The Aussies Abroad Thread


The Aussies Abroad Thread

Author
Message
Decentric
Decentric
Legend
Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)

Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K, Visits: 0
Frankfrank wrote:
Decentric wrote:
TheSelectFew wrote:
Kruse on the bench


Recently I've had a few second looks at the Asian Cup final.

It was fortuitous that Kruse was injured and the far more effective Troisi took over.

Kruse was completely outmuscled by the Korean defenders. I think Kruse has gone as far as he can in Germany. He probably needs to go to a lower level league and play more football on a weekly basis.

There are many Socceroos who have probably overtaken him now. Oar, Burns and Troisi are more complete players as wingers/wide players. Kruse plays well for the Socceroos against weaker international teams, but his weaknesses are exposed against better teams.


Burns, Troisi, Oar and Leckie in particular, all use their bodies better in physical duels.

Burns is probably a better dribbler.

Oar is a better crosser.

Troisi can also play as an attacking midfielder as well as a winger, and handles the rough stuff a lot better.

All have as good a technique as Kruse ( apart from Leckie). In Burns case he is better technically. Like Cahill and Kewell used to, as were Bresc and Kennedy, they look to the referee for a lot of support when roughed up. The likes of Leckie get stuck in instead of looking to the ref .

In the Asian Cup final Mark Milligan constantly won hard balls against the Koreans roughing Kruse up. Luongo held his own too.

If a player is brilliant technically, he doesn't need to have physical capabilities. But other than Rogic, no Aussie players are that that good. Rogic has a huge, muscular frame too, that is difficult to push off the ball.

Edited by Decentric: 16/8/2015 08:46:03 AM


That is the most rubbish I have heard on this forum. Kruse was unbelievable at the Asian cup for someone who didn't even play for 12 months . Obviously you have a grudge on kruse and you need to lower his very high standards by comparing them to troisi burns and leckie. There are know where near the level kruse is at. To be at Leverkusen you have to be pretty much a complete player. Even a squad player is a fantastic achievement. Something troisi burns ( who is playing at phenoix for Christ sake) and leckie oar would never achieve in there lives. As for being exposed by better teams. I have know idea how you come up with this shit. As kruse is the first name down on the national team. Comparing Milligan for winning hard challanges and kruse getting outmuscled just show how little you know about football. That is a ridiculous statement. You sir are an idiot.


Once again, you are evaluating players according to reputation of the club. One of our best players at the Asian Cup was Luongo. Yet he only plays in the modest League One, although just being promoted to the Championship.

Milligan, Spira, McKay also played very well in the Asian Cup, but only play in the HAL. Nathan Burns wasn't bad either.

I'm applying impartial, comprehensive football criteria in evaluating a player in a scenario which is equal to all . A few years ago, Kruse was close to our best player, but other players have improved more over the same period since, whilst he has been injured.

Another issue for Kruse, is he is fouled a lot. Game after game for the Socceroos he is hacked down. Yet there is a different ref every time, who doesn't see all the fouls from previous games.



Edited by Decentric: 17/8/2015 03:19:48 PM
Edited
9 Years Ago by Decentric
TheSelectFew
TheSelectFew
Legend
Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K, Visits: 0
Im a happy camper seeing koln putting 3 past Stuttgart. Hopefully it continues.

Tonight TSV play. Best of luck to Deggy.


Edited
9 Years Ago by TheSelectFew
Eastern Glory
Eastern Glory
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K, Visits: 0
Proud2BeCanberran wrote:
Scotch&Coke wrote:
The World game reporting that Sainsbury has injured his hamstring and will most likely miss our closest WCQ


Sainsbury and Good should be our long term centre defenders, but with the amount of injuries these two sustain, I can't say that looks likely.

Rhys Williams too should have been in that discussion but good grief, his body has been dismantled by injuries...

Sainsbury's body is not upto pro-football long term. Good is average at best, and has always been outplayed by Chapman at youth level. Good might become a Socceroos squadie, but we have better players.


Edited
9 Years Ago by Eastern Glory
TheSelectFew
TheSelectFew
Legend
Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)Legend (30K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K, Visits: 0
TheSelectFew wrote:
Im a happy camper seeing koln putting 3 past Stuttgart. Hopefully it continues.

Tonight TSV play. Best of luck to Deggy.
Osijek play Loco Zagreb. I bet the crozzie boys having a laugh at their possible future selections lol



Edited
9 Years Ago by TheSelectFew
Decentric
Decentric
Legend
Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)

Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K, Visits: 0
Frankfrank wrote:

As for being exposed by better teams. I have know idea how you come up with this shit. As kruse is the first name down on the national team. Comparing Milligan for winning hard challanges and kruse getting outmuscled just show how little you know about football. That is a ridiculous statement. You sir are an idiot.



When one looks at players using comprehensive criteria, one needs some in a team who are good ball winners. Preferably all 10 outfield players.

It is important to have players who are effective at disturbing opposition build ups. In any given game, a player only averages about 3 minutes on the ball. So what players do off it in the other 87 minutes is pretty important.

Edited
9 Years Ago by Decentric
Benjamin
Benjamin
Legend
Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K, Visits: 0
Decentric wrote:
Once again, you are evaluating players according to reputation of the club. One of our best players at the Asian Cup was Luongo. Yet he only plays in the modest League One.

Milligan, Spira, McKay also played very well in the Asian Cup, but only play in the HAL. Nathan Burns wasn't bad either.

Comparing players based on how they performed in a single tournament, at home, against generally poor opposition, is more an effective system of evaluation than looking at the standard of the clubs they are doing their daily job at.

I'm applying impartial, comprehensive football criteria in evaluating a player in a scenario which is equal to all . A few years ago, Kruse was close to our best player, but other players have improved more over the same period since, whilst he has been injured.

Another issue for Kruse, is he is fouled a lot. Game after game for the Socceroos he is hacked down. Yet there is a different ref every time, who doesn't see all the fouls from previous games.


The fact that he is fouled so much is the clearest indication for you of the danger which opposition coaches and players feel he poses.
Edited
9 Years Ago by Benjamin
Eastern Glory
Eastern Glory
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K, Visits: 0
Benjamin wrote:
Decentric wrote:
Once again, you are evaluating players according to reputation of the club. One of our best players at the Asian Cup was Luongo. Yet he only plays in the modest League One.

Milligan, Spira, McKay also played very well in the Asian Cup, but only play in the HAL. Nathan Burns wasn't bad either.

Comparing players based on how they performed in a single tournament, at home, against generally poor opposition, is more an effective system of evaluation than looking at the standard of the clubs they are doing their daily job at.

I'm applying impartial, comprehensive football criteria in evaluating a player in a scenario which is equal to all . A few years ago, Kruse was close to our best player, but other players have improved more over the same period since, whilst he has been injured.

Another issue for Kruse, is he is fouled a lot. Game after game for the Socceroos he is hacked down. Yet there is a different ref every time, who doesn't see all the fouls from previous games.


The fact that he is fouled so much is the clearest indication for you of the danger which opposition coaches and players feel he poses.

This. Always a useful stat.
Edited
9 Years Ago by Eastern Glory
Decentric
Decentric
Legend
Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)

Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K, Visits: 0
Benjamin wrote:
Decentric wrote:
Once again, you are evaluating players according to reputation of the club. One of our best players at the Asian Cup was Luongo. Yet he only plays in the modest League One.

Milligan, Spira, McKay also played very well in the Asian Cup, but only play in the HAL. Nathan Burns wasn't bad either.

Comparing players based on how they performed in a single tournament, at home, against generally poor opposition, is more an effective system of evaluation than looking at the standard of the clubs they are doing their daily job at.

I'm applying impartial, comprehensive football criteria in evaluating a player in a scenario which is equal to all . A few years ago, Kruse was close to our best player, but other players have improved more over the same period since, whilst he has been injured.

Another issue for Kruse, is he is fouled a lot. Game after game for the Socceroos he is hacked down. Yet there is a different ref every time, who doesn't see all the fouls from previous games.


The fact that he is fouled so much is the clearest indication for you of the danger which opposition coaches and players feel he poses.


These players have been effective in international football over more games than just the Asian Cup.

We can possibly also suggest, the Socceroos have played far higher international calibre opposition than most players and coaches experience as regulars in Championship and League One football.

Austrlaia has played Germany, Belgium, Spain, Holland, Chile, France, Brazil, Croatia, South Korea, Japan and Ecuador over the last few years. This is probably higher calibre opposition than almost any clubs in the world, other than the last 16 of the UEFA Champ League.

I'm not saying what you suggest is wrong, Benjmain, just another way of evaluating the quality of opposition the Socceroos have faced in international football.

I'd also back many of the teams in the Asian Cup to beat Championship teams if played in the heat and humidity of Asia too. The English teams would probably play in flat out mode, instead of subtle rhythm changes and run out of gas.

Most of these international teams are arguably at a far higher level than any English Lower League club. In fact most are better than anything in the EPL ouside the big five.

I'm not sure if you know him, but one Aussie based coach I know in EPL youth claims the English FA thinks football stops at the English Channel.:lol:
Edited
9 Years Ago by Decentric
tsf
tsf
Legend
Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K, Visits: 0
Decentric wrote:

Austrlaia has played Germany, Belgium, Spain, Holland, Chile, France, Brazil, Croatia, South Korea, Japan and Ecuador over the last few years.


Have they beaten any of them? Korea is the only one I can think of and that took two shots and extra time.
Edited
9 Years Ago by tsf
Benjamin
Benjamin
Legend
Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K, Visits: 0
So we're comparing how a player performs, and what he learns, from playing 5-6 games a year, rather than what a players learns and how he performs in 40 games a year and in training over that same time?
Edited
9 Years Ago by Benjamin
Decentric
Decentric
Legend
Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)

Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K, Visits: 0
lukerobinho wrote:
Decentric wrote:
TheSelectFew wrote:
Kruse on the bench


Recently I've had a few second looks at the Asian Cup final.

It was fortuitous that Kruse was injured and the far more effective Troisi took over.

Kruse was completely outmuscled by the Korean defenders. I think Kruse has gone as far as he can in Germany. He probably needs to go to a lower level league and play more football on a weekly basis.

There are many Socceroos who have probably overtaken him now. Oar, Burns and Troisi are more complete players as wingers/wide players. Kruse plays well for the Socceroos against weaker international teams, but his weaknesses are exposed against better teams.


Burns, Troisi, Oar and Leckie in particular, all use their bodies better in physical duels.

Burns is probably a better dribbler.

Oar is a better crosser.

Troisi can also play as an attacking midfielder as well as a winger, and handles the rough stuff a lot better.

All have as good a technique as Kruse ( apart from Leckie). In Burns case he is better technically. Like Cahill and Kewell used to, as were Bresc and Kennedy, they look to the referee for a lot of support when roughed up. The likes of Leckie get stuck in instead of looking to the ref .

In the Asian Cup final Mark Milligan constantly won hard balls against the Koreans roughing Kruse up. Luongo held his own too.

If a player is brilliant technically, he doesn't need to have physical capabilities. But other than Rogic, no Aussie players are that that good. Rogic has a huge, muscular frame too, that is difficult to push off the ball.

Edited by Decentric: 16/8/2015 08:46:03 AM


Not your finest moment decentric, Kruse makes some brilliant runs off the ball that are perhaps hard to quantify statistically and others in the Australian team struggle to replicate

He scored goals and won penalties in the Asian cup. Oar was useless(partly not his fault) at the AC and Burns has a habit of picking up the ball in non dangerous areas


You could be correct about the off the ball dummy running.

I'll look next time. It is very good for teammates when players do this.

Unfortunately though, Kruse was completely outmuscled in the final, even though he may have been more effective on other AC games.

I think ATM, it would be prudent for Kruse to play in a lower calibre league and get more game time, like Holland or Belgium.


Edited
9 Years Ago by Decentric
jlm8695
jlm8695
Legend
Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)Legend (19K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 19K, Visits: 0
Decentric, for someone who focuses so much on technique why is it so often that you think a player should be dropped/or replaced bases on poor phsyicality, rather than what they do with the ball.

Genuinely curious because you said the same things about Finkler that you did with Kruse when both are standout performers for the respective teams in question.

Edited by jlm8695: 17/8/2015 04:46:28 PM
Edited
9 Years Ago by jlm8695
Decentric
Decentric
Legend
Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)

Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K, Visits: 0
Benjamin wrote:
So we're comparing how a player performs, and what he learns, from playing 5-6 games a year, rather than what a players learns and how he performs in 40 games a year and in training over that same time?



Those international games are important to evaluate players. In the last few years, with Asian and World Cups, we must've played about 10-12 international games per year.

ACL games are also useful, as are UEFA CL games, to appraise players.

In some of those domestic leagues, some clubs, coaches and players never play against any international opposition.

Skill sets can be applicable to succeeding in a particular domestic league.

I'll give an example. In the Championship, the ball is in the transitions a lot.

Players are probably battling for second balls a lot more that in many other leagues. Some players battling for those second balls may not be their strong point, even though they may be reasonable footballers in other comps that do not require such a major emphasis on winning those second balls.

There are probably more high balls played in the Championship too. To be a good header of the ball is probably more important in the Championship than in most international games.

At the same time, you make a fair point that players play a lot more games in club football. In terms of suitable skill set for international football it can depend on which country and comp those club games are played.

Some Socceroos have said it has taken time to adjust from the style of football they play at club level compared to the Socceroo style.

Mainly countries outside Germany, Holland, Belgium. We don't have any in France and until now, Spain.
Edited
9 Years Ago by Decentric
Decentric
Decentric
Legend
Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)

Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K, Visits: 0
jlm8695 wrote:
Decentric, for someone who focuses so much on technique why is it so often that you think a player should be dropped/or replaced bases on poor phsyicality, rather than what they do with the ball.

Genuinely curious because you said the same things about Finkler that you did with Kruse when both are standout performers for the respective teams in question.

Edited by jlm8695: 17/8/2015 04:46:28 PM


Technique is paramount, but a player on average only has the ball in possession for 3 minutes a game. It is also very important what a player does off the ball too. What we want to produce is a combination of a Leckie off the ball, with a Rogic on it. This combo is probably a world class player.

I think in the HAL a lot of the star imported forwards and midfielders, are having the Aussie teammates do a lot of the donkey work, making them look better than they are. Aussie have been instilled with work ethic to make the first eleven.


Leckie is out most effective forward in the 87 minutes without the ball. In the 3 minutes he has the ball, he is probably less effective than any of our other forwards.
Edited
9 Years Ago by Decentric
Krusen
Krusen
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.5K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K, Visits: 0
Decentric wrote:
lukerobinho wrote:
Decentric wrote:
TheSelectFew wrote:
Kruse on the bench


Recently I've had a few second looks at the Asian Cup final.

It was fortuitous that Kruse was injured and the far more effective Troisi took over.

Kruse was completely outmuscled by the Korean defenders. I think Kruse has gone as far as he can in Germany. He probably needs to go to a lower level league and play more football on a weekly basis.

There are many Socceroos who have probably overtaken him now. Oar, Burns and Troisi are more complete players as wingers/wide players. Kruse plays well for the Socceroos against weaker international teams, but his weaknesses are exposed against better teams.


Burns, Troisi, Oar and Leckie in particular, all use their bodies better in physical duels.

Burns is probably a better dribbler.

Oar is a better crosser.

Troisi can also play as an attacking midfielder as well as a winger, and handles the rough stuff a lot better.

All have as good a technique as Kruse ( apart from Leckie). In Burns case he is better technically. Like Cahill and Kewell used to, as were Bresc and Kennedy, they look to the referee for a lot of support when roughed up. The likes of Leckie get stuck in instead of looking to the ref .

In the Asian Cup final Mark Milligan constantly won hard balls against the Koreans roughing Kruse up. Luongo held his own too.

If a player is brilliant technically, he doesn't need to have physical capabilities. But other than Rogic, no Aussie players are that that good. Rogic has a huge, muscular frame too, that is difficult to push off the ball.

Edited by Decentric: 16/8/2015 08:46:03 AM


Not your finest moment decentric, Kruse makes some brilliant runs off the ball that are perhaps hard to quantify statistically and others in the Australian team struggle to replicate

He scored goals and won penalties in the Asian cup. Oar was useless(partly not his fault) at the AC and Burns has a habit of picking up the ball in non dangerous areas


You could be correct about the off the ball dummy running.

I'll look next time. It is very good for teammates when players do this.

Unfortunately though, Kruse was completely outmuscled in the final, even though he may have been more effective on other AC games.

I think ATM, it would be prudent for Kruse to play in a lower calibre league and get more game time, like Holland or Belgium.



Why does Kruse have to go to a lower quality league where he will not be tested like he is in Bundesliga to play regular football? Have you seriously forgotten what he did in the Bundesliga with Fortuna?
Edited
9 Years Ago by Krusen
playmaker11
playmaker11
Legend
Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K, Visits: 0
moofa wrote:
johnszasz wrote:
Eastern Glory wrote:
playmaker11 wrote:
Duisburg are terrible.

I thought we'd already established that :lol:


They really are and all Holland bring is horizontal and back passing. The guy is extremely frustrating to watch. Never in a Roos shirt again.


I think he can play a role for a team screening the back four and giving simple passes to more creative players but when he doesn't have creative players around him or you need to push for a goal he is very uninspiring. I don't think we have a role in the socceroos for him especially in Asian Qualifiers but hopefully his club need for him to bring something else will inspire him to improve. The one way I could see him working for the national team is if we used wing-backs since our fullbacks can't defend anyway and Holland being part of the back 3 sitting slightly in front of the other two. I would probably rather Jedi or a good passing CB like Sainsbury over Holland even if we did try this formation though.

His passing stats for the game were:
98 touches - 91 attempted passes - 82 completed passes (90.1% completion)
While watching his passes will put you to sleep it is a good completion rate in a shit team.

The stats are from this article which calls him their "ballsicherste" which seems to be the safest player with the ball
http://www.derwesten.de/sport/fussball/msv/msv-duisburg-ballsicher-und-zweikampfschwach-id10995249.html


Seems pretty positive judging by the forums too. I didn't get to see the 2nd half when they got back to 2-2.

I just noticed Bielefeld is managed by Kruse's old coach.

By now, American Samoa must have realised that Australias 22-0 win over Tonga two days earlier was no fluke.

Edited
9 Years Ago by playmaker11
Decentric
Decentric
Legend
Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)

Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K, Visits: 0
Benjamin wrote:
So we're comparing how a player performs, and what he learns, from playing 5-6 games a year, rather than what a players learns and how he performs in 40 games a year and in training over that same time?


I didn't acknowledge this in an earlier response, Ben, but you have made a very sage point about evaluating a player over a sustained period of a season.=d>

From the perspective of a coach, though, we are constantly told by football boffins from the world powerhouses, that uniformity of curriculum is important. So where our players play their football in Europe is important.

It doesn't just extend to football, it also extends to teaching methodology. I'm hearing exactly the same message in my profession. In education, despite the misinformation in the media, Australia is a world leader, being ranked from 4th to 10th.
Edited
9 Years Ago by Decentric
Shatter
Shatter
Pro
Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)Pro (4.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.3K, Visits: 0
You know you're stretching for something positive to say when all you can find is that a player ran well without the ball. Kruse is okay enough but like most Australian forwards, massively overrated. I can understand the desperation to try and find positive talking points about the attacking prowess of Australian footballers, but the reality is that there's very little to go around relatively speaking.
Edited
9 Years Ago by Shatter
Decentric
Decentric
Legend
Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)

Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K, Visits: 0
jlm8695 wrote:
Decentric, for someone who focuses so much on technique why is it so often that you think a player should be dropped/or replaced bases on poor phsyicality, rather than what they do with the ball.

Genuinely curious because you said the same things about Finkler that you did with Kruse when both are standout performers for the respective teams in question.

Edited by jlm8695: 17/8/2015 04:46:28 PM


Like Benjamin, also a very good question, JLM.=d>

What we are looking for are complete players. Our closest are Milligan, Luongo, Mooy, Sainsbury, Spira, Holland and Troisi. All are effective distributors and ball winners. Berisha and Broich are also a more all round forwards than many of the other imported players in the HAL.

My comments on Finkler certainly upset other Victory fans.

Recently cricketer Ryan Harris retired. He made a sage comment. He claims that most on he other side of the fence, rank players as unequivocally great or terrible. I think this extends to football too.

There is very little difference between players at Socceroo level according to coaches. Fans think differently.

Edited by Decentric: 17/8/2015 07:13:42 PM
Edited
9 Years Ago by Decentric
Decentric
Decentric
Legend
Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)

Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K, Visits: 0
Krusen wrote:
Decentric wrote:
lukerobinho wrote:
Decentric wrote:
TheSelectFew wrote:
Kruse on the bench


Recently I've had a few second looks at the Asian Cup final.

It was fortuitous that Kruse was injured and the far more effective Troisi took over.

Kruse was completely outmuscled by the Korean defenders. I think Kruse has gone as far as he can in Germany. He probably needs to go to a lower level league and play more football on a weekly basis.

There are many Socceroos who have probably overtaken him now. Oar, Burns and Troisi are more complete players as wingers/wide players. Kruse plays well for the Socceroos against weaker international teams, but his weaknesses are exposed against better teams.


Burns, Troisi, Oar and Leckie in particular, all use their bodies better in physical duels.

Burns is probably a better dribbler.

Oar is a better crosser.

Troisi can also play as an attacking midfielder as well as a winger, and handles the rough stuff a lot better.

All have as good a technique as Kruse ( apart from Leckie). In Burns case he is better technically. Like Cahill and Kewell used to, as were Bresc and Kennedy, they look to the referee for a lot of support when roughed up. The likes of Leckie get stuck in instead of looking to the ref .

In the Asian Cup final Mark Milligan constantly won hard balls against the Koreans roughing Kruse up. Luongo held his own too.

If a player is brilliant technically, he doesn't need to have physical capabilities. But other than Rogic, no Aussie players are that that good. Rogic has a huge, muscular frame too, that is difficult to push off the ball.

Edited by Decentric: 16/8/2015 08:46:03 AM


Not your finest moment decentric, Kruse makes some brilliant runs off the ball that are perhaps hard to quantify statistically and others in the Australian team struggle to replicate

He scored goals and won penalties in the Asian cup. Oar was useless(partly not his fault) at the AC and Burns has a habit of picking up the ball in non dangerous areas


You could be correct about the off the ball dummy running.

I'll look next time. It is very good for teammates when players do this.

Unfortunately though, Kruse was completely outmuscled in the final, even though he may have been more effective on other AC games.

I think ATM, it would be prudent for Kruse to play in a lower calibre league and get more game time, like Holland or Belgium.



Why does Kruse have to go to a lower quality league where he will not be tested like he is in Bundesliga to play regular football? Have you seriously forgotten what he did in the Bundesliga with Fortuna?


Because by playing regularly, and being a major player in a coach's game plans, it is far better for development than coming off the bench for short periods, or even worse, not getting a run at all. If Kruse becomes a regular, great.

Given his lack of tenacity in winning hard balls, low physical and core strength, I think his incomplete skill set is not good enough for a regular in the upper echelons of the Bundesliga. I hope he proves me wrong and plays regularly .
Edited
9 Years Ago by Decentric
grazorblade
grazorblade
Legend
Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K, Visits: 0
When kruse plays with a good through ball specialist he looks like scoring every couple of minutes in the bundesliga

He has very good timing in his runs behind

He is one of the more clever players i have seen using his moderate skillset to frequently create something from nothing
Edited
9 Years Ago by grazorblade
Decentric
Decentric
Legend
Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)

Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K, Visits: 0
playmaker11 wrote:
moofa wrote:
johnszasz wrote:
Eastern Glory wrote:
playmaker11 wrote:
Duisburg are terrible.

I thought we'd already established that :lol:


They really are and all Holland bring is horizontal and back passing. The guy is extremely frustrating to watch. Never in a Roos shirt again.


I think he can play a role for a team screening the back four and giving simple passes to more creative players but when he doesn't have creative players around him or you need to push for a goal he is very uninspiring. I don't think we have a role in the socceroos for him especially in Asian Qualifiers but hopefully his club need for him to bring something else will inspire him to improve. The one way I could see him working for the national team is if we used wing-backs since our fullbacks can't defend anyway and Holland being part of the back 3 sitting slightly in front of the other two. I would probably rather Jedi or a good passing CB like Sainsbury over Holland even if we did try this formation though.

His passing stats for the game were:
98 touches - 91 attempted passes - 82 completed passes (90.1% completion)
While watching his passes will put you to sleep it is a good completion rate in a shit team.

The stats are from this article which calls him their "ballsicherste" which seems to be the safest player with the ball
http://www.derwesten.de/sport/fussball/msv/msv-duisburg-ballsicher-und-zweikampfschwach-id10995249.html


Seems pretty positive judging by the forums too. I didn't get to see the 2nd half when they got back to 2-2.

I just noticed Bielefeld is managed by Kruse's old coach.


I can pontificate on Holland.

For the Roos he was a good distributor, and passed quite accurately.

It is important to note, and this was emphatically laid down by the esteemed Dutch KNVB coaches, that the onus on opening passing lanes, is the movement of other players off the ball . If Holland doesn't have players opening passing lanes in front of him, his passing options may be limited to sideways and backwards.

Holland has better ability than most other central midfielders, to take his first touch forwards in an attacking sense.

He was also a good ball winner.

I'm astonished Ange dropped him.
Edited
9 Years Ago by Decentric
grazorblade
grazorblade
Legend
Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K, Visits: 0
It is very hard to come back from an acl injury
Players can take up to 2 years before they get back to where they were and that is if they get game time under his belt

Look at sarota. Was a standout before he did his acl. Comes back and cant get a game in the eredivisie or the a league
Edited
9 Years Ago by grazorblade
Union Aristocrat
Union Aristocrat
Weekender
Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 37, Visits: 0
I think Australian soccer players should think more seriously about moving to Francophone Europe. The culture and lifestyle is much more suited to a relaxed state of mind and involves less physical pressure. The language is also quite simple to get a hold of.
Edited
9 Years Ago by Union Aristocrat
Decentric
Decentric
Legend
Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)

Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K, Visits: 0
grazorblade wrote:
When kruse plays with a good through ball specialist he looks like scoring every couple of minutes in the bundesliga

He has very good timing in his runs behind

He is one of the more clever players i have seen using his moderate skillset to frequently create something from nothing


I haven't seen him play in the Bundesliga.

It is as high a quality league as any in the world. It is a very elite league.
Edited
9 Years Ago by Decentric
Decentric
Decentric
Legend
Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)Legend (23K reputation)

Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K, Visits: 0
Union Aristocrat wrote:
I think Australian soccer players should think more seriously about moving to Francophone Europe. The culture and lifestyle is much more suited to a relaxed state of mind and involves less physical pressure. The language is also quite simple to get a hold of.


Welcome to the forum.

I won't hold your politics against you.:lol:
Edited
9 Years Ago by Decentric
Union Aristocrat
Union Aristocrat
Weekender
Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 37, Visits: 0
Decentric wrote:
Union Aristocrat wrote:
I think Australian soccer players should think more seriously about moving to Francophone Europe. The culture and lifestyle is much more suited to a relaxed state of mind and involves less physical pressure. The language is also quite simple to get a hold of.


Welcome to the forum.

I won't hold your politics against you.:lol:


Thank you Decentric. I have been reading this forum for the past week and there seems to be a bit of nonsense going on along with far too images posted in threads for my liking, but I'm glad to be here.
Edited
9 Years Ago by Union Aristocrat
Heineken
Heineken
Legend
Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K, Visits: 0
Union Aristocrat wrote:
Decentric wrote:
Union Aristocrat wrote:
I think Australian soccer players should think more seriously about moving to Francophone Europe. The culture and lifestyle is much more suited to a relaxed state of mind and involves less physical pressure. The language is also quite simple to get a hold of.


Welcome to the forum.

I won't hold your politics against you.:lol:


Thank you Decentric. I have been reading this forum for the past week and there seems to be a bit of nonsense going on along with far too images posted in threads for my liking, but I'm glad to be here.



WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!

Edited
9 Years Ago by Heineken
Union Aristocrat
Union Aristocrat
Weekender
Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)Weekender (37 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 37, Visits: 0
I refuse to give that post, or you Heineken, the dignity of quoting that disgusting post. Have some respect.
Edited
9 Years Ago by Union Aristocrat
Heineken
Heineken
Legend
Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)Legend (50K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K, Visits: 0
Union Aristocrat wrote:
I refuse to give that post, or you Heineken, the dignity of quoting that disgusting post. Have some respect.



WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!

Edited
9 Years Ago by Heineken
GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search