imnofreak
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K,
Visits: 0
|
:lol: This is fun.
PS PB your sig is amazing.
|
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:ricecrackers wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:ricecrackers wrote:benelsmore wrote:ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:loooool Russia is so pro-troll.
Crimea might be autonomous but it's still part of Ukraine, no different to Catalonia and Spain.
-PB a democratic referendum vote to re-join Russia says otherwise the defeated option on the ballot was to remain an autonomous state within Ukraine (whose government has since been overthrown by an illegal and violent coup) For the 400th fucking time, it's not a fair referendum if the option to re-join Ukraine wasn't on the fucking ballot you illiterate fucking spastic. what do you mean re-join Ukraine? they were already an autonomous state within Ukraine that option to remain so was on the ballot what are you even talking about? [size=9]I've heard on numerous news channels that it wasn't[/size]? Have you seen the ballot paper? this seems to be the issue here Choice 1: Are you in favour of the reunification of Crimea with Russia as a subject of the Russian Federation?[75] Choice 2: Are you in favour of restoring the 1992 Constitution and the status of Crimea as a part of Ukraine?[75] http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/94/2014_Crimean_referendum_ballot.pnghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_referendum,_2014#cite_note-nyt-2014-two-choices-75Edited to remove epic page stretch - ImnoEdited by imnofreak: 20/3/2014 11:20:58 AM That's not even a picture of an actual ballot paper, simply a sample that looks like it's been typed up in word :lol: And Wikipedia is hardly a decent cited source :lol: Seems legit. But by all means keep going. -PB both the ABC and New York times published the translation of the ballot options prior to the spin being applied. the wikipedia article references the latter do you want to argue with them? Well yeah I would considering they both said that there wasn't another option on the ballot paper as well. -PB show me the 'real' version of the ballot paper then
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
By the way "imnofreak", I'd like to take this opportunity to apologize for earlier calling you "stupid". Whilst it remains my opinion, I realise I was out of line and the forum was no place to express it. I hope we're all good now.
:cool:
Edited by ricecrackers: 20/3/2014 02:18:24 PM
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:ricecrackers wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:ricecrackers wrote:benelsmore wrote:ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:loooool Russia is so pro-troll.
Crimea might be autonomous but it's still part of Ukraine, no different to Catalonia and Spain.
-PB a democratic referendum vote to re-join Russia says otherwise the defeated option on the ballot was to remain an autonomous state within Ukraine (whose government has since been overthrown by an illegal and violent coup) For the 400th fucking time, it's not a fair referendum if the option to re-join Ukraine wasn't on the fucking ballot you illiterate fucking spastic. what do you mean re-join Ukraine? they were already an autonomous state within Ukraine that option to remain so was on the ballot what are you even talking about? [size=9]I've heard on numerous news channels that it wasn't[/size]? Have you seen the ballot paper? this seems to be the issue here Choice 1: Are you in favour of the reunification of Crimea with Russia as a subject of the Russian Federation?[75] Choice 2: Are you in favour of restoring the 1992 Constitution and the status of Crimea as a part of Ukraine?[75] http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/94/2014_Crimean_referendum_ballot.pnghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_referendum,_2014#cite_note-nyt-2014-two-choices-75Edited to remove epic page stretch - ImnoEdited by imnofreak: 20/3/2014 11:20:58 AM That's not even a picture of an actual ballot paper, simply a sample that looks like it's been typed up in word :lol: And Wikipedia is hardly a decent cited source :lol: Seems legit. But by all means keep going. -PB both the ABC and New York times published the translation of the ballot options prior to the spin being applied. the wikipedia article references the latter do you want to argue with them? Well yeah I would considering they both said that there wasn't another option on the ballot paper as well. -PB show me the 'real' version of the ballot paper then Bit hard when no media were allowed near voting booths (that and reports of people having to vote at gunpoint). You aren't the least bit skeptical of news reports that have come out of Russia? :lol: What are your thoughts on the propaganda crusades? -PB
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:ricecrackers wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:ricecrackers wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:ricecrackers wrote:benelsmore wrote:ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:loooool Russia is so pro-troll.
Crimea might be autonomous but it's still part of Ukraine, no different to Catalonia and Spain.
-PB a democratic referendum vote to re-join Russia says otherwise the defeated option on the ballot was to remain an autonomous state within Ukraine (whose government has since been overthrown by an illegal and violent coup) For the 400th fucking time, it's not a fair referendum if the option to re-join Ukraine wasn't on the fucking ballot you illiterate fucking spastic. what do you mean re-join Ukraine? they were already an autonomous state within Ukraine that option to remain so was on the ballot what are you even talking about? [size=9]I've heard on numerous news channels that it wasn't[/size]? Have you seen the ballot paper? this seems to be the issue here Choice 1: Are you in favour of the reunification of Crimea with Russia as a subject of the Russian Federation?[75] Choice 2: Are you in favour of restoring the 1992 Constitution and the status of Crimea as a part of Ukraine?[75] http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/94/2014_Crimean_referendum_ballot.pnghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_referendum,_2014#cite_note-nyt-2014-two-choices-75Edited to remove epic page stretch - ImnoEdited by imnofreak: 20/3/2014 11:20:58 AM That's not even a picture of an actual ballot paper, simply a sample that looks like it's been typed up in word :lol: And Wikipedia is hardly a decent cited source :lol: Seems legit. But by all means keep going. -PB both the ABC and New York times published the translation of the ballot options prior to the spin being applied. the wikipedia article references the latter do you want to argue with them? Well yeah I would considering they both said that there wasn't another option on the ballot paper as well. -PB show me the 'real' version of the ballot paper then Bit hard when [size=8]no media were allowed near voting booths (that and reports of people having to vote at gunpoint)[/size]. You aren't the least bit skeptical of news reports that have come out of Russia? :lol: What are your thoughts on the propaganda crusades? -PB your statement contradicts itself we're done here
|
|
|
jlm8695
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:ricecrackers wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:ricecrackers wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:ricecrackers wrote:benelsmore wrote:ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:loooool Russia is so pro-troll.
Crimea might be autonomous but it's still part of Ukraine, no different to Catalonia and Spain.
-PB a democratic referendum vote to re-join Russia says otherwise the defeated option on the ballot was to remain an autonomous state within Ukraine (whose government has since been overthrown by an illegal and violent coup) For the 400th fucking time, it's not a fair referendum if the option to re-join Ukraine wasn't on the fucking ballot you illiterate fucking spastic. what do you mean re-join Ukraine? they were already an autonomous state within Ukraine that option to remain so was on the ballot what are you even talking about? [size=9]I've heard on numerous news channels that it wasn't[/size]? Have you seen the ballot paper? this seems to be the issue here Choice 1: Are you in favour of the reunification of Crimea with Russia as a subject of the Russian Federation?[75] Choice 2: Are you in favour of restoring the 1992 Constitution and the status of Crimea as a part of Ukraine?[75] http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/94/2014_Crimean_referendum_ballot.pnghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean_referendum,_2014#cite_note-nyt-2014-two-choices-75Edited to remove epic page stretch - ImnoEdited by imnofreak: 20/3/2014 11:20:58 AM That's not even a picture of an actual ballot paper, simply a sample that looks like it's been typed up in word :lol: And Wikipedia is hardly a decent cited source :lol: Seems legit. But by all means keep going. -PB both the ABC and New York times published the translation of the ballot options prior to the spin being applied. the wikipedia article references the latter do you want to argue with them? Well yeah I would considering they both said that there wasn't another option on the ballot paper as well. -PB show me the 'real' version of the ballot paper then Bit hard when [size=8]no media were allowed near voting booths (that and reports of people having to vote at gunpoint)[/size]. You aren't the least bit skeptical of news reports that have come out of Russia? :lol: What are your thoughts on the propaganda crusades? -PB your statement contradicts itself we're done here Hardly, how hard is it for someone who has been held at gunpoint to inform the media of this fact? The media don't have to be in the location to source information. (Not saying it's true or not, justs saying it's possible).
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
both likely false
|
|
|
Heineken
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K,
Visits: 0
|
RedKat wrote:Two bits of news
1) With Crimea looking all but a part of Russia, Putins turning his attention to Estonia.
2) Possible wreckage of the MH370 flight in Australia waters 4 hours from Perth I do believe the United States have sent a few fighter squadrons to a couple of those small countries that border Russia. Troops, and tanks too, all in the name of "military exercises".
WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!

|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:both likely false But everything is skewed by western media :lol: -PB
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:imnofreak wrote:No, you didn't. When I edited it the post, the page was still massively stretched which was 6 minutes after your post.
I didn't delete anything, the link is still there in your post, it's just not embedded. And it's still a massive picture.
Carry on. thats because you were editing it after i'd already edited it see the problem? perhaps you should've refreshed the page before pulling the trigger #-o how much are they paying you by the way? If that were true it would have come up that you'd edited the post first. And the edited post would have appeared when imno clicked the 'edit' button. Furthermore, did you even read the article to which you linked which states that option 2 was for independence and option 1 was to join russia but there was no option to return to the status quo.
|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
97% is very close to a Pyongyang-style 100% vote.
It's like 1991 never happened.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
thupercoach wrote:97% is very close to a Pyongyang-style 100% vote.
It's like 1991 never happened. Who's going to vote against the Russians when their soldiers are standing in the polling booths armed to the teeth and watching which box you put your vote in?
|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:thupercoach wrote:97% is very close to a Pyongyang-style 100% vote.
It's like 1991 never happened. Who's going to vote against the Russians when their soldiers are standing in the polling booths armed to the teeth and watching which box you put your vote in? Exactly.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:thupercoach wrote:97% is very close to a Pyongyang-style 100% vote.
It's like 1991 never happened. Who's going to vote against the Russians when their soldiers are standing in the polling booths armed to the teeth and watching which box you put your vote in? Oh but they're not Russians, they're just Crimean dudes looking out for the own people! -PB
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:afromanGT wrote:thupercoach wrote:97% is very close to a Pyongyang-style 100% vote.
It's like 1991 never happened. Who's going to vote against the Russians when their soldiers are standing in the polling booths armed to the teeth and watching which box you put your vote in? Oh but they're not Russians, they're just Crimean dudes looking out for the own people! -PB Ah. They just borrowed a cup of brand new Kalashnikov from their neighbours. I get it now.
|
|
|
Polemides
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 460,
Visits: 0
|
EDIT: It's bad enough you try and post your racist vile here, at a minimum to post an article you need a link.
Edited by Joffa: 22/3/2014 12:49:52 PM
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
"this is no longer the Jew-SSR"  -PB
|
|
|
Polemides
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 460,
Visits: 0
|
Interview with former Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser: "US thinks rules are for inferior nations, it's in their DNA"
[youtube]HMQLclBCEB4[/youtube]
Edited by polemides: 21/3/2014 09:51:33 AM
|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Back in the JewSSR. You don't know how lucky you are, boy. Oh, Pole said to say Zieg Heil.
|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Oh btw... Quoting someone whose name is "Elder of ZyklonB"
Mods, do your job.
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
"Jewmerica"
|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
u4486662 wrote:"Jewmerica"  Stoopids, they can't even make a well sounding racist comment. "Jewmerica" makes no sense. JewSA OTOH would've at least impressed me with inventiveness.. Although it sounds a bit Latino, doesn't it? Or if you like, "Jew World Order" would've had a nice conspiratorial ring to it too. Or Yidsrael if one is really reaching. Writing copy for anti-Semites, that's what I'm doing now... They can't even do that properly. Edited by thupercoach: 21/3/2014 01:49:29 PM
|
|
|
Polemides
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 460,
Visits: 0
|
Interesting one this
[youtube]5Xt5IQrC5ZE[/youtube]
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:"this is no longer the Jew-SSR"  -PB I don't remember The Beatles writing a song about that one.
|
|
|
Heineken
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K,
Visits: 0
|
It's looking more and more likely that the 'debris' found in the Southern Indian Ocean, south of Perth, is that of MH370. The Malaysian Prime Minister has come out and confirmed that, that's the most likely scenario. However, due to the currents in the IO, the debris may have drifted over 100kms a day, so we may never know where the exact crash location was, even if the searchers do find the black box.
WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!

|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Heineken wrote:It's looking more and more likely that the 'debris' found in the Southern Indian Ocean, south of Perth, is that of MH370. The Malaysian Prime Minister has come out and confirmed that, that's the most likely scenario. However, due to the currents in the IO, the debris may have drifted over 100kms a day, so we may never know where the exact crash location was, even if the searchers do find the black box. any pings received from the black box yet?
|
|
|
zimbos_05
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Heineken wrote:It's looking more and more likely that the 'debris' found in the Southern Indian Ocean, south of Perth, is that of MH370. The Malaysian Prime Minister has come out and confirmed that, that's the most likely scenario. However, due to the currents in the IO, the debris may have drifted over 100kms a day, so we may never know where the exact crash location was, even if the searchers do find the black box. Whilst the debris spotted so far has been the most credible evidence, i find it interesting that the Malaysians have made this declaration without any confirmed evidence. They going off pings and a few ideas and have basically taken the most likely theory and run with that in the hope to put an end to what? What for me the big question is, why was the plane so far off course?
|
|
|
Heineken
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K,
Visits: 0
|
Egypt sentences 528 Morsi supporters to deathQuote:CAIRO — Rights activists lashed out Monday at the death sentences handed down against 528 supporters of the Muslim Brotherhood as part of a government campaign to squash the Islamist movement.
More than 150 of 545 defendants stood trial on charges of killing a policeman and attacking police. The others were tried in absentia, Egypt news agency MENA reported; 16 defendants were acquitted.
The court hearings that convicted the defendants lasted two days. Defense lawyers complained they never had a chance to present their case in the trial held in the city of Minya.
"This is the largest single batch of simultaneous death sentences we've seen in recent years, not just in Egypt but anywhere in the world," Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui, deputy director of the Middle East and North Africa Program at Amnesty International, said Monday in a report.
"Imposing death sentences of this magnitude in a single case makes Egypt surpass most other countries' use of capital punishment in a year," she added.
The verdict precedes another case set to open on Tuesday in which nearly 700 defendants are facing similar charges.
"The trials are part of the raging battle between the military-led government and Muslim Brotherhood," said Fawaz Gerges, professor of international relations at the London School of Economics.
"What these trials tell us is that the government has been systematically trying to weaken the Muslim Brotherhood and force them to accept the road map set by the military government."
Monday's ruling comes nearly nine months after the Muslim Brotherhood's Mohammed Morsi was ousted from the presidency . After millions took to the streets to protest against Morsi's presidency last June, Egypt's army chief Gen. Abdel Fattah al-Sisi forced Morsi aside and issued a political program that called for fresh parliamentary and presidential elections, which are expected to be held this year.
Security forces put down massive Brotherhood-led protests that followed Morsi's arrest. The Brotherhood was outlawed, and thousands of the group's supporters, leaders and members have been thrown in jail while others have fled the country.
Brotherhood supporters have continued some protests against the authorities although the numbers in the streets have dwindled. Polls have shown strong support for the military and its handling of the unrest, especially in the capital of Cairo.
Morsi opponents accused him of becoming a dictator and said he was ruining the promise of Egypt's revolution of 2011 in which longtime dictator Hosni Murbarak was also forced out by the military.
"What the trials say is that the military-led government has failed so far to basically force the Muslim Brothers to accept the status quo," Gerges said. "The trials really reflect the political stalemate that exists in Egypt."
The Muslim Brotherhood's London press office described Monday's ruling as an "inhumane and a clear violation of all norms of humane and legal justice" and said it will not weaken the group's resolve.
"The verdict is yet another clear indication that the corrupt judiciary is being utilized by the coup commanders to suppress the Egyptian revolution and install a brutal regime," it said in an e-mailed statement, vowing to appeal the ruling.
Monday's verdict can be appealed. H.A. Hellyer, a non-resident fellow at the Brookings Institution, said he doubts the death sentence will be implemented.
"This is a first stage court," Hellyer said. "There are others for the defendants to appeal to."
"But the issuing of the verdict in any case, even if it is almost certain to be overturned, is something to note when understanding what the legal system in Egypt is prepared to engage in when it comes to these types of cases," Hellyer said.
On Monday, a Cairo court resumed the trial of journalists with the Qatari-owned television network Al Jazeera. Australian Peter Greste, local journalist Baher Mohamed and Mohamed Fahmy, who is Egyptian-Canadian, appeared in court after being jailed for three months on charges of spreading false news and aiding the Brotherhood.
The trial was adjourned until March 31.
Al Jazeera Arabic reporter Abdullah Elshamy has been detained since last August without trial or charges.
"Without an independent and impartial process that can deliver truth and justice for all, many will question whether Egypt's criminal justice system has indeed anything to do with justice," Amnesty's Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui said Monday in a report. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2014/03/24/egypt-morsi-muslim-brotherhood/6815899/
WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!

|
|
|
Heineken
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K,
Visits: 0
|
zimbos_05 wrote:Heineken wrote:It's looking more and more likely that the 'debris' found in the Southern Indian Ocean, south of Perth, is that of MH370. The Malaysian Prime Minister has come out and confirmed that, that's the most likely scenario. However, due to the currents in the IO, the debris may have drifted over 100kms a day, so we may never know where the exact crash location was, even if the searchers do find the black box. Whilst the debris spotted so far has been the most credible evidence, i find it interesting that the Malaysians have made this declaration without any confirmed evidence. They going off pings and a few ideas and have basically taken the most likely theory and run with that in the hope to put an end to what? What for me the big question is, why was the plane so far off course? The investigation seems to be centered upon at the moment the co-pilot. Apparently Police have raided his house, and seized a couple of computers, a flight simulator, etc. Whilst it may not be fundamentalist religious terrorism, it's starting to look like perhaps political terrorism. Apparently the co-pilot was a member, or a major supporter of the Malaysian opposition. Who knows, we may never find out the truth.
WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!

|
|
|
jlm8695
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
So more than 150 were on trial for killing/attacking police, but all the others were sentenced to death for supporting an Islamist movement? Crazy, I thought things were meant to be better over there now.
|
|
|