NicCarBel
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3K,
Visits: 0
|
I know we all generally focus on something for Brisbane Roar to play out of properly like Ballymore, but news in today that AFL will have to continue using the bed they made 20 years ago with the last renovations to the Gabba Brisbane Olympic Games 2032: QLD government won’t rebuild Gabba, no new stadium, QSAC $1.6 billion redevelopment plan, latest news (foxsports.com.au)Glad this is happening, any time AFL (by extension) gets something out of nothing is a great day. EDIT: My line should have said any time AFL gets nothing out of something is a great day. Whoops
|
|
|
|
numklpkgulftumch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Qld State Government has just kicked the can down the Road There will have to be a new Stadium built for Cricket and AFL, but without Federal money when it happens
|
|
|
roosty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 758,
Visits: 0
|
Truly crazy decision by the QLD government. So the Gabba isn’t big or new enough to host the athletics or opening ceremony, so they solve the problem by moving it an older stadium with a lower capacity of 40k, then diverting the opening ceremony to Suncorp.
Absolute pure clusterfuckery of the highest magnitude. Then again, it is Labor , so no surprise.
|
|
|
NicCarBel
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xTruly crazy decision by the QLD government. So the Gabba isn’t big or new enough to host the athletics or opening ceremony, so they solve the problem by moving it an older stadium with a lower capacity of 40k, then diverting the opening ceremony to Suncorp. Absolute pure clusterfuckery of the highest magnitude. Then again, it is Labor , so no surprise. I dunno, smart of them to spruce up a stadium that already has an athletics track, than to build something completely new. This way they can touch up the Gabba as they need to over the years. Remember, that was also expanded on just after Lang Park (unless we got fed backwards news in NSW 20 years ago). To me, personally, it doesn't make sense to build a new stadium that, after the Olympics, the major sports that will use it have no relation to the Olympic Games whatsoever. Remember Rio did similar, despite all the other white elephants they built.
|
|
|
numklpkgulftumch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xTruly crazy decision by the QLD government. So the Gabba isn’t big or new enough to host the athletics or opening ceremony, so they solve the problem by moving it an older stadium with a lower capacity of 40k, then diverting the opening ceremony to Suncorp. Absolute pure clusterfuckery of the highest magnitude. Then again, it is Labor , so no surprise. I dunno, smart of them to spruce up a stadium that already has an athletics track, than to build something completely new. Spruce up ? "upgrade QSAC Stadium to 40,000 seats for the Games, with 14,000 seats in legacy mode, at a cost of $1.6 billion" and be left with a training facility
|
|
|
numklpkgulftumch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xTruly crazy decision by the QLD government. So the Gabba isn’t big or new enough to host the athletics or opening ceremony, so they solve the problem by moving it an older stadium with a lower capacity of 40k, then diverting the opening ceremony to Suncorp. Absolute pure clusterfuckery of the highest magnitude. Then again, it is Labor , so no surprise. This way they can touch up the Gabba as they need to over the years. Touch up ? "keep the Gabba operational and compliant beyond 2032 at a cost of $1 billion." and be left with a 2nd class Stadium at the end of it's life "A $1 billion spend at the Gabba does not increase capacity or improve functionality for spectators, players, staff and hirers. Further, the Gabba works would be maintenance, rather than being part of the Sport Venue Program and under the terms of the Intergovernmental Agreement would likely reduce the Australian Government’s overall Financial contribution to the Sport Venue Program."
|
|
|
dr. bellows
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.1K,
Visits: 0
|
This looks like the triumph of cynical politics over common sense. I think Labor are hoping to wedge the Libs in the leadup to the State election later this year by opting for the worse but cheaper option. If the Libs oppose Labor's plan, Miles will accuse Libs of not caring about cost of living. Labor will be desperate after getting smashed in weekend by-elections.
|
|
|
NicCarBel
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xTruly crazy decision by the QLD government. So the Gabba isn’t big or new enough to host the athletics or opening ceremony, so they solve the problem by moving it an older stadium with a lower capacity of 40k, then diverting the opening ceremony to Suncorp. Absolute pure clusterfuckery of the highest magnitude. Then again, it is Labor , so no surprise. I dunno, smart of them to spruce up a stadium that already has an athletics track, than to build something completely new. Spruce up ? "upgrade QSAC Stadium to 40,000 seats for the Games, with 14,000 seats in legacy mode, at a cost of $1.6 billion" and be left with a training facility I mean... it's at 48,500 at the moment if I'm believing the online numbers correctly...
|
|
|
NicCarBel
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xTruly crazy decision by the QLD government. So the Gabba isn’t big or new enough to host the athletics or opening ceremony, so they solve the problem by moving it an older stadium with a lower capacity of 40k, then diverting the opening ceremony to Suncorp. Absolute pure clusterfuckery of the highest magnitude. Then again, it is Labor , so no surprise. This way they can touch up the Gabba as they need to over the years. Touch up ? "keep the Gabba operational and compliant beyond 2032 at a cost of $1 billion." and be left with a 2nd class Stadium at the end of it's life "A $1 billion spend at the Gabba does not increase capacity or improve functionality for spectators, players, staff and hirers. Further, the Gabba works would be maintenance, rather than being part of the Sport Venue Program and under the terms of the Intergovernmental Agreement would likely reduce the Australian Government’s overall Financial contribution to the Sport Venue Program." You can keep things operational and compliant for a long time. MCG and SCG have been around in their current location for 170 years. Sure, the stands have been redeveloped, I highly doubt that the Gabba needs as much work as they would have had over the years
|
|
|
roosty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 758,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xTruly crazy decision by the QLD government. So the Gabba isn’t big or new enough to host the athletics or opening ceremony, so they solve the problem by moving it an older stadium with a lower capacity of 40k, then diverting the opening ceremony to Suncorp. Absolute pure clusterfuckery of the highest magnitude. Then again, it is Labor , so no surprise. I dunno, smart of them to spruce up a stadium that already has an athletics track, than to build something completely new. This way they can touch up the Gabba as they need to over the years. Remember, that was also expanded on just after Lang Park (unless we got fed backwards news in NSW 20 years ago). To me, personally, it doesn't make sense to build a new stadium that, after the Olympics, the major sports that will use it have no relation to the Olympic Games whatsoever. Remember Rio did similar, despite all the other white elephants they built. Lol the athletics track will need to replaced anyway. So spend $1.5 billion on a temporary stadium in order to save $1 million on installing an athletics track at the Gabba? Then spending another $1 billion on the Gabba to bring it up to code. Then spending another $10 billion plus in 15-20 years anyway because the Gabba is no longer fit for purpose.
You would have to be a pretty rusted on Labor voter to think that is good economics.
|
|
|
numklpkgulftumch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xTruly crazy decision by the QLD government. So the Gabba isn’t big or new enough to host the athletics or opening ceremony, so they solve the problem by moving it an older stadium with a lower capacity of 40k, then diverting the opening ceremony to Suncorp. Absolute pure clusterfuckery of the highest magnitude. Then again, it is Labor , so no surprise. I dunno, smart of them to spruce up a stadium that already has an athletics track, than to build something completely new. Spruce up ? "upgrade QSAC Stadium to 40,000 seats for the Games, with 14,000 seats in legacy mode, at a cost of $1.6 billion" and be left with a training facility I mean... it's at 48,500 at the moment if I'm believing the online numbers correctly... Temp seating will be 50 years old by 2032. Whole place has to be rebuilt Here's the report , its very easy to read https://www.statedevelopment.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0029/87581/sport-venue-review-23.pdf
|
|
|
numklpkgulftumch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xTruly crazy decision by the QLD government. So the Gabba isn’t big or new enough to host the athletics or opening ceremony, so they solve the problem by moving it an older stadium with a lower capacity of 40k, then diverting the opening ceremony to Suncorp. Absolute pure clusterfuckery of the highest magnitude. Then again, it is Labor , so no surprise. This way they can touch up the Gabba as they need to over the years. Touch up ? "keep the Gabba operational and compliant beyond 2032 at a cost of $1 billion." and be left with a 2nd class Stadium at the end of it's life "A $1 billion spend at the Gabba does not increase capacity or improve functionality for spectators, players, staff and hirers. Further, the Gabba works would be maintenance, rather than being part of the Sport Venue Program and under the terms of the Intergovernmental Agreement would likely reduce the Australian Government’s overall Financial contribution to the Sport Venue Program." You can keep things operational and compliant for a long time. MCG and SCG have been around in their current location for 170 years. Sure, the stands have been redeveloped, I highly doubt that the Gabba needs as much work as they would have had over the years Just a couple of small quotes, but there's heaps more in the report  The Panel observed that all major international standard oval stadiums in Australia are located in parkland settings.
This creates operational efficiencies and a smoother transition of patrons into and out of the venue.
As other states take steps to improve stadium infrastructure (including most recently inAdelaide, Perth, Geelong and soon in Hobart), the Gabba will struggle to attract major sporting events and concerts without significant improvement and investment.
Indeed, this is already starting to emerge in Test Cricket where the Gabba is no longer the preferred venue for the First test of the summer series (with the First test now being played at Optus Stadium in Western Australia). 
|
|
|
banzai
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 408,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xTruly crazy decision by the QLD government. So the Gabba isn’t big or new enough to host the athletics or opening ceremony, so they solve the problem by moving it an older stadium with a lower capacity of 40k, then diverting the opening ceremony to Suncorp. Absolute pure clusterfuckery of the highest magnitude. Then again, it is Labor , so no surprise. I dunno, smart of them to spruce up a stadium that already has an athletics track, than to build something completely new. This way they can touch up the Gabba as they need to over the years. Remember, that was also expanded on just after Lang Park (unless we got fed backwards news in NSW 20 years ago). To me, personally, it doesn't make sense to build a new stadium that, after the Olympics, the major sports that will use it have no relation to the Olympic Games whatsoever. Remember Rio did similar, despite all the other white elephants they built. Lol 1.6 Billion on an Athletics Stadium that will be used for 1 week then be completely useless. That is absolute madness. Then they acknowledge the Gabba will need a billion or so spent at some point anyway. As well as Lang Park will be getting old soon.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
You know the Olympics are a dead duck when a shithole like Brisbane is the only bidder and through gritted teeth the IOC awards it to them. (Because of course you have to have it somewhere.) QUEENSLANDER!!!!!
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xTruly crazy decision by the QLD government. So the Gabba isn’t big or new enough to host the athletics or opening ceremony, so they solve the problem by moving it an older stadium with a lower capacity of 40k, then diverting the opening ceremony to Suncorp. Absolute pure clusterfuckery of the highest magnitude. Then again, it is Labor , so no surprise. I dunno, smart of them to spruce up a stadium that already has an athletics track, than to build something completely new. This way they can touch up the Gabba as they need to over the years. Remember, that was also expanded on just after Lang Park (unless we got fed backwards news in NSW 20 years ago). To me, personally, it doesn't make sense to build a new stadium that, after the Olympics, the major sports that will use it have no relation to the Olympic Games whatsoever. Remember Rio did similar, despite all the other white elephants they built. Lol the athletics track will need to replaced anyway. So spend $1.5 billion on a temporary stadium in order to save $1 million on installing an athletics track at the Gabba? Then spending another $1 billion on the Gabba to bring it up to code. Then spending another $10 billion plus in 15-20 years anyway because the Gabba is no longer fit for purpose.
You would have to be a pretty rusted on Labor voter to think that is good economics.
Labour or LNP here Rusty and you'd struggle. This is a case of trying to polish a turd no matter which way you look at it. In any case when Labour get booted this election coming up we'll see if the LNP up there can roll that turd in glitter after all.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
bohemia
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Brisbane is making the Athens Olympics look organised
|
|
|
roosty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 758,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xTruly crazy decision by the QLD government. So the Gabba isn’t big or new enough to host the athletics or opening ceremony, so they solve the problem by moving it an older stadium with a lower capacity of 40k, then diverting the opening ceremony to Suncorp. Absolute pure clusterfuckery of the highest magnitude. Then again, it is Labor , so no surprise. I dunno, smart of them to spruce up a stadium that already has an athletics track, than to build something completely new. This way they can touch up the Gabba as they need to over the years. Remember, that was also expanded on just after Lang Park (unless we got fed backwards news in NSW 20 years ago). To me, personally, it doesn't make sense to build a new stadium that, after the Olympics, the major sports that will use it have no relation to the Olympic Games whatsoever. Remember Rio did similar, despite all the other white elephants they built. Lol the athletics track will need to replaced anyway. So spend $1.5 billion on a temporary stadium in order to save $1 million on installing an athletics track at the Gabba? Then spending another $1 billion on the Gabba to bring it up to code. Then spending another $10 billion plus in 15-20 years anyway because the Gabba is no longer fit for purpose.
You would have to be a pretty rusted on Labor voter to think that is good economics.
Labour or LNP here Rusty and you'd struggle. This is a case of trying to polish a turd no matter which way you look at it. In any case when Labour get booted this election coming up we'll see if the LNP up there can roll that turd in glitter after all. Not at all. Brisbane and SEQ already has a bunch of facilities and stadia that are Olympics ready. Cycling, tennis. basketball etc. It just needs an indoor venue to activate Roma Station and a new oval 50-60k stadium to futureproof Brisbane for international cricket and AFL. Bris needs these things anyway, the Olympics is a perfect excuse to get them built whilst using federal funds. If it costs $3.5 billion, while that is a lot of money, it will only get more expensive as time goes by. Labor’s plan however is a car crash.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xTruly crazy decision by the QLD government. So the Gabba isn’t big or new enough to host the athletics or opening ceremony, so they solve the problem by moving it an older stadium with a lower capacity of 40k, then diverting the opening ceremony to Suncorp. Absolute pure clusterfuckery of the highest magnitude. Then again, it is Labor , so no surprise. I dunno, smart of them to spruce up a stadium that already has an athletics track, than to build something completely new. This way they can touch up the Gabba as they need to over the years. Remember, that was also expanded on just after Lang Park (unless we got fed backwards news in NSW 20 years ago). To me, personally, it doesn't make sense to build a new stadium that, after the Olympics, the major sports that will use it have no relation to the Olympic Games whatsoever. Remember Rio did similar, despite all the other white elephants they built. Lol the athletics track will need to replaced anyway. So spend $1.5 billion on a temporary stadium in order to save $1 million on installing an athletics track at the Gabba? Then spending another $1 billion on the Gabba to bring it up to code. Then spending another $10 billion plus in 15-20 years anyway because the Gabba is no longer fit for purpose.
You would have to be a pretty rusted on Labor voter to think that is good economics.
Labour or LNP here Rusty and you'd struggle. This is a case of trying to polish a turd no matter which way you look at it. In any case when Labour get booted this election coming up we'll see if the LNP up there can roll that turd in glitter after all. Not at all. Brisbane and SEQ already has a bunch of facilities and stadia that are Olympics ready. Cycling, tennis. basketball etc. It just needs an indoor venue to activate Roma Station and a new oval 50-60k stadium to futureproof Brisbane for international cricket and AFL. Bris needs these things anyway, the Olympics is a perfect excuse to get them built whilst using federal funds. If it costs $3.5 billion, while that is a lot of money, it will only get more expensive as time goes by. Labor’s plan however is a car crash. Well in a few months time the LNP can have a crack. Let's see what they do.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
NicCarBel
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xTruly crazy decision by the QLD government. So the Gabba isn’t big or new enough to host the athletics or opening ceremony, so they solve the problem by moving it an older stadium with a lower capacity of 40k, then diverting the opening ceremony to Suncorp. Absolute pure clusterfuckery of the highest magnitude. Then again, it is Labor , so no surprise. I dunno, smart of them to spruce up a stadium that already has an athletics track, than to build something completely new. This way they can touch up the Gabba as they need to over the years. Remember, that was also expanded on just after Lang Park (unless we got fed backwards news in NSW 20 years ago). To me, personally, it doesn't make sense to build a new stadium that, after the Olympics, the major sports that will use it have no relation to the Olympic Games whatsoever. Remember Rio did similar, despite all the other white elephants they built. Lol the athletics track will need to replaced anyway. So spend $1.5 billion on a temporary stadium in order to save $1 million on installing an athletics track at the Gabba? Then spending another $1 billion on the Gabba to bring it up to code. Then spending another $10 billion plus in 15-20 years anyway because the Gabba is no longer fit for purpose.
You would have to be a pretty rusted on Labor voter to think that is good economics.
Labour or LNP here Rusty and you'd struggle. This is a case of trying to polish a turd no matter which way you look at it. In any case when Labour get booted this election coming up we'll see if the LNP up there can roll that turd in glitter after all. Not at all. Brisbane and SEQ already has a bunch of facilities and stadia that are Olympics ready. Cycling, tennis. basketball etc. It just needs an indoor venue to activate Roma Station and a new oval 50-60k stadium to futureproof Brisbane for international cricket and AFL. Bris needs these things anyway, the Olympics is a perfect excuse to get them built whilst using federal funds. If it costs $3.5 billion, while that is a lot of money, it will only get more expensive as time goes by. Labor’s plan however is a car crash. And that goes back to my original point. Why should the Olympic Games futureproof international cricket and AFL? Personally, you're all making valid points from a QLD taxpayer point of view (long term use within the wider state) - I'm not one so I can't really comment on that. We're in a football forum, so that's why I'm bringing up this perspective. What's been lost in the media is that QLD Gov is still putting forward about half a billion to refurbishing the Gabba before the Olympics...
|
|
|
roosty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 758,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xTruly crazy decision by the QLD government. So the Gabba isn’t big or new enough to host the athletics or opening ceremony, so they solve the problem by moving it an older stadium with a lower capacity of 40k, then diverting the opening ceremony to Suncorp. Absolute pure clusterfuckery of the highest magnitude. Then again, it is Labor , so no surprise. I dunno, smart of them to spruce up a stadium that already has an athletics track, than to build something completely new. This way they can touch up the Gabba as they need to over the years. Remember, that was also expanded on just after Lang Park (unless we got fed backwards news in NSW 20 years ago). To me, personally, it doesn't make sense to build a new stadium that, after the Olympics, the major sports that will use it have no relation to the Olympic Games whatsoever. Remember Rio did similar, despite all the other white elephants they built. Lol the athletics track will need to replaced anyway. So spend $1.5 billion on a temporary stadium in order to save $1 million on installing an athletics track at the Gabba? Then spending another $1 billion on the Gabba to bring it up to code. Then spending another $10 billion plus in 15-20 years anyway because the Gabba is no longer fit for purpose.
You would have to be a pretty rusted on Labor voter to think that is good economics.
Labour or LNP here Rusty and you'd struggle. This is a case of trying to polish a turd no matter which way you look at it. In any case when Labour get booted this election coming up we'll see if the LNP up there can roll that turd in glitter after all. Not at all. Brisbane and SEQ already has a bunch of facilities and stadia that are Olympics ready. Cycling, tennis. basketball etc. It just needs an indoor venue to activate Roma Station and a new oval 50-60k stadium to futureproof Brisbane for international cricket and AFL. Bris needs these things anyway, the Olympics is a perfect excuse to get them built whilst using federal funds. If it costs $3.5 billion, while that is a lot of money, it will only get more expensive as time goes by. Labor’s plan however is a car crash. And that goes back to my original point. Why should the Olympic Games futureproof international cricket and AFL? Personally, you're all making valid points from a QLD taxpayer point of view (long term use within the wider state) - I'm not one so I can't really comment on that. We're in a football forum, so that's why I'm bringing up this perspective. What's been lost in the media is that QLD Gov is still putting forward about half a billion to refurbishing the Gabba before the Olympics... It’s not a real refurbishment, they aren’t building any new stands or increasing the capacity. Most likely it relates to disability access, corporate facilities, dressing rooms upgrades etc. Really exciting stuff.
It makes no sense. Why refurbish the Gabba and then spend another $1.5 billion on horrible temporary stadium with a lower capacity, horrible PT access and no pubs? Why not just do it all at the Gabba?
|
|
|
NicCarBel
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xTruly crazy decision by the QLD government. So the Gabba isn’t big or new enough to host the athletics or opening ceremony, so they solve the problem by moving it an older stadium with a lower capacity of 40k, then diverting the opening ceremony to Suncorp. Absolute pure clusterfuckery of the highest magnitude. Then again, it is Labor , so no surprise. I dunno, smart of them to spruce up a stadium that already has an athletics track, than to build something completely new. This way they can touch up the Gabba as they need to over the years. Remember, that was also expanded on just after Lang Park (unless we got fed backwards news in NSW 20 years ago). To me, personally, it doesn't make sense to build a new stadium that, after the Olympics, the major sports that will use it have no relation to the Olympic Games whatsoever. Remember Rio did similar, despite all the other white elephants they built. Lol the athletics track will need to replaced anyway. So spend $1.5 billion on a temporary stadium in order to save $1 million on installing an athletics track at the Gabba? Then spending another $1 billion on the Gabba to bring it up to code. Then spending another $10 billion plus in 15-20 years anyway because the Gabba is no longer fit for purpose.
You would have to be a pretty rusted on Labor voter to think that is good economics.
Labour or LNP here Rusty and you'd struggle. This is a case of trying to polish a turd no matter which way you look at it. In any case when Labour get booted this election coming up we'll see if the LNP up there can roll that turd in glitter after all. Not at all. Brisbane and SEQ already has a bunch of facilities and stadia that are Olympics ready. Cycling, tennis. basketball etc. It just needs an indoor venue to activate Roma Station and a new oval 50-60k stadium to futureproof Brisbane for international cricket and AFL. Bris needs these things anyway, the Olympics is a perfect excuse to get them built whilst using federal funds. If it costs $3.5 billion, while that is a lot of money, it will only get more expensive as time goes by. Labor’s plan however is a car crash. And that goes back to my original point. Why should the Olympic Games futureproof international cricket and AFL? Personally, you're all making valid points from a QLD taxpayer point of view (long term use within the wider state) - I'm not one so I can't really comment on that. We're in a football forum, so that's why I'm bringing up this perspective. What's been lost in the media is that QLD Gov is still putting forward about half a billion to refurbishing the Gabba before the Olympics... It’s not a real refurbishment, they aren’t building any new stands or increasing the capacity. Most likely it relates to disability access, corporate facilities, dressing rooms upgrades etc. Really exciting stuff.
It makes no sense. Why refurbish the Gabba and then spend another $1.5 billion on horrible temporary stadium with a lower capacity, horrible PT access and no pubs? Why not just do it all at the Gabba?
Well, as I said in the above post, why should the Olympic Games futureproof international cricket and AFL? Ok, since then, I didn't realise Cricket is actually an Olympic sport as of 2028, so that can be a factor. But this pandering of stadiums for AFL is just ridiculous. Look at all the hoopering and a-hollering that happened in Sydney with stadiums over the past 25 years, because AFL stuck their fingers in the pie.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xTruly crazy decision by the QLD government. So the Gabba isn’t big or new enough to host the athletics or opening ceremony, so they solve the problem by moving it an older stadium with a lower capacity of 40k, then diverting the opening ceremony to Suncorp. Absolute pure clusterfuckery of the highest magnitude. Then again, it is Labor , so no surprise. I dunno, smart of them to spruce up a stadium that already has an athletics track, than to build something completely new. This way they can touch up the Gabba as they need to over the years. Remember, that was also expanded on just after Lang Park (unless we got fed backwards news in NSW 20 years ago). To me, personally, it doesn't make sense to build a new stadium that, after the Olympics, the major sports that will use it have no relation to the Olympic Games whatsoever. Remember Rio did similar, despite all the other white elephants they built. Lol the athletics track will need to replaced anyway. So spend $1.5 billion on a temporary stadium in order to save $1 million on installing an athletics track at the Gabba? Then spending another $1 billion on the Gabba to bring it up to code. Then spending another $10 billion plus in 15-20 years anyway because the Gabba is no longer fit for purpose.
You would have to be a pretty rusted on Labor voter to think that is good economics.
Labour or LNP here Rusty and you'd struggle. This is a case of trying to polish a turd no matter which way you look at it. In any case when Labour get booted this election coming up we'll see if the LNP up there can roll that turd in glitter after all. Not at all. Brisbane and SEQ already has a bunch of facilities and stadia that are Olympics ready. Cycling, tennis. basketball etc. It just needs an indoor venue to activate Roma Station and a new oval 50-60k stadium to futureproof Brisbane for international cricket and AFL. Bris needs these things anyway, the Olympics is a perfect excuse to get them built whilst using federal funds. If it costs $3.5 billion, while that is a lot of money, it will only get more expensive as time goes by. Labor’s plan however is a car crash. And that goes back to my original point. Why should the Olympic Games futureproof international cricket and AFL? Personally, you're all making valid points from a QLD taxpayer point of view (long term use within the wider state) - I'm not one so I can't really comment on that. We're in a football forum, so that's why I'm bringing up this perspective. What's been lost in the media is that QLD Gov is still putting forward about half a billion to refurbishing the Gabba before the Olympics... It’s not a real refurbishment, they aren’t building any new stands or increasing the capacity. Most likely it relates to disability access, corporate facilities, dressing rooms upgrades etc. Really exciting stuff.
It makes no sense. Why refurbish the Gabba and then spend another $1.5 billion on horrible temporary stadium with a lower capacity, horrible PT access and no pubs? Why not just do it all at the Gabba?
QSAC should be knocked down and redeveloped into something actually useful. Was shit even back when they had the commonwealth games there. (Thankfully they looked to have done their dash too.) Can see the olympics in the future being given to cities that have previously hosted them (obviously not Athens or Rio) or whole countries. Why build giant new facilities for sports which never have crowds except for the olympics when they exist a 1 hour flight away.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
roosty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 758,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]Truly crazy decision by the QLD government. So the Gabba isn’t big or new enough to host the athletics or opening ceremony, so they solve the problem by moving it an older stadium with a lower capacity of 40k, then diverting the opening ceremony to Suncorp. Absolute pure clusterfuckery of the highest magnitude. Then again, it is Labor , so no surprise. I dunno, smart of them to spruce up a stadium that already has an athletics track, than to build something completely new. This way they can touch up the Gabba as they need to over the years. Remember, that was also expanded on just after Lang Park (unless we got fed backwards news in NSW 20 years ago). To me, personally, it doesn't make sense to build a new stadium that, after the Olympics, the major sports that will use it have no relation to the Olympic Games whatsoever. Remember Rio did similar, despite all the other white elephants they built. Lol the athletics track will need to replaced anyway. So spend $1.5 billion on a temporary stadium in order to save $1 million on installing an athletics track at the Gabba? Then spending another $1 billion on the Gabba to bring it up to code. Then spending another $10 billion plus in 15-20 years anyway because the Gabba is no longer fit for purpose.
You would have to be a pretty rusted on Labor voter to think that is good economics.
Labour or LNP here Rusty and you'd struggle. This is a case of trying to polish a turd no matter which way you look at it. In any case when Labour get booted this election coming up we'll see if the LNP up there can roll that turd in glitter after all. Not at all. Brisbane and SEQ already has a bunch of facilities and stadia that are Olympics ready. Cycling, tennis. basketball etc. It just needs an indoor venue to activate Roma Station and a new oval 50-60k stadium to futureproof Brisbane for international cricket and AFL. Bris needs these things anyway, the Olympics is a perfect excuse to get them built whilst using federal funds. If it costs $3.5 billion, while that is a lot of money, it will only get more expensive as time goes by. Labor’s plan however is a car crash. And that goes back to my original point. Why should the Olympic Games futureproof international cricket and AFL? Personally, you're all making valid points from a QLD taxpayer point of view (long term use within the wider state) - I'm not one so I can't really comment on that. We're in a football forum, so that's why I'm bringing up this perspective. What's been lost in the media is that QLD Gov is still putting forward about half a billion to refurbishing the Gabba before the Olympics... It’s not a real refurbishment, they aren’t building any new stands or increasing the capacity. Most likely it relates to disability access, corporate facilities, dressing rooms upgrades etc. Really exciting stuff.
It makes no sense. Why refurbish the Gabba and then spend another $1.5 billion on horrible temporary stadium with a lower capacity, horrible PT access and no pubs? Why not just do it all at the Gabba?
Well, as I said in the above post, why should the Olympic Games futureproof international cricket and AFL? Um. It shouldn’t. It just can. Kill two birds with one stone kinda thing
|
|
|
roosty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 758,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xTruly crazy decision by the QLD government. So the Gabba isn’t big or new enough to host the athletics or opening ceremony, so they solve the problem by moving it an older stadium with a lower capacity of 40k, then diverting the opening ceremony to Suncorp. Absolute pure clusterfuckery of the highest magnitude. Then again, it is Labor , so no surprise. I dunno, smart of them to spruce up a stadium that already has an athletics track, than to build something completely new. This way they can touch up the Gabba as they need to over the years. Remember, that was also expanded on just after Lang Park (unless we got fed backwards news in NSW 20 years ago). To me, personally, it doesn't make sense to build a new stadium that, after the Olympics, the major sports that will use it have no relation to the Olympic Games whatsoever. Remember Rio did similar, despite all the other white elephants they built. Lol the athletics track will need to replaced anyway. So spend $1.5 billion on a temporary stadium in order to save $1 million on installing an athletics track at the Gabba? Then spending another $1 billion on the Gabba to bring it up to code. Then spending another $10 billion plus in 15-20 years anyway because the Gabba is no longer fit for purpose.
You would have to be a pretty rusted on Labor voter to think that is good economics.
Labour or LNP here Rusty and you'd struggle. This is a case of trying to polish a turd no matter which way you look at it. In any case when Labour get booted this election coming up we'll see if the LNP up there can roll that turd in glitter after all. Not at all. Brisbane and SEQ already has a bunch of facilities and stadia that are Olympics ready. Cycling, tennis. basketball etc. It just needs an indoor venue to activate Roma Station and a new oval 50-60k stadium to futureproof Brisbane for international cricket and AFL. Bris needs these things anyway, the Olympics is a perfect excuse to get them built whilst using federal funds. If it costs $3.5 billion, while that is a lot of money, it will only get more expensive as time goes by. Labor’s plan however is a car crash. And that goes back to my original point. Why should the Olympic Games futureproof international cricket and AFL? Personally, you're all making valid points from a QLD taxpayer point of view (long term use within the wider state) - I'm not one so I can't really comment on that. We're in a football forum, so that's why I'm bringing up this perspective. What's been lost in the media is that QLD Gov is still putting forward about half a billion to refurbishing the Gabba before the Olympics... It’s not a real refurbishment, they aren’t building any new stands or increasing the capacity. Most likely it relates to disability access, corporate facilities, dressing rooms upgrades etc. Really exciting stuff.
It makes no sense. Why refurbish the Gabba and then spend another $1.5 billion on horrible temporary stadium with a lower capacity, horrible PT access and no pubs? Why not just do it all at the Gabba?
Why build giant new facilities for sports which never have crowds except for the olympics when they exist a 1 hour flight away. That’s whey they gave it to Brisbane. Most of the infrastructure is ready to go. No need to build an Olympic village or any expensive white elephants. Gabba needed an upgrade anyway and the Brisbane Live venue had been on the cards for years before any Olympics talk. Ironically that is what QLD Labor is now doing, spending $1.5 billion to build a white elephant at QSAC. Smart politics by Labor, if they cancel the games they will have to explain to taxpayers why they are costing them $500 million in compensation , whereas now they can argue they are saving taxpayer billions. Funny how politics spoils everything.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xTruly crazy decision by the QLD government. So the Gabba isn’t big or new enough to host the athletics or opening ceremony, so they solve the problem by moving it an older stadium with a lower capacity of 40k, then diverting the opening ceremony to Suncorp. Absolute pure clusterfuckery of the highest magnitude. Then again, it is Labor , so no surprise. I dunno, smart of them to spruce up a stadium that already has an athletics track, than to build something completely new. This way they can touch up the Gabba as they need to over the years. Remember, that was also expanded on just after Lang Park (unless we got fed backwards news in NSW 20 years ago). To me, personally, it doesn't make sense to build a new stadium that, after the Olympics, the major sports that will use it have no relation to the Olympic Games whatsoever. Remember Rio did similar, despite all the other white elephants they built. Lol the athletics track will need to replaced anyway. So spend $1.5 billion on a temporary stadium in order to save $1 million on installing an athletics track at the Gabba? Then spending another $1 billion on the Gabba to bring it up to code. Then spending another $10 billion plus in 15-20 years anyway because the Gabba is no longer fit for purpose.
You would have to be a pretty rusted on Labor voter to think that is good economics.
Labour or LNP here Rusty and you'd struggle. This is a case of trying to polish a turd no matter which way you look at it. In any case when Labour get booted this election coming up we'll see if the LNP up there can roll that turd in glitter after all. Not at all. Brisbane and SEQ already has a bunch of facilities and stadia that are Olympics ready. Cycling, tennis. basketball etc. It just needs an indoor venue to activate Roma Station and a new oval 50-60k stadium to futureproof Brisbane for international cricket and AFL. Bris needs these things anyway, the Olympics is a perfect excuse to get them built whilst using federal funds. If it costs $3.5 billion, while that is a lot of money, it will only get more expensive as time goes by. Labor’s plan however is a car crash. And that goes back to my original point. Why should the Olympic Games futureproof international cricket and AFL? Personally, you're all making valid points from a QLD taxpayer point of view (long term use within the wider state) - I'm not one so I can't really comment on that. We're in a football forum, so that's why I'm bringing up this perspective. What's been lost in the media is that QLD Gov is still putting forward about half a billion to refurbishing the Gabba before the Olympics... It’s not a real refurbishment, they aren’t building any new stands or increasing the capacity. Most likely it relates to disability access, corporate facilities, dressing rooms upgrades etc. Really exciting stuff.
It makes no sense. Why refurbish the Gabba and then spend another $1.5 billion on horrible temporary stadium with a lower capacity, horrible PT access and no pubs? Why not just do it all at the Gabba?
Why build giant new facilities for sports which never have crowds except for the olympics when they exist a 1 hour flight away. That’s whey they gave it to Brisbane. Most of the infrastructure is ready to go. No need to build an Olympic village or any expensive white elephants. Gabba needed an upgrade anyway and the Brisbane Live venue had been on the cards for years before any Olympics talk. They gave it to Brisbane because they were the only ones silly enough to volunteer to have a giant millstone hung around their neck. Every other city said 'fuck that'. In any case I'm not talking specifically about Brisbane but seeing we are, does Brisbane have a whitewater kayaking course, for example, or will that need to be built at a cost of millions? Because there's a perfectly good Olympic standard one in Penrith an hour away. No no, they're going to build one at a cost of millions. Waste of money and within 2 weeks of the closing ceremony a white elephant. That's my point.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
numklpkgulftumch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xTruly crazy decision by the QLD government. So the Gabba isn’t big or new enough to host the athletics or opening ceremony, so they solve the problem by moving it an older stadium with a lower capacity of 40k, then diverting the opening ceremony to Suncorp. Absolute pure clusterfuckery of the highest magnitude. Then again, it is Labor , so no surprise. I dunno, smart of them to spruce up a stadium that already has an athletics track, than to build something completely new. This way they can touch up the Gabba as they need to over the years. Remember, that was also expanded on just after Lang Park (unless we got fed backwards news in NSW 20 years ago). To me, personally, it doesn't make sense to build a new stadium that, after the Olympics, the major sports that will use it have no relation to the Olympic Games whatsoever. Remember Rio did similar, despite all the other white elephants they built. Lol the athletics track will need to replaced anyway. So spend $1.5 billion on a temporary stadium in order to save $1 million on installing an athletics track at the Gabba? Then spending another $1 billion on the Gabba to bring it up to code. Then spending another $10 billion plus in 15-20 years anyway because the Gabba is no longer fit for purpose.
You would have to be a pretty rusted on Labor voter to think that is good economics.
Labour or LNP here Rusty and you'd struggle. This is a case of trying to polish a turd no matter which way you look at it. In any case when Labour get booted this election coming up we'll see if the LNP up there can roll that turd in glitter after all. Not at all. Brisbane and SEQ already has a bunch of facilities and stadia that are Olympics ready. Cycling, tennis. basketball etc. It just needs an indoor venue to activate Roma Station and a new oval 50-60k stadium to futureproof Brisbane for international cricket and AFL. Bris needs these things anyway, the Olympics is a perfect excuse to get them built whilst using federal funds. If it costs $3.5 billion, while that is a lot of money, it will only get more expensive as time goes by. Labor’s plan however is a car crash. And that goes back to my original point. Why should the Olympic Games futureproof international cricket and AFL? Personally, you're all making valid points from a QLD taxpayer point of view (long term use within the wider state) - I'm not one so I can't really comment on that. We're in a football forum, so that's why I'm bringing up this perspective. What's been lost in the media is that QLD Gov is still putting forward about half a billion to refurbishing the Gabba before the Olympics... It’s not a real refurbishment, they aren’t building any new stands or increasing the capacity. Most likely it relates to disability access, corporate facilities, dressing rooms upgrades etc. Really exciting stuff.
It makes no sense. Why refurbish the Gabba and then spend another $1.5 billion on horrible temporary stadium with a lower capacity, horrible PT access and no pubs? Why not just do it all at the Gabba?
Why build giant new facilities for sports which never have crowds except for the olympics when they exist a 1 hour flight away. That’s whey they gave it to Brisbane. Most of the infrastructure is ready to go. No need to build an Olympic village or any expensive white elephants. Gabba needed an upgrade anyway and the Brisbane Live venue had been on the cards for years before any Olympics talk. They gave it to Brisbane because they were the only ones silly enough to volunteer to have a giant millstone hung around their neck. Every other city said 'fuck that'. In any case I'm not talking specifically about Brisbane but seeing we are, does Brisbane have a whitewater kayaking course, for example, or will that need to be built at a cost of millions? Because there's a perfectly good Olympic standard one in Penrith an hour away. No no, they're going to build one at a cost of millions. Waste of money and within 2 weeks of the closing ceremony a white elephant. That's my point. Finding 5.5 – The Redland Whitewater Centre proposal presents a compelling case. The Review Panel saw a range of advantages to building the facility including strong legacy outcomes There is a sound Financial model for the facility The facility provides a regional attraction which could have broader benefits to the Redlands The centre would provide a convenient training facility for State Emergency Service, Queensland Surf Lifesaving and other First responder agencies
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xTruly crazy decision by the QLD government. So the Gabba isn’t big or new enough to host the athletics or opening ceremony, so they solve the problem by moving it an older stadium with a lower capacity of 40k, then diverting the opening ceremony to Suncorp. Absolute pure clusterfuckery of the highest magnitude. Then again, it is Labor , so no surprise. I dunno, smart of them to spruce up a stadium that already has an athletics track, than to build something completely new. This way they can touch up the Gabba as they need to over the years. Remember, that was also expanded on just after Lang Park (unless we got fed backwards news in NSW 20 years ago). To me, personally, it doesn't make sense to build a new stadium that, after the Olympics, the major sports that will use it have no relation to the Olympic Games whatsoever. Remember Rio did similar, despite all the other white elephants they built. Lol the athletics track will need to replaced anyway. So spend $1.5 billion on a temporary stadium in order to save $1 million on installing an athletics track at the Gabba? Then spending another $1 billion on the Gabba to bring it up to code. Then spending another $10 billion plus in 15-20 years anyway because the Gabba is no longer fit for purpose.
You would have to be a pretty rusted on Labor voter to think that is good economics.
Labour or LNP here Rusty and you'd struggle. This is a case of trying to polish a turd no matter which way you look at it. In any case when Labour get booted this election coming up we'll see if the LNP up there can roll that turd in glitter after all. Not at all. Brisbane and SEQ already has a bunch of facilities and stadia that are Olympics ready. Cycling, tennis. basketball etc. It just needs an indoor venue to activate Roma Station and a new oval 50-60k stadium to futureproof Brisbane for international cricket and AFL. Bris needs these things anyway, the Olympics is a perfect excuse to get them built whilst using federal funds. If it costs $3.5 billion, while that is a lot of money, it will only get more expensive as time goes by. Labor’s plan however is a car crash. And that goes back to my original point. Why should the Olympic Games futureproof international cricket and AFL? Personally, you're all making valid points from a QLD taxpayer point of view (long term use within the wider state) - I'm not one so I can't really comment on that. We're in a football forum, so that's why I'm bringing up this perspective. What's been lost in the media is that QLD Gov is still putting forward about half a billion to refurbishing the Gabba before the Olympics... It’s not a real refurbishment, they aren’t building any new stands or increasing the capacity. Most likely it relates to disability access, corporate facilities, dressing rooms upgrades etc. Really exciting stuff.
It makes no sense. Why refurbish the Gabba and then spend another $1.5 billion on horrible temporary stadium with a lower capacity, horrible PT access and no pubs? Why not just do it all at the Gabba?
Why build giant new facilities for sports which never have crowds except for the olympics when they exist a 1 hour flight away. That’s whey they gave it to Brisbane. Most of the infrastructure is ready to go. No need to build an Olympic village or any expensive white elephants. Gabba needed an upgrade anyway and the Brisbane Live venue had been on the cards for years before any Olympics talk. They gave it to Brisbane because they were the only ones silly enough to volunteer to have a giant millstone hung around their neck. Every other city said 'fuck that'. In any case I'm not talking specifically about Brisbane but seeing we are, does Brisbane have a whitewater kayaking course, for example, or will that need to be built at a cost of millions? Because there's a perfectly good Olympic standard one in Penrith an hour away. No no, they're going to build one at a cost of millions. Waste of money and within 2 weeks of the closing ceremony a white elephant. That's my point. Finding 5.5 – The Redland Whitewater Centre proposal presents a compelling case. The Review Panel saw a range of advantages to building the facility including strong legacy outcomes There is a sound Financial model for the facility The facility provides a regional attraction which could have broader benefits to the Redlands The centre would provide a convenient training facility for State Emergency Service, Queensland Surf Lifesaving and other First responder agencies  Yes yes I read that too. You can retrospectively justify anything. I'm betting London to a brick that whilst they can use it it will be well in excess of anything they'll ever need. In any case pick any other sport which is niche and the facilities exist elsewhere so you don't have to spend millions building a white elephant. Maybe Bridget 'Shotgun' Mackenzie or Daryl Maguire can be given a seat on the Brisbane organising committee. They have form getting brand new giant oversized facilities for sports that are niche and undeserving.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
roosty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 758,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xTruly crazy decision by the QLD government. So the Gabba isn’t big or new enough to host the athletics or opening ceremony, so they solve the problem by moving it an older stadium with a lower capacity of 40k, then diverting the opening ceremony to Suncorp. Absolute pure clusterfuckery of the highest magnitude. Then again, it is Labor , so no surprise. I dunno, smart of them to spruce up a stadium that already has an athletics track, than to build something completely new. This way they can touch up the Gabba as they need to over the years. Remember, that was also expanded on just after Lang Park (unless we got fed backwards news in NSW 20 years ago). To me, personally, it doesn't make sense to build a new stadium that, after the Olympics, the major sports that will use it have no relation to the Olympic Games whatsoever. Remember Rio did similar, despite all the other white elephants they built. Lol the athletics track will need to replaced anyway. So spend $1.5 billion on a temporary stadium in order to save $1 million on installing an athletics track at the Gabba? Then spending another $1 billion on the Gabba to bring it up to code. Then spending another $10 billion plus in 15-20 years anyway because the Gabba is no longer fit for purpose.
You would have to be a pretty rusted on Labor voter to think that is good economics.
Labour or LNP here Rusty and you'd struggle. This is a case of trying to polish a turd no matter which way you look at it. In any case when Labour get booted this election coming up we'll see if the LNP up there can roll that turd in glitter after all. Not at all. Brisbane and SEQ already has a bunch of facilities and stadia that are Olympics ready. Cycling, tennis. basketball etc. It just needs an indoor venue to activate Roma Station and a new oval 50-60k stadium to futureproof Brisbane for international cricket and AFL. Bris needs these things anyway, the Olympics is a perfect excuse to get them built whilst using federal funds. If it costs $3.5 billion, while that is a lot of money, it will only get more expensive as time goes by. Labor’s plan however is a car crash. And that goes back to my original point. Why should the Olympic Games futureproof international cricket and AFL? Personally, you're all making valid points from a QLD taxpayer point of view (long term use within the wider state) - I'm not one so I can't really comment on that. We're in a football forum, so that's why I'm bringing up this perspective. What's been lost in the media is that QLD Gov is still putting forward about half a billion to refurbishing the Gabba before the Olympics... It’s not a real refurbishment, they aren’t building any new stands or increasing the capacity. Most likely it relates to disability access, corporate facilities, dressing rooms upgrades etc. Really exciting stuff.
It makes no sense. Why refurbish the Gabba and then spend another $1.5 billion on horrible temporary stadium with a lower capacity, horrible PT access and no pubs? Why not just do it all at the Gabba?
Why build giant new facilities for sports which never have crowds except for the olympics when they exist a 1 hour flight away. That’s whey they gave it to Brisbane. Most of the infrastructure is ready to go. No need to build an Olympic village or any expensive white elephants. Gabba needed an upgrade anyway and the Brisbane Live venue had been on the cards for years before any Olympics talk. They gave it to Brisbane because they were the only ones silly enough to volunteer to have a giant millstone hung around their neck. Every other city said 'fuck that'. In any case I'm not talking specifically about Brisbane but seeing we are, does Brisbane have a whitewater kayaking course, for example, or will that need to be built at a cost of millions? Because there's a perfectly good Olympic standard one in Penrith an hour away. No no, they're going to build one at a cost of millions. Waste of money and within 2 weeks of the closing ceremony a white elephant. That's my point. It's a badly made one. They awarded the games to Brisbane 12 years before the games. It's not that we were IOCs only option, rather the business case stacked up, we were trusted and preferred. They didn't really look at anyone else. If not Brisbane, of course, of course, the 2032 games weren't going to be cancelled because every other city said "fuck that". As per my previous comment, the idea of giving it to Brisbane is most of the venues here are Olympics ready. The key word being 'most'. Some new builds will cost millions, but millions will also be earned in tourism, economic activity, in addition to all the transport infrastructure, legacy benefits, etc. At the very least, QLD will have a white water rafting facility, just like the 25 year old one in Penrith.
|
|
|
Flytox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 413,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xTruly crazy decision by the QLD government. So the Gabba isn’t big or new enough to host the athletics or opening ceremony, so they solve the problem by moving it an older stadium with a lower capacity of 40k, then diverting the opening ceremony to Suncorp. Absolute pure clusterfuckery of the highest magnitude. Then again, it is Labor , so no surprise. I dunno, smart of them to spruce up a stadium that already has an athletics track, than to build something completely new. This way they can touch up the Gabba as they need to over the years. Remember, that was also expanded on just after Lang Park (unless we got fed backwards news in NSW 20 years ago). To me, personally, it doesn't make sense to build a new stadium that, after the Olympics, the major sports that will use it have no relation to the Olympic Games whatsoever. Remember Rio did similar, despite all the other white elephants they built. The report said that the Gabba will be at the end of its useful life in 2030 so it won't be touch ups that will be required.
|
|
|
NicCarBel
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xTruly crazy decision by the QLD government. So the Gabba isn’t big or new enough to host the athletics or opening ceremony, so they solve the problem by moving it an older stadium with a lower capacity of 40k, then diverting the opening ceremony to Suncorp. Absolute pure clusterfuckery of the highest magnitude. Then again, it is Labor , so no surprise. I dunno, smart of them to spruce up a stadium that already has an athletics track, than to build something completely new. This way they can touch up the Gabba as they need to over the years. Remember, that was also expanded on just after Lang Park (unless we got fed backwards news in NSW 20 years ago). To me, personally, it doesn't make sense to build a new stadium that, after the Olympics, the major sports that will use it have no relation to the Olympic Games whatsoever. Remember Rio did similar, despite all the other white elephants they built. The report said that the Gabba will be at the end of its useful life in 2030 so it won't be touch ups that will be required. Touch ups is probably a facetious word by me. But... useful life is all up to how it's looked after. MCG has been around for 170 years, and it's most recent redevelopment in 2002-2006 for the Commonwealth Games cost $450m, all while being able to still use at 70,000 capacity during the 4 years. Yes, I know inflation means that figure is more like $750m in today's money. But 'useful life' isn't all about knockdown rebuilds / relocation. (See Roosty's post below that summarises what's in motion for the Gabba with this QSAC decision) It’s not a real refurbishment, they aren’t building any new stands or increasing the capacity. Most likely it relates to disability access, corporate facilities, dressing rooms upgrades etc. Really exciting stuff.
|
|
|