinderz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 456,
Visits: 0
|
Its all ifs and buts depending on who came in and the circumstances under which they'd have to work. As it stands, its hard to see whether its the board or Wenger or a combination of both at the root of our problems, but I don't think its unfair to say that as a club we arent progressing, which ultimately is the problem.
There are so many aspects of our club that we get right, but so many others we get wrong and it seems like we rest on our laurels and dont tackle the problems, or have no idea how to tackle them; which is where this lack of progress/ambition idea comes in.
|
|
|
KenGooner_GCU
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:KenGooner_GCU wrote:sydneycroatia58 wrote:benelsmore wrote:I don't watch too many Arsenal games but:-
- Surely someone is better than Santos? Valencia and Rafael had far too many runs along the line unchecked.
- Arteta in Song's position? Surely he is better off somewhere else because since Song's departure it seems that Arteta has't been as influential? Completely agree on Santos. The sooner Gibbs is back the better. As for Arteta, apart from the the last 2 games he has been an immense upgrade on Song. He actually gives us some sort of solidity in the middle that we never had with Song in there. Disagree with Arteta, I've very respect for him but he's not a destroyer. Arteta has been caught out a few times for pace and has been forced into a foul, he doesn't have the required phyiscal presence to perform the Song role. With big Diaby out (usually), you have to say that we look physically weak there. Having said that, Arteta is doing well as a deep lying playmaker but I don't think he's solid enough as a holding midfielder. Arteta's not a destroyer, but neither was Song, or at least he didn't play like one. Arteta is much more solid than Song because he's much more disciplined, he's willing to actually protect the back 4 and not maraud forward every 2nd possession like Song would. Arteta is much much better at the role than Song was and much better than Diaby would be. Arteta is a better tackler, completing 3.8 tackles this season compared to Song's 2.9 last season. He also gives away less fouls, giving away 2.5 a game to Song's 2.9 last season. He's streets ahead as a passer with his 93.2% pass completion to Song's 84.3%. He makes more interceptions with 2.4 a game compared to Song's 1.9. So yeah easy to sit there and say Arteta can't play that role like Song, when he actually plays it better than Song. Edited by sydneycroatia58: 4/11/2012 09:42:25 AM Don't read too much into the statistics, Arteta is still being drawn into fouls by physically stronger and faster opponents. There's a case for arguing that his "tackle rate" (wow that sounds weird) is higher because he's been forced to make those challenges because he knows he doesn't have the physical presence. Regardless, there is no reason why he cannot perform a similar role with Song playing alongside him. Despite the statistics showing otherwise, Arteta plays a simple game and while he does play in an astonishing pass every now and then, Song played more than his fair share of important passes. I do find it strange how Alex Song was supposed to be a great player last season and was a "really key member" of the team and now his sale has resulted in "an immense upgrade". Hinderz, you are exactly right. We cannot, as a football club, sit on our laurels expecting the club to turn it around however it expects to do so. Seven years and absolutely nothing has happened. Sydcro, I agree with you in one respect, it's easy to say who has to go but a whole lot harder to say who should succeed. Despite this, the man in charge must be held accountable for seven years of failure. We are suffering from a lack of progress and a lack of ambition. It's akin, as a BBC blogger (who I think is a twat) said today, Dell Boy's famous saying: "this time next year, we'll be millionaires." I also think that Stewart Robson's claims bout a rift between Wenger and Bould have certainly been validated in recent weeks. Something isn't quite right at the back and we can't blame Andre Santos for it all.
Hello
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
Main thing is, right now, Wenger is the best man for the job and getting rid of him now or at the end of the season would probably do more harm than good. Like he said at the AGM, we all complain when we come 3rd and qualify for the Champions League, but he won't be here if we finish 15th one day
As for Robson, he's been peddling that shit about a rift between Arsene and Steve for months :lol: Cunt has been extra bitter since he lost his job with the club
Edited by sydneycroatia58: 4/11/2012 03:35:01 PM
|
|
|
KenGooner_GCU
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:Main thing is, right now, Wenger is the best man for the job and getting rid of him now or at the end of the season would probably do more harm than good. Like he said at the AGM, we all complain when we come 3rd and qualify for the Champions League, but he won't be here if we finish 15th one day
As for Robson, he's been peddling that shit about a rift between Arsene and Steve for months :lol: Cunt has been extra bitter since he lost his job with the club
Edited by sydneycroatia58: 4/11/2012 03:35:01 PM You're probably right but you can't deny that things are going downhill, progress isn't happening and something has to give. I hope it's the board and not Wenger. The rift was reported about a week ago and despite opinions on him, you have to say that he might be right at the moment.
Hello
|
|
|
Hinderz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 456,
Visits: 0
|
Wenger gets alot of plaudits as the economist of football (like there is nobody else in the game who understands business and economics) but it shouldn't be hard for an economist to see the Pareto principle in the success of champion sides; with the top 20% of a team's players responsible for 80% of success (like barca would be worth mentioning without Messi Xavi and Iniesta) We could use a bit of Rank and Yank leadership, not this socialised squad which rewards mediocrity, but rather than cutting the bottom 10% and rewarding the top 20%l we do virtually the opposite, selling from the top and reward unproven players. Quote:Andy Dunn's Big Match Verdict: Why Arsenal's star struck response to RVP reveals the club they have become http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/andy-dunns-big-match-verdict-1415442Seeing as though so many people now park civilised behaviour at the front door of a football stadium, Robin van Persie might have been excused a one-fingered ¬salute. If 2,000 blokes – I assume blokes – had spent half an hour calling me a “c***”, I suspect my celebrations would have been more vociferous than Van Persie’s calming double-handed gesture. I’m no prude, but surely those Arsenal supporters could have found a more socially acceptable way of communicating their anger. There was another chant which made you wonder how a game of football, or a footballer changing employers, can warp a mind. Considering the abuse their manager has had to endure over the years, you might have thought they would know better. Van Persie did not bite – but his response could not have been more biting. It was not that he scored. That was inevitable. It was not that he gave Andre Santos his shirt as the teams broke after 45 minutes. It was that he did not bother asking for Santos’s jersey in return. And in that one humiliating cameo, this Arsenal team – this pale, limp, weak, ineffective shadow of the Vieira/Adams/Petit/Dixon sides who once strode barrel-chested into this stadium – was defined. There are simply too many players, with Santos as their standard-bearer, who feel lucky to be at this elite level. Can you imagine Vieira’s response if one of his Invincibles had asked for a United shirt at half-time? At ANY time, come to think of it. Van Persie saw the malaise taking a grip, saw a collection of players for whom winning nothing was fine, saw the mediocrity of new recruits, saw a manager accepting it all. And he wanted no more of it. He wanted what Arsene Wenger and Arsenal once symbolised – that relentless drive for excellence and achievement. He knew he could find it at Old Trafford. The damning indictment was that United barely shed a bead of perspiration in victory. United were sloppy, casual. Yet Wenger’s team never looked likely to capitalise. Highlighting the abysmal performance from Santos is just puppy-kicking. Too easy. And the defensive rick that led to Van Persie’s goal – this time from Thomas Vermaelen – is a weekly feature of Arsenal life. Mikel Arteta’s best form is a dot on the horizon.But more alarming were the contributions of those players who were meant to compensate for the loss of Van Persie. Maybe you can give Santi Cazorla an off-day (his late strike was irrelevant).But Olivier Giroud and Lukas Podolski were shockingly ponderous. That only highlighted the appalling decision to start Theo Walcott on the bench. With 10 men including Theo, Arsenal looked a more dangerous side than with 11 men without him. It was a selection that smacked of pig-headedness. And when Wenger is getting things horribly wrong, that is when Arsenal supporters should really worry. According to those supporters, Van Persie is a so-and-so. Well, if that is the case, he is a clever one. He saw this coming. Meanwhile, Arsenal fans charted 'Wenger, Wenger, sort it out' after the manager's worst start to the season for 16 years. Edited by Hinderz: 5/11/2012 12:51:39 AM
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
:lol: There's a few things you can be sure of in this world, the sun will set in the west and rise in the east, Sp*rs will always choke and Arsenal will always be linked with Yoann Gourcuff :lol:
|
|
|
Hinderz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 456,
Visits: 0
|
I dont know about the validity of the numbers but $588,000 a week not playing through persistent injury or lack of form is crazy.
[size=6]FIRST TEAM WAGE (pwk)[/size] Lukas Podolski £107,000 Tomas Rosicky £80,000 Per Mertesacker £80,000 Andrey Arshavin £78,000 Santi Carzorla £70,000 Mikel Arteta £70,000 Thomas Vermaelen £70,000 Theo Walcott £60,000 Olivier Giroud £60,000 Gervinho £60,000 Bacary Sagna £60,000 Marouane Chamakh £60,000 Andre Santos £60,000 Jack Wilshere £60,000 Abou Diaby £60,000 Denilson £60,000 Laurent Koscielny £60,000 Johan Djourou £50,000 Kieran Gibbs £50,000 Nicklas Bendtner £50,000 Sebastien Squillaci £50,000 Aaron Ramsey £50,000 Wojciech Szczesny £50,000 Lukasz Fabianski £50,000 Ju Young Park £50,000 Vito Mannone £25,000 Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain £25,000 Carl Jenkinson £25,000 Emmanuel Frimpong £25,000 Francis Coquelin £25,000 Ryo Miyaichi £12,000 Ignasi Miquel £10,000 Joel Campbell £10,000
|
|
|