Bernie has absolutely hammered her on her Wall st ties, continuously asks her to release the transcripts to her speeches to Wall st banks in which she was paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for, not in campaign funds, straight into her pocket. This message should especially resonate in NY as well as attacking Hillary's support of the Panama free trade deal.

The email scandal is a taxpayer attack campaign against her. Tonnes of politicians used their personal emails for work use and they've had several investigations and found nothing.

But yes I do see Trump bringing up Monica :lol:

Edited by tbitm: 13/4/2016 08:02:19 PM

Agree, if Trump gets the nom, he will go scorched earth of Hillary. She has sooo much baggage it's not even funny.

She's establishment as it gets and yet she still hasn't put away a 72 year old self confessed socialist.

yes, because the goal is also about the party winning ..Bernie is a party man, he just on the left of the party

Trump (by all the talk) campaign has been very unprofessiona, very disorganized

Very interesting article - now we know what the number ranges are. From what I have seen most predictions are that he will end up right around that 1,000 - 1,100 zone.

that just one guys view that Trump could pick them up....what i read, is how bad Trump is doing in picking them up, and Trump has even lost delegates that was voted to him

Hillary Clinton rakes in Verizon cash from a $225K speech while Bernie Sanders supports company’s striking workers.

Amazing contrast.

One will say anything to get elected, another will say what he thinks is right (even though I dont agree with a lot of it)

why the fuck would you support lazy cunts on strike?

Bernie/Shillary debate today was pretty good

Yep, I counted at least 4 times that the crowd booed Hillary.

The way she dodged question on her Goldman Sachs speech transcripts :oops:

There was one moment that summed up Clinton and her fans perfectly for me: she was preaching something and messed up her words when the timer was low, saying something that made no sense and STILL 20% of the crowd cheered despite the fact that she just said complete nervous jibberish

:lol:

Has 11.MVFC.11 started hanging out with edgy 4channers?

Where else will he find his dank memes

"I'm surprised you found out about it" - well, your PR team did ring the paper Donald.

I'll pile on with the dank memes.



Shamelessly got it from the_donald sub.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/clinton-is-winning-the-states-that-look-like-the-democratic-party/

For those who just can't cope with the fact that Clinton is clearly beating Sanders.

I'm sure the usual crowd will still find a way to deny statistical facts though.

New York today, should be a big Trump win. Might even get 100% of the 95 delegates, although more likely he will miss out on a few.

I thought it's winner takes all on the GOP side?

Not exactly winner take all in NY for the repub primary - its not proportional like the Dem vote. But they allocate some delegates by congressional district, so there may be specific geographical areas where he doesn't get enough of the vote for all the delegates.

Trump and Clinton both take New York.

Republican New York Primary is winner takes all if winner gets 50% state wide or 50% in each of the 27 congressional districts. Trump looks to be getting 50% is almost all the CDs. It looks like Kasich will get a delegate each of the 10th and 12th CDs. Perhaps another one or two elsewhere but 90+ delegates for Trump is looking almost certain.

Edited by Drunken_Fish: 20/4/2016 11:59:36 AM

Democratic Primary info from: http://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/new-york-primary-presidential-election-2016/?ex_cid=promo_banner

"The Democratic exit poll — which has been re-calibrated to reflect Clinton’s larger-than-expected margin of victory — now has her winning 75 percent of the black vote in New York, along with 63 percent of the Hispanic vote. Clinton and Sanders split the white vote in New York almost evenly".

"Recently, we’ve seen a slew of national polls showing Clinton and Sanders nearly tied. Those didn’t square in my mind with the statewide polls showing comfortable Clinton leads in states like California, New York and Pennsylvania. Well, it seems in New York that the statewide polls were nearly perfect. Our polling average showed Clinton with a 13.5 percentage point lead. Right now, she’s up 18 percentage points and that should fall a little bit as more of the vote outside the New York City metropolitan area is reported".

"Clinton’s chances of becoming the next president are now 71.4 percent, according to Betfair, the highest she’s been at any point of the election cycle".

"After tonight, Sanders would have to win California by almost 20 points, and Pennsylvania and New Jersey by around 10 points, to eventually claim the majority of pledged delegates. Even though Sanders has made up ground with Clinton over the course of the campaign, results like those would be quite a shock".

Info regarding potential presidential match-ups from http://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/new-york-primary-presidential-election-2016/?ex_cid=promo_banner

"Today’s wins raised Trump’s probability of becoming the Republican nominee and preserved Clinton’s status as odds-on favorite to win the Democratic nomination. That means the probability of a matchup between the two of them in November rose, too. And in polls asking voters nationally about that hypothetical matchup, Clinton consistently is beating Trump, by an average of about 9 points. She has led Trump in each of the last 44 polls compiled by HuffPost Pollster, going back to mid-February. That’s one reason betting markets think the Democratic candidate has about a 74 percent chance of winning the White House.

Kasich uses his consistent advantage over Clinton in hypothetical general-election polls to make the case for his nomination.

General-election polls don’t tell us much before the candidates are set. They probably tell us more, though, about would-be candidates as well-known nationally as Trump and Clinton than they do about candidates with a lower national profile, like Kasich".

89 or 90 delegates for Trump in New York. 5 or 6 to Kasich, 0 to Cruz.

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/feb/17/central-park-five-donald-trump-jogger-rape-case-new-york

Donald Trump Could Go to Prison for 3 Years Because of His Plane


But of course he won't.

By Matt Miller
Apr 19, 2016

We all have to deal with bureaucratic annoyances. We pay our taxes, we replace our expired licenses, we register to vote. Even billionaire, curiously-hued presidential candidates do these boring tasks, right? Not if you're Donald Trump.

The New York Times reports that Trump's Cessna has been flying all over the campaign trail with an expired registration:


Records kept with the Federal Aviation Administration show the aircraft's registration lapsed on Jan. 31. Laura J. Brown, a spokeswoman for the Federal Aviation Administration, confirmed that the plane's registration was not in good standing and said the owner had not renewed it.


Think of it this way: you probably don't have your own jet, but if you got pulled over in your car with expired registration, you'd get in trouble! Now, a plane is a far more regulated and intense means of transportation. However, since marginalizing entire races and genders somehow hasn't ended Trump's campaign, flying with an unregistered plane certainly won't. But he could still get in some trouble:


The F.A.A. could also fine or assess other penalties against the owner and/or operator; Mr. Trump owns the plane through a limited liability company. Though it is unlikely that the F.A.A. would seek the maximum penalty, flying with no registration could result in a civil penalty of up to $27,500, a criminal fine of up to $250,000 and imprisonment for up to three years, the agency said.

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/news/a44128/donald-trump-plane-not-registered/

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Next up we'll be relying on Salon for our political coverage :lol:

Tbf they are just reporting on the story originally from the NY Times.

Are we getting the news from hairdressers?