|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xAs someone whom in normal life attempts to live one windup at a time, I freaking love watching Milo do his thing. He openly admits he is hated by the right and hated by the left and that's exactly where he wants to be, and I applaud him for that. I loved his interview with Channel 10 when Jessica Rowe couldn't actually debate anything of significance/relevance, and what I loved most about it is that there are people in existence whom watched that and don't think Rowe was absolutely destroyed in debate, which just further feeds Milo for future. Milo's "stats" of people whom believe there is gender inequality vs people whom identify as feminist is overwhelmingly and surprisingly massive in gap between the two, and it's hard to argue against a large amount of his points on the subject when you keep that in mind. I will happily grab my bowl of cereal and watch on for the years to come of the Milo show, it is just so damn fascinating. I like to think I attempt to live life pointing out hypocrisy in my own but also everyone elses lives, and Milo in his entirety is about that. Far out, what a time to be alive. I also saw that Vicpol intends to bill him for having to provide police support. I disagree with this as it would set a precedent for all controversial public speakers. If it succeeds, all the ANTIFA criminals would have to do would be what they always do and show up and cause violence. This shitstorm over Milo has shown just how ugly Australia can be, disappointing given the success of the SSM bill. I read that was happening too. But wherever I read it said it's standard practice to bill this kind of thing direct to the person, so it sounds as if the precedent is already set well before Milo. I didn't investiage any further though. I thought that related to sports events and the like and not so much political speakers? I'd imagine it would cover hosting an event (irrelevant if sport or otherwise) If anyone does have the answer for BETH and I, I'm very interested. I am also curious because this could be used to kill certain controversial events. For example, if Milo came back, his opponents could simply make a heap of protest pages and broadcast publicly and it would probably make the event uneconomical to host.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sokorny
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xLooks like the knives are out for Turnbull, Abbott and the LNP this morning, following their successful SSM policy. Can you imagine if Shorten and Labor has suggested the plebiscite, the gay community would probably hold a ticker tape parade and erect a statue in his honour. It was encouraging to see that none of the proposed "concessions" were accepted by either house of parliament. I think we should be looking to celebrate that a discriminatory law has now been removed, rather than trying to "bait" people (yes the 'dickhead-radar' is well and truly locked onto you rusty ... nowadays we are a bit more PC though and call those comments trolling ... I still prefer dickhead!). We are far more PC these days look at the Milo protests in the PC capital of Australia (Melbourne). I think most people concerned about the law outside of religious fundamentalists and dickhead homophobes were only ever concerned about protecting certain institutions like churches. The amendments proposed to the Bill had nothing to do with churches. They were focused on civil celebrants and businesses. Religious institutions already have exemptions in the Marriage Act and Racial Discrimination Act, and the proposed Bill did not remove any of those. In regards to the protests ... it always takes two tango, and there are also "professional" protesters / anarchists who attend these events with little to no interest in the actual concept of the protest (or counter-protest). Their whole aim is to start trouble, bit like lighting a fuse (on either side and watch the whole thing explode). This is a reason I won't attend any of these sort of protests because people will use the situation for their own agenda to cause trouble ("double agents" aren't unheard of in this situations either).
|
|
|
|
|
sokorny
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAs someone whom in normal life attempts to live one windup at a time, I freaking love watching Milo do his thing. He openly admits he is hated by the right and hated by the left and that's exactly where he wants to be, and I applaud him for that. I loved his interview with Channel 10 when Jessica Rowe couldn't actually debate anything of significance/relevance, and what I loved most about it is that there are people in existence whom watched that and don't think Rowe was absolutely destroyed in debate, which just further feeds Milo for future. Milo's "stats" of people whom believe there is gender inequality vs people whom identify as feminist is overwhelmingly and surprisingly massive in gap between the two, and it's hard to argue against a large amount of his points on the subject when you keep that in mind. I will happily grab my bowl of cereal and watch on for the years to come of the Milo show, it is just so damn fascinating. I like to think I attempt to live life pointing out hypocrisy in my own but also everyone elses lives, and Milo in his entirety is about that. Far out, what a time to be alive. I also saw that Vicpol intends to bill him for having to provide police support. I disagree with this as it would set a precedent for all controversial public speakers. If it succeeds, all the ANTIFA criminals would have to do would be what they always do and show up and cause violence. This shitstorm over Milo has shown just how ugly Australia can be, disappointing given the success of the SSM bill. I read that was happening too. But wherever I read it said it's standard practice to bill this kind of thing direct to the person, so it sounds as if the precedent is already set well before Milo. I didn't investiage any further though. I thought that related to sports events and the like and not so much political speakers? I'd imagine it would cover hosting an event (irrelevant if sport or otherwise) If anyone does have the answer for BETH and I, I'm very interested. I am also curious because this could be used to kill certain controversial events. For example, if Milo came back, his opponents could simply make a heap of protest pages and broadcast publicly and it would probably make the event uneconomical to host. Going off the lines being said by the Police Minister there is a contract usually between commercial events and police. So it could come down to what is in the contract. “There is for lots of events where there is an agreement with Victoria police around the cost and cost-sharing arrangement. Police do some community based events which are not-for-profit, but for these sort of rallies and also for the AFL and those big events there is an agreement around the cost.”
|
|
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xLooks like the knives are out for Turnbull, Abbott and the LNP this morning, following their successful SSM policy. Can you imagine if Shorten and Labor has suggested the plebiscite, the gay community would probably hold a ticker tape parade and erect a statue in his honour. It was encouraging to see that none of the proposed "concessions" were accepted by either house of parliament. I think we should be looking to celebrate that a discriminatory law has now been removed, rather than trying to "bait" people (yes the 'dickhead-radar' is well and truly locked onto you rusty ... nowadays we are a bit more PC though and call those comments trolling ... I still prefer dickhead!). We are far more PC these days look at the Milo protests in the PC capital of Australia (Melbourne). I think most people concerned about the law outside of religious fundamentalists and dickhead homophobes were only ever concerned about protecting certain institutions like churches. The amendments proposed to the Bill had nothing to do with churches. They were focused on civil celebrants and businesses. Religious institutions already have exemptions in the Marriage Act and Racial Discrimination Act, and the proposed Bill did not remove any of those. In regards to the protests ... it always takes two tango, and there are also "professional" protesters / anarchists who attend these events with little to no interest in the actual concept of the protest (or counter-protest). Their whole aim is to start trouble, bit like lighting a fuse (on either side and watch the whole thing explode). This is a reason I won't attend any of these sort of protests because people will use the situation for their own agenda to cause trouble ("double agents" aren't unheard of in this situations either). The ABC news has an article up on its social media page about a gay bishop trying to lobby the church to change its definition of marriage to be in line with the law. This sort of thing was expected to happen. I can't say I really care but it is interesting to see these sorts of issues come up after being told throughout the plebiscite that these concerns were completely unfounded.
|
|
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAs someone whom in normal life attempts to live one windup at a time, I freaking love watching Milo do his thing. He openly admits he is hated by the right and hated by the left and that's exactly where he wants to be, and I applaud him for that. I loved his interview with Channel 10 when Jessica Rowe couldn't actually debate anything of significance/relevance, and what I loved most about it is that there are people in existence whom watched that and don't think Rowe was absolutely destroyed in debate, which just further feeds Milo for future. Milo's "stats" of people whom believe there is gender inequality vs people whom identify as feminist is overwhelmingly and surprisingly massive in gap between the two, and it's hard to argue against a large amount of his points on the subject when you keep that in mind. I will happily grab my bowl of cereal and watch on for the years to come of the Milo show, it is just so damn fascinating. I like to think I attempt to live life pointing out hypocrisy in my own but also everyone elses lives, and Milo in his entirety is about that. Far out, what a time to be alive. I also saw that Vicpol intends to bill him for having to provide police support. I disagree with this as it would set a precedent for all controversial public speakers. If it succeeds, all the ANTIFA criminals would have to do would be what they always do and show up and cause violence. This shitstorm over Milo has shown just how ugly Australia can be, disappointing given the success of the SSM bill. I read that was happening too. But wherever I read it said it's standard practice to bill this kind of thing direct to the person, so it sounds as if the precedent is already set well before Milo. I didn't investiage any further though. I thought that related to sports events and the like and not so much political speakers? I'd imagine it would cover hosting an event (irrelevant if sport or otherwise) If anyone does have the answer for BETH and I, I'm very interested. I am also curious because this could be used to kill certain controversial events. For example, if Milo came back, his opponents could simply make a heap of protest pages and broadcast publicly and it would probably make the event uneconomical to host. Going off the lines being said by the Police Minister there is a contract usually between commercial events and police. So it could come down to what is in the contract. “There is for lots of events where there is an agreement with Victoria police around the cost and cost-sharing arrangement. Police do some community based events which are not-for-profit, but for these sort of rallies and also for the AFL and those big events there is an agreement around the cost.” Which, given the issues with the Melbourne ANTIFA and socialists, will likely see any future contracts for right-wing events increase substantially. Either way, the intolerant PC brigade wins.
|
|
|
|
|
sokorny
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAs someone whom in normal life attempts to live one windup at a time, I freaking love watching Milo do his thing. He openly admits he is hated by the right and hated by the left and that's exactly where he wants to be, and I applaud him for that. I loved his interview with Channel 10 when Jessica Rowe couldn't actually debate anything of significance/relevance, and what I loved most about it is that there are people in existence whom watched that and don't think Rowe was absolutely destroyed in debate, which just further feeds Milo for future. Milo's "stats" of people whom believe there is gender inequality vs people whom identify as feminist is overwhelmingly and surprisingly massive in gap between the two, and it's hard to argue against a large amount of his points on the subject when you keep that in mind. I will happily grab my bowl of cereal and watch on for the years to come of the Milo show, it is just so damn fascinating. I like to think I attempt to live life pointing out hypocrisy in my own but also everyone elses lives, and Milo in his entirety is about that. Far out, what a time to be alive. I also saw that Vicpol intends to bill him for having to provide police support. I disagree with this as it would set a precedent for all controversial public speakers. If it succeeds, all the ANTIFA criminals would have to do would be what they always do and show up and cause violence. This shitstorm over Milo has shown just how ugly Australia can be, disappointing given the success of the SSM bill. I read that was happening too. But wherever I read it said it's standard practice to bill this kind of thing direct to the person, so it sounds as if the precedent is already set well before Milo. I didn't investiage any further though. I thought that related to sports events and the like and not so much political speakers? I'd imagine it would cover hosting an event (irrelevant if sport or otherwise) If anyone does have the answer for BETH and I, I'm very interested. I am also curious because this could be used to kill certain controversial events. For example, if Milo came back, his opponents could simply make a heap of protest pages and broadcast publicly and it would probably make the event uneconomical to host. Going off the lines being said by the Police Minister there is a contract usually between commercial events and police. So it could come down to what is in the contract. “There is for lots of events where there is an agreement with Victoria police around the cost and cost-sharing arrangement. Police do some community based events which are not-for-profit, but for these sort of rallies and also for the AFL and those big events there is an agreement around the cost.” Which, given the issues with the Melbourne ANTIFA and socialists, will likely see any future contracts for right-wing events increase substantially. Either way, the intolerant PC brigade wins. I don't think we should be tolerant of hatred ... do you?
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xLooks like the knives are out for Turnbull, Abbott and the LNP this morning, following their successful SSM policy. Can you imagine if Shorten and Labor has suggested the plebiscite, the gay community would probably hold a ticker tape parade and erect a statue in his honour. It was encouraging to see that none of the proposed "concessions" were accepted by either house of parliament. I think we should be looking to celebrate that a discriminatory law has now been removed, rather than trying to "bait" people (yes the 'dickhead-radar' is well and truly locked onto you rusty ... nowadays we are a bit more PC though and call those comments trolling ... I still prefer dickhead!). We are far more PC these days look at the Milo protests in the PC capital of Australia (Melbourne). I think most people concerned about the law outside of religious fundamentalists and dickhead homophobes were only ever concerned about protecting certain institutions like churches. Not all PC stuff is bad you know. Surely you think that the world's a better place now that people aren't called 'coons' or 'boongs' or 'niggers'. These are all examples of 'political correctness'. Try to be honest when you explain to us why you think it's OK to still use these terms (and dozens of others) because, presumably, a vehement anti-PC crusader like yourself, must think it's OK?
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xLooks like the knives are out for Turnbull, Abbott and the LNP this morning, following their successful SSM policy. Can you imagine if Shorten and Labor has suggested the plebiscite, the gay community would probably hold a ticker tape parade and erect a statue in his honour. It was encouraging to see that none of the proposed "concessions" were accepted by either house of parliament. I think we should be looking to celebrate that a discriminatory law has now been removed, rather than trying to "bait" people (yes the 'dickhead-radar' is well and truly locked onto you rusty ... nowadays we are a bit more PC though and call those comments trolling ... I still prefer dickhead!). We are far more PC these days look at the Milo protests in the PC capital of Australia (Melbourne). I think most people concerned about the law outside of religious fundamentalists and dickhead homophobes were only ever concerned about protecting certain institutions like churches. Not all PC stuff is bad you know. Surely you think that the world's a better place now that people aren't called 'coons' or 'boongs' or 'niggers'. These are all examples of 'political correctness'. Try to be honest when you explain to us why you think it's OK to still use these terms (and dozens of others) because, presumably, a vehement anti-PC crusader like yourself, must think it's OK? That's not what I said at all. I said we are FAR more PC these days which is a simple observation. What's with the paraphrasing? Rather uncalled for? I don't know why you're so abusive towards me, its rather unfair and constitutes bullying. If I really cared I could cite at least 10 examples where instead of disagreeing with me you have made abusive statements in this thread alone. I tend not to have an issue with anyone on these boards but my view is that you go out of your way to be unkind towards me. This is the last time I will ask. Of course not all PC is bad, but labelling right-wing people as Nazis just because is pretty bad. Denigrating right-wing people as unintelligent or left wing people as unwashed ferals is quite easy to find on social media and is also not acceptable. I refer negatively towards PC when thinking about a trip to Melbourne where uni-students were trying to gather signatures to remove Pauline Hanson from parliament.
|
|
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAs someone whom in normal life attempts to live one windup at a time, I freaking love watching Milo do his thing. He openly admits he is hated by the right and hated by the left and that's exactly where he wants to be, and I applaud him for that. I loved his interview with Channel 10 when Jessica Rowe couldn't actually debate anything of significance/relevance, and what I loved most about it is that there are people in existence whom watched that and don't think Rowe was absolutely destroyed in debate, which just further feeds Milo for future. Milo's "stats" of people whom believe there is gender inequality vs people whom identify as feminist is overwhelmingly and surprisingly massive in gap between the two, and it's hard to argue against a large amount of his points on the subject when you keep that in mind. I will happily grab my bowl of cereal and watch on for the years to come of the Milo show, it is just so damn fascinating. I like to think I attempt to live life pointing out hypocrisy in my own but also everyone elses lives, and Milo in his entirety is about that. Far out, what a time to be alive. I also saw that Vicpol intends to bill him for having to provide police support. I disagree with this as it would set a precedent for all controversial public speakers. If it succeeds, all the ANTIFA criminals would have to do would be what they always do and show up and cause violence. This shitstorm over Milo has shown just how ugly Australia can be, disappointing given the success of the SSM bill. I read that was happening too. But wherever I read it said it's standard practice to bill this kind of thing direct to the person, so it sounds as if the precedent is already set well before Milo. I didn't investiage any further though. I thought that related to sports events and the like and not so much political speakers? I'd imagine it would cover hosting an event (irrelevant if sport or otherwise) If anyone does have the answer for BETH and I, I'm very interested. I am also curious because this could be used to kill certain controversial events. For example, if Milo came back, his opponents could simply make a heap of protest pages and broadcast publicly and it would probably make the event uneconomical to host. Going off the lines being said by the Police Minister there is a contract usually between commercial events and police. So it could come down to what is in the contract. “There is for lots of events where there is an agreement with Victoria police around the cost and cost-sharing arrangement. Police do some community based events which are not-for-profit, but for these sort of rallies and also for the AFL and those big events there is an agreement around the cost.” Which, given the issues with the Melbourne ANTIFA and socialists, will likely see any future contracts for right-wing events increase substantially. Either way, the intolerant PC brigade wins. I don't think we should be tolerant of hatred ... do you? I can't say that I have a comprehensive knowledge of Milo's arguments and several obviously horrendous controversies aside, I can't say that I would agree with the use of hatred. He has definitely crossed into that realm a couple of times. I feel its a tactic to remain relevant, like a shock jock. I'd be curious to listen to what Milo said in Australia and whether or not any of it was actually hate speech? As for hatred itself from actual white supremacists and Islamic preachers etc. etc, of course we shouldn't. I don't know where the line between freedom of speech (being critical of a group of people using evidence and facts) and hate speech is anymore. In saying that, under the guise of moral superiority, you could easily argue that the protestors the other day were not much better yelling abuse at people.
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xLooks like the knives are out for Turnbull, Abbott and the LNP this morning, following their successful SSM policy. Can you imagine if Shorten and Labor has suggested the plebiscite, the gay community would probably hold a ticker tape parade and erect a statue in his honour. It was encouraging to see that none of the proposed "concessions" were accepted by either house of parliament. I think we should be looking to celebrate that a discriminatory law has now been removed, rather than trying to "bait" people (yes the 'dickhead-radar' is well and truly locked onto you rusty ... nowadays we are a bit more PC though and call those comments trolling ... I still prefer dickhead!). We are far more PC these days look at the Milo protests in the PC capital of Australia (Melbourne). I think most people concerned about the law outside of religious fundamentalists and dickhead homophobes were only ever concerned about protecting certain institutions like churches. Not all PC stuff is bad you know. Surely you think that the world's a better place now that people aren't called 'coons' or 'boongs' or 'niggers'. These are all examples of 'political correctness'. Try to be honest when you explain to us why you think it's OK to still use these terms (and dozens of others) because, presumably, a vehement anti-PC crusader like yourself, must think it's OK? That's not what I said at all. I said we are FAR more PC these days which is a simple observation. What's with the paraphrasing? Rather uncalled for? I don't know why you're so abusive towards me, its rather unfair and constitutes bullying. If I really cared I could cite at least 10 examples where instead of disagreeing with me you have made abusive statements in this thread alone. I tend not to have an issue with anyone on these boards but my view is that you go out of your way to be unkind towards me. This is the last time I will ask. Of course not all PC is bad, but labelling right-wing people as Nazis just because is pretty bad. Denigrating right-wing people as unintelligent or left wing people as unwashed ferals is quite easy to find on social media and is also not acceptable. I refer negatively towards PC when thinking about a trip to Melbourne where uni-students were trying to gather signatures to remove Pauline Hanson from parliament. Who's being abusive? I'm asking you a direct question. You're the one always banging on about it. If you think those words are bad but others are OK can't you see that that's a subjective judgement. And as it's a 'subjective' judgment your opinion is no more correct than anyone else's. ' Of course not all PC is bad' Good , we're agreed then. And what's this? ' its rather unfair and constitutes bullying'. FMD, give yourself a dozen. For such a vociferous proponent of free speech you sure have a thin skin.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xLooks like the knives are out for Turnbull, Abbott and the LNP this morning, following their successful SSM policy. Can you imagine if Shorten and Labor has suggested the plebiscite, the gay community would probably hold a ticker tape parade and erect a statue in his honour. It was encouraging to see that none of the proposed "concessions" were accepted by either house of parliament. I think we should be looking to celebrate that a discriminatory law has now been removed, rather than trying to "bait" people (yes the 'dickhead-radar' is well and truly locked onto you rusty ... nowadays we are a bit more PC though and call those comments trolling ... I still prefer dickhead!). We are far more PC these days look at the Milo protests in the PC capital of Australia (Melbourne). I think most people concerned about the law outside of religious fundamentalists and dickhead homophobes were only ever concerned about protecting certain institutions like churches. Not all PC stuff is bad you know. Surely you think that the world's a better place now that people aren't called 'coons' or 'boongs' or 'niggers'. These are all examples of 'political correctness'. Try to be honest when you explain to us why you think it's OK to still use these terms (and dozens of others) because, presumably, a vehement anti-PC crusader like yourself, must think it's OK? That's not what I said at all. I said we are FAR more PC these days which is a simple observation. What's with the paraphrasing? Rather uncalled for? I don't know why you're so abusive towards me, its rather unfair and constitutes bullying. If I really cared I could cite at least 10 examples where instead of disagreeing with me you have made abusive statements in this thread alone. I tend not to have an issue with anyone on these boards but my view is that you go out of your way to be unkind towards me. This is the last time I will ask. Of course not all PC is bad, but labelling right-wing people as Nazis just because is pretty bad. Denigrating right-wing people as unintelligent or left wing people as unwashed ferals is quite easy to find on social media and is also not acceptable. I refer negatively towards PC when thinking about a trip to Melbourne where uni-students were trying to gather signatures to remove Pauline Hanson from parliament. Who's being abusive? I'm asking you a direct question. You're the one always banging on about it. If you think those words are bad but others are OK can't you see that that's a subjective judgement. And as it's a 'subjective' judgment your opinion is no more correct than anyone else's. ' Of course not all PC is bad' Good , we're agreed then. And what's this? ' its rather unfair and constitutes bullying'. FMD, give yourself a dozen. For such a vociferous proponent of free speech you sure have a thin skin. You asked me to justify calling someone a N***** assuming that i'm ok with racial villification. How can you not see that this kind of paraphrasing is not on? I take issue with your constant need to paraphrase what I say into something it is not. There is no reasonable way for you to take my statement that we are 'Far more PC today' as me supporting racial vilification. This is clearly a personal issue. You clearly have a problem with my contributions to this forum and have had for a long time, before you changed your username. I don't know what your problem is but everyone else seems to be easy to discuss things with on this forum, except you. Either PM me to sort it out or ignore me I really don't care either way. Free speech doesn't cover bullying and constantly jumping on someone no matter what they post. It's a consistent trend with you and I have no idea why.
|
|
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
In other news its rather sad to see both Turnbull and Shorten championing their contribution to passing SSM. Both at some point and time have opposed it. Both have changed their tune when it suited their popularity. It's hard to applaud them for bowing to pressure to make this happen.
The only party to consistently support SSM from inception to law and without bowing to popularity has been the Greens who should be taking credit for making this happen.
|
|
|
|
|
Davide82
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xLooks like the knives are out for Turnbull, Abbott and the LNP this morning, following their successful SSM policy. Can you imagine if Shorten and Labor has suggested the plebiscite, the gay community would probably hold a ticker tape parade and erect a statue in his honour. It was encouraging to see that none of the proposed "concessions" were accepted by either house of parliament. I think we should be looking to celebrate that a discriminatory law has now been removed, rather than trying to "bait" people (yes the 'dickhead-radar' is well and truly locked onto you rusty ... nowadays we are a bit more PC though and call those comments trolling ... I still prefer dickhead!). We are far more PC these days look at the Milo protests in the PC capital of Australia (Melbourne). I think most people concerned about the law outside of religious fundamentalists and dickhead homophobes were only ever concerned about protecting certain institutions like churches. Not all PC stuff is bad you know. Surely you think that the world's a better place now that people aren't called 'coons' or 'boongs' or 'niggers'. These are all examples of 'political correctness'. Try to be honest when you explain to us why you think it's OK to still use these terms (and dozens of others) because, presumably, a vehement anti-PC crusader like yourself, must think it's OK? I don't know why you're so abusive towards me, its rather unfair and constitutes bullying. If I really cared I could cite at least 10 examples where instead of disagreeing with me you have made abusive statements in this thread alone. I tend not to have an issue with anyone on these boards but my view is that you go out of your way to be unkind towards me. This is the last time I will ask. HO LY SHiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiT How do you seriously manage to justify statements like this with all your anti snowlflake/safe space shit talking?
|
|
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xLooks like the knives are out for Turnbull, Abbott and the LNP this morning, following their successful SSM policy. Can you imagine if Shorten and Labor has suggested the plebiscite, the gay community would probably hold a ticker tape parade and erect a statue in his honour. It was encouraging to see that none of the proposed "concessions" were accepted by either house of parliament. I think we should be looking to celebrate that a discriminatory law has now been removed, rather than trying to "bait" people (yes the 'dickhead-radar' is well and truly locked onto you rusty ... nowadays we are a bit more PC though and call those comments trolling ... I still prefer dickhead!). We are far more PC these days look at the Milo protests in the PC capital of Australia (Melbourne). I think most people concerned about the law outside of religious fundamentalists and dickhead homophobes were only ever concerned about protecting certain institutions like churches. Not all PC stuff is bad you know. Surely you think that the world's a better place now that people aren't called 'coons' or 'boongs' or 'niggers'. These are all examples of 'political correctness'. Try to be honest when you explain to us why you think it's OK to still use these terms (and dozens of others) because, presumably, a vehement anti-PC crusader like yourself, must think it's OK? I don't know why you're so abusive towards me, its rather unfair and constitutes bullying. If I really cared I could cite at least 10 examples where instead of disagreeing with me you have made abusive statements in this thread alone. I tend not to have an issue with anyone on these boards but my view is that you go out of your way to be unkind towards me. This is the last time I will ask. HO LY SHiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiT How do you seriously manage to justify statements like this with all your anti snowlflake/safe space shit talking? This bloke paraphrases every post I make chief and has done for a long time. Did you read the thread all the way up?
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xLooks like the knives are out for Turnbull, Abbott and the LNP this morning, following their successful SSM policy. Can you imagine if Shorten and Labor has suggested the plebiscite, the gay community would probably hold a ticker tape parade and erect a statue in his honour. It was encouraging to see that none of the proposed "concessions" were accepted by either house of parliament. I think we should be looking to celebrate that a discriminatory law has now been removed, rather than trying to "bait" people (yes the 'dickhead-radar' is well and truly locked onto you rusty ... nowadays we are a bit more PC though and call those comments trolling ... I still prefer dickhead!). We are far more PC these days look at the Milo protests in the PC capital of Australia (Melbourne). I think most people concerned about the law outside of religious fundamentalists and dickhead homophobes were only ever concerned about protecting certain institutions like churches. Not all PC stuff is bad you know. Surely you think that the world's a better place now that people aren't called 'coons' or 'boongs' or 'niggers'. These are all examples of 'political correctness'. Try to be honest when you explain to us why you think it's OK to still use these terms (and dozens of others) because, presumably, a vehement anti-PC crusader like yourself, must think it's OK? I don't know why you're so abusive towards me, its rather unfair and constitutes bullying. If I really cared I could cite at least 10 examples where instead of disagreeing with me you have made abusive statements in this thread alone. I tend not to have an issue with anyone on these boards but my view is that you go out of your way to be unkind towards me. This is the last time I will ask. HO LY SHiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiT How do you seriously manage to justify statements like this with all your anti snowlflake/safe space shit talking? This bloke paraphrases every post I make chief and has done for a long time. Did you read the thread all the way up? Yeah just did a reread of the last few pages (edit: last 10 pages actually) and can't find anywhere where you think I'm 'bullying you'. The problem for you is you've been hoisted by one's own petard. And what Davide said. Surely you're joking.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
sokorny
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAs someone whom in normal life attempts to live one windup at a time, I freaking love watching Milo do his thing. He openly admits he is hated by the right and hated by the left and that's exactly where he wants to be, and I applaud him for that. I loved his interview with Channel 10 when Jessica Rowe couldn't actually debate anything of significance/relevance, and what I loved most about it is that there are people in existence whom watched that and don't think Rowe was absolutely destroyed in debate, which just further feeds Milo for future. Milo's "stats" of people whom believe there is gender inequality vs people whom identify as feminist is overwhelmingly and surprisingly massive in gap between the two, and it's hard to argue against a large amount of his points on the subject when you keep that in mind. I will happily grab my bowl of cereal and watch on for the years to come of the Milo show, it is just so damn fascinating. I like to think I attempt to live life pointing out hypocrisy in my own but also everyone elses lives, and Milo in his entirety is about that. Far out, what a time to be alive. I also saw that Vicpol intends to bill him for having to provide police support. I disagree with this as it would set a precedent for all controversial public speakers. If it succeeds, all the ANTIFA criminals would have to do would be what they always do and show up and cause violence. This shitstorm over Milo has shown just how ugly Australia can be, disappointing given the success of the SSM bill. I read that was happening too. But wherever I read it said it's standard practice to bill this kind of thing direct to the person, so it sounds as if the precedent is already set well before Milo. I didn't investiage any further though. I thought that related to sports events and the like and not so much political speakers? I'd imagine it would cover hosting an event (irrelevant if sport or otherwise) If anyone does have the answer for BETH and I, I'm very interested. I am also curious because this could be used to kill certain controversial events. For example, if Milo came back, his opponents could simply make a heap of protest pages and broadcast publicly and it would probably make the event uneconomical to host. Going off the lines being said by the Police Minister there is a contract usually between commercial events and police. So it could come down to what is in the contract. “There is for lots of events where there is an agreement with Victoria police around the cost and cost-sharing arrangement. Police do some community based events which are not-for-profit, but for these sort of rallies and also for the AFL and those big events there is an agreement around the cost.” Which, given the issues with the Melbourne ANTIFA and socialists, will likely see any future contracts for right-wing events increase substantially. Either way, the intolerant PC brigade wins. I don't think we should be tolerant of hatred ... do you? I can't say that I have a comprehensive knowledge of Milo's arguments and several obviously horrendous controversies aside, I can't say that I would agree with the use of hatred. He has definitely crossed into that realm a couple of times. I feel its a tactic to remain relevant, like a shock jock. I'd be curious to listen to what Milo said in Australia and whether or not any of it was actually hate speech? As for hatred itself from actual white supremacists and Islamic preachers etc. etc, of course we shouldn't. I don't know where the line between freedom of speech (being critical of a group of people using evidence and facts) and hate speech is anymore. In saying that, under the guise of moral superiority, you could easily argue that the protestors the other day were not much better yelling abuse at people. Agree ... why I said I don't support those sort of protests either. Both are as bad as each other.
|
|
|
|
|
sokorny
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+xIn other news its rather sad to see both Turnbull and Shorten championing their contribution to passing SSM. Both at some point and time have opposed it. Both have changed their tune when it suited their popularity. It's hard to applaud them for bowing to pressure to make this happen. The only party to consistently support SSM from inception to law and without bowing to popularity has been the Greens who should be taking credit for making this happen. I think the Australian Democrats always championed it too ... considering they disappeared how many years ago?? shows how long the argue has been in parliament (with numerous bills having being introduced but never passing) How many abstained?? It said 4 said NO, but didn't mention other numbers as if NO under 5 no official count is undertaken. I wonder how my local MP voted, she originally said NO in the local rags but after a strong YES response in the public vote she said she would change hers to a YES vote too.
|
|
|
|
|
Davide82
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xLooks like the knives are out for Turnbull, Abbott and the LNP this morning, following their successful SSM policy. Can you imagine if Shorten and Labor has suggested the plebiscite, the gay community would probably hold a ticker tape parade and erect a statue in his honour. It was encouraging to see that none of the proposed "concessions" were accepted by either house of parliament. I think we should be looking to celebrate that a discriminatory law has now been removed, rather than trying to "bait" people (yes the 'dickhead-radar' is well and truly locked onto you rusty ... nowadays we are a bit more PC though and call those comments trolling ... I still prefer dickhead!). We are far more PC these days look at the Milo protests in the PC capital of Australia (Melbourne). I think most people concerned about the law outside of religious fundamentalists and dickhead homophobes were only ever concerned about protecting certain institutions like churches. Not all PC stuff is bad you know. Surely you think that the world's a better place now that people aren't called 'coons' or 'boongs' or 'niggers'. These are all examples of 'political correctness'. Try to be honest when you explain to us why you think it's OK to still use these terms (and dozens of others) because, presumably, a vehement anti-PC crusader like yourself, must think it's OK? I don't know why you're so abusive towards me, its rather unfair and constitutes bullying. If I really cared I could cite at least 10 examples where instead of disagreeing with me you have made abusive statements in this thread alone. I tend not to have an issue with anyone on these boards but my view is that you go out of your way to be unkind towards me. This is the last time I will ask. HO LY SHiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiT How do you seriously manage to justify statements like this with all your anti snowlflake/safe space shit talking? This bloke paraphrases every post I make chief and has done for a long time. Did you read the thread all the way up? Yes and I still am amazed that YOU would cry bullying because someone is disagreeing with you or challenging you. Can you honestly not see why that's amusing? There's a lesson in here....
|
|
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xLooks like the knives are out for Turnbull, Abbott and the LNP this morning, following their successful SSM policy. Can you imagine if Shorten and Labor has suggested the plebiscite, the gay community would probably hold a ticker tape parade and erect a statue in his honour. It was encouraging to see that none of the proposed "concessions" were accepted by either house of parliament. I think we should be looking to celebrate that a discriminatory law has now been removed, rather than trying to "bait" people (yes the 'dickhead-radar' is well and truly locked onto you rusty ... nowadays we are a bit more PC though and call those comments trolling ... I still prefer dickhead!). We are far more PC these days look at the Milo protests in the PC capital of Australia (Melbourne). I think most people concerned about the law outside of religious fundamentalists and dickhead homophobes were only ever concerned about protecting certain institutions like churches. Not all PC stuff is bad you know. Surely you think that the world's a better place now that people aren't called 'coons' or 'boongs' or 'niggers'. These are all examples of 'political correctness'. Try to be honest when you explain to us why you think it's OK to still use these terms (and dozens of others) because, presumably, a vehement anti-PC crusader like yourself, must think it's OK? I don't know why you're so abusive towards me, its rather unfair and constitutes bullying. If I really cared I could cite at least 10 examples where instead of disagreeing with me you have made abusive statements in this thread alone. I tend not to have an issue with anyone on these boards but my view is that you go out of your way to be unkind towards me. This is the last time I will ask. HO LY SHiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiT How do you seriously manage to justify statements like this with all your anti snowlflake/safe space shit talking? This bloke paraphrases every post I make chief and has done for a long time. Did you read the thread all the way up? Yes and I still am amazed that YOU would cry bullying because someone is disagreeing with you or challenging you. Can you honestly not see why that's amusing? There's a lesson in here.... He's doing neither he's paraphrasing. If there was a disagreement or a question sure. It was insinuated that I thought it was ok to call people c***s and n*****s. How can you not see that as a problem?
|
|
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xIn other news its rather sad to see both Turnbull and Shorten championing their contribution to passing SSM. Both at some point and time have opposed it. Both have changed their tune when it suited their popularity. It's hard to applaud them for bowing to pressure to make this happen. The only party to consistently support SSM from inception to law and without bowing to popularity has been the Greens who should be taking credit for making this happen. I think the Australian Democrats always championed it too ... considering they disappeared how many years ago?? shows how long the argue has been in parliament (with numerous bills having being introduced but never passing) How many abstained?? It said 4 said NO, but didn't mention other numbers as if NO under 5 no official count is undertaken. I wonder how my local MP voted, she originally said NO in the local rags but after a strong YES response in the public vote she said she would change hers to a YES vote too. I wonder if the members from Western Sydney in the predominantly 'No' areas abstained? From memory they were ALP members who personally supported SSM. Tough choice, on one hand voting against your conscience isn't right but you're also elected to represent your constituent.
|
|
|
|
|
Davide82
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xLooks like the knives are out for Turnbull, Abbott and the LNP this morning, following their successful SSM policy. Can you imagine if Shorten and Labor has suggested the plebiscite, the gay community would probably hold a ticker tape parade and erect a statue in his honour. It was encouraging to see that none of the proposed "concessions" were accepted by either house of parliament. I think we should be looking to celebrate that a discriminatory law has now been removed, rather than trying to "bait" people (yes the 'dickhead-radar' is well and truly locked onto you rusty ... nowadays we are a bit more PC though and call those comments trolling ... I still prefer dickhead!). We are far more PC these days look at the Milo protests in the PC capital of Australia (Melbourne). I think most people concerned about the law outside of religious fundamentalists and dickhead homophobes were only ever concerned about protecting certain institutions like churches. Not all PC stuff is bad you know. Surely you think that the world's a better place now that people aren't called 'coons' or 'boongs' or 'niggers'. These are all examples of 'political correctness'. Try to be honest when you explain to us why you think it's OK to still use these terms (and dozens of others) because, presumably, a vehement anti-PC crusader like yourself, must think it's OK? I don't know why you're so abusive towards me, its rather unfair and constitutes bullying. If I really cared I could cite at least 10 examples where instead of disagreeing with me you have made abusive statements in this thread alone. I tend not to have an issue with anyone on these boards but my view is that you go out of your way to be unkind towards me. This is the last time I will ask. HO LY SHiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiT How do you seriously manage to justify statements like this with all your anti snowlflake/safe space shit talking? This bloke paraphrases every post I make chief and has done for a long time. Did you read the thread all the way up? Yes and I still am amazed that YOU would cry bullying because someone is disagreeing with you or challenging you. Can you honestly not see why that's amusing? There's a lesson in here.... He's doing neither he's paraphrasing. If there was a disagreement or a question sure. It was insinuated that I thought it was ok to call people c***s and n*****s. How can you not see that as a problem? Well the constant bleating call to arms I hear is "you gotta be anti-pc or you're a snowflake sjw gender fluid cuck" and he just pointed out that not all pc is bad, which you yourself admit to be the case. I'm not sure you actually know what you believe and just get caught up in trends/hear the loudest voice around you, to be honest. Then again, I am a bully.
|
|
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xLooks like the knives are out for Turnbull, Abbott and the LNP this morning, following their successful SSM policy. Can you imagine if Shorten and Labor has suggested the plebiscite, the gay community would probably hold a ticker tape parade and erect a statue in his honour. It was encouraging to see that none of the proposed "concessions" were accepted by either house of parliament. I think we should be looking to celebrate that a discriminatory law has now been removed, rather than trying to "bait" people (yes the 'dickhead-radar' is well and truly locked onto you rusty ... nowadays we are a bit more PC though and call those comments trolling ... I still prefer dickhead!). We are far more PC these days look at the Milo protests in the PC capital of Australia (Melbourne). I think most people concerned about the law outside of religious fundamentalists and dickhead homophobes were only ever concerned about protecting certain institutions like churches. Not all PC stuff is bad you know. Surely you think that the world's a better place now that people aren't called 'coons' or 'boongs' or 'niggers'. These are all examples of 'political correctness'. Try to be honest when you explain to us why you think it's OK to still use these terms (and dozens of others) because, presumably, a vehement anti-PC crusader like yourself, must think it's OK? I don't know why you're so abusive towards me, its rather unfair and constitutes bullying. If I really cared I could cite at least 10 examples where instead of disagreeing with me you have made abusive statements in this thread alone. I tend not to have an issue with anyone on these boards but my view is that you go out of your way to be unkind towards me. This is the last time I will ask. HO LY SHiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiT How do you seriously manage to justify statements like this with all your anti snowlflake/safe space shit talking? This bloke paraphrases every post I make chief and has done for a long time. Did you read the thread all the way up? Yes and I still am amazed that YOU would cry bullying because someone is disagreeing with you or challenging you. Can you honestly not see why that's amusing? There's a lesson in here.... He's doing neither he's paraphrasing. If there was a disagreement or a question sure. It was insinuated that I thought it was ok to call people c***s and n*****s. How can you not see that as a problem? Well the constant bleating call to arms I hear is "you gotta be anti-pc or you're a snowflake sjw gender fluid cuck" and he just pointed out that not all pc is bad, which you yourself admit to be the case. I'm not sure you actually know what you believe and just get caught up in trends/hear the loudest voice around you, to be honest. Then again, I am a bully. I'm sorry I haven't got to the point in life where I know or understand everything. Some of the discussions I have had on this forum have been most beneficial for learning new things. MCjules to name one has patiently explained many things to me that I was ignorant of or did not understand properly. I would say my contributions have been fairly consistent, I haven't really changed my view on much over time. I wouldn't call you a bully and it was probably the wrong word to use to Muz. I can't say I remember having a reasonable discussion with him where my intelligence was not questioned or my words twisted which is rather frustrating hence my rather rash response to him.
|
|
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xOpposing BLM and feminsm doesnt make one a fascist white nationalist. Milo's fame has been built on the left dishonestly and unfairly labelling him as white supremascist and alt right in efforts to silence him. The more they employ their ghastly sickening mendacious tactics the more victimised and popular he becomes. It makes him a racist and sexist. He also has links to neo-nazi groups which would make him a white nationalist. He married an African American. He is also half Jewish. Obviously, he is a pretty piss poor racist and neo nazi. So these comments are not racist? https://www.welcometocountry.org/milo-yiannopoulos-aboriginal-culture-racists/ Western culture is superior to all other cultures and if you are upset by this then you can go and eat a giant bag of dicks. Its really that simple. No, its not that simple at all. Western culture, philosophy and technological advancements were possible due to interactions with a myriad of civilisations over the course of several thousand years. Wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xOpposing BLM and feminsm doesnt make one a fascist white nationalist. Milo's fame has been built on the left dishonestly and unfairly labelling him as white supremascist and alt right in efforts to silence him. The more they employ their ghastly sickening mendacious tactics the more victimised and popular he becomes. It makes him a racist and sexist. He also has links to neo-nazi groups which would make him a white nationalist. He married an African American. He is also half Jewish. Obviously, he is a pretty piss poor racist and neo nazi. So these comments are not racist? https://www.welcometocountry.org/milo-yiannopoulos-aboriginal-culture-racists/ Western culture is superior to all other cultures and if you are upset by this then you can go and eat a giant bag of dicks. Its really that simple. No, its not that simple at all. Western culture, philosophy and technological advancements were possible due to interactions with a myriad of civilisations over the course of several thousand years. Excellent point. Anyone who has read the Pulitzer prize winning book by Jared Diamond 'Guns, germs and steel' will understand simplistic statements like U44's are the refuge of uneducated ignoramus' or wilfully ignorant shit-stirrers. For a doctor you'd expect better. I am better. Maybe you are the one who needs a rethink? Its difficult for the left to self reflect.
|
|
|
|
|
marconi101
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xOpposing BLM and feminsm doesnt make one a fascist white nationalist. Milo's fame has been built on the left dishonestly and unfairly labelling him as white supremascist and alt right in efforts to silence him. The more they employ their ghastly sickening mendacious tactics the more victimised and popular he becomes. It makes him a racist and sexist. He also has links to neo-nazi groups which would make him a white nationalist. He married an African American. He is also half Jewish. Obviously, he is a pretty piss poor racist and neo nazi. So these comments are not racist? https://www.welcometocountry.org/milo-yiannopoulos-aboriginal-culture-racists/ Western culture is superior to all other cultures and if you are upset by this then you can go and eat a giant bag of dicks. Its really that simple. No, its not that simple at all. Western culture, philosophy and technological advancements were possible due to interactions with a myriad of civilisations over the course of several thousand years. Wrong. Don't be lazy. Elucidate your point
He was a man of specific quirks. He believed that all meals should be earned through physical effort. He also contended, zealously like a drunk with a political point, that the third dimension would not be possible if it werent for the existence of water.
|
|
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xOpposing BLM and feminsm doesnt make one a fascist white nationalist. Milo's fame has been built on the left dishonestly and unfairly labelling him as white supremascist and alt right in efforts to silence him. The more they employ their ghastly sickening mendacious tactics the more victimised and popular he becomes. It makes him a racist and sexist. He also has links to neo-nazi groups which would make him a white nationalist. He married an African American. He is also half Jewish. Obviously, he is a pretty piss poor racist and neo nazi. So these comments are not racist? https://www.welcometocountry.org/milo-yiannopoulos-aboriginal-culture-racists/ Did he hurt your feelings? Its not white people's fault that A) Aboriginal art is total fucking garbage, and B) Aborigines couldn't invent the wheel. Western culture is superior to all other cultures and if you are upset by this then you can go and eat a giant bag of dicks. Its really that simple. I remember when you were a measured, deep thinking, nuanced thinker on these pages. What the bloody hell has happened to you? You've dead set lost the plot of late. Ranting about Hilary, siding with MRA activists, denigrating other cultures, defending white supremacists?! WTF? No, you remember when I agreed with your side of the political spectrum. I became successful and enlightened about reality. I started caring about reality and stopped caring about people's feelings. You're allowed to live in your bubble but I'm shocked someone your age hasn't worked it out yet. Oh well, live and let live I suppose. As for your second statement, Hillary is an evil Psychopath. Americans knew more about her than you or I and that's why they didn't vote for her. Other cultures are inferior to Western culture. This is overwhelmingly obvious to anyone, and again, I don't care about people's feelings. I care about people, I just don't care about their feelings. Milo isn't a white supremacist. He is a Western supremacist, like me. He is hated by actual white supremacists, like that c*unt Richard Spencer who hate him cos he likes black men, is gay and his mother is Jewish. This isn't hard.
|
|
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xOpposing BLM and feminsm doesnt make one a fascist white nationalist. Milo's fame has been built on the left dishonestly and unfairly labelling him as white supremascist and alt right in efforts to silence him. The more they employ their ghastly sickening mendacious tactics the more victimised and popular he becomes. It makes him a racist and sexist. He also has links to neo-nazi groups which would make him a white nationalist. He married an African American. He is also half Jewish. Obviously, he is a pretty piss poor racist and neo nazi. So these comments are not racist? https://www.welcometocountry.org/milo-yiannopoulos-aboriginal-culture-racists/ Western culture is superior to all other cultures and if you are upset by this then you can go and eat a giant bag of dicks. Its really that simple. No, its not that simple at all. Western culture, philosophy and technological advancements were possible due to interactions with a myriad of civilisations over the course of several thousand years. Wrong. Convincing response!
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xOpposing BLM and feminsm doesnt make one a fascist white nationalist. Milo's fame has been built on the left dishonestly and unfairly labelling him as white supremascist and alt right in efforts to silence him. The more they employ their ghastly sickening mendacious tactics the more victimised and popular he becomes. It makes him a racist and sexist. He also has links to neo-nazi groups which would make him a white nationalist. He married an African American. He is also half Jewish. Obviously, he is a pretty piss poor racist and neo nazi. So these comments are not racist? https://www.welcometocountry.org/milo-yiannopoulos-aboriginal-culture-racists/ Western culture is superior to all other cultures and if you are upset by this then you can go and eat a giant bag of dicks. Its really that simple. No, its not that simple at all. Western culture, philosophy and technological advancements were possible due to interactions with a myriad of civilisations over the course of several thousand years. Wrong. Convincing response! You are not wrong you're full of shit. You could say that about any civilisation on this planet.
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xOpposing BLM and feminsm doesnt make one a fascist white nationalist. Milo's fame has been built on the left dishonestly and unfairly labelling him as white supremascist and alt right in efforts to silence him. The more they employ their ghastly sickening mendacious tactics the more victimised and popular he becomes. It makes him a racist and sexist. He also has links to neo-nazi groups which would make him a white nationalist. He married an African American. He is also half Jewish. Obviously, he is a pretty piss poor racist and neo nazi. So these comments are not racist? https://www.welcometocountry.org/milo-yiannopoulos-aboriginal-culture-racists/ Did he hurt your feelings? Its not white people's fault that A) Aboriginal art is total fucking garbage, and B) Aborigines couldn't invent the wheel. Western culture is superior to all other cultures and if you are upset by this then you can go and eat a giant bag of dicks. Its really that simple. I remember when you were a measured, deep thinking, nuanced thinker on these pages. What the bloody hell has happened to you? You've dead set lost the plot of late. Ranting about Hilary, siding with MRA activists, denigrating other cultures, defending white supremacists?! WTF? No, you remember when I agreed with your side of the political spectrum. I became successful and enlightened about reality. I started caring about reality and stopped caring about people's feelings. You're allowed to live in your bubble but I'm shocked someone your age hasn't worked it out yet. Oh well, live and let live I suppose. As for your second statement, Hillary is an evil Psychopath. Americans knew more about her than you or I and that's why they didn't vote for her. Other cultures are inferior to Western culture. This is overwhelmingly obvious to anyone, and again, I don't care about people's feelings. I care about people, I just don't care about their feelings. Milo isn't a white supremacist. He is a Western supremacist, like me. He is hated by actual white supremacists, like that c*unt Richard Spencer who hate him cos he likes black men, is gay and his mother is Jewish. This isn't hard. Did your wife leave you for Richard Di Natele? Did Bill Shorten run over your cat?
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xOpposing BLM and feminsm doesnt make one a fascist white nationalist. Milo's fame has been built on the left dishonestly and unfairly labelling him as white supremascist and alt right in efforts to silence him. The more they employ their ghastly sickening mendacious tactics the more victimised and popular he becomes. It makes him a racist and sexist. He also has links to neo-nazi groups which would make him a white nationalist. He married an African American. He is also half Jewish. Obviously, he is a pretty piss poor racist and neo nazi. So these comments are not racist? https://www.welcometocountry.org/milo-yiannopoulos-aboriginal-culture-racists/ Did he hurt your feelings? Its not white people's fault that A) Aboriginal art is total fucking garbage, and B) Aborigines couldn't invent the wheel. Western culture is superior to all other cultures and if you are upset by this then you can go and eat a giant bag of dicks. Its really that simple. I remember when you were a measured, deep thinking, nuanced thinker on these pages. What the bloody hell has happened to you? You've dead set lost the plot of late. Ranting about Hilary, siding with MRA activists, denigrating other cultures, defending white supremacists?! WTF? No, you remember when I agreed with your side of the political spectrum. I became successful and enlightened about reality. I started caring about reality and stopped caring about people's feelings. You're allowed to live in your bubble but I'm shocked someone your age hasn't worked it out yet. Oh well, live and let live I suppose. As for your second statement, Hillary is an evil Psychopath. Americans knew more about her than you or I and that's why they didn't vote for her. Other cultures are inferior to Western culture. This is overwhelmingly obvious to anyone, and again, I don't care about people's feelings. I care about people, I just don't care about their feelings. Milo isn't a white supremacist. He is a Western supremacist, like me. He is hated by actual white supremacists, like that c*unt Richard Spencer who hate him cos he likes black men, is gay and his mother is Jewish. This isn't hard. Did your wife leave you for Richard Di Natele? Did Bill Shorten run over your cat? Maybe he ate a dodgy halal snack pack.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
|