afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:thupercoach wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:rusty wrote:thupercoach wrote:afromanGT wrote:thupercoach wrote:Right wing people tend to take risks by starting and running businesses. Left wing people tend to work in safe, cushy jobs. #-o And theeeeeeere we have it. Exactly why simplistic generalisations are ridiculous. You do have to admit though that the public sector tends to vote left while the business sector tends to vote right. Right wing people also tend to be better at sports and getting laid, whereas left wing are more concerned with social issues, fairness and solving sudoku puzzles. I'm all of those things. -PB You poor, confused bastard. You're not my real dad. -PB
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
thupercoach wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:rusty wrote:thupercoach wrote:afromanGT wrote:thupercoach wrote:Right wing people tend to take risks by starting and running businesses. Left wing people tend to work in safe, cushy jobs. #-o And theeeeeeere we have it. Exactly why simplistic generalisations are ridiculous. You do have to admit though that the public sector tends to vote left while the business sector tends to vote right. Right wing people also tend to be better at sports and getting laid, whereas left wing are more concerned with social issues, fairness and solving sudoku puzzles. I'm all of those things. -PB You poor, confused bastard. You're not my real dad. -PB
|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:rusty wrote:thupercoach wrote:afromanGT wrote:thupercoach wrote:Right wing people tend to take risks by starting and running businesses. Left wing people tend to work in safe, cushy jobs. #-o And theeeeeeere we have it. Exactly why simplistic generalisations are ridiculous. You do have to admit though that the public sector tends to vote left while the business sector tends to vote right. Right wing people also tend to be better at sports and getting laid, whereas left wing are more concerned with social issues, fairness and solving sudoku puzzles. I'm all of those things. -PB You poor, confused bastard.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:thupercoach wrote:afromanGT wrote:thupercoach wrote:Right wing people tend to take risks by starting and running businesses. Left wing people tend to work in safe, cushy jobs. #-o And theeeeeeere we have it. Exactly why simplistic generalisations are ridiculous. You do have to admit though that the public sector tends to vote left while the business sector tends to vote right. Right wing people also tend to be better at sports and getting laid, whereas left wing are more concerned with social issues, fairness and solving sudoku puzzles. I'm all of those things. -PB
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
ozboy wrote:afromanGT wrote:ozboy wrote:afromanGT wrote:ozboy wrote:afromanGT wrote:Oh look, an ozboy thread belittling right wing ideologists. Science is a bitch, ain't it? Enhanced Amygdala activity can also correlate with increased sexual behaviour or thoughts, or with stronger or more aggressive responses to stimulus. It's not exclusive to fear. Selective reasoning is a bitch, ain't it? Amygdala volume correlates positively with fearfulness in normal healthy girls Research into the neural underpinnings of fear and fear-related pathology has highlighted the role of the amygdala. For instance, bilateral damage to the amygdaloid complex is associated with decreased appreciation of danger and recognition of fear in humans, whereas enlarged amygdala volume is associated with internalizing syndromes. It is unknown whether amygdala volume and fearfulness are related in the absence of pathology. We examined the correlation between normal fearfulness and amygdala morphology in 116 healthy children and adolescents (60 boys, 56 girls, age 7–17 years). Fearfulness was measured using the parent ratings on the Pediatric Behavior Scale and amygdala volumes were determined by manual tracing. We found a positive correlation between right amygdala volume in girls (r = 0.29). This relationship was more robust and present bilaterally when analyses were limited to girls with a positive nuclear family history of depression (for left r = 0.63; for right r = 0.58). In boys there was no significant relationship which may suggest that biological mechanisms differ between sexes. Given the role of enlarged amygdala volume in pathology, these findings may indicate that variation in amygdala morphology marks susceptibility to internalizing disorders. http://scan.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2010/02/11/scan.nsq009 The Role of the Central Nucleus of the Amygdala in Mediating Fear and Anxiety in the Primate This study doesn't allow for the Amygdala's other stimulus responses. It's only concerned with fear and therefore is a biased result. Numerous studies demonstrate that the rhesus monkey is an excellent species with which to investigate mechanisms underlying human emotion and psychopathology. To examine the role of the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) in mediating the behavioral and physiological responses associated with fear and anxiety, we used rhesus monkeys to assess the effects of excitotoxic lesions of the CeA. Behavioral and physiological responses of nine monkeys with bilateral CeA destruction (ranging from 46 to 98%) were compared with five animals with asymmetric lesions (42-86.5% destruction on the most affected side) and with 16 unoperated controls. Results suggest that similar to rodent species, the primate CeA plays a role in mediating fear- and anxiety-related behavioral and endocrine responses. Compared with controls and the asymmetric-lesion group, bilaterally lesioned monkeys displayed significantly less fear-related behavior when exposed to a snake and less freezing behavior when confronted by a human intruder. In addition, bilaterally lesioned monkeys had decreased levels of CSF corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF), and both lesioned groups had decreased plasma ACTH concentrations. In contrast to these findings, patterns of asymmetric frontal brain electrical activity, as assessed by regional scalp EEG, did not significantly differ between control and lesioned monkeys. These findings suggest that in primates, the CeA is involved in mediating fear- and anxiety-related behavioral and pituitary-adrenal responses as well as in modulating brain CRF activity. http://www.jneurosci.org/content/24/24/5506 Monkeys are fiscal conservatives. Got it!
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
ozboy wrote:sydneyfc1987 wrote:God I hate left-minded ideology sometimes. So smug and pretentious.
"Well I have a PHD political anthropology so I'm going to use it to prove that people who don't share my political views are genetically inferior"
'Stahp Ze Bowts' really is the height of intellectual policy. Not that the government was feeding on fear response.... What does that have to do with anything? Both sides of politics are equally guilty of using cheap, shitty slogans such as this.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
thupercoach wrote:afromanGT wrote:thupercoach wrote:afromanGT wrote:thupercoach wrote:Right wing people tend to take risks by starting and running businesses. Left wing people tend to work in safe, cushy jobs. #-o And theeeeeeere we have it. Exactly why simplistic generalisations are ridiculous. You do have to admit though that the public sector tends to vote left while the business sector tends to vote right. The business sector votes right because they fund their policies and campaigns. It's self-serving. That's just a handful of business leaders, a drop I the bucket. I'm talking small business owners and self-funded retirees. Also doesn't explain why Canberra votes labor en masse as does the teaching and academic sector. Not at all, local MP's turn to local businesses to fund their campaigns. All 3 of my bosses voted Labor.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:thupercoach wrote:afromanGT wrote:thupercoach wrote:Right wing people tend to take risks by starting and running businesses. Left wing people tend to work in safe, cushy jobs. #-o And theeeeeeere we have it. Exactly why simplistic generalisations are ridiculous. You do have to admit though that the public sector tends to vote left while the business sector tends to vote right. The business sector votes right because they fund their policies and campaigns. It's self-serving. All voting is self serving. The left votes to fund their idea they are morally and intellectually better than other people.
|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:thupercoach wrote:afromanGT wrote:thupercoach wrote:Right wing people tend to take risks by starting and running businesses. Left wing people tend to work in safe, cushy jobs. #-o And theeeeeeere we have it. Exactly why simplistic generalisations are ridiculous. You do have to admit though that the public sector tends to vote left while the business sector tends to vote right. The business sector votes right because they fund their policies and campaigns. It's self-serving. That's just a handful of business leaders, a drop I the bucket. I'm talking small business owners and self-funded retirees. Also doesn't explain why Canberra votes labor en masse as does the teaching and academic sector.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
thupercoach wrote:afromanGT wrote:thupercoach wrote:Right wing people tend to take risks by starting and running businesses. Left wing people tend to work in safe, cushy jobs. #-o And theeeeeeere we have it. Exactly why simplistic generalisations are ridiculous. You do have to admit though that the public sector tends to vote left while the business sector tends to vote right. Right wing people also tend to be better at sports and getting laid, whereas left wing are more concerned with social issues, fairness and solving sudoku puzzles.
|
|
|
ozboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:Ozboy you keep changing the goalposts and bringing up irrelevant shit.
The point is: The experiment set out to prove that the enlarged Amygdala caused a stronger fear response but didn't explore other emotive responses to stimulus. If it doesn't explore whether the response to positive stimulus is equally as heightened then you're fitting your results to your hypothesis instead of the other way around. The Automatic Conservative: Ideology-Based Attentional Asymmetries in the Processing of Valenced Information Abstract Research has widely explored the differences between conservatives and liberals, and it has been also recently demonstrated that conservatives display different reactions toward valenced stimuli. However, previous studies have not yet fully illuminated the cognitive underpinnings of these differences. In the current work, we argued that political ideology is related to selective attention processes, so that negative stimuli are more likely to automatically grab the attention of conservatives as compared to liberals. In Experiment 1, we demonstrated that negative (vs. positive) information impaired the performance of conservatives, more than liberals, in an Emotional Stroop Task. This finding was confirmed in Experiment 2 and in Experiment 3 employing a Dot-Probe Task, demonstrating that threatening stimuli were more likely to attract the attention of conservatives. Overall, results support the conclusion that people embracing conservative views of the world display an automatic selective attention for negative stimuli. http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0026456
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
thupercoach wrote:afromanGT wrote:thupercoach wrote:Right wing people tend to take risks by starting and running businesses. Left wing people tend to work in safe, cushy jobs. #-o And theeeeeeere we have it. Exactly why simplistic generalisations are ridiculous. You do have to admit though that the public sector tends to vote left while the business sector tends to vote right. The business sector votes right because they fund their policies and campaigns. It's self-serving.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
thupercoach wrote:afromanGT wrote:thupercoach wrote:Right wing people tend to take risks by starting and running businesses. Left wing people tend to work in safe, cushy jobs. #-o And theeeeeeere we have it. Exactly why simplistic generalisations are ridiculous. You do have to admit though that the public sector tends to vote left while the business sector tends to vote right. Has nothing to do at all with the business sector and their pressures on politicians in right-wing parties? -PB
|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:thupercoach wrote:Right wing people tend to take risks by starting and running businesses. Left wing people tend to work in safe, cushy jobs. #-o And theeeeeeere we have it. Exactly why simplistic generalisations are ridiculous. You do have to admit though that the public sector tends to vote left while the business sector tends to vote right.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
thupercoach wrote:Right wing people tend to take risks by starting and running businesses. Left wing people tend to work in safe, cushy jobs. #-o
|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:thupercoach wrote:God the left is up itself. Fancy calling themselves "progressive".
They think they are the repository of goodness while the Right is just evil corporates exploiting people.
Talk about post-Industrial Revolution thinking. Don't you mean the suppository of all wisdom? :lol: Shove it up your arse mate.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
thupercoach wrote:Right wing people tend to take risks by starting and running businesses. Left wing people tend to work in safe, cushy jobs.
Usually people who run businesses end up moving further to the economic right.
The whole premise of the study is ridiculous.
|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Right wing people tend to take risks by starting and running businesses. Left wing people tend to work in safe, cushy jobs.
Usually people who run businesses end up moving further to the economic right.
The whole premise of the study is ridiculous.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
Ozboy you keep changing the goalposts and bringing up irrelevant shit.
The point is: The experiment set out to prove that the enlarged Amygdala caused a stronger fear response but didn't explore other emotive responses to stimulus. If it doesn't explore whether the response to positive stimulus is equally as heightened then you're fitting your results to your hypothesis instead of the other way around.
|
|
|
ozboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:ozboy wrote:afromanGT wrote:ozboy wrote:afromanGT wrote:Oh look, an ozboy thread belittling right wing ideologists. Science is a bitch, ain't it? Enhanced Amygdala activity can also correlate with increased sexual behaviour or thoughts, or with stronger or more aggressive responses to stimulus. It's not exclusive to fear. Selective reasoning is a bitch, ain't it? Amygdala volume correlates positively with fearfulness in normal healthy girls Research into the neural underpinnings of fear and fear-related pathology has highlighted the role of the amygdala. For instance, bilateral damage to the amygdaloid complex is associated with decreased appreciation of danger and recognition of fear in humans, whereas enlarged amygdala volume is associated with internalizing syndromes. It is unknown whether amygdala volume and fearfulness are related in the absence of pathology. We examined the correlation between normal fearfulness and amygdala morphology in 116 healthy children and adolescents (60 boys, 56 girls, age 7–17 years). Fearfulness was measured using the parent ratings on the Pediatric Behavior Scale and amygdala volumes were determined by manual tracing. We found a positive correlation between right amygdala volume in girls (r = 0.29). This relationship was more robust and present bilaterally when analyses were limited to girls with a positive nuclear family history of depression (for left r = 0.63; for right r = 0.58). In boys there was no significant relationship which may suggest that biological mechanisms differ between sexes. Given the role of enlarged amygdala volume in pathology, these findings may indicate that variation in amygdala morphology marks susceptibility to internalizing disorders. http://scan.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2010/02/11/scan.nsq009 The Role of the Central Nucleus of the Amygdala in Mediating Fear and Anxiety in the Primate This study doesn't allow for the Amygdala's other stimulus responses. It's only concerned with fear and therefore is a biased result. Numerous studies demonstrate that the rhesus monkey is an excellent species with which to investigate mechanisms underlying human emotion and psychopathology. To examine the role of the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) in mediating the behavioral and physiological responses associated with fear and anxiety, we used rhesus monkeys to assess the effects of excitotoxic lesions of the CeA. Behavioral and physiological responses of nine monkeys with bilateral CeA destruction (ranging from 46 to 98%) were compared with five animals with asymmetric lesions (42-86.5% destruction on the most affected side) and with 16 unoperated controls. Results suggest that similar to rodent species, the primate CeA plays a role in mediating fear- and anxiety-related behavioral and endocrine responses. Compared with controls and the asymmetric-lesion group, bilaterally lesioned monkeys displayed significantly less fear-related behavior when exposed to a snake and less freezing behavior when confronted by a human intruder. In addition, bilaterally lesioned monkeys had decreased levels of CSF corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF), and both lesioned groups had decreased plasma ACTH concentrations. In contrast to these findings, patterns of asymmetric frontal brain electrical activity, as assessed by regional scalp EEG, did not significantly differ between control and lesioned monkeys. These findings suggest that in primates, the CeA is involved in mediating fear- and anxiety-related behavioral and pituitary-adrenal responses as well as in modulating brain CRF activity. http://www.jneurosci.org/content/24/24/5506
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:thupercoach wrote:God the left is up itself. Fancy calling themselves "progressive".
They think they are the repository of goodness while the Right is just evil corporates exploiting people.
Talk about post-Industrial Revolution thinking. Don't you mean the suppository of all wisdom? :lol: Yes I think that's what he means.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
thupercoach wrote:God the left is up itself. Fancy calling themselves "progressive".
They think they are the repository of goodness while the Right is just evil corporates exploiting people.
Talk about post-Industrial Revolution thinking. Don't you mean the suppository of all wisdom? :lol:
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
thupercoach wrote: They think they are the repository of goodness while the Right is just evil corporates exploiting people.
Biting the hand that feeds them really. I'm pretty sure it's envy, they despise the wealthy but want it so bad, they can't have it so they complain.
|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
God the left is up itself. Fancy calling themselves "progressive".
They think they are the repository of goodness while the Right is just evil corporates exploiting people.
Talk about post-Industrial Revolution thinking.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
ozboy wrote:afromanGT wrote:ozboy wrote:afromanGT wrote:Oh look, an ozboy thread belittling right wing ideologists. Science is a bitch, ain't it? Enhanced Amygdala activity can also correlate with increased sexual behaviour or thoughts, or with stronger or more aggressive responses to stimulus. It's not exclusive to fear. Selective reasoning is a bitch, ain't it? Amygdala volume correlates positively with fearfulness in normal healthy girls Research into the neural underpinnings of fear and fear-related pathology has highlighted the role of the amygdala. For instance, bilateral damage to the amygdaloid complex is associated with decreased appreciation of danger and recognition of fear in humans, whereas enlarged amygdala volume is associated with internalizing syndromes. It is unknown whether amygdala volume and fearfulness are related in the absence of pathology. We examined the correlation between normal fearfulness and amygdala morphology in 116 healthy children and adolescents (60 boys, 56 girls, age 7–17 years). Fearfulness was measured using the parent ratings on the Pediatric Behavior Scale and amygdala volumes were determined by manual tracing. We found a positive correlation between right amygdala volume in girls (r = 0.29). This relationship was more robust and present bilaterally when analyses were limited to girls with a positive nuclear family history of depression (for left r = 0.63; for right r = 0.58). In boys there was no significant relationship which may suggest that biological mechanisms differ between sexes. Given the role of enlarged amygdala volume in pathology, these findings may indicate that variation in amygdala morphology marks susceptibility to internalizing disorders. http://scan.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2010/02/11/scan.nsq009 This study doesn't allow for the Amygdala's other stimulus responses. It's only concerned with fear and therefore is a biased result.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:rusty wrote:If liberals are so smart why aren't they intelligent enough to hold onto power?
Edited by rusty: 11/9/2013 02:49:51 PM Because they have to rely on the intelligence of the masses. And the masses are stupid. If they have to rely on the intelligence of the masses and the masses are stupid, how do they get into power?
|
|
|
ozboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneyfc1987 wrote:God I hate left-minded ideology sometimes. So smug and pretentious.
"Well I have a PHD political anthropology so I'm going to use it to prove that people who don't share my political views are genetically inferior"
'Stahp Ze Bowts' really is the height of intellectual policy. Not that the government was feeding on fear response....
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:If liberals are so smart why aren't they intelligent enough to hold onto power?
Edited by rusty: 11/9/2013 02:49:51 PM Because they have to rely on the intelligence of the masses. And the masses are stupid.
|
|
|
ozboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:ozboy wrote:afromanGT wrote:Oh look, an ozboy thread belittling right wing ideologists. Science is a bitch, ain't it? Enhanced Amygdala activity can also correlate with increased sexual behaviour or thoughts, or with stronger or more aggressive responses to stimulus. It's not exclusive to fear. Selective reasoning is a bitch, ain't it? Amygdala volume correlates positively with fearfulness in normal healthy girls Research into the neural underpinnings of fear and fear-related pathology has highlighted the role of the amygdala. For instance, bilateral damage to the amygdaloid complex is associated with decreased appreciation of danger and recognition of fear in humans, whereas enlarged amygdala volume is associated with internalizing syndromes. It is unknown whether amygdala volume and fearfulness are related in the absence of pathology. We examined the correlation between normal fearfulness and amygdala morphology in 116 healthy children and adolescents (60 boys, 56 girls, age 7–17 years). Fearfulness was measured using the parent ratings on the Pediatric Behavior Scale and amygdala volumes were determined by manual tracing. We found a positive correlation between right amygdala volume in girls (r = 0.29). This relationship was more robust and present bilaterally when analyses were limited to girls with a positive nuclear family history of depression (for left r = 0.63; for right r = 0.58). In boys there was no significant relationship which may suggest that biological mechanisms differ between sexes. Given the role of enlarged amygdala volume in pathology, these findings may indicate that variation in amygdala morphology marks susceptibility to internalizing disorders. http://scan.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2010/02/11/scan.nsq009
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
If liberals are so smart why aren't they intelligent enough to hold onto power?
Edited by rusty: 11/9/2013 02:49:51 PM
|
|
|