huddo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xAs somebody who is also a fan of women's sport it doesnt matter if I see the highest possible athletic people at the top of their game. All sport has the same drama, excitement, club connections, triumphs, fails etc... that makes sport something that consumes our weekends So to me it doesnt matter that the A League isnt the EPL, it is still the premier Australian league and for the first 6 years of the competition it actually meant something to me
Where the A League lost it for me was taking the initial necessary (arguably) model and keeping it as "the" product. Sport, first and foremost, should be competitive. This tired formula of teams taking it in turns in winning so fans dont get sad just doesnt cut it for me. Its like letting your nephew beat you in chess I enjoyed the W League in the early stages because even though there were only 1 or 2 competitive teams (those linked to Australian sports institutions), competition drives competition. Adelaide stepped up. Melbourne stepped up. Regions that didnt have much investment in the women's game stepped up, and the women's game as a whole has benefited. We see that in the Matildas. Now the league is more open and other teams can win it - because they earnt it (through one method or another). But the longer the W League goes on the more it is destined to be tarred with the same brush as the men's game (salary cap and other anti competitive measures so we can pretend regions are good) I havent watched a single A League game this season. I tried and turned it off after 30 seconds. I dont even check the results. I havent renewed my membership and I'm not going to either. Rigged sport is just tedious. And while some may argue wages largely determines who wins in an open competition, thats the professional game. Thats a national game. Even in the semi professional and amateur era there is always one driver that makes a region stronger than the other If you want balance, watch an under 12s local competition. If you want to see sport at the highest level in a country with a national framework, then accept that Gosford is not the best the country has to offer. If you can enjoy the world cup even though Australia cant win, but can improve that little bit each time, then you can enjoy the A League as a competitive league also Sorry but your narrative is counter-intuitive. You really enjoyed the A-League when the salary sap was strict. As the cap has been changed so that it doesn't reflect a cap at all you have lost interest as the larger teams dominate ever year. Also what is your obsession with Gosford? CCM have still won more domestically than Perth, Wellington, Melbourne City, WSW, Newcastle as well as Western United and Macarthur of course. Only Sydney, Victory, Brisbane and Adelaide with their FFA cup wins has been more successful. When all of them have won more than CCM you can start your obsession again. BTW - I'm happy for the cap to go - just don't follow your argument When the A League first launched there were only 2 regions with money for a game with zero interest. Setting up a professional national competition with 1 team per city and only 2 teams with money is destined for a Scotland scenario. Rightfully or wrongly, a salary cap helped distribute the players equally amongst the clubs to help the league grow a national professional status when the game had no money. It was only short term until the comp could get regions with more money (like they did with Gold Coast and TV deals), and also with more clubs from big cities. In my opinion, the initial league was a necessary evil, and with the salary cap largely a placebo I think the competition was "truer" The A League failed to move to the second step. It instead decided to box, label and package the initial league. The longer it goes, the more fake and transparent it becomes. Particularly as the players we are seeing are of a higher caliber than Muscat at the end of his career and Yorke at the end of his As for CCM, yes they have been successful, because we dont have an open league. We have already seen them fall off the pace with minimal allowances. This is literally the point I am making. You can boast about the success of CCM in a national league and the highest honours they have won because the league allows it. We let our nephew win a chess game I dont have a problem with CCM, Newcastle, Wollongong, Geelong or any regional team. I want to see them in the A League and wish them the best. The issue I have is they need to compete on their own merits and in the professional game that is player investment. Not rules prohibiting a club from signing too many good players so constant disruption forces an artificial shuffle each year Are you aware what would happen if the cap was removed, Crowd numbers would dwindle, scores more predictable, clubs less profitable, team numbers would reduce, talent coming through this would reduce, less qualification on an international stage as there is less talent, and Australia moves down the footballing ladder. If any thing I believe this form of compitition is the best as it means that poor managing cannot be paper-machade over with more money. As for CCM, well I'm a fan of em so I'm biased, but I see the CCM as a experiment of sorts, and it's been a resounding success, an area traditionally with no association with Football (I believe at the time of mariners inception CC was a RL heartland, 4th biggest participation numbers in the country), since then Football has grown, and been ahead of the curve on and off the pitch, whether it's the COE, the country's first ever football school, the youth scouting and develop structure, the diversification of their income streams, they have left alot of clubs in their dust. Yes CCM have had a couple of lean years, but they'll be back bigger than ever. BTW, I believe RL participation has also shrunk dramatically on the coast aswell, can't source it but I do remember reading it was now out of the top 10.
|
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+xSport does not have to be technically brilliant ...just emotionally brilliant . Great line.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
heyitsrobbie1984
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 160,
Visits: 0
|
i think the stigma of not being the best in the world will have alot to do with it.
lets be honest, we are pretty mediocre at best.
lets say all nations decided to be good at AFL or the NRL. would we still be the best in the world? not too sure
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThe stigma around it not being a top league or that it’s a boring sport. MCG your quote about it not being a top in comparo I'm guessing comes from your age demographic and those around you ? I'm asking for you quoted something else another time from the same age group. Boring ? well in Oz its been branded as such long long ago due to the gayfl/nrl mantras that npo game is worth watching if there's no scoring. IDGAF what people say from those other sports, ignorance. As for others around me who are die hard long time players and supporters of many EPL Club and some of AL Clubs. We all know what to expect - it is what it is. I'm not fussed about the fair wethered casual supporter, they either turn up of not who cares. Without going into long specifics good ol miron says it best, its an emotional link to those who love football. I love it since I was 5yrs. Still play, emotional with LFC, my grass roots Clubs, my NPL Clubs < both of these we attand games weekly - I followed the AL from the beginning to support FOOTBALL here and still a SFC member, I don't like our system it sucks bigtime but I hang in there for our game to finally have a proper P/R. I said a while ago covid has been GOOD for AL, I've been dying for our up and comers getting game time instead of bench warmers, about bloody time and hope this keeps going and will inspire those below. Again who cares what people think - you can lead the horse to water but you can't make em drink.
Love Football
|
|
|
DandyCasey
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 321,
Visits: 0
|
To old to care about the uncontrollable or pandering to the non believers.
It does however annoy me when the average non watching Joe automatically feels their opinion is wanted/matters or is valid in regards to the game....... imposing on my viewing enjoyment by reeling out soccer hate rhetoric from yesteryear!
|
|
|
localstar
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xi think the stigma of not being the best in the world will have alot to do with it. lets be honest, we are pretty mediocre at best. lets say all nations decided to be good at AFL or the NRL. would we still be the best in the world? not too sure Most other nations are not "the best in the world" either. But that doesn't mean their game is in crisis and nobody wants to watch it. Why are we so weird?
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xi think the stigma of not being the best in the world will have alot to do with it. lets be honest, we are pretty mediocre at best. lets say all nations decided to be good at AFL or the NRL. would we still be the best in the world? not too sure Most other nations are not "the best in the world" either. But that doesn't mean their game is in crisis and nobody wants to watch it. Why are we so weird? Not weird, just "unique" lol.
|
|
|
Footyball
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xi think the stigma of not being the best in the world will have alot to do with it. lets be honest, we are pretty mediocre at best. lets say all nations decided to be good at AFL or the NRL. would we still be the best in the world? not too sure Most other nations are not "the best in the world" either. But that doesn't mean their game is in crisis and nobody wants to watch it. Why are we so weird? Not weird, just "unique" lol. They don't have NRL, AFL & Cricket in various forms like here. Others have their turmoil in football but continue to stay as the numero ouno.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xi think the stigma of not being the best in the world will have alot to do with it. lets be honest, we are pretty mediocre at best. lets say all nations decided to be good at AFL or the NRL. would we still be the best in the world? not too sure Most other nations are not "the best in the world" either. But that doesn't mean their game is in crisis and nobody wants to watch it. Why are we so weird? Not weird, just "unique" lol. They don't have NRL, AFL & Cricket in various forms like here. Others have their turmoil in football but continue to stay as the numero ouno. So the million+ people (FFA numbers not mine) in this country that play, volunteer, spectate (whether that's local in person or overseas leagues on TV) or otherwise participate in soccer of some form don't support the A-league because of NRL and AFL and cricket??? How does that work?
|
|
|
bluebird2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 648,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xAs somebody who is also a fan of women's sport it doesnt matter if I see the highest possible athletic people at the top of their game. All sport has the same drama, excitement, club connections, triumphs, fails etc... that makes sport something that consumes our weekends So to me it doesnt matter that the A League isnt the EPL, it is still the premier Australian league and for the first 6 years of the competition it actually meant something to me
Where the A League lost it for me was taking the initial necessary (arguably) model and keeping it as "the" product. Sport, first and foremost, should be competitive. This tired formula of teams taking it in turns in winning so fans dont get sad just doesnt cut it for me. Its like letting your nephew beat you in chess I enjoyed the W League in the early stages because even though there were only 1 or 2 competitive teams (those linked to Australian sports institutions), competition drives competition. Adelaide stepped up. Melbourne stepped up. Regions that didnt have much investment in the women's game stepped up, and the women's game as a whole has benefited. We see that in the Matildas. Now the league is more open and other teams can win it - because they earnt it (through one method or another). But the longer the W League goes on the more it is destined to be tarred with the same brush as the men's game (salary cap and other anti competitive measures so we can pretend regions are good) I havent watched a single A League game this season. I tried and turned it off after 30 seconds. I dont even check the results. I havent renewed my membership and I'm not going to either. Rigged sport is just tedious. And while some may argue wages largely determines who wins in an open competition, thats the professional game. Thats a national game. Even in the semi professional and amateur era there is always one driver that makes a region stronger than the other If you want balance, watch an under 12s local competition. If you want to see sport at the highest level in a country with a national framework, then accept that Gosford is not the best the country has to offer. If you can enjoy the world cup even though Australia cant win, but can improve that little bit each time, then you can enjoy the A League as a competitive league also Sorry but your narrative is counter-intuitive. You really enjoyed the A-League when the salary sap was strict. As the cap has been changed so that it doesn't reflect a cap at all you have lost interest as the larger teams dominate ever year. Also what is your obsession with Gosford? CCM have still won more domestically than Perth, Wellington, Melbourne City, WSW, Newcastle as well as Western United and Macarthur of course. Only Sydney, Victory, Brisbane and Adelaide with their FFA cup wins has been more successful. When all of them have won more than CCM you can start your obsession again. BTW - I'm happy for the cap to go - just don't follow your argument When the A League first launched there were only 2 regions with money for a game with zero interest. Setting up a professional national competition with 1 team per city and only 2 teams with money is destined for a Scotland scenario. Rightfully or wrongly, a salary cap helped distribute the players equally amongst the clubs to help the league grow a national professional status when the game had no money. It was only short term until the comp could get regions with more money (like they did with Gold Coast and TV deals), and also with more clubs from big cities. In my opinion, the initial league was a necessary evil, and with the salary cap largely a placebo I think the competition was "truer" The A League failed to move to the second step. It instead decided to box, label and package the initial league. The longer it goes, the more fake and transparent it becomes. Particularly as the players we are seeing are of a higher caliber than Muscat at the end of his career and Yorke at the end of his As for CCM, yes they have been successful, because we dont have an open league. We have already seen them fall off the pace with minimal allowances. This is literally the point I am making. You can boast about the success of CCM in a national league and the highest honours they have won because the league allows it. We let our nephew win a chess game I dont have a problem with CCM, Newcastle, Wollongong, Geelong or any regional team. I want to see them in the A League and wish them the best. The issue I have is they need to compete on their own merits and in the professional game that is player investment. Not rules prohibiting a club from signing too many good players so constant disruption forces an artificial shuffle each year Are you aware what would happen if the cap was removed, Crowd numbers would dwindle, scores more predictable, clubs less profitable, team numbers would reduce, talent coming through this would reduce, less qualification on an international stage as there is less talent, and Australia moves down the footballing ladder. Thats nothing more than fear based worst case scenario speculation Crowds have dwindled, attendances have dropped, clubs are less profitable, broadcasters arent bidding for our game, talent has dropped off, we are risking not qualifying even though Asia, we are poor in the ACL, football has moved down the ladder - and all of this was before COVID, and all with a salary cap Its ridiculous to think that Australia doesnt have the money and interest in a national competitive league based on choices made by two codes when they became professional. If the cap was dropped some of the teams in the A League will be the biggest football clubs of any code in this country. Your prediction - less interest. Less profit. Less talent etc... Based on what? You're kidding yourself if you think 12 teams the size of CCM is going to drive up interest, profit and talent. In fact spreading the best players across 12 clubs means even more diluted talent for the bigger clubs. Things are only going to get worse as we add more teams
|
|
|
Footyball
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xi think the stigma of not being the best in the world will have alot to do with it. lets be honest, we are pretty mediocre at best. lets say all nations decided to be good at AFL or the NRL. would we still be the best in the world? not too sure Most other nations are not "the best in the world" either. But that doesn't mean their game is in crisis and nobody wants to watch it. Why are we so weird? Not weird, just "unique" lol. They don't have NRL, AFL & Cricket in various forms like here. Others have their turmoil in football but continue to stay as the numero ouno. So the million+ people (FFA numbers not mine) in this country that play, volunteer, spectate (whether that's local in person or overseas leagues on TV) or otherwise participate in soccer of some form don't support the A-league because of NRL and AFL and cricket??? How does that work? Its more complicated for soccer in Australia. There are other more established codes here. Always been issues. Many play, volunteer and watch tv but are not too passionate about ALeague like you and me. Too much infighting, Aussies in the past had been put off by flares and foreign club names. It's always been a hectic and colourful history. Unbundling (the bundle of cotton thread) should not be underestimated though. This could be the First and Only Restart to soccer in this country for all parties. It happened in our lifetime in this country with all the politics, which is astonishing alone. Adding new teams and implementing all the other principles that JJ mentioned is the way forward, even for some ex NSL teams to possibly get back to the top League.
|
|
|
Coverdale
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xIt’s live football in prime time on the weekend I can cook/bbq and have some beers and watch football. Who cares about the make up of the league or the clubs. Just watch the damn game and be happy you don’t have to get up at 3am. If you dont care about the clubs in the league, who do you watch, just whatever they show you??? I mean don’t worry about the legal entity status of a bloody club and just enjoy football on tv in prime time. Jesus.
|
|
|
huddo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xAs somebody who is also a fan of women's sport it doesnt matter if I see the highest possible athletic people at the top of their game. All sport has the same drama, excitement, club connections, triumphs, fails etc... that makes sport something that consumes our weekends So to me it doesnt matter that the A League isnt the EPL, it is still the premier Australian league and for the first 6 years of the competition it actually meant something to me
Where the A League lost it for me was taking the initial necessary (arguably) model and keeping it as "the" product. Sport, first and foremost, should be competitive. This tired formula of teams taking it in turns in winning so fans dont get sad just doesnt cut it for me. Its like letting your nephew beat you in chess I enjoyed the W League in the early stages because even though there were only 1 or 2 competitive teams (those linked to Australian sports institutions), competition drives competition. Adelaide stepped up. Melbourne stepped up. Regions that didnt have much investment in the women's game stepped up, and the women's game as a whole has benefited. We see that in the Matildas. Now the league is more open and other teams can win it - because they earnt it (through one method or another). But the longer the W League goes on the more it is destined to be tarred with the same brush as the men's game (salary cap and other anti competitive measures so we can pretend regions are good) I havent watched a single A League game this season. I tried and turned it off after 30 seconds. I dont even check the results. I havent renewed my membership and I'm not going to either. Rigged sport is just tedious. And while some may argue wages largely determines who wins in an open competition, thats the professional game. Thats a national game. Even in the semi professional and amateur era there is always one driver that makes a region stronger than the other If you want balance, watch an under 12s local competition. If you want to see sport at the highest level in a country with a national framework, then accept that Gosford is not the best the country has to offer. If you can enjoy the world cup even though Australia cant win, but can improve that little bit each time, then you can enjoy the A League as a competitive league also Sorry but your narrative is counter-intuitive. You really enjoyed the A-League when the salary sap was strict. As the cap has been changed so that it doesn't reflect a cap at all you have lost interest as the larger teams dominate ever year. Also what is your obsession with Gosford? CCM have still won more domestically than Perth, Wellington, Melbourne City, WSW, Newcastle as well as Western United and Macarthur of course. Only Sydney, Victory, Brisbane and Adelaide with their FFA cup wins has been more successful. When all of them have won more than CCM you can start your obsession again. BTW - I'm happy for the cap to go - just don't follow your argument When the A League first launched there were only 2 regions with money for a game with zero interest. Setting up a professional national competition with 1 team per city and only 2 teams with money is destined for a Scotland scenario. Rightfully or wrongly, a salary cap helped distribute the players equally amongst the clubs to help the league grow a national professional status when the game had no money. It was only short term until the comp could get regions with more money (like they did with Gold Coast and TV deals), and also with more clubs from big cities. In my opinion, the initial league was a necessary evil, and with the salary cap largely a placebo I think the competition was "truer" The A League failed to move to the second step. It instead decided to box, label and package the initial league. The longer it goes, the more fake and transparent it becomes. Particularly as the players we are seeing are of a higher caliber than Muscat at the end of his career and Yorke at the end of his As for CCM, yes they have been successful, because we dont have an open league. We have already seen them fall off the pace with minimal allowances. This is literally the point I am making. You can boast about the success of CCM in a national league and the highest honours they have won because the league allows it. We let our nephew win a chess game I dont have a problem with CCM, Newcastle, Wollongong, Geelong or any regional team. I want to see them in the A League and wish them the best. The issue I have is they need to compete on their own merits and in the professional game that is player investment. Not rules prohibiting a club from signing too many good players so constant disruption forces an artificial shuffle each year Are you aware what would happen if the cap was removed, Crowd numbers would dwindle, scores more predictable, clubs less profitable, team numbers would reduce, talent coming through this would reduce, less qualification on an international stage as there is less talent, and Australia moves down the footballing ladder. Thats nothing more than fear based worst case scenario speculation Crowds have dwindled, attendances have dropped, clubs are less profitable, broadcasters arent bidding for our game, talent has dropped off, we are risking not qualifying even though Asia, we are poor in the ACL, football has moved down the ladder - and all of this was before COVID, and all with a salary cap Its ridiculous to think that Australia doesnt have the money and interest in a national competitive league based on choices made by two codes when they became professional. If the cap was dropped some of the teams in the A League will be the biggest football clubs of any code in this country. Your prediction - less interest. Less profit. Less talent etc... Based on what? You're kidding yourself if you think 12 teams the size of CCM is going to drive up interest, profit and talent. In fact spreading the best players across 12 clubs means even more diluted talent for the bigger clubs. Things are only going to get worse as we add more teams All this is based off your opinion. If you want to see what happens when finances aren't regulated have a look at the dying days of the NSL, club turn over was next level.
|
|
|
Footyball
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xAs somebody who is also a fan of women's sport it doesnt matter if I see the highest possible athletic people at the top of their game. All sport has the same drama, excitement, club connections, triumphs, fails etc... that makes sport something that consumes our weekends So to me it doesnt matter that the A League isnt the EPL, it is still the premier Australian league and for the first 6 years of the competition it actually meant something to me
Where the A League lost it for me was taking the initial necessary (arguably) model and keeping it as "the" product. Sport, first and foremost, should be competitive. This tired formula of teams taking it in turns in winning so fans dont get sad just doesnt cut it for me. Its like letting your nephew beat you in chess I enjoyed the W League in the early stages because even though there were only 1 or 2 competitive teams (those linked to Australian sports institutions), competition drives competition. Adelaide stepped up. Melbourne stepped up. Regions that didnt have much investment in the women's game stepped up, and the women's game as a whole has benefited. We see that in the Matildas. Now the league is more open and other teams can win it - because they earnt it (through one method or another). But the longer the W League goes on the more it is destined to be tarred with the same brush as the men's game (salary cap and other anti competitive measures so we can pretend regions are good) I havent watched a single A League game this season. I tried and turned it off after 30 seconds. I dont even check the results. I havent renewed my membership and I'm not going to either. Rigged sport is just tedious. And while some may argue wages largely determines who wins in an open competition, thats the professional game. Thats a national game. Even in the semi professional and amateur era there is always one driver that makes a region stronger than the other If you want balance, watch an under 12s local competition. If you want to see sport at the highest level in a country with a national framework, then accept that Gosford is not the best the country has to offer. If you can enjoy the world cup even though Australia cant win, but can improve that little bit each time, then you can enjoy the A League as a competitive league also Sorry but your narrative is counter-intuitive. You really enjoyed the A-League when the salary sap was strict. As the cap has been changed so that it doesn't reflect a cap at all you have lost interest as the larger teams dominate ever year. Also what is your obsession with Gosford? CCM have still won more domestically than Perth, Wellington, Melbourne City, WSW, Newcastle as well as Western United and Macarthur of course. Only Sydney, Victory, Brisbane and Adelaide with their FFA cup wins has been more successful. When all of them have won more than CCM you can start your obsession again. BTW - I'm happy for the cap to go - just don't follow your argument When the A League first launched there were only 2 regions with money for a game with zero interest. Setting up a professional national competition with 1 team per city and only 2 teams with money is destined for a Scotland scenario. Rightfully or wrongly, a salary cap helped distribute the players equally amongst the clubs to help the league grow a national professional status when the game had no money. It was only short term until the comp could get regions with more money (like they did with Gold Coast and TV deals), and also with more clubs from big cities. In my opinion, the initial league was a necessary evil, and with the salary cap largely a placebo I think the competition was "truer" The A League failed to move to the second step. It instead decided to box, label and package the initial league. The longer it goes, the more fake and transparent it becomes. Particularly as the players we are seeing are of a higher caliber than Muscat at the end of his career and Yorke at the end of his As for CCM, yes they have been successful, because we dont have an open league. We have already seen them fall off the pace with minimal allowances. This is literally the point I am making. You can boast about the success of CCM in a national league and the highest honours they have won because the league allows it. We let our nephew win a chess game I dont have a problem with CCM, Newcastle, Wollongong, Geelong or any regional team. I want to see them in the A League and wish them the best. The issue I have is they need to compete on their own merits and in the professional game that is player investment. Not rules prohibiting a club from signing too many good players so constant disruption forces an artificial shuffle each year Are you aware what would happen if the cap was removed, Crowd numbers would dwindle, scores more predictable, clubs less profitable, team numbers would reduce, talent coming through this would reduce, less qualification on an international stage as there is less talent, and Australia moves down the footballing ladder. Thats nothing more than fear based worst case scenario speculation Crowds have dwindled, attendances have dropped, clubs are less profitable, broadcasters arent bidding for our game, talent has dropped off, we are risking not qualifying even though Asia, we are poor in the ACL, football has moved down the ladder - and all of this was before COVID, and all with a salary cap Its ridiculous to think that Australia doesnt have the money and interest in a national competitive league based on choices made by two codes when they became professional. If the cap was dropped some of the teams in the A League will be the biggest football clubs of any code in this country. Your prediction - less interest. Less profit. Less talent etc... Based on what? You're kidding yourself if you think 12 teams the size of CCM is going to drive up interest, profit and talent. In fact spreading the best players across 12 clubs means even more diluted talent for the bigger clubs. Things are only going to get worse as we add more teams All this is based off your opinion. If you want to see what happens when finances aren't regulated have a look at the dying days of the NSL, club turn over was next level. This is the best lot of imports to play on these shores as a collective quantity so there must be appeal toward the A League atm. The young talent is like a production line.. the League is travelling as good as it can for now. It is a reset season and there are systems not in place like a naming sponsor, if the Apl goes about it that way, or whatever way. Crowds are not allowed to full capacities as well due to you know what.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xIt’s live football in prime time on the weekend I can cook/bbq and have some beers and watch football. Who cares about the make up of the league or the clubs. Just watch the damn game and be happy you don’t have to get up at 3am. If you dont care about the clubs in the league, who do you watch, just whatever they show you??? I mean don’t worry about the legal entity status of a bloody club and just enjoy football on tv in prime time. Jesus. Yeah I get what you meant but who do I watch? What team? Mine isnt allowed entry into the competition therefore is NOT on primetime.... why would I bother?
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xi think the stigma of not being the best in the world will have alot to do with it. lets be honest, we are pretty mediocre at best. lets say all nations decided to be good at AFL or the NRL. would we still be the best in the world? not too sure Most other nations are not "the best in the world" either. But that doesn't mean their game is in crisis and nobody wants to watch it. Why are we so weird? Not weird, just "unique" lol. They don't have NRL, AFL & Cricket in various forms like here. Others have their turmoil in football but continue to stay as the numero ouno. So the million+ people (FFA numbers not mine) in this country that play, volunteer, spectate (whether that's local in person or overseas leagues on TV) or otherwise participate in soccer of some form don't support the A-league because of NRL and AFL and cricket??? How does that work? Its more complicated for soccer in Australia. There are other more established codes here. Always been issues. Many play, volunteer and watch tv but are not too passionate about ALeague like you and me. Too much infighting, Aussies in the past had been put off by flares and foreign club names. It's always been a hectic and colourful history. Unbundling (the bundle of cotton thread) should not be underestimated though. This could be the First and Only Restart to soccer in this country for all parties. It happened in our lifetime in this country with all the politics, which is astonishing alone. Adding new teams and implementing all the other principles that JJ mentioned is the way forward, even for some ex NSL teams to possibly get back to the top League. Your giving conflicting answers mate. So are Aussies not interested in A league because they hate wogs and flares or because they prefer NRL and footy? Are you saying they just dont like the sport itself or is it the Aleague that is on the nose? If 1mill+ are engaging in some way with soccer elsewhere I would assume the latter.
|
|
|
Footyball
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xi think the stigma of not being the best in the world will have alot to do with it. lets be honest, we are pretty mediocre at best. lets say all nations decided to be good at AFL or the NRL. would we still be the best in the world? not too sure Most other nations are not "the best in the world" either. But that doesn't mean their game is in crisis and nobody wants to watch it. Why are we so weird? Not weird, just "unique" lol. They don't have NRL, AFL & Cricket in various forms like here. Others have their turmoil in football but continue to stay as the numero ouno. So the million+ people (FFA numbers not mine) in this country that play, volunteer, spectate (whether that's local in person or overseas leagues on TV) or otherwise participate in soccer of some form don't support the A-league because of NRL and AFL and cricket??? How does that work? Its more complicated for soccer in Australia. There are other more established codes here. Always been issues. Many play, volunteer and watch tv but are not too passionate about ALeague like you and me. Too much infighting, Aussies in the past had been put off by flares and foreign club names. It's always been a hectic and colourful history. Unbundling (the bundle of cotton thread) should not be underestimated though. This could be the First and Only Restart to soccer in this country for all parties. It happened in our lifetime in this country with all the politics, which is astonishing alone. Adding new teams and implementing all the other principles that JJ mentioned is the way forward, even for some ex NSL teams to possibly get back to the top League. Your giving conflicting answers mate. So are Aussies not interested in A league because they hate wogs and flares or because they prefer NRL and footy? Are you saying they just dont like the sport itself or is it the Aleague that is on the nose? If 1mill+ are engaging in some way with soccer elsewhere I would assume the latter. Not conflicting at all. The A League has been abit on the nose through its history. Alot of the reasons that you have come up with are hard to argue against. It has not built up a high enough profile at the same time over the years as compared to the established codes in Australia. The FA and APL are tasked with trying to change the perceptions and stereotypes that football is wogball. They can do this through marketing and more exposure of their content. For one, as much as me and you understand flares, the mainstream here find them revolting and insightful and that will never change on the macro scale. What works overseas doesn't always work over here. For one they are illegal. No argument there. Other codes through their players often find themselves embroiled in hot water with various issues but not being wogball, they are easily forgiven generally overall. A player misbehaves or a fan at a match does something wrong in the A League and it is wogball. Andy Harper is great to listen to about his study and findings about the roots of football and its journey in Australia. As 1 mil+ are involved in soccer, it is not equating into enough interest in the A League. The code is not the finished article as we know. Hopefully with this reset that has recently occured, it is the one chance that football has to eventually change perceptions and start to make a dent within the Australian sporting landscape. I find that the product has subtly improved already.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xi think the stigma of not being the best in the world will have alot to do with it. lets be honest, we are pretty mediocre at best. lets say all nations decided to be good at AFL or the NRL. would we still be the best in the world? not too sure Most other nations are not "the best in the world" either. But that doesn't mean their game is in crisis and nobody wants to watch it. Why are we so weird? Not weird, just "unique" lol. They don't have NRL, AFL & Cricket in various forms like here. Others have their turmoil in football but continue to stay as the numero ouno. So the million+ people (FFA numbers not mine) in this country that play, volunteer, spectate (whether that's local in person or overseas leagues on TV) or otherwise participate in soccer of some form don't support the A-league because of NRL and AFL and cricket??? How does that work? Its more complicated for soccer in Australia. There are other more established codes here. Always been issues. Many play, volunteer and watch tv but are not too passionate about ALeague like you and me. Too much infighting, Aussies in the past had been put off by flares and foreign club names. It's always been a hectic and colourful history. Unbundling (the bundle of cotton thread) should not be underestimated though. This could be the First and Only Restart to soccer in this country for all parties. It happened in our lifetime in this country with all the politics, which is astonishing alone. Adding new teams and implementing all the other principles that JJ mentioned is the way forward, even for some ex NSL teams to possibly get back to the top League. Your giving conflicting answers mate. So are Aussies not interested in A league because they hate wogs and flares or because they prefer NRL and footy? Are you saying they just dont like the sport itself or is it the Aleague that is on the nose? If 1mill+ are engaging in some way with soccer elsewhere I would assume the latter. Not conflicting at all, The A League has been abit on the nose through its history. Alot of the reasons that you have come up with are hard to argue against. It has not built up a high enough profile at the same time over the years as compared to the established codes in Australia. The FA and APL are tasked with trying to change the perceptions and stereotypes that football is wogball. They can do this through marketing and more exposure of their content. For one, as much as me and you understand flares, the mainstream find them revolting and insightful and that will never change on the macro scale. No argument there. Andy Harper is great to listen to about his study and findings about the roots of football and its journey in Australia. The A League is not yet the finished article as you know. As 1 mil+ are involved in soccer, it is not equating into enough interest in the A League. Other codes through their players often find themselves embroiled in hot water with issues but other codes are not wogball so they are easily forgiven, its just how it is. Hopefully with this reset that has recently occured, it is the one chance that football has to eventually change perceptions and start to make a dent within the Australian sporting landscape. I find that the product has improved already. The key argumemt from me though is that the 1 mil+ ( if that is even a real figure or even if it is less) who are involved in soccer dont need to be sold on the sport, they already like it in some form or another so NRL and AFL opinions do NOT (or should not) affect how these people see the game. Let me put it another way as I'd like your opinion on this and anyone else who wants to chime in, lets pretend the 1 mil+ that already like soccer in this country are the last people left in Australia..... this covid thing gets out of control and by some devine soccer God providence the only people left in Australia are those who either play the game, are involved in a club or are spectators of local and or international soccer (just a hypothetical scenario, no need for anyone to rush out and buy loo paper) .. That is 1 million people who like the sport and only 50k at best are watching the Aleague...... Market to them first and even a 15% increase is another 150K of supporters. Those 1mill+ are not being "serviced" why? That is the golden question. Federations overseas have national populations less than 1 million yet manage to run multiple divisions and a healthy soccer system, not to mention countries like Iceland who make World Cups with a population smaller than Geelong.... Other sports are NOT to blame mate nor is the attitude of bogan Australia, these are just excuses, we have a huge support base the FFA is just useless.....
|
|
|
Footyball
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xi think the stigma of not being the best in the world will have alot to do with it. lets be honest, we are pretty mediocre at best. lets say all nations decided to be good at AFL or the NRL. would we still be the best in the world? not too sure Most other nations are not "the best in the world" either. But that doesn't mean their game is in crisis and nobody wants to watch it. Why are we so weird? Not weird, just "unique" lol. They don't have NRL, AFL & Cricket in various forms like here. Others have their turmoil in football but continue to stay as the numero ouno. So the million+ people (FFA numbers not mine) in this country that play, volunteer, spectate (whether that's local in person or overseas leagues on TV) or otherwise participate in soccer of some form don't support the A-league because of NRL and AFL and cricket??? How does that work? Its more complicated for soccer in Australia. There are other more established codes here. Always been issues. Many play, volunteer and watch tv but are not too passionate about ALeague like you and me. Too much infighting, Aussies in the past had been put off by flares and foreign club names. It's always been a hectic and colourful history. Unbundling (the bundle of cotton thread) should not be underestimated though. This could be the First and Only Restart to soccer in this country for all parties. It happened in our lifetime in this country with all the politics, which is astonishing alone. Adding new teams and implementing all the other principles that JJ mentioned is the way forward, even for some ex NSL teams to possibly get back to the top League. Your giving conflicting answers mate. So are Aussies not interested in A league because they hate wogs and flares or because they prefer NRL and footy? Are you saying they just dont like the sport itself or is it the Aleague that is on the nose? If 1mill+ are engaging in some way with soccer elsewhere I would assume the latter. Not conflicting at all, The A League has been abit on the nose through its history. Alot of the reasons that you have come up with are hard to argue against. It has not built up a high enough profile at the same time over the years as compared to the established codes in Australia. The FA and APL are tasked with trying to change the perceptions and stereotypes that football is wogball. They can do this through marketing and more exposure of their content. For one, as much as me and you understand flares, the mainstream find them revolting and insightful and that will never change on the macro scale. No argument there. Andy Harper is great to listen to about his study and findings about the roots of football and its journey in Australia. The A League is not yet the finished article as you know. As 1 mil+ are involved in soccer, it is not equating into enough interest in the A League. Other codes through their players often find themselves embroiled in hot water with issues but other codes are not wogball so they are easily forgiven, its just how it is. Hopefully with this reset that has recently occured, it is the one chance that football has to eventually change perceptions and start to make a dent within the Australian sporting landscape. I find that the product has improved already. The key argumemt from me though is that the 1 mil+ ( if that is even a real figure or even if it is less) who are involved in soccer dont need to be sold on the sport, they already like it in some form or another so NRL and AFL opinions do NOT (or should not) affect how these people see the game. Let me put it another way as I'd like your opinion on this and anyone else who wants to chime in, lets pretend the 1 mil+ that already like soccer in this country are the last people left in Australia..... this covid thing gets out of control and by some devine soccer God providence the only people left in Australia are those who either play the game, are involved in a club or are spectators of local and or international soccer (just a hypothetical scenario, no need for anyone to rush out and buy loo paper) .. That is 1 million people who like the sport and only 50k at best are watching the Aleague...... Market to them first and even a 15% increase is another 150K of supporters. Those 1mill+ are not being "serviced" why? That is the golden question. Federations overseas have national populations less than 1 million yet manage to run multiple divisions and a healthy soccer system, not to mention countries like Iceland who make World Cups with a population smaller than Geelong.... Other sports are NOT to blame mate nor is the attitude of bogan Australia, these are just excuses, we have a huge support base the FFA is just useless..... The 1 mil+ (whether it is or not), which are probably the commited and rusted on supporters, even they are sick to death of the federations constantly in conflict with the FFA up till now 'perhaps.' I believe the masses have been affected by constant negativity in Australia when it comes to soccer. State and Local governments favouring the other codes being prevalent for one. Also, Frank excluding teams with rich history has played a major role. The idea of de-wogafying the new A League 16-17 years ago was so the conflicting monocultures and bad practices like flares would cease. Its not the anglo Australian way and I understand that. WIth the new A League Frank's vision excluded alot of passionate supporters way back then and still today. The winter sport turned into a Fox summer sport, played often in 35+ degree heat, what!!! and the comp not being aligned with the rest of football in the lower tiers either. As for the wavering supporters, many have disappeared. They enjoy other sports and easily go away because football cannot find traction...till now hopefully. This comes down to marketing and advertising which is non-existent. These supporters would come back. I became a rusted on supporter a while back. My early days were spent playing and following another sport, all the while keeping a slight interest in football. To me somehow, football became my no.1 sport and would of focussed on playing that if I had it over again. My interest grew through the success stories of the International team. I would go for Sydney Olympic if they were in the A League. If there was a team nonetheless exclusive to Southern Sydney in the A League, I would probably support them. Sydney fc cannot cover the City, North/West and the South of Sydney all at once, not for me. I don't follow a team in the top flight, although, I am enthused by the A League and want it to thrive for all the right reasons. If the comp can be mentioned in the same breathe as the Eredivisie, Swedish, Croatian, South Korean and other similar leagues, well thats a major win for me. I hope it can Now happen sooner rather than later. Look at the populations of Iceland. Uruguay and Croatia, yet they have very strong football comps. The A League can be like this. The Enemy of Football in Australia has firstly been itself, no question! After around 6-8 years of the initial A League, second division should of started to happen. By now, pro/rel may have been ready to be integrated. The A League should be at 14 or maybe 16 teams by now. Perception is also very important. The Afl has 18 teams, the Nrl have 16 teams and would love to be at 18 teams. The A League is only Now at 12 teams. The more teams, the healthier and more successful the sporting code looks. The NRL, known as something else then, had a 12 team comp back in 1981, when in 1982 Canberra and lllawarra were admitted. In those days, Johnny Warren would do a segment on soccer on a program called Sportsworld on channel 7, main host was League hard man Rex 'the Moose' Mossop. The A League could be perceived as 30-40 years behind today compared to where they should be, that's the perception that I mentioned. If the A League grows further, the culture will eventually get stronger I believe football will be passed down to younger fans as well. The NBL is not a competitor to the football codes so they are not judged on their few teams that they operate with and successfully in their own right. I can't stress how important the 'Unbundling' was man. Now the comp needs to rocket to 16 teams in my view. If I could I would add four teams over the next two seasons as a matter of urgency and let them find their way, on the job, like most occupations, Japan and MLS style.
|
|
|
bluebird2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 648,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xAs somebody who is also a fan of women's sport it doesnt matter if I see the highest possible athletic people at the top of their game. All sport has the same drama, excitement, club connections, triumphs, fails etc... that makes sport something that consumes our weekends So to me it doesnt matter that the A League isnt the EPL, it is still the premier Australian league and for the first 6 years of the competition it actually meant something to me
Where the A League lost it for me was taking the initial necessary (arguably) model and keeping it as "the" product. Sport, first and foremost, should be competitive. This tired formula of teams taking it in turns in winning so fans dont get sad just doesnt cut it for me. Its like letting your nephew beat you in chess I enjoyed the W League in the early stages because even though there were only 1 or 2 competitive teams (those linked to Australian sports institutions), competition drives competition. Adelaide stepped up. Melbourne stepped up. Regions that didnt have much investment in the women's game stepped up, and the women's game as a whole has benefited. We see that in the Matildas. Now the league is more open and other teams can win it - because they earnt it (through one method or another). But the longer the W League goes on the more it is destined to be tarred with the same brush as the men's game (salary cap and other anti competitive measures so we can pretend regions are good) I havent watched a single A League game this season. I tried and turned it off after 30 seconds. I dont even check the results. I havent renewed my membership and I'm not going to either. Rigged sport is just tedious. And while some may argue wages largely determines who wins in an open competition, thats the professional game. Thats a national game. Even in the semi professional and amateur era there is always one driver that makes a region stronger than the other If you want balance, watch an under 12s local competition. If you want to see sport at the highest level in a country with a national framework, then accept that Gosford is not the best the country has to offer. If you can enjoy the world cup even though Australia cant win, but can improve that little bit each time, then you can enjoy the A League as a competitive league also Sorry but your narrative is counter-intuitive. You really enjoyed the A-League when the salary sap was strict. As the cap has been changed so that it doesn't reflect a cap at all you have lost interest as the larger teams dominate ever year. Also what is your obsession with Gosford? CCM have still won more domestically than Perth, Wellington, Melbourne City, WSW, Newcastle as well as Western United and Macarthur of course. Only Sydney, Victory, Brisbane and Adelaide with their FFA cup wins has been more successful. When all of them have won more than CCM you can start your obsession again. BTW - I'm happy for the cap to go - just don't follow your argument When the A League first launched there were only 2 regions with money for a game with zero interest. Setting up a professional national competition with 1 team per city and only 2 teams with money is destined for a Scotland scenario. Rightfully or wrongly, a salary cap helped distribute the players equally amongst the clubs to help the league grow a national professional status when the game had no money. It was only short term until the comp could get regions with more money (like they did with Gold Coast and TV deals), and also with more clubs from big cities. In my opinion, the initial league was a necessary evil, and with the salary cap largely a placebo I think the competition was "truer" The A League failed to move to the second step. It instead decided to box, label and package the initial league. The longer it goes, the more fake and transparent it becomes. Particularly as the players we are seeing are of a higher caliber than Muscat at the end of his career and Yorke at the end of his As for CCM, yes they have been successful, because we dont have an open league. We have already seen them fall off the pace with minimal allowances. This is literally the point I am making. You can boast about the success of CCM in a national league and the highest honours they have won because the league allows it. We let our nephew win a chess game I dont have a problem with CCM, Newcastle, Wollongong, Geelong or any regional team. I want to see them in the A League and wish them the best. The issue I have is they need to compete on their own merits and in the professional game that is player investment. Not rules prohibiting a club from signing too many good players so constant disruption forces an artificial shuffle each year Are you aware what would happen if the cap was removed, Crowd numbers would dwindle, scores more predictable, clubs less profitable, team numbers would reduce, talent coming through this would reduce, less qualification on an international stage as there is less talent, and Australia moves down the footballing ladder. Thats nothing more than fear based worst case scenario speculation Crowds have dwindled, attendances have dropped, clubs are less profitable, broadcasters arent bidding for our game, talent has dropped off, we are risking not qualifying even though Asia, we are poor in the ACL, football has moved down the ladder - and all of this was before COVID, and all with a salary cap Its ridiculous to think that Australia doesnt have the money and interest in a national competitive league based on choices made by two codes when they became professional. If the cap was dropped some of the teams in the A League will be the biggest football clubs of any code in this country. Your prediction - less interest. Less profit. Less talent etc... Based on what? You're kidding yourself if you think 12 teams the size of CCM is going to drive up interest, profit and talent. In fact spreading the best players across 12 clubs means even more diluted talent for the bigger clubs. Things are only going to get worse as we add more teams All this is based off your opinion. If you want to see what happens when finances aren't regulated have a look at the dying days of the NSL, club turn over was next level. Your view point is so much recycled and "copy and paste" from a previous era that you think the flaws of the game that I pointed out above are my opinion Secondly you think taking a single maximum figure and applying it to player salaries only is going to stop clubs from going broke. If the salary cap is about financial regulation then why is it the same for the big clubs as it is for the small clubs? Why have we seen A League clubs go broke, several might I add, despite a salary cap? Also you throw in the classic NSL line. You do realise that the NSL was a semi professional league with no major TV deal or commercial backing? Every single flaw you have pointed out in removing the salary cap is a fact of the current game. You dont know what it does. You just know our code will die without one
|
|
|
overroared
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 545,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xNo. When we have a product that generates its own demand those who don't care about the league now may get drawn in. Until then, it is our top level competition and as long as I have a team in it I will be interested myself. The best players will generally strive to play in the top flight of any sport to prove themselves against their peers. The best teams will generally strive to play in the top flight of their sport to prove that they should be there (Hi Mono). The aleague and wleague are the top level of 'domestic' football in this country. People will argue happily about whether that means the best players or not - but I do not believe anyone seriously disputes that these leagues are the top level competition in the country. People's opinions will not change that for me. I would say a lot of the people who don't care about the aleague don't care about soccer/football as a spectator sport at the domestic level. They may play it and love that without feeling any interest in going to watch others play it other than to watch our national team. Those who do go or have previously gone regularly to aleague matches are the people whose thoughts I find relevant - but only as far as learning what works or does not work with the game or league. This branch of the forum is based on what people think about the aleague - wouldn't read and post here if I did not care what they think. Hey Roar IMB, Happy New Year. Absolutely agree that the best teams will strive to play at the highest possible level, bit hard to do when you have been actively prevented from doing so for 16 years though wouldn't you say? "I would say a lot of the people who don't care about the aleague don't care about soccer/football as a spectator sport at the domestic level. They may play it and love that without feeling any interest in going to watch others play it other than to watch our national team."
I dont agree with your comment above though at all mate, sorry. I have been caring about soccer in this country for at least 40 years and have been a very present spectator for a huge chunk of that. Not caring about a closed off "league" of 10-12 odd teams doesnt mean that I wont follow my club whatever level they are in. If by some miracle of miracles that means we find ourselves in the A-League, will my opinions then automatically become relevant? My contention was that most people in this country don't care about the aleague or football as a spectator sport. The second part was to say that a subset of those people may even enjoy playing the game itself. The participation rate in football is huge - but the crowds aren't, relative to the numbers who do play (my opinion and not necessarily fact - happy to hear otherwise). I excluded the national team because we effectively get sell out crowds at the national level putting them in a category of their own. I agree that many people DO go to their clubs games, and was not meaning you have to support an aleague club or the aleague itself to have relevant opinions on football itself. When I said "Those who do go or have previously gone regularly to aleague matches are the people whose thoughts I find relevant - but only as far as learning what works or does not work with the game or league" I was referring to the topic specifically. I only really care about the aleague opinions of those who have been involved in it in some way. I don't care what people may think about the aleague if they have not been to or watched many aleague games. Thanks for clarifying. In this I agree and part of the reason why franchising insistence on geographical placement of teams based on population and participation, in my opinion doesn't work. The whole insistence of building a fan base where there are young families, or growth corridors of football mad immigrants is pie in the sky marketing stuff for me.. Also I agree, my opinions on anything Aleague are purely as a disinterested outsider if anything., but that does not take away my right to care about the state of the game in this country or attend as many games as I can get away with every season to support my club. You should care what people like me think about the A-league though as "fish where the fish are" and "converting the mainstream AFL and NRL masses" hasn't worked. You catch more flies with honey mate, and blaming Eurosnobs and NSL dinosaurs for the woes of the A-League isnt going to make them go away. We have to improve the flavour of our honey before we worry about selling it to people who have grown up eating their own local honey though. I do not believe you personally are likely to have any real interest in the aleague until your club, or one you can accept deserves your loyalty, is in the aleague. It would have to be a team without historic enmity towards your club to overcome 40 odd years of died in the wool support. Hmm - perhaps some new franchises without historic ties to existing NSL clubs would be a palatable team to follow. This way madness lies, does it not? I do not say your opinion of the aleague is irrelevant - just that I honestly don't care if you hate it, ignore it, or secretly respect and admire it; unless you watch it or attend their games regularly enough to have an opinion based on (current) experience with the league. Some of this discussion has been had in another thread sometime back along the lines of "would you support the aleague if your team was kicked out of it?". I know if the Roar was out I would have real trouble following another team and probably both despise the aleague and ignore it at the same time. At that point, from the perspective of an aleague supporter, I would no longer care what I thought about the aleague. Bottom line - I want our league to continue to improve to the point that it becomes attractive to a wider and broader community without using baits and lures. I am seeing improvement across several teams this season in terms of players, playing style and the introduction of new exciting faces. Improved football can lead to the return of jaded supporters and generate more community momentum than an advertising campaign or set of steak knives. That is why I am not worried about other (external) opinions at this point in time. We need our league to become more attractive before we can hold more than a cursory viewing, and I think we are heading in the right direction. But you would support the Roar if there was a second division, where the promise to rebuild bigger and better was at hand.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xi think the stigma of not being the best in the world will have alot to do with it. lets be honest, we are pretty mediocre at best. lets say all nations decided to be good at AFL or the NRL. would we still be the best in the world? not too sure Most other nations are not "the best in the world" either. But that doesn't mean their game is in crisis and nobody wants to watch it. Why are we so weird? Not weird, just "unique" lol. They don't have NRL, AFL & Cricket in various forms like here. Others have their turmoil in football but continue to stay as the numero ouno. So the million+ people (FFA numbers not mine) in this country that play, volunteer, spectate (whether that's local in person or overseas leagues on TV) or otherwise participate in soccer of some form don't support the A-league because of NRL and AFL and cricket??? How does that work? Its more complicated for soccer in Australia. There are other more established codes here. Always been issues. Many play, volunteer and watch tv but are not too passionate about ALeague like you and me. Too much infighting, Aussies in the past had been put off by flares and foreign club names. It's always been a hectic and colourful history. Unbundling (the bundle of cotton thread) should not be underestimated though. This could be the First and Only Restart to soccer in this country for all parties. It happened in our lifetime in this country with all the politics, which is astonishing alone. Adding new teams and implementing all the other principles that JJ mentioned is the way forward, even for some ex NSL teams to possibly get back to the top League. Your giving conflicting answers mate. So are Aussies not interested in A league because they hate wogs and flares or because they prefer NRL and footy? Are you saying they just dont like the sport itself or is it the Aleague that is on the nose? If 1mill+ are engaging in some way with soccer elsewhere I would assume the latter. Not conflicting at all, The A League has been abit on the nose through its history. Alot of the reasons that you have come up with are hard to argue against. It has not built up a high enough profile at the same time over the years as compared to the established codes in Australia. The FA and APL are tasked with trying to change the perceptions and stereotypes that football is wogball. They can do this through marketing and more exposure of their content. For one, as much as me and you understand flares, the mainstream find them revolting and insightful and that will never change on the macro scale. No argument there. Andy Harper is great to listen to about his study and findings about the roots of football and its journey in Australia. The A League is not yet the finished article as you know. As 1 mil+ are involved in soccer, it is not equating into enough interest in the A League. Other codes through their players often find themselves embroiled in hot water with issues but other codes are not wogball so they are easily forgiven, its just how it is. Hopefully with this reset that has recently occured, it is the one chance that football has to eventually change perceptions and start to make a dent within the Australian sporting landscape. I find that the product has improved already. The key argumemt from me though is that the 1 mil+ ( if that is even a real figure or even if it is less) who are involved in soccer dont need to be sold on the sport, they already like it in some form or another so NRL and AFL opinions do NOT (or should not) affect how these people see the game. Let me put it another way as I'd like your opinion on this and anyone else who wants to chime in, lets pretend the 1 mil+ that already like soccer in this country are the last people left in Australia..... this covid thing gets out of control and by some devine soccer God providence the only people left in Australia are those who either play the game, are involved in a club or are spectators of local and or international soccer (just a hypothetical scenario, no need for anyone to rush out and buy loo paper) .. That is 1 million people who like the sport and only 50k at best are watching the Aleague...... Market to them first and even a 15% increase is another 150K of supporters. Those 1mill+ are not being "serviced" why? That is the golden question. Federations overseas have national populations less than 1 million yet manage to run multiple divisions and a healthy soccer system, not to mention countries like Iceland who make World Cups with a population smaller than Geelong.... Other sports are NOT to blame mate nor is the attitude of bogan Australia, these are just excuses, we have a huge support base the FFA is just useless..... The 1 mil+ (whether it is or not), which are probably the commited and rusted on supporters, even they are sick to death of the federations constantly in conflict with the FFA up till now 'perhaps.' I believe the masses have been affected by constant negativity in Australia when it comes to soccer. State and Local governments favouring the other codes being prevalent for one. Also, Frank excluding teams with rich history has played a major role. The idea of de-wogafying the new A League 16-17 years ago was so the conflicting monocultures and bad practices like flares would cease. Its not the anglo Australian way and I understand that. WIth the new A League Frank's vision excluded alot of passionate supporters way back then and still today. The winter sport turned into a Fox summer sport, played often in 35+ degree heat, what!!! and the comp not being aligned with the rest of football in the lower tiers either. As for the wavering supporters, many have disappeared. They enjoy other sports and easily go away because football cannot find traction...till now hopefully. This come down to marketing and advertising which is non-existent. These supporters would come back. I became a rusted on supporter a while back. My early days were spent playing and following another sport, all the while keeping a slight interest in football. To me somehow, football became my no.1 sport and would of focussed on playing that if I had it over again. My interest grew through the success stories of the International team. I would go for Sydney Olympic if they were in the A League. If there was a team nonetheless exclusive to Southern Sydney in the A League, I would probably support them. Sydney fc cannot cover the City, North/West and the South of Sydney all at once, not for me. I don't follow a team in the top flight, although, I am enthused by the A League and want it to thrive for all the right reasons. If the comp can be mentioned in the same breathe as the Eredivisie, Swedish, Croatian, South Korean and other similar leagues, well thats a major win for me. I hope it can Now happen sooner rather than later. Look at the populations of Iceland. Uruguay and Croatia, yet they have very strong football comps. The A League can be like this. The Enemy of Football in Australia has firstly been itself, no question! After around 6-8 years of the initial A League, second division should of started to happen. By now, pro/rel may have been ready to be integrated. The A League should be at 14 or maybe 16 teams by now. Perception is also very important. The Afl has 18 teams, the Nrl have 16 teams and would love to be at 18 teams. The A League is only Now at 12 teams. The more teams, the healthier and more successful the sporting code looks. The NRL, known as something else then, had a 12 team comp back in 1981, when in 1982 Canberra and lllawarra were admitted. In those days, Johnny Warren would do a segment on soccer on a program called Sportsworld on channel 7, main host was League hard man Rex 'the Moose' Mossop. The A League could be perceived as 30-40 years behind today compared to where they should be, that's the perception that I mentioned. If the A League grows further, the culture will eventually get stronger I believe, football it will be passed down to younger fans as well. The NBL is not a competitor to the football codes so they are not judged on their few teams that they operate with and successfully in their own right. I can't stress how important the 'Unbundling' was man. Now the comp needs to rocket to 16 teams in my view. If I could I would add four teams over the next two seasons as a matter of urgency and let them find their way, on the job, like most occupations, Japan and MLS style/ I really hope you are right in throwing your faith behind this "unbundling" mate as to me it is just a business decision to allow the professional clubs to have greater control of the "product". Like any business they will fight tooth and nail to protect their market and in my mind this is counterproductive towards developing the football ecosystem I want to see in this country. You want both Japan and MLS style but they are two different things bud. Japan has a 100 year plan on how to develop all of football in their country - National men's, women's AND youth teams to be the best, for there to be 4 divisions of professional clubs and for their "soccer identity" to be the "Asian Brazil". The focus is on the sport of soccer not the economics of it. MLS just wants to keep expanding into different markets until saturation point has been reached and they have sucked every potential investor dollar that they can possible get. Success for them is how much money the owners make and how much merchandising they can do .... Sorry to me this just doesn't appeal at all.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAs somebody who is also a fan of women's sport it doesnt matter if I see the highest possible athletic people at the top of their game. All sport has the same drama, excitement, club connections, triumphs, fails etc... that makes sport something that consumes our weekends So to me it doesnt matter that the A League isnt the EPL, it is still the premier Australian league and for the first 6 years of the competition it actually meant something to me
Where the A League lost it for me was taking the initial necessary (arguably) model and keeping it as "the" product. Sport, first and foremost, should be competitive. This tired formula of teams taking it in turns in winning so fans dont get sad just doesnt cut it for me. Its like letting your nephew beat you in chess I enjoyed the W League in the early stages because even though there were only 1 or 2 competitive teams (those linked to Australian sports institutions), competition drives competition. Adelaide stepped up. Melbourne stepped up. Regions that didnt have much investment in the women's game stepped up, and the women's game as a whole has benefited. We see that in the Matildas. Now the league is more open and other teams can win it - because they earnt it (through one method or another). But the longer the W League goes on the more it is destined to be tarred with the same brush as the men's game (salary cap and other anti competitive measures so we can pretend regions are good) I havent watched a single A League game this season. I tried and turned it off after 30 seconds. I dont even check the results. I havent renewed my membership and I'm not going to either. Rigged sport is just tedious. And while some may argue wages largely determines who wins in an open competition, thats the professional game. Thats a national game. Even in the semi professional and amateur era there is always one driver that makes a region stronger than the other If you want balance, watch an under 12s local competition. If you want to see sport at the highest level in a country with a national framework, then accept that Gosford is not the best the country has to offer. If you can enjoy the world cup even though Australia cant win, but can improve that little bit each time, then you can enjoy the A League as a competitive league also Sorry but your narrative is counter-intuitive. You really enjoyed the A-League when the salary sap was strict. As the cap has been changed so that it doesn't reflect a cap at all you have lost interest as the larger teams dominate ever year. Also what is your obsession with Gosford? CCM have still won more domestically than Perth, Wellington, Melbourne City, WSW, Newcastle as well as Western United and Macarthur of course. Only Sydney, Victory, Brisbane and Adelaide with their FFA cup wins has been more successful. When all of them have won more than CCM you can start your obsession again. BTW - I'm happy for the cap to go - just don't follow your argument When the A League first launched there were only 2 regions with money for a game with zero interest. Setting up a professional national competition with 1 team per city and only 2 teams with money is destined for a Scotland scenario. Rightfully or wrongly, a salary cap helped distribute the players equally amongst the clubs to help the league grow a national professional status when the game had no money. It was only short term until the comp could get regions with more money (like they did with Gold Coast and TV deals), and also with more clubs from big cities. In my opinion, the initial league was a necessary evil, and with the salary cap largely a placebo I think the competition was "truer" The A League failed to move to the second step. It instead decided to box, label and package the initial league. The longer it goes, the more fake and transparent it becomes. Particularly as the players we are seeing are of a higher caliber than Muscat at the end of his career and Yorke at the end of his As for CCM, yes they have been successful, because we dont have an open league. We have already seen them fall off the pace with minimal allowances. This is literally the point I am making. You can boast about the success of CCM in a national league and the highest honours they have won because the league allows it. We let our nephew win a chess game I dont have a problem with CCM, Newcastle, Wollongong, Geelong or any regional team. I want to see them in the A League and wish them the best. The issue I have is they need to compete on their own merits and in the professional game that is player investment. Not rules prohibiting a club from signing too many good players so constant disruption forces an artificial shuffle each year Are you aware what would happen if the cap was removed, Crowd numbers would dwindle, scores more predictable, clubs less profitable, team numbers would reduce, talent coming through this would reduce, less qualification on an international stage as there is less talent, and Australia moves down the footballing ladder. Thats nothing more than fear based worst case scenario speculation Crowds have dwindled, attendances have dropped, clubs are less profitable, broadcasters arent bidding for our game, talent has dropped off, we are risking not qualifying even though Asia, we are poor in the ACL, football has moved down the ladder - and all of this was before COVID, and all with a salary cap Its ridiculous to think that Australia doesnt have the money and interest in a national competitive league based on choices made by two codes when they became professional. If the cap was dropped some of the teams in the A League will be the biggest football clubs of any code in this country. Your prediction - less interest. Less profit. Less talent etc... Based on what? You're kidding yourself if you think 12 teams the size of CCM is going to drive up interest, profit and talent. In fact spreading the best players across 12 clubs means even more diluted talent for the bigger clubs. Things are only going to get worse as we add more teams All this is based off your opinion. If you want to see what happens when finances aren't regulated have a look at the dying days of the NSL, club turn over was next level. Your view point is so much recycled and "copy and paste" from a previous era that you think the flaws of the game that I pointed out above are my opinion Secondly you think taking a single maximum figure and applying it to player salaries only is going to stop clubs from going broke. If the salary cap is about financial regulation then why is it the same for the big clubs as it is for the small clubs? Why have we seen A League clubs go broke, several might I add, despite a salary cap? Also you throw in the classic NSL line. You do realise that the NSL was a semi professional league with no major TV deal or commercial backing?Every single flaw you have pointed out in removing the salary cap is a fact of the current game. You dont know what it does. You just know our code will die without one Also the vast majority of ex NSL teams are still alive and well 16 years later... Sure some have seriously contracted in both support and economies, but they still exist.
|
|
|
Roar in me Blood
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xNo. When we have a product that generates its own demand those who don't care about the league now may get drawn in. Until then, it is our top level competition and as long as I have a team in it I will be interested myself. The best players will generally strive to play in the top flight of any sport to prove themselves against their peers. The best teams will generally strive to play in the top flight of their sport to prove that they should be there (Hi Mono). The aleague and wleague are the top level of 'domestic' football in this country. People will argue happily about whether that means the best players or not - but I do not believe anyone seriously disputes that these leagues are the top level competition in the country. People's opinions will not change that for me. I would say a lot of the people who don't care about the aleague don't care about soccer/football as a spectator sport at the domestic level. They may play it and love that without feeling any interest in going to watch others play it other than to watch our national team. Those who do go or have previously gone regularly to aleague matches are the people whose thoughts I find relevant - but only as far as learning what works or does not work with the game or league. This branch of the forum is based on what people think about the aleague - wouldn't read and post here if I did not care what they think. Hey Roar IMB, Happy New Year. Absolutely agree that the best teams will strive to play at the highest possible level, bit hard to do when you have been actively prevented from doing so for 16 years though wouldn't you say? "I would say a lot of the people who don't care about the aleague don't care about soccer/football as a spectator sport at the domestic level. They may play it and love that without feeling any interest in going to watch others play it other than to watch our national team."
I dont agree with your comment above though at all mate, sorry. I have been caring about soccer in this country for at least 40 years and have been a very present spectator for a huge chunk of that. Not caring about a closed off "league" of 10-12 odd teams doesnt mean that I wont follow my club whatever level they are in. If by some miracle of miracles that means we find ourselves in the A-League, will my opinions then automatically become relevant? My contention was that most people in this country don't care about the aleague or football as a spectator sport. The second part was to say that a subset of those people may even enjoy playing the game itself. The participation rate in football is huge - but the crowds aren't, relative to the numbers who do play (my opinion and not necessarily fact - happy to hear otherwise). I excluded the national team because we effectively get sell out crowds at the national level putting them in a category of their own. I agree that many people DO go to their clubs games, and was not meaning you have to support an aleague club or the aleague itself to have relevant opinions on football itself. When I said "Those who do go or have previously gone regularly to aleague matches are the people whose thoughts I find relevant - but only as far as learning what works or does not work with the game or league" I was referring to the topic specifically. I only really care about the aleague opinions of those who have been involved in it in some way. I don't care what people may think about the aleague if they have not been to or watched many aleague games. Thanks for clarifying. In this I agree and part of the reason why franchising insistence on geographical placement of teams based on population and participation, in my opinion doesn't work. The whole insistence of building a fan base where there are young families, or growth corridors of football mad immigrants is pie in the sky marketing stuff for me.. Also I agree, my opinions on anything Aleague are purely as a disinterested outsider if anything., but that does not take away my right to care about the state of the game in this country or attend as many games as I can get away with every season to support my club. You should care what people like me think about the A-league though as "fish where the fish are" and "converting the mainstream AFL and NRL masses" hasn't worked. You catch more flies with honey mate, and blaming Eurosnobs and NSL dinosaurs for the woes of the A-League isnt going to make them go away. We have to improve the flavour of our honey before we worry about selling it to people who have grown up eating their own local honey though. I do not believe you personally are likely to have any real interest in the aleague until your club, or one you can accept deserves your loyalty, is in the aleague. It would have to be a team without historic enmity towards your club to overcome 40 odd years of died in the wool support. Hmm - perhaps some new franchises without historic ties to existing NSL clubs would be a palatable team to follow. This way madness lies, does it not? I do not say your opinion of the aleague is irrelevant - just that I honestly don't care if you hate it, ignore it, or secretly respect and admire it; unless you watch it or attend their games regularly enough to have an opinion based on (current) experience with the league. Some of this discussion has been had in another thread sometime back along the lines of "would you support the aleague if your team was kicked out of it?". I know if the Roar was out I would have real trouble following another team and probably both despise the aleague and ignore it at the same time. At that point, from the perspective of an aleague supporter, I would no longer care what I thought about the aleague. Bottom line - I want our league to continue to improve to the point that it becomes attractive to a wider and broader community without using baits and lures. I am seeing improvement across several teams this season in terms of players, playing style and the introduction of new exciting faces. Improved football can lead to the return of jaded supporters and generate more community momentum than an advertising campaign or set of steak knives. That is why I am not worried about other (external) opinions at this point in time. We need our league to become more attractive before we can hold more than a cursory viewing, and I think we are heading in the right direction. But you would support the Roar if there was a second division, where the promise to rebuild bigger and better was at hand. Yes. Otherwise I would have to use an alt account on here. I would consider my opinion of the aleague itself at that point meaningless - until we won our way back up. To be honest, if we were relegated I would actually be more inclined to keep an eye on the aleague as an unoffiliated supporter. It is if we are kicked out for some reason that the aleague would be dead to me.
When I wear their colours, I am the club.
|
|
|
patjennings
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAs somebody who is also a fan of women's sport it doesnt matter if I see the highest possible athletic people at the top of their game. All sport has the same drama, excitement, club connections, triumphs, fails etc... that makes sport something that consumes our weekends So to me it doesnt matter that the A League isnt the EPL, it is still the premier Australian league and for the first 6 years of the competition it actually meant something to me
Where the A League lost it for me was taking the initial necessary (arguably) model and keeping it as "the" product. Sport, first and foremost, should be competitive. This tired formula of teams taking it in turns in winning so fans dont get sad just doesnt cut it for me. Its like letting your nephew beat you in chess I enjoyed the W League in the early stages because even though there were only 1 or 2 competitive teams (those linked to Australian sports institutions), competition drives competition. Adelaide stepped up. Melbourne stepped up. Regions that didnt have much investment in the women's game stepped up, and the women's game as a whole has benefited. We see that in the Matildas. Now the league is more open and other teams can win it - because they earnt it (through one method or another). But the longer the W League goes on the more it is destined to be tarred with the same brush as the men's game (salary cap and other anti competitive measures so we can pretend regions are good) I havent watched a single A League game this season. I tried and turned it off after 30 seconds. I dont even check the results. I havent renewed my membership and I'm not going to either. Rigged sport is just tedious. And while some may argue wages largely determines who wins in an open competition, thats the professional game. Thats a national game. Even in the semi professional and amateur era there is always one driver that makes a region stronger than the other If you want balance, watch an under 12s local competition. If you want to see sport at the highest level in a country with a national framework, then accept that Gosford is not the best the country has to offer. If you can enjoy the world cup even though Australia cant win, but can improve that little bit each time, then you can enjoy the A League as a competitive league also Sorry but your narrative is counter-intuitive. You really enjoyed the A-League when the salary sap was strict. As the cap has been changed so that it doesn't reflect a cap at all you have lost interest as the larger teams dominate ever year. Also what is your obsession with Gosford? CCM have still won more domestically than Perth, Wellington, Melbourne City, WSW, Newcastle as well as Western United and Macarthur of course. Only Sydney, Victory, Brisbane and Adelaide with their FFA cup wins has been more successful. When all of them have won more than CCM you can start your obsession again. BTW - I'm happy for the cap to go - just don't follow your argument When the A League first launched there were only 2 regions with money for a game with zero interest. Setting up a professional national competition with 1 team per city and only 2 teams with money is destined for a Scotland scenario. Rightfully or wrongly, a salary cap helped distribute the players equally amongst the clubs to help the league grow a national professional status when the game had no money. It was only short term until the comp could get regions with more money (like they did with Gold Coast and TV deals), and also with more clubs from big cities. In my opinion, the initial league was a necessary evil, and with the salary cap largely a placebo I think the competition was "truer" The A League failed to move to the second step. It instead decided to box, label and package the initial league. The longer it goes, the more fake and transparent it becomes. Particularly as the players we are seeing are of a higher caliber than Muscat at the end of his career and Yorke at the end of his As for CCM, yes they have been successful, because we dont have an open league. We have already seen them fall off the pace with minimal allowances. This is literally the point I am making. You can boast about the success of CCM in a national league and the highest honours they have won because the league allows it. We let our nephew win a chess game I dont have a problem with CCM, Newcastle, Wollongong, Geelong or any regional team. I want to see them in the A League and wish them the best. The issue I have is they need to compete on their own merits and in the professional game that is player investment. Not rules prohibiting a club from signing too many good players so constant disruption forces an artificial shuffle each year Are you aware what would happen if the cap was removed, Crowd numbers would dwindle, scores more predictable, clubs less profitable, team numbers would reduce, talent coming through this would reduce, less qualification on an international stage as there is less talent, and Australia moves down the footballing ladder. Thats nothing more than fear based worst case scenario speculation Crowds have dwindled, attendances have dropped, clubs are less profitable, broadcasters arent bidding for our game, talent has dropped off, we are risking not qualifying even though Asia, we are poor in the ACL, football has moved down the ladder - and all of this was before COVID, and all with a salary cap Its ridiculous to think that Australia doesnt have the money and interest in a national competitive league based on choices made by two codes when they became professional. If the cap was dropped some of the teams in the A League will be the biggest football clubs of any code in this country. Your prediction - less interest. Less profit. Less talent etc... Based on what? You're kidding yourself if you think 12 teams the size of CCM is going to drive up interest, profit and talent. In fact spreading the best players across 12 clubs means even more diluted talent for the bigger clubs. Things are only going to get worse as we add more teams All this is based off your opinion. If you want to see what happens when finances aren't regulated have a look at the dying days of the NSL, club turn over was next level. Your view point is so much recycled and "copy and paste" from a previous era that you think the flaws of the game that I pointed out above are my opinion Secondly you think taking a single maximum figure and applying it to player salaries only is going to stop clubs from going broke. If the salary cap is about financial regulation then why is it the same for the big clubs as it is for the small clubs? Why have we seen A League clubs go broke, several might I add, despite a salary cap? Also you throw in the classic NSL line. You do realise that the NSL was a semi professional league with no major TV deal or commercial backing?Every single flaw you have pointed out in removing the salary cap is a fact of the current game. You dont know what it does. You just know our code will die without one Wasn't the Phillips Soccer League and Coca-Cola Soccer League shown on channel 10. I think Eddie Everywhere may have also been involved.
|
|
|
bluebird2
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 648,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAs somebody who is also a fan of women's sport it doesnt matter if I see the highest possible athletic people at the top of their game. All sport has the same drama, excitement, club connections, triumphs, fails etc... that makes sport something that consumes our weekends So to me it doesnt matter that the A League isnt the EPL, it is still the premier Australian league and for the first 6 years of the competition it actually meant something to me
Where the A League lost it for me was taking the initial necessary (arguably) model and keeping it as "the" product. Sport, first and foremost, should be competitive. This tired formula of teams taking it in turns in winning so fans dont get sad just doesnt cut it for me. Its like letting your nephew beat you in chess I enjoyed the W League in the early stages because even though there were only 1 or 2 competitive teams (those linked to Australian sports institutions), competition drives competition. Adelaide stepped up. Melbourne stepped up. Regions that didnt have much investment in the women's game stepped up, and the women's game as a whole has benefited. We see that in the Matildas. Now the league is more open and other teams can win it - because they earnt it (through one method or another). But the longer the W League goes on the more it is destined to be tarred with the same brush as the men's game (salary cap and other anti competitive measures so we can pretend regions are good) I havent watched a single A League game this season. I tried and turned it off after 30 seconds. I dont even check the results. I havent renewed my membership and I'm not going to either. Rigged sport is just tedious. And while some may argue wages largely determines who wins in an open competition, thats the professional game. Thats a national game. Even in the semi professional and amateur era there is always one driver that makes a region stronger than the other If you want balance, watch an under 12s local competition. If you want to see sport at the highest level in a country with a national framework, then accept that Gosford is not the best the country has to offer. If you can enjoy the world cup even though Australia cant win, but can improve that little bit each time, then you can enjoy the A League as a competitive league also Sorry but your narrative is counter-intuitive. You really enjoyed the A-League when the salary sap was strict. As the cap has been changed so that it doesn't reflect a cap at all you have lost interest as the larger teams dominate ever year. Also what is your obsession with Gosford? CCM have still won more domestically than Perth, Wellington, Melbourne City, WSW, Newcastle as well as Western United and Macarthur of course. Only Sydney, Victory, Brisbane and Adelaide with their FFA cup wins has been more successful. When all of them have won more than CCM you can start your obsession again. BTW - I'm happy for the cap to go - just don't follow your argument When the A League first launched there were only 2 regions with money for a game with zero interest. Setting up a professional national competition with 1 team per city and only 2 teams with money is destined for a Scotland scenario. Rightfully or wrongly, a salary cap helped distribute the players equally amongst the clubs to help the league grow a national professional status when the game had no money. It was only short term until the comp could get regions with more money (like they did with Gold Coast and TV deals), and also with more clubs from big cities. In my opinion, the initial league was a necessary evil, and with the salary cap largely a placebo I think the competition was "truer" The A League failed to move to the second step. It instead decided to box, label and package the initial league. The longer it goes, the more fake and transparent it becomes. Particularly as the players we are seeing are of a higher caliber than Muscat at the end of his career and Yorke at the end of his As for CCM, yes they have been successful, because we dont have an open league. We have already seen them fall off the pace with minimal allowances. This is literally the point I am making. You can boast about the success of CCM in a national league and the highest honours they have won because the league allows it. We let our nephew win a chess game I dont have a problem with CCM, Newcastle, Wollongong, Geelong or any regional team. I want to see them in the A League and wish them the best. The issue I have is they need to compete on their own merits and in the professional game that is player investment. Not rules prohibiting a club from signing too many good players so constant disruption forces an artificial shuffle each year Are you aware what would happen if the cap was removed, Crowd numbers would dwindle, scores more predictable, clubs less profitable, team numbers would reduce, talent coming through this would reduce, less qualification on an international stage as there is less talent, and Australia moves down the footballing ladder. Thats nothing more than fear based worst case scenario speculation Crowds have dwindled, attendances have dropped, clubs are less profitable, broadcasters arent bidding for our game, talent has dropped off, we are risking not qualifying even though Asia, we are poor in the ACL, football has moved down the ladder - and all of this was before COVID, and all with a salary cap Its ridiculous to think that Australia doesnt have the money and interest in a national competitive league based on choices made by two codes when they became professional. If the cap was dropped some of the teams in the A League will be the biggest football clubs of any code in this country. Your prediction - less interest. Less profit. Less talent etc... Based on what? You're kidding yourself if you think 12 teams the size of CCM is going to drive up interest, profit and talent. In fact spreading the best players across 12 clubs means even more diluted talent for the bigger clubs. Things are only going to get worse as we add more teams All this is based off your opinion. If you want to see what happens when finances aren't regulated have a look at the dying days of the NSL, club turn over was next level. Your view point is so much recycled and "copy and paste" from a previous era that you think the flaws of the game that I pointed out above are my opinion Secondly you think taking a single maximum figure and applying it to player salaries only is going to stop clubs from going broke. If the salary cap is about financial regulation then why is it the same for the big clubs as it is for the small clubs? Why have we seen A League clubs go broke, several might I add, despite a salary cap? Also you throw in the classic NSL line. You do realise that the NSL was a semi professional league with no major TV deal or commercial backing?Every single flaw you have pointed out in removing the salary cap is a fact of the current game. You dont know what it does. You just know our code will die without one Wasn't the Phillips Soccer League and Coca-Cola Soccer League shown on channel 10. I think Eddie Everywhere may have also been involved. The key word was "major" Soccer Australia had a TV deal and I think it was $1mil in total for 7 years
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xNo. When we have a product that generates its own demand those who don't care about the league now may get drawn in. Until then, it is our top level competition and as long as I have a team in it I will be interested myself. The best players will generally strive to play in the top flight of any sport to prove themselves against their peers. The best teams will generally strive to play in the top flight of their sport to prove that they should be there (Hi Mono). The aleague and wleague are the top level of 'domestic' football in this country. People will argue happily about whether that means the best players or not - but I do not believe anyone seriously disputes that these leagues are the top level competition in the country. People's opinions will not change that for me. I would say a lot of the people who don't care about the aleague don't care about soccer/football as a spectator sport at the domestic level. They may play it and love that without feeling any interest in going to watch others play it other than to watch our national team. Those who do go or have previously gone regularly to aleague matches are the people whose thoughts I find relevant - but only as far as learning what works or does not work with the game or league. This branch of the forum is based on what people think about the aleague - wouldn't read and post here if I did not care what they think. Hey Roar IMB, Happy New Year. Absolutely agree that the best teams will strive to play at the highest possible level, bit hard to do when you have been actively prevented from doing so for 16 years though wouldn't you say? "I would say a lot of the people who don't care about the aleague don't care about soccer/football as a spectator sport at the domestic level. They may play it and love that without feeling any interest in going to watch others play it other than to watch our national team."
I dont agree with your comment above though at all mate, sorry. I have been caring about soccer in this country for at least 40 years and have been a very present spectator for a huge chunk of that. Not caring about a closed off "league" of 10-12 odd teams doesnt mean that I wont follow my club whatever level they are in. If by some miracle of miracles that means we find ourselves in the A-League, will my opinions then automatically become relevant? My contention was that most people in this country don't care about the aleague or football as a spectator sport. The second part was to say that a subset of those people may even enjoy playing the game itself. The participation rate in football is huge - but the crowds aren't, relative to the numbers who do play (my opinion and not necessarily fact - happy to hear otherwise). I excluded the national team because we effectively get sell out crowds at the national level putting them in a category of their own. I agree that many people DO go to their clubs games, and was not meaning you have to support an aleague club or the aleague itself to have relevant opinions on football itself. When I said "Those who do go or have previously gone regularly to aleague matches are the people whose thoughts I find relevant - but only as far as learning what works or does not work with the game or league" I was referring to the topic specifically. I only really care about the aleague opinions of those who have been involved in it in some way. I don't care what people may think about the aleague if they have not been to or watched many aleague games. Thanks for clarifying. In this I agree and part of the reason why franchising insistence on geographical placement of teams based on population and participation, in my opinion doesn't work. The whole insistence of building a fan base where there are young families, or growth corridors of football mad immigrants is pie in the sky marketing stuff for me.. Also I agree, my opinions on anything Aleague are purely as a disinterested outsider if anything., but that does not take away my right to care about the state of the game in this country or attend as many games as I can get away with every season to support my club. You should care what people like me think about the A-league though as "fish where the fish are" and "converting the mainstream AFL and NRL masses" hasn't worked. You catch more flies with honey mate, and blaming Eurosnobs and NSL dinosaurs for the woes of the A-League isnt going to make them go away. We have to improve the flavour of our honey before we worry about selling it to people who have grown up eating their own local honey though. I do not believe you personally are likely to have any real interest in the aleague until your club, or one you can accept deserves your loyalty, is in the aleague. It would have to be a team without historic enmity towards your club to overcome 40 odd years of died in the wool support. Hmm - perhaps some new franchises without historic ties to existing NSL clubs would be a palatable team to follow. This way madness lies, does it not? I do not say your opinion of the aleague is irrelevant - just that I honestly don't care if you hate it, ignore it, or secretly respect and admire it; unless you watch it or attend their games regularly enough to have an opinion based on (current) experience with the league. Some of this discussion has been had in another thread sometime back along the lines of "would you support the aleague if your team was kicked out of it?". I know if the Roar was out I would have real trouble following another team and probably both despise the aleague and ignore it at the same time. At that point, from the perspective of an aleague supporter, I would no longer care what I thought about the aleague. Bottom line - I want our league to continue to improve to the point that it becomes attractive to a wider and broader community without using baits and lures. I am seeing improvement across several teams this season in terms of players, playing style and the introduction of new exciting faces. Improved football can lead to the return of jaded supporters and generate more community momentum than an advertising campaign or set of steak knives. That is why I am not worried about other (external) opinions at this point in time. We need our league to become more attractive before we can hold more than a cursory viewing, and I think we are heading in the right direction. But you would support the Roar if there was a second division, where the promise to rebuild bigger and better was at hand. Yes. Otherwise I would have to use an alt account on here. I would consider my opinion of the aleague itself at that point meaningless - until we won our way back up. To be honest, if we were relegated I would actually be more inclined to keep an eye on the aleague as an unoffiliated supporter. It is if we are kicked out for some reason that the aleague would be dead to me. Sincerely hope this never happens to you mate, it is an absolutely horrid feeling being ostracized for no reason. I agree with your post 100% as I have mentioned before, if there was even a remote chance South could be promoted I would also "keep an eye out" for the Aleague.
|
|
|
patjennings
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAs somebody who is also a fan of women's sport it doesnt matter if I see the highest possible athletic people at the top of their game. All sport has the same drama, excitement, club connections, triumphs, fails etc... that makes sport something that consumes our weekends So to me it doesnt matter that the A League isnt the EPL, it is still the premier Australian league and for the first 6 years of the competition it actually meant something to me
Where the A League lost it for me was taking the initial necessary (arguably) model and keeping it as "the" product. Sport, first and foremost, should be competitive. This tired formula of teams taking it in turns in winning so fans dont get sad just doesnt cut it for me. Its like letting your nephew beat you in chess I enjoyed the W League in the early stages because even though there were only 1 or 2 competitive teams (those linked to Australian sports institutions), competition drives competition. Adelaide stepped up. Melbourne stepped up. Regions that didnt have much investment in the women's game stepped up, and the women's game as a whole has benefited. We see that in the Matildas. Now the league is more open and other teams can win it - because they earnt it (through one method or another). But the longer the W League goes on the more it is destined to be tarred with the same brush as the men's game (salary cap and other anti competitive measures so we can pretend regions are good) I havent watched a single A League game this season. I tried and turned it off after 30 seconds. I dont even check the results. I havent renewed my membership and I'm not going to either. Rigged sport is just tedious. And while some may argue wages largely determines who wins in an open competition, thats the professional game. Thats a national game. Even in the semi professional and amateur era there is always one driver that makes a region stronger than the other If you want balance, watch an under 12s local competition. If you want to see sport at the highest level in a country with a national framework, then accept that Gosford is not the best the country has to offer. If you can enjoy the world cup even though Australia cant win, but can improve that little bit each time, then you can enjoy the A League as a competitive league also Sorry but your narrative is counter-intuitive. You really enjoyed the A-League when the salary sap was strict. As the cap has been changed so that it doesn't reflect a cap at all you have lost interest as the larger teams dominate ever year. Also what is your obsession with Gosford? CCM have still won more domestically than Perth, Wellington, Melbourne City, WSW, Newcastle as well as Western United and Macarthur of course. Only Sydney, Victory, Brisbane and Adelaide with their FFA cup wins has been more successful. When all of them have won more than CCM you can start your obsession again. BTW - I'm happy for the cap to go - just don't follow your argument When the A League first launched there were only 2 regions with money for a game with zero interest. Setting up a professional national competition with 1 team per city and only 2 teams with money is destined for a Scotland scenario. Rightfully or wrongly, a salary cap helped distribute the players equally amongst the clubs to help the league grow a national professional status when the game had no money. It was only short term until the comp could get regions with more money (like they did with Gold Coast and TV deals), and also with more clubs from big cities. In my opinion, the initial league was a necessary evil, and with the salary cap largely a placebo I think the competition was "truer" The A League failed to move to the second step. It instead decided to box, label and package the initial league. The longer it goes, the more fake and transparent it becomes. Particularly as the players we are seeing are of a higher caliber than Muscat at the end of his career and Yorke at the end of his As for CCM, yes they have been successful, because we dont have an open league. We have already seen them fall off the pace with minimal allowances. This is literally the point I am making. You can boast about the success of CCM in a national league and the highest honours they have won because the league allows it. We let our nephew win a chess game I dont have a problem with CCM, Newcastle, Wollongong, Geelong or any regional team. I want to see them in the A League and wish them the best. The issue I have is they need to compete on their own merits and in the professional game that is player investment. Not rules prohibiting a club from signing too many good players so constant disruption forces an artificial shuffle each year Are you aware what would happen if the cap was removed, Crowd numbers would dwindle, scores more predictable, clubs less profitable, team numbers would reduce, talent coming through this would reduce, less qualification on an international stage as there is less talent, and Australia moves down the footballing ladder. Thats nothing more than fear based worst case scenario speculation Crowds have dwindled, attendances have dropped, clubs are less profitable, broadcasters arent bidding for our game, talent has dropped off, we are risking not qualifying even though Asia, we are poor in the ACL, football has moved down the ladder - and all of this was before COVID, and all with a salary cap Its ridiculous to think that Australia doesnt have the money and interest in a national competitive league based on choices made by two codes when they became professional. If the cap was dropped some of the teams in the A League will be the biggest football clubs of any code in this country. Your prediction - less interest. Less profit. Less talent etc... Based on what? You're kidding yourself if you think 12 teams the size of CCM is going to drive up interest, profit and talent. In fact spreading the best players across 12 clubs means even more diluted talent for the bigger clubs. Things are only going to get worse as we add more teams All this is based off your opinion. If you want to see what happens when finances aren't regulated have a look at the dying days of the NSL, club turn over was next level. Your view point is so much recycled and "copy and paste" from a previous era that you think the flaws of the game that I pointed out above are my opinion Secondly you think taking a single maximum figure and applying it to player salaries only is going to stop clubs from going broke. If the salary cap is about financial regulation then why is it the same for the big clubs as it is for the small clubs? Why have we seen A League clubs go broke, several might I add, despite a salary cap? Also you throw in the classic NSL line. You do realise that the NSL was a semi professional league with no major TV deal or commercial backing?Every single flaw you have pointed out in removing the salary cap is a fact of the current game. You dont know what it does. You just know our code will die without one Wasn't the Phillips Soccer League and Coca-Cola Soccer League shown on channel 10. I think Eddie Everywhere may have also been involved. The key word was "major" Soccer Australia had a TV deal and I think it was $1mil in total for 7 years That was a long time ago in an era of inflation and at least was on a major channel. What would that be in 2005 when the first season of the A-League got $750000 on subscription TV? Realistically that NSL TV deal had better access and was better value than the first A-League deal.
|
|
|
heyitsrobbie1984
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 160,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xi think the stigma of not being the best in the world will have alot to do with it. lets be honest, we are pretty mediocre at best. lets say all nations decided to be good at AFL or the NRL. would we still be the best in the world? not too sure Most other nations are not "the best in the world" either. But that doesn't mean their game is in crisis and nobody wants to watch it. Why are we so weird? not weird at all. we just want and demand the best and we refused to accept that our league isn't the best in our region. We aussies will not settle for second best. its who we are
|
|
|
localstar
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xi think the stigma of not being the best in the world will have alot to do with it. lets be honest, we are pretty mediocre at best. lets say all nations decided to be good at AFL or the NRL. would we still be the best in the world? not too sure Most other nations are not "the best in the world" either. But that doesn't mean their game is in crisis and nobody wants to watch it. Why are we so weird? not weird at all. we just want and demand the best and we refused to accept that our league isn't the best in our region. We aussies will not settle for second best. its who we are LOL..!
|
|
|