"I could have got a better comeback off the girl..."

thank you

You've been sniping a lot the last couple of days champ. The wife ignoring you again? Maybe you should go and tell /r/deadbedrooms about it.

you dont exactly hold the moral high ground on sniping

I'm not sure why you're so obsessed with my marriage and sex life, but I wish you would stick to your own erotic fiction and stay away from my bedroom.

I'm sure you have more fulfilling things to do, like feeding ricecrackers the butthurt tears he craves.

Now now children, play nice... Please

"Nice" is a social construct.

Social constructs are also known as fantastic parts of humanity that allow for a functional and no chaotic society :)

Fuck off

The moderation on this site leaves much to be desired. RC has been banned for a facetious comment, notwithstanding other comparable comments going unpunished.

Case in point; some commentators have accused me of supporting the killing of civilians, as well as being a racist, without proper cause.

Do they not deserve a ban?

difference between saying you support them and saying it's only a matter of time before you do what they do.

RC is a low dog maggot for such a comment and has been treated as such. It was just.

Good of you not to address the substantive questions in my post.

1 - I asked said individual outright whether he/she supported Hamas knowing fully the genocidal, antisemitic, and barbarous program outlined in their charter. Said individual said that he/she did.
2 - You have not addressed the issue of very serious claims being made against me without evidence. What is to stop me going around slandering each and every poster on this forum? There has to be accountability in the form of a retraction or apology.
3 - Look at the quotes in my sig. Are some of these not ban worthy by the same standard used to silence RC?

You aren't listening... It doesn't matter if he supports it, saying he will commit murder is a step to far. It's not my job to address them, but yes it's not ideal. Those claims aren't as bad as what RC said though.

They really aren't ban worthy IMO... Zims quote is completely harmlessly wrong. 11's is just silly,m nothing malicious, Zims last one is probably silly. but in no way malicious. RC's clearly was malicious!


He took it too far, and you know it.

Person A professes support for Organisation A

Organisation A has a manifesto which actively calls for ethnic cleansing, genocide, and is nurtured in Nazi conspiracy theories.

Person B accuses Person A of wanting to commit murder.


Is this unreasonable?

I have no doubt that RC is a malicious prick, but I'm aiming at the principle here. You either apply it to everyone, or to no one.

Look at this brain dead imbecile go. Woe be to your family for their many inadequacies.

Agree.

Glass houses Humbert.

RC is an obvious troll, Zimbos is not. Zimbos has earned the right to be heard and defend his position from disagreement.

The real question is, why are you allowed to hold morally reprehensible ideas and viciously attack those who disagree using faulty logic and extreme fallacies and Zimbos is not?

I'll bite.

1 - Please identify the reprehensible ideas that I hold.
2 - Please link to any fallacious arguments I have made.

1, The idea that 11.mvfc.11s family has "many inadequacies"
2, Refer to #1. Classic Ad Hominem.

The first was a statement of fact. He has evidently received no schooling or instruction of any sort, for which I blame his family. No educated person could come up with a post as comprehensively stupid as that offered above.

Do you see any issues with his post?

For your sake;

"You've openly denigrated Hamas" - As if this were a bad thing.

"...and supported Israel's course of action, justified by Hamas' "provocation" - I require evidence for such a claim. Please link me to the relevant quotes.

"...worthy of a ban by your own logic..." - I have called for no one to be banned. I was questioning the inconsistent application of forum rules.


"..due to Israel's repeated attempt at genocide of the Palestinian people." - I humbly submit that you refrain from using words of which you do not know their meaning. Please look into the precise meaning of genocide, (The Genocide Convention should suffice), and weep in shame.

Edited by humbert: 12/8/2014 05:37:18 PM

ricecrackers has said much worse in the past. What he said about Zimbo was rather tame compared to some other stuff he's said.

Maybe it was a little of the "straw that broke the camel's back."

And, like what Notor said, he's clearly trolling. Are the moderator supposed to tolerate trolling? What are the form rules in this matter?

I'm being genuine as I don't know the answer to this.

Honestly I don't think he is trolling, he just genuinely believes what he is writing.

The difference is that you're drawing your own lines and conclusions here. That's upon you.
On the other hand Ricecrackers flat out made the accusation that Zimbos was murderous and deranged.

The difference is significant.

Poe's Law. I think he's a genuine idiot. The only way that notorganic could state with such certainty that he's a troll is if he is in fact ricecrackers.

Would like to see some consistency.

It's not an unjustified one though, is it?

Yeah, but you're retarded.

Whether your insinuations are justified or not isn't the discussion at hand. You're making a point based around a series of details which you referenced. Ricecrackers made an accusation based around nothing more than him being muslim. That's not on.

No. Ricecrackers was well aware of Zim's affinity for Islamism. All of this is in the CAH thread.

Omg how have I missed the last few days of this thread :lol: