Right-Wingers are less intelligent than Left-Wingers, says study


Right-Wingers are less intelligent than Left-Wingers, says study

Author
Message
Pasquali
Pasquali
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K, Visits: 0
Janette_Clarrie - 29 Oct 2024 11:36 PM
notorganic - 9 Feb 2012 10:35 PM

It’s interesting to see this study framed alongside discussions of the Dunning-Kruger effect, which shows that people with lower ability may overestimate their competence, often leading them to express strong confidence in their beliefs. The study mentioned here suggests that individuals with lower cognitive ability may lean towards conservative ideologies, possibly as they find comfort in the sense of stability and order these ideologies can provide. However, it’s worth noting that intelligence and social/political attitudes are complex and don’t necessarily mean that all conservatives are prejudiced or that intelligence determines political affiliation alone.

Hey, do you want to check out our new forum? everyone has moved here just so you know 
https://greenandgoldfc.com/

Janette_Clarrie
Janette_Clarrie
Under 7s
Under 7s (1 reputation)Under 7s (1 reputation)Under 7s (1 reputation)Under 7s (1 reputation)Under 7s (1 reputation)Under 7s (1 reputation)Under 7s (1 reputation)Under 7s (1 reputation)Under 7s (1 reputation)Under 7s (1 reputation)Under 7s (1 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1, Visits: 0
notorganic - 9 Feb 2012 10:35 PM
Interesting to see this side-by-side with the Dunning-Kruger effect and how many right leaning people claim intellectual superiority over others.


- Children with low intelligence grow up to be prejudiced
- Right-wing views make the less intelligent feel 'safe'
- Analysis of more than 15,000 people


Right-wingers tend to be less intelligent than left-wingers, and people with low childhood intelligence tend to grow up to have racist and anti-gay views, says a controversial new study.

Conservative politics work almost as a 'gateway' into prejudice against others, say the Canadian academics.

The paper analysed large UK studies which compared childhood intelligence with political views in adulthood across more than 15,000 people.

The authors claim that people with low intelligence gravitate towards right-wing views because they make them feel safe.

Crucially, people's educational level is not what determines whether they are racist or not - it's innate intelligence, according to the academics.

Social status also appears to play no part.

The study, published in Psychological Science, claims that right-wing ideology forms a 'pathway' for people with low reasoning ability to become prejudiced against groups such as other races and gay people.

'Cognitive abilities are critical in forming impressions of other people and in being open minded,' say the researchers.

'Individuals with lower cognitive abilities may gravitate towards more socially conservative right-wing ideologies that maintain the status quo.

'It provides a sense of order.'

The study, by academics at Brock University in Ontario, Canada, used information from two UK studies from 1958 and 1970 , where several thousand children were assessed for intelligence at age 10 and 11, and then asked political questions aged 33.
The 1958 National Child Development involved 4,267 men and 4,537 women born in 1958. In general, I like to read about various such studies. And I even write various written works about it. There is https://essay-company.org/write-my-essay/, where you can find all the information you need for your work.

The British Cohort Study involved 3,412 men and 3,658 women born in 1970.

It's the first time the data from these studies has been used in this way.

In adulthood, the children were asked whether they agreed with statements such as, 'I wouldn't mind working with people from other races,' and 'I wouldn't mind if a family of a different race moved next door.'

They were also asked whether they agreed with statements about typically right-wing and socially conservative politics such as, 'Give law breakers stiffer sentences,' and 'Schools should teach children to obey authority.'

The researchers also compared their results against a 1986 American study which included tests of cognitive ability and questions assessing prejudice against homosexuals.

The authors claim that there is a strong correlation between low intelligence both as a child and an adult, and right-wing politics.

The authors also claim that conservative politics is part of a complex relationship that leads people to become prejudices.

'Conservative ideology represents a critical pathway through which childhood intelligence predicts racism in adulthood,' says the paper.

'In psychological terms, the relation between intelligence and prejudice may stem from the propensity of individuals with lower cognitive ability to endorse more right wing conservative ideologies because such ideologies offer a psychological sense of stability and order.'

'Clearly, however, all socially conservative people are not prejudiced, and all prejudiced persons are not conservative.'

It’s interesting to see this study framed alongside discussions of the Dunning-Kruger effect, which shows that people with lower ability may overestimate their competence, often leading them to express strong confidence in their beliefs. The study mentioned here suggests that individuals with lower cognitive ability may lean towards conservative ideologies, possibly as they find comfort in the sense of stability and order these ideologies can provide. However, it’s worth noting that intelligence and social/political attitudes are complex and don’t necessarily mean that all conservatives are prejudiced or that intelligence determines political affiliation alone.

Edited
Last Month by Janette_Clarrie
toffeeAU
toffeeAU
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.4K, Visits: 0
ozboy wrote:
afromanGT wrote:
Quote:
A sample of 15,000 is waaaaaaaaaaaay beyond the minimum required to draw inferences about the population.

I dunno. You've got 2,326 posts. I can look at the dozen threads you've started and deduce that you're an idiot. So it would appear that .5% is enough of a sample base.

In reference to statistics, I was thinking that with over 50K posts, law of averages has to prove you intelligent eventually...

What about forums with games threads?
ozboy
ozboy
World Class
World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
Quote:
A sample of 15,000 is waaaaaaaaaaaay beyond the minimum required to draw inferences about the population.

I dunno. You've got 2,326 posts. I can look at the dozen threads you've started and deduce that you're an idiot. So it would appear that .5% is enough of a sample base.

In reference to statistics, I was thinking that with over 50K posts, law of averages has to prove you intelligent eventually...
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
Quote:
A sample of 15,000 is waaaaaaaaaaaay beyond the minimum required to draw inferences about the population.

I dunno. You've got 2,326 posts. I can look at the dozen threads you've started and deduce that you're an idiot. So it would appear that .5% is enough of a sample base.
ozboy
ozboy
World Class
World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K, Visits: 0
Fredsta wrote:
Obviously it doesn't apply to all, in my course the general population is dominated by left wing leaning students who just talk absolute nonsensical dross all day while the few righties almost always show them up.
At least it's entertaining.

A sample of 15,000 is waaaaaaaaaaaay beyond the minimum required to draw inferences about the population.
You can treat the research as fact for the population in general (unless of course there were major errors/biases in how the sample was obtained)

Edited by ozboy: 11/2/2012 04:09:41 PM
Fredsta
Fredsta
Legend
Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K, Visits: 0
Obviously it doesn't apply to all, in my course the general population is dominated by left wing leaning students who just talk absolute nonsensical dross all day while the few righties almost always show them up.
At least it's entertaining.
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
cbowden9000 wrote:
What about players that can play on either wing?

Players that go both ways are always a little confused...
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
Prejudice May Have Evolutionary Basis, Say 'Male Warrior' Researchers

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/06/prejudice-may-have-evolutionary-basis_n_1258390.html

Does racism stem from low intelligence? It's not entirely clear, though recent research found links between bigoted thinking and low scores on I.Q tests. But a new study points to an even deeper explanation for xenophobia and intolerance.

It suggests that prejudice is programmed into our genes.

The study, published January 24 in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, suggests that racism, for example, is essentially a holdover from ancient history - when humans lived in tribes and it made sense to view outsiders with hostility and fear.

Study author Dr. Mark van Vugttold the Telegraph that their research "suggests that the human mind is shaped in a way that tends to perpetuate conflict with 'outsiders'."

Van Vugt and his co-authors launched their research in an effort to find support for what's known as the "male warrior hypothesis." That's the notion that that men evolved to show aggression against other men whom they think belong to an 'outgroup.' Racist thinking is one result of such a belief. But as one of Van Gugt's co-authors, Michigan State University biologist Dr. Carlos Navarrete, told The Huffington Post in an email, it also helps account for rivalries and outright hostility on the basis of "nationality, ethnicity, school, tribe, gang, corporation, political party/faction, and the like."

And, yes, football fans, the hypothesis may also account for the hostility among fans of rival teams. True, we might not tend to think as sports rivalries as manifestation of racism. But evidence suggests that all sorts of human activities that pit one person against another may arise out of the same genetic package.

Is prejudice only a male thing? Not quite. But the study's authors say their research suggests that men more or less started it, writing in the paper that ingroup-outgroup fireworks "could have affected the social psychologies of men and women differently."

A LiveScience report suggests that physical appearance may also play a role in prejudiced thinking:

"In a previous study, Navarrete found that white women evaluated black men differently depending on where they were in their menstrual cycle; they rated the men most negatively, in terms of attractiveness and scariness, when they were most likely to conceive. Other studies found that, regardless of race, women view physically formidable men more negatively than weaker-looking men. Taken together, the researchers suggest that women may instinctually avoid people who pose the greatest reproductive threat — formidable outgroup males."

Navarette said the negative response wouldn't be expected "If a woman is acquainted with a person of a different race, and she knows this person to not be physically coercive or dangerous in other ways." In that case, he said, she might even have a more positive reaction to such a person, because a foreign mate would have the bonus of adding diversity to the gene pool.

Perhaps surprisingly, the researchers are optimistic about making things better. Prejudice will still be here as long as ingroup/outgroup-style thinking is around, but making people feel like they're all part of the same group would do a lot to help us all play nice.

Said Navarette, "The more information people have about the target, the less they should expect race to be diagnostic of behavior."
imnofreak
imnofreak
Legend
Legend (36K reputation)Legend (36K reputation)Legend (36K reputation)Legend (36K reputation)Legend (36K reputation)Legend (36K reputation)Legend (36K reputation)Legend (36K reputation)Legend (36K reputation)Legend (36K reputation)Legend (36K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 35K, Visits: 0
cbowden9000 wrote:
What about players that can play on either wing?


=d>


Bowden
Bowden
Legend
Legend (17K reputation)Legend (17K reputation)Legend (17K reputation)Legend (17K reputation)Legend (17K reputation)Legend (17K reputation)Legend (17K reputation)Legend (17K reputation)Legend (17K reputation)Legend (17K reputation)Legend (17K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 16K, Visits: 0
What about players that can play on either wing?
Shaker
Shaker
Pro
Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)Pro (4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.9K, Visits: 0
Booyah!
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
Article is pretty much a social commentary on what most on this site already knew.
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
Interesting to see this side-by-side with the Dunning-Kruger effect and how many right leaning people claim intellectual superiority over others.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2095549/Right-wingers-intelligent-left-wingers-says-controversial-study--conservative-politics-lead-people-racist.html#ixzz1leFs3VoP

- Children with low intelligence grow up to be prejudiced
- Right-wing views make the less intelligent feel 'safe'
- Analysis of more than 15,000 people


Right-wingers tend to be less intelligent than left-wingers, and people with low childhood intelligence tend to grow up to have racist and anti-gay views, says a controversial new study.

Conservative politics work almost as a 'gateway' into prejudice against others, say the Canadian academics.

The paper analysed large UK studies which compared childhood intelligence with political views in adulthood across more than 15,000 people.

The authors claim that people with low intelligence gravitate towards right-wing views because they make them feel safe.

Crucially, people's educational level is not what determines whether they are racist or not - it's innate intelligence, according to the academics.

Social status also appears to play no part.

The study, published in Psychological Science, claims that right-wing ideology forms a 'pathway' for people with low reasoning ability to become prejudiced against groups such as other races and gay people.

'Cognitive abilities are critical in forming impressions of other people and in being open minded,' say the researchers.

'Individuals with lower cognitive abilities may gravitate towards more socially conservative right-wing ideologies that maintain the status quo.

'It provides a sense of order.'

The study, by academics at Brock University in Ontario, Canada, used information from two UK studies from 1958 and 1970 , where several thousand children were assessed for intelligence at age 10 and 11, and then asked political questions aged 33.
The 1958 National Child Development involved 4,267 men and 4,537 women born in 1958.

The British Cohort Study involved 3,412 men and 3,658 women born in 1970.

It's the first time the data from these studies has been used in this way.

In adulthood, the children were asked whether they agreed with statements such as, 'I wouldn't mind working with people from other races,' and 'I wouldn't mind if a family of a different race moved next door.'

They were also asked whether they agreed with statements about typically right-wing and socially conservative politics such as, 'Give law breakers stiffer sentences,' and 'Schools should teach children to obey authority.'

The researchers also compared their results against a 1986 American study which included tests of cognitive ability and questions assessing prejudice against homosexuals.

The authors claim that there is a strong correlation between low intelligence both as a child and an adult, and right-wing politics.

The authors also claim that conservative politics is part of a complex relationship that leads people to become prejudices.

'Conservative ideology represents a critical pathway through which childhood intelligence predicts racism in adulthood,' says the paper.

'In psychological terms, the relation between intelligence and prejudice may stem from the propensity of individuals with lower cognitive ability to endorse more right wing conservative ideologies because such ideologies offer a psychological sense of stability and order.'

'Clearly, however, all socially conservative people are not prejudiced, and all prejudiced persons are not conservative.'
GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search