Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
Steelinho wrote:
However, this can be countered with better coaching throughout the country. The better and more widespread the coaching, the less we need these "talented player pathways," the more we'll see these players become elite through natural development and the less chance we'll have of missing those players for the new generation of A-League/Socceroos.
At least, that's the dream.
Sage comment, Steelinho. This is how I perceive things too. The state FFA Game Development Officer, who is also the state head SAP coach, also believes in this mantra. The better skilled Aussie club coaches are, the better for players. Ultimately, the SAP/Skillaroos Program was conceived by Berger, because he didn't trust a lot of coaches to deliver what he wanted them to. I'd like to think that our Community Football Program is augmenting the SAP/Skillaroos, except that we are providing opportunities to players regardless of ability. We also teach some explicit technique too, unlike the SAP.
|
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Steelinho wrote:Arthur wrote:At the same time why are we still trying to identify players at 12 and 11 years of age when all the evidence says you cannot? Just as Han Berger describes in part two with Relative Age Effect.
Relative Age Effect is mentioned multiple times throughout the National Curriculum, too, and I don't understand how it can possible note that there is a problem with doing it in relation to RAE, yet still insist that it continues to be done that way. However, this can be countered with better coaching throughout the country. The better and more widespread the coaching, the less we need these "talented player pathways," the more we'll see these players become elite through natural development and the less chance we'll have of missing those players for the new generation of A-League/Socceroos. At least, that's the dream. Very wise commnent. Hopefully moving forward with more and better coaches there will be less reliance on the "talented pathways".
|
|
|
Steelinho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 61,
Visits: 0
|
Arthur wrote:At the same time why are we still trying to identify players at 12 and 11 years of age when all the evidence says you cannot? Just as Han Berger describes in part two with Relative Age Effect.
Relative Age Effect is mentioned multiple times throughout the National Curriculum, too, and I don't understand how it can possible note that there is a problem with doing it in relation to RAE, yet still insist that it continues to be done that way. However, this can be countered with better coaching throughout the country. The better and more widespread the coaching, the less we need these "talented player pathways," the more we'll see these players become elite through natural development and the less chance we'll have of missing those players for the new generation of A-League/Socceroos. At least, that's the dream.
|
|
|
Judy Free
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
krones3 wrote:Arthur wrote:
At the same time why are we still trying to identify players at 12 and 11 years of age when all the evidence says you cannot? Just as Han Berger describes in part two with Relative Age Effect.
=d> =d> =d> =d> =d> Who is apparently doing this identification, at which level, and who is missing out? But do agree about your references to age i.e. 12 is bordering on being a bit late.
|
|
|
krones3
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Arthur wrote:
At the same time why are we still trying to identify players at 12 and 11 years of age when all the evidence says you cannot? Just as Han Berger describes in part two with Relative Age Effect.
=d> =d> =d> =d> =d>
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Just finished watching all four all I can say is I understand the rational of what they've done, the FFA and State Federations.
But all I can say is that you cannot just turn a switch on and expect to get high quality or better quality than what you had.
At the same time why are we still trying to identify players at 12 and 11 years of age when all the evidence says you cannot? Just as Han Berger describes in part two with Relative Age Effect.
|
|
|
krones3
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Arthur wrote:Done with all 4 parts I watched all 4 even saw lonton in the audience. Here is the problem what i saw localy last season was an absolute disgrace and anti player development. The same people will be there next season so what will change.NOTHING Although these people know what they have done,failed to do and what is expected of them,Nothing will change because there is no accountability.The coaches who should be there will not be there because they did not bow to the demands of wealthy,powerful,influential parents. and I bet this is happening across the country. [-x [-x [-x [-x [-x
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
krones3
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
great find needs a thread of its own.
|
|
|
dirk vanadidas
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Why are officals of state federations and FFA not on fixed term contracts, if they are shit then dont renew, works elsewhere in the world why not the peoples republic of aus. Heard the term 442 going to be used as youth development and not 433 by an apl club as the players can get 433 .
Europe is funding the war not Chelsea football club
|
|
|
krones3
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
So Mr Berger you want change. You expect to get it using the same people who opposed you the most ie Paul Lonton. Please](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,)
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Han Berger speaking about the National curriculum, FFA National Competition Review and Elite Player Pathway Review. Goes for about an hour and is quiet interesting. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShGS7i15-fQ
|
|
|
one_toouch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 434,
Visits: 0
|
krones3 wrote:Judy Free wrote:Coerver, money making machine that passed it's use-by date over 10 years ago.
No surprises that it's now just finding it's way to the hotbed of strayan sockah dev, tasmania.
There's an idiot born every minute.....possibly every 30 seconds in tassie.
you have no credibility Judy remember how you went on about short slow and game skills 4 years on try tall, super fast,silky skills and great game sense. =; Why do you waste your time responding to this sad, wannabe, neverwas, troll? He never answers a simple question, he just simply responds with a sad cliched bitter response. This was the old man that was shown the door by more clubs than he's had posts on FFT.
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Judy Free wrote:Coerver, money making machine that passed it's use-by date over 10 years ago.
No surprises that it's now just finding it's way to the hotbed of strayan sockah dev, tasmania.
There's an idiot born every minute.....possibly every 30 seconds in tassie.
Now you've got me interested, what in your opinion is important excerises/drills/programs to train young soccer athletes? Especially whats up to date or current.
|
|
|
krones3
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Judy Free wrote:Coerver, money making machine that passed it's use-by date over 10 years ago.
No surprises that it's now just finding it's way to the hotbed of strayan sockah dev, tasmania.
There's an idiot born every minute.....possibly every 30 seconds in tassie.
you have no credibility Judy remember how you went on about short slow and game skills 4 years on try tall, super fast,silky skills and great game sense. =;
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
Judy Free wrote:Coerver, money making machine that passed it's use-by date over 10 years ago.
No surprises that it's now just finding it's way to the hotbed of strayan sockah dev, tasmania.
There's an idiot born every minute.....possibly every 30 seconds in tassie.
When I return from my remote location, with access to limited technology, towards the end of the month, I'll post a number of Coerver training ground videos for you to deconstruct, Chips. You can explain why they are obsolete or unsuitable for the training ground. You can explain how you would improve them. You can also explain what you would do instead. You can redeem yourself from the ignominy of your refresher FFA Youth Licence failure, which is a very basic community course. A bit of hubris on your part didn't help your cause. Eventually, this led to Blacktown's Ken Schembri deeming you unworthy of carrying his cones. Yet you still carry on exuding considerable hubris as a former self-proclaimed great coach, trolling, and denigrating most attempts by other coaches to improve training ground practices. Edited by Decentric: 7/8/2012 11:07:15 PM
|
|
|
Judy Free
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Coerver, money making machine that passed it's use-by date over 10 years ago.
No surprises that it's now just finding it's way to the hotbed of strayan sockah dev, tasmania.
There's an idiot born every minute.....possibly every 30 seconds in tassie.
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
Aussiesrus wrote:
Coever sucked millions from the FNSW coffers and put thousands of kids through it's system and you can only come up with 3 players?. It's quite simply crap. I knew some very high up coever coaches who said it was rubbish but didn't care because it paid their wages.
Edited by Aussiesrus: 6/8/2012 01:59:42 PM
Who were the Coerver coaches? What are their current roles in football? Coerver is very big in Japan, according to Coerver Coaching. Of course one needs to be selective. I've seen one Coerver drill that was poor. It involved too many players watching two players complete a 1v1drill. There were too many inactive players. This phenomenon is not exclusive to Coerver though. I've also seen Norm Boardman be guilty of this,the same as a W League coach and a NTC coach. Generally Coerver exercises are useful. When you last set out your training ground practice, you had a few in yours!:) Edited by Decentric: 7/8/2012 12:06:13 AMEdited by Decentric: 7/8/2012 12:08:37 AM
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
Aussiesrus wrote:So from all the australians that have been through the coerver training system you can only come up with 3 aussies who in your opinion are of note?
Edited by Aussiesrus: 6/8/2012 01:59:42 PM These were the ones the Australasian head of Coerver lauded as Coerver graduates, not me.
|
|
|
Aussiesrus
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 926,
Visits: 0
|
So from all the australians that have been through the coerver training system you can only come up with 3 aussies who in your opinion are of note?
Rogic was made by the "nike second chance". If coerver was any good he would not have to go through the nike second chance lottery. A club would have picked him well before.
In a nutshell your just providing evidence that coerver was rubbish and any other spin off of coever is also rubbish.
Coever sucked millions from the FNSW coffers and put thousands of kids through it's system and you can only come up with 3 players?. It's quite simply crap. I knew some very high up coever coaches who said it was rubbish but didn't care because it paid their wages.
Terry Antonis is the u/20 socceroo captain and had his teams arse handed to them on a platter by japan 5-0 recently and has proved nothing so far other than he can take up space, steven who? never heard of him, Ljubo is a complete fruitcake...
Arjen Robben and Co would have been stars even if they went to cake baking school. In fact they would probably be better players if they avoided coerver and went to margaret fultons cooking classes instead.
Edited by Aussiesrus: 6/8/2012 01:59:42 PM
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
Aussiesrus wrote: Coever was also a past system adopted by FNSW that was completely shonky. They even tried to claim Harry Kewell as product and harry flately denied he'd ever been coever trained. So even the system FNSW adopted was shonky and corrupt. Edited by Aussiesrus: 3/8/2012 12:37:22 AM[/i
I can throw some light on this subject straight from Australasian Coerver's head of operations. Our club was going to bring to Coerver to Tasmania, and still intend to do it. The Aussie Coerver head is a mate of Han Berger's. Coerver still claim Kewell is Coerver trained. At the time, Kewell's agent, was it Bernie Mandic?, wanted more money from Coerver for Kewell to endorse the Coerver Coaching model. They couldn't agree to terms. I remember the interview where Kewell repudiated Coerver. According to Coerver, they claim Arjen Robben, Gareth Bale, Zenden, Peter Crouch, Terry Antonis, Tom Rogic and Ljubo's teammate, Steven Lustica, are all Coerver trained. FFA's Tassie SAP and Skillaroos trainer has verified Rogic as Coerver trained. There is probably a consensus amongst FFA coaches that Coerver trained players are often our best technicians, but they also contend their decision making is not at the same level. So Aussiesrus, FFA have used world Coerver head , Alf Galustian, to assist in drafting the FFA SAP and Skillaroos programs. I'm probably going to be in some pretty remote areas for a some time, so I'll check this thread out some time again in the future. [i]Edited by Decentric: 6/8/2012 08:58:14 AM
|
|
|
Aussiesrus
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 926,
Visits: 0
|
Barca,
He doesn't like overpriced academies that promise the world and deliver very little. Neither do I.
There are quite a few academies around that give academies a bad name. It's like anything nowdays. You have to sort the quality that can deliver from the sharks that only take your bucks.
So I respect that Fozzie has come across them. I did a lot of homework before I sent my lad to an academy and choosing a NSWPL club for his development. It's the fact that some people put ALL academies in the same boat which is not the case and is annoying. There are good ones around and crap ones.
Our system also creates this problem fozzie is talking about because the system is very limited and political and still ethnic based which fuels the desperation by parents to get their kids higher learning. It's similar to private and religous schools with high fees. Some parents will pay anything to give their kids this opportunity. Fozzie can't really blame the parents for doing whatever they can to give their kids the best opportunity. From a clubs perspective clubs cannot survive without the cash to pay players and coaches vital to keep their clubs in elite football. This is because FFA sets the guidelines, sets the system, sets the models and dictates to our state bodies.
Fozzie should be pointing the finger at the system that has created all this in the first place. Clubs are battling for their own survival and parents are battling for their kids future. It's the system letting them all down.
Kwabena Appiah and Mitchell Duke to name just 2 are products of a private academy and the central coast mariners. Both are signed to A-League first teams. Kwabena was one of the first three signed by wanderers. I know for a fact if it wasn't for a private academy and central coast mariners coach (Arnie) Kwabena would still be running around NSW super league going unnoticed and wasting his talents.
I also note that wanderers are trialling players that are not even considered good enough to be playing in a NSWPL first grade side and have no contract because wanderers also appear to be hand tied to some degree by the system.
Coever was also a past system adopted by FNSW that was completely shonky. They even tried to claim Harry Kewell as product and harry flately denied he'd ever been coever trained. So even the system FNSW adopted was shonky and corrupt.
The system is the big failure here and until it changes will continue produce failed results. But I doubt this because FFA have their butts firmly planted up their arse and life is just one big party in at FFA HQ at our expense. FFA is no less corrupt than FIFA's blatter destroying his political opponents. FFA did the same with the FNSW president as he was a threat and would not tow the FFA line.
If a Japanese scout complains he can't even get his players a trial at some NSWPL clubs then there still exists racists clubs in our second tier which feeds the a-league and he openly explained this too me. I told him i've seen this for over 30 years and nothing new to me but hearing it from a person from Japan was the big surprise. Fortunately he found a top club that has signed them and they are kicking arse in the NSWPL.
Edited by Aussiesrus: 3/8/2012 12:37:22 AM
|
|
|
Barca4Life
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Aussiesrus wrote:Decentric wrote:Aussiesrus wrote:
Decentric, You know what system i'm talking about. No other australian system, club can boast a player signed with manchester city. I can tell you if it wasn't for the system i'm talking about this kid would not even get into a rep side. Yet those that have been through the current system can't get off the bench at most clubs they are signed too. Other systems provided by successful academies are just a slap in the face for berger which is why he wants them out. Because it makes his system look 3rd rate which in my opinion it is.
This is a fair point, but I think it amounts to subjective selection by coaches - not a failing of methodology. ASA has results with players not wanted in the system, but a different coach within the FFA system may have selected the two lads who have gained contracts with EPL clubs through ASA. I imagine in NSW there are so many players with similar abilities, good players can regularly miss out. Apparently Kewell, Tobin and Cahill missed out on some rep teams in the past. I don't agree with Berger that we rid Australia of private academies. I know a state FFA TD who agrees with us privately, but can't say it publicly. He can't say it publicly because he is owned by the system. The same as players cannot be picked with better talent because of the system. If we are at the point where the system is failing then time to get rid of the system and those that have turned the system into a dictatorship. No system is bigger than Australia and it's success and people should be able to speak their minds about it. This isn't germany 1943 or a communist country. If we are all going to walk around and let the king have no clothes then we will be left exposed as well. Japan have made the leap forward in advanced techniques which suits their players. Yet we embrace an old outdated system that has produced sweet feck all. Hence the downward spiral. The system is like a rolling bulldozer that will squash anything in it's path. So while we let this happen get used to being flogged by asian countries and australia will slowly rank lower and lower and qualify for less and less. It's already happening. And I see nothing in the future of our youth of the current applied system to suggest otherwise. Shhh Craig Foster doesn't like elite academies. ;)
|
|
|
krones3
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
How can it be that all the posts on this topic are in part correct? and then there is this Quote:The recent National Competitions Review recommendations had better work. Instead of a cap on fees payable by youth players, there is to be a points system implemented to encourage home grown products. Time will tell what effect this has on the football economy because, to state the bleeding obvious, change is desperately needed.
Kids are being overcharged. Some academies are selling dreams for exorbitant fees - with some agents selling overseas trials to hopeful but misguided parents for upwards of five or six thousand dollars, which is an absolute disgrace. And the grab for dollars goes even deeper.
Recently, in Sydney, it came to my attention that some parents are paying large amounts of money to the club under the table for their child to play in elite teams.
In at least one instance that I'm aware of, someone has paid tens of thousands of dollars to a club to coach its elite youth team, despite not being qualified for the role.
These are two examples that reflect the flawed economy of junior football that is plaguing our game, as greedy clubs heap larger burdens on vulnerable parents.
It has to stop, because it is selling off the future to fund today.
If any club is so desperate to stay afloat that it is prepared to allow someone to pay his way into an elite youth team coaching position, rather than earn it the proper way, they are not only a disgrace to football for selling out the game, but are clearly in a financially parlous state.
It would be better for the game if that club closed its doors rather than prostitute the quality of environment and education being provided to our future generations of players. Anyone with knowledge of such a situation should immediately alert the association, state body and Football Federation Australia (FFA).
How can we call ourselves a game of high standards when a parent is being charged several thousand dollars his child's football development, only for the person in charge of that education to have gained the position by paying for it?
The opportunity to be able to shape the football development of a child or youth player is a gift that must be taken more seriously, for every mistake limits the chances of a boy or girl to make a career in the game. Selling such a position to the highest bidder goes against every principle of decency, integrity and value the game stands for.
Nor is 'opportunity' merely a term that can be used without understanding the ramifications for a child's life. In Outliers Malcolm Gladwell argues that being chosen in an elite program sets off a potentially virtuous cycle in a child's life and ultimately career.
The author calls this 'accumulative advantage', where the child enters a better learning environment with (hopefully) better coaches, facilities and a greater frequency of training.
This allows the chosen child to progress above those excluded, making them more likely to be selected the following years in better positions, creating a cycle that eventually raises the child's ability.
Unfortunately in our system, money is allowing mediocre performers to enter the system ahead of more talented children who can't afford to.
Every time we choose a development squad or first team at any age, we assume a responsibility that can make immense positive impact on a child's life. A child's future should never be for sale.
It is imperative that we train thousands more child educators for our grass roots clubs. To that end the cost of coaching courses must fall. That cost is ultimately passed on to the parents in one form or another and any parent entering the game is entitled to believe their child is being given the best possible chance to succeed.
The thought of someone without the skills, paying for the privilege of guiding talented kids, makes me sick to the core. Absolute filth, and a stain on the game. Both the payer, and payee.
By the same token, I am reliably informed that the practice of people paying for their children to be a part of these elite squads is alive and well.
Any club that sells a position in an elite youth squad should be shut down, the management prosecuted for destroying the integrity of the game and life bans handed around. How many truly gifted talents are missing out because clubs are selling positions in elite squads to stay alive?
It is difficult to quantify the damaging effect on the future of our game when these deplorable practices are going on.
For those clubs and administrators who argue that they need to prostitute the heart of the game to keep their club alive, do all of us a favor by closing the doors and throw away the key. The game neither wants nor needs you.
You have not the first concept of what football is about.
Let’s ensure that we start promoting the best talents, charging them the least possible, ceasing the practice of passing on the cost of Premier League teams to the children below and work together to develop a system that is of higher quality, fairer and cheaper, for all.
Our future depends on it. also right and explains harry kewells interview comments.
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
Arthur wrote:Just a reminder Cruyff, the father of Spainish Football cannot stand the KNVB and has just routed AJAX junior development practices as too regimented, to fitness based and not based on developing technique.
While his system of play is different to KNVB's.
I'm sure there would be a lot of KNVB influence in Cruyff's training ground methodology. This is because he was inculcated in it from being a wee lad. I think I read in David Winner's Brilliant Orange that Cruyff had a lot to do with Rinus Michaels in his formative years in football - Michaels being the founder of contemporary KNVB and Total Football. Cruyff criticises KNVB from the perspective of someone who has learnt the methodology from within. Many in Australia criticise it, with no knowledge of it, because they have heard others denigrate it often enough, but without deconstructing it. They have no knowledge of Clarefontaine, Coverciano or Barca Academy either. Yet one would assume they are familiar with all four methodological systems given the vociferous tone of some.:roll: I think we've all seen five Barca Academy training ground drills on the internet. All are specific technique instruction, not in a game context. Maybe this is analogous to reading theory in education? Those parents of children would possibly have some awareness of teaching reading by phonics as opposed to a whole language approach. Twenty years ago everything was supposed to be whole language. Some of us still did some phonic teaching. Then an edict was made that we all should teach phonics. I see this debate occurring in football. Some time in the future I can see FFA issuing an edict that specific isolated technique instruction must be taught. One issue I take with FFA instructors, is that the non-specific technique instruction may work with talented elite players. Conversely, I maintain most are not elite players and need some help. Also, any FFA instructor will tell you that Coerver trained players are usually our best technicians, but their decision making is not commensurate with their technique. World Coerver head, Alf Galustian, was an integral component in the drafting of the SAP curriculum. Coerver teaches explicit instruction, not always in a game context. Edited by Decentric: 3/8/2012 12:02:07 AM
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
Arthur wrote:Just a reminder Cruyff, the father of Spainish Football cannot stand the KNVB and has just routed AJAX junior development practices as too regimented, to fitness based and not based on developing technique.
While his system of play is different to KNVB's.
We get the impression that the Dutch system is a "Homogenous" system. It is not. Even though Holland made the last World Cup Final many Dutch men were disgusted at Van Marjwick's cynical tactics in the WC Final, chief amongst them Cruyff.
I remember reading your overview of that Dutch book you read, Arthur. It is a must read for me to observe how Cruyff has sent up the Barcelona Academy compared to the KNVB. If in a few years there was a change in the FFA's direction to what they do at the Barca Academy, whilst Spain and Barca still play well, with most of the players graduating from the Barca Academy, I would welcome the change. Where I differ from from what my FFA instructors are telling me, is explicit technique instruction. They want to put every isolated technique drill into a simulated game scenario. I maybe wrong, but if Johann Cruyff, the founder of Barca Academy, supports my point of difference, then great!:) Edited by Decentric: 2/8/2012 04:12:18 PM
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Just a reminder Cruyff, the father of Spainish Football cannot stand the KNVB and has just routed AJAX junior development practices as too regimented, to fitness based and not based on developing technique.
While his system of play is different to KNVB's.
We get the impression that the Dutch system is a "Homogenous" system. It is not. Even though Holland made the last World Cup Final many Dutch men were disgusted at Van Marjwick's cynical tactics in the WC Final, chief amongst them Cruyff.
The Australian NC should be taken as a learning base. I still have my level 2 Coaching licence book from 1985. It is night and day with today. We have so much information available to us with coaching methodology, teaching & learning styles for youth players, sports science methods etc to consider.
My observations have led me to beleive that while you may have coach's doing sessions with similar content what I have found is that it is how that content is delivered to the kids that makes all the difference. The kids can tell pretty quickly if a coach is having fun, is respectful, is honest, is sincere and they respond.
So personal qualities in my opinion do play a role in player development, its not just content its also how you deliver it.
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
Aussiesrus wrote: He can't say it publicly because he is owned by the system. The same as players cannot be picked with better talent because of the system.
This is the same with any senior bureaucrat operating within any system. At a school we had a major fight with the senior education bureaucracy in this state. They presented an antithetical view to our collective school view over use of a building. The minister's office seemed to take over from the bureaucrats who presented a cogent case for their cause. Months later a former state Premier told me the education bureaucracy was on our side!!!! They were at logger heads with the minister's office. We would never have known. We thought they were one united front, but the bureaucrats were owned by the minister's office.:-k
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
Aussiesrus wrote: I had an interesting discussion with a japanese scout in australia recently and told me he had trouble even getting trials here in australia for his japanese lads because their still exists the racist ethnics clubs which have a strangehold in our second tier football. He hinted this is becoming feedback to asia and is highly frowned upon by the asian football community and if not changed may cause australia future expulsion from the AFC..
Shocking.:roll: Believe it or not, there is almost adulation from Coerver and FFA stakeholders in Australia looking up to Japan.
|
|
|
Aussiesrus
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 926,
Visits: 0
|
The UK is his Manchester city, Man U, Leeds, Blackburn etc links. He checks out their systems, facilities etc. Uses what's good and leaves what isn't. Same as J-league and S-league in asia IE: Albirex Nitaga etc. There are also new avenues into the arab states etc. So the scope is becoming quite broad.
I had an interesting discussion with a japanese scout in australia recently and told me he had trouble even getting trials here in australia for his japanese lads because their still exists the racist ethnics clubs which have a strangehold in our second tier football. He hinted this is becoming feedback to asia and is highly frowned upon by the asian football community and if not changed may cause australia future expulsion from the AFC.
All heresay of course...
|
|
|