Heineken
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjo wrote:Something similar happened a few years ago, didn't it? It was a French airplane from memory? Did they ever find the black box from that crash? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_France_Flight_447
WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!

|
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
But how did these people get on the flight in the first place with stolen passports?
|
|
|
Joffa
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K,
Visits: 0
|
Ukraine crisis: Russian troops take Ukrainian border guards hostage William Hague demands that Russia attends Ukraine peace talks, as Russian troops take their 11th border control post in Crimea Armed men, believed to be Russian servicemen, march outside an Ukrainian military base in the village of Perevalnoye Damien McElroy By Damien McElroy, Donetsk 10:39AM GMT 09 Mar 2014 Russian forces have taken control of a Ukrainian border guard post in western Crimea, trapping 30 personnel inside. The latest move by the Russians to tighten their grip on Crimea was made without the firing of guns – unlike on Saturday, when a Ukrainian border patrol plane was fired at, and European monitors trying to enter Crimea were repelled by "warning shots" from balaclava-clad militias. The capture of the Chernomorskoye border post – the 11th so far – unfolded without bloodshed before dawn. Russian forces' seizure of the southern Ukrainian region, which began 11 days ago, has been without open combat. Ukrainian troops are trapped in a number of bases but have offered no armed resistance. The latest seizure came as William Hague demanded Russia joins formal negotiations over the crisis in Ukraine, as pressure grows for talks under the terms of a treaty in which the Kremlin guaranteed the independence of the former Soviet state. Four party talks between Russia, US, Britain and Ukraine under the Budapest Memorandum offer a proposed route out of the crisis that has erupted since Russia took control of the Crimean peninsula and threatened further intervention on behalf of Russian-speaking populations in the east. The Foreign Secretary told BBC One's Andrew Marr programme that Russian had obligations to get involved in direct talks. "We want see diplomatic progress on Ukraine. We want to see tensions reduce," he said. "It is in our national interest that international treaties and laws are upheld." Vitaly Klitshko, a former world boxing champion and leading candidate for Ukraine's May presidential elections, also demanded that the countries that guaranteed Ukraine's integrity begin negotiations to end the Russian intervention. "This is an aggression against our country," he told a meeting in Donetsk, in the Russian speaking east. "We expect in the next couple of days a meeting under the Budapest agreement. Crimea is part of Ukraine and everything that happens in Crimea is happening in Ukraine. "The independence of Ukraine has been guaranteed by Russia, the US and Britain. Those guarantees said we would live in safety. Those countries must prevent the violence." Mr Hague said that negotiations were in Russia's interest and persisting on its present course would cost Moscow greatly. "Over time this will be a serious miscalculation for Russia," he said. A Russian official met Ukraine's ambassador to Moscow last week but otherwise the Kremlin has spurned the caretaker government, claiming it had taken power in an unconstitutional coup. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ukraine/10685915/Ukraine-crisis-Russian-troops-take-Ukrainian-border-guards-hostage.html
|
|
|
Heineken
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K,
Visits: 0
|
Quote:Malaysia investigators probe possible airport security lapse BY NILUKSI KOSWANAGE KUALA LUMPUR Sun Mar 9, 2014 8:23am EDT 0 COMMENTS inShare Share this
Email Print RELATED TOPICS World » (Reuters) - Malaysian officials are poring over CCTV footage and questioning immigration officers and guards at Kuala Lumpur's international airport, concerned that a security breach may be connected to the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines flight MH370.
Suspicions that the Beijing-bound Boeing jet, which vanished on Saturday with 239 people on board, may have been hijacked or bombed have risen after at least two passengers were found to be using stolen passports, though Malaysia's government stressed it was considering all possibilities.
Malaysian investigators, assisted by the FBI, are probing the identities of four passengers in particular, two Malaysian officials with knowledge of the investigation told Reuters.
The four comprise two travelers with European passports, possibly Ukrainian, in addition to two travelling on stolen Austrian and Italian passports, the sources said.
"We have deployed our investigators to look through all the security camera footage. Also, they are interviewing immigration officials who let the imposters through," said one official with direct knowledge of the investigation.
"Early indications show some sort of a security lapse, but I cannot say any further right now."
The head of Malaysia's civil aviation authority told reporters on Sunday that two "imposters" had been identified by investigators as they made their way from check-in, through immigration to the departure gate. Malaysia's transport minister, Hishamuddin Hussein, confirmed that investigators were looking at four passengers.
A spokesperson for Malaysia Airports Holdings, which operates the country's airports, declined to comment.
Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak said on Sunday that the country's airport security protocols would be reviewed, The Star newspaper reported.
Asked how strongly investigators suspected foul play, the second official said: "There are initial indications but it's too early ... who knows what happened on that plane. But we are keeping our minds open."
UIGHUR LINK "NOT RULED OUT"
The timing of the incident, a week after knife-wielding assailants killed at least 29 people at a train station in the southwestern Chinese city of Kunming, led to speculation that militants from China's Uighur Muslim minority could be involved.
One of the Malaysian officials said the authorities were not ruling out Uighur involvement in the jet's disappearance, noting that Uighurs were deported to China from Malaysia in 2011 and 2012 for carrying false passports.
"This is not being ruled out. We have sent back Uighurs who had false passports before. It is too early to say whether there is a link," the official said.
Malaysia, a Muslim-majority country that has courted close ties with Beijing in recent years, deported 11 Uighurs in 2011 it said were involved in a human smuggling syndicate.
The next year, it was condemned by U.S.-based Human Rights Watch for deporting six Uighurs the rights group described as asylum seekers. Human Rights Watch said the six had been detained while trying to leave Malaysia on fake passports.
A source with ties to the Chinese leadership said there was no confirmed connection to Uighur militants, but described the timing as "very suspicious" coming so soon after the Kunming attack.
Li Jiheng, governor of Yunnan province where Kunming is located, told reporters on Sunday that there was currently no information to show that the knife attack and the missing flight were "necessarily connected".
Malaysia Airlines operations director, Hugh Dunleavy, told reporters in Beijing that they were aware of the reports of stolen passports.
"As far as we're aware, every one of the people onboard that aircraft had a visa to go to China," he said. "That doesn't mean they weren't false passports, but that means that it's probably lower down on the probability scale."
China has a reputation for being rigorous on visa approvals and checks at border entry points, but the pair's European passports may have enabled them to bypass the visa scrutiny.
Under a recently launched exemption program, citizens of many Western nations are granted visa-free entry for 72 hours upon arrival in Beijing as long as they have an onward ticket.
The BBC reported that the men using the stolen passports had purchased tickets together and were flying on to Europe.
"People with fake passports present a huge problem for security," said Yang Shu, a security expert at China's Lanzhou University. "I strongly believe that they had something to do with the plane going missing."
(Additional reporting by Ben Blanchard, Adam Rose and Megha Rajagopalan in Beijing; Eveline Danubrata in Kuala Lumpur; Writing by Stuart Grudgings; Editing by Alex Richardson) http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/09/us-malaysia-airlines-security-idUSBREA280BD20140309Looking increasingly grimmer by the hour. The fact that it was a China bound plane, might suggest it's Uighur related. Although, we shouldn't speculate. Still too early. It took the investigators nearly two years to locate, and bring up the wreckage of the Air France jet that went down smack bang in the middle of the Atlantic a few years ago. And they recovered the black boxes in nearly 6,000 meters of water. I doubt the waters off Southern Vietnam are close to being that deep, but it could still take months, to find the actual wreckage, and perhaps years to find out what happened. The Royal Australian Air Force has now sent 2 Lockheed P-3 Orion planes to assist in the search. Plenty of nations have supplied various military and civilian aircraft, as well as naval ships to assist in the search & rescue efforts - 40 aircraft, and 34 ships. I wouldn't be surprised if they find the location of the wreckage this week. Edited by Heineken: 10/3/2014 12:09:58 AM
WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!

|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
I'd imagine that the currents and rough waters of the Atlantic would make it more difficult to search.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
That's not racist at all :lol:
|
|
|
Joffa
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K,
Visits: 0
|
Man with stolen passport on jet was asylum seeker Tuesday, March 11, 2014 KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia — A man traveling with a stolen passport on a missing Malaysia Airlines jetliner was an Iranian teenager trying to migrate to Germany, and is not believed to have any terrorist links, police said Tuesday. The announcement is likely to dampen, at least for now, speculation that the disappearance of the Boeing 777 was linked to terrorism. Police said a second passenger also traveling with a stolen passport has not been identified. Both bought their tickets in Thailand and entered Malaysia together. No debris from the plane has been found. On Tuesday, baffled authorities expanded their search to the opposite side of Malaysia from where it disappeared more than three days ago with 239 people on board. The airline says the pilots did not send any distress signals, suggesting a sudden and possibly catastrophic incident. Speculation has ranged widely about possible causes, including pilot error, plane malfunction, hijacking and terrorism. News that two of the passengers were traveling with stolen passports immediately fueled speculation of foul play. However, Malaysian police chief Khalid Abu Bakar told a news conference Tuesday that investigators had determined one was a 19-year-old Iranian, Pouria Nourmohammadi Mehrdad, who was planning to enter Germany to seek asylum. "We believe he is not likely to be a member of any terrorist group," Khalid said. He said the young man's mother was waiting for him in Frankfurt and had been in contact with police. He said she contacted Malaysian authorities to inform them of her concern when her son didn't get in touch with her. He also said there was no truth to a statement by at least one other government official that five passengers had checked in for the flight but never boarded the airplane. The plane took off from Kuala Lumpur, on the western coast of Malaysia, early Saturday en route to Beijing. It flew across Malaysia into the Gulf of Thailand at 35,000 feet (11,000 meters) and then disappeared from radar screens. Authorities have said the plane may have attempted to turn back toward Kuala Lumpur. The hunt began on Saturday near the plane's last known location. But with no debris found there, the search has been systematically expanded to include areas the plane could have reached with the fuel it had on board. That is a vast area in which to locate something as small as a piece of an aircraft. Malaysia Airlines said search and rescue teams have expanded the scope beyond the flight path to the Straits of Malacca between Malaysia's western coast and Indonesia's Sumatra island — the opposite side of Malaysia from its last known location. An earlier statement said the western coast of Malaysia was "now the focus," but the airline subsequently said that phrase was an oversight. "The search is on both sides," Civil aviation chief Azharuddin Abdul Rahman said. The search currently includes nine aircraft and 24 ships from nine countries that have been scouring the Gulf of Thailand on the eastern side of Malaysia. Land areas also are being searched. China, where two-thirds of the passengers are from, urged Malaysian authorities on Tuesday to "speed up the efforts" to find the plane. It has sent four ships, with another four on the way. A shopping mall in Beijing suspended advertising on its large outdoor LED screen to display a search timer — an image of an airplane along with a digital clock marking the time since contact with the flight was lost. Assuming the plane crashed into the ocean or disintegrated in midair, there will likely still be debris floating in the ocean, but it may be widely spread out, and much may have already sunk. In past disasters, it has taken days or longer to find wreckage. The United States has sent two navy ships, at least one of which is equipped with helicopters, and a Navy P-3C Orion plane with sensors that can detect small debris in the water. It said in a statement that the Malaysian government has done "tremendous job" organizing the land and sea search effort. Vietnamese planes and ships are also taking part. Lt. Gen. Vo Van Tuan, deputy chief of staff of the Vietnamese People's Army, said authorities on land had also been ordered to search for the plane, which could have crashed into mountains or uninhabited jungle. He said military units near the border with Laos and Cambodia had been instructed to search their regions also. "So far we have found no signs ... so we must widen our search," he said. ___ Minh reported from Hanoi, Vietnam. Associated Press writers Jim Gomez and Eileen Ng in Kuala Lumpur and Chris Bodeen in Beijing contributed to this report. http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/international/asia/2014/03/man_with_stolen_passport_on_jet_was_asylum_seeker
|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:That's not racist at all :lol: A white guy with Ballotelli's haircut maybe? I'm reaching here.
|
|
|
Murfy1
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Quote:Kim Jong-un's 100% re-election reveals favoured names
Appearance of Choe Ryong-hae, the political chief of the military, ends speculation of his demise in North Korea
Reuters in Seoul
11 March 2014
North Korea has announced the winners of an election to its supreme people's assembly, including a senior army official whose re-election will dispel talk that he had been purged by leader Kim Jong-un.
Since Kim executed his powerful uncle Jang Song-thaek in December for treason, speculation has been rife that the young leader was running a ruthless campaign to purge the country's old elite.
Sunday vote was no contest, with one state-approved candidate for each of the 687 seats in an assembly that only sits a couple of times a year to rubberstamp decisions taken by the leadership.
The list of winners, however, did offer a glimpse of who was in favour, and who has lost out since the 31-year-old Kim succeeded his late father, Kim Jong-il in late 2011.
The re-election of Choe Ryong-hae, the political chief of the North's military, and the man generally considered only second in rank to Kim, laid to rest talk that he may have run foul of the young leader.
Kim's aunt, Kyong-hui, widow to the executed Jang and daughter of state founder Kim Il-sung, was also re-elected despite having been absent from public view since her husband's execution.
Her disappearance had sparked speculation that she may have been removed from the powerful ruling Workers' party politburo and stripped of other official posts following her husband's downfall.
For all the talk of a shakeup in the old guard and competing factions around Kim becoming destablising forces, the assembly election result appeared to herald little in the way of policy change.
A handful of officials who have appeared close to Kim, based on the North's official media coverage, were elected to the assembly for the first time, reflecting their rising stock.
Ma Won-chun, a vice-director of the secretive finance and accounting department in the ruling party (who according to South Korean experts, has long managed the North's money) was elected for the first time.
Jang Jong-nam, the armed forces minister and one of Kim's close aides, was also elected, along with Hwang Pyong-so, a deputy director of the party's powerful 'organisational guidance department'.
The North's official KCNA news agency reported an almost 100% turnout and said the chosen candidates received 100% support from voters.
"This is an expression of the absolute support and trust of all voters in the DPRK [Democratic People's Republic of Korea] government, the genuine people's power which serves the people and relies on them," KCNA said on Tuesday.
Kim's own election to the assembly was announced on Monday. The assembly convenes twice a year to formally approve the national budget and appointments of key personnel.
The South Korean government did not detect any great shifts, despite the prospect of some reshuffle in the North's bureaucracy following the assembly results.
"There are signs of some uncertainty in the longer term," Ryoo Kihl-jae, the South's top policymaker on ties with the North, told a forum on Tuesday. "But it's the [South Korean] government's view that there is no immediate sign of change." http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/11/kim-jong-un-100-percent-reelection-north-korea
|
|
|
Murfy1
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Quote:New Zealand to hold referendum on new, ‘post-colonial’ flag
Prime minister John Key, who favours a silver fern design, promises voters the chance to ‘acknowledge our independence’
Toby Manhire
11 March 2014
New Zealanders are to be given the chance to jettison the most visible remaining symbol of their colonial past in a referendum on changing the national flag.
In a speech in Wellington on Tuesday, the prime minister, John Key, promised a vote in the next parliamentary term on whether to keep the existing design, which features the union jack and four stars representing the southern cross, or replace it with an alternative, such as the silver fern on a black background or a version of the Maori koru.
Key, who personally favours the silver-fern-on-black option made famous by the All Black rugby side, said the time was ripe for “one more step in the evolution of modern New Zealand”. A change to the design of the flag, currently identical to the Australian banner apart from the number and style of stars, would show the country “acknowledging our independence”.
“It’s my belief, and I think one increasingly shared by many New Zealanders, that the design of the New Zealand flag symbolises a colonial and post-colonial era whose time has passed,” he said.
Key cited Canada’s shift in 1965, from a union jack adorned flag to a maple leaf symbol, as an example. “That old flag represented Canada as it was once, rather than as it is now. Similarly, I think our flag represents us as we were once, rather than as we are now.”
He pledged to work with all political parties to establish a working group that would in turn map out a process, which would very likely involve two separate plebiscites – to determine if a change was wanted and the preferred replacement.
Early indications from the main opposition leaders, who have criticised the prime minister’s past flirtations with a change in the flag as an attempt to distract attention from issues such as inequality, are that they will support the process outlined.
While republican groups welcome the change as part of a trend towards severing ties with the “mother country”, Key emphasised that he did not see it this way.
“We retain a strong and important constitutional link to the monarchy and I get no sense of any groundswell of support to let that go. Nor could we or would we dispose of the cultural legacy which gave us a proud democracy, a strong legal system and a rich artistic heritage,” he said.
“Our status as a constitutional monarchy continues to serve us well. It’s an arrangement that provides stability, continuity and keeps our head of state above party politics.”
Sean Palmer, chair of the lobby group Monarchy New Zealand, welcomed Key’s commitment to the Commonwealth, saying it was a mistake to “try to conflate the question of the flag and constitutional status”.
The majority of Commonwealth countries did not sport the union jack on their flags, he said, and there was no reason for Prince William and Catherine, who visit New Zealand next month, to regard the announcement as a snub.
A redesign is anything but inevitable, however. A Colmar Brunton poll for TVNZ last month found that just 28% of those who expressed an opinion wanted a fresh flag, with 72% preferring the status quo. In a similar poll in 2004, 42% wanted a change.
Key had previously hinted a referendum might be held in conjunction with the general election later this year, but instead has used the promise of a vote in the next term as his first gambit since the announcement of the election date earlier this week.
The election, in which Key’s National party hopes to win a third consecutive term, will be held on September 20, two months earlier than is usual, to provide sufficient time for any coalition talks ahead of the Brisbane G20 meetings and surrounding events in November, Key said. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/11/new-zealand-to-hold-referendum-on-new-post-colonial-flag
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Wow the Malaysian Air Force have tracked the aircraft down, it's in the completely wrong area and the transponder was off. Almost a U- turn.
|
|
|
Heineken
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K,
Visits: 0
|
Iridium1010 wrote:Wow the Malaysian Air Force have tracked the aircraft down, it's in the completely wrong area and the transponder was off. Almost a U- turn.
I don't think they've actually found the exact position of the plane, but it most certainly did fly off-target. What is now making it more suspicious is that it's taken about 5-days for the Malaysian military to come out with this information. Surely when the plane went missing on Saturday the Malaysian military would have come out immediately and been all "Oh, yeah, we kinda saw it on our radar, and it was going the complete opposite way it was meant too", instead of wasting time, and other countries military resources searching in the completely wrong area. What I also find suspicious, is that China yesterday was putting pressure on the Malay authorities to do more in the search, and now their military comes up with this? I've seen enough 'Air Crash Investigation/Mayday' episodes to know that a total loss in navigation tools would allow this to happen, but the fact the Malaysian military had it on it's radar screens for around an hour, makes it sound a little suspicious. I'm also struggling to believe, that if it did fly over the straight of Malacca, arguably one of the worlds busiest shipping lanes, that no ship or marine craft spotted it - especially if it were flying low. I don't buy into the theory that it crashed into the straight of Malacca either, for that exact reason, the Malacca straight is so busy, somebody would have come across the wreckage fairly quickly.
WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!

|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Look, the whole thing has sounded a bit strange to me from the beginning. Satellite technology can tell those who may be interested what you've had for breakfast this morning but can't find a missing plane? Come on.
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Edited by u4486662: 12/3/2014 09:33:15 PM
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Heineken wrote:Iridium1010 wrote:Wow the Malaysian Air Force have tracked the aircraft down, it's in the completely wrong area and the transponder was off. Almost a U- turn.
I don't think they've actually found the exact position of the plane, but it most certainly did fly off-target. What is now making it more suspicious is that it's taken about 5-days for the Malaysian military to come out with this information. Surely when the plane went missing on Saturday the Malaysian military would have come out immediately and been all "Oh, yeah, we kinda saw it on our radar, and it was going the complete opposite way it was meant too", instead of wasting time, and other countries military resources searching in the completely wrong area. What I also find suspicious, is that China yesterday was putting pressure on the Malay authorities to do more in the search, and now their military comes up with this? I've seen enough 'Air Crash Investigation/Mayday' episodes to know that a total loss in navigation tools would allow this to happen, but the fact the Malaysian military had it on it's radar screens for around an hour, makes it sound a little suspicious. I'm also struggling to believe, that if it did fly over the straight of Malacca, arguably one of the worlds busiest shipping lanes, that no ship or marine craft spotted it - especially if it were flying low. I don't buy into the theory that it crashed into the straight of Malacca either, for that exact reason, the Malacca straight is so busy, somebody would have come across the wreckage fairly quickly. no evidence merely a media fabrication the Malay Air Force have denied they've established the plane flew off course
|
|
|
zimbos_05
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
New theory coming out that there was a slow decompression of oxygen in the cabin. Caused by a crack by the fuselage. Apparently the decompression was too slow to notice and therefore the pilot or crew would not have reacted. As a result they could have all been incapacitated and the plane continued flying on autopilot and then when it ran out of fuel it dropped. Now the problem with this theory is that it means the plane would be someone past Beijing. As a result, the new reports of it near the Malacca would mean that there was some actual involvement in turning the plane off course. There is no chance auto-pilot would be able to change the course of the plane.
I also find the whole phone ringing interesting. If the plane was in the water, the phones would automatically stop working due to water damage and not ring. Any calls would go straight to voice mail. For a phone to ring, it needs to be near a phone tower or have some sort of phone coverage otherwise it would not ring. This would seem to discount it being in a jungle or in the ocean, and would seem to point to it being on land near some sort of phone coverage area.
Edited by zimbos_05: 12/3/2014 01:52:15 PM
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
the phone ringing thing has been debunked somewhere....something to do with the phone being out of range it will return a ring tone...cant remember the details
probably an attempt to get some advertising
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
zimbos_05 wrote:New theory coming out that there was a slow decompression of oxygen in the cabin. Caused by a crack by the fuselage. Apparently the decompression was too slow to notice and therefore the pilot or crew would not have reacted. As a result they could have all been incapacitated and the plane continued flying on autopilot and then when it ran out of fuel it dropped. Now the problem with this theory is that it means the plane would be someone past Beijing. As a result, the new reports of it near the Malacca would mean that there was some actual involvement in turning the plane off course. There is no chance auto-pilot would be able to change the course of the plane.
I also find the whole phone ringing interesting. If the plane was in the water, the phones would automatically stop working due to water damage and not ring. Any calls would go straight to voice mail. For a phone to ring, it needs to be near a phone tower or have some sort of phone coverage otherwise it would not ring. This would seem to discount it being in a jungle or in the ocean, and would seem to point to it being on land near some sort of phone coverage area.
Edited by zimbos_05: 12/3/2014 01:52:15 PM But didn't the plane disappear off the radar almost instantly? Indicating something rapid, as opposed to a plane running out of fuel and falling to the ground after a long period? I don't know much about planes other than that was my understanding.
|
|
|
zimbos_05
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:the phone ringing thing has been debunked somewhere....something to do with the phone being out of range it will return a ring tone...cant remember the details
probably an attempt to get some advertising I wasn't so sure on the phone ringing thing. I just read where they asked some Telco experts and they were saying that phones don't ring if they out of range, they go straight to voicemail or have that "I'm sorry, but the number you have dialled is currently unavailable" message. Everything is so sketchy. u4486662 wrote: But didn't the plane disappear off the radar almost instantly? Indicating something rapid, as opposed to a plane running out of fuel and falling to the ground after a long period?
I don't know much about planes other than that was my understanding.
That's the thing, how does a plane just disappear off the radar? Also, planes are built such that if there is an issue then the crew and pilots would have the opportunity to send a distress signal or try and rectify the problem. For it to have just vanished and so quickly, would suggest that something hectic would have had to have happen. I think normal airport radars don't detect planes under 30.000ft. But if the plane was on auto-pilot, it wouldn't have dropped so low I don't think. If it is something rapid, then it's pointing towards action that took place in the plane by one of the pilots or someone else, or that it was so hectic, then for the radar and plane to be completely knocked out, it is something unheard off in aviation history, almost drawing parallels to the rapidness of Hindenburg. I am no aviation expert, but there seems to be so many theories, and almost each theory has some plausibility, but then is also with flaws or more questions. It is all so sketchy, they really need to start being more clear on what's going on. With the amount of technology and manpower currently out there searching, I think this is turning in to some Amelia Earhart stuff. The waters there are much shallower than when the Air France plane went down, so to assume that we dealing with much deeper depths is I think out of the questions. Once again, not so sure.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
lol @ 'something hectic'
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
how does anyone know it dropped off the radar instantly. you didnt have access to the radar, you only saw a website called 'flightradar' which is notoriously inaccurate
there are radar blind spots all over the place
|
|
|
zimbos_05
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:lol @ 'something hectic' Hahaha, My zim slang coming through. I could have used Brobdingnagian ricecrackers wrote:how does anyone know it dropped off the radar instantly. you didnt have access to the radar, you only saw a website called 'flightradar' which is notoriously inaccurate
there are radar blind spots all over the place I wasn't going off flightradar. Was going off the reports coming through in which they say that both Beijing and Malysia flight control lost it on the radar.
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Murfy1 wrote:Quote:New Zealand to hold referendum on new, ‘post-colonial’ flag
Prime minister John Key, who favours a silver fern design, promises voters the chance to ‘acknowledge our independence’
Toby Manhire
11 March 2014
New Zealanders are to be given the chance to jettison the most visible remaining symbol of their colonial past in a referendum on changing the national flag.
In a speech in Wellington on Tuesday, the prime minister, John Key, promised a vote in the next parliamentary term on whether to keep the existing design, which features the union jack and four stars representing the southern cross, or replace it with an alternative, such as the silver fern on a black background or a version of the Maori koru.
Key, who personally favours the silver-fern-on-black option made famous by the All Black rugby side, said the time was ripe for “one more step in the evolution of modern New Zealand”. A change to the design of the flag, currently identical to the Australian banner apart from the number and style of stars, would show the country “acknowledging our independence”.
“It’s my belief, and I think one increasingly shared by many New Zealanders, that the design of the New Zealand flag symbolises a colonial and post-colonial era whose time has passed,” he said.
Key cited Canada’s shift in 1965, from a union jack adorned flag to a maple leaf symbol, as an example. “That old flag represented Canada as it was once, rather than as it is now. Similarly, I think our flag represents us as we were once, rather than as we are now.”
He pledged to work with all political parties to establish a working group that would in turn map out a process, which would very likely involve two separate plebiscites – to determine if a change was wanted and the preferred replacement.
Early indications from the main opposition leaders, who have criticised the prime minister’s past flirtations with a change in the flag as an attempt to distract attention from issues such as inequality, are that they will support the process outlined.
While republican groups welcome the change as part of a trend towards severing ties with the “mother country”, Key emphasised that he did not see it this way.
“We retain a strong and important constitutional link to the monarchy and I get no sense of any groundswell of support to let that go. Nor could we or would we dispose of the cultural legacy which gave us a proud democracy, a strong legal system and a rich artistic heritage,” he said.
“Our status as a constitutional monarchy continues to serve us well. It’s an arrangement that provides stability, continuity and keeps our head of state above party politics.”
Sean Palmer, chair of the lobby group Monarchy New Zealand, welcomed Key’s commitment to the Commonwealth, saying it was a mistake to “try to conflate the question of the flag and constitutional status”.
The majority of Commonwealth countries did not sport the union jack on their flags, he said, and there was no reason for Prince William and Catherine, who visit New Zealand next month, to regard the announcement as a snub.
A redesign is anything but inevitable, however. A Colmar Brunton poll for TVNZ last month found that just 28% of those who expressed an opinion wanted a fresh flag, with 72% preferring the status quo. In a similar poll in 2004, 42% wanted a change.
Key had previously hinted a referendum might be held in conjunction with the general election later this year, but instead has used the promise of a vote in the next term as his first gambit since the announcement of the election date earlier this week.
The election, in which Key’s National party hopes to win a third consecutive term, will be held on September 20, two months earlier than is usual, to provide sufficient time for any coalition talks ahead of the Brisbane G20 meetings and surrounding events in November, Key said. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/11/new-zealand-to-hold-referendum-on-new-post-colonial-flag
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
That flag actually looks pretty schmick.
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
This should be their flag.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
u4486662 wrote:This should be their flag.  No countries have black flags for a reason... Edited by afromanGT: 12/3/2014 09:49:17 PM
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
u4486662 wrote:This should be their flag.  Eh I'd keep that as sort of an unofficial sports flag or w.e.
|
|
|
Joffa
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K,
Visits: 0
|
Missing Malaysia Airlines plane: US issued warnings over Boeing 777s DateMarch 12, 2014 - 3:50PM 52 reading now Read later Tom Allard MH370 vanished from radar, then flew for an hour Confusion and disarray surrounds investigation The US airline safety regulator warned last year of cracking in the fuselage skin underneath a Boeing 777’s satellite antenna, issuing a worldwide alert for the flaw to be fixed as it could lead to decompression that would leave occupants unconscious. The problem identified by the US Federal Aviation Administration provides a possible explanation as to why a Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 plane mysteriously went missing en route to Beijing on Saturday. A structural failure related to the flaw could not only have led to a slow decompression that left the 239 passengers and crew on the missing flight unconscious, it would also have disabled satellite communications, including the Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS), which transmits data of the plane’s location automatically. It would also have rendered the plane invisible to all but 'primary radar', which has a range of only 100 nautical miles. Malaysia authorities are now saying the missing Malaysia Airlines plane flew for one hour and 10 minutes after Malaysian aviation authorities saw it vanish from radar over the South China Sea and potentially travel off course. According to a posting on the Professional Pilots Rumour Network, the end of satellite communications would not have disabled the mobile phone network on the plane, which runs off a different communications system. Nineteen families signed a statement saying they were able to telephone the mobile phones on the plane. While they got a dial tone, no one picked up. The posting theorises that a structural failure fitted with much of the information know so far about the disaster of Flight MH370. ‘‘A slow decompression (e.g. from a golfball-sized hole) would have gradually impaired and confused the pilots before cabin altitude (pressure) warnings sounded,’’ it said. ‘‘If the decompression was slow enough, it’s possible the pilots did not realize to put on oxygen masks until it was too late. [It] also explains why another pilot thirty minutes ahead heard “mumbling” from MH370 pilots. (VHF comms would be unaffected by SATCOM equipment failure.).’’ The theory of how the incident may have unfolded is speculative, but the directive from the US Federal Aviation Administration is fact. The 777-200 ER, the model operating flight MH370 was not specifically identified in the directive. An inspection of a 14 year old Boeing 777 owned by an unnamed airline uncovered a 16-inch crack, the FAA found. ‘‘We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain The Boeing Company Model 777 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a report of cracking in the fuselage skin underneath the satellite Communication (SATCOM) antenna adaptor. ‘‘This proposed AD would require repetitive inspections of the visible fuselage skin and doubler if installed, for cracking, corrosion, and any indication of contact of a certain fastener to a bonding jumper, and repair if necessary. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct cracking and corrosion in the fuselage skin, which could lead to rapid decompression and loss of structural integrity of the airplane.’’ The FAA directive called for additional checks to be incorporated into the routine maintenance schedule of the worldwide 777 Boeing fleet. The flaw was first identified on June 12, 2013. Comment was sought from airlines and the manufacturer by November but the final airworthiness directive was not issued by the FAA until February 18. According to a Malaysia Airlines spokesman, the missing aircraft was serviced on February 23, with further maintenance scheduled for June 19. Whether the directive was picked up by the airline remains unknown. A Boeing spokeswoman told Fairfax Media it was up to individual airlines to follow the directive, not the manufacturer. Despite both the Boeing 777 and Malaysia Airlines having good safety records, there have been other incidents which could prove relevant during the investigation of the disappearance. In 2005, a 777 operated by Malaysia Airlines suffered problems with its autopilot system on a flight between Perth and Kuala Lumpur. It led to the plane pitching up into a sudden 3000-foot climb, almost causing the plane to stall. The problem led to another airworthiness directive to correct a computer fault that had been found on 500 Boeing 777s. Airworthiness directives are commonplace, similar to car recalls. In the majority of cases, airlines are told to look for and correct the fault, if found, during maintenance. While investigators from Malaysia and the National Transportation Safety Board in Washington search for the plane's black box, they will also be able to glean vital information from a live-data stream broadcast during the flight. Known as Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System, it is the equivalent of an "online black box". However James Healy-Pratt, an aviation lawyer who has represented bereaved families in other air accidents, warned they face a long wait before the original black boxes are recovered. A Boeing spokesman said it was working with the NTSB as a technical adviser. "The team is now in position in the region to offer whatever assistance is required." The company declined to comment further. - with the Telegraph, London Ads by Google Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/world/missing-malaysia-airlines-plane-us-issued-warnings-over-boeing-777s-20140312-hvhqz.html#ixzz2vkLJH9LI
|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Iridium1010 wrote:Murfy1 wrote:Quote:New Zealand to hold referendum on new, ‘post-colonial’ flag
Prime minister John Key, who favours a silver fern design, promises voters the chance to ‘acknowledge our independence’
Toby Manhire
11 March 2014
New Zealanders are to be given the chance to jettison the most visible remaining symbol of their colonial past in a referendum on changing the national flag.
In a speech in Wellington on Tuesday, the prime minister, John Key, promised a vote in the next parliamentary term on whether to keep the existing design, which features the union jack and four stars representing the southern cross, or replace it with an alternative, such as the silver fern on a black background or a version of the Maori koru.
Key, who personally favours the silver-fern-on-black option made famous by the All Black rugby side, said the time was ripe for “one more step in the evolution of modern New Zealand”. A change to the design of the flag, currently identical to the Australian banner apart from the number and style of stars, would show the country “acknowledging our independence”.
“It’s my belief, and I think one increasingly shared by many New Zealanders, that the design of the New Zealand flag symbolises a colonial and post-colonial era whose time has passed,” he said.
Key cited Canada’s shift in 1965, from a union jack adorned flag to a maple leaf symbol, as an example. “That old flag represented Canada as it was once, rather than as it is now. Similarly, I think our flag represents us as we were once, rather than as we are now.”
He pledged to work with all political parties to establish a working group that would in turn map out a process, which would very likely involve two separate plebiscites – to determine if a change was wanted and the preferred replacement.
Early indications from the main opposition leaders, who have criticised the prime minister’s past flirtations with a change in the flag as an attempt to distract attention from issues such as inequality, are that they will support the process outlined.
While republican groups welcome the change as part of a trend towards severing ties with the “mother country”, Key emphasised that he did not see it this way.
“We retain a strong and important constitutional link to the monarchy and I get no sense of any groundswell of support to let that go. Nor could we or would we dispose of the cultural legacy which gave us a proud democracy, a strong legal system and a rich artistic heritage,” he said.
“Our status as a constitutional monarchy continues to serve us well. It’s an arrangement that provides stability, continuity and keeps our head of state above party politics.”
Sean Palmer, chair of the lobby group Monarchy New Zealand, welcomed Key’s commitment to the Commonwealth, saying it was a mistake to “try to conflate the question of the flag and constitutional status”.
The majority of Commonwealth countries did not sport the union jack on their flags, he said, and there was no reason for Prince William and Catherine, who visit New Zealand next month, to regard the announcement as a snub.
A redesign is anything but inevitable, however. A Colmar Brunton poll for TVNZ last month found that just 28% of those who expressed an opinion wanted a fresh flag, with 72% preferring the status quo. In a similar poll in 2004, 42% wanted a change.
Key had previously hinted a referendum might be held in conjunction with the general election later this year, but instead has used the promise of a vote in the next term as his first gambit since the announcement of the election date earlier this week.
The election, in which Key’s National party hopes to win a third consecutive term, will be held on September 20, two months earlier than is usual, to provide sufficient time for any coalition talks ahead of the Brisbane G20 meetings and surrounding events in November, Key said. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/11/new-zealand-to-hold-referendum-on-new-post-colonial-flag  Ever heard the "Tickle your arse with a feather?" joke? That's what it looks like.
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
:lol:
|
|
|