macktheknife wrote:Chiro is garbage junk pseudo-medicine, with it's core tenant being problems resulting from 'Vertebral subluxation' is junk science. Any relationship with actual medicine comes only from randomly matching other effective manual skeletal therapy.
Totally agree.
Which begs the question, for those chiros practicing true skeletal therapy, how do they differ from a physio? And if they don't differ, shouldn't chiropractic be binned and there be a greater intake for physiotherapy?