|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:StiflersMom wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:How does building a mosque lead to sharia law ???? There is a lot of misconceptions out there . And stiflersmom for someone as reasonable as you I would've thought you would he more careful in pedaling hate . But I guess muslims =terrorists . Not peddling any hate, as I mentioned, its Topical ATM, so lets get it out there. I have Islamic workmates, I play soccer with the cleric from the GC mosque, can't say they join me for a beer, we do go to lunch at work though, and have no problem with them. anyway ANDREW JEFFERSON wrote:The Bendigo council received 432 objections to the construction of the mosque, the majority relating to concerns over the influence of Islam, the threat of terrorism, the introduction of Sharia Law, and the dilution of Christian values. http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/interstate-mosque-critic-wont-come-to-bendigo/story-fni0fit3-1226966811196 One thing the article didn't mention is that nearly all of the planning objections came from outside the Bendigo area, ie: Bigots are mobile. The guy at the beginning is not a bigot, he has a Thai wife :lol: Just because there were more objections than support doesn't mean anything either. I think I read a survey said that suggested that the majority of the population were indifferent to it.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:The guy at the beginning is not a bigot, he has a Thai wife :lol:
Just because there were more objections than support doesn't mean anything either. I think I read a survey said that suggested that the majority of the population were indifferent to it. I don't think that having a Thai wife necessarily immunises against bigotry :lol:
|
|
|
|
|
StiflersMom
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:StiflersMom wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:How does building a mosque lead to sharia law ???? There is a lot of misconceptions out there . And stiflersmom for someone as reasonable as you I would've thought you would he more careful in pedaling hate . But I guess muslims =terrorists . Not peddling any hate, as I mentioned, its Topical ATM, so lets get it out there. I have Islamic workmates, I play soccer with the cleric from the GC mosque, can't say they join me for a beer, we do go to lunch at work though, and have no problem with them. anyway ANDREW JEFFERSON wrote:The Bendigo council received 432 objections to the construction of the mosque, the majority relating to concerns over the influence of Islam, the threat of terrorism, the introduction of Sharia Law, and the dilution of Christian values. http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/interstate-mosque-critic-wont-come-to-bendigo/story-fni0fit3-1226966811196 What is your actual problem with a mosque being built? If it's because you're worried about the supposed influence of islam then I genuinely feel sorry for you :lol: What if someone were to raise the same concerns over the influence of Christianity with a church being built? StiflersMom wrote: Personally, anything that threatens mine and my families freedom and quality of life should fought with the highest aggression factor.
And for the record I am not racist, I am against religion, it has done nothing for this world but cause problems. /rant (for now)
Let me be clear, all Religions, but especially that which expect the whole world should be believers, or else. People can have their own ideas about whatever and are free to do so, that's fine, don't force it on me.
|
|
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
StiflersMom wrote:sydneycroatia58 wrote:StiflersMom wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:How does building a mosque lead to sharia law ???? There is a lot of misconceptions out there . And stiflersmom for someone as reasonable as you I would've thought you would he more careful in pedaling hate . But I guess muslims =terrorists . Not peddling any hate, as I mentioned, its Topical ATM, so lets get it out there. I have Islamic workmates, I play soccer with the cleric from the GC mosque, can't say they join me for a beer, we do go to lunch at work though, and have no problem with them. anyway ANDREW JEFFERSON wrote:The Bendigo council received 432 objections to the construction of the mosque, the majority relating to concerns over the influence of Islam, the threat of terrorism, the introduction of Sharia Law, and the dilution of Christian values. http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/interstate-mosque-critic-wont-come-to-bendigo/story-fni0fit3-1226966811196 What is your actual problem with a mosque being built? If it's because you're worried about the supposed influence of islam then I genuinely feel sorry for you :lol: What if someone were to raise the same concerns over the influence of Christianity with a church being built? StiflersMom wrote: Personally, anything that threatens mine and my families freedom and quality of life should fought with the highest aggression factor.
And for the record I am not racist, I am against religion, it has done nothing for this world but cause problems. /rant (for now)
Let me be clear, all Religions, but especially that which expect the whole world should be believers, or else. People can have their own ideas about whatever and are free to do so, that's fine, don't force it on me. I just don't see how the building of a mosque threatens you or your families freedom. It's not like you're being forced to convert to Islam. I might be wrong but I cannot recall anyone's freedom or quality of life being threatened by the building of a mosque. The building of a mosque impinges on your freedom and quality of life no more than the building of a catholic or orthodox church does, but for some reason I don't think you'd be on here complaining about a church being built nearby.
|
|
|
|
|
StiflersMom
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:StiflersMom wrote:sydneycroatia58 wrote:StiflersMom wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:How does building a mosque lead to sharia law ???? There is a lot of misconceptions out there . And stiflersmom for someone as reasonable as you I would've thought you would he more careful in pedaling hate . But I guess muslims =terrorists . Not peddling any hate, as I mentioned, its Topical ATM, so lets get it out there. I have Islamic workmates, I play soccer with the cleric from the GC mosque, can't say they join me for a beer, we do go to lunch at work though, and have no problem with them. anyway ANDREW JEFFERSON wrote:The Bendigo council received 432 objections to the construction of the mosque, the majority relating to concerns over the influence of Islam, the threat of terrorism, the introduction of Sharia Law, and the dilution of Christian values. http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/interstate-mosque-critic-wont-come-to-bendigo/story-fni0fit3-1226966811196 What is your actual problem with a mosque being built? If it's because you're worried about the supposed influence of islam then I genuinely feel sorry for you :lol: What if someone were to raise the same concerns over the influence of Christianity with a church being built? StiflersMom wrote: Personally, anything that threatens mine and my families freedom and quality of life should fought with the highest aggression factor.
And for the record I am not racist, I am against religion, it has done nothing for this world but cause problems. /rant (for now)
Let me be clear, all Religions, but especially that which expect the whole world should be believers, or else. People can have their own ideas about whatever and are free to do so, that's fine, don't force it on me. I just don't see how the building of a mosque threatens you or your families freedom. It's not like you're being forced to convert to Islam. I might be wrong but I cannot recall anyone's freedom or quality of life being threatened by the building of a mosque. The building of a mosque impinges on your freedom and quality of life no more than the building of a catholic or orthodox church does, but for some reason I don't think you'd be on here complaining about a church being built nearby. Mate, not even going to start this.
|
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Noone is forcing their beliefs on anyone .
|
|
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
I tell you, the 200-odd muslims out there protesting literally hours after the raids have occurred aren't exactly helping. By protesting they are essentially declaring their support toward those targeted and arrested. All it does is foster the already-present dichotomy between Muslims and the rest of the country.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneyfc1987 wrote:I tell you, the 200-odd muslims out there protesting literally hours after the raids have occurred aren't exactly helping. By protesting they are essentially declaring their support toward those targeted and arrested. All it does is foster the already-present dichotomy between Muslims and the rest of the country. Presuming they are all innocent until proven guilty, why wouldn't they support those arrested... especially considering that most have now been released without charge? It appears, quite literally, that they were targeted for nothing other than the fact that they are Muslims.
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:sydneyfc1987 wrote:I tell you, the 200-odd muslims out there protesting literally hours after the raids have occurred aren't exactly helping. By protesting they are essentially declaring their support toward those targeted and arrested. All it does is foster the already-present dichotomy between Muslims and the rest of the country. Presuming they are all innocent until proven guilty, why wouldn't they support those arrested... especially considering that most have now been released without charge? It appears, quite literally, that they were targeted for nothing other than the fact that they are Muslims. Courier Mail front page today was pretty gold.  -PB
|
|
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:sydneyfc1987 wrote:I tell you, the 200-odd muslims out there protesting literally hours after the raids have occurred aren't exactly helping. By protesting they are essentially declaring their support toward those targeted and arrested. All it does is foster the already-present dichotomy between Muslims and the rest of the country. Presuming they are all innocent until proven guilty, why wouldn't they support those arrested... especially considering that most have now been released without charge? It appears, quite literally, that they were targeted for nothing other than the fact that they are Muslims. So do you know in bold is the facts ?!
Love Football
|
|
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
M.L. wrote:notorganic wrote:sydneyfc1987 wrote:I tell you, the 200-odd muslims out there protesting literally hours after the raids have occurred aren't exactly helping. By protesting they are essentially declaring their support toward those targeted and arrested. All it does is foster the already-present dichotomy between Muslims and the rest of the country. Presuming they are all innocent until proven guilty, why wouldn't they support those arrested... especially considering that most have now been released without charge? It appears, quite literally, that they were targeted for nothing other than the fact that they are Muslims. So do you know in bold is the facts ?! No, that's why I said "it appears"
|
|
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
https://theconversation.com/islamic-state-wants-australians-to-attack-muslims-terror-expert-31845Quote:It’s in the interests of Islamic State for Muslims in Australia to be attacked or for their mosques to be attacked, because doing so would help divide the Australian community. But we should be very clear: the only people who win if Australia is divided are the extremists.
The new allegations of a plot to kidnap and behead Australians as a way of supporting the Islamic State didn’t surprise me, because there was a similar plot in the UK about seven years ago. In that UK case, it was a plot to kidnap, torture and behead a British Muslim soldier, film it, and put it on the internet. Fortunately that never happened, because the men plotting that UK murder were caught.
I haven’t personally seen any signs of an anti-Muslim backlash in Australia in response to today’s raids and the allegations that have gone before the courts. But you could expect to see some kind of reaction if an attack took place in Australia. That’s certainly what happened in the UK after the so-called “7/7” London bombings.
I worked as a police officer with Scotland Yard for about 30 years, including as the head of international counter-terrorism intelligence at New Scotland Yard. Then I came to Australia in 2003 as the UK’s regional counter-terrorism liaison officer, and more recently joined Charles Sturt University. While I was at Scotland Yard, we had a unit that specifically dealt with Muslim community and worked on building that relationship.
But we found that the most effective form of good policing happened at an individual community level: having police officers on the ground, at local stations, involved with and knowing the Islamic community, and making sure that senior members of the community knew that should anything happen – such as an attack on a mosque – that the police would take that seriously.
It’s very important to remember, whether here in Australia or overseas – it’s only a tiny minority of the Muslim community that are ever involved in any kind of extreme action. The vast majority are decent, ordinary people, who shouldn’t be attacked, and who should feel as respected and protected as any other member of the community.
To non-Muslim Australians, I’d say that if they have a mosque or an Islamic centre in their area, they can help guard against potential backlash by keeping an eye out for their neighbours. If they see someone who looks like they might be doing the wrong thing [such as recent reports of anti-Muslim leaflets and pig bodies left at a Logan mosque, south of Brisbane], instead of ignoring it, they should get on the phone and tell the police.
And it’s really important for police to protect the Islamic community. If they don’t, there’s a risk that people will feel isolated and that’s not in Australia’s best interests.
As for Islamic State, if they or their sympathisers can arrange a situation where we see parts of the Australian community pitted against each other, then that’s exactly what they want. That’s the kind of situation that breeds more sympathy for their cause, so that disenchanted young people end up either going overseas or else taking actions in their own countries.
|
|
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:M.L. wrote:notorganic wrote:sydneyfc1987 wrote:I tell you, the 200-odd muslims out there protesting literally hours after the raids have occurred aren't exactly helping. By protesting they are essentially declaring their support toward those targeted and arrested. All it does is foster the already-present dichotomy between Muslims and the rest of the country. Presuming they are all innocent until proven guilty, why wouldn't they support those arrested... especially considering that most have now been released without charge? It appears, quite literally, that they were targeted for nothing other than the fact that they are Muslims. So do you know in bold is the facts ?! No, that's why I said "it appears" Well "it appears" does cover your quote but I doubt very much the AFP/ASIO etc would go to all the trouble with some 800 authorities involved targetted these people just on the base's being Muslim. Your article above has alot of merit - do you not think local police everywhere in Australia where neccessary have made sure to involve themselves around these communities for years encouraging relationships amongst each other knowing there is always the small % who screw it up for the good people no matter what colour/religion......
Love Football
|
|
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
M.L. wrote:notorganic wrote:M.L. wrote:notorganic wrote:sydneyfc1987 wrote:I tell you, the 200-odd muslims out there protesting literally hours after the raids have occurred aren't exactly helping. By protesting they are essentially declaring their support toward those targeted and arrested. All it does is foster the already-present dichotomy between Muslims and the rest of the country. Presuming they are all innocent until proven guilty, why wouldn't they support those arrested... especially considering that most have now been released without charge? It appears, quite literally, that they were targeted for nothing other than the fact that they are Muslims. So do you know in bold is the facts ?! No, that's why I said "it appears" Well "it appears" does cover your quote but I doubt very much the AFP/ASIO etc would go to all the trouble with some 800 authorities involved targetted these people just on the base's being Muslim. Wouldn't be the first time for ASIO with certain nationalities/ethnic groups.
|
|
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote:M.L. wrote:notorganic wrote:M.L. wrote:notorganic wrote:sydneyfc1987 wrote:I tell you, the 200-odd muslims out there protesting literally hours after the raids have occurred aren't exactly helping. By protesting they are essentially declaring their support toward those targeted and arrested. All it does is foster the already-present dichotomy between Muslims and the rest of the country. Presuming they are all innocent until proven guilty, why wouldn't they support those arrested... especially considering that most have now been released without charge? It appears, quite literally, that they were targeted for nothing other than the fact that they are Muslims. So do you know in bold is the facts ?! No, that's why I said "it appears" Well "it appears" does cover your quote but I doubt very much the AFP/ASIO etc would go to all the trouble with some 800 authorities involved targetted these people just on the base's being Muslim. Wouldn't be the first time for ASIO with certain nationalities/ethnic groups. No problem to many citizens I'm sure on that count, better uncover suspect rocks than not at all - IF they are innocent obviously freed, sure they are not happy having gone through the rigger but better sure than not, obviously there is reason to check. No system is perfect there will always be errors and always exposed by those undesirables as well but I'm sure most citizens like me are satisfied our secruity people are being pro active than not.
Love Football
|
|
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
Yeah I'm sure that's what these people are thinking as their doors are kicked in at 4am "Yeah nah it's alright better to be safe than sorry"
My dad still has problems when going for job interviews when they find out he was on an ASIO watchlist for years simply because he was part of a Croatian youth group.
|
|
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Yes your right - AFP/ASIO should call and make an appointment - its the polite thing to do. I'm sorry for your Dad, at times the sytem sucks - in my youth I hung around with the local wrong people for a short period of time, learnt my lesson very quick keep right away for the mud sticks.......
Love Football
|
|
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Apparently, the attacks were imminent(within a few days).
|
|
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
M.L. wrote:obviously there is reason to check. Such as?
|
|
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:M.L. wrote:obviously there is reason to check. Such as? Good question tell us ? I'll tell you, you or I won't know the real facts but I won't waste the time of our people questioning their actions.
Love Football
|
|
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:sydneyfc1987 wrote:I tell you, the 200-odd muslims out there protesting literally hours after the raids have occurred aren't exactly helping. By protesting they are essentially declaring their support toward those targeted and arrested. All it does is foster the already-present dichotomy between Muslims and the rest of the country. Presuming they are all innocent until proven guilty, why wouldn't they support those arrested... especially considering that most have now been released without charge? It appears, quite literally, that they were targeted for nothing other than the fact that they are Muslims. It amazes me that you could come to such a conclusion so readily. My original point was based on the premise that nobody, other than ASIO/Police and those arrested, knows exactly why the raids were conducted. I can't help but feel people that share your opinion carry their own agenda based on universal condemnation of the current federal government.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
|
|
Eastern Glory
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K,
Visits: 0
|
Iridium1010 wrote:Polemides wrote:^ Let it be known that Christian Lebanese are a persecuted minority just like most/all Christians in the middle east.
Good luck finding Lebanese Christians involved in crime in Australia, this barely occurs. All the trouble makers are muslim, it is a part of their culture.
There was a stupid propaganda program on sbs recently titled "Once upon a time in Punchbowl". They mislead the public by presenting Lebanese muslim crimes and problems whilst showing images of Lebanese Christians going to church and the odd mosque here and there. The truth is, the muslims exclusively are the source of all the problems within south west Sydney. While I did notice that documentary focused mainly on muslims, ignoring that the majority of Lebanese in Australia are Christian, I disagree with "it's only muslims who are involved in crime", two of the arguably most infamous Lebanese-Australian gangsters are Christian, Michael Kaanan and Danny Karam. Christian Lebanese by culture. Means nothing really.
|
|
|
|
|
Cromulent
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 814,
Visits: 0
|
sydneycroatia58 wrote: My dad still has problems when going for job interviews when they find out he was on an ASIO watchlist for years simply because he was part of a Croatian youth group.
The RBB?
|
|
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Iridium1010 wrote:Apparently, the attacks were imminent(within a few days). correct....i was tipped off on Thursday last week to be cautious and stay away from large crowds, one tip was the Sydney marathon was going to be targeted for a mass shooting by one of these nut jobs, along with the army barracks located throughout sydney
|
|
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Eastern Glory wrote:Iridium1010 wrote:Polemides wrote:^ Let it be known that Christian Lebanese are a persecuted minority just like most/all Christians in the middle east.
Good luck finding Lebanese Christians involved in crime in Australia, this barely occurs. All the trouble makers are muslim, it is a part of their culture.
There was a stupid propaganda program on sbs recently titled "Once upon a time in Punchbowl". They mislead the public by presenting Lebanese muslim crimes and problems whilst showing images of Lebanese Christians going to church and the odd mosque here and there. The truth is, the muslims exclusively are the source of all the problems within south west Sydney. While I did notice that documentary focused mainly on muslims, ignoring that the majority of Lebanese in Australia are Christian, I disagree with "it's only muslims who are involved in crime", two of the arguably most infamous Lebanese-Australian gangsters are Christian, Michael Kaanan and Danny Karam. Christian Lebanese by culture. Means nothing really. Pretty sure that Kaanan's family was deeply religious and he went to a christian school, and continued to be religious, and I'm pretty sure that Danny Karam, fought in the Lebanese Civil war, on the Christian side. Either way that's not the point of the post. Edited by iridium1010: 19/9/2014 03:46:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
SlyGoat36
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K,
Visits: 0
|
You're damned if you do and damned if you don't.
They just wouldn't raid a bunch of random Muslims, I feel a bit safer knowing the cops aren't as spineless as some of the hipster flogs here.
|
|
|
|
|
Eastern Glory
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K,
Visits: 0
|
SlyGoat36 wrote:You're damned if you do and damned if you don't.
They just wouldn't raid a bunch of random Muslims, I feel a bit safer knowing the cops aren't as spineless as some of the hipster flogs here. Pro-active policing is necessary whether we like it or not. That's a the reality.
|
|
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
SlyGoat36 wrote:You're damned if you do and damned if you don't.
They just wouldn't raid a bunch of random Muslims, I feel a bit safer knowing the cops aren't as spineless as some of the hipster flogs here. with you there sly baby.....;)
|
|
|
|
|
zimbos_05
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
It has been interesting sitting back, reading this thread. On to the topic. I for one do not support any extreme action from any religion. If those arrested can be proven guilty without doubt that they were in fact plotting a terrorist attack, then lock them away, and punish them. Shariah Law has no place in Australia. It's quite simple. This is the Islamic view on the matter. If any Muslim is trying to implement Shariah Law in Australia, then they are already breaking the rules of Shariah Law, and can quite frankly leave. Stop calling these people Jihadists. For the millionth time, Jihad does not mean holy war, it means struggle. And not a struggle like a battle, but a struggle like, 'I struggle to wake up in the morning'. IS, and ISIS do not have any basis in Islam. They do not represent Islam because THEY ARE NOT ISLAM. Muslim leaders and communities have spoken out against them. We do not support them. We have questions about them that probably should be raised on a wider level, but on the whole we do not support them or recognise them. Once again, they are not Islam. Anybody living in a free and democratic society yet harbours ill feeling towards their government, and plots terrorist attacks, regardless of their religion, deserves to be locked and punished. I know some of the people who were arrested in Brisbane personally. I have visited that book shop. It was a non for profit bookshop. I will not lie, I did have my concerns about some of the potential paths it could have taken, but fortunately did not see it go down that path. Arrests such as these, particularly if there is a false or evidence lacking base, only serve to alienate and divide the wider Australian community. The new terror laws that are to be voted on, I have dealt with them personally before I left. I can guarantee you that most of it was aimed towards the Muslim community. I had police commissioners and police officers confirm this to me in person. There is a real concern among them regarding IS and ISIS and the potential threats in Australia. Their stance is to go hardcore before something happens. They have plans to CCTV mosques, 'plant' people within mosques who will serve as information gatherers. These were all plans laid out to myself and other members of the community who met with the QPS. Once again, I do not support any terrorist act of any person regardless of their religion. If you have hate towards to the Australian government, and that hate is of a terrorist nature, then leave the country. You have been welcomed here with open arms, and given the opportunity to practice your religion in freedom, you have no base within Australia for vilification and hatred. The issues on a wider scale, yes i sympathise too. In relation to issues such as Palestine, and Syria, yes I feel the western nations are statuesque in these matters. They do not even bother or in fact continue to support the wrong side, and wrong course of action. It is frustrating and sickening, but it is not reason to act against your religion and behave in a manner that is never justified within what you claim to be practicing. Once again, I leave this here: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/mehdi-hasan/jihadist-radicalisation-islam-for-dummies_b_5697160.htmlEdited by zimbos_05: 19/9/2014 07:25:58 PM
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
zimbos_05 wrote:
IS, and ISIS do not have any basis in Islam. They do not represent Islam because THEY ARE NOT ISLAM. Muslim leaders and communities have spoken out against them. We do not support them. We have questions about them that probably should be raised on a wider level, but on the whole we do not support them or recognise them. Once again, they are not Islam.
And yet, they say they are. How come your type of Islam is better than their type Islam? How come your Islam is right and theirs is wrong? What makes you, or others, the gatekeepers of what is and wasn't isn't "true" Islam? Why is your imaginary friend better than their imaginary friends? You and them are all Islamists. You're just a different flavour of Islam. I bet if you came face to face with one of these ISIS cockheads he'd accuse you of being a soft cock and not fervent enough, not devout enough and for all intents and purposes not a real Muslim. In the last 600 years the Moslem world has added just about nothing to advance civilisation. If the mad middle Eastern types had no fucking oil the whole area would be a backward, stone hut living, eking out an existence, desert dwelling bunch of medieval animals. A skidmark on the underpants of civilisation. The sooner religion is banned the better. And that goes for Christianity as well.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|