Inside Sport

Why the Dutch seem to have forgotten how to play soccer


https://forum.insidesport.com.au/Topic2241495.aspx

By Barca4Life - 15 Oct 2015 10:30 AM

After the fallout of their recent failure, Simon Kuper argues they lost their own identity.

He makes some interest point that also relates to us(Australian Football) as well.

Quote:
The last foreigner to manage Holland was Austrian Ernst Happel. Once a teenage solder in Hitler's army on the Russian front, Happel landed in the Dutch league in the 1960s. He never learned much Dutch, which didn't matter as he rarely spoke, preferring to smoke instead. Famously, he would win his players' respect by placing a bottle on the crossbar during a training session, then knocking it off with one shot of the ball. Mostly, he just drank cognac and played cards.

In 1978, Happel coached Holland to the World Cup final. He died in 1992 -- of lung cancer, unsurprisingly -- but now the time may have come to reincarnate him. I've supported Holland for nearly 40 years, since moving to the country as a child, and have never seen the team at such a low ebb as it is today. It's not just that the Dutch will miss Euro 2016 after a string of humiliating defeats to mid-ranking nations. It's that, like Brazil, Holland seems not to know how to play soccer anymore. The country's traditional style no longer works. Once the world's most intelligent soccer nation, Holland needs to reinvent its game from scratch, probably under foreign direction.

The most obvious layer of the problem is individual quality. The great generation born in 1983 and 1984 is fading. Wesley Sneijder and Robin van Persie announced after Tuesday's 2-3 home defeat to the Czech Republic that they planned to keep playing for Holland, and Van Persie has gone even further. "I want to play for Oranje until I'm 38 or 40," he said recently. "The longest of everyone. That's one of my career goals."

But Van Persie's words suggest a weak grip on reality. Aged 32, he already alternates between scowling alone on Fenerbahce's bench and sitting on Holland's. In this week's double-header against Kazakhstan and the Czech Republic, he won his 100th and 101st caps as a sub, but distinguished himself chiefly through a childish squabble with Memphis Depay in training, and a hilarious headed own goal for the Czechs (though he did later notch a late non-consolation goal for Holland).

Arjen Robben, at 31 still easily the best Dutch player, now injured again, may have something to contribute in the future. His individual genius coupled with the defensive wall erected by Louis van Gaal took Holland to third place in last year's World Cup. But apart from Robben, Holland needs to build on a new generation.

Unfortunately, it isn't a good one. Ajax, the main source of Dutch talent since the 1970s, has produced at best one top-class Dutchman aged under 30, Daley Blind. (The next most prominent Dutch under-30 homegrown Ajax exports may be PSG's reserve Gregory van der Wiel, Ryan Babel of Al Ain in the United Arab Emirates, and Siem de Jong and Vurnon Anita of Newcastle.)

Study Blind, and you come to Dutch soccer's broader problem. He is the best version of the modern Dutch player: clever, comfortable in several positions, a good passer, but neither fast nor strong nor a good tackler or header.

Dutch soccer has reduced the complex game to the pass -- and the short pass at that. As Dutch journalist Michiel de Hoog and data analyst Sander IJtsma diagnosed this week, the Dutch game has degenerated into harmless passing around one's own defense. It's the style that Arsene Wenger has called "sterile domination": you have the ball, but you don't threaten.

Johan Cruyff, father of Dutch soccer, complains: "Holland is world champion [of] passing sideways and back. The buildup is currently the weakest aspect of our game." Barcelona and Germany pass fast near the opposition's goal; Holland passes slowly near its own. The opposition watches the Dutch "knit" until the moment comes to intercept a pass and break.

Germany, Belgium and Spain -- Holland's role models as it starts to rebuild -- produce passers too. Almost every player in Germany's team, even goalkeeper Manuel Neuer, passes like a midfield playmaker. But in addition, their players have what the Dutch call "specific qualities." Bastian Schweinsteiger is a great tackler, Mesut Ozil a dribbler, Mats Hummels can head, Thomas Muller is an unmatched athlete, and so on.

Older Dutch players do have "specific qualities": Robben's dribble, Sneijder's shot, Ron Vlaar's muscles, Van Persie's nose for goal. But Holland's under-30s lack them. In this generation nobody put in the hours repetitively practising tackles or shots or long passes. Every Dutch player was raised as a short passer, because short passing was conceived of as the whole of soccer.

There used to be more to the Dutch game. For about 30 unbroken years until 2004, Holland's sweeper had arguably the best long pass in international soccer: first Ruud Krol, then Ronald Koeman and finally Frank de Boer. But they had no successor, and now Holland has no alternative to knitting its way out from the back. The Dutch buildup has become unsurprising.


The Netherlands head coach was defiant despite seeing his side fail to qualify for the European championships for the first time since 1984.
Moreover, the Dutch have come to undervalue the art of man-marking. When Stefan de Vrij (now with Lazio Roma) was at Feyenoord, he realized that like all young Dutch defenders he had less muscle than his foreign counterparts. Shrewdly, he went to the gym to build himself up. When Feyenoord found out, it told him to stop. Huub Stevens, a Dutch coach recently released by Stuttgart (almost no Dutchmen still coach big foreign clubs), recently told the Dutch NRC Handelsblad newspaper: "Of course I am a believer in ball possession, but for that you have to have the ball. Holland lacks ball-winners."

Up front, it lacks individualists. Dutch strikers are raised first and foremost to pass, not dribble or shoot. Robben only became a dribbler because he grew up in an isolated northern village near the German border far from the main Dutch academies. There was nobody around to coach the dribble out of him. His potential successors in the younger generation, Memphis Depay and Ricardo Kishna, repeatedly clashed with Holland's leading clubs. PSV Eindhoven struggled for years to keep Memphis on board, and this summer Ajax sent Kishna to Lazio with a "good riddance." Any Dutch individualist is a system error. No wonder, remarks Dutch coach Fred Rutten, that today's players do best under a manager like Van Gaal who tells them exactly what to do, rather than a freewheeling coach like Guus Hiddink.

For now, the system that best suits Dutch players is a rapid counterattack from a packed defense. That's what Holland used in its last three good tournaments, Euro 2008 and the last two World Cups. Hiddink and his successor, Danny Blind (Daley's dad), went wrong in the Euro qualifiers by trying to reinstate the traditional Dutch 4-3-3 game with the new tradition of "sterile possession."

But in the long term, Holland needs to reinvent its soccer. It may have to swallow the ultimate humiliation: handing over its national team to a coach from today's most intelligent soccer country, archrival Germany.

Simon Kuper is a contributor to ESPN FC and co-author, with Stefan Szymanski, of Soccernomics.

http://www.espnfc.com/team/netherlands/449/blog/post/2663233/netherlands-fail-euro-qualifying-and-must-start-from-scratch



Edited by Barca4life: 15/10/2015 10:31:38 AM

Edited by Barca4life: 15/10/2015 10:32:29 AM
By Arthur - 26 Dec 2015 8:25 AM

Justafan wrote:
Barca4Life wrote:
Justafan wrote:
This is what I am seeing with the SAP at grass root club level is either teams focusing too heavily on 1 or 2 skills such as RWTB or 1v1 or passing or just trying to win.

Why not just focus on all 4 key skills at the SAP age? rotating the skills over the year. The thing that I feel gets lost in the FFA NC is the individual creativity part. My belief is let them play and encourage them to do different things on a field i.e. if someone is dominating the game dribbling ask them in the second half can they put a through ball to the forwards? to mix their game up.

To me being able to make the killer ball is being individually creative as dribbling through everyone.

I would also like to see some additional focus on shooting drills especially at 10 to 12 age group.

Just my thoughts or else we will create similar 1 dimensional players as the Dutch appear to be doing.


Well in SAP from what i've seen all core skills are taught every 6 week basis, and often get rotated.

But you're right i would like to see the coaches just let the players to encourage to use all core skills rather than focus one or two things depending on the situation during training on during the weekend.

To let players create their own style and build confidence and creativity this needs to happen, or else we will create robots which harm in long term.

It seems like the results of this are happening for the dutch from what i've seen from them.


From my experience I would agree and say that the SAP at grass root level is slowly improving and some clubs are really making a effort (heard some good things from coaches at other clubs) but I would say at Miniroo level the majority is still not doing this. I have played teams at the beginning of the year and then at the end of the year and I have seen very little improvement in those teams, if any.

Just the other week doing a coaching course I was talking to one coach who's focus was just on passing and then the coach to the left of me was talking about just doing RWTB as they can learn passing later.

One thing I have noticed with new coaches is their willingness to talk about doing a coaching course, this was something I did not hear often when I first started. The clubs are also starting to push this more. Of course what you do after the course is up to the individual coach.

But at least most know what the 4 key skills are now, a couple year of ago most could not even tell you this.

Interesting comments regarding coaches philosophies at coaching course.
Fundamental problem at clubs in Australia is coaches at clubs running their own football philosophies.
A footballer in Australia starting at 6 years of age by the time he's 18 could have had 12 coaches with 12 different philosophies and conflicting messages.
To develop elite footballers you need clubs providing football philosophies on a long term development process implemented by coaches not coaches providing players with one year snapshots of their football philosophies.
Player development needs to be seen much like the education system, primary school and high school with educational building blocks that are age appropriate and consistent.