By switters - 14 Nov 2015 3:31 PM
4 NOV 2015 - 12:08PM
The grassroots club aiming to revolutionise Australian football
(Supplied)
Dubnar United
Dubnar United
Dubnar United
Hide Grid
IMAGE 1/ VIDEO AUDIO
The talent pool for the next Harry Kewell, Tim Cahill or Tom Rogic may be about to grow – thanks to a trailblazing grassroots club which has booted out the business model that forces parents to pay thousands of dollars to fund their kids' dreams.
By David Lewis
14 NOV 2015 - 11:58 AM UPDATED 3 HOURS AGO
0
Sydney-based fledging NPL side Dunbar Rovers have eradicated all fees for youngsters who sign for their junior teams leading a revolution that, if other clubs were to follow, would open elite pathways slammed shut for years to those unable to afford costs sometimes well in excess of $3000 per season.
Clubs across Australia’s lower tiers siphon millions of dollars from junior programs to pay first team players up to $800 for per match.
But pioneering Dunbar don’t pay their players a cent. Nor do they charge parents of their junior teams a cent either.
Instead, the football visionaries who run the eastern suburbs-based club dream of seeing a future Socceroo rise through their ranks thanks to a policy of inclusion rather than exclusion.
In the wake of SBS analyst and former Socceroo Craig Foster highlighting Dunbar’s drive to challenge the prevailing pay-for-play wisdom in a recent Fairfax column, Dunbar's Facebook page has been inundated and kids are queing to sign up. It's beginning to look more Roy of the Rovers than Dunbar Rovers.
Peter Hennessy, one of five directors of the NPL Division Three side, has a utopian vision that one day it will be the model all follow and the age of Australia being most expensive country in the world for kids to play at the elite levels will be over.
“It would be nice to think we could change things from the bottom up," he says. “The system at the moment is broken. There is no doubt the cost of elite youth football is astronomically expensive and is getting worse.
“It might be fine if the registration fees (now capped at $2400 in NSW) actually went towards the infrstructure for the kids, but it's actually siphoned off to paying wages for first grade players. And that makes the situation even worse.
“There's absolutely no doubt talented kids are being lost to the game because of the costs involved.
"Imagine if we can get a player who would otherwise have gone to another code who goes on to play for the Socceroos .... that would be a real feather in our cap."
Instead of paying their players, Dunbar offer career guidance and provide networks to tap into through their contacts amid acknowledging that plenty of players will take their services elsewhere in search of a payday.
Hennessy welcomes what he describes as an "aura" which is developing around the club. it's reaching the point where sponsors are lining up to be associated with them.
“I think we’re also attracting players who ordinarily would play at a higher standard but because they want to be associated with our club and our ideals are prepared to play at a slightly lower level," he said.
“My utopia is that we create a unique football community. It would be great to see what we’re doing happening all over the country.
“But you need the people on board with the passion and skills to do it right. We will need to $200,000 this year and we already have $120,000 locked in.”
And that’s without parents paying a penny
\
http://theworldgame.sbs.com.au/article/2015/11/13/grassroots-club-aiming-revolutionise-australian-football
|
By nplyouth - 30 Sep 2016 8:53 PM
+x+xapparently the club has a policy of wanting to push players up into NPL Youth 1 clubs if they feel they are good enough. Mid season an U16 player left for Macarthur Rams in NPLY1. they don't seem to want to build a fifedom - but want to develop players and then pass them on to bigger clubs to develop further. that is very refreshing. I don't buy into that as I doubt they would develop better at macarthur rams. The top NPL 2 clubs are better than the bottom half of NPL1. Moving clubs at youth level is an ego problem with the player. Some of those NPL1 clubs don't care about developing players and just care about the $. If Dunbar are not charging their youth, then they care about the player development and should want to retain them right through to first grade and reap the benefits there.
interesting point you make - there is no doubt players like the idea of playing in NPLY1 - I guess over time if Dunbar are doing a really good job and players leave them for bigger clubs they may end up realising that the grass isn't always greener.
|
|