MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:whats ridicolus is that this agrumment . if the ffv did fine em its for a reason yes i know the ffv are fuckwits but they had to cos of the shit stalbans has done
Where you at the match? no. You didn't even know about the incident until weeks later, yet you feel you have enough knowledge to pass judgement. That’s a joke. Explain to me how the initial finding saw both clubs found equally guilty, and only in the appeal did we see this reversed, saying St Albans were the guilty club. Frankston are the home-side, responsibility for security and crowd safety lays with them. And let’s not forget the incident was between two sets of supporter, it takes two to fight. To lose 9 points, that has cost the club promotion is a ridiculous judgement from the FFV. the incident barely had a dozen people involved for ffs, and took place after the match with, most supporters having already left. There have been much worse incidents in this state yet never has such a punishment been handed down. Explain to me how that makes sense. There is zero consistency in the FFV's judgements, that is the main problem. they make it up as they go along, and all clubs in this state have had enough of the way they run the game. Well thats all clubs except the wonderful green gully, the only club in Victoria that supports the FFV