|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xThis is what happens when the league is desperate to expand for Foxtel money and they give a license to some slimy property developers and their lies. One of the more embarrassing moments in the league's history, the sooner they're replaced by Canberra or Wollongong the better. Yep. Same as Macarthur. Kryslovic and Walker are both slimy bastards Krslovic sure is slimy. good post I like it Sydney Croatia fan?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
naabeelahmed12@gmail.com
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3,
Visits: 4
|
+x+x+xThis is what happens when the league is desperate to expand for Foxtel money and they give a license to some slimy property developers and their lies. One of the more embarrassing moments in the league's history, the sooner they're replaced by Canberra or Wollongong the better. Yep. Same as Macarthur. Kryslovic and Walker are both slimy bastards Krslovic sure is slimy. good post I like it
|
|
|
|
|
Paul01
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xThis is what happens when the league is desperate to expand for Foxtel money and they give a license to some slimy property developers and their lies. One of the more embarrassing moments in the league's history, the sooner they're replaced by Canberra or Wollongong the better. Yep. Same as Macarthur. Kryslovic and Walker are both slimy bastards Krslovic sure is slimy. Walker got out so I wonder Krslovic is getting his money for the Spaniards.
|
|
|
|
|
lebo_roo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xThis is what happens when the league is desperate to expand for Foxtel money and they give a license to some slimy property developers and their lies. One of the more embarrassing moments in the league's history, the sooner they're replaced by Canberra or Wollongong the better. Yep. Same as Macarthur. Kryslovic and Walker are both slimy bastards Krslovic sure is slimy.
|
|
|
|
|
Footyball
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xConsidering every Melbourne AFL team plays in the city, it strikes me as something that works for Melburnians. It doesn't work for this Melburnian. WU has a stadium approval now to begin early in 2021, a value capture project, part of an economic stimulous. Should be ready for the following season. It's coming together. And they haven't got permission for the stadium as if yet Yes they have, there was a recent write up about it on 26 Nov by business reporter Daniel Ziffer. Council's director of deals Kate Roffey commented extensively about that project. C'mon whats with the ignorence to the fact that it's happened? Nope. They haven't got permission for the stadium. They got permission for digging not for the purposed stadium. They were given the land for that purpose. It will be done along with the training facilities. Where is your info coming from and I will look it up myself.
|
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xConsidering every Melbourne AFL team plays in the city, it strikes me as something that works for Melburnians. It doesn't work for this Melburnian. WU has a stadium approval now to begin early in 2021, a value capture project, part of an economic stimulous. Should be ready for the following season. It's coming together. And they haven't got permission for the stadium as if yet Yes they have, there was a recent write up about it on 26 Nov by business reporter Daniel Ziffer. Council's director of deals Kate Roffey commented extensively about that project. C'mon whats with the ignorence to the fact that it's happened? Nope. They haven't got permission for the stadium. They got permission for digging not for the purposed stadium.
|
|
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xConsidering every Melbourne AFL team plays in the city, it strikes me as something that works for Melburnians. It doesn't work for this Melburnian. WU has a stadium approval now to begin early in 2021, a value capture project, part of an economic stimulous. Should be ready for the following season. It's coming together. 🤣🤣 what nerve . Asking a mv member and fan to jump to wu Not really dude, Lowey got all the ethnics ( or at least all the shit spineless ones) to jump onboard the original franchises....
|
|
|
|
|
Footyball
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xConsidering every Melbourne AFL team plays in the city, it strikes me as something that works for Melburnians. It doesn't work for this Melburnian. WU has a stadium approval now to begin early in 2021, a value capture project, part of an economic stimulous. Should be ready for the following season. It's coming together. And they haven't got permission for the stadium as if yet Yes they have, there was a recent write up about it on 26 Nov by business reporter Daniel Ziffer. Council's director of deals Kate Roffey commented extensively about that project. C'mon whats with the ignorence to the fact that it's happened?
|
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xConsidering every Melbourne AFL team plays in the city, it strikes me as something that works for Melburnians. It doesn't work for this Melburnian. WU has a stadium approval now to begin early in 2021, a value capture project, part of an economic stimulous. Should be ready for the following season. It's coming together. And they haven't got permission for the stadium as if yet
|
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xConsidering every Melbourne AFL team plays in the city, it strikes me as something that works for Melburnians. It doesn't work for this Melburnian. WU has a stadium approval now to begin early in 2021, a value capture project, part of an economic stimulous. Should be ready for the following season. It's coming together. 🤣🤣 what nerve . Asking a mv member and fan to jump to wu
|
|
|
|
|
Footyball
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xConsidering every Melbourne AFL team plays in the city, it strikes me as something that works for Melburnians. It doesn't work for this Melburnian. WU has a stadium approval now to begin early in 2021, a value capture project, part of an economic stimulous. Should be ready for the following season. It's coming together.
|
|
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
+xConsidering every Melbourne AFL team plays in the city, it strikes me as something that works for Melburnians. It doesn't work for this Melburnian.
|
|
|
|
|
Eldar
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Considering every Melbourne AFL team plays in the city, it strikes me as something that works for Melburnians. It is a hell of a lot better than playing games in suburban AFL stadiums in my opinion. I would have preferred to see them partner with Knights and put some money into suburban grounds but Melbourne at least now has some geographic reference to the teams and hopefully the stadiums to back it in the not too distant future.
Beaten by Eldar
|
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xThis is what happens when the league is desperate to expand for Foxtel money and they give a license to some slimy property developers and their lies. One of the more embarrassing moments in the league's history, the sooner they're replaced by Canberra or Wollongong the better. Yep. Same as Macarthur. Kryslovic and Walker are both slimy bastards At least Macarthur have a proper stadium in an established region. WU don’t... What gets me is that they train in Caroline Springs on the Georgies ground. There's plenty of clubs in Wyndham that they could've partnered with. Hoppers crossing s.c werribee city , truganina hornets, pt Cook jets. Et al
|
|
|
|
|
aussie pride
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xThis is what happens when the league is desperate to expand for Foxtel money and they give a license to some slimy property developers and their lies. One of the more embarrassing moments in the league's history, the sooner they're replaced by Canberra or Wollongong the better. Yep. Same as Macarthur. Kryslovic and Walker are both slimy bastards At least Macarthur have a proper stadium in an established region. WU don’t...
|
|
|
|
|
Paul01
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThis is what happens when the league is desperate to expand for Foxtel money and they give a license to some slimy property developers and their lies. One of the more embarrassing moments in the league's history, the sooner they're replaced by Canberra or Wollongong the better. Yep. Same as Macarthur. Kryslovic and Walker are both slimy bastards
|
|
|
|
|
karta
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 567,
Visits: 0
|
This is what happens when the league is desperate to expand for Foxtel money and they give a license to some slimy property developers and their lies.
One of the more embarrassing moments in the league's history, the sooner they're replaced by Canberra or Wollongong the better.
|
|
|
|
|
melbourne_terrace
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xWonder what the afc will say?? Nothing. It has nothing to do with them - it’s a domestic competition. Sure thing. It's also a complete coincidence that our current season length of 26 league games + 1 guaranteed cup game is the minimum allowed under AFC regulations.
Viennese Vuck
|
|
|
|
|
Heart_fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8K,
Visits: 0
|
+xMore for WU's profile and acceptance in playing some matches at Aami atm. Easier to get to for derby matches for the people of West Melbourne. To get higher numbers and revenue ofcourse. Agree that it has its benefits, but from next season they will have to look elsewhere. Can’t have 3 teams playing at the same venue, especially when the bid was designed to broaden the reach of the sport into the western region.
|
|
|
|
|
Footyball
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
More for WU's profile and acceptance in playing some matches at Aami atm. Easier to get to for derby matches for the people of West Melbourne. To get higher numbers and revenue ofcourse.
|
|
|
|
|
AJF
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.7K,
Visits: 2
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xWonder what the afc will say?? Nothing. It has nothing to do with them - it’s a domestic competition. Well considering where part of the afc and they forbid more than 2 teams ground sharing. But you know that They do not forbid more than 2 teams ground sharing.
That rule applies to the ACL games, not domestic A League games.
Should all 3 Melbourne sides qualify for the same years ACL all three could play at AAMI in the A League but only two could use AAMI for ACL games.
I'm not so sure, it never explicitly mentions that the clubs sharing stadiums must be in the ACL itself, and the rule is part of the criteria for the Member Association as a whole. Page 12 and 13: https://www.the-afc.com/documents/entry-manual-for-afc-club-competitions-2021-edition4. ACL Criteria
4.1. Member Associations must meet all of the ACL Criteria as set out below in order to obtain direct slots for the ACL:
...
Criterion 4: Organisation of Professional Football League
The Member Association has:
4.1. a minimum of twenty-seven (27) matches per club in the domestic top division (including the domestic top division league, domestic cup and any grand final if applicable);
4.2. a minimum of an eight (8)-month duration of the domestic top division (including the domestic top division league, domestic cup and any grand final if applicable);
4.3. a home and away league format for the domestic top division league with maximum two (2) clubs sharing a stadium; In a worst-case scenario, WU's move could result in the whole league losing all our slots (or at least all our direct group slots). I expect there'll be leniency in the coming season due to covid, but what about next season once the covid excuse is no longer valid, and WU still haven't gotten their act together? Seeing as the A-League already breaches 4.1 and 4.2 I reckon 4.3 shouldn't be an issue During covid, yes. Western United said multiple times, they intial goal was never to move fixtures to AAMI. The reason they moved to AAMI was due to the Covid-19 protocols and saftey requirements. Playing at AAMI would be more suited to handle social distancing and a fair size of fans, in comparison to Whittan Oval, Knights Stadium or playing within Werribee. The costs to make these groups covid safe, outweighs the benefits. It was mentioned a road show of the west was planned, more games at Whittan Oval and a handful would be at Knight stadium, but covid killed this idea. Hopefully the stadium begins progress and next season, fingers cross covid isnt a factor, so they can have a last final homeless season, and have that as a road show. that sounds like mayo as Mars stadium in Ballarat only has a capacity of 11K with 5K of that seating so why arent there covid issues there?
|
|
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xWonder what the afc will say?? Nothing. It has nothing to do with them - it’s a domestic competition. Well considering where part of the afc and they forbid more than 2 teams ground sharing. But you know that They do not forbid more than 2 teams ground sharing.
That rule applies to the ACL games, not domestic A League games.
Should all 3 Melbourne sides qualify for the same years ACL all three could play at AAMI in the A League but only two could use AAMI for ACL games.
I'm not so sure, it never explicitly mentions that the clubs sharing stadiums must be in the ACL itself, and the rule is part of the criteria for the Member Association as a whole. Page 12 and 13: https://www.the-afc.com/documents/entry-manual-for-afc-club-competitions-2021-edition4. ACL Criteria
4.1. Member Associations must meet all of the ACL Criteria as set out below in order to obtain direct slots for the ACL:
...
Criterion 4: Organisation of Professional Football League
The Member Association has:
4.1. a minimum of twenty-seven (27) matches per club in the domestic top division (including the domestic top division league, domestic cup and any grand final if applicable);
4.2. a minimum of an eight (8)-month duration of the domestic top division (including the domestic top division league, domestic cup and any grand final if applicable);
4.3. a home and away league format for the domestic top division league with maximum two (2) clubs sharing a stadium; In a worst-case scenario, WU's move could result in the whole league losing all our slots (or at least all our direct group slots). I expect there'll be leniency in the coming season due to covid, but what about next season once the covid excuse is no longer valid, and WU still haven't gotten their act together? Seeing as the A-League already breaches 4.1 and 4.2 I reckon 4.3 shouldn't be an issue During covid, yes. Western United said multiple times, they intial goal was never to move fixtures to AAMI. The reason they moved to AAMI was due to the Covid-19 protocols and saftey requirements. Playing at AAMI would be more suited to handle social distancing and a fair size of fans, in comparison to Whittan Oval, Knights Stadium or playing within Werribee. The costs to make these groups covid safe, outweighs the benefits. It was mentioned a road show of the west was planned, more games at Whittan Oval and a handful would be at Knight stadium, but covid killed this idea. Hopefully the stadium begins progress and next season, fingers cross covid isnt a factor, so they can have a last final homeless season, and have that as a road show. Hahahahaahahahah gagahahahagaha seriously? Hahahahahahs
|
|
|
|
|
Remote Control
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Is this a JOKE How does "F.A " allow this happen ?! WHAT arethey thinking ??
|
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xWonder what the afc will say?? Nothing. It has nothing to do with them - it’s a domestic competition. Well considering where part of the afc and they forbid more than 2 teams ground sharing. But you know that They do not forbid more than 2 teams ground sharing.
That rule applies to the ACL games, not domestic A League games.
Should all 3 Melbourne sides qualify for the same years ACL all three could play at AAMI in the A League but only two could use AAMI for ACL games.
I'm not so sure, it never explicitly mentions that the clubs sharing stadiums must be in the ACL itself, and the rule is part of the criteria for the Member Association as a whole. Page 12 and 13: https://www.the-afc.com/documents/entry-manual-for-afc-club-competitions-2021-edition4. ACL Criteria
4.1. Member Associations must meet all of the ACL Criteria as set out below in order to obtain direct slots for the ACL:
...
Criterion 4: Organisation of Professional Football League
The Member Association has:
4.1. a minimum of twenty-seven (27) matches per club in the domestic top division (including the domestic top division league, domestic cup and any grand final if applicable);
4.2. a minimum of an eight (8)-month duration of the domestic top division (including the domestic top division league, domestic cup and any grand final if applicable);
4.3. a home and away league format for the domestic top division league with maximum two (2) clubs sharing a stadium; In a worst-case scenario, WU's move could result in the whole league losing all our slots (or at least all our direct group slots). I expect there'll be leniency in the coming season due to covid, but what about next season once the covid excuse is no longer valid, and WU still haven't gotten their act together? Seeing as the A-League already breaches 4.1 and 4.2 I reckon 4.3 shouldn't be an issue During covid, yes. Western United said multiple times, they intial goal was never to move fixtures to AAMI. The reason they moved to AAMI was due to the Covid-19 protocols and saftey requirements. Playing at AAMI would be more suited to handle social distancing and a fair size of fans, in comparison to Whittan Oval, Knights Stadium or playing within Werribee. The costs to make these groups covid safe, outweighs the benefits. It was mentioned a road show of the west was planned, more games at Whittan Oval and a handful would be at Knight stadium, but covid killed this idea. Hopefully the stadium begins progress and next season, fingers cross covid isnt a factor, so they can have a last final homeless season, and have that as a road show. They could play i dunno maybe at Avalon oval ?? Wyndham council own it and made it covid safe since there's only one grandstand there. Fans can spread out . Hell u could if you wanted to watch the game from across the road if u wanted to
|
|
|
|
|
elksy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 300,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xWonder what the afc will say?? Nothing. It has nothing to do with them - it’s a domestic competition. Well considering where part of the afc and they forbid more than 2 teams ground sharing. But you know that They do not forbid more than 2 teams ground sharing.
That rule applies to the ACL games, not domestic A League games.
Should all 3 Melbourne sides qualify for the same years ACL all three could play at AAMI in the A League but only two could use AAMI for ACL games.
I'm not so sure, it never explicitly mentions that the clubs sharing stadiums must be in the ACL itself, and the rule is part of the criteria for the Member Association as a whole. Page 12 and 13: https://www.the-afc.com/documents/entry-manual-for-afc-club-competitions-2021-edition4. ACL Criteria
4.1. Member Associations must meet all of the ACL Criteria as set out below in order to obtain direct slots for the ACL:
...
Criterion 4: Organisation of Professional Football League
The Member Association has:
4.1. a minimum of twenty-seven (27) matches per club in the domestic top division (including the domestic top division league, domestic cup and any grand final if applicable);
4.2. a minimum of an eight (8)-month duration of the domestic top division (including the domestic top division league, domestic cup and any grand final if applicable);
4.3. a home and away league format for the domestic top division league with maximum two (2) clubs sharing a stadium; In a worst-case scenario, WU's move could result in the whole league losing all our slots (or at least all our direct group slots). I expect there'll be leniency in the coming season due to covid, but what about next season once the covid excuse is no longer valid, and WU still haven't gotten their act together? Seeing as the A-League already breaches 4.1 and 4.2 I reckon 4.3 shouldn't be an issue During covid, yes. Western United said multiple times, they intial goal was never to move fixtures to AAMI. The reason they moved to AAMI was due to the Covid-19 protocols and saftey requirements. Playing at AAMI would be more suited to handle social distancing and a fair size of fans, in comparison to Whittan Oval, Knights Stadium or playing within Werribee. The costs to make these groups covid safe, outweighs the benefits. It was mentioned a road show of the west was planned, more games at Whittan Oval and a handful would be at Knight stadium, but covid killed this idea. Hopefully the stadium begins progress and next season, fingers cross covid isnt a factor, so they can have a last final homeless season, and have that as a road show.
|
|
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xWonder what the afc will say?? Nothing. It has nothing to do with them - it’s a domestic competition. Well considering where part of the afc and they forbid more than 2 teams ground sharing. But you know that They do not forbid more than 2 teams ground sharing.
That rule applies to the ACL games, not domestic A League games.
Should all 3 Melbourne sides qualify for the same years ACL all three could play at AAMI in the A League but only two could use AAMI for ACL games.
I'm not so sure, it never explicitly mentions that the clubs sharing stadiums must be in the ACL itself, and the rule is part of the criteria for the Member Association as a whole. Page 12 and 13: https://www.the-afc.com/documents/entry-manual-for-afc-club-competitions-2021-edition4. ACL Criteria
4.1. Member Associations must meet all of the ACL Criteria as set out below in order to obtain direct slots for the ACL:
...
Criterion 4: Organisation of Professional Football League
The Member Association has:
4.1. a minimum of twenty-seven (27) matches per club in the domestic top division (including the domestic top division league, domestic cup and any grand final if applicable);
4.2. a minimum of an eight (8)-month duration of the domestic top division (including the domestic top division league, domestic cup and any grand final if applicable);
4.3. a home and away league format for the domestic top division league with maximum two (2) clubs sharing a stadium; In a worst-case scenario, WU's move could result in the whole league losing all our slots (or at least all our direct group slots). I expect there'll be leniency in the coming season due to covid, but what about next season once the covid excuse is no longer valid, and WU still haven't gotten their act together? Seeing as the A-League already breaches 4.1 and 4.2 I reckon 4.3 shouldn't be an issue During covid, yes.
|
|
|
|
|
nick1408
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 668,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xWonder what the afc will say?? Nothing. It has nothing to do with them - it’s a domestic competition. Well considering where part of the afc and they forbid more than 2 teams ground sharing. But you know that They do not forbid more than 2 teams ground sharing.
That rule applies to the ACL games, not domestic A League games.
Should all 3 Melbourne sides qualify for the same years ACL all three could play at AAMI in the A League but only two could use AAMI for ACL games.
I'm not so sure, it never explicitly mentions that the clubs sharing stadiums must be in the ACL itself, and the rule is part of the criteria for the Member Association as a whole. Page 12 and 13: https://www.the-afc.com/documents/entry-manual-for-afc-club-competitions-2021-edition4. ACL Criteria
4.1. Member Associations must meet all of the ACL Criteria as set out below in order to obtain direct slots for the ACL:
...
Criterion 4: Organisation of Professional Football League
The Member Association has:
4.1. a minimum of twenty-seven (27) matches per club in the domestic top division (including the domestic top division league, domestic cup and any grand final if applicable);
4.2. a minimum of an eight (8)-month duration of the domestic top division (including the domestic top division league, domestic cup and any grand final if applicable);
4.3. a home and away league format for the domestic top division league with maximum two (2) clubs sharing a stadium; In a worst-case scenario, WU's move could result in the whole league losing all our slots (or at least all our direct group slots). I expect there'll be leniency in the coming season due to covid, but what about next season once the covid excuse is no longer valid, and WU still haven't gotten their act together? Seeing as the A-League already breaches 4.1 and 4.2 I reckon 4.3 shouldn't be an issue
|
|
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xWonder what the afc will say?? Nothing. It has nothing to do with them - it’s a domestic competition. Well considering where part of the afc and they forbid more than 2 teams ground sharing. But you know that They do not forbid more than 2 teams ground sharing.
That rule applies to the ACL games, not domestic A League games.
Should all 3 Melbourne sides qualify for the same years ACL all three could play at AAMI in the A League but only two could use AAMI for ACL games.
I'm not so sure. It never explicitly mentions that the clubs sharing stadiums must be in the ACL itself in the rulebook, and the rule is part of the criteria for the Member Association as a whole. Page 12 and 13: https://www.the-afc.com/documents/entry-manual-for-afc-club-competitions-2021-edition4. ACL Criteria
4.1. Member Associations must meet all of the ACL Criteria as set out below in order to obtain direct slots for the ACL:
...
Criterion 4: Organisation of Professional Football League
The Member Association has:
4.1. a minimum of twenty-seven (27) matches per club in the domestic top division (including the domestic top division league, domestic cup and any grand final if applicable);
4.2. a minimum of an eight (8)-month duration of the domestic top division (including the domestic top division league, domestic cup and any grand final if applicable);
4.3. a home and away league format for the domestic top division league with maximum two (2) clubs sharing a stadium; In a worst-case scenario, WU's move could result in the whole league losing all our slots (or at least all our direct group slots). I expect there'll be leniency in the coming season due to covid, but what about next season once the covid excuse is no longer valid, and WU still haven't gotten their act together?
|
|
|
|
|
Waz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xWonder what the afc will say?? Nothing. It has nothing to do with them - it’s a domestic competition. Well considering where part of the afc and they forbid more than 2 teams ground sharing. But you know that They do not forbid more than 2 teams ground sharing.
That rule applies to the ACL games, not domestic A League games.
Should all 3 Melbourne sides qualify for the same years ACL all three could play at AAMI in the A League but only two could use AAMI for ACL games.
|
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xWonder what the afc will say?? Nothing. It has nothing to do with them - it’s a domestic competition. Well considering where part of the afc and they forbid more than 2 teams ground sharing. But you know that
|
|
|
|