typical afrodope. cannot think for himself, therefore no sign of intelligence.
requires instruction from his BBC app to tell him what to think. may as well be a drone.

People post news articles. You post obscure blogs. And I'm the idiot. OK fuckwit.

i dont post obscure blogs
i was asked of an example of ABC propaganda bias
the link merely was an opinion with supporting evidence

let me ask you a simple question... who caused the "red line" sarin chemical attacks on civilians in Syria?
who did the ABC tell you it was?

So you were asked to provide example of ABC propaganda bias and now admit that you failed to do so, despite trumpeting your success previously.

answer the question afrodope this is completely relevant
if you cannot answer the question then we can only assume you're trying to weasel your way out again

This isn't relevant at all. You're just throwing up another pathetic straw man like you always do because you're an utter fucking moron.

its completely relevant because the "blog" post you refer to relates to the same conflict and ABC bias
i can see you're weaseling your way out again

typical slimy coward that you are

slither away now, off you go :-$

That blog piece makes no reference to chemical attacks. Ergo irrelevant.

Not to mention it's a complete load of nonsense. Yeah, how dare a group of journalists NOT get involved and sacrifice journalistic integrity in order to stop a situation which they are there to OBSERVE, not be involved in, from unfolding.

You're a complete asshat. The forum really would be better off without you. The whole of society would be.

EDIT: And let's not forget that the very article you posted with which to attack the ABC admits IN THE FIRST PARAGRAPH that it's not a slate on the ABC's reporting.

Edited by afromanGT: 21/5/2014 12:18:15 PM

no it doesnt make reference to chemical attacks because it was written a year before they occurred
it highlights ABC propaganda bias in beating war drums to remove Assad

now can you answer my question or not? I'm assuming not

....

omg you really are quite the moron afrodope
the article references a British documentary screened on the ABC's Four Corners, therefore of course its not local reporting
you're really getting quite desperate now pulling selective quotes out of context

So you admit that the article which you used to attack the ABC's integrity itself admits that it's not attacking the ABC's integrity. There was nothing quoted out of context, that WAS the context. The very first paragraph of the article SETS the context.

Ricecrackers;

and around and round we go with your idiocy again. you need to check yourself in

you dont even understand the context of the original discussion let alone the context of that article
you're simply looking for e-revenge after being exposed as a dope on numerous occasions

it was an example of Four Corners being full of shit you imbecile after screening another article on the missing plane
remember? that plane you were so sure they'd find near Perth almost 3 months ago?

and the burning nazi sympathiser returns

Your chums in Syria.



In Russia.

It can't be an example of Four Corners being full of shit when it clearly states that it wasn't a Four Corners story.

it was screened on Four Corners you mental case ](*,)

You do realise that the ABC is required to display a mandatory level of affiliate network content each week, right? And that Four Corners probably didn't have a choice in the story.

way to back pedal
you're mentally ill

Ricecrackers is schooled all over the shop, many posters show disdain for him.

Afroman is "mentally ill".

#ricecrackerslogic

you've been comprehensively and systemically owned (again)
i've wasted enough time on you already

Yup, everyone says you're wrong and I've been "owned".

grow up
listen to yourself. you sound like an 8 year old

Says the guy who hasn't made an intelligible post on the forums ever.

of course it excludes the USA
they're a competitor and chiefly responsible for security threats against Russia's gas pipeline assets

i don't see it as "scary", but i could see how

EDIT: that type of commentary isn't acceptable, please refrain from name calling, argue the issues but please don't 'attack the man' with those types of comments.

who swallows sensationalist news might get that impression

Edited by Joffa: 22/5/2014 09:45:59 PM

Prawncracker lost the plot once again.