mahony wrote:Priest wrote:Awesome. Tell us about how it's got no chance of going to the supreme court again because there is no case against the FFV :lol: I said it was "unlikely" (I see no substantive point of law but a magistrate still may), and the plaintiffs are further away from the Supreme Court today than they were when I said this. Regardless, my character assessment of you remains and is demonstrated further with every post you make. Oh damn, my character is in question :cry: :lol: Yep my assessment of you also remains and is demonstrated further with every post you make too (that's why it's in bold). Seems you know better than the lawyer :lol: Probably should have got you to represent the zone reps #-o You really are a clown. The bottom line is you do not understand what is happening. It is beyond you. Your don’t have the knowledge to engage with the detail. Give it away. The adults are talking.
|