scouse_roar
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Smith's shot - hilarious!
|
|
|
|
Gooner4life_8
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
At least there's plenty of time left, if they can clean up Australia by the end of today, we'll have two full days to chase down a total however big or small.
|
|
|
Funky Munky
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
Englands only hope now, is that Perth flattens out heaps on days 4 and 5. The Saffies will vouch for that.
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
Funky Munky wrote:Englands only hope now, is that Perth flattens out heaps on days 4 and 5. The Saffies will vouch for that. This. If Australia get to Tea and are 6 down and Haddin and Johnson are in. Well lets just say I wouldn't be looking forward to that as an English bowler.
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
England waste another appeal. Both teams with 1 left now.
|
|
|
Gooner4life_8
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:England waste another appeal. Both teams with 1 left now. Wasted!? Wasted!? That fucking well should have been out FFS!!! According to hawk-eye it says it was clearly hitting the stumps, what's the point of using technology if you don't take it's advice, this half a ball rule is bullshit. Of course hawk-eye isn't 100% accurate and I can see why when only the ball only snicks the stumps the desiscion is overturned but when that much of the ball is hitting the stumps I don't see why that should be given not out, FFS!! THIS DESISCION REFERRAL SYSTEM IS FUCKED!!!!!!! :evil: :evil: :evil: /end rant.
|
|
|
manufan4life
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Gooner4life_8 wrote:sydneycroatia58 wrote:England waste another appeal. Both teams with 1 left now. Wasted!? Wasted!? That fucking well should have been out FFS!!! According to hawk-eye it says it was clearly hitting the stumps, what's the point of using technology if you don't take it's advice, this half a ball rule is bullshit. Of course hawk-eye isn't 100% accurate and I can see why when only the ball only snicks the stumps the desiscion is overturned but when that much of the ball is hitting the stumps I don't see why that should be given not out, FFS!! THIS DESISCION REFERRAL SYSTEM IS FUCKED!!!!!!! :evil: :evil: :evil: /end rant. Maybe you should learn the rules, the middle of the ball has to hit the stumps, if this doesnt happen then the decision is not overturned, otherwise we could have decisions given out when the ball is just flicking the off or leg stump.
|
|
|
Gooner4life_8
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
I know the rules and I think they're bullshit!
Very frustrated at the moment :lol:
|
|
|
Funky Munky
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
manufan4life wrote:Gooner4life_8 wrote:sydneycroatia58 wrote:England waste another appeal. Both teams with 1 left now. Wasted!? Wasted!? That fucking well should have been out FFS!!! According to hawk-eye it says it was clearly hitting the stumps, what's the point of using technology if you don't take it's advice, this half a ball rule is bullshit. Of course hawk-eye isn't 100% accurate and I can see why when only the ball only snicks the stumps the desiscion is overturned but when that much of the ball is hitting the stumps I don't see why that should be given not out, FFS!! THIS DESISCION REFERRAL SYSTEM IS FUCKED!!!!!!! :evil: :evil: :evil: /end rant. Maybe you should learn the rules, the middle of the ball has to hit the stumps, if this doesnt happen then the decision is not overturned, otherwise we could have decisions given out when the ball is just flicking the off or leg stump. True, but to me, that's just over ruling the original rules of cricket. Doesn't matter how much of the ball is hitting the stumps, if it's hitting the stumps, it's out. Those should be given IMO.
|
|
|
Gooner4life_8
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
Thank you Funky, now I know I'm not just a frustrated bias Englishman :lol:
|
|
|
manufan4life
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.9K,
Visits: 0
|
When i saw it I thought it was out, and i still do. But however the system is in place for a reason, and i can't say i really do approve of it. Especially with dubious areas such as LBW.
|
|
|
Gooner4life_8
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
YEESSS!!!! Smith walks, big glove on that, finally a breakthrough!
|
|
|
buddha69
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Gooner4life_8 wrote:YEESSS!!!! Smith walks, big glove on that, finally a breakthrough! Damn.
|
|
|
Funky Munky
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
Still not convinced Smith is a Test number 6 tbh.
|
|
|
Gooner4life_8
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
That was a weird noise just then, went up thinking that was a big nick then :lol:
|
|
|
buddha69
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Funky Munky wrote:Still not convinced Smith is a Test number 6 tbh. I don't believe he is.
|
|
|
Gooner4life_8
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
OH FUCK! Haddin gets off the mark with a six.
|
|
|
MidfieldMaestro
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Funky Munky wrote:Still not convinced Smith is a Test number 6 tbh. I'm baffled enough that he bats at 6 for Australia, then I was even more baffled when I learnt that he bats at 4 for NSW!
|
|
|
Gooner4life_8
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
MidfieldMaestro wrote:then I was even more baffled when I learnt that he bats at 4 for NSW! I'm not too surprised about that, he can bat and there's a difference between first class and test cricket.
|
|
|
Gooner4life_8
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
Oh yes, fucking superb fielding by Finn there =d>
|
|
|
MidfieldMaestro
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Gooner4life_8 wrote:MidfieldMaestro wrote:then I was even more baffled when I learnt that he bats at 4 for NSW! I'm not too surprised about that, he can bat and there's a difference between first class and test cricket. True, I haven't seen a lot of his batting, but for a guy who bats at 4 in first class cricket, he has looked extremely uncomfortable and uncharacteristically shaky early on in his innings in this test match (for a first class #4).
|
|
|
MidfieldMaestro
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Tremlett is proving to be a very handy replacement for Broad.
|
|
|
Funky Munky
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
England with just a little sniff here. Roll em for under a 400 lead, they'd be fairly confident about chasing.
|
|
|
Gooner4life_8
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
100 for Hussey
geez, I go away and miss a wicket, then Colly grabs one \:d/ England are indeed in with a little sniff :d
|
|
|
Gooner4life_8
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
Now Harris is gone! \:d/
|
|
|
Funky Munky
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
Amazing how similar this is running out to the Saffie win I mentioned above. Just with lower totals.
|
|
|
Gooner4life_8
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
Siddle gone!
|
|
|
Gooner4life_8
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
And Australia are cleaned up, five for Tremlett and England are left with 2 days and 1 session to chase 390...
|
|
|
avy1990
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
2-3 Wickets tonight would be magical.
|
|
|
The Doctor
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
Gooner4life_8 wrote:And Australia are cleaned up, five for Tremlett and England are left with 2 days and 1 session to chase 390... no need to worry about time... you've got 10 wickets.... 5 if Johnson gets a roll on tonight ;)
|
|
|