Priest wrote:Awesome. Tell us about how it's got no chance of going to the supreme court again because there is no case against the FFV :lol:
I said it was "unlikely" (I see no substantive point of law but a magistrate still may), and
the plaintiffs are further away from the Supreme Court today than they were when I said this. Regardless, my character assessment of you remains and is demonstrated further with every post you make.