Really?

=d> =d> =d> =d>

you left out the

NER NER NA NER NER#-o #-o

lucky they had the previous government to thank for doing such a fine job and leaving things in a great position......

:lol: accusing me of being infantile.

Labor, Liberal, Greens, Nationals... either way you're voting for politicians. Other than those with vested interests in one party or the other there's no real reason to trust any of them.

We cant really trust them, but then again, you want to trust the racist and clueless Tony Abbott?

You forgot sexist.

This.

When will people realise that Government Debt is not the same as Average Joe's credit card debt.

-PB

They freak out because they see countries like Greece, the USA and Italy freaking out over their national debt.

Essential Research put a question to a sample of voters:
Q. Compared to other developed countries, do you think Australia’s national debt is higher, lower or about the same?

59% of Labor voters got the answer factually correct, 54% of Greens, but only 38% of Coalition voters.

Nah, no correlation between IQ and voting preference.....

You're going to need to produce evidence of Abbotts racism, Outrageous claim

lol...funny how the team who ranted on and on and on about negative policy and attitude have delved to gutter levels to discredit the opposition.....much the same as the do gooders in here slagging me....they have no answer no response and leap to personal attack at any opportunity......

anyone who compares Australia's economy with the USA or other nations that are in trouble.....last time i checked none of these countries have just been through a decade long huge resources boom and the highest revenues on record, none of them have a regulated banking system as robust as ours and still our economy performs like a 4 cyclinder datson with a fucked radiator and a cracked distributor cap......where we should be a turbo V12 on high octane fuel.....

so after promises and lies we are 300 billion dollars worse off...which is ok.......but NO PLAN OF HOW TO CONTROL IT OR REDUCE IT......you can say what you like about Abbott and i don't really care.....i am sick to death of a bunch of backstabbing morons who can't run a chook raffle.......over 6 years continually they have failed to get ANY of their budgets within a country fucken mile of their own targets..........just pathetic and incompetent......simple facts

Edited by batfink: 13/8/2013 06:30:24 PM

Just because you don't know what Australia's national debt in relation to other nations is doesn't mean that you have an inferior IQ.

You forgot mysoginist.

You guys are hilarious. Keep sticking to Abbott bashing. Just like Labor, it's all you've got left.

desperate times call for desperate measures......

Must be just alot of unused potential.......
Seriously though, what does it say?

Well he's Anglo, wears speedos, used to play rugby - the evidence is there for all to see.

I call racism.

Yep there's that tagline again "At least we aren't Spain" "At least we aren't Greece" The Laborites cry :lol:

Yeah, calling the guy who said one of the reasons to vote for a female MP was 'sex appeal' sexist is "abbott bashing". No champ, it's calling a spade a spade.

And even then, the guy wants to be our fucking PRIME MINISTER. Pointing out his flaws is kind of the point.

So what were your views on Rudd in a titty bar six years ago?

Another question - if you're pro-Rudd, how do you know the labor machine won't dump him once he becomes unpopular if he did indeed win government?

And, leaving technicalities aside, how can he be referred to as PM Rudd when he was not the person the people elected 3 years ago?

My views of Abbott are my own, but i really dont want an idiot running this country. If you think things are bad now and that Abbott is the solution, then i feel sorry for you.

It certainly seemed like an odd place to campaign. Most of the girls working there probably can't even read the ballot forms.

Because he's been sworn into office?

Probably because Labor have made changes to the party policies to ensure that he can't be booted like he was last time.

Last i checked, it was a hung vote, so no one was elected in to office really. It was basically a sign that the people didnt want either.

No, it was a sign that different people wanted different partys in power.

Wouldnt the fact that we have different partys and people get to vote for them already be a sign of that?? :-s

You talk of "the people" as a singular entity, when in fact they are a collective who make independent decisions. It just so happened that half of them chose one side of politics over the other.

But as a collective they could not decide on a majority. They could not say, "This is the person i want to lead my/our country."