batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
well i am not sure you can TRUST the internet to be 100% accurate.....and i can only speak of the industry that i am in...but compliance has risen under this government along with general on costs
|
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
thupercoach wrote:Davis_Patik wrote:Rudd v Abbott = the failure v the hopeless. Well, Abbott deserves his chance and Rudd is a proven failure. Out of curiosity, is he the old Rudd or the new Rudd? The man is a chameleon. Edited by thupercoach: 11/7/2013 11:46:03 PM Can you outline why exactly Abbott deserves a chance? The man is a proven liar, proven to have no political conviction, and has zero policy ambition other than a bunch of meaningless slogans relating back to John Howard.
|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Davis_Patik wrote:Rudd v Abbott = the failure v the hopeless. Well, Abbott deserves his chance and Rudd is a proven failure. Out of curiosity, is he the old Rudd or the new Rudd? The man is a chameleon. Edited by thupercoach: 11/7/2013 11:46:03 PM
|
|
|
Davis_Patik
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Rudd v Abbott = the failure v the hopeless.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:afromanGT wrote:ozboy wrote:Anyone think Abbott is a chance to be dislodged by Turnbull? No chance at all. Abbott's job is safe until after the election at worst. Don't think Turnbull is popular within his own party, seen as a bit soft by some. Also lost points with the public due to his broadband policy. The party views him as too left for the party line. But he's someone who would legitimately lead the country. I think of they get rid of Abbott after the election Joe Hockey is likely to get the top job.
|
|
|
macktheknife
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:I guess when you're a 2, the pool of bangable women is pretty open. Pretty much. :lol: It stretches from 0 to 10. \:d/
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
I guess when you're a 2, the pool of bangable women is pretty open.
|
|
|
macktheknife
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16K,
Visits: 0
|
One on the right: 8/10 would bang. One on the left: 7/10 still pretty cute would bang.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:afromanGT wrote:ozboy wrote:Anyone think Abbott is a chance to be dislodged by Turnbull? No chance at all. Abbott's job is safe until after the election at worst. Don't think Turnbull is popular within his own party, seen as a bit soft by some. Also lost points with the public due to his broadband policy. Pretty much this. Turnbull had public credibility only up until the point that he became Mr Broadband.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:ozboy wrote:Anyone think Abbott is a chance to be dislodged by Turnbull? No chance at all. Abbott's job is safe until after the election at worst. Don't think Turnbull is popular within his own party, seen as a bit soft by some. Also lost points with the public due to his broadband policy.
|
|
|
ozboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
ozboy wrote:Anyone think Abbott is a chance to be dislodged by Turnbull? No chance at all. Abbott's job is safe until after the election at worst.
|
|
|
macktheknife
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16K,
Visits: 0
|
#ReTurnbull
|
|
|
Mr
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6K,
Visits: 0
|
ozboy wrote:Anyone think Abbott is a chance to be dislodged by Turnbull? No chance
|
|
|
ozboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Anyone think Abbott is a chance to be dislodged by Turnbull?
|
|
|
macktheknife
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16K,
Visits: 0
|
Problem is mainstream media don't pick up on stuff like this. That shit is too fucking nerdy. We need more 'foxy roxy' ads to drag in gutter breathing bogans who want to perve on hot chicks, not some fucking boring charts that no-one can understand. Same shit happens with the NBN. Tech writers are sideline, and instead we get idiots like in this article: http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-opinion/future-of-broadband-going-down-to-the-wire-20130702-2p9qq.htmlI can't for the life of me figure out why anyone would waste money on giving a business law and taxation professor an article on the NBN. It's like giving Craig Foster a brief to write about an AFL match. notorganic wrote:thupercoach wrote:notorganic wrote:I love that Tony Abbott keeps saying that its "the same old Kevin Rudd" whilst never letting up on referring to John Howard Because Abbott was a successful health minister in Howard's highly successful government. He is establishing his credibility. Whereas Rudd is the same old recycled failed leader dumped 3 years ago for "losing his way". by what measures are we claiming that Abbott was a successful health minister in the most profligate government in Australian history? Maybe he's a success because he had his power stripped by the Parliament over his inability to do his job as health minister because of his religious views?
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
All conservatives would have been successful before the days of the internet and fact checking.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
Abbott seems the kind of politician that would have been very successful before the days of the internet, when fact checking bullshit like "the ALP is drowning small business in regulations" was near impossible. http://larvatusprodeo.net/archives/2013/07/has-regulation-really-gotten-out-of-control-under-ruddgillard/
|
|
|
433
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
:lol:
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
[youtube]i-3LWX_mcB4[/youtube]
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
thupercoach wrote:notorganic wrote:I love that Tony Abbott keeps saying that its "the same old Kevin Rudd" whilst never letting up on referring to John Howard Because Abbott was a successful health minister in Howard's highly successful government. He is establishing his credibility. Whereas Rudd is the same old recycled failed leader dumped 3 years ago for "losing his way". by what measures are we claiming that Abbott was a successful health minister in the most profligate government in Australian history?
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
thupercoach wrote:notorganic wrote:I love that Tony Abbott keeps saying that its "the same old Kevin Rudd" whilst never letting up on referring to John Howard Because Abbott was a successful health minister in Howard's highly successful government. He is establishing his credibility. Whereas Rudd is the same old recycled failed leader dumped 3 years ago for "losing his way". This is the same Tony Abbott who has allegedly abandoned his stance on gay marriage and abortion in order to win power. He can't exactly take the high road in a character assassination.
|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:I love that Tony Abbott keeps saying that its "the same old Kevin Rudd" whilst never letting up on referring to John Howard Because Abbott was a successful health minister in Howard's highly successful government. He is establishing his credibility. Whereas Rudd is the same old recycled failed leader dumped 3 years ago for "losing his way".
|
|
|
WaMackie
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3K,
Visits: 0
|
Australia is a much nicer place to live in now that Gillard is no longer PM.
That is all.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
RedKat wrote:http://www.news.com.au/national-news/federal-election/kevin-rudd-cuts-himself-shaving-then-shares-it-on-twitter/story-fnho52ip-1226676991326
](*,) ](*,) ](*,) HOW IS THIS NEWS?!
|
|
|
rocknerd
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Honestly, this election will come down to two issues and the Greens will ultimately support labour on Both.
If it comes to another hung parliament and the greens are the decider the issues will be
1. Marriage equality and whether Rudd will bring it to the parliament or a referendum
2. asylum seekers and the best mental health processing policy.
Rudd just needs to keep things going forward for Australia and allow Abbott to shoot himself in the foot over some daft foot in mouth comment and Rudd's one of the people personality will overcome the LNP/ Katter party.
|
|
|
ozboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Scoll wrote:The Greens are the kid brother at the politics table screaming that they are important but everyone knows they have no real sway... Greens hold the balance of power in the senate and ultimately decide what becomes law in this country. #Argument invalidated
|
|
|
Scoll
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:Maybe. But they've indicated it as a possibility with Gillard burning her bridges. Rudd would have to get a brown tongue. No, the Greens will not side with the LNP, unless the ALP all of a sudden went more right wing than the LNP (which at this stage is nigh on impossible). The Greens are the kid brother at the politics table screaming that they are important but everyone knows they have no real sway as they always go back to their big brother ALP. Sometimes they can be given a token gesture in policy consideration, but only if it suits Labors ideology too.
|
|
|
macktheknife
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:interesting on the ABC last night the unions and the businesses being sent broke by the NBN CO, similar situation that occured during the insulation and solar scheme....... They aren't really similar. Insulation and Solar Schemes causing companies to go broke is because a natural cycle of creating a boom with Government investment in worthy projects, followed by the bust once those schemes are done. Solar Companies were in my not expert knowledge, hurt much more by the various State Government crackdowns on the Feed In Tarrifs that created the initial big boom in the first place. The FIT were so good that, far more people took them up than expected and they cost the state's much more money. The NBN situation is a classic case of the fallacy of Private Sector "efficiency" failing by over promising and under delivering. Instead of just having NBN run the build process, and have the workers as part of NBNco like the old days with Telecom and the PMG, it was put up to open tender for the private sector. The private sector (in this case, Service Stream) came to NBNCo in the form of Syntheo, which is a company formed in a joint venture between Service Stream and Lend Lease), and tendered for the job. That private company was then unable to do the work they said they could do. They were sub-contracting out to other companies who then sub-contracted it as well, each taking their own slice of the money, causing issues with hiring staff and getting the appropriate level of resources to do the job. In the end, Syntheo had to hand back the Northern Territory NBN build for NBN to take over and do what it should have been doing all along which was build it itself. This has cost Service Stream 100's of millions of dollars both in missed revenue and several million dollars direct penalties. The NBN is roughly have of Service Stream's revenue, and losing this contract caused their share price to collapse, like any other company who had half their revenue evaporate for fucking up would have happen. And obviously, this trickles down to all the sub-contractors. Lend Lease on the other hand are a mega corporation for whom the NBN represents only a small part of their overall revenue. If NBN had not been made to worship at the altar of the private sector, no private companies would have been involved, and no sub-contracting onions would have created a situation where failure like this could happen. Edited by macktheknife: 10/7/2013 02:25:57 PM
|
|
|
ozboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
BTW Joffa, fix the thread title. Ain't gonna happen anymore.
|
|
|