mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:rusty wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:rusty wrote:notorganic wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:I just want to know when did the free university thing die ??? And why did it get booted . 1974 - 1989. Hawke brought in HECS at the behest of Dawkins, then Howard upped the ante in 1996. Now Abbott, Pyne and their IPA overlords want to fucky the waters and Americanise the system further. Yeah who'd want sub par institutions like Princeton and Harvard when we have world leading universities like USQ and James Cook, the envy of the world. 19 out of the top 50 universities in the world are in fact American, they must be doing something right. Don't knock JCU mate, place is fucking awesome. -PB If JCU is awesome imagine how good the American universities must be. It might be trendy to knock everything American but it doesn't make it empirically true. But Marine Biology. -PB Pretty funny to use JCU and USQ as comparisons :lol: Yep there are no Universities in the US at that level :roll: Working for an org that is funded by those unis + the other major Qld unis to help with eResearch, have done a fair bit with of work with JCU in particular and they're doing some pretty cool stuff up there :) Edited by mcjules: 7/5/2014 12:13:33 PM
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
RedKat wrote:The flip side though is the government ensuring there are sufficient jobs in the sectors university graduates are coming from. For example a Science degree, or even a PhD in a scientific field (something that is in general a helpful non 'hokey' uni course) does not ensure employment. Rather than cutting CSIRO and generally putting science on the backburner, the government could be incentivising this field, especially as the so called age of biotechnology awaits. Yes. Ruddy made maths and science degrees half price as a way to get students into them and then Gillard wound that back. Good idea at the time by Rudd but as you say if these degrees aren't valued by society or the government isn't employing people in those fields a lot of graduates will be without a job even though they are highly qualified. As for biotechnology. Google 3D printing of arteries and be amazed. This is the next big thing.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
General Ashnak
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 18K,
Visits: 0
|
RedKat wrote:rusty wrote:notorganic wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:I just want to know when did the free university thing die ??? And why did it get booted . 1974 - 1989. Hawke brought in HECS at the behest of Dawkins, then Howard upped the ante in 1996. Now Abbott, Pyne and their IPA overlords want to fucky the waters and Americanise the system further. Yeah who'd want sub par institutions like Princeton and Harvard when we have world leading universities like USQ and James Cook, the envy of the world. 19 out of the top 50 universities in the world are in fact American, they must be doing something right. Thats ridiculous. Australia has universities like University of Sydney and University of Melbourne while America has University of Texas at Dallas and Oregon State University so Australia must be better. #-o #-o #-o What a ridiculous ridiculous comparison. Those universities you mention are good because of their history, not because of the current government approach to universities. The fact is the American system extremely disadvantages those who are not able to afford a university degree and even those who are able to get through are left with huge huge debts that they spend most of their professional career paying off. They are also massive, as in have huge numbers of students, which means they have huge amounts of money. So of course they are better.
The thing about football - the important thing about football - is its not just about football. - Sir Terry Pratchett in Unseen Academicals For pro/rel in Australia across the entire pyramid, the removal of artificial impediments to the development of the game and its players. On sabbatical Youth Coach and formerly part of The Cove FC
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
What are the other ivy league schools ?? I got family over there and one of my cousins got a scholarship at the other ivy league schools . He emailed me the fees if he didn't get a scholarship :😭😖
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
RedKat wrote:rusty wrote:notorganic wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:I just want to know when did the free university thing die ??? And why did it get booted . 1974 - 1989. Hawke brought in HECS at the behest of Dawkins, then Howard upped the ante in 1996. Now Abbott, Pyne and their IPA overlords want to fucky the waters and Americanise the system further. Yeah who'd want sub par institutions like Princeton and Harvard when we have world leading universities like USQ and James Cook, the envy of the world. 19 out of the top 50 universities in the world are in fact American, they must be doing something right. Thats ridiculous. Australia has universities like University of Sydney and University of Melbourne while America has University of Texas at Dallas and Oregon State University so Australia must be better. #-o #-o #-o What a ridiculous ridiculous comparison. Those universities you mention are good because of their history, not because of the current government approach to universities. The fact is the American system extremely disadvantages those who are not able to afford a university degree and even those who are able to get through are left with huge huge debts that they spend most of their professional career paying off. We have a "Group of Eight" that are generally known for their prestige. I actually don't think there's much difference in the education quality across most universities (certainly in SA the big 3 are all pretty similar) but for research that's a different matter.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
stefcep
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
RedKat wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:RedKat wrote:The flip side though is the government ensuring there are sufficient jobs in the sectors university graduates are coming from. For example a Science degree, or even a PhD in a scientific field (something that is in general a helpful non 'hokey' uni course) does not ensure employment. Rather than cutting CSIRO and generally putting science on the backburner, the government could be incentivising this field, especially as the so called age of biotechnology awaits. Yes. Ruddy made maths and science degrees half price as a way to get students into them and then Gillard wound that back. Good idea at the time by Rudd but as you say if these degrees aren't valued by society or the government isn't employing people in those fields a lot of graduates will be without a job even though they are highly qualified. As for biotechnology. Google 3D printing of arteries and be amazed. This is the next big thing. Exactly. We should be massively incentivising scientific degrees as well as creating jobs by increasing the funding in the sector. The government should be getting what it can out of whats left of the mining boom while preparing the next generation for biotechnology. I now of people who have gotten as far as a PhD in science but struggled to find a job and resorted to things such as teaching because not only can they make more teaching in a private school, but theres more jobs for them than in science. Science in Australia is not respected. Never has been. Unless you're a TV quiz winner . My son just completed year 12 last year, and is now studying to be a civil engineer. Physics and maths were his forte', but his job prospects are better away from those fields. Most of his friends went on to business and accounting. I
|
|
|
stefcep
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:I just want to know when did the free university thing die ??? And why did it get booted . Shamed to say as a gen X, I was there laying on Melbourne's lawns when some of those radical Arts students came by shouting "No Fees!! No Fees!! Act now: Its the thin edge of the wedge". We just looked, shrugged our shoulders and said:"Its only a few hundred bucks a year-how bad can it get". And continued sampling my Chocolate Appreciation Society Bag of cheap Freddo Frogs and reading Farrago Magazine. Oblivious of what was to come. And now my son faces a $50,000 plus HECS debt, (or whatever its called) Edited by stefcep: 7/5/2014 04:36:58 PM
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
stefcep wrote:RedKat wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:RedKat wrote:The flip side though is the government ensuring there are sufficient jobs in the sectors university graduates are coming from. For example a Science degree, or even a PhD in a scientific field (something that is in general a helpful non 'hokey' uni course) does not ensure employment. Rather than cutting CSIRO and generally putting science on the backburner, the government could be incentivising this field, especially as the so called age of biotechnology awaits. Yes. Ruddy made maths and science degrees half price as a way to get students into them and then Gillard wound that back. Good idea at the time by Rudd but as you say if these degrees aren't valued by society or the government isn't employing people in those fields a lot of graduates will be without a job even though they are highly qualified. As for biotechnology. Google 3D printing of arteries and be amazed. This is the next big thing. Exactly. We should be massively incentivising scientific degrees as well as creating jobs by increasing the funding in the sector. The government should be getting what it can out of whats left of the mining boom while preparing the next generation for biotechnology. I now of people who have gotten as far as a PhD in science but struggled to find a job and resorted to things such as teaching because not only can they make more teaching in a private school, but theres more jobs for them than in science. Science in Australia is not respected. Never has been. Unless you're a TV quiz winner . My son just completed year 12 last year, and is now studying to be a civil engineer. Physics and maths were his forte', but his job prospects are better away from those fields. Most of his friends went on to business and accounting. I Agree ,science isn't looked upon greatly . Sad our best and brightest have to go o/s and get jobs and once they do something we laud them as an Aussie scientific genius . Unless you kick a ball or play sports ,respect won't be afforded to you . Look at our artists , medical people ,etc etc .
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
stefcep wrote:RedKat wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:RedKat wrote:The flip side though is the government ensuring there are sufficient jobs in the sectors university graduates are coming from. For example a Science degree, or even a PhD in a scientific field (something that is in general a helpful non 'hokey' uni course) does not ensure employment. Rather than cutting CSIRO and generally putting science on the backburner, the government could be incentivising this field, especially as the so called age of biotechnology awaits. Yes. Ruddy made maths and science degrees half price as a way to get students into them and then Gillard wound that back. Good idea at the time by Rudd but as you say if these degrees aren't valued by society or the government isn't employing people in those fields a lot of graduates will be without a job even though they are highly qualified. As for biotechnology. Google 3D printing of arteries and be amazed. This is the next big thing. Exactly. We should be massively incentivising scientific degrees as well as creating jobs by increasing the funding in the sector. The government should be getting what it can out of whats left of the mining boom while preparing the next generation for biotechnology. I now of people who have gotten as far as a PhD in science but struggled to find a job and resorted to things such as teaching because not only can they make more teaching in a private school, but theres more jobs for them than in science. Science in Australia is not respected. Never has been. Unless you're a TV quiz winner . My son just completed year 12 last year, and is now studying to be a civil engineer. Physics and maths were his forte', but his job prospects are better away from those fields. Most of his friends went on to business and accounting. I hogwash there are no jobs, not because science is not respected but because there are a lack of local companies willing to employ due to a lack of entrepreneurs and the dominance of the big American and German pharmaceutical corporations if there are no jobs it doesnt matter how many science graduates you have. we have too many currently and a large portion of them are not good at what they do because its now too easy to get a science degree
|
|
|
stefcep
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:stefcep wrote:RedKat wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:RedKat wrote:The flip side though is the government ensuring there are sufficient jobs in the sectors university graduates are coming from. For example a Science degree, or even a PhD in a scientific field (something that is in general a helpful non 'hokey' uni course) does not ensure employment. Rather than cutting CSIRO and generally putting science on the backburner, the government could be incentivising this field, especially as the so called age of biotechnology awaits. Yes. Ruddy made maths and science degrees half price as a way to get students into them and then Gillard wound that back. Good idea at the time by Rudd but as you say if these degrees aren't valued by society or the government isn't employing people in those fields a lot of graduates will be without a job even though they are highly qualified. As for biotechnology. Google 3D printing of arteries and be amazed. This is the next big thing. Exactly. We should be massively incentivising scientific degrees as well as creating jobs by increasing the funding in the sector. The government should be getting what it can out of whats left of the mining boom while preparing the next generation for biotechnology. I now of people who have gotten as far as a PhD in science but struggled to find a job and resorted to things such as teaching because not only can they make more teaching in a private school, but theres more jobs for them than in science. Science in Australia is not respected. Never has been. Unless you're a TV quiz winner . My son just completed year 12 last year, and is now studying to be a civil engineer. Physics and maths were his forte', but his job prospects are better away from those fields. Most of his friends went on to business and accounting. I hogwash there are no jobs, not because science is not respected but because there are a lack of local companies willing to employ due to a lack of entrepreneurs and the dominance of the big American and German pharmaceutical corporations if there are no jobs it doesnt matter how many science graduates you have. we have too many currently and a large portion of them are not good at what they do because its now too easy to get a science degree Science is a pretty big field, y'know. I'll go out on a limb and suggest you're talking about biological/medical science-full of graduates who didn't quite make it into MBBS. Yes too many of them I agree. But physics ain't easy, chemistry ain't easy, and mathematics ain't easy. Y'know, the ones the media calls the "boffins". But you know what happens to *them* IF they score a job in private enterprise? They end up working for a dumbass douche with a BBus or BEc who failed trig in year 10, for about 1/3 of his wage.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
stefcep wrote:ricecrackers wrote:stefcep wrote:RedKat wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:RedKat wrote:The flip side though is the government ensuring there are sufficient jobs in the sectors university graduates are coming from. For example a Science degree, or even a PhD in a scientific field (something that is in general a helpful non 'hokey' uni course) does not ensure employment. Rather than cutting CSIRO and generally putting science on the backburner, the government could be incentivising this field, especially as the so called age of biotechnology awaits. Yes. Ruddy made maths and science degrees half price as a way to get students into them and then Gillard wound that back. Good idea at the time by Rudd but as you say if these degrees aren't valued by society or the government isn't employing people in those fields a lot of graduates will be without a job even though they are highly qualified. As for biotechnology. Google 3D printing of arteries and be amazed. This is the next big thing. Exactly. We should be massively incentivising scientific degrees as well as creating jobs by increasing the funding in the sector. The government should be getting what it can out of whats left of the mining boom while preparing the next generation for biotechnology. I now of people who have gotten as far as a PhD in science but struggled to find a job and resorted to things such as teaching because not only can they make more teaching in a private school, but theres more jobs for them than in science. Science in Australia is not respected. Never has been. Unless you're a TV quiz winner . My son just completed year 12 last year, and is now studying to be a civil engineer. Physics and maths were his forte', but his job prospects are better away from those fields. Most of his friends went on to business and accounting. I hogwash there are no jobs, not because science is not respected but because there are a lack of local companies willing to employ due to a lack of entrepreneurs and the dominance of the big American and German pharmaceutical corporations if there are no jobs it doesnt matter how many science graduates you have. we have too many currently and a large portion of them are not good at what they do because its now too easy to get a science degree Science is a pretty big field, y'know. I'll go out on a limb and suggest you're talking about biological/medical science-full of graduates who didn't quite make it into MBBS. Yes too many of them I agree. But physics ain't easy, chemistry ain't easy, and mathematics ain't easy. Y'know, the ones the media calls the "boffins". But you know what happens to *them* IF they score a job in private enterprise? They end up working for a dumbass douche with a BBus or BEc who failed trig in year 10, for about 1/3 of his wage. you think science isnt easy, try running a business, starting a business, managing staff and generating sales. there's a reason managers make the big bucks. they generate the income.
|
|
|
stefcep
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:stefcep wrote:ricecrackers wrote:stefcep wrote:RedKat wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:RedKat wrote:The flip side though is the government ensuring there are sufficient jobs in the sectors university graduates are coming from. For example a Science degree, or even a PhD in a scientific field (something that is in general a helpful non 'hokey' uni course) does not ensure employment. Rather than cutting CSIRO and generally putting science on the backburner, the government could be incentivising this field, especially as the so called age of biotechnology awaits. Yes. Ruddy made maths and science degrees half price as a way to get students into them and then Gillard wound that back. Good idea at the time by Rudd but as you say if these degrees aren't valued by society or the government isn't employing people in those fields a lot of graduates will be without a job even though they are highly qualified. As for biotechnology. Google 3D printing of arteries and be amazed. This is the next big thing. Exactly. We should be massively incentivising scientific degrees as well as creating jobs by increasing the funding in the sector. The government should be getting what it can out of whats left of the mining boom while preparing the next generation for biotechnology. I now of people who have gotten as far as a PhD in science but struggled to find a job and resorted to things such as teaching because not only can they make more teaching in a private school, but theres more jobs for them than in science. Science in Australia is not respected. Never has been. Unless you're a TV quiz winner . My son just completed year 12 last year, and is now studying to be a civil engineer. Physics and maths were his forte', but his job prospects are better away from those fields. Most of his friends went on to business and accounting. I hogwash there are no jobs, not because science is not respected but because there are a lack of local companies willing to employ due to a lack of entrepreneurs and the dominance of the big American and German pharmaceutical corporations if there are no jobs it doesnt matter how many science graduates you have. we have too many currently and a large portion of them are not good at what they do because its now too easy to get a science degree Science is a pretty big field, y'know. I'll go out on a limb and suggest you're talking about biological/medical science-full of graduates who didn't quite make it into MBBS. Yes too many of them I agree. But physics ain't easy, chemistry ain't easy, and mathematics ain't easy. Y'know, the ones the media calls the "boffins". But you know what happens to *them* IF they score a job in private enterprise? They end up working for a dumbass douche with a BBus or BEc who failed trig in year 10, for about 1/3 of his wage. you think science isnt easy, try running a business, starting a business, managing staff and generating sales. there's a reason managers make the big bucks. they generate the income. yeah, if the guy crunching the numbers, who understands the theory and is coming up with the ideas says"Fuck you", what will Mr Manager sell? The biggest problem with scientists is that they don't seek their worth-there's always someone who sees the work as its won reward, and will work for whatever. BTW as it happens I was in management for 3 years-in the end couldn't stand bullshitting to myself by asking my staff them to accept things I wouldn't if I were them. Otherwise known as a "cunt".
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
stefcep wrote:ricecrackers wrote:stefcep wrote:ricecrackers wrote:stefcep wrote:RedKat wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:RedKat wrote:The flip side though is the government ensuring there are sufficient jobs in the sectors university graduates are coming from. For example a Science degree, or even a PhD in a scientific field (something that is in general a helpful non 'hokey' uni course) does not ensure employment. Rather than cutting CSIRO and generally putting science on the backburner, the government could be incentivising this field, especially as the so called age of biotechnology awaits. Yes. Ruddy made maths and science degrees half price as a way to get students into them and then Gillard wound that back. Good idea at the time by Rudd but as you say if these degrees aren't valued by society or the government isn't employing people in those fields a lot of graduates will be without a job even though they are highly qualified. As for biotechnology. Google 3D printing of arteries and be amazed. This is the next big thing. Exactly. We should be massively incentivising scientific degrees as well as creating jobs by increasing the funding in the sector. The government should be getting what it can out of whats left of the mining boom while preparing the next generation for biotechnology. I now of people who have gotten as far as a PhD in science but struggled to find a job and resorted to things such as teaching because not only can they make more teaching in a private school, but theres more jobs for them than in science. Science in Australia is not respected. Never has been. Unless you're a TV quiz winner . My son just completed year 12 last year, and is now studying to be a civil engineer. Physics and maths were his forte', but his job prospects are better away from those fields. Most of his friends went on to business and accounting. I hogwash there are no jobs, not because science is not respected but because there are a lack of local companies willing to employ due to a lack of entrepreneurs and the dominance of the big American and German pharmaceutical corporations if there are no jobs it doesnt matter how many science graduates you have. we have too many currently and a large portion of them are not good at what they do because its now too easy to get a science degree Science is a pretty big field, y'know. I'll go out on a limb and suggest you're talking about biological/medical science-full of graduates who didn't quite make it into MBBS. Yes too many of them I agree. But physics ain't easy, chemistry ain't easy, and mathematics ain't easy. Y'know, the ones the media calls the "boffins". But you know what happens to *them* IF they score a job in private enterprise? They end up working for a dumbass douche with a BBus or BEc who failed trig in year 10, for about 1/3 of his wage. you think science isnt easy, try running a business, starting a business, managing staff and generating sales. there's a reason managers make the big bucks. they generate the income. yeah, if the guy crunching the numbers, who understands the theory and is coming up with the ideas says"Fuck you", what will Mr Manager sell? The biggest problem with scientists is that they don't seek their worth-there's always someone who sees the work as its won reward, and will work for whatever. BTW as it happens I was in management for 3 years-in the end couldn't stand bullshitting to myself by asking my staff them to accept things I wouldn't if I were them. Otherwise known as a "cunt". sounds like peter principle and management wasn't for you if there were a shortage of such experts they could name their price. fact is there isn't so market rates apply. they have the option to go overseas but only because the demand is higher due to there being more entrepreneurs with a can do attitude than can be found in Australia where everyone seems to think the world owes them something due to some entitlement mentality. Edited by ricecrackers: 7/5/2014 07:28:12 PM
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
^^ Such am upbeat chappy.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
RedKat wrote: Thats ridiculous. Australia has universities like University of Sydney and University of Melbourne while America has University of Texas at Dallas and Oregon State University so Australia must be better. #-o #-o #-o What a ridiculous ridiculous comparison. Those universities you mention are good because of their history, not because of the current government approach to universities.
The fact is the American system extremely disadvantages those who are not able to afford a university degree and even those who are able to get through are left with huge huge debts that they spend most of their professional career paying off.
I can't see what's ridiculous about it. It's a fact 19 of the top 50 universities are American. I'm sure there's more to the rankings every year than just "history", otherwise the rankings would stay the same every year, those institutions would become just one year older. It's quite a feat for a single country to have nearly half of the worlds top learning institutions, and many more in the top 100, 200 and 300. America is in fact the fourth most educated country in the world, according to Time. They must be doing something right... Fact is government subsidised student loans are available to anyone in the US, the difference between here and their is they have to pay theirs back, whereas in Australia much of the debt never gets repaid. That unpaid debt ends of valuable taxpayer dollars down to the toilet, never to be seen again. Tertiary education is also affordable in the US, from about $9k per year to attend a state university. Of course some of the more prestigious unis charge more, as is their right, but those higher charges often lead to higher incomes and better employment prospects. It's called an investment. It's really not that bad that, it's just more trendy America bashing.
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
But they're the third most populace country and the most populace first world nation by a long way.
They should be the "most educated country in the world." Not the 4th.
Thats actually a bit of an indictment to the US
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
u4486662 wrote:But they're the third most populace country and the most populace first world nation by a long way.
They should be the "most educated country in the world." Not the 4th.
Thats actually a bit of an indictment to the US They have numerically the most graduates for any developed nation, but they are fourth in terms of a percentage of the population, which is far from an indictment. By all means if there are countries with more successful formulas let's look as theirs as well, but let's not lampoon America by suggesting it is some sort of archetype for academic unfairness and failure. What crap.
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:RedKat wrote: Thats ridiculous. Australia has universities like University of Sydney and University of Melbourne while America has University of Texas at Dallas and Oregon State University so Australia must be better. #-o #-o #-o What a ridiculous ridiculous comparison. Those universities you mention are good because of their history, not because of the current government approach to universities.
The fact is the American system extremely disadvantages those who are not able to afford a university degree and even those who are able to get through are left with huge huge debts that they spend most of their professional career paying off.
I can't see what's ridiculous about it. It's a fact 19 of the top 50 universities are American. I'm sure there's more to the rankings every year than just "history", otherwise the rankings would stay the same every year, those institutions would become just one year older. It's quite a feat for a single country to have nearly half of the worlds top learning institutions, and many more in the top 100, 200 and 300. America is in fact the fourth most educated country in the world, according to Time. They must be doing something right... Fact is government subsidised student loans are available to anyone in the US, the difference between here and their is they have to pay theirs back, whereas in Australia much of the debt never gets repaid. That unpaid debt ends of valuable taxpayer dollars down to the toilet, never to be seen again. Tertiary education is also affordable in the US, from about $9k per year to attend a state university. Of course some of the more prestigious unis charge more, as is their right, but those higher charges often lead to higher incomes and better employment prospects. It's called an investment. It's really not that bad that, it's just more trendy America bashing. I have no issue with forcing the loans to be paid but from my understanding it's regular repayments like any other loan and if you fall into financial trouble it affects your credit rating. I think the government can force more to be paid off without taking such drastic measures. Changing it to start paying as soon as you earn minimum wage has its merits. It kind of pissed me off when I got my first job as a grad and I wasn't earning enough to start paying anything so the loan was just going up and up. Potentially using part of your inheritance to pay it off if you still have debt when you pass away (as long as if you don't it doesn't get handed down to your next of kin) might be a good idea too. We find ways to tax people's earnings from overseas so why not also for HECS/HELP?
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
DB-PGFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 499,
Visits: 0
|
Munrubenmuz wrote:^^ Such am upbeat chappy. Give him a break. His wife just recently left him.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Munrubenmuz wrote:^^ Such am upbeat chappy. i'm not the one whingeing you on the other hand seem to have been burnt rather badly when you decided to take me on. let it be a lesson to you. :-$
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
DB-PGFC wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:^^ Such am upbeat chappy. Give him a break. His wife just recently left him. liar :^o [-x
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:^^ Such am upbeat chappy. i'm not the one whingeing you on the other hand seem to have been burnt rather badly when you decided to take me on. let it be a lesson to you. :-$  -PB
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:DB-PGFC wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:^^ Such am upbeat chappy. Give him a break. His wife just recently left him. liar :^o [-x You need a girlfriend or boyfriend or something . You're too wound up :lol:
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:ricecrackers wrote:DB-PGFC wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:^^ Such am upbeat chappy. Give him a break. His wife just recently left him. liar :^o [-x You need a girlfriend or boyfriend or something . You're too wound up :lol: on contrary, as it appears my mere presence has wound up many here perhaps your own relationship situation requires reevaluation :-({|=
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:ricecrackers wrote:DB-PGFC wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:^^ Such am upbeat chappy. Give him a break. His wife just recently left him. liar :^o [-x You need a girlfriend or boyfriend or something . You're too wound up :lol: on contrary, as it appears my mere presence has wound up many here perhaps your own relationship situation requires reevaluation :-({|= 3edgy5me
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
needs more memes that's standard 442 communication isnt it? who can copy and paste the most reddit memes
Edited by ricecrackers: 8/5/2014 02:33:05 PM
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Now Tone is gonna fuck with the fuel excise. Fuck me dead. -PB
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
lefties should be applauding such a green initiative, but they'll still complain because they're supposed to hate the liberal party
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:lefties should be applauding such a green initiative, but they'll still complain because they're supposed to hate the liberal party Are they doing it as a green measure?
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:needs more memes that's standard 442 communication isnt it? who can copy and paste the most reddit memes
Edited by ricecrackers: 8/5/2014 02:33:05 PM Its the memes and gifs that make this place enjoyable. We need more of them.
|
|
|