|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:Glenn - A-league Mad wrote:grazorblade wrote:sky news poll showed convincing win for shorten
was my impression too.
Turnbull didn't look like he believed what he was saying
Turnbull seemed rattled a lot stumbling over his words
Shorten got through a slogan that could be effective "I lead my party, your party leads you"
Shorten turned a negative into a positive on asylum seekers: appearing bipartisan and using Turnbulls words to argue that liberal critiques of labour on this helps the asylum seekers*
Shorten has gone 3 years without a gaffe and stayed solidly on message winning now two debates with a formidable opponent. For better or worse if shorten wins one election he could win 4
*Im not a fan of Shorten's position on this. I'm just commenting on the aesthetics of the debate. Felt like Shorten won it, but I will say this. Even though Malcolm dosnt offer anything when he speaks - he speaks better and more confidently than Bill. Bill always looks like he is reading palm cards in a year 5 history oral exam Bang on. Wish pollies in general would just talk like standard human beings. Shorty is one of the worst for that kind of robotic monotone talking. Is not confidence inducing at all. -PB shorten is incredibly disciplined. 3 years without a gaffe. Not many pollies can do that. Staying a small target for 3 years is tough. If he wins the first election he could probably win a bunch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
BETHFC wrote:grazorblade wrote:probably got ignored because its too much for one post. But it sounds interesting if you break it up a bit It was like 10 lines. It was a response to another post about me making unsubstantiated posts. Oh well. You can't say i didn't at least explain myself :lol: it wasn't long and I appreciated your post. Just came at a bad time :) I will say in general you frustrate me because you flip flop from being reasonable to posting hyperbole. Don't know which one I'm dealing with sometimes :lol:
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:BETHFC wrote:grazorblade wrote:probably got ignored because its too much for one post. But it sounds interesting if you break it up a bit It was like 10 lines. It was a response to another post about me making unsubstantiated posts. Oh well. You can't say i didn't at least explain myself :lol: it wasn't long and I appreciated your post. Just came at a bad time :) I will say in general you frustrate me because you flip flop from being reasonable to posting hyperbole. Don't know which one I'm dealing with sometimes :lol: :lol: Can't go a page without some exaggerations mate. There's a part of me that still suffers the affliction of watching Sky news before work because it actually has news on it, not a panel of idiots discussing Chris Hemsworth going to the bakery in Byron Bay :lol:
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
full disclaimer I'm a little high on hospital drugs for a minor op :D
|
|
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
grazorblade wrote:full disclaimer I'm a little high on hospital drugs for a minor op :D the morphine after my knee op... I fully understand why people get addicted to opiates. :lol:
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
if you want to know how druggies see politics now is the time to ask me haha
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
p.s. one of the warnings they gave me at the hospital was "don't work for today and possibly tomorrow. Don't even answer email because people have been fired sending an email while high after an op"
wonder if they were pulling my leg or legit
|
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
grazorblade wrote:
shorten is incredibly disciplined. 3 years without a gaffe. Not many pollies can do that. Staying a small target for 3 years is tough. If he wins the first election he could probably win a bunch
How do you know he hasn't made a gaffe? Most of the gaffe headlines come from left wing news sources, who are more interested in reporting gaffes than content. Shortens definitely made some gaffes. Does "my view is the prime ministers view" ring a bell?
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:grazorblade wrote:
shorten is incredibly disciplined. 3 years without a gaffe. Not many pollies can do that. Staying a small target for 3 years is tough. If he wins the first election he could probably win a bunch
How do you know he hasn't made a gaffe? Most of the gaffe headlines come from left wing news sources, who are more interested in reporting gaffes than content. Shortens definitely made some gaffes. Does "my view is the prime ministers view" ring a bell? that was four years ago. Hence the discipline for three years line
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
So Greens won't back LNP and Labour won't deal with them in the event of a minor win. Very interested to see what happens if this ends up in a hung parliament. -PB
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Great panel on Q&A tonight, spicy already after the first question. -PB
|
|
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
grazorblade wrote:rusty wrote:grazorblade wrote:
shorten is incredibly disciplined. 3 years without a gaffe. Not many pollies can do that. Staying a small target for 3 years is tough. If he wins the first election he could probably win a bunch
How do you know he hasn't made a gaffe? Most of the gaffe headlines come from left wing news sources, who are more interested in reporting gaffes than content. Shortens definitely made some gaffes. Does "my view is the prime ministers view" ring a bell? that was four years ago. Hence the discipline for three years line Even a high, grazorblade can take down rusty =d>
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Xenophon and Di Natale are both well spoken and very quick off the mark in response. -PB
|
|
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:Xenophon and Di Natale are both well spoken and very quick off the mark in response.
-PB Terri Butler wasn't a great choice for Labor but neither is Steve Ciobo :oops:
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:Xenophon and Di Natale are both well spoken and very quick off the mark in response.
-PB Terri Butler wasn't a great choice for Labor but neither is Steve Ciobo :oops: Yeah don't rate Terri at all lol. She hasn't come across very strongly, likes to throw out claims but then doesn't like it when she's counter claimed from one of the independents or Di Natale. -PB
|
|
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
I love playing spot the young liberals on QandA :lol:
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Di Natale is a naive tool.
|
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:I love playing spot the young liberals on QandA :lol: The aggressive, loaded question that Senates should pass all policy? Nah couldn't tell :lol:
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
that girl on the far left (I'm guessing she was labour)
was like a female paul keating. Should would be an entertaining primeminister if she got there one day
|
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:mcjules wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:Xenophon and Di Natale are both well spoken and very quick off the mark in response.
-PB Terri Butler wasn't a great choice for Labor but neither is Steve Ciobo :oops: Yeah don't rate Terri at all lol. She hasn't come across very strongly, likes to throw out claims but then doesn't like it when she's counter claimed from one of the independents or Di Natale. -PB I actually liked her. She was abrupt & wasn't your typical pollie from the Woolies/Coles (TM) alliance towing the party line.
|
|
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:mcjules wrote:I love playing spot the young liberals on QandA :lol: The aggressive, loaded question that Senates should pass all policy? Nah couldn't tell :lol: Ding ding ding, we have a winner. :lol: Bonus points if you picked the dude asking about slashing penalty rates. Both of them had that shit eating grin.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:mcjules wrote:I love playing spot the young liberals on QandA :lol: The aggressive, loaded question that Senates should pass all policy? Nah couldn't tell :lol: Ding ding ding, we have a winner. :lol: Bonus points if you picked the dude asking about slashing penalty rates. Both of them had that shit eating grin. Yeah, but at least he could have a laugh that he got sprung The Senate question one you could see becoming an angry old white male. The type that would end up abusing indigenous Australians... Edited by Murdoch Rags Ltd: 31/5/2016 12:05:14 AM
|
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
I don't watch qanda as its just so biased but it's good to hear a few strong young liberals were in the audience giving it a crack.
|
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
I just hope they didn't get spat on and/or bashed for being liberals. Perhaps Zaki Mallah was in the crowd to keep an eye on them.
|
|
|
|
|
SocaWho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.3K,
Visits: 0
|
does Murdoch Rags = Roz Ward:-k
Methinks so
|
|
|
|
|
GDeathe
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K,
Visits: 0
|
double post
Edited by GDeathe: 31/5/2016 05:51:21 AM
|
|
|
|
|
GDeathe
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K,
Visits: 0
|
where is the moral ourage machine about the blatent corruption of the ALP giving a media corporation with a billion a year budget an extra 21 million for more favorable coverage under the guise of "womens sport"
Edited by GDeathe: 31/5/2016 05:51:52 AM
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:mcjules wrote:I love playing spot the young liberals on QandA :lol: The aggressive, loaded question that Senates should pass all policy? Nah couldn't tell :lol: Ding ding ding, we have a winner. :lol: Bonus points if you picked the dude asking about slashing penalty rates. Both of them had that shit eating grin. The one Do Natale came back with the Joy comment? :lol: -PB
|
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
SocaWho wrote:What does Murdoch Rags contribute to 442 from a football fan angle?:-k
If he likes football he should suck Sepp Blatters cock...since it would be the closest to politics he would get to football
Edited by Socawho: 30/5/2016 04:18:29 PM Being hit by a school bus is the closest you'll get to being educated
|
|
|
|