Should the State governing bodies be private companies or should they be more of a democratic nature with the stake holders having more say in the running of the game in their State.

Football Queensland have to be worse guardians of the game , far worse than some of the blazers and comb overs running the game in England.

They look after their own interests enough to warrant us calling them private business already.

Tony Dunkerly (former FFV Chairman) lost his position for proposing such a case with the FFV.

The question is who is issued shares? And how many shares can one entity have?

I thought after the Crawford report I would have more of a say, like a vote.

There already like private companies.

How do you think selections are made for rep teams...

Selections are made by politics and have been for years throughout NSW. Same as NSW 1st and 2nd tier clubs do.

The talented will always get nowhere in this sport unless they are politically well adjusted.

It makes no difference at the end of day. Same shit, different people doing the same thing for decades.

How depressingly true.

Who'd buy shares in a company that budgeted for a profit of $350-400k, but will instead post a loss of about $400k?