Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:Benjamin wrote:humbert wrote:Vintage rc. Not yet encountered a dictator he didn't slobber over.
"Rivers of blood" Gaddafi it is. Crackers is the textbook example of 'The enemy of my enemy is my friend' - he will support anyone who stands up to America - and no doubt he'll tell us that his extensive research on all these matters has brought him to a conclusive position which he will not change - no matter what evidence is put infront of him, because all that evidence has no doubt been cooked up by America or their lackies. what part of "Thou shalt not kill" dont you understand? because you openly have supported the killing of Gaddafi, and how did that turn out for you? "Thou shalt not kill" is a religious commandment - as I don't have any tolerance for religion, quoting the Bible is lost on me.
|
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:humbert wrote:Benjamin wrote:ricecrackers wrote:humbert wrote:Vintage rc. Not yet encountered a dictator he didn't slobber over.
"Rivers of blood" Gaddafi it is. I'm no particular fan of Gaddafi however he provided an iron fisted buffer against far worse evils as a number of the dictators in the region have done but if you're satisfied with the Islamic State running rampant through north africa and the middle east and sending them back to the middle ages then who am I to question your motives perhaps it all serves the interests of Israel in the end right Sooner or later every conspiracy theorist comes back to the Zionist stance. Clockwork. +1. Dem jews control everything. what do jews have to do with zionism? Your definition of Zionism is obviously very different to the official one... Without knowing which crackpot theory you are about to espouse next it's impossible for me to answer your question in a manner you would accept. However, if we go by the regular definition that Zionism is a movement of the Jews to support the establishment and strengthening of the Jewish homeland, I would argue that it's got more than a little to do with Jews. I'll sit back now and wait for you to tell me what the true definition of Zionism is, and in particular how it doesn't have anything to do with Jews.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:ricecrackers wrote:Benjamin wrote:humbert wrote:Vintage rc. Not yet encountered a dictator he didn't slobber over.
"Rivers of blood" Gaddafi it is. Crackers is the textbook example of 'The enemy of my enemy is my friend' - he will support anyone who stands up to America - and no doubt he'll tell us that his extensive research on all these matters has brought him to a conclusive position which he will not change - no matter what evidence is put infront of him, because all that evidence has no doubt been cooked up by America or their lackies. what part of "Thou shalt not kill" dont you understand? because you openly have supported the killing of Gaddafi, and how did that turn out for you? "Thou shalt not kill" is a religious commandment - as I don't have any tolerance for religion, quoting the Bible is lost on me. its also the law, i hate to break it to you
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
Well played, PB.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:ricecrackers wrote:humbert wrote:Benjamin wrote:ricecrackers wrote:humbert wrote:Vintage rc. Not yet encountered a dictator he didn't slobber over.
"Rivers of blood" Gaddafi it is. I'm no particular fan of Gaddafi however he provided an iron fisted buffer against far worse evils as a number of the dictators in the region have done but if you're satisfied with the Islamic State running rampant through north africa and the middle east and sending them back to the middle ages then who am I to question your motives perhaps it all serves the interests of Israel in the end right Sooner or later every conspiracy theorist comes back to the Zionist stance. Clockwork. +1. Dem jews control everything. what do jews have to do with zionism? Your definition of Zionism is obviously very different to the official one... Without knowing which crackpot theory you are about to espouse next it's impossible for me to answer your question in a manner you would accept. However, if we go by the regular definition that Zionism is a movement of the Jews to support the establishment and strengthening of the Jewish homeland, I would argue that it's got more than a little to do with Jews. I'll sit back now and wait for you to tell me what the true definition of Zionism is, and in particular how it doesn't have anything to do with Jews. unless I'm mistaken, I'm quite sure I didnt ask you but thanks for your wikipedia researched input you make a lot of assumptions about me. you know very little, my initial comment was directed at humbert because i know where he reads a lot of his news and where his allegiances lay. I also know that Israel has a preference to supporting insurrections against neighboring dictators. you decided to take the discussion in the direction of zionism to isolate your target from sympathy and argue against what you consider to be abhorrent... the crazy anti semite conspiracy nut... because that's all you understand from your daily diet of The Guardian dribble
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:what do jews have to do with zionism? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Draupnir wrote:ricecrackers wrote:what do jews have to do with zionism? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: racist
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:Draupnir wrote:ricecrackers wrote:what do jews have to do with zionism? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: racist Please find me any source that doesn't connect Zionism to Jews. Any.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Draupnir wrote:ricecrackers wrote:Draupnir wrote:ricecrackers wrote:what do jews have to do with zionism? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: racist Please find me any source that doesn't connect Zionism to Jews. Any. read the thread again dimwit, maybe your comprehension of what has taken place will improve on second or third viewing
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
It's a simple question mate. One source that claims no link between Zionism and Jews.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Draupnir wrote:It's a simple question mate. One source that claims no link between Zionism and Jews. I never made that claim, your question is irrelevant as are you to this discussion
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:Draupnir wrote:It's a simple question mate. One source that claims no link between Zionism and Jews. I never made that claim, your question is irrelevant as are you to this discussion ricecrackers wrote:what do jews have to do with zionism? Suppose you were just asking for an essay. On your bike.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Draupnir wrote:ricecrackers wrote:Draupnir wrote:It's a simple question mate. One source that claims no link between Zionism and Jews. I never made that claim, your question is irrelevant as are you to this discussion ricecrackers wrote:what do jews have to do with zionism? Suppose you were just asking for an essay. On your bike. i was asking a particular member in a particular context, not dear old butthurt you, so jog on
|
|
|
Jong Gabe
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
EDIT: not on - pv4 Edited by pv4: 17/11/2014 09:53:19 PM
E
|
|
|
australiantibullus
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.3K,
Visits: 0
|
EDIT: all g - pv4
Edited by pv4: 17/11/2014 09:54:31 PM
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
ET delivering once again.
|
|
|
SocaWho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.3K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:Benjamin wrote:ricecrackers wrote:Benjamin wrote:ricecrackers wrote:Benjamin wrote:ricecrackers wrote:i wonder what supreme leader Obama has done with his right hand Same as most US Presidents I would suspect. so he gets a free pass then, ok If I post up a list of the great things Obama has achieved, feel free to rebut with the fact that he's responsible for thousands of dead and a heap of debt that will ruin many lives... However, on this occasion, someone popped up a list of nice things Gaddafi did for his people (or believed should be done for his people), so I felt compelled to point out that Gaddafi was a murderous c*nt. so you think Libya is now better off for his absence since it was liberated by Obama and Gaddafi was murdered by the mercenaries paid for by the US led kinetic action? I think the world is a better place without Gaddafi in it. ok. so islamic militants now running riot all over north africa and flooding into Syria and Iraq which has occurred since Gaddafi was murdered is part of making the world a better place is it... ok Its a lesser of 2 evils....Islamic State or Ghaddafi,Ehud Barak,Saddam Hussein,Assad. I preferred the latter.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
SocaWho wrote:ricecrackers wrote:Benjamin wrote:ricecrackers wrote:Benjamin wrote:ricecrackers wrote:Benjamin wrote:ricecrackers wrote:i wonder what supreme leader Obama has done with his right hand Same as most US Presidents I would suspect. so he gets a free pass then, ok If I post up a list of the great things Obama has achieved, feel free to rebut with the fact that he's responsible for thousands of dead and a heap of debt that will ruin many lives... However, on this occasion, someone popped up a list of nice things Gaddafi did for his people (or believed should be done for his people), so I felt compelled to point out that Gaddafi was a murderous c*nt. so you think Libya is now better off for his absence since it was liberated by Obama and Gaddafi was murdered by the mercenaries paid for by the US led kinetic action? I think the world is a better place without Gaddafi in it. ok. so islamic militants now running riot all over north africa and flooding into Syria and Iraq which has occurred since Gaddafi was murdered is part of making the world a better place is it... ok Its a lesser of 2 evils....Islamic State or Ghaddafi,Ehud Barak,Saddam Hussein,Assad. I preferred the latter. the latter in your sentence or the latter in chronology?
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:humbert wrote:ricecrackers wrote:humbert wrote:Vintage rc. Not yet encountered a dictator he didn't slobber over.
"Rivers of blood" Gaddafi it is. I'm no particular fan of Gaddafi however he provided an iron fisted buffer against far worse evils as a number of the dictators in the region have done but if you're satisfied with the Islamic State running rampant through north africa and the middle east and sending them back to the middle ages then who am I to question your motives perhaps it all serves the interests of Israel in the end right At what point have I said anything about my position vis a vis the Islamic state? context the vacuum of killing Gaddafi has allowed the Islamic State to flourish And the knocking off of Sadam Hussein. He was a bastard but he kept the mad bastards in his country from cutting each others throats. Tito was a bit the same.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
The Maco
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
u4486662 wrote:ET delivering once again.  Its not an ET thread till ricey gets amongst it
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Munrubenmuz wrote:ricecrackers wrote:humbert wrote:ricecrackers wrote:humbert wrote:Vintage rc. Not yet encountered a dictator he didn't slobber over.
"Rivers of blood" Gaddafi it is. I'm no particular fan of Gaddafi however he provided an iron fisted buffer against far worse evils as a number of the dictators in the region have done but if you're satisfied with the Islamic State running rampant through north africa and the middle east and sending them back to the middle ages then who am I to question your motives perhaps it all serves the interests of Israel in the end right At what point have I said anything about my position vis a vis the Islamic state? context the vacuum of killing Gaddafi has allowed the Islamic State to flourish And the knocking off of Sadam Hussein. He was a bastard but he kept the mad bastards in his country from cutting each others throats. Tito was a bit the same. and Assad who now has to contend with Islamists flying in from all over the world which for some reason the greatest military force the world has ever seen (and its allies) seem unable or unwilling to stop
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Note I am not saying Saddam Hussein was a top bloke just that he kept his house in order. How he did so is, of course, was the problem.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Munrubenmuz wrote:Note I am not saying Saddam Hussein was a top bloke just that he kept his house in order.
How he did so is, of course, was the problem. he was our guy originally
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:Note I am not saying Saddam Hussein was a top bloke just that he kept his house in order.
How he did so is, of course, was the problem. he was our guy originally As a buffer against Iran. Yes, yes, Americans poking their nose in again.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Munrubenmuz wrote:ricecrackers wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:Note I am not saying Saddam Hussein was a top bloke just that he kept his house in order.
How he did so is, of course, was the problem. he was our guy originally As a buffer against Iran. Yes, yes, Americans poking their nose in again. and the pretext to both of the Bush Iraq wars was falsified
|
|
|
humbert
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:ricecrackers wrote:humbert wrote:ricecrackers wrote:humbert wrote:Vintage rc. Not yet encountered a dictator he didn't slobber over.
"Rivers of blood" Gaddafi it is. I'm no particular fan of Gaddafi however he provided an iron fisted buffer against far worse evils as a number of the dictators in the region have done but if you're satisfied with the Islamic State running rampant through north africa and the middle east and sending them back to the middle ages then who am I to question your motives perhaps it all serves the interests of Israel in the end right At what point have I said anything about my position vis a vis the Islamic state? context the vacuum of killing Gaddafi has allowed the Islamic State to flourish And the knocking off of Sadam Hussein. He was a bastard but he kept the mad bastards in his country from cutting each others throats. Tito was a bit the same. and Assad who now has to contend with Islamists flying in from all over the world which for some reason the greatest military force the world has ever seen (and its allies) seem unable or unwilling to stop That's precisely why he emptied Syria's prisons of its jihadists at the precise moment when the nationalist opposition was strongest. Or why he then proceeded to buy oil from ISIS. A third rate scumbag and his enablers, such as yourself.
|
|
|
humbert
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:ricecrackers wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:Note I am not saying Saddam Hussein was a top bloke just that he kept his house in order.
How he did so is, of course, was the problem. he was our guy originally As a buffer against Iran. Yes, yes, Americans poking their nose in again. and the pretext to both of the Bush Iraq wars was falsified I take it Saddam didn't order the invasion and annexation of Kuwait then? Must have been propaganda, I'm sure.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
humbert wrote: I take it Saddam didn't order the invasion and annexation of Kuwait then? Must have been propaganda, I'm sure.
Fitted up for the 2nd go round though.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
humbert wrote:ricecrackers wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:ricecrackers wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:Note I am not saying Saddam Hussein was a top bloke just that he kept his house in order.
How he did so is, of course, was the problem. he was our guy originally As a buffer against Iran. Yes, yes, Americans poking their nose in again. and the pretext to both of the Bush Iraq wars was falsified I take it Saddam didn't order the invasion and annexation of Kuwait then? Must have been propaganda, I'm sure. he did invade Kuwait, but the pretext for the US led intervention was falsified
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
humbert wrote:ricecrackers wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:ricecrackers wrote:humbert wrote:ricecrackers wrote:humbert wrote:Vintage rc. Not yet encountered a dictator he didn't slobber over.
"Rivers of blood" Gaddafi it is. I'm no particular fan of Gaddafi however he provided an iron fisted buffer against far worse evils as a number of the dictators in the region have done but if you're satisfied with the Islamic State running rampant through north africa and the middle east and sending them back to the middle ages then who am I to question your motives perhaps it all serves the interests of Israel in the end right At what point have I said anything about my position vis a vis the Islamic state? context the vacuum of killing Gaddafi has allowed the Islamic State to flourish And the knocking off of Sadam Hussein. He was a bastard but he kept the mad bastards in his country from cutting each others throats. Tito was a bit the same. and Assad who now has to contend with Islamists flying in from all over the world which for some reason the greatest military force the world has ever seen (and its allies) seem unable or unwilling to stop That's precisely why he emptied Syria's prisons of its jihadists at the precise moment when the nationalist opposition was strongest. Or why he then proceeded to buy oil from ISIS. [size=8]A third rate scumbag and his enablers, such as yourself[/size]. your fantastical version of events is a little biased to say the least as for your personal words, quite harsh shame on you
|
|
|