ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Munrubenmuz wrote:ricecrackers wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:Calm down. It's one and two line replies. (I've long given up researching and posting huge arguments and rebuttals to Crackers.) since your MH370 embarrassment where you were so sure the doppler effect would find the plane and you still cant admit you were duped by charlatans there as you have been on the climate alarmist agenda Remind me again where you think it is Tin (foil hat) Man? Over in world events though. Try to stay on message here. i've no idea, probably crashed en route you're the tinfoil hat wearer to believe it ended up near Perth if you're going to make generalising comments, well two can play at that game so dont try and set ground rules for me
|
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
benelsmore wrote:afromanGT wrote: What a surprise that as usual you've got nothing constructive to say so you resort to playing the man and hanging shit on people.
:lol: Irony..... I think it's more unadulterated hypocrisy than irony, really.
|
|
|
Jong Gabe
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:you drones have nothing left, not even your pride you have a vagina
E
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:benelsmore wrote:afromanGT wrote: What a surprise that as usual you've got nothing constructive to say so you resort to playing the man and hanging shit on people.
:lol: Irony..... I think it's more unadulterated hypocrisy than irony, really. Tu Quoque. You play the man constantly.
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
GabMVFC wrote:ricecrackers wrote:you drones have nothing left, not even your pride you have a vagina i'd like a vagina.....
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:GabMVFC wrote:ricecrackers wrote:you drones have nothing left, not even your pride you have a vagina i'd like a vagina..... I wouldn't be able to play the man then.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:GabMVFC wrote:ricecrackers wrote:you drones have nothing left, not even your pride you have a vagina i'd like a vagina..... There's an operation for that, I hear.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
Can't believe discussions like this can go on so long...
Something like 97% of scientists agree on global warming. Pretty easy to see where the real knowledge on the subject is headed.
Then again... There are many who will still argue against evolution and that's something like 99.5% of scientists support!
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:Can't believe discussions like this can go on so long...
Something like 97% of scientists agree on global warming. Pretty easy to see where the real knowledge on the subject is headed.
Then again... There are many who will still argue against evolution and that's something like 99.5% of scientists support! [youtube]TTOla3TyfqQ[/youtube]
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:Can't believe discussions like this can go on so long...
[size=8]Something like 97% of scientists agree on global warming.[/size] Pretty easy to see where the real knowledge on the subject is headed.
Then again... There are many who will still argue against evolution and that's something like 99.5% of scientists support! completely false assertion
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Awww yus, ricey is back. Time to restart this entire thread. inb4 ITS A FALLACY. -PB
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:Benjamin wrote:Can't believe discussions like this can go on so long...
[size=8]Something like 97% of scientists agree on global warming.[/size] Pretty easy to see where the real knowledge on the subject is headed.
Then again... There are many who will still argue against evolution and that's something like 99.5% of scientists support! completely false assertion If you heard that 97% of people believed that a bridge couldn't sustain the weight of the car you're driving would you still drive over it?
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:Benjamin wrote:Can't believe discussions like this can go on so long...
[size=8]Something like 97% of scientists agree on global warming.[/size] Pretty easy to see where the real knowledge on the subject is headed.
Then again... There are many who will still argue against evolution and that's something like 99.5% of scientists support! completely false assertion If you heard that 97% of people believed that a bridge couldn't sustain the weight of the car you're driving would you still drive over it? stop it with your stupid non sequiturs. you never learn the assertion that 97% of scientists agree on global warming is patently false Edited by ricecrackers: 28/8/2014 07:02:02 PM
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:Benjamin wrote:Can't believe discussions like this can go on so long...
[size=8]Something like 97% of scientists agree on global warming.[/size] Pretty easy to see where the real knowledge on the subject is headed.
Then again... There are many who will still argue against evolution and that's something like 99.5% of scientists support! completely false assertion If you heard that 97% of people believed that a bridge couldn't sustain the weight of the car you're driving would you still drive over it? stop it with your stupid non sequiturs. you never learn the assertion that 97% of scientists agree on global warming is patently false Edited by ricecrackers: 28/8/2014 07:02:02 PM And the assertion that 97% of people believing that a bridge isn't stable is also patently false. However if you heard that you wouldn't drive over the bridge. So why are you arguing against the global warming premise?
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:Benjamin wrote:Can't believe discussions like this can go on so long...
[size=8]Something like 97% of scientists agree on global warming.[/size] Pretty easy to see where the real knowledge on the subject is headed.
Then again... There are many who will still argue against evolution and that's something like 99.5% of scientists support! completely false assertion If you heard that 97% of people believed that a bridge couldn't sustain the weight of the car you're driving would you still drive over it? stop it with your stupid non sequiturs. you never learn the assertion that 97% of scientists agree on global warming is patently false Edited by ricecrackers: 28/8/2014 07:02:02 PM And the assertion that 97% of people believing that a bridge isn't stable is also patently false. However if you heard that you wouldn't drive over the bridge. So why are you arguing against the global warming premise? you want to play that game, i'm certain i could find a consensus of 97% of people who'd advise you to jump off the gap too does that mean you'll do it?
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:Benjamin wrote:Can't believe discussions like this can go on so long...
[size=8]Something like 97% of scientists agree on global warming.[/size] Pretty easy to see where the real knowledge on the subject is headed.
Then again... There are many who will still argue against evolution and that's something like 99.5% of scientists support! completely false assertion If you heard that 97% of people believed that a bridge couldn't sustain the weight of the car you're driving would you still drive over it? stop it with your stupid non sequiturs. you never learn the assertion that 97% of scientists agree on global warming is patently false Edited by ricecrackers: 28/8/2014 07:02:02 PM And the assertion that 97% of people believing that a bridge isn't stable is also patently false. However if you heard that you wouldn't drive over the bridge. So why are you arguing against the global warming premise? you want to play that game, i'm certain i could find a consensus of 97% of people who'd advise you to jump off the gap too does that mean you'll do it? No, because 97% of people encouraging me to do something conspicuously to my detriment is different to the previous two examples of people being DISCOURAGED from doing something to their detriment. Dumbass.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:Benjamin wrote:Can't believe discussions like this can go on so long...
[size=8]Something like 97% of scientists agree on global warming.[/size] Pretty easy to see where the real knowledge on the subject is headed.
Then again... There are many who will still argue against evolution and that's something like 99.5% of scientists support! completely false assertion If you heard that 97% of people believed that a bridge couldn't sustain the weight of the car you're driving would you still drive over it? stop it with your stupid non sequiturs. you never learn the assertion that 97% of scientists agree on global warming is patently false Edited by ricecrackers: 28/8/2014 07:02:02 PM And the assertion that 97% of people believing that a bridge isn't stable is also patently false. However if you heard that you wouldn't drive over the bridge. So why are you arguing against the global warming premise? you want to play that game, i'm certain i could find a consensus of 97% of people who'd advise you to jump off the gap too does that mean you'll do it? No, because 97% of people encouraging me to do something conspicuously to my detriment is different to the previous two examples of people being DISCOURAGED from doing something to their detriment. [size=9]Dumbass[/size]. who says its to your detriment? thats only your opinion
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
So we'll add "encouraging users to commit suicide" to the list of reasons why you should be permanently banned.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:So we'll add "encouraging users to commit suicide" to the list of reasons why you should be permanently banned. another lie. you cant stop yourself and you're getting more and more desperate. this is a meltdown of epic proportions and you've done it to yourself. all i've done is hold up a mirror. you know we're speaking metaphorically. i'm certain i could find a consensus of 97% of a chosen sample who could advise that such a course of action would save the planet. isnt that the objective here?
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
Yeah, a "meltdown" where you've encouraged another user to commit suicide and hit behind it being 'metaphorical'.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:Yeah, a "meltdown" where you've encouraged another user to commit suicide and hit behind it being 'metaphorical'. you've got some serious issues pal i hope you get the care required but more importantly dont harm anyone else
|
|
|
jlm8695
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
This is 10/10 stuff.
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
The lols.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
you know what people, the cost of heating is far more than the cost of cooling therefore the energy required for artificial heating is far more than artificial cooling and i'd argue a large slice if not the majority of fossil fuel energy used in the world is in the heating process
therefore if all this global warming business is being caused by man's usage of fossil fuels then the problem will solve itself
warmer climate => less heating required => less energy consumed => win for mankind
bring it
|
|
|
433
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Can't argue with that, everybody go home :lol:
|
|
|
Roar #1
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.4K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:you know what people, the cost of heating is far more than the cost of cooling therefore the energy required for artificial heating is far more than artificial cooling and i'd argue a large slice if not the majority of fossil fuel energy used in the world is in the heating process
therefore if all this global warming business is being caused by man's usage of fossil fuels then the problem will solve itself
warmer climate => less heating required => less energy consumed => win for mankind
bring it Sauce
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Dependent on RETs being retained but still great initiative by the state government.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Thoughts on the Greenland calving event? -PB
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
I miss Crackers.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|