Unshackled
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 241,
Visits: 0
|
Ah yes Bill Maher, the crypto-jew who fully supports Zionist policy in Israel and does his best to drum up hate against the "evil' muslims and their nations. The self proclaimed atheist who's comedy act revolves around bashing Muslims, Christians and pushing his political agendas.
|
|
|
|
trident
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Bill Maher owns republican Rick Santorum on Climate Change
Laying an epic smackdown!
[youtube]CMcpz87EahU[/youtube]
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Climate change sceptics versus the scientists - five common claims from those who believe that climate change is not man-made and global warming is a myth Claim 1: Global warming is not happening because it is cold Claim 2: Climate has changed throughout the earth's history Claim 3: Human emissions are tiny compared to natural CO2 Claim 4: Scientists are creating panic in order to get funding Claim 5: Antarctic sea ice is growing http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-08-21/talkaboutit-climate-change-sceptics-versus-the-scientists/6711084
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Draupnir wrote:tbitm wrote: Dunno man, its been pretty cold here in Melbourne Weather =/= climate. When are you guys going to accept that? Melbourne also doesn't equal global
|
|
|
trident
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
racism and conspiracy theory go hand in hand
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
I find it interesting because I don't read an article, see a name in it and think "that person is jewish", let alone think conspiracy.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
trident
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Unshackled wrote:paladisious wrote:The Guardian wrote:[size=6]Exxon knew of climate change in 1981, email says – but it funded deniers for 27 more years[/size] [size=9]Suzanne Goldenberg[/size], US environment correspondent Thursday 9 July 2015 06.41 AEST
A newly unearthed missive from [size=9]Lenny Bernstein[/size], a climate expert with the oil firm for 30 years, shows concerns over high presence of carbon dioxide in enormous gas field in south-east Asia factored into decision not to tap it
ExxonMobil, the world’s biggest oil company, knew as early as 1981 of climate change – seven years before it became a public issue, according to a newly discovered email from one of the firm’s own scientists. Despite this the firm spent millions over the next 27 years to promote climate denial.
The email from Exxon’s in-house climate expert provides evidence the company was aware of the connection between fossil fuels and climate change, and the potential for carbon-cutting regulations that could hurt its bottom line, over a generation ago – factoring that knowledge into its decision about an enormous gas field in south-east Asia. The field, off the coast of Indonesia, would have been the single largest source of global warming pollution at the time. Full article and email in sauce. Edited by paladisious: 9/7/2015 10:38:00 AM You will find a great number of 'gods chosen' pushing for climate change revolution and benefiting from positions of power and financial gain from it, much like they have done in the past with communism. I find it interesting that a lot of climate change policy revolves around nations relinquishing their sovereignty, promoting one world governance and improving big fish multinationals stranglehold by destroying smaller business competitors. Which conspiracy site did you read that on?
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
Unshackled wrote:paladisious wrote:The Guardian wrote:[size=6]Exxon knew of climate change in 1981, email says – but it funded deniers for 27 more years[/size] [size=9]Suzanne Goldenberg[/size], US environment correspondent Thursday 9 July 2015 06.41 AEST
A newly unearthed missive from [size=9]Lenny Bernstein[/size], a climate expert with the oil firm for 30 years, shows concerns over high presence of carbon dioxide in enormous gas field in south-east Asia factored into decision not to tap it
ExxonMobil, the world’s biggest oil company, knew as early as 1981 of climate change – seven years before it became a public issue, according to a newly discovered email from one of the firm’s own scientists. Despite this the firm spent millions over the next 27 years to promote climate denial.
The email from Exxon’s in-house climate expert provides evidence the company was aware of the connection between fossil fuels and climate change, and the potential for carbon-cutting regulations that could hurt its bottom line, over a generation ago – factoring that knowledge into its decision about an enormous gas field in south-east Asia. The field, off the coast of Indonesia, would have been the single largest source of global warming pollution at the time. Full article and email in sauce. Edited by paladisious: 9/7/2015 10:38:00 AM You will find a great number of 'gods chosen' pushing for climate change revolution and benefiting from positions of power and financial gain from it, much like they have done in the past with communism. I find it interesting that a lot of climate change policy revolves around nations relinquishing their sovereignty, promoting one world governance and improving big fish multinationals stranglehold by destroying smaller business competitors. That is some serious tinfoil stuff there mate :lol: Not even the bold part. It's solely scare tactics. Absolutely nothing to show evidence wise except your own head in the sand, keep muh guns taking our jerbs opinion.
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
tbitm wrote: Dunno man, its been pretty cold here in Melbourne Weather =/= climate. When are you guys going to accept that?
|
|
|
tbitm
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Dunno man, its been pretty cold here in Melbourne
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
Unshackled
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 241,
Visits: 0
|
paladisious wrote:The Guardian wrote:[size=6]Exxon knew of climate change in 1981, email says – but it funded deniers for 27 more years[/size] [size=9]Suzanne Goldenberg[/size], US environment correspondent Thursday 9 July 2015 06.41 AEST
A newly unearthed missive from [size=9]Lenny Bernstein[/size], a climate expert with the oil firm for 30 years, shows concerns over high presence of carbon dioxide in enormous gas field in south-east Asia factored into decision not to tap it
ExxonMobil, the world’s biggest oil company, knew as early as 1981 of climate change – seven years before it became a public issue, according to a newly discovered email from one of the firm’s own scientists. Despite this the firm spent millions over the next 27 years to promote climate denial.
The email from Exxon’s in-house climate expert provides evidence the company was aware of the connection between fossil fuels and climate change, and the potential for carbon-cutting regulations that could hurt its bottom line, over a generation ago – factoring that knowledge into its decision about an enormous gas field in south-east Asia. The field, off the coast of Indonesia, would have been the single largest source of global warming pollution at the time. Full article and email in sauce. Edited by paladisious: 9/7/2015 10:38:00 AM You will find a great number of 'gods chosen' pushing for climate change revolution and benefiting from positions of power and financial gain from it, much like they have done in the past with communism. I find it interesting that a lot of climate change policy revolves around nations relinquishing their sovereignty, promoting one world governance and improving big fish multinationals stranglehold by destroying smaller business competitors.
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:Quote:Polar bears are unable to adapt their behaviour to cope with the food losses associated with warmer summers in the Arctic. Scientists had believed that the animals would enter a type of 'walking hibernation' when deprived of prey. But new research says that that bears simply starve in hotter conditions when food is scarce. The authors say that the implications for the survival of the species in a warmer world are grim. Back in 2008 polar bears were listed as a threatened species in the US. At that time, the Secretary of the Interior noted that the dramatic decline in sea ice was the greatest threat the bears faced. http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-33551569 Thanks for the new info Andrew.
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Quote:Polar bears are unable to adapt their behaviour to cope with the food losses associated with warmer summers in the Arctic. Scientists had believed that the animals would enter a type of 'walking hibernation' when deprived of prey. But new research says that that bears simply starve in hotter conditions when food is scarce. The authors say that the implications for the survival of the species in a warmer world are grim. Back in 2008 polar bears were listed as a threatened species in the US. At that time, the Secretary of the Interior noted that the dramatic decline in sea ice was the greatest threat the bears faced. http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-33551569
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Ah the Guardian, the modern day Daily Worker. Wow it's actually quite easy to be a right wing troll. No wonder some of them have thousands of posts of nothing :lol:
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
The Guardian wrote:[size=6]Exxon knew of climate change in 1981, email says – but it funded deniers for 27 more years[/size] Suzanne Goldenberg, US environment correspondent Thursday 9 July 2015 06.41 AEST
A newly unearthed missive from Lenny Bernstein, a climate expert with the oil firm for 30 years, shows concerns over high presence of carbon dioxide in enormous gas field in south-east Asia factored into decision not to tap it
ExxonMobil, the world’s biggest oil company, knew as early as 1981 of climate change – seven years before it became a public issue, according to a newly discovered email from one of the firm’s own scientists. Despite this the firm spent millions over the next 27 years to promote climate denial.
The email from Exxon’s in-house climate expert provides evidence the company was aware of the connection between fossil fuels and climate change, and the potential for carbon-cutting regulations that could hurt its bottom line, over a generation ago – factoring that knowledge into its decision about an enormous gas field in south-east Asia. The field, off the coast of Indonesia, would have been the single largest source of global warming pollution at the time. Full article and email in sauce. Edited by paladisious: 9/7/2015 10:38:00 AM
|
|
|
Buggalugs - you should...
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.3K,
Visits: 0
|
u4486662 wrote:Buggalugs - you should have listened... wrote:Glenn - A-league Mad wrote:Buggalugs - you should have listened... wrote:Glenn - A-league Mad wrote:benelsmore wrote:Unshackled isn't Notor. Notor would have turned this into something about Climate Change being a result feminism. :lol: :d :lol: :d :lol: :d We should Teach climates not to change. No, but only if Climates really really want to change Good point, but I have just developed a new toe nail polish that detects if a climate has changed. If you're getting new toes, it's not climate change that's caused it. What if the climate deep down felt cold but was unfortunately born hot? Can it still change? I believe so. Not Tax-payer funded though
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Buggalugs - you should have listened... wrote:Glenn - A-league Mad wrote:Buggalugs - you should have listened... wrote:Glenn - A-league Mad wrote:benelsmore wrote:Unshackled isn't Notor. Notor would have turned this into something about Climate Change being a result feminism. :lol: :d :lol: :d :lol: :d We should Teach climates not to change. No, but only if Climates really really want to change Good point, but I have just developed a new toe nail polish that detects if a climate has changed. If you're getting new toes, it's not climate change that's caused it. What if the climate deep down felt cold but was unfortunately born hot? Can it still change? I believe so.
|
|
|
Buggalugs - you should...
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Glenn - A-league Mad wrote:Buggalugs - you should have listened... wrote:Glenn - A-league Mad wrote:benelsmore wrote:Unshackled isn't Notor. Notor would have turned this into something about Climate Change being a result feminism. :lol: :d :lol: :d :lol: :d We should Teach climates not to change. No, but only if Climates really really want to change Good point, but I have just developed a new toe nail polish that detects if a climate has changed. If you're getting new toes, it's not climate change that's caused it.
|
|
|
Glenn - A-league Mad
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Buggalugs - you should have listened... wrote:Glenn - A-league Mad wrote:benelsmore wrote:Unshackled isn't Notor. Notor would have turned this into something about Climate Change being a result feminism. :lol: :d :lol: :d :lol: :d We should Teach climates not to change. No, but only if Climates really really want to change Good point, but I have just developed a new toe nail polish that detects if a climate has changed.
|
|
|
Buggalugs - you should...
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Glenn - A-league Mad wrote:benelsmore wrote:Unshackled isn't Notor. Notor would have turned this into something about Climate Change being a result feminism. :lol: :d :lol: :d :lol: :d We should Teach climates not to change. No, but only if Climates really really want to change
|
|
|
Glenn - A-league Mad
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.2K,
Visits: 0
|
benelsmore wrote:Unshackled isn't Notor. Notor would have turned this into something about Climate Change being a result feminism. :lol: :d :lol: :d :lol: :d We should Teach climates not to change.
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Unshackled isn't Notor. Notor would have turned this into something about Climate Change being a result feminism.
|
|
|
Unshackled
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 241,
Visits: 0
|
Munrubenmuz wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:Yeah that aint notor . Unshackled isnt notor either but whatever man . Saying something over and over doesn't make it true.
|
|
|
Unshackled
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 241,
Visits: 0
|
Munrubenmuz wrote:mcjules wrote:Unshackled wrote:mcjules wrote:Yeah Unshackled is very obviously not Notor but also very obviously a multi which is against forum rules. Incorrect, I am not a multi. That would be hypocritical. I have principles. :lol: I don't accept technicalities such as: * My old account is banned * I don't use my old account any more * some other variation of this Couldn't care less if your new account is banned or not but I think you'd be hard pressed to find someone that doesn't recognise you as a multi. :-$ Say whatever you want. You're as transparent as pane of glass. You've given yourself away more than once and for someone who's supposedly a "noob" you don't seem to mind putting the boot into blokes that, wait for it, you've had ongoing wars with before. That and the use of particular insults unique to you that no one on here is retarded enough to use. And that's saying something. You're not fooling anyone. How's your 12 year old girl from Adelaide persona going? Haven't seen "her" post for a while. You guys are just taking the piss now, surely. :lol:
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:Well it isnt. Let your hatred of notor go man its not healthy . Edited by MUNRUBENMUZ: 5/7/2015 12:49:13 PM
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Well it isnt. Let your hatred of notor go man its not healthy
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:Yeah that aint notor . Unshackled isnt notor either but whatever man . Saying something over and over doesn't make it true.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: -PB
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Yeah that aint notor . Unshackled isnt notor either but whatever man .
|
|
|