mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xI know when the election is going to be called. But anyway, anyone planning to vote for Shotchanged, is just got to have rocks in their head! There's an unanswered question at the top of the page that you have failed to address. Just letting you know that we haven't forgotten about that. oh the bit about him being un Christian. The philanderer and all that. That is easily answered. I didn't know you were waiting. You should have said so... As Christians, we are unable to judge Trump, you or anyone else. All we can do is forgive and love everyone, including Trump, you and anyone else as equals and our brothers in Christ. He does not discriminate between me, you or Trump. Trump, and each one of us will need to answer to our shortcomings one day. We will all be judged by the higher authority. But Trumps opponents are even less Christian, and whilst we can't judge them either, they do support Euthanasia, Abortions, Gay marriage, and other stuff so we need to make decisions based on our beliefs and morals. What a load of horse shit. In essence you are saying that I could be a child raping sodomite and you wouldn't hold that against me because you agree with my politics !? Because ummm 'who are we to judge'. Have I got that right? A complete and utter bunch of arse. You are an A-grade fool and a B-grade troll. No I never said that! You are being stupid. If you were a child rapist and sodomite, I would hold it against you alright. There is nothing at all more despicable than that. But Trump is no child rapist or molester, so what is your point. At worst, Trump did what many blokes have done before. He committed adultery, just like Clinton and probably millions of other married guys around the world. Yes, it is against God's Law, but hardly the same with raping a child or raping anyone. At lest the 2 adults were consenting and of legal age. I told you I would vote the politician which I believe holds true to the same christian values, ethics and morality that I believe in. And the politician that fit that bill, was Trump. He is anti Abortion, anti same sex marriage and anti Euthanasia for a start. So was Hillary (before it was fashionable to be in favor of it) and so was Obama when first elected. I don't recall Trump being against it any time on the campaign trail or since he was elected though? True! In fact Trump is closed lipped about SSM. I just assumed because he is very much in step with the Bible Belt which are more likely to vote for the GOP. Hillary and Clinton are liars, fence sitters and hypocrites, and there is nothing worse than that!
|
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+xLiterally whinges about the decline of Western civilization and then tacitly and explicitly dismisses abhorrent behaviour that would get you sacked from any job in the world. (If not arrested.) Olympic class mental gymnastics on display here. Not at all. Grabbing someone on the crotch, assuming it’s true and he did that to begin with really isn’t a criminal matter if it’s consensual. If the person continued after being told to stop or ended up raping, then yes, it’s criminal.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xHe literally admitted to grabbing a woman on the crotch! So what? That's no crime. If it was, virtually every male will be on charges. Wow. Are you seriously saying that grabbing someone’s crotch without consent isn’t a crime? I think he is. I'm no lawyer but that's sexual assault. I'm not sure who Aikhme socialises with but unless I'm getting amorous I've never grabbed a random girl by her genitals. Well if you spoke to a lawyer, you would know there isn’t a case to answer since there is no complainant, evidence, we don’t even know if it’s true as he could be just bragging, and even if it is true then maybe the recipient wanted the advance and it was consensual. I don’t even even know who the other guy is.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xHe literally admitted to grabbing a woman on the crotch! So what? That's no crime. If it was, virtually every male will be on charges. Wow. Are you seriously saying that grabbing someone’s crotch without consent isn’t a crime? Who said it was without consent? There have been no charges and that isn't from lack of trying either. He did when he said “I don’t even wait” and “when you’re a star, they let you get away with it”. Trump has been known to settle cases so it’s likely that this has happened here. No he didn’t! I would just call that an aggressive advance. If the recipient disclosed displeasure, then you STOP. If not, then ok. Otherwise, a simple kiss can be taken as sexual assault. No, that is 100% sexual assault.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xHe literally admitted to grabbing a woman on the crotch! So what? That's no crime. If it was, virtually every male will be on charges. Wow. Are you seriously saying that grabbing someone’s crotch without consent isn’t a crime? Who said it was without consent? There have been no charges and that isn't from lack of trying either. He did when he said “I don’t even wait” and “when you’re a star, they let you get away with it”. Trump has been known to settle cases so it’s likely that this has happened here. No he didn’t! I would just call that an aggressive advance. If the recipient disclosed displeasure, then you STOP. If not, then ok. Otherwise, a simple kiss can be taken as sexual assault. No, that is 100% sexual assault. No it's not, because he hasn't been charged. If it was 100% sexual assault, he would be answering to those crimes.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHe literally admitted to grabbing a woman on the crotch! So what? That's no crime. If it was, virtually every male will be on charges. Wow. Are you seriously saying that grabbing someone’s crotch without consent isn’t a crime? Who said it was without consent? There have been no charges and that isn't from lack of trying either. He did when he said “I don’t even wait” and “when you’re a star, they let you get away with it”. Trump has been known to settle cases so it’s likely that this has happened here. No he didn’t! I would just call that an aggressive advance. If the recipient disclosed displeasure, then you STOP. If not, then ok. Otherwise, a simple kiss can be taken as sexual assault. No, that is 100% sexual assault. No it's not, because he hasn't been charged. If it was 100% sexual assault, he would be answering to those crimes. This is so wrong. If he doesn't get charged or he settles the case, it's still sexual assault. I have a friend who was the victim of an attempted rape but she didn't press charges. Try telling her that she wasn't sexually assaulted.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHe literally admitted to grabbing a woman on the crotch! So what? That's no crime. If it was, virtually every male will be on charges. Wow. Are you seriously saying that grabbing someone’s crotch without consent isn’t a crime? Who said it was without consent? There have been no charges and that isn't from lack of trying either. He did when he said “I don’t even wait” and “when you’re a star, they let you get away with it”. Trump has been known to settle cases so it’s likely that this has happened here. No he didn’t! I would just call that an aggressive advance. If the recipient disclosed displeasure, then you STOP. If not, then ok. Otherwise, a simple kiss can be taken as sexual assault. No, that is 100% sexual assault. No it's not, because he hasn't been charged. If it was 100% sexual assault, he would be answering to those crimes. This is so wrong. If he doesn't get charged or he settles the case, it's still sexual assault. I have a friend who was the victim of an attempted rape but she didn't press charges. Try telling her that she wasn't sexually assaulted. There was no case. No one ever came forward complaining that her crotch was grabbed. And there is no sexual assault if it was consensual.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHe literally admitted to grabbing a woman on the crotch! So what? That's no crime. If it was, virtually every male will be on charges. Wow. Are you seriously saying that grabbing someone’s crotch without consent isn’t a crime? Who said it was without consent? There have been no charges and that isn't from lack of trying either. He did when he said “I don’t even wait” and “when you’re a star, they let you get away with it”. Trump has been known to settle cases so it’s likely that this has happened here. No he didn’t! I would just call that an aggressive advance. If the recipient disclosed displeasure, then you STOP. If not, then ok. Otherwise, a simple kiss can be taken as sexual assault. No, that is 100% sexual assault. No it's not, because he hasn't been charged. If it was 100% sexual assault, he would be answering to those crimes. This is so wrong. If he doesn't get charged or he settles the case, it's still sexual assault. I have a friend who was the victim of an attempted rape but she didn't press charges. Try telling her that she wasn't sexually assaulted. There was no case. No one ever came forward complaining that her crotch was grabbed. And there is no sexual assault if it was consensual. There were women who came forward and Trump himself said it wasn't consensual. "I grab her by the pussy, I don't even wait." " And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything"
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHe literally admitted to grabbing a woman on the crotch! So what? That's no crime. If it was, virtually every male will be on charges. Wow. Are you seriously saying that grabbing someone’s crotch without consent isn’t a crime? Who said it was without consent? There have been no charges and that isn't from lack of trying either. He did when he said “I don’t even wait” and “when you’re a star, they let you get away with it”. Trump has been known to settle cases so it’s likely that this has happened here. No he didn’t! I would just call that an aggressive advance. If the recipient disclosed displeasure, then you STOP. If not, then ok. Otherwise, a simple kiss can be taken as sexual assault. No, that is 100% sexual assault. No it's not, because he hasn't been charged. If it was 100% sexual assault, he would be answering to those crimes. This is so wrong. If he doesn't get charged or he settles the case, it's still sexual assault. I have a friend who was the victim of an attempted rape but she didn't press charges. Try telling her that she wasn't sexually assaulted. There was no case. No one ever came forward complaining that her crotch was grabbed. And there is no sexual assault if it was consensual. There were women who came forward and Trump himself said it wasn't consensual. "I grab her by the pussy, I don't even wait." " And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything" There was only one woman and she didn't complain about being grabbed on the crotch. And from Trump's quote, he wasn't talking about Stormy Daniels. He was talking about consensual acts. That's what he means by "they let you do it". Therefore, he is implying he wouldn't do it if they didn't let him.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHe literally admitted to grabbing a woman on the crotch! So what? That's no crime. If it was, virtually every male will be on charges. Wow. Are you seriously saying that grabbing someone’s crotch without consent isn’t a crime? Who said it was without consent? There have been no charges and that isn't from lack of trying either. He did when he said “I don’t even wait” and “when you’re a star, they let you get away with it”. Trump has been known to settle cases so it’s likely that this has happened here. No he didn’t! I would just call that an aggressive advance. If the recipient disclosed displeasure, then you STOP. If not, then ok. Otherwise, a simple kiss can be taken as sexual assault. No, that is 100% sexual assault. No it's not, because he hasn't been charged. If it was 100% sexual assault, he would be answering to those crimes. This is so wrong. If he doesn't get charged or he settles the case, it's still sexual assault. I have a friend who was the victim of an attempted rape but she didn't press charges. Try telling her that she wasn't sexually assaulted. There was no case. No one ever came forward complaining that her crotch was grabbed. And there is no sexual assault if it was consensual. There were women who came forward and Trump himself said it wasn't consensual. "I grab her by the pussy, I don't even wait." " And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything" There was only one woman and she didn't complain about being grabbed on the crotch. And from Trump's quote, he wasn't talking about Stormy Daniels. He was talking about consensual acts. That's what he means by "they let you do it" No, there have been at least 19 women who have made accusations against him (it's likely that he's done it to more women who haven't came forward publicly) He groped one of those women on the crotch and tried to put his hand up others skirts. He has groped other women on the breast and ass as well. He definitely wasn't talking about consensual acts. He was talking about groping women and being able to get away with it because of his wealth and celebrity status.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHe literally admitted to grabbing a woman on the crotch! So what? That's no crime. If it was, virtually every male will be on charges. Wow. Are you seriously saying that grabbing someone’s crotch without consent isn’t a crime? Who said it was without consent? There have been no charges and that isn't from lack of trying either. He did when he said “I don’t even wait” and “when you’re a star, they let you get away with it”. Trump has been known to settle cases so it’s likely that this has happened here. No he didn’t! I would just call that an aggressive advance. If the recipient disclosed displeasure, then you STOP. If not, then ok. Otherwise, a simple kiss can be taken as sexual assault. No, that is 100% sexual assault. No it's not, because he hasn't been charged. If it was 100% sexual assault, he would be answering to those crimes. This is so wrong. If he doesn't get charged or he settles the case, it's still sexual assault. I have a friend who was the victim of an attempted rape but she didn't press charges. Try telling her that she wasn't sexually assaulted. There was no case. No one ever came forward complaining that her crotch was grabbed. And there is no sexual assault if it was consensual. There were women who came forward and Trump himself said it wasn't consensual. "I grab her by the pussy, I don't even wait." " And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything" There was only one woman and she didn't complain about being grabbed on the crotch. And from Trump's quote, he wasn't talking about Stormy Daniels. He was talking about consensual acts. That's what he means by "they let you do it" No, there have been at least 19 women who have made accusations against him (it's likely that he's done it to more women who haven't came forward publicly) He groped one of those women on the crotch and tried to put his hand up others skirts. He has groped other women on the breast and ass as well. He definitely wasn't talking about consensual acts. He was talking about groping women and being able to get away with it because of his wealth and celebrity status. 19 women hey? Where is the evidence? There were plenty of women that were caught with their pants down (pun intended) You can make all kinds of claims but why are none in court? Why have there been no charges laid? Just another Russian hoax I suppose? You people love making fools of yourselves. How is Trump's impeachment going? LOL The only thing certain here is that Trump will get another term. :)
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHe literally admitted to grabbing a woman on the crotch! So what? That's no crime. If it was, virtually every male will be on charges. Wow. Are you seriously saying that grabbing someone’s crotch without consent isn’t a crime? Who said it was without consent? There have been no charges and that isn't from lack of trying either. He did when he said “I don’t even wait” and “when you’re a star, they let you get away with it”. Trump has been known to settle cases so it’s likely that this has happened here. No he didn’t! I would just call that an aggressive advance. If the recipient disclosed displeasure, then you STOP. If not, then ok. Otherwise, a simple kiss can be taken as sexual assault. No, that is 100% sexual assault. No it's not, because he hasn't been charged. If it was 100% sexual assault, he would be answering to those crimes. This is so wrong. If he doesn't get charged or he settles the case, it's still sexual assault. I have a friend who was the victim of an attempted rape but she didn't press charges. Try telling her that she wasn't sexually assaulted. There was no case. No one ever came forward complaining that her crotch was grabbed. And there is no sexual assault if it was consensual. There were women who came forward and Trump himself said it wasn't consensual. "I grab her by the pussy, I don't even wait." " And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything" There was only one woman and she didn't complain about being grabbed on the crotch. And from Trump's quote, he wasn't talking about Stormy Daniels. He was talking about consensual acts. That's what he means by "they let you do it" No, there have been at least 19 women who have made accusations against him (it's likely that he's done it to more women who haven't came forward publicly) He groped one of those women on the crotch and tried to put his hand up others skirts. He has groped other women on the breast and ass as well. He definitely wasn't talking about consensual acts. He was talking about groping women and being able to get away with it because of his wealth and celebrity status. 19 women hey? Where is the evidence? There were plenty of women that were caught with their pants down (pun intended) You can make all kinds of claims but why are none in court? Why have there been no charges laid? Either Trump has paid them to be quiet, the women don't want the attention or the women don't want to waste their time, energy and money on a court case.
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHe literally admitted to grabbing a woman on the crotch! So what? That's no crime. If it was, virtually every male will be on charges. Wow. Are you seriously saying that grabbing someone’s crotch without consent isn’t a crime? Who said it was without consent? There have been no charges and that isn't from lack of trying either. He did when he said “I don’t even wait” and “when you’re a star, they let you get away with it”. Trump has been known to settle cases so it’s likely that this has happened here. No he didn’t! I would just call that an aggressive advance. If the recipient disclosed displeasure, then you STOP. If not, then ok. Otherwise, a simple kiss can be taken as sexual assault. No, that is 100% sexual assault. No it's not, because he hasn't been charged. If it was 100% sexual assault, he would be answering to those crimes. This is so wrong. If he doesn't get charged or he settles the case, it's still sexual assault. I have a friend who was the victim of an attempted rape but she didn't press charges. Try telling her that she wasn't sexually assaulted. There was no case. No one ever came forward complaining that her crotch was grabbed. And there is no sexual assault if it was consensual. There were women who came forward and Trump himself said it wasn't consensual. "I grab her by the pussy, I don't even wait." " And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything" There was only one woman and she didn't complain about being grabbed on the crotch. And from Trump's quote, he wasn't talking about Stormy Daniels. He was talking about consensual acts. That's what he means by "they let you do it" No, there have been at least 19 women who have made accusations against him (it's likely that he's done it to more women who haven't came forward publicly) He groped one of those women on the crotch and tried to put his hand up others skirts. He has groped other women on the breast and ass as well. He definitely wasn't talking about consensual acts. He was talking about groping women and being able to get away with it because of his wealth and celebrity status. You people love making fools of yourselves. How is Trump's impeachment going? LOL The only thing certain here is that Trump will get another term. :) I think impeachment would be a waste of political capital and you'll end up with Pence who'll do the same policies that Trump's doing except he will actually be competent at doing them. I can't wait to see the egg on your face when Bernie wins the next election and Trump gets indicted as soon as he leaves office.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xHe literally admitted to grabbing a woman on the crotch! So what? That's no crime. If it was, virtually every male will be on charges. Wow. Are you seriously saying that grabbing someone’s crotch without consent isn’t a crime? Who said it was without consent? There have been no charges and that isn't from lack of trying either. He did when he said “I don’t even wait” and “when you’re a star, they let you get away with it”. Trump has been known to settle cases so it’s likely that this has happened here. No he didn’t! I would just call that an aggressive advance. If the recipient disclosed displeasure, then you STOP. If not, then ok. Otherwise, a simple kiss can be taken as sexual assault. No, that is 100% sexual assault. No it's not, because he hasn't been charged. If it was 100% sexual assault, he would be answering to those crimes. This is so wrong. If he doesn't get charged or he settles the case, it's still sexual assault. I have a friend who was the victim of an attempted rape but she didn't press charges. Try telling her that she wasn't sexually assaulted. There was no case. No one ever came forward complaining that her crotch was grabbed. And there is no sexual assault if it was consensual. There were women who came forward and Trump himself said it wasn't consensual. "I grab her by the pussy, I don't even wait." " And when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything" There was only one woman and she didn't complain about being grabbed on the crotch. And from Trump's quote, he wasn't talking about Stormy Daniels. He was talking about consensual acts. That's what he means by "they let you do it" No, there have been at least 19 women who have made accusations against him (it's likely that he's done it to more women who haven't came forward publicly) He groped one of those women on the crotch and tried to put his hand up others skirts. He has groped other women on the breast and ass as well. He definitely wasn't talking about consensual acts. He was talking about groping women and being able to get away with it because of his wealth and celebrity status. You people love making fools of yourselves. How is Trump's impeachment going? LOL The only thing certain here is that Trump will get another term. :) I think impeachment would be a waste of political capital and you'll end up with Pence who'll do the same policies that Trump's doing except he will actually be competent at doing them. I can't wait to see the egg on your face when Bernie wins the next election and Trump gets indicted as soon as he leaves office. I think you guys are a waste of time and just so dumb. Now, because Trump isn’t the evil guy you have all tried to portray and is actually doing a good job, you think impeachment is a waste of time not because you don’t want to impeach him but because you simply can’t impeach him and because he is always 2 steps ahead. Earlier, your mate talked about child rapists and yet he will support Abortion laws. Explain the difference hypocrites, in your alternate PC universe! Most of of you guys are not smart to say the least. That is being very kind.
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Ok no more US politics chat in this thread. Take it over to http://forum.insidesport.com.au/1442530/WorldPoliticsGlobalEventsAny further off topic posts will be deleted.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Right. Back on topic.
It looks like the Shortondetails campaign is starting to ravel and fall apart because Shortfused seems to be very sketchy on details and costings of all his policies.
The public are starting to see through Shortshanked.
ScoMo looks like he has a spring in his step and is making a strong finish.
Shorty looks like he is dead in the water.
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+xRight. Back on topic. It looks like the Shortondetails campaign is starting to ravel and fall apart because Shortfused seems to be very sketchy on details and costings of all his policies. The public are starting to see through Shortshanked. ScoMo looks like he has a spring in his step and is making a strong finish. Shorty looks like he is dead in the water. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 there's being one eyed like rusty but seriously you're a typical stereotype of the lnp Murdoch press reader.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xRight. Back on topic. It looks like the Shortondetails campaign is starting to ravel and fall apart because Shortfused seems to be very sketchy on details and costings of all his policies. The public are starting to see through Shortshanked. ScoMo looks like he has a spring in his step and is making a strong finish. Shorty looks like he is dead in the water. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 there's being one eyed like rusty but seriously you're a typical stereotype of the lnp Murdoch press reader. It's not being one eyed. I actually don't like the Liberals at all. But they are the only viable option I am afraid. Shortfused is going to be a disaster for this country, business and employment. We should all be very worried. In the end, the establishment (Labour and Liberal) are not trustworthy. So it comes down to who can can trust more. And the answer to that question should be very obvious. I just wish we had an anti establishment choice like Trump. We need a game changer in this country too. Look, deep down you know you can't trust Shorthand! The people are now starting to cotton on to this slippery and very shady character that is Shortondetails. ScoMo is far more genuine than Shorty. Even women prefer ScoMo. Women find Shortlisted to be very short on compassion, sincerity, and very long on arrogance.
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xRight. Back on topic. It looks like the Shortondetails campaign is starting to ravel and fall apart because Shortfused seems to be very sketchy on details and costings of all his policies. The public are starting to see through Shortshanked. ScoMo looks like he has a spring in his step and is making a strong finish. Shorty looks like he is dead in the water. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 there's being one eyed like rusty but seriously you're a typical stereotype of the lnp Murdoch press reader. It's not being one eyed. I actually don't like the Liberals at all. But they are the only viable option I am afraid. Shortfused is going to be a disaster for this country, business and employment. We should all be very worried. In the end, the establishment (Labour and Liberal) are not trustworthy. So it comes down to who can can trust more. And the answer to that question should be very obvious. I just wish we had an anti establishment choice like Trump. We need a game changer in this country too. Look, deep down you know you can't trust Shorthand! The people are now starting to cotton on to this slippery and very shady character that is Shortondetails. ScoMo is far more genuine than Shorty. Even women prefer ScoMo. Women find Shortlisted to be very short on compassion, sincerity, and very long on arrogance. 🤣🤣 stop aikhme just stop.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xRight. Back on topic. It looks like the Shortondetails campaign is starting to ravel and fall apart because Shortfused seems to be very sketchy on details and costings of all his policies. The public are starting to see through Shortshanked. ScoMo looks like he has a spring in his step and is making a strong finish. Shorty looks like he is dead in the water. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 there's being one eyed like rusty but seriously you're a typical stereotype of the lnp Murdoch press reader. It's not being one eyed. I actually don't like the Liberals at all. But they are the only viable option I am afraid. Shortfused is going to be a disaster for this country, business and employment. We should all be very worried. In the end, the establishment (Labour and Liberal) are not trustworthy. So it comes down to who can can trust more. And the answer to that question should be very obvious. I just wish we had an anti establishment choice like Trump. We need a game changer in this country too. Look, deep down you know you can't trust Shorthand! The people are now starting to cotton on to this slippery and very shady character that is Shortondetails. ScoMo is far more genuine than Shorty. Even women prefer ScoMo. Women find Shortlisted to be very short on compassion, sincerity, and very long on arrogance. 🤣🤣 stop aikhme just stop. Excuse me! I think you should stop making stupid accusations. Secondly, I wouldn’t laugh if I were you. Everything I said is actually what appears to be occurring right now. Shortfused has a bad image problem and isn’t liked by the majority of women. Funny isn’t it? He is losing ground whilst ScoMo appears more confident, and charismatic. Also, he is very deceptive, does not answer questions, does not divulge the coatings for his policies which have been assessed by an independent auditor. The cost is 340,000 jobs and 470 Billion over the next 10 years. This country will be on its knees. He is also arrogant but what what else do you expect from a standover man? Now let’s see if you have the intelligence to come up with something more than just a childish one liner.
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xRight. Back on topic. It looks like the Shortondetails campaign is starting to ravel and fall apart because Shortfused seems to be very sketchy on details and costings of all his policies. The public are starting to see through Shortshanked. ScoMo looks like he has a spring in his step and is making a strong finish. Shorty looks like he is dead in the water. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 there's being one eyed like rusty but seriously you're a typical stereotype of the lnp Murdoch press reader. It's not being one eyed. I actually don't like the Liberals at all. But they are the only viable option I am afraid. Shortfused is going to be a disaster for this country, business and employment. We should all be very worried. In the end, the establishment (Labour and Liberal) are not trustworthy. So it comes down to who can can trust more. And the answer to that question should be very obvious. I just wish we had an anti establishment choice like Trump. We need a game changer in this country too. Look, deep down you know you can't trust Shorthand! The people are now starting to cotton on to this slippery and very shady character that is Shortondetails. ScoMo is far more genuine than Shorty. Even women prefer ScoMo. Women find Shortlisted to be very short on compassion, sincerity, and very long on arrogance. 🤣🤣 stop aikhme just stop. Excuse me! I think you should stop making stupid accusations. Secondly, I wouldn’t laugh if I were you. Everything I said is actually what appears to be occurring right now. Shortfused has a bad image problem and isn’t liked by the majority of women. Funny isn’t it? He is losing ground whilst ScoMo appears more confident, and charismatic. Also, he is very deceptive, does not answer questions, does not divulge the coatings for his policies which have been assessed by an independent auditor. The cost is 340,000 jobs and 470 Billion over the next 10 years. This country will be on its knees. He is also arrogant but what what else do you expect from a standover man? Now let’s see if you have the intelligence to come up with something more than just a childish one liner. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 dig deeper
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xRight. Back on topic. It looks like the Shortondetails campaign is starting to ravel and fall apart because Shortfused seems to be very sketchy on details and costings of all his policies. The public are starting to see through Shortshanked. ScoMo looks like he has a spring in his step and is making a strong finish. Shorty looks like he is dead in the water. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 there's being one eyed like rusty but seriously you're a typical stereotype of the lnp Murdoch press reader. It's not being one eyed. I actually don't like the Liberals at all. But they are the only viable option I am afraid. Shortfused is going to be a disaster for this country, business and employment. We should all be very worried. In the end, the establishment (Labour and Liberal) are not trustworthy. So it comes down to who can can trust more. And the answer to that question should be very obvious. I just wish we had an anti establishment choice like Trump. We need a game changer in this country too. Look, deep down you know you can't trust Shorthand! The people are now starting to cotton on to this slippery and very shady character that is Shortondetails. ScoMo is far more genuine than Shorty. Even women prefer ScoMo. Women find Shortlisted to be very short on compassion, sincerity, and very long on arrogance. 🤣🤣 stop aikhme just stop. Excuse me! I think you should stop making stupid accusations. Secondly, I wouldn’t laugh if I were you. Everything I said is actually what appears to be occurring right now. Shortfused has a bad image problem and isn’t liked by the majority of women. Funny isn’t it? He is losing ground whilst ScoMo appears more confident, and charismatic. Also, he is very deceptive, does not answer questions, does not divulge the coatings for his policies which have been assessed by an independent auditor. The cost is 340,000 jobs and 470 Billion over the next 10 years. This country will be on its knees. He is also arrogant but what what else do you expect from a standover man? Now let’s see if you have the intelligence to come up with something more than just a childish one liner. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 dig deeper Another pointless one liner! tell me! Do you watch any current affairs? Do you follow the elections? It seems you are clueless. Shortonodds is faultering and is the LNP’s best asset. Shortfused is shortcircuiting before your eyes!
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Can you imagine how embarrassing it will be with Shorthand as PM.
Cringeworthy to to say the least!
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+xCan you imagine how embarrassing it will be with Shorthand as PM. Cringeworthy to to say the least! 🤣🤣 you're trying so hard. You know this is a forum and not Facebook. Why dont you troll the guardian and the age pages 😉😉😉
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xCan you imagine how embarrassing it will be with Shorthand as PM. Cringeworthy to to say the least! 🤣🤣 you're trying so hard. You know this is a forum and not Facebook. Why dont you troll the guardian and the age pages 😉😉😉 Yes thank you so much for your lucid revelation! I know, and I am adding to the political discourse. As for you, well it’s not clear that you are able to add anything but childish one liners!
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xCan you imagine how embarrassing it will be with Shorthand as PM. Cringeworthy to to say the least! 🤣🤣 you're trying so hard. You know this is a forum and not Facebook. Why dont you troll the guardian and the age pages 😉😉😉 Yes thank you so much for your lucid revelation! I know, and I am adding to the political discourse. As for you, well it’s not clear that you are able to add anything but childish one liners! Yawn. Give it up . All you do is post arguments that make no sense . Using childish names for bill shorten which is typical of a troll. What's next trying to look educated by using non sequitars ?? Face it you have nothing besides internet arguments.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xCan you imagine how embarrassing it will be with Shorthand as PM. Cringeworthy to to say the least! 🤣🤣 you're trying so hard. You know this is a forum and not Facebook. Why dont you troll the guardian and the age pages 😉😉😉 Yes thank you so much for your lucid revelation! I know, and I am adding to the political discourse. As for you, well it’s not clear that you are able to add anything but childish one liners! Yawn. Give it up . All you do is post arguments that make no sense . Using childish names for bill shorten which is typical of a troll. What's next trying to look educated by using non sequitars ?? Face it you have nothing besides internet arguments. Why don’t they make sense? They make perfect sense. You just don’t like the sense I make because you are a Lefty. time to mature and start thinking with your head. What I have said is all over the media, including the ABC. Shortdick made a huge fool of himself. You do realize you are on a forum and not on Twitter right?
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xCan you imagine how embarrassing it will be with Shorthand as PM. Cringeworthy to to say the least! 🤣🤣 you're trying so hard. You know this is a forum and not Facebook. Why dont you troll the guardian and the age pages 😉😉😉 Yes thank you so much for your lucid revelation! I know, and I am adding to the political discourse. As for you, well it’s not clear that you are able to add anything but childish one liners! Yawn. Give it up . All you do is post arguments that make no sense . Using childish names for bill shorten which is typical of a troll. What's next trying to look educated by using non sequitars ?? Face it you have nothing besides internet arguments. Why don’t they make sense? They make perfect sense. You just don’t like the sense I make because you are a Lefty. time to mature and start thinking with your head. What I have said is all over the media, including the ABC. Shortdick made a huge fool of himself. You do realize you are on a forum and not on Twitter right? What?? Seriously you think by calling shorten names makes you look childish you're not arguing his points but making it personal which is typical of those who are so ignorant.
|
|
|
mouflonrouge
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xCan you imagine how embarrassing it will be with Shorthand as PM. Cringeworthy to to say the least! 🤣🤣 you're trying so hard. You know this is a forum and not Facebook. Why dont you troll the guardian and the age pages 😉😉😉 Yes thank you so much for your lucid revelation! I know, and I am adding to the political discourse. As for you, well it’s not clear that you are able to add anything but childish one liners! Yawn. Give it up . All you do is post arguments that make no sense . Using childish names for bill shorten which is typical of a troll. What's next trying to look educated by using non sequitars ?? Face it you have nothing besides internet arguments. Why don’t they make sense? They make perfect sense. You just don’t like the sense I make because you are a Lefty. time to mature and start thinking with your head. What I have said is all over the media, including the ABC. Shortdick made a huge fool of himself. You do realize you are on a forum and not on Twitter right? What?? Seriously you think by calling shorten names makes you look childish you're not arguing his points but making it personal which is typical of those who are so ignorant. No of course I don't think calling Shortfused names is going to make a difference. that's just some fun because Shortlisted is a Donkey's Arse! It's also funny. I have added a lot of other substance to my post. I am just trying to debate with others about these elections. They are important elections because Australia is at the crossroads and Shortcircuited is very dangerous for this country and is also a characterless arrogant imbecile. The nicknames are just fun.
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xCan you imagine how embarrassing it will be with Shorthand as PM. Cringeworthy to to say the least! 🤣🤣 you're trying so hard. You know this is a forum and not Facebook. Why dont you troll the guardian and the age pages 😉😉😉 Yes thank you so much for your lucid revelation! I know, and I am adding to the political discourse. As for you, well it’s not clear that you are able to add anything but childish one liners! Yawn. Give it up . All you do is post arguments that make no sense . Using childish names for bill shorten which is typical of a troll. What's next trying to look educated by using non sequitars ?? Face it you have nothing besides internet arguments. Why don’t they make sense? They make perfect sense. You just don’t like the sense I make because you are a Lefty. time to mature and start thinking with your head. What I have said is all over the media, including the ABC. Shortdick made a huge fool of himself. You do realize you are on a forum and not on Twitter right? What?? Seriously you think by calling shorten names makes you look childish you're not arguing his points but making it personal which is typical of those who are so ignorant. No of course I don't think calling Shortfused names is going to make a difference. that's just some fun because Shortlisted is a Donkey's Arse! It's also funny. I have added a lot of other substance to my post. I am just trying to debate with others about these elections. They are important elections because Australia is at the crossroads and Shortcircuited is very dangerous for this country and is also a characterless arrogant imbecile. The nicknames are just fun. Le sigh why do I bother. You're just a typical internet troll who gets his jollies off by trolling anonymously. Pretty sad . You have no interest in politics at all besides telling everyone they're wrong. Typical aikhme
|
|
|