Tommycash
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
Could work, though do many people not attend state league matches due to prices? What prices are we looking at? I have no team in my local area so I don't really have that draw.
|
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
The system as it stands provides options for anyone who wants to play - and the best do find their way to the top very quickly.
The issue of increased attendance, as I said before, has been a focus because your initial post on the issue (in the other thread) was about crowd numbers. It's easy to see where confusion might creep in.
I have to stand by the notion that second tier support will always be low because it appears to be the case in the majority of leagues and the majority of codes around the country - and indeed, in the majority of the world. Once you get away from the elite, crowds drop, once you divorce from the elite, they virtually disappear.
|
|
|
kapow!
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Exactly what i said. Lesser teams was based on getting the best model to improve the development edge of the league to get the a-league interested and i think interest will benefit from having a senior mens comp covering the majority of the state.
It wasn't suggested that merging would automatically get people coming out overnight like you said. Your opinion is that no one will support second tier and that's why we'll never agree.
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
Then what's the issue?
|
|
|
kapow!
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Well it was never suggested there would be a sudden increase based on that.
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
I've focussed on crowd numbers because that was the original point you raised as an indicator of interest.
Participation levels are already high.
|
|
|
kapow!
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Lesser teams was based on getting the best model to improve the development edge of the league to get the a-league interested and having a senior mens comp covering the majority of the state. Aussie rules a more popular sport was the example used which adopted this method and it appears to have been successful i.e. it had nothing to do with gaining an immediate increase in crowds like you've attempted to suggest.
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
We go round and round, but I ask again... If we have 10 sides, each representing and drawing from a geographical section of the city/state, why would you expect any more supporters to turn up to watch?
|
|
|
kapow!
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:No. You suggest a way to restructure the leagues - you haven't suggested anything that will make it more popular. No that would be called selectively taking one point out of the OP in an attempt to discredit an entire topic. Even arthur happened to agree there were too many teams with different aims in the same competition, his preference was just to divide them and leave them there which doesn’t solve the problem imo.
You can look at any second tier competition, in any sport, anywhere around the country, and you will see the same result. Nobody wants to watch second tier. You don't have to be einstein to realise that 2nd tier gets lesser support. That doesn’t meant that there can be factors to increase or decrease levels of secondary support, at the moment the second tier appears to be particular disconnected and the result is unnecessary bitterness.
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
No. You suggest a way to restructure the leagues - you haven't suggested anything that will make it more popular. You can look at any second tier competition, in any sport, anywhere around the country, and you will see the same result. Nobody wants to watch second tier.
|
|
|
kapow!
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:kapow! wrote:lol i'm unsure why you think playing dumb is smart, most people would consider it as insincere. I'm not playing dumb. I'm asking a question. You're extremely good at saying what you think needs to be done, but very rarely seem to offer any suggestions of how to actually do it. The question remains - how do we create a greater sense of identity between supporters and teams in order to generate larger crowds at a local level? You were being an ass because it's already been discussed in a topic i created and you're still posting in it. I suggested the state leagues needed a greater purpose to generate a-league interest [a development edge] and a direct link with juniors, the mechanisms to achieve that i copied from other sports. Your contribution to that topic was to suggest that no links were needed as apparently everything was fine because the league was 'self supporting' and no one supports second tier sport, incorrectly citing non-ethnic unconnected clubs as examples. For the mechanisms that were suggested you gave reasons such as 'football is different' as to why they wouldn't work for us. Your sincerity on that topic was summed up when you gave arthur's 'plan', a word for word plagiarised version of the NSL report, a big tick of approval acting as if it was his own work. You're incapable of having an unbiased evidence based discussion on this topic.
|
|
|
SydneyCroatia
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Exactly... FNSW raised prices from $12 to $15 this year and it certainly didnt impact our crowds. The same fans will always be there whether it's free, $10 or $30.
What the clubs should be doing is encouraging their juniors to come to games. Give one of the parents a free season pass or something. That may result in a small increase of revenue as people who usually wouldnt go might decide to take their kid every now and then.
|
|
|
RedshirtWilly
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.4K,
Visits: 0
|
If the fee was abolished, the clubs would have to find another way to find the 12 buck entry fee. I already buy a coffee and a pie there, i dont know how else I will spend the entry fee to reimburse the club for the free entry.. if you like the state league you will go to it regardless of the price to be honest
|
|
|
SydneyCroatia
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
People who want to go to State League games will go whether it's free or not.
Devaluing the product by giving it away for free will not bring extra people through the gates, IMO. At least not to the extent where they will make up for the lost revenue from ticket sales
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
kapow! wrote:lol i'm unsure why you think playing dumb is smart, most people would consider it as insincere. I'm not playing dumb. I'm asking a question. You're extremely good at saying what you think needs to be done, but very rarely seem to offer any suggestions of how to actually do it. The question remains - how do we create a greater sense of identity between supporters and teams in order to generate larger crowds at a local level?
|
|
|
kapow!
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
lol i'm unsure why you think playing dumb is smart, most people would consider it as insincere.
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
How do we create connections?
|
|
|
kapow!
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:kapow! wrote:I don’t think there should be a price admission on the off chance that someone might be exposed to it by chance, like it and support it, however price is not barrier to attendance. The problem in Victoria at least, is there isn’t the local connection and it's not giving the a-league fans a reason to look, which means the league doesn’t have a purpose and there is no interest. The problem with ALL state leagues is that the general public in Australia is not interested in watching second tier football. For example, Queensland State League also has very low attendance figures despite being a league consisting entirely of sides representing specific geographic locations. We've discussed this before. Usually you confuse geographical meaning non-ethnic, when i’m saying connected v non-connected. It makes sense to have a league connected and give it a purpose, then decide how much support there is for a secondary tier, rather than just declaring from the start that there is no support. As for Qld, i'm unsure whether you know anymore than me, they appear to be producing more players than us, but from what i can gather from on here, their competition was created on top of their existing leagues and is equally as unconnected as ours, as well as spread out over a much larger state.
|
|
|
RedEyeRob
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.3K,
Visits: 0
|
ClaytonZane wrote:RedEyeRob wrote:I'm of the opinion that in most cases you should never give away your product for free. You should go into business. You'd make a killing.:lol: :lol: I come from the Gene Simmons school of thought: "My point of view is "Earth," that's not such a cool name for the planet. "Planet Kiss," now you've got something. If every inch of ground is KISS ground, and the air you breath is KISS air and the food you eat is KISS food, then we've got something. Brand everything. And you should pay us for every step along the way.....I don't believe in anything for free... Last time I checked, KISS is not a charity. I will let you know when I want to give my stuff away for free. I don't want you to determine that."Geno's always good for a laugh.
|
|
|
ClaytonZane
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 92,
Visits: 0
|
RedEyeRob wrote:I'm of the opinion that in most cases you should never give away your product for free. You should go into business. You'd make a killing.:lol:
|
|
|
RedEyeRob
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.3K,
Visits: 0
|
I'm of the opinion that in most cases you should never give away your product for free.
If state league clubs allowed free entry, i don't think it will make a single bit of difference to increasing attendances. It will only hurt an important revenue stream and devalue the product. People who WANT to go, WILL go.
Also there are some venues that just make bad food. I've pretty much got a list of clubs where i will and won't eat, so the idea that it will encourage people to spend more on food i think won't work.
IMO there is a case that suggests the games are too expensive. Most Super League (ie Premier League equivalent) clubs charge $9 entry. I think $5 is about right, but there are teams who have good viewing facilities and should charge more (for maintenance purposes). Whilst there are others who have no elevated viewing and should be charging nothing (or less).
|
|
|
SMFC and proud
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Reasonable idea but local clubs need every dollar they can possibly muster. 500 paying customers means around $5k revenue which goes a long long way for most clubs. Most grass roots fans that attend SL games understand how hard it is to run a club and don't mind paying to watch, buying food and drinks from the canteen etc. Really for around $25 you get a decent day out, a good feed and a good laugh usually.
Maybe have a one off community round where entry is free and clubs/FFV can organise stuff like farmers market stalls, kids entertainment, appearances from HAL players etc.
|
|
|
FortressBelmore
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 174,
Visits: 0
|
NSWPL varies at different grounds some charge $10 others charge $15 for adults $5 or $10 for concession depending on the different venues. U-16s are free
|
|
|
RAM
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 431,
Visits: 0
|
Minimalistix wrote:i know that, u didnt tell me what u did u imbred bush rat. Upset DDK.
|
|
|
Minimalistix
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.4K,
Visits: 0
|
i know that, u didnt tell me what u did u imbred bush rat.
|
|
|
RAM
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 431,
Visits: 0
|
Minimalistix wrote:what u do? I'm a heartless troll that should spend more time working.
|
|
|
Blackmissionary
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 325,
Visits: 0
|
Minimalistix wrote:Benjamin wrote:f1dave wrote:keepersball wrote:Clubs in NSW run themselves as purely businesses, and as a business, you look at anyway to exploit your inputs, and if you can get a positive return from your ouput, then they'll continue.
Tickets=Money, Club want money. Yeah, for sure. But it's often discussed on WA football forums anyway the idea that no gate price = slightly higher gates = even higher bar takings. It's just something that had been discussed over here anyway. I just thought I'd see if similar thoughts had happened over east. Edited by f1dave: 25/10/2011 01:22:15 AM South Melbourne had a free game season before last as a farewell to Bob Jane Stadium. There were elements of the day one would prefer to forgot (read: morons on the pitch), but the attendance was around 3000-3500. However, it was - by VPL standards - a pretty well promoted game. I'm not sure how often clubs could afford to make it free. Also, I don't know how it works in NSW, but here in Victoria all U12 get in free. I often take my son just to get him away from the Wii. Edited by Benjamin: 25/10/2011 12:25:59 PM u16 for free in NSW. What's the price break down is NSWPL? In Victoria, VPL is $12 adult, $8 concession.
|
|
|
Minimalistix
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.4K,
Visits: 0
|
what u do?
|
|
|
RAM
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 431,
Visits: 0
|
Minimalistix wrote:RAM wrote:Minimalistix wrote:Ram :-({|= :-({|= :-({|= :-({|= Not really a musician Spiro. I did like your song about walking on water though.:lol: come back to FA you bush spic. I'm banned mate. Pour out some Ouzo for me.
|
|
|
Minimalistix
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:f1dave wrote:keepersball wrote:Clubs in NSW run themselves as purely businesses, and as a business, you look at anyway to exploit your inputs, and if you can get a positive return from your ouput, then they'll continue.
Tickets=Money, Club want money. Yeah, for sure. But it's often discussed on WA football forums anyway the idea that no gate price = slightly higher gates = even higher bar takings. It's just something that had been discussed over here anyway. I just thought I'd see if similar thoughts had happened over east. Edited by f1dave: 25/10/2011 01:22:15 AM South Melbourne had a free game season before last as a farewell to Bob Jane Stadium. There were elements of the day one would prefer to forgot (read: morons on the pitch), but the attendance was around 3000-3500. However, it was - by VPL standards - a pretty well promoted game. I'm not sure how often clubs could afford to make it free. Also, I don't know how it works in NSW, but here in Victoria all U12 get in free. I often take my son just to get him away from the Wii. Edited by Benjamin: 25/10/2011 12:25:59 PM u16 for free in NSW.
|
|
|