kapow! wrote:Arthur wrote:kapow! wrote:lol i don't give a fuk what qualifications you have.
The point was not whether 9-12yrs is an important age group for the development of coordination/development, but whether coaching was the main difference maker to improve a player at that age - that was the claim.
If it was we'd expect the best clubs targeting players at 8 yrs of age and to have a vastly improved development record wouldn't we?
But there are so many intangibles not yet understood in the development of a player that it doesn't work out like that.
The FFA can take some guidelines based on what other countries do, those countries you mentioned have different systems but lets not assume there is an agreed base of the best way to develop a player either.
I just give up, its no longer worth the angst.
You need another hobby other than attention seeking old man.
Attention seeking?](*,)
Arthur provides a lot of interesting links for other coaches to read on 442.
A lot of 442 members are pleased that Arthur posts so many thought provoking football articles.
I was trying to explain an elite practice with words on 442, which I find brilliant, and Arthur coincidentally posted a video for the same exercise. I'll be referring about 30 coaches to the same link. Expertise is being disseminated more widely through Arthur's decentric (the genuine context of the word) pursuits.
Conversely, your 442 involvement is essentially egocentric. You take a contrary view on most issues to gain attention. ](*,)