Battle for Internet Oversight Authority: Clinton Upset, Wants US Control


Battle for Internet Oversight Authority: Clinton Upset, Wants US...

Author
Message
thupercoach
thupercoach
World Class
World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K, Visits: 0
If you've got control of it, why the hell would you want to give up a massive advantage like that??!!

I think Obama and Kerry share an IQ.

And you thought Carter weakened America...

Edited by thupercoach: 25/3/2014 05:26:47 PM
WaMackie
WaMackie
Pro
Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)Pro (3.1K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3K, Visits: 0

Can an IT buff here explain this please?

Quote:
Count former President Bill Clinton among those who are skeptical of the new Obama administration plan to give up Internet oversight authority.

At a weekend meeting sponsored by the Clinton Global Initiative, the former president talked in detail about why the U.S. should retain oversight over Internet domain names and addresses.

Noting that Edward Snowden's revelations of National Security Agency data collections have given "new energy" to the belief that the U.S. should not even be in "nominal control of domain names," Clinton argued that the U.S. has still done a pretty good job of keeping the Internet open and free.
Re/code has the whole story.

(Read more: Should you worry about the US giving up the Internet?)

—By Amy Schatz, Re/code.net.

CNBC's parent NBC Universal is an investor in Re/code's parent Revere Digital, and the companies have a content-sharing arrangement.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/101519240


Quote:
http://recode.net/2014/03/14/u-s-to-give-up-key-internet-governance-role/

PolicyU.S. to Give Up Key Internet Governance Role
March 14, 2014, 6:53 PM PDT
By Amy Schatz


Obama administration officials moved late Friday to end the U.S.’s role in overseeing Internet domain names and addresses, announcing plans to relinquish its role by the end of next year and turning the keys over to the global Internet community.

Commerce department officials announced that the U.S. government would relinquish its role overseeing Internet addresses in favor of a to-be-determined global body.

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers has managed the use and governance of domain names and Internet addresses for the U.S. government since 1998, when it was awarded the task by the Commerce Department. Based in Los Angeles, ICANN oversees the Internet’s address system and has moved in recent years to open up new domain names.

U.S. officials originally proposed easing out of their oversight function in 1997. That move was opposed by some companies and users concerned about such key Internet functions being taken over by the United Nations or countries like China, which restrict access to information online.

The Obama administration’s move is likely to rile conservatives who have previously expressed concerns about allowing the Internet to be more heavily influenced by foreign governments or controlled by the United Nations. Former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich immediately blasted the move on Twitter, saying, “Every American should worry about Obama giving up control of the internet to an undefined group. This is very, very dangerous.”

U.S. officials didn’t say why they were taking the step now, but they have faced increasing pressure to give up their Internet oversight role in the wake of continuing revelations about the National Security Agency’s mass global Internet surveillance operations.

“We look forward to ICANN convening stakeholders across the global Internet community to craft an appropriate transition plan,” said Commerce Department Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information Lawrence E. Strickling, in a statement.

ICANN president Fadi Chehadé applauded the move and said the organization would invite “governments, the private sector, civil society, and other Internet organizations from the whole world to join us in developing this transition process.”

Commerce Department officials indicated that they wouldn’t give up oversight of ICANN to another government or “inter-governmental organization,” which would include the United Nations.

Whoever takes over would be required to maintain the security and stability of the Internet domain name system, meet the needs of global customers and “maintain the openness of the Internet,” according to a Commerce Department statement.

Many tech companies have been frustrated by the U.S. intelligence community’s surveillance activities, and a few weighed in with cautious support of the plan Friday evening.

Vint Cerf, Google’s Chief Internet Evangelist and a former member of ICANN’s board, said in a statement that “the Internet was built to be borderless and this move toward a more multistakeholder model of governance creates an opportunity to preserve its security, stability and openness.”

Yahoo released a statement that it was committed to keeping the Internet secure, open and free. “A more multi-stakeholder, bottom-up governance structure as outlined by the [Commerce Department] will help all parties reach this goal,” a Yahoo spokeswoman said.

Meanwhile, Internet provider AT&T Inc. said in a blog post that it supports the effort and believes it will lead “to even more thoughtful discussions” about how to ensure a stable, secure open Internet. But the company added that “we are not kidding ourselves about how important and challenging this task will be.”



GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search