Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:Spot on, Mr Laming.
Some of the arguments for banning the burqa are hilariously bad and poorly veiled outbursts of islamophobia. Even on this thread you see people calling pit the burqa as a problem based on speculation of what a minuscule minority of a tiny minority MIGHT be feeling or subject to behind closed doors.
It's populist hogwash and a huge distraction from the fact that both sides of government are systematically destroying our freedoms this week. Congratulations. All of that is all well and good PROVIDED burqa wearing is a free choice. Besides that you should specifically address what you think is wrong with the previous few posts rather that generalise those that think it's a bit "how ya going" are Islamaphobes. (Note I am not claiming it is a security risk.) Fundamentalist types of any religion shit me. From your abortion bombing far right Christian nutjobs to your wannabe Jihadist muslim idiot. Fundamentalists are full blown mental cases that can't be reasoned with, rely on faith to make their decisions and moral judgements and are incapable of logical thought. For me, the burqa, not the lady inside, seems to be representative of a fundamentalist mindset. It may well not be but, like it or not, that's what it looks like. Again I reiterate, the vast majority of the Moslem world wouldn't be seen dead in this getup.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
RedKat wrote:notorganic wrote:Spot on, Mr Laming.
Some of the arguments for banning the burqa are hilariously bad and poorly veiled outbursts of islamophobia. Even on this thread you see people calling pit the burqa as a problem based on speculation of what a minuscule minority of a tiny minority MIGHT be feeling or subject to behind closed doors.
It's populist hogwash and a huge distraction from the fact that both sides of government are systematically destroying our freedoms this week. Congratulations. This completely. Laming said it better than I could. I don't think they need to distract too much re:new ASIO laws, too many people have the opinion "I've got nothing to hide so it doesn't bother me". ](*,)
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
As I said, the burqa isn't worth debating. The vast majority of Australian Muslim women wouldn't be seen dead in this getup.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:RedKat wrote:notorganic wrote:Spot on, Mr Laming.
Some of the arguments for banning the burqa are hilariously bad and poorly veiled outbursts of islamophobia. Even on this thread you see people calling pit the burqa as a problem based on speculation of what a minuscule minority of a tiny minority MIGHT be feeling or subject to behind closed doors.
It's populist hogwash and a huge distraction from the fact that both sides of government are systematically destroying our freedoms this week. Congratulations. This completely. Laming said it better than I could. I don't think they need to distract too much re:new ASIO laws, too many people have the opinion "I've got nothing to hide so it doesn't bother me". ](*,) Which is funny, because they are laws that restrict the freedoms of whistleblowers and journalists, something that Labor tried and failed due to Murdoch and LNP opposition. The ALP don't want to look weak so supported this draconian bullshit. In turn, they look fucking spineless.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:As I said, the burqa isn't worth debating. The vast majority of Australian Muslim women wouldn't be seen dead in this getup. You blokes are a joke. You're happy to hide behind the "it's your right to offend / say whatever you want / freedom of speech is right" bollocks when you're talking about anything else in any other thread but then run a mile when someone says we should talk about whether the burqa should be banned or not. Another case of religion getting a free pass and a free kick. I guarantee you if I walked down Pitt St mall tomorrow naked I'd be arrested in not time at all. Why? Because society, as a collective, decided that that wasn't socially acceptable. But bung a tent on your head and walk about the place, despite Australia having absolutely no history of this sort of gear and despite the fact that quite a few people find it confronting and well, that's OK because thaaaat's religion. Oh right?! Well jog on then. Fucking garbage. Could you walk down the street in full SS Nazi regalia shouting "Sieg Heil"? Could I walk down George St with "C UNT" emblazoned on a T-shirt without being arrested? No I can't because it's deemed socially unacceptable. Society decides what's acceptable not some moral absolute.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Munrubenmuz wrote:notorganic wrote:As I said, the burqa isn't worth debating. The vast majority of Australian Muslim women wouldn't be seen dead in this getup. You blokes are a joke. You're happy to hide behind the "it's your right to offend / say whatever you want / freedom of speech is right" bollocks when you're talking about anything else in any other thread but then run a mile when someone says we should talk about whether the burqa should be banned or not. Another case of religion getting a free pass and a free kick. I guarantee you if I walked down Pitt St mall tomorrow naked I'd be arrested in not time at all. Why? Because society, as a collective, decided that that wasn't socially acceptable. But bung a tent on your head and walk about the place, despite Australia having absolutely no history of this sort of gear and despite the fact that quite a few people find it confronting and well, that's OK because thaaaat's religion. Oh right?! Well jog on then. Fucking garbage. Could you walk down the street in full SS Nazi regalia shouting "Sieg Heil"? Could I walk down George St with "C UNT" emblazoned on a T-shirt without being arrested? No I can't because it's deemed socially unacceptable. Society decides what's acceptable not some moral absolute. Bravo =d>
Love Football
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Munrubenmuz wrote:Could I walk down George St with "C UNT" emblazoned on a T-shirt without being arrested? No I can't because it's deemed socially unacceptable. lol that's fairly standard attire here in Townsville 8-[ o:) -PB
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Munrubenmuz wrote:notorganic wrote:As I said, the burqa isn't worth debating. The vast majority of Australian Muslim women wouldn't be seen dead in this getup. You blokes are a joke. You're happy to hide behind the "it's your right to offend / say whatever you want / freedom of speech is right" bollocks when you're talking about anything else in any other thread but then run a mile when someone says we should talk about whether the burqa should be banned or not. Another case of religion getting a free pass and a free kick. I guarantee you if I walked down Pitt St mall tomorrow naked I'd be arrested in not time at all. Why? Because society, as a collective, decided that that wasn't socially acceptable. But bung a tent on your head and walk about the place, despite Australia having absolutely no history of this sort of gear and despite the fact that quite a few people find it confronting and well, that's OK because thaaaat's religion. Oh right?! Well jog on then. Fucking garbage. Could you walk down the street in full SS Nazi regalia shouting "Sieg Heil"? Could I walk down George St with "C UNT" emblazoned on a T-shirt without being arrested? No I can't because it's deemed socially unacceptable. Society decides what's acceptable not some moral absolute. So you think it's necessary to legislate against it? Some people find tattoos confronting, should we ban them too? If society deems it as unacceptable, it will always be a fringe issue. Edited by mcjules: 2/10/2014 03:36:19 PM
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
Munrubenmuz wrote:notorganic wrote:As I said, the burqa isn't worth debating. The vast majority of Australian Muslim women wouldn't be seen dead in this getup. You blokes are a joke. You're happy to hide behind the "it's your right to offend / say whatever you want / freedom of speech is right" bollocks when you're talking about anything else in any other thread but then run a mile when someone says we should talk about whether the burqa should be banned or not. Another case of religion getting a free pass and a free kick. I guarantee you if I walked down Pitt St mall tomorrow naked I'd be arrested in not time at all. Why? Because society, as a collective, decided that that wasn't socially acceptable. But bung a tent on your head and walk about the place, despite Australia having absolutely no history of this sort of gear and despite the fact that quite a few people find it confronting and well, that's OK because thaaaat's religion. Oh right?! Well jog on then. Fucking garbage. Could you walk down the street in full SS Nazi regalia shouting "Sieg Heil"? Could I walk down George St with "C UNT" emblazoned on a T-shirt without being arrested? No I can't because it's deemed socially unacceptable. Society decides what's acceptable not some moral absolute. Misdirected anger. It's cool mate, we all experience it. Learning to deal with it is extremely gratifying.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:notorganic wrote:As I said, the burqa isn't worth debating. The vast majority of Australian Muslim women wouldn't be seen dead in this getup. You blokes are a joke. You're happy to hide behind the "it's your right to offend / say whatever you want / freedom of speech is right" bollocks when you're talking about anything else in any other thread but then run a mile when someone says we should talk about whether the burqa should be banned or not. Another case of religion getting a free pass and a free kick. I guarantee you if I walked down Pitt St mall tomorrow naked I'd be arrested in not time at all. Why? Because society, as a collective, decided that that wasn't socially acceptable. But bung a tent on your head and walk about the place, despite Australia having absolutely no history of this sort of gear and despite the fact that quite a few people find it confronting and well, that's OK because thaaaat's religion. Oh right?! Well jog on then. Fucking garbage. Could you walk down the street in full SS Nazi regalia shouting "Sieg Heil"? Could I walk down George St with "C UNT" emblazoned on a T-shirt without being arrested? No I can't because it's deemed socially unacceptable. Society decides what's acceptable not some moral absolute. So you think it's necessary to legislate against it? Some people find tattoos confronting, should we ban them too? If society deems it as unacceptable, it will always be a fringe issue. Edited by mcjules: 2/10/2014 03:36:19 PM Want to ban tattoos? Fine, fill your boots. Have the debate. But I bet if you started a discussion in public you wouldn't get shouted down like you do when, heaven forbid, you discuss some ridiculous aspect of a religious observance.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:notorganic wrote:As I said, the burqa isn't worth debating. The vast majority of Australian Muslim women wouldn't be seen dead in this getup. You blokes are a joke. You're happy to hide behind the "it's your right to offend / say whatever you want / freedom of speech is right" bollocks when you're talking about anything else in any other thread but then run a mile when someone says we should talk about whether the burqa should be banned or not. Another case of religion getting a free pass and a free kick. I guarantee you if I walked down Pitt St mall tomorrow naked I'd be arrested in not time at all. Why? Because society, as a collective, decided that that wasn't socially acceptable. But bung a tent on your head and walk about the place, despite Australia having absolutely no history of this sort of gear and despite the fact that quite a few people find it confronting and well, that's OK because thaaaat's religion. Oh right?! Well jog on then. Fucking garbage. Could you walk down the street in full SS Nazi regalia shouting "Sieg Heil"? Could I walk down George St with "C UNT" emblazoned on a T-shirt without being arrested? No I can't because it's deemed socially unacceptable. Society decides what's acceptable not some moral absolute. Misdirected anger. It's cool mate, we all experience it. Learning to deal with it is extremely gratifying. Nice sidestep.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
I can't tell if he's upset by the burqa, or the fact that he perceives being told that his thoughts are pointless as an attack on his freedom of speech.
At the end of the day, any public burqa bans are unconstitutional. It cannot be done without overhauling the religious freedom section of our constitution, which I can guarantee won't end well for secularists.
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Munrubenmuz wrote:mcjules wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:notorganic wrote:As I said, the burqa isn't worth debating. The vast majority of Australian Muslim women wouldn't be seen dead in this getup. You blokes are a joke. You're happy to hide behind the "it's your right to offend / say whatever you want / freedom of speech is right" bollocks when you're talking about anything else in any other thread but then run a mile when someone says we should talk about whether the burqa should be banned or not. Another case of religion getting a free pass and a free kick. I guarantee you if I walked down Pitt St mall tomorrow naked I'd be arrested in not time at all. Why? Because society, as a collective, decided that that wasn't socially acceptable. But bung a tent on your head and walk about the place, despite Australia having absolutely no history of this sort of gear and despite the fact that quite a few people find it confronting and well, that's OK because thaaaat's religion. Oh right?! Well jog on then. Fucking garbage. Could you walk down the street in full SS Nazi regalia shouting "Sieg Heil"? Could I walk down George St with "C UNT" emblazoned on a T-shirt without being arrested? No I can't because it's deemed socially unacceptable. Society decides what's acceptable not some moral absolute. So you think it's necessary to legislate against it? Some people find tattoos confronting, should we ban them too? If society deems it as unacceptable, it will always be a fringe issue. Edited by mcjules: 2/10/2014 03:36:19 PM Want to ban tattoos? Fine, fill your boots. Have the debate. But I bet if you started a discussion in public you wouldn't get shouted down like you do when, heaven forbid, you discuss some ridiculous aspect of a religious observance. Who's stopping you having the debate? If it's that important to you go for it. I actually don't think it's that important an issue, nor do I think it's worthwhile legislating against. If security is the problem, you can legislate in a way that doesn't mean it needs to be banned outright. If oppressing women is the problem, the attire is just a symptom of the problem and banning it won't make a significant difference.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:I can't tell if he's upset by the burqa, or the fact that he perceives being told that his thoughts are pointless as an attack on his freedom of speech. Has to be a bit of both.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
WaMackie
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3K,
Visits: 0
|
The bigger issue is a lot of rights and liberties have been taken away, with legislation introduced in recent weeks.
Australia's true bogan-ness has shone in the last few weeks.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
It's the vibe, it's Mabo.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
damonzzzz wrote:Problem is most people use the 'security' reason for banning the burqa as a cover up of their xenophobia.
Never once I have felt threatened seeing someone in a burqa nor do I ever recall hearing a story of a someone holding up a bank in a burqa. People need to grow up and either realise the burqa is a ridiculous non issue or just admit it's because they are afraid of Islam
Edited by damonzzzz: 1/10/2014 11:39:21 PM Might have to start wearing my motorcycle helmet everywhere. They need to admit that its because they're afraid of motorcycles if they don't like it.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
benelsmore wrote:damonzzzz wrote:Problem is most people use the 'security' reason for banning the burqa as a cover up of their xenophobia.
Never once I have felt threatened seeing someone in a burqa nor do I ever recall hearing a story of a someone holding up a bank in a burqa. People need to grow up and either realise the burqa is a ridiculous non issue or just admit it's because they are afraid of Islam
Edited by damonzzzz: 1/10/2014 11:39:21 PM Might have to start wearing my motorcycle helmet everywhere. They need to admit that its because they're afraid of motorcycles if they don't like it. I guess you missed the recent bikie scares
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
Just gave my local member (ALP) a serve on Facebook for his lack of voice against the ASIO bill this week after he posted this video from Tanya Plibersek. https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=787906947936766&permPage=1
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
And Bill Shorten needs to go.
Spineless fucker.
|
|
|
433
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Bunch of feelgood populist crap. But you are right about Shorten, I'd never vote for him. He comes off as weak and effeminate.
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
If you're gonna be ok with any form of clothing then you should be equally ok with no clothing.
I wanna walk into parliament house naked. If someone is allowed to walk into there with a burqa on, then I should be allowed in there in the nud.
Its my right. Its my religion to get my dick out.
|
|
|
SlyGoat36
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
It's the do gooders that scare me more than anything.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
SlyGoat36 wrote:It's the do gooders that scare me more than anything. Who are they? And how so? -PB
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
don't need to ban the head wear of Muslims,
just do what they do for motorcyclists and place a sign up in security sensitive area's that the head wear must be removed before entry.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
u4486662 wrote:If you're gonna be ok with any form of clothing then you should be equally ok with no clothing.
I wanna walk into parliament house naked. If someone is allowed to walk into there with a burqa on, then I should be allowed in there in the nud.
Its my right. Its my religion to get my dick out. Find a religion where that's a tenant and away you go. (As a bonus, don't pay taxes.)
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Has there been previous occasions where a PM has stepped in to over rule parliament legisltation before? -PB
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:Has there been previous occasions where a PM has stepped in to over rule parliament legisltation before?
-PB details???
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:don't need to ban the head wear of Muslims,
just do what they do for motorcyclists and place a sign up in security sensitive area's that the head wear must be removed before entry.
That's the most sensible way to go, I think the issue is whether that's legal and/or constitutional to legislate. I still don't think it's a big enough deal but it keeps getting oxygen by people that have agendas other than security. If they just got it done, it's one less excuse to use.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:batfink wrote:don't need to ban the head wear of Muslims,
just do what they do for motorcyclists and place a sign up in security sensitive area's that the head wear must be removed before entry.
That's the most sensible way to go, I think the issue is whether that's legal and/or constitutional to legislate. I still don't think it's a big enough deal but it keeps getting oxygen by people that have agendas other than security. If they just got it done, it's one less excuse to use. does it need to be legislated? i can understand for security purposes the removal of head wear and to be honest anyone who whinges about showing their face is just being difficult, any issues about religion or culture sensitivity can be ironed out through management practices........ When my son was in Afghanistan he was involved in an incident where they were attacked by what they thought was a woman with the full kit on, turned out to be a bloke with AK47 and strap on bombs, 3 were seriously injured and my son copped shrapnel to the chest & legs
|
|
|