Inside Sport

If lawful firearm owners cause most gun deaths, what can we do?


https://forum.insidesport.com.au/Topic2237328.aspx

By Murdoch Rags Ltd - 7 Oct 2015 9:48 AM

Quote:
In the frustrating struggle to identify gun killers in advance, we could have been looking in the wrong place. By accepting the common mantra that law-abiding, licensed firearm owners are not the problem, many have chased popular fears such as mental illness and violent video games.

Research now shows that far more frequently, perpetrators share one common thread. In mass shootings, in gun homicide and particularly in much more common gun deaths, the killer is frequently, until that moment, a law-abiding firearm owner pulling the trigger on a lawfully held gun.

In the 16 deadliest mass shootings in Europe between 1987 and 2015, 86% of the victims were shot by a licensed shooter. In at least 29 American mass gun killings since 2007, 139 people were killed by licensed firearm owners with hidden handgun permits.

In 16 mass shootings in Australia and New Zealand between 1987 and 2014, 135 people died. Most of the victims – 55% – were shot by previously law-abiding, licensed gun owners using legally held firearms.

It’s hard to imagine a motorists’ lobby group insisting that licensed drivers should be left alone on the roads, and that the problem is unlicensed drivers. Yet gun owners have been making this claim for decades.

This begs the question: are licensed gun owners automatically good citizens? As with licensed motorists, the evidence says no......
https://theconversation.com/if-lawful-firearm-owners-cause-most-gun-deaths-what-can-we-do-48567
By Benjamin - 9 Oct 2015 1:29 PM

Scotch&Coke wrote:
trident wrote:
AzzaMarch wrote:
It will NEVER change in America, no matter how many lives would be saved.

- The structure of their political system (compared to ours) makes it very hard to bring in top-down changes
- The country is awash with guns, there are more guns than people
- The way their Supreme Court has interpreted the 2nd amendment means they would have to change their constitution to rescind gun rights
- As a society they just have different values - seemingly their "right to bear arms" is just more important to them than the right to live with a low likelihood of getting shot!


so change the constitution!


You might as well try and change the Bible. The same shit storm will be kicked up with potential patriot groups literally trying to rise up and take on the Government and its military. People are being influenced by fear mongers and people who are scared do really stupid things


Constitution has been amended numerous over the last two centuries. Including at least one amendment which directly contradicted a previous amendment. The alternative to changing the amendment would be to load the Supreme Court with anti-gun judges, then challenge the legal definition of the 2nd amendment and have it re-interpreted.